SBGold said:
https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/steve-hilton-ad-lgbtq-22463246.php
What an ad!
Love this guy, but Becerra all the way.
Vote Blue and Vote Becerra
🚨 BREAKING: Becerra PULLS OUT of tomorrow's LA Times debate.
— Steve Hilton (@SteveHiltonx) October 5, 2026
The move comes after a new poll found CNN debate viewers favored Hilton 74% to 20%.
In August, Becerra promised MULTIPLE debates. Now after losing the first, he's back in hiding—taking voters for granted. Pathetic! pic.twitter.com/uwlwfehSoI
SBGold said:
We need Becerra to win. DJT wouldn't mind Hilty being nuked as long as it takes out LA also
VOTE BLUE AND VOTE BECERRA
dajo9 said:
Has Hilton condemned Trump's suggestion that Iran destroy San Diego or Los Angeles yet? Has the corporate media asked him to yet? They probably won't. That's usually a technique they only reserve for Demoand really important people, like Hassan Piker.
ChudBear said:dajo9 said:
Has Hilton condemned Trump's suggestion that Iran destroy San Diego or Los Angeles yet? Has the corporate media asked him to yet? They probably won't. That's usually a technique they only reserve for Demoand really important people, like Hassan Piker.
Trump was suggesting the opposite and saying gas prices are a small price to pay for American safety. Go back to the drawing board and create the next faux outrage.
SBGold said:ChudBear said:dajo9 said:
Has Hilton condemned Trump's suggestion that Iran destroy San Diego or Los Angeles yet? Has the corporate media asked him to yet? They probably won't. That's usually a technique they only reserve for Demoand really important people, like Hassan Piker.
Trump was suggesting the opposite and saying gas prices are a small price to pay for American safety. Go back to the drawing board and create the next faux outrage.
Nah, we heard what we heard and it was not that.
VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
HILTY IS TRASH
dajo9 said:
Has Hilton condemned Trump's suggestion that Iran destroy San Diego or Los Angeles yet? Has the corporate media asked him to yet? They probably won't. That's usually a technique they only reserve for Demoand really important people, like Hassan Piker.
Even CNN fact checkers have the brain capacity to understand President Trump wasn’t inviting Iran to blow up Los Angeles and San Diego.
— Kevin Dalton (@TheKevinDalton) October 6, 2026
Gavin Newsom’s taxpayer funded propagandists are a different story. https://t.co/MSMPFh2qRx pic.twitter.com/ZjDB8loMd3
dajo9 said:
Steve Hilton still hasn't condemned Trump's comments suggesting Iran "take out" Los Angeles and San Diego. A failure of attempted leadership
dajo9 said:
The corporate media should be asking Steve Hilton every day about Trump's comments proposing that Iran "take out" Los Angeles and San Diego. Of course, they won't. But why won't he condemn this attack on the people he wants to govern?
wifeisafurd said:
Latest poll shows Baccerra's lead is down to 5.5% from over 15% pre-debate. Woah. Even Gold likes Hilton's ads. I tend to view this as a Republican can never win statewide office in CA and a Democratic can't win in Texas. Well buckle-up cause I think Texas mayhave a Democratic senator. Still can't see Hilton beating Baccerra no matter that fact Baccerra went to Stanford and he is a bad candidate.
dajo9 said:
Has Hilton condemned Trump's comments that Iran could "take out" Los Angeles and San Diego yet?
DiabloWags said:
San Jose Mercury News, Oct. 8th, 2026
dajo9 said:
Has Hilton condemned Trump's comments that Iran could "take out" Los Angeles and San Diego yet?
ChudBear said:DiabloWags said:
San Jose Mercury News, Oct. 8th, 2026
Becerra is running on a singular issue, Trump. Hilton has real ideas.
SBGold said:ChudBear said:DiabloWags said:
San Jose Mercury News, Oct. 8th, 2026
Becerra is running on a singular issue, Trump. Hilton has real ideas.
Those ideas are just to bow to Trump and to not advocate for California at all
VOTE BECERRA
ChudBear said:SBGold said:ChudBear said:DiabloWags said:
San Jose Mercury News, Oct. 8th, 2026
Becerra is running on a singular issue, Trump. Hilton has real ideas.
Those ideas are just to bow to Trump and to not advocate for California at all
VOTE BECERRA
Are you always this wrong. Don't answer that, its rhetorical.
Hilton's campaign's current "Califordable" agenda includes $3 gasoline, cutting utility bills roughly in half, eliminating state income tax on the first $150,000 of earnings, reducing housing fees and regulations to revive starter-home construction, and abolishing California's $800 annual minimum franchise tax on small businesses.
He's only not advocating for Californians if you don't actually pay attention to his campaign.
dajo9 said:ChudBear said:SBGold said:ChudBear said:DiabloWags said:
San Jose Mercury News, Oct. 8th, 2026
Becerra is running on a singular issue, Trump. Hilton has real ideas.
Those ideas are just to bow to Trump and to not advocate for California at all
VOTE BECERRA
Are you always this wrong. Don't answer that, its rhetorical.
Hilton's campaign's current "Califordable" agenda includes $3 gasoline, cutting utility bills roughly in half, eliminating state income tax on the first $150,000 of earnings, reducing housing fees and regulations to revive starter-home construction, and abolishing California's $800 annual minimum franchise tax on small businesses.
He's only not advocating for Californians if you don't actually pay attention to his campaign.
More of the something for nothing that conservatives have offered us for 50 years now which has gotten us into our current mess
dajo9 said:ChudBear said:SBGold said:ChudBear said:DiabloWags said:
San Jose Mercury News, Oct. 8th, 2026
Becerra is running on a singular issue, Trump. Hilton has real ideas.
Those ideas are just to bow to Trump and to not advocate for California at all
VOTE BECERRA
Are you always this wrong. Don't answer that, its rhetorical.
Hilton's campaign's current "Califordable" agenda includes $3 gasoline, cutting utility bills roughly in half, eliminating state income tax on the first $150,000 of earnings, reducing housing fees and regulations to revive starter-home construction, and abolishing California's $800 annual minimum franchise tax on small businesses.
He's only not advocating for Californians if you don't actually pay attention to his campaign.
More of the something for nothing that conservatives have offered us for 50 years now which has gotten us into our current mess
calpoly said:wifeisafurd said:
Latest poll shows Baccerra's lead is down to 5.5% from over 15% pre-debate. Woah. Even Gold likes Hilton's ads. I tend to view this as a Republican can never win statewide office in CA and a Democratic can't win in Texas. Well buckle-up cause I think Texas mayhave a Democratic senator. Still can't see Hilton beating Baccerra no matter that fact Baccerra went to Stanford and he is a bad candidate.
Do you think Hilton is a good candidate? Why do you thin Baccerra is a bad candidate?
DiabloWags said:
San Jose Mercury News, Oct. 8th, 2026
ChudBear said:dajo9 said:ChudBear said:SBGold said:ChudBear said:DiabloWags said:
San Jose Mercury News, Oct. 8th, 2026
Becerra is running on a singular issue, Trump. Hilton has real ideas.
Those ideas are just to bow to Trump and to not advocate for California at all
VOTE BECERRA
Are you always this wrong. Don't answer that, its rhetorical.
Hilton's campaign's current "Califordable" agenda includes $3 gasoline, cutting utility bills roughly in half, eliminating state income tax on the first $150,000 of earnings, reducing housing fees and regulations to revive starter-home construction, and abolishing California's $800 annual minimum franchise tax on small businesses.
He's only not advocating for Californians if you don't actually pay attention to his campaign.
More of the something for nothing that conservatives have offered us for 50 years now which has gotten us into our current mess
Democrats have controlled both chambers of the California Legislature since 1996. Democrats have had a super majority in California for almost eight years straight. Democrats have had a super majority in California for 12 of the last 14 years. Time to stop blaming their faults on everyone but them
wifeisafurd said:calpoly said:wifeisafurd said:
Latest poll shows Baccerra's lead is down to 5.5% from over 15% pre-debate. Woah. Even Gold likes Hilton's ads. I tend to view this as a Republican can never win statewide office in CA and a Democratic can't win in Texas. Well buckle-up cause I think Texas mayhave a Democratic senator. Still can't see Hilton beating Baccerra no matter that fact Baccerra went to Stanford and he is a bad candidate.
Do you think Hilton is a good candidate? Why do you thin Baccerra is a bad candidate?
Becerra: He is a Furd. Media reports point to shaky debate performances, evasive or muddled policy responses, and a an overly passive or detached style, at a time polls indicate voters are unhappy with the way CA is going. Way too many former federal colleagues and high-profile Democrats have withheld public support or offered critical remarks regarding his management style and readiness for the governorship. He seems to offer no new ideas to the huge issues Ca fact and is only response to any issues seems to be Trump. He has a lot of skeletons in his closet that are going to come out when he is looked at nationally, and a lot of criticism is going to come from fellow Dems. And if GOP somehow manages to remain in control is Congress expect at lot of investigations. Personality wiser, he is bland/boring technocrat, which after the last two Governor may make him a bad candidate, though you can debate if that makes him a bad governor. And for those who this matters, he isn't really very progressive, and is in the pocket of a lot of big money vested interests.
Hilton: He has run a good and clever campaign, as I think as Gold has alluded to. He has the highest number of individual donors and he draws large crowds which suggests a cult following. Is he a strong candidate? He has strong ties to Trump which is a big negative in CA. He certainly doesn't have strong ties to the State, His desire to slash bureaucracy, (shades of the Elon disaster) and roll back environmental/development regulations, may be a misread of a liberal State.
I think that people are concerned about the direction of the State and view Bacerra as boring retread of the same policies and Hilton represents something different, but Hilton, while a much more dynamic personality, may not be the answer for a majority of voters.
ChudBear said:SBGold said:ChudBear said:DiabloWags said:
San Jose Mercury News, Oct. 8th, 2026
Becerra is running on a singular issue, Trump. Hilton has real ideas.
Those ideas are just to bow to Trump and to not advocate for California at all
VOTE BECERRA
Are you always this wrong. Don't answer that, its rhetorical.
Hilton's campaign's current "Califordable" agenda includes $3 gasoline, cutting utility bills roughly in half, eliminating state income tax on the first $150,000 of earnings, reducing housing fees and regulations to revive starter-home construction, and abolishing California's $800 annual minimum franchise tax on small businesses.
He's only not advocating for Californians if you don't actually pay attention to his campaign.
dajo9 said:ChudBear said:dajo9 said:ChudBear said:SBGold said:ChudBear said:DiabloWags said:
San Jose Mercury News, Oct. 8th, 2026
Becerra is running on a singular issue, Trump. Hilton has real ideas.
Those ideas are just to bow to Trump and to not advocate for California at all
VOTE BECERRA
Are you always this wrong. Don't answer that, its rhetorical.
Hilton's campaign's current "Califordable" agenda includes $3 gasoline, cutting utility bills roughly in half, eliminating state income tax on the first $150,000 of earnings, reducing housing fees and regulations to revive starter-home construction, and abolishing California's $800 annual minimum franchise tax on small businesses.
He's only not advocating for Californians if you don't actually pay attention to his campaign.
More of the something for nothing that conservatives have offered us for 50 years now which has gotten us into our current mess
Democrats have controlled both chambers of the California Legislature since 1996. Democrats have had a super majority in California for almost eight years straight. Democrats have had a super majority in California for 12 of the last 14 years. Time to stop blaming their faults on everyone but them
Hilton is offering to wreck California finances like the conservatives have wrecked America's finances
SBGold said:ChudBear said:SBGold said:ChudBear said:DiabloWags said:
San Jose Mercury News, Oct. 8th, 2026
Becerra is running on a singular issue, Trump. Hilton has real ideas.
Those ideas are just to bow to Trump and to not advocate for California at all
VOTE BECERRA
Are you always this wrong. Don't answer that, its rhetorical.
Hilton's campaign's current "Califordable" agenda includes $3 gasoline, cutting utility bills roughly in half, eliminating state income tax on the first $150,000 of earnings, reducing housing fees and regulations to revive starter-home construction, and abolishing California's $800 annual minimum franchise tax on small businesses.
He's only not advocating for Californians if you don't actually pay attention to his campaign.
I stopped reading after $3 gas and cutting utility bills, he has no plan he's a joke
VOTE BLUE AND VOTE BECERRA
SBGold said:wifeisafurd said:calpoly said:wifeisafurd said:
Latest poll shows Baccerra's lead is down to 5.5% from over 15% pre-debate. Woah. Even Gold likes Hilton's ads. I tend to view this as a Republican can never win statewide office in CA and a Democratic can't win in Texas. Well buckle-up cause I think Texas mayhave a Democratic senator. Still can't see Hilton beating Baccerra no matter that fact Baccerra went to Stanford and he is a bad candidate.
Do you think Hilton is a good candidate? Why do you thin Baccerra is a bad candidate?
Becerra: He is a Furd. Media reports point to shaky debate performances, evasive or muddled policy responses, and a an overly passive or detached style, at a time polls indicate voters are unhappy with the way CA is going. Way too many former federal colleagues and high-profile Democrats have withheld public support or offered critical remarks regarding his management style and readiness for the governorship. He seems to offer no new ideas to the huge issues Ca fact and is only response to any issues seems to be Trump. He has a lot of skeletons in his closet that are going to come out when he is looked at nationally, and a lot of criticism is going to come from fellow Dems. And if GOP somehow manages to remain in control is Congress expect at lot of investigations. Personality wiser, he is bland/boring technocrat, which after the last two Governor may make him a bad candidate, though you can debate if that makes him a bad governor. And for those who this matters, he isn't really very progressive, and is in the pocket of a lot of big money vested interests.
Hilton: He has run a good and clever campaign, as I think as Gold has alluded to. He has the highest number of individual donors and he draws large crowds which suggests a cult following. Is he a strong candidate? He has strong ties to Trump which is a big negative in CA. He certainly doesn't have strong ties to the State, His desire to slash bureaucracy, (shades of the Elon disaster) and roll back environmental/development regulations, may be a misread of a liberal State.
I think that people are concerned about the direction of the State and view Bacerra as boring retread of the same policies and Hilton represents something different, but Hilton, while a much more dynamic personality, may not be the answer for a majority of voters.
This is a fair read of things, even I am heavy in the Becerra support
ChudBear said:SBGold said:wifeisafurd said:calpoly said:wifeisafurd said:
Latest poll shows Baccerra's lead is down to 5.5% from over 15% pre-debate. Woah. Even Gold likes Hilton's ads. I tend to view this as a Republican can never win statewide office in CA and a Democratic can't win in Texas. Well buckle-up cause I think Texas mayhave a Democratic senator. Still can't see Hilton beating Baccerra no matter that fact Baccerra went to Stanford and he is a bad candidate.
Do you think Hilton is a good candidate? Why do you thin Baccerra is a bad candidate?
Becerra: He is a Furd. Media reports point to shaky debate performances, evasive or muddled policy responses, and a an overly passive or detached style, at a time polls indicate voters are unhappy with the way CA is going. Way too many former federal colleagues and high-profile Democrats have withheld public support or offered critical remarks regarding his management style and readiness for the governorship. He seems to offer no new ideas to the huge issues Ca fact and is only response to any issues seems to be Trump. He has a lot of skeletons in his closet that are going to come out when he is looked at nationally, and a lot of criticism is going to come from fellow Dems. And if GOP somehow manages to remain in control is Congress expect at lot of investigations. Personality wiser, he is bland/boring technocrat, which after the last two Governor may make him a bad candidate, though you can debate if that makes him a bad governor. And for those who this matters, he isn't really very progressive, and is in the pocket of a lot of big money vested interests.
Hilton: He has run a good and clever campaign, as I think as Gold has alluded to. He has the highest number of individual donors and he draws large crowds which suggests a cult following. Is he a strong candidate? He has strong ties to Trump which is a big negative in CA. He certainly doesn't have strong ties to the State, His desire to slash bureaucracy, (shades of the Elon disaster) and roll back environmental/development regulations, may be a misread of a liberal State.
I think that people are concerned about the direction of the State and view Bacerra as boring retread of the same policies and Hilton represents something different, but Hilton, while a much more dynamic personality, may not be the answer for a majority of voters.
This is a fair read of things, even I am heavy in the Becerra support
You do know he basically called Becerra a fake Democrat and a really poor candidate and you agree with what he said and still want to vote for him?
Somebody posted recently asking if critical thinking skills are dead. This should confirm that question.
