We have not yet posted it.
I have not read it.
Here it is:
I have not read it.
Here it is:
dajo9 said:
It's clear this is a cover-up. They don't want the public to see all the evidence of collusion and obstruction of justice in the Mueller Report.
I don't know about all that, but it is clear on the obstruction charge that the President's actions were questionable with evidence both for and against Obstruction. I also believe the public has a right to know what those questionable actions were.dajo9 said:
It's clear this is a cover-up. They don't want the public to see all the evidence of collusion and obstruction of justice in the Mueller Report.
You'll have to refresh my memory on my use of the word treason.Anarchistbear said:
Still calling this treason, Dajo?
I want to see the Mueller reportAnarchistbear said:
So...no
Odd, I thought it would make the shape of a giant middle finger.concordtom said:
I hear Barr says he will release a redacted Mueller report by mid April.
But I obtained a hacked copy already for you all now. This is what it looks like.
Quote:
In fact, what is hinted at in the linguistic contortions could be pretty damning.
By now I'm sure you've read a ton of diaries about how the Barr memo doesn't really say much. What I want to do with this diary is tease out, clause by clause, exactly HOW absurd the Barr memo really is. Then I'll provide my synthesis of what I think the Barr memo may be hiding based on those contortions. I'll also include some pointed questions that I'd love to see Barr asked in front of a congressional committee.
Just curious, as you one of the black clad anarchists who break windows and crap during protests, or just the average slacker anarchist?Anarchistbear said:
OT: Trump/Russians/Robert Mueller: Part 2, The Nerds Fight Back
Anarchistbear said:
OT: Trump/Russians/Robert Mueller: Part 2, The Nerds Fight Back
Anarchistbear said:
I'd only say that there are some evil white supremacists out there that aren't that wimpy.
Anarchistbear said:
And Nazi Richard Spencer being served
I agree a sucker punch is a chickensh(t move...but then Nazism is a chickkensh*t ideology that executed 6 million people, started a world war. Anyone in the modern world aligning with that level of f'tardism, stupidity and hate doesn't really have a moral ground except it's a cheap shot. So I say punch away but maybe get better. The punch to the face is dramatic but a groin strike and elbow to neck hurts way more. YMMV.bearister said:Anarchistbear said:
And Nazi Richard Spencer being served
Even though Spencer is a tool, a sucker punch is pretty much at the top of the list of chickensh@t moves, side by side with hitting a woman.
Another Bear said:
Here's one for you language, linguistics and composition nerds. A very good breakdown of the Barr Letter:
The Barr Memo is Being Misinterpreted Exactly as IntendedQuote:
In fact, what is hinted at in the linguistic contortions could be pretty damning.
By now I'm sure you've read a ton of diaries about how the Barr memo doesn't really say much. What I want to do with this diary is tease out, clause by clause, exactly HOW absurd the Barr memo really is. Then I'll provide my synthesis of what I think the Barr memo may be hiding based on those contortions. I'll also include some pointed questions that I'd love to see Barr asked in front of a congressional committee.
That sums it up excellently.Unit2Sucks said:
Trump is an incompetent executive who should be voted out of office and forever be remembered as a self-promoting charlatan and a stain on our democracy.
Yeah, I'm not going to take a "Community" post on Daily Kos as anything authoritative. That said, a close reading of this article also basically says what Mueller said: The Trump Campaign did not directly collude with the Russians on influencing the election, but the report makes no judgment about obstruction or other financial crimes (the latter being, I think, largely out of his scope).Unit2Sucks said:
Hard to take a self-proclaimed expert linguist seriously with as many grammatical mistakes and typos as there are in that link. If you can't get "there" and "their" correct, it's hard for me to believe this person's linguistic chops are really that strong. Doesn't mean that there aren't holes in the Barr memo or that the there is no there there, but this is hardly the vicious takedown it was attempting to be.
We will certainly know a lot more when the more or less full report is released, but my starting assumption is that there is no really new and interesting information that hasn't been in the public domain and that being the case there is no juice to the Mueller report. Based on what is publicly known, Trump's campaign was receptive to assistance from Russia, didn't really receive much of value and apparently that all together isn't enough to indict these clowns.
Trump is an incompetent executive who should be voted out of office and forever be remembered as a self-promoting charlatan and a stain on our democracy.Another Bear said:
Here's one for you language, linguistics and composition nerds. A very good breakdown of the Barr Letter:
The Barr Memo is Being Misinterpreted Exactly as IntendedQuote:
In fact, what is hinted at in the linguistic contortions could be pretty damning.
By now I'm sure you've read a ton of diaries about how the Barr memo doesn't really say much. What I want to do with this diary is tease out, clause by clause, exactly HOW absurd the Barr memo really is. Then I'll provide my synthesis of what I think the Barr memo may be hiding based on those contortions. I'll also include some pointed questions that I'd love to see Barr asked in front of a congressional committee.