Off Topic
Sponsored by

Trump's Press Secretary

7,696 Views | 164 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by BearlySane88
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

"This had nothing to do with her job performance"

Yeah.
That's why she lasted only 5 DAYS.



She would have been fired right after the first presser if that was why. She's being fired because she lied.

Since when did Trump ever have an issue with LIARS?



You would have found issue whether he fired her or not.


She clearly wasnt ready for Prime Time.
That's a FACT.



Go back and watch past Press Secretaries on their first days. They all suck ass. It's not the reason she was fired.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cool story.
Even Trump's lap dog Hannity destroyed her.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B.D.Bear said:

concordtom said:

B.D.Bear said:

concordtom said:

DiabloWags said:

"This had nothing to do with her job performance"

Yeah.
That's why she lasted only 5 DAYS.



Walked right into that one as well!!!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

He walked right into the facts? It does appear that many in this board don't rely on facts anymore, they only rely on hatred for a person to form opinions.


Not Trump walking into it.
BearlySane walked right into it.

I think you misunderstood the conversation behind the conversation going on here.
It's okay, no matter.

I know. BearlySane walked into the same conclusion you did with the video you posted. I agree with BearlySane also

Actually, not exactly what we were talking about.
B.D.Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

B.D.Bear said:

concordtom said:

B.D.Bear said:

concordtom said:

DiabloWags said:

"This had nothing to do with her job performance"

Yeah.
That's why she lasted only 5 DAYS.



Walked right into that one as well!!!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

He walked right into the facts? It does appear that many in this board don't rely on facts anymore, they only rely on hatred for a person to form opinions.


Not Trump walking into it.
BearlySane walked right into it.

I think you misunderstood the conversation behind the conversation going on here.
It's okay, no matter.

I know. BearlySane walked into the same conclusion you did with the video you posted. I agree with BearlySane also

Actually, not exactly what we were talking about.

You appeared to agree it wasn't because of her performance but because of her lie.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B.D.Bear said:

concordtom said:

B.D.Bear said:

concordtom said:

B.D.Bear said:

concordtom said:

DiabloWags said:

"This had nothing to do with her job performance"

Yeah.
That's why she lasted only 5 DAYS.



Walked right into that one as well!!!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

He walked right into the facts? It does appear that many in this board don't rely on facts anymore, they only rely on hatred for a person to form opinions.


Not Trump walking into it.
BearlySane walked right into it.

I think you misunderstood the conversation behind the conversation going on here.
It's okay, no matter.

I know. BearlySane walked into the same conclusion you did with the video you posted. I agree with BearlySane also

Actually, not exactly what we were talking about.

You appeared to agree it wasn't because of her performance but because of her lie.


The walking right into things has to do with the setup and grandslam between mostly insane and DW.

Anyways, go bears!
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nobody cares
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

B.D.Bear said:

concordtom said:

B.D.Bear said:

concordtom said:

B.D.Bear said:

concordtom said:

DiabloWags said:

"This had nothing to do with her job performance"

Yeah.
That's why she lasted only 5 DAYS.



Walked right into that one as well!!!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

He walked right into the facts? It does appear that many in this board don't rely on facts anymore, they only rely on hatred for a person to form opinions.


Not Trump walking into it.
BearlySane walked right into it.

I think you misunderstood the conversation behind the conversation going on here.
It's okay, no matter.

I know. BearlySane walked into the same conclusion you did with the video you posted. I agree with BearlySane also

Actually, not exactly what we were talking about.

You appeared to agree it wasn't because of her performance but because of her lie.


The walking right into things has to do with the setup and grandslam between mostly insane and DW.

Anyways, go bears!


High road.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gavin being snarky (top of the picture says "In memoriam")

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

Nobody cares


STOP the Presses.
Trump fired someone for lying!
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

First days can be rough, she's gonna do a great job. Flubbing a few words is hardly disastrous. This feels like another TDS inspired thread.

This is a great post


I still feel the same way considering I was talking about her performance and not the lawyer drama.


You said she was going to do a good job. You said that despite knowing she likely was lying about being a lawyer. Your post was a faceplant.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty sure sane was ok with the lying until Trump wasn't happy with her for whatever reason.
That's my read
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

What a disastrous year for the President. Is anything going right?

Imagine a grifting Jimmy Carter without the morals..
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

First days can be rough, she's gonna do a great job. Flubbing a few words is hardly disastrous. This feels like another TDS inspired thread.

This is a great post


I still feel the same way considering I was talking about her performance and not the lawyer drama.


You said she was going to do a good job. You said that despite knowing she likely was lying about being a lawyer. Your post was a faceplant.


I said she flubbed some words and first days are hard. I also was clearly talking about her performance regardless of how hard you try to spin it lol
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

Pretty sure sane was ok with the lying until Trump wasn't happy with her for whatever reason.
That's my read


Your read is wrong lol. I never commented on anything but her press conference performance
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


What a disastrous year for the President. Is anything going right?



Greenland, tons of investment commitments, effectively closed borders, lowest SNAP fraud usage in forever, the list goes on
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

First days can be rough, she's gonna do a great job. Flubbing a few words is hardly disastrous. This feels like another TDS inspired thread.

This is a great post


I still feel the same way considering I was talking about her performance and not the lawyer drama.


You said she was going to do a good job. You said that despite knowing she likely was lying about being a lawyer. Your post was a faceplant.


I said she flubbed some words and first days are hard. I also was clearly talking about her performance regardless of how hard you try to spin it lol

Your read is wrong lol. I never commented on anything but her press conference performance


You can't do snarky "lols" and claim the "high road" at the same time, it comes across as disingenuous and a bit emotionally immature.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

First days can be rough, she's gonna do a great job. Flubbing a few words is hardly disastrous. This feels like another TDS inspired thread.

This is a great post


I still feel the same way considering I was talking about her performance and not the lawyer drama.


You said she was going to do a good job. You said that despite knowing she likely was lying about being a lawyer. Your post was a faceplant.


I said she flubbed some words and first days are hard. I also was clearly talking about her performance regardless of how hard you try to spin it lol

Your read is wrong lol. I never commented on anything but her press conference performance


You can't do snarky "lols" and claim the "high road" at the same time, it comes across as disingenuous and a bit emotionally immature.


Different conversations but thank you for thinking so deeply about what I post lol. I can guarantee you that I do not care about your opinion on being immature or not though.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

First days can be rough, she's gonna do a great job. Flubbing a few words is hardly disastrous. This feels like another TDS inspired thread.


"She's gonna do a great job"

Well. Did she?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

First days can be rough, she's gonna do a great job. Flubbing a few words is hardly disastrous. This feels like another TDS inspired thread.


"She's gonna do a great job"

Well. Did she?


I said this before the lawyer issue and yes she likely would have if that hadn't arose. You keep poking at this and I've repeatedly said my comments were about her at the press conference and nothing else.

This dramatics in this whole thread are too funny. I'm with Anarchist here. Must be a slow news day.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

First days can be rough, she's gonna do a great job. Flubbing a few words is hardly disastrous. This feels like another TDS inspired thread.


"She's gonna do a great job"

Well. Did she?


I said this before the lawyer issue and yes she likely would have if that hadn't arose. You keep poking at this and I've repeatedly said my comments were about her at the press conference and nothing else.

This dramatics in this whole thread are too funny. I'm with Anarchist here. Must be a slow news day.

You did not say it before the lawyer issue. The lawyer issue was in the first post of this thread. The 2nd post is you saying "She's gonna do a great job". It's only a big deal because you are continuing the Trumpian humiliation.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Big C said:


What a disastrous year for the President. Is anything going right?



Greenland, tons of investment commitments, effectively closed borders, lowest SNAP fraud usage in forever, the list goes on


Greenland?
Did you really just say Greenland???

Lmao.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think that this is how Court TV would break down her performance and the SHATTERING of the Scaramucci World Record:

Don't think of it in terms of days (5 vs. 11).
Think of it in terms of words each spoke to the press during their brief tenures:

Zacharia - around 1500 to 2000 (a single 14-minute press conference).

Scaramucci - somewhere between 11,000 to 14,000 words, including a 37 minute press conference, interviews with CNN, BBC, Fox (Hannity), and The New Yorker (the one that got him fired), and an impromptu talk before a gaggle of reporters on the White House driveway.

All in all, Scaramucci delivered roughly 7 times as much content as Zacharia.
She truly shattered the record.

Simply breathtaking!





BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Big C said:


What a disastrous year for the President. Is anything going right?



Greenland, tons of investment commitments, effectively closed borders, lowest SNAP fraud usage in forever, the list goes on


Greenland?
Did you really just say Greenland???

Lmao.



Yes, I did. I'm not sure why the defense of the American people is laughable to you.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

First days can be rough, she's gonna do a great job. Flubbing a few words is hardly disastrous. This feels like another TDS inspired thread.


"She's gonna do a great job"

Well. Did she?


I said this before the lawyer issue and yes she likely would have if that hadn't arose. You keep poking at this and I've repeatedly said my comments were about her at the press conference and nothing else.

This dramatics in this whole thread are too funny. I'm with Anarchist here. Must be a slow news day.

You did not say it before the lawyer issue. The lawyer issue was in the first post of this thread. The 2nd post is you saying "She's gonna do a great job". It's only a big deal because you are continuing the Trumpian humiliation.


Lmao forgive me for not instantly believing one of the ten tabloid threads that a certain poster starts every day. Even then, my post was entirely about her presser. You seem stuck on being able to get over that fact so I'll let you keep arguing to yourself and I'm gonna stop responding to you on this. Have a great day!
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump complained that the Media treated Katie unfairly.
Then he fires her to prove that point.

Lmao.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

First days can be rough, she's gonna do a great job. Flubbing a few words is hardly disastrous. This feels like another TDS inspired thread.


"She's gonna do a great job"

Well. Did she?


I said this before the lawyer issue and yes she likely would have if that hadn't arose. You keep poking at this and I've repeatedly said my comments were about her at the press conference and nothing else.

This dramatics in this whole thread are too funny. I'm with Anarchist here. Must be a slow news day.

You did not say it before the lawyer issue. The lawyer issue was in the first post of this thread. The 2nd post is you saying "She's gonna do a great job". It's only a big deal because you are continuing the Trumpian humiliation.


Lmao forgive me for not instantly believing one of the ten tabloid threads that a certain poster starts every day. Even then, my post was entirely about her presser. You seem stuck on being able to get over that fact so I'll let you keep arguing to yourself and I'm gonna stop responding to you on this. Have a great day!


I started this thread. I don't do tabloid threads. My first post said her biggest problem was the lawyer issue. It's only a big deal because of how you are responding to being wrong.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

First days can be rough, she's gonna do a great job. Flubbing a few words is hardly disastrous. This feels like another TDS inspired thread.


"She's gonna do a great job"

Well. Did she?


I said this before the lawyer issue and yes she likely would have if that hadn't arose. You keep poking at this and I've repeatedly said my comments were about her at the press conference and nothing else.

This dramatics in this whole thread are too funny. I'm with Anarchist here. Must be a slow news day.

You did not say it before the lawyer issue. The lawyer issue was in the first post of this thread. The 2nd post is you saying "She's gonna do a great job". It's only a big deal because you are continuing the Trumpian humiliation.


Lmao forgive me for not instantly believing one of the ten tabloid threads that a certain poster starts every day. Even then, my post was entirely about her presser. You seem stuck on being able to get over that fact so I'll let you keep arguing to yourself and I'm gonna stop responding to you on this. Have a great day!


I started this thread. I don't do tabloid threads. My first post said her biggest problem was the lawyer issue. It's only a big deal because of how you are responding to being wrong.


Okay let me say this one very last time as clearly as possible. If you don't get it after this, you are on your own. You can't be wrong about an opinion. My opinion was her presser was fine and she would get better. That's the point I made then, that's the point I stand by making. Good grief.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People that continue making excuses for the conduct of this administration are trapping themselves on a self debasement graph moving in a downward trajectory at the same rate as the Administration.




….or would that be moving up on such a graph?
“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Big C said:


What a disastrous year for the President. Is anything going right?



Greenland, tons of investment commitments, effectively closed borders, lowest SNAP fraud usage in forever, the list goes on


Greenland?
Did you really just say Greenland???

Lmao.

We need Greenland to keep those war mongering Norwegians in check.
Sorry, no signature here.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

…trapping themselves on a self debasement graph moving in a downward trajectory


What is it you call yourself on here? You have a meme for it. Too freaking funny
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

bearister said:

…trapping themselves on a self debasement graph moving in a downward trajectory


What is it you call yourself on here? You have a meme for it. Too freaking funny


“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

I think that this is how Court TV would break down her performance and the SHATTERING of the Scaramucci World Record:

Don't think of it in terms of days (5 vs. 11).
Think of it in terms of words each spoke to the press during their brief tenures:

Zacharia - around 1500 to 2000 (a single 14-minute press conference).

Scaramucci - somewhere between 11,000 to 14,000 words, including a 37 minute press conference, interviews with CNN, BBC, Fox (Hannity), and The New Yorker (the one that got him fired), and an impromptu talk before a gaggle of reporters on the White House driveway.

All in all, Scaramucci delivered roughly 7 times as much content as Zacharia.
She truly shattered the record.

Simply breathtaking!








This graphic portrayal of her is very disappointing. Please take the bigotry elsewhere.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She 'twas brought down by Stolen Legal Valor.

“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


What a disastrous year for the President. Is anything going right?


He's probably received sexual favors for….how many new women?
-He's happy!
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

People that continue making excuses for the conduct of this administration are trapping themselves on a self debasement graph moving in a downward trajectory at the same rate as the Administration.




….or would that be moving up on such a graph?


I predict that before Trump leaves DC, there will be tanks, and the stock market will tank.
Which comes first?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.