You're implying that your definition is both more accurate and dictates a goal of one should be to "import poverty"?Unit2Sucks said:GBear4Life said:
The results of Hispanic performance in American society is not just underwhelming, it's alarming -- from culture to IQ to values: illiteracy rates, illigitimacy rates, HS graduation rates, crime rates -- all while out pacing the American birth rate 2x. . The goal of any civil society isn't to import the culture that produces these results, it's to deport them. At minimum it's to prevent it's proportion from increasing.
You do understand that other people may have a different viewpoint on what "civil society" means right?
Do you want America to be more like 3rd world Mexico? If you do, then cut the BS and just say open borders is better because Mexico > U.S. Because then we can actually address that rather than this.
America isn't your compassion playground. It has a fiduciary duty to American citizens. Your brand of compassion is simply a different version than mine -- I simply don't call it compassion. There is cost and benefits to most compassion, and yours is no different. You can't pretend that your is simply benefits everyone and costs nothing. You are picking winners (illegals and losers (American interest; working class; justice). Your 'compassion' is nothing more than 'warm prejudice'. This is not the premise of good public policy, not does it have the moral high ground.