Cal Football Unlikely

29,345 Views | 317 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by philbert
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearChemist said:

Cal88 said:

BearChemist said:

Cal88 said:

calumnus said:

Cal88 said:

Professional soccer in Germany has been cleared to resume next weekend.

The pandemic started about the same time in the US as in Germany. Germany has had virtually the same death total as in an average flu year. The NY pandemic cycle will end later this month.

Nearly all professional sports in Europe will be back and running by August.I don't see why college football shouldn't be held this Fall as planned. The only question should be about the attendance. At the very least, they should allow students and younger fans in.


Professional baseball starts in Korea this week. It started on April 12th in Taiwan.

Korea and the US reported their first cases at the same time in February and Korea has MUCH more travel to/from China. Yet, in NYC, the largest city in the US, over 20,000 people have died. In Seoul, with a population of 10 million (vs 8 million in NYC) only 2 (two!) people have died.

And they are now playing professional baseball. Life is returning to normal in Taiwan and Korea BECAUSE they have the virus under control. If we had acted similarly....



It is also because they have built some herd immunity by not locking down completely. That is actually an essential part of their management strategy,

Follow what is going on in Europe carefully, as I do. Countries like Italy, which have fared much worse than the US, and will have nearly double the deaths per capita as the US, will eventually follow Germany's lead and restart their professional soccer league next month. Expect Italian Serie A games to start at the end of the month. Shops are reopening for business right now in Germany, and only gatherings over 50 people are banned in Sweden.

Epidemics follow Farr's Law, which stipulates that the infections and casualties have a bell curve. For relatively infectious diseases like covid, that curve is very narrow, surging quickly then fading equally fast, provided that some herd immunity is allowed to build up, this is one key to the success in countries like Japan, Korea, Singapore, Germany and Sweden.



The early wisdom of "flattening the curve" has not held up the test of time, it might actually result in higher deaths overall after all is said and done, and of course far greater economic damage with related casualties on that end. As well it leaves the country more open to the second wave, and provides greater opportunity for the virus to mutate. This is a bit counterintuitive, but many epidemiologists understand this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farr%27s_laws

https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/covid-19-william-farrs-way-out-of-the-pandemic/


Now this is the Cal 88 I remember. First of all, can you elaborate how South Korea has developed herd immunity? The country started testing like crazy since February and as of today has 11k confirmed cases, out of 52 millions population. Herd immunity has become the kind of buzz words that stupid people just throw around casually, not realizing that we are still ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE away from it in any country.

Second, saying European countries are looking to restart pro sport leagues so US can do so is like a jealous child asking why he cannot have shiny new toys like his neighbor does. Germany has reduced their R0 to 0.65 as of today, with the government setting clear guidelines for business to open gradually. Barber shops just opened in late April. Restaurants will only open after May 18. And this is for a country clearly on the far side of the bell curve. I don't understand how one can confidently lump US, which at best is right over the hump and with people doing sorts of stupid protest for their freedom of infecting others, together with European countries which have actual leadership that set policies based on scientific evidences -- While Trump was encouraging people to inject disinfectant, Merkel was explaining in plain language to German people the importance of keeping R0 below 1. The only similarity can be drawn between US and Germany is the RWNJs who find yet another excuse to flex muscles on the street.

Italy has not handled the crisis well at all, neither have France or Spain. Those countries are going to end up with death rates that are nearly double those of the US. Macron has actually been far worse than Trump as far as his handling of covid, believe it or not.

In France there is talk of restarting pro soccer in June with reduced fan attendance (5,000 or less), and the Spanish Liga players are already back in training as well. Italy is inching towards restarting its Serie A league in June, they've cleared players to practice. Sweden, which has never instituted stringent social distancing, is restarting its league in June.

If those countries, many of which got hit harder than the States, can have games on in a few weeks, I don't see why we can't have college football here four months from now.

If you just pull out the daily new confirmed case graph, France is two standard deviations away from the peak of the curve, which was the first week of April (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/france/). Italy peaked at the last week of March, have had a slow but steady decay, and now the daily cases is ~1.5k comparing to 6k during the peak. Spain also sees ~2k daily new cases this week, compared to 7.5k in late March.

As for US, the daily new cases has been around 25-30k FOR THE PAST FIVE WEEKS. (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/) It is not a bell curve but a step function. There is no, zero, nada sign of decay that is meaningful in the statistical sense. Italy and Spain employed nearly two month of strict lockdown and have seen the results. None of these countries has allowed restaurants to reopen yet, but now american crazies are feeling impatient after some half-ass SIP orders, seriously? Look at the graphs, Cal 88, because just weeks ago you were the most keen in posting the COVID cases in various countries. Look at them and tell us with straight face that US is anywhere close to qualified considering pro sports.

If you look at the picture in NY/NJ, you will see a sharp spiky normal distribution, like those in all other cities that were severely hit with covid, grows fast then drops nearly as fast, following Farr's law:



In the US we're already just past the peak in terms of new daily death, that much is clear from the graph you've linked. Perhaps in the US that curve, which is an aggregate count of a much larger country with many urban centers spread wider is going to be flatter than those of individual European countries, this accounts for the US new deaths curve having a flatter, plateau-ish peak. I think the virus will have cycled through most of the US by the end of this month or mid-June at the latest. That's why I'm optimistic about our upcoming football season.


Cal88, Korea has been doing extensive testing from Day 1. Look at their graph, after hitting 10,000 (isolated in one area of the country) their new cases dropped precipitously.

They continue to test widely and critically test asymptomatic people.

The key is that in Seoul, a city of 10 million people, only two people have died. There is no way they can have achieved herd immunity while 99% are testing negative and only 2 people in Seoul die in the process.

The experiments in "herd immunity" among developed countries are Sweden and the US. In the US we have over 75,000 dead already, the number of deaths per day flattened but did not diminish and now we are opening up in much of the country.
GivemTheAxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

Cal88 said:

Guys we're discussing resuming Cal football on the Football Board, please carry over the Trump discussion to the OT Board.
Thank you.


OK let's bring this back on topic.
Donald Trump is the Andy Buh of the American Presidents. Or is that comment unfair to Andy Buh?
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal84 said:

Very few believe that any country has herd immunity gained via exposure to the virus itself. However as has been discussed in other threads on this board there is some thinking that other vaccines and germ resistance can provide limited resistance to COVID19 in addition to their primary resistance target. The two most talked about vectors of resistance are tuberculosis and malaria.

The BCG vaccine for tuberculosis used to be mandatory throughout Western countries in the post-WW2 era. However all but two countries discontinued mandatory vaccination by the 1980s. The two countries that continue to have mandatory BCG vaccinations? South Korea and Japan. Oh, and Taiwan, albeit not technically a country. See a pattern there? All three have extremely low COVID19 rates, despite in the case of Japan being very lacksidaisical in testing/isolation.

The malaria angle has been touted as a therapeutic by the orange guy, but with at best mixed results. What is rarely discussed however is a correlation between malaria resistance and lower COVID19 incidence rates. Countries where malaria is common and where the population has developed some resistance to malaria, do seem to have lower COVID19 rates. While not really a functional option from a public policy standpoint (who wants to get malaria to avoid COVID19?), it is scientifically an interesting subplot.

Bottom line: RoK, Japan and RoC seem to have some herd immunity to COVID19 - but not due to direct exposure to the virus.


I was in Japan in January. There was a run on masks and sanitizer. Everyone wore masks, on the trains everyone wore gloves nobody touched surfaces. At the end of the line trains were sanitized. Nobody shakes hands or kisses in public anyway. People do not wear shoes in the house and they wash their hands religiously (literally). My daughter's company shutdown with pay in February. Rumor was 1 client in one of their many offices had coronavirus.

In Korea, it was all of the above plus massive testing of the general population to catch asymptomatic cases.

Look at SF with an early shutdown and only 1,800 cases and only 32 deaths.

It is actions that help slow the spread and can eliminate it. Trying to achieve "herd immunity" without a vaccine is crazy. Our death rate is already equivalent to a 911 terrorist attack every day going on for months at a time.

Richmondbear2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I just went to the CDC website, and right there on the front page they're showing 70k+ deaths. Rushnbear is a wingnut
Rushinbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Richmondbear2 said:

I just went to the CDC website, and right there on the front page they're showing 70k+ deaths. Rushnbear is a wingnut
Just trying to show the differences in data being published. Name calling doesn't become you.
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
> thread: Cal Football Unlikely

just released science fiction book-cover, but ignore that..

muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But we got this! So Excited!
Bring back It’s It’s to Haas Pavillion!
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oregon Shakespeare festival was going to resume in Sept. now they say the season is cancelled to comply with the Governor. A bad omen for Oregon Football
Bring back It’s It’s to Haas Pavillion!
BearinOC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

Oregon Shakespeare festival was going to resume in Sept. now they say the season is cancelled to comply with the Governor. A bad omen for Oregon Football
Heathens
bipolarbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The NFL posted their 2020 schedule yesterday with games starting in Sept. No word on any special restrictions re fans etc.
71Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bipolarbear said:

The NFL posted their 2020 schedule yesterday with games starting in Sept. No word on any special restrictions re fans etc.
The NFL has also said repeatedly that their plan is to play a full schedule even if that means delaying the opening of the season. They have a contingency plan in place to start the season in mid-October (with or with our fans in attendance), play without byes and eliminate the week off prior to the Super Bowl in order to complete the season and play the Super Bowl on Feb 28th.




kelly09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
62bear said:

IssyBear said:

Chabbear said:

The big elephant in the room is that without football revenues, other D-1 athletic programs die unless one of a few things happen:

1. Sport is fully endowed
2. College picks up the tab
3. Donations increase to support the sports kept.
4. Other revenues found.
5.???

Wild cards:
1. Title 9.
2. NCAA rules about the number of sports to remain eligible for D-1
3. Conference rules about sports that must be included to be in the conference (Pac 12: Football, Men and Women Basketball, Women Volleyball)
4. Tax support from Congress
5. ??




This is at a time when the university itself is having a tremendous loss of funding. Loss of student housing revenue is a real killer, costs to shift to on-line learning have been excessive, and with the State of California's own financial losses (we only get 40% of our education support from the state anyway) will prevent us from getting any help from Sacramento.

40% support for UC from the state? That number is a heck of a lot closer to 10%. Had not given enough thought to this topic to think about the shortfall from the lack of student housing fees. This is really going to turn the world of college on its head. How long until private schools of dubious quality start shutting down? What's the first "big name" private that isn't a for-profit commuter school to take a dirt nap? I'm thinking of places like Pacific.
Is there any issue with student visas for mainland China students relative to a fed ban. I suspect that would be a huge revenue hit.
UrsaMajor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kelly09 said:

62bear said:

IssyBear said:

Chabbear said:

The big elephant in the room is that without football revenues, other D-1 athletic programs die unless one of a few things happen:

1. Sport is fully endowed
2. College picks up the tab
3. Donations increase to support the sports kept.
4. Other revenues found.
5.???

Wild cards:
1. Title 9.
2. NCAA rules about the number of sports to remain eligible for D-1
3. Conference rules about sports that must be included to be in the conference (Pac 12: Football, Men and Women Basketball, Women Volleyball)
4. Tax support from Congress
5. ??




This is at a time when the university itself is having a tremendous loss of funding. Loss of student housing revenue is a real killer, costs to shift to on-line learning have been excessive, and with the State of California's own financial losses (we only get 40% of our education support from the state anyway) will prevent us from getting any help from Sacramento.

40% support for UC from the state? That number is a heck of a lot closer to 10%. Had not given enough thought to this topic to think about the shortfall from the lack of student housing fees. This is really going to turn the world of college on its head. How long until private schools of dubious quality start shutting down? What's the first "big name" private that isn't a for-profit commuter school to take a dirt nap? I'm thinking of places like Pacific.
Is there any issue with student visas for mainland China students relative to a fed ban. I suspect that would be a huge revenue hit.
It's a huge concern. Not only in terms of revenue, but many of the top research grad students and post-docs are from PRC. I know a number of researchers who won't go home to visit family because they're afraid they won't be able to get back.
Cal84
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Even if you can get back it's two months worth of quarantine on that round trip. Not worth it. No direct PRC-US flights so you have to go through HK. Two weeks quarantine in HK, two more in PRC on the outbound trip, then another four weeks on the return. Effective travel distance has essentially reverted to back to the pre-World War I era.
Creeping Incrementalism
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:


It is actions that help slow the spread and can eliminate it. Trying to achieve "herd immunity" without a vaccine is crazy.

Do you really think waiting for a vaccine is viable? From everything I've read, it would be a miracle to have one ready to go by next year and even then would society really be willing to let athletes get it first as production gets started? And it seems likely one won't ever be developed anytime soon if you consider the quickest vaccines that have been developed for new diseases is 4-5 years, and no coronavirus has ever yet had a vaccine developed! How long are people willing to wait for a vaccine?

At our current rate, we would be lucky to have a vaccine in time for the 2021 Fall season, and even that requires luck.

Like someone a few posts up said, even with testing, if just one person in an organization tests positive, to be appropriately cautious they would probably need to cancel at least the next week's game. That does not seem practical.

Another fact to consider is that based on the data from US Navy ships I have seen, of healthy mostly younger working age people, around 1 in 1000 infected men will die from this. So that is any one person's individual odds when they ask themselves if they are willing to risk this. And multiply that out for the total number of deaths.
Cave Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Creeping Incrementalism said:

Quote:


It is actions that help slow the spread and can eliminate it. Trying to achieve "herd immunity" without a vaccine is crazy.

Do you really think waiting for a vaccine is viable? From everything I've read, it would be a miracle to have one ready to go by next year and even then would society really be willing to let athletes get it first as production gets started? And it seems likely one won't ever be developed anytime soon if you consider the quickest vaccines that have been developed for new diseases is 4-5 years, and no coronavirus has ever yet had a vaccine developed! How long are people willing to wait for a vaccine?

At our current rate, we would be lucky to have a vaccine in time for the 2021 Fall season, and even that requires luck.

Like someone a few posts up said, even with testing, if just one person in an organization tests positive, to be appropriately cautious they would probably need to cancel at least the next week's game. That does not seem practical.

Another fact to consider is that based on the data from US Navy ships I have seen, of healthy mostly younger working age people, around 1 in 1000 infected men will die from this. So that is any one person's individual odds when they ask themselves if they are willing to risk this. And multiply that out for the total number of deaths.
Care to share this data? The official DOD numbers for active military personnel say just 2 deaths so far from 5171 cases. And of course as with all Covid case totals, the number of actual cases is likely to be significantly higher than the confirmed case count.

https://www.airforcemag.com/snapshot-dod-and-covid-19/
Grigsby
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rushinbear said:

71Bear said:

Rushinbear said:

LunchTime said:

Rushinbear said:

LunchTime said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence.




Cmon man. That's been debunked for awhile
I linked the image of the CDC form, with footnotes about a week ago. The 37,000 number has been made public much more recently. "Awhile" hasn't had time to transpire.
Ok first off, you do understand that your 37k stat is not accurate, correct?

second, things move fast in covid world. while you are spouting 37k deaths, the CDC is now projecting that by June, we could see 3000 deaths PER DAY
There is no accurate.

The CDC must be taken with a grain of salt, especially "projecting" and "we could see."
Sigh. Now you're making a whole different argument, which is fine I suppose.

Heres what you originally wrote: "No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence."

You were making the argument that the CDC was more or less incompetent because their so called "admission" that their original number of deaths was inaccurate. We now know the reason for the discrepancy (something you have yet to admit).

Now that you've been called out, you're now making a completely DIFFERENT argument that no numbers are accurate. Which is fine. I'm not going to argue with you there. But again, that's a completely different argument than you were making before.
what is the reason for the inaccuracy?
Just to be 100% clear:

37k is the death certificates gathered by the CDC. 60k is the notifications of death from individual health departments. Certificates lag behind by 1 to 8 weeks.

It's in the footnotes of what you cite.

There is no debate. They didnt "admit" two different numbers. They admit they are tracking deaths two ways.

It's the difference between counting a murder when the body is found with bullet holes in it, and when the corner signs the certificate. It's the difference between counting the corpses in a northern California town as you pick them up, and counting them 8 weeks later when the autopsy is done.

If you understand company's reporting, 60k is income, 37k is cash. A balance sheet, income, and cash flow all work together to build a picture. They are not conflicting views of the same information. They are the same information from different views.

37k and 60k are NOT conflicting numbers. Dont base so much emphasis on something that has literally no meaning.
How come CDC was reporting 60K last week? And, the footnotes in the CDC form I posted say that presumed deaths should be included. Plus, your timeline for autopsy reporting doesn't make sense.

I get the analogy to a company's financial reporting. The difference is that the earnings numbers come in shortly after the revenue. Here, you're purporting an 8 week lag. Is the govt that inefficient? (Oh, wait, did I just ask that?).
OK,

Above ALL, the CDC is still reporting 67,463 deaths (at 5/5/2020 10:15 pacific). They did NOT change their reporting. The added an additional resource. I believe that was a mistake, because a large percentage of the population is not educated enough to understand that there can be two methods to counting the same thing, at the same time.

Lets break this down potatohead style:

1. The CDC released a report showing 37k (now 39k) deaths. Everyone went wild about reporting adjustments to official numbers.

Here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

This number is the corner reported deaths.

It literally (as in literally) disclaims:
Quote:

NOTE: Number of deaths reported in this table are the total number of deaths received and coded as of the date of analysis and do not represent all deaths that occurred in that period.
and
Quote:

*Data during this period are incomplete because of the lag in time between when the death occurred and when the death certificate is completed, submitted to NCHS and processed for reporting purposes. This delay can range from 1 week to 8 weeks or more, depending on the jurisdiction, age, and cause of death.
emphasis mine

Presumed deaths are only counted if the corner reported COVID-19 as the cause of death (apparently ICD10 code U07.1). Presumed but not certificated deaths are not included.

2. The CDC also, still, has a report showing medical reported deaths. This is more timely.

here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html

This data is provided by the 55 Health Departments in the country, using a known case and death (through testing) and probable through meeting clinical criteria AND epidemiologic evidence.

This also has a disclaimer:
Quote:

In the event of a discrepancy between CDC cases and cases reported by state and local public health officials, data reported by states should be considered the most up to date.
This is the presumptive case count. The CDC gets the numbers reported from the 55 regional health systems, and aggregates them. As with my financial reporting analogy, there may be *some* bad debt that needs to be cleared, but it is more likely that they will revise revenue up as additional deferred revenue is paid.



As for the "Is the govt that inefficient?"
First; The government (CDC) is not that inefficient. It takes time to have a corner look at the people and confirm cause of death. Across 55 jurisdictions, the processes and timelines can be desperate. As Americans we demand this kind of decentralized government authority. But, the CDC still gives a centralized view of the totality: they dont make the data, they just collect and report the data, in this case.

Second; You think 1-8 weeks is a long time? Aapl takes about 5 weeks to report earnings. FedEx takes almost 13 weeks. My company takes about 8 weeks. VERY few companies turn around their data in less than 4 weeks.





FWIW, I agree with some of your points. Specifically that it is looking like a Swedish model may be a better model than our measures, and probably better than China's measures. I think the lockdown did not fundamentally impact mortality more significantly that less strict measures would have, but I have the luxury of not having to make that call, AND having an additional month and a half of data. Things are NOT better now (in California) than they were on March 22. They are MUCH worse (orders of magnitude more infected walking around, so more vectors for infection now), and we are relaxing measures. That tells me that my little opinion is shared by even the most careful people.

That doesnt change that your opener (37k vs 60k count adjustment) is just wrong in its assumption that they changed the numbers. They gave a new metric. TBH, you should absolutely drop the argument, because it is based on a misinterpretation of whatever you read. It also derails the point you are trying to make, by bringing in factually inaccurate arguments.

How many posts have you made espousing the core of your argument? Zero.
How many posts have you made arguing over a misinterpreted data point? 6. So far.
It's not which numbers are correct, but the discrepancy and its magnitude that erodes confidence.

Confidence is further eroded when we saw political leaders (including Trump) minimizing the infection in the early weeks and encouraging people to go about their lives as if nothing was happening. This was particularly true of Gov. Cuomo and his Director of Public Health pooh-poohing the danger and arguing that people had nothing to worry about. Pelosi's encouragement of attendance at the Chinese New Year (I think it was) celebration in SF didn't help her and her Party, either. And, if you have been paying attention, it can't have skipped your attention that both Fauci and Birx had been recorded supporting the Left/Dem perspective before the infection was uncovered. Granted, Fauci warned that Trump's first term would face an epidemic, but that was in the context of the history of every modern president having faced one. Still, he said it.

The data issue is further clouded by the presentation of Gov DeSantis of Florida when he announced the initial opening of the state last week. He presented figures which showed that the actual numbers on cases and deaths are 1/10 of what they were predicted to be and FL was not a lock-down state. It's stuff like that which makes the people wonder what they're bankrupting themselves personally for.

My biggest complaint is against those who deny that this thing came on fast, that President Trump took the first actions (CDC) before the first death in the US, that big states had foreclosed their readiness in favor of spending on pet social projects (even President Trump seems to have cleaned house in the epidemiological advisory group, although I took that as exercising his prerogative to put his own people in vs Obama's and I haven't followed whether he completed the transition there), that key leaders criticize him even while distracting him with impeachment and then stood in the way of action, and that there was no understanding in common about what we were facing.

Your presentation is persuasive on the merits of science and health practices, but it seems to ignore the social/political/economic context which infect them. I think everyone's doing a good job, except those who seem not to want a good job to be done.

As to financial reports, I was an implementation project manager for a financial management software company with over 1,000 clients. We had an interactive database across as many as 18 functions which gave real time calculations on big organizations (billion $ budgets). I could give you ye revenue and net figures in seconds and final reports in a day. It would take the finance team another couple days to meet and seal them. I suspect that the CDC and other databases are years out of date and slow, but that's no excuse.
The way to address a pandemic is by being proactive rather than reactive. Unless you are fully prepared to take immediate action (i.e., have all necessary supplies, including testing materials, ready to be disseminated across a wide geographic expanse, have all necessary plans to distribute and utilize those supplies in place, etc. etc.), once it manifests itself, it is too late. IMO, that Is where the incumbent President dropped the ball and the American public, in particular small business, is paying the price.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177


[url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177][/url]

Too late taking action?

Dec. 31 - China announced their CV19 investigation.
Jan. 7 - CDC established their incident management system.
Jan. 17 - CDC sends 100+ staff to screen all incoming Wuhan travelers at key airports.
Jan. 21 - CDC activated the emergency operations center.
Jan. 29 - President Trump established the Presidential CV19 Task Force.
Jan. 30 - President Trump declares travel ban to China.
Jan. 31 - WHO declared the virus an international contagion.
Jan. 31 - President Trump suspended entry into the US from China.
Jan. 31 - President Trump declared the Public Health Emergency.
Feb. 1 - President Trump bans all flights from China
etc.
etc.
Feb 29 - FIRST DEATH IN THE US FROM CV 19.

Each state was responsible to prepare itself and establish stores of equipment and supplies to confront a health emergency. Some did. That's never been the US govt.'s job - states rights and national govt must prepare for action with national admin/military re an epidemic. President Trump has repeatedly reported that the Obama administration left the cupboard bare. That has never been responsibly contradicted.

Meanwhile, the House Democrats were preoccupied with impeachment and did nothing.

Then, when impeachment failed, they repeatedly stalled President Trumps' efforts to take financial action. Having no further pretexts for undermining President Trump, this virus came as manna from Heaven for them.


Yikes, it is shocking how idiotic people are and how the education system in the US is woefully inadequate. It makes me wonder if Cal needs a better screening process, because your ability to think critically is non-existent.

You do realize that your timeline is like telling a story and removing all the parts that don't fit with your agenda.

Ahh yes the famous Trump travel ban from China, which might be the greatest sham ever, because it's not like someone from China couldn't just fly from China to the EU//UK and then the US.

Oh wait they could do just that .....

Frankly, you should be embarrassed at your complete and utter lack of reasoning.

Rushinbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Grigsby said:

Rushinbear said:

71Bear said:

Rushinbear said:

LunchTime said:

Rushinbear said:

LunchTime said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence.




Cmon man. That's been debunked for awhile
I linked the image of the CDC form, with footnotes about a week ago. The 37,000 number has been made public much more recently. "Awhile" hasn't had time to transpire.
Ok first off, you do understand that your 37k stat is not accurate, correct?

second, things move fast in covid world. while you are spouting 37k deaths, the CDC is now projecting that by June, we could see 3000 deaths PER DAY
There is no accurate.

The CDC must be taken with a grain of salt, especially "projecting" and "we could see."
Sigh. Now you're making a whole different argument, which is fine I suppose.

Heres what you originally wrote: "No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence."

You were making the argument that the CDC was more or less incompetent because their so called "admission" that their original number of deaths was inaccurate. We now know the reason for the discrepancy (something you have yet to admit).

Now that you've been called out, you're now making a completely DIFFERENT argument that no numbers are accurate. Which is fine. I'm not going to argue with you there. But again, that's a completely different argument than you were making before.
what is the reason for the inaccuracy?
Just to be 100% clear:

37k is the death certificates gathered by the CDC. 60k is the notifications of death from individual health departments. Certificates lag behind by 1 to 8 weeks.

It's in the footnotes of what you cite.

There is no debate. They didnt "admit" two different numbers. They admit they are tracking deaths two ways.

It's the difference between counting a murder when the body is found with bullet holes in it, and when the corner signs the certificate. It's the difference between counting the corpses in a northern California town as you pick them up, and counting them 8 weeks later when the autopsy is done.

If you understand company's reporting, 60k is income, 37k is cash. A balance sheet, income, and cash flow all work together to build a picture. They are not conflicting views of the same information. They are the same information from different views.

37k and 60k are NOT conflicting numbers. Dont base so much emphasis on something that has literally no meaning.
How come CDC was reporting 60K last week? And, the footnotes in the CDC form I posted say that presumed deaths should be included. Plus, your timeline for autopsy reporting doesn't make sense.

I get the analogy to a company's financial reporting. The difference is that the earnings numbers come in shortly after the revenue. Here, you're purporting an 8 week lag. Is the govt that inefficient? (Oh, wait, did I just ask that?).
OK,

Above ALL, the CDC is still reporting 67,463 deaths (at 5/5/2020 10:15 pacific). They did NOT change their reporting. The added an additional resource. I believe that was a mistake, because a large percentage of the population is not educated enough to understand that there can be two methods to counting the same thing, at the same time.

Lets break this down potatohead style:

1. The CDC released a report showing 37k (now 39k) deaths. Everyone went wild about reporting adjustments to official numbers.

Here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

This number is the corner reported deaths.

It literally (as in literally) disclaims:
Quote:

NOTE: Number of deaths reported in this table are the total number of deaths received and coded as of the date of analysis and do not represent all deaths that occurred in that period.
and
Quote:

*Data during this period are incomplete because of the lag in time between when the death occurred and when the death certificate is completed, submitted to NCHS and processed for reporting purposes. This delay can range from 1 week to 8 weeks or more, depending on the jurisdiction, age, and cause of death.
emphasis mine

Presumed deaths are only counted if the corner reported COVID-19 as the cause of death (apparently ICD10 code U07.1). Presumed but not certificated deaths are not included.

2. The CDC also, still, has a report showing medical reported deaths. This is more timely.

here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html

This data is provided by the 55 Health Departments in the country, using a known case and death (through testing) and probable through meeting clinical criteria AND epidemiologic evidence.

This also has a disclaimer:
Quote:

In the event of a discrepancy between CDC cases and cases reported by state and local public health officials, data reported by states should be considered the most up to date.
This is the presumptive case count. The CDC gets the numbers reported from the 55 regional health systems, and aggregates them. As with my financial reporting analogy, there may be *some* bad debt that needs to be cleared, but it is more likely that they will revise revenue up as additional deferred revenue is paid.



As for the "Is the govt that inefficient?"
First; The government (CDC) is not that inefficient. It takes time to have a corner look at the people and confirm cause of death. Across 55 jurisdictions, the processes and timelines can be desperate. As Americans we demand this kind of decentralized government authority. But, the CDC still gives a centralized view of the totality: they dont make the data, they just collect and report the data, in this case.

Second; You think 1-8 weeks is a long time? Aapl takes about 5 weeks to report earnings. FedEx takes almost 13 weeks. My company takes about 8 weeks. VERY few companies turn around their data in less than 4 weeks.





FWIW, I agree with some of your points. Specifically that it is looking like a Swedish model may be a better model than our measures, and probably better than China's measures. I think the lockdown did not fundamentally impact mortality more significantly that less strict measures would have, but I have the luxury of not having to make that call, AND having an additional month and a half of data. Things are NOT better now (in California) than they were on March 22. They are MUCH worse (orders of magnitude more infected walking around, so more vectors for infection now), and we are relaxing measures. That tells me that my little opinion is shared by even the most careful people.

That doesnt change that your opener (37k vs 60k count adjustment) is just wrong in its assumption that they changed the numbers. They gave a new metric. TBH, you should absolutely drop the argument, because it is based on a misinterpretation of whatever you read. It also derails the point you are trying to make, by bringing in factually inaccurate arguments.

How many posts have you made espousing the core of your argument? Zero.
How many posts have you made arguing over a misinterpreted data point? 6. So far.
It's not which numbers are correct, but the discrepancy and its magnitude that erodes confidence.

Confidence is further eroded when we saw political leaders (including Trump) minimizing the infection in the early weeks and encouraging people to go about their lives as if nothing was happening. This was particularly true of Gov. Cuomo and his Director of Public Health pooh-poohing the danger and arguing that people had nothing to worry about. Pelosi's encouragement of attendance at the Chinese New Year (I think it was) celebration in SF didn't help her and her Party, either. And, if you have been paying attention, it can't have skipped your attention that both Fauci and Birx had been recorded supporting the Left/Dem perspective before the infection was uncovered. Granted, Fauci warned that Trump's first term would face an epidemic, but that was in the context of the history of every modern president having faced one. Still, he said it.

The data issue is further clouded by the presentation of Gov DeSantis of Florida when he announced the initial opening of the state last week. He presented figures which showed that the actual numbers on cases and deaths are 1/10 of what they were predicted to be and FL was not a lock-down state. It's stuff like that which makes the people wonder what they're bankrupting themselves personally for.

My biggest complaint is against those who deny that this thing came on fast, that President Trump took the first actions (CDC) before the first death in the US, that big states had foreclosed their readiness in favor of spending on pet social projects (even President Trump seems to have cleaned house in the epidemiological advisory group, although I took that as exercising his prerogative to put his own people in vs Obama's and I haven't followed whether he completed the transition there), that key leaders criticize him even while distracting him with impeachment and then stood in the way of action, and that there was no understanding in common about what we were facing.

Your presentation is persuasive on the merits of science and health practices, but it seems to ignore the social/political/economic context which infect them. I think everyone's doing a good job, except those who seem not to want a good job to be done.

As to financial reports, I was an implementation project manager for a financial management software company with over 1,000 clients. We had an interactive database across as many as 18 functions which gave real time calculations on big organizations (billion $ budgets). I could give you ye revenue and net figures in seconds and final reports in a day. It would take the finance team another couple days to meet and seal them. I suspect that the CDC and other databases are years out of date and slow, but that's no excuse.
The way to address a pandemic is by being proactive rather than reactive. Unless you are fully prepared to take immediate action (i.e., have all necessary supplies, including testing materials, ready to be disseminated across a wide geographic expanse, have all necessary plans to distribute and utilize those supplies in place, etc. etc.), once it manifests itself, it is too late. IMO, that Is where the incumbent President dropped the ball and the American public, in particular small business, is paying the price.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177


[url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177][/url]

Too late taking action?

Dec. 31 - China announced their CV19 investigation.
Jan. 7 - CDC established their incident management system.
Jan. 17 - CDC sends 100+ staff to screen all incoming Wuhan travelers at key airports.
Jan. 21 - CDC activated the emergency operations center.
Jan. 29 - President Trump established the Presidential CV19 Task Force.
Jan. 30 - President Trump declares travel ban to China.
Jan. 31 - WHO declared the virus an international contagion.
Jan. 31 - President Trump suspended entry into the US from China.
Jan. 31 - President Trump declared the Public Health Emergency.
Feb. 1 - President Trump bans all flights from China
etc.
etc.
Feb 29 - FIRST DEATH IN THE US FROM CV 19.

Each state was responsible to prepare itself and establish stores of equipment and supplies to confront a health emergency. Some did. That's never been the US govt.'s job - states rights and national govt must prepare for action with national admin/military re an epidemic. President Trump has repeatedly reported that the Obama administration left the cupboard bare. That has never been responsibly contradicted.

Meanwhile, the House Democrats were preoccupied with impeachment and did nothing.

Then, when impeachment failed, they repeatedly stalled President Trumps' efforts to take financial action. Having no further pretexts for undermining President Trump, this virus came as manna from Heaven for them.


Yikes, it is shocking how idiotic people are and how the education system in the US is woefully inadequate. It makes me wonder if Cal needs a better screening process, because your ability to think critically is non-existent.

You do realize that your timeline is like telling a story and removing all the parts that don't fit with your agenda.

Ahh yes the famous Trump travel ban from China, which might be the greatest sham ever, because it's not like someone from China couldn't just fly from China to the EU//UK and then the US.

Oh wait they could do just that .....

Frankly, you should be embarrassed at your complete and utter lack of reasoning.


Piss poor attempt at avoiding a direct response by distracting from it. I take it then that you don't dispute President Trump's having done those things. The accusation was that he was too late in taking action. I presented evidence that he took action before even the first death in the US.

No one's perfect (except you?), but he's done a lot in the face of conflicting opinions and evidence, a distracting impeachment effort by the Democrats that went nowhere and charges that some of the top scientists show signs of straddling the fence.

What we did was to buy time to get testing, treatments and vaccine research underway before we restarted the economy. Some will find fault if there is even one death, including acceptance of evidence that deaths caused by other means could be presumed to have been caused by 19 instead.

This is a mess that we're clawing our way out of, but it doesn't help to throw dust in the air and attack with name-calling. Luckily for the USA, the opinions of you and others who think as you do are being discarded in favor of common sense. I'm still protecting myself and those around me and I hope you do, too.
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Creeping Incrementalism said:

> Another fact to consider is that based on the data from US Navy ships I have seen, of healthy mostly younger working age people, around 1 in 1000 infected men will die from this.
good to remember, thanks CI [ umm, known to friends as Creep? ]

given younger men (women?) are bearly at risk, howsabout open wide Memorial/Haas/etc gates if and only if fans are young enough, suitably defined?

deep pocket old blues, so sorry, fugettaboutit.

# singing those lowdown / stuck home vaaccccination Blues
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
Grigsby
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rushinbear said:

Grigsby said:

Rushinbear said:

71Bear said:

Rushinbear said:

LunchTime said:

Rushinbear said:

LunchTime said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence.




Cmon man. That's been debunked for awhile
I linked the image of the CDC form, with footnotes about a week ago. The 37,000 number has been made public much more recently. "Awhile" hasn't had time to transpire.
Ok first off, you do understand that your 37k stat is not accurate, correct?

second, things move fast in covid world. while you are spouting 37k deaths, the CDC is now projecting that by June, we could see 3000 deaths PER DAY
There is no accurate.

The CDC must be taken with a grain of salt, especially "projecting" and "we could see."
Sigh. Now you're making a whole different argument, which is fine I suppose.

Heres what you originally wrote: "No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence."

You were making the argument that the CDC was more or less incompetent because their so called "admission" that their original number of deaths was inaccurate. We now know the reason for the discrepancy (something you have yet to admit).

Now that you've been called out, you're now making a completely DIFFERENT argument that no numbers are accurate. Which is fine. I'm not going to argue with you there. But again, that's a completely different argument than you were making before.
what is the reason for the inaccuracy?
Just to be 100% clear:

37k is the death certificates gathered by the CDC. 60k is the notifications of death from individual health departments. Certificates lag behind by 1 to 8 weeks.

It's in the footnotes of what you cite.

There is no debate. They didnt "admit" two different numbers. They admit they are tracking deaths two ways.

It's the difference between counting a murder when the body is found with bullet holes in it, and when the corner signs the certificate. It's the difference between counting the corpses in a northern California town as you pick them up, and counting them 8 weeks later when the autopsy is done.

If you understand company's reporting, 60k is income, 37k is cash. A balance sheet, income, and cash flow all work together to build a picture. They are not conflicting views of the same information. They are the same information from different views.

37k and 60k are NOT conflicting numbers. Dont base so much emphasis on something that has literally no meaning.
How come CDC was reporting 60K last week? And, the footnotes in the CDC form I posted say that presumed deaths should be included. Plus, your timeline for autopsy reporting doesn't make sense.

I get the analogy to a company's financial reporting. The difference is that the earnings numbers come in shortly after the revenue. Here, you're purporting an 8 week lag. Is the govt that inefficient? (Oh, wait, did I just ask that?).
OK,

Above ALL, the CDC is still reporting 67,463 deaths (at 5/5/2020 10:15 pacific). They did NOT change their reporting. The added an additional resource. I believe that was a mistake, because a large percentage of the population is not educated enough to understand that there can be two methods to counting the same thing, at the same time.

Lets break this down potatohead style:

1. The CDC released a report showing 37k (now 39k) deaths. Everyone went wild about reporting adjustments to official numbers.

Here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

This number is the corner reported deaths.

It literally (as in literally) disclaims:
Quote:

NOTE: Number of deaths reported in this table are the total number of deaths received and coded as of the date of analysis and do not represent all deaths that occurred in that period.
and
Quote:

*Data during this period are incomplete because of the lag in time between when the death occurred and when the death certificate is completed, submitted to NCHS and processed for reporting purposes. This delay can range from 1 week to 8 weeks or more, depending on the jurisdiction, age, and cause of death.
emphasis mine

Presumed deaths are only counted if the corner reported COVID-19 as the cause of death (apparently ICD10 code U07.1). Presumed but not certificated deaths are not included.

2. The CDC also, still, has a report showing medical reported deaths. This is more timely.

here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html

This data is provided by the 55 Health Departments in the country, using a known case and death (through testing) and probable through meeting clinical criteria AND epidemiologic evidence.

This also has a disclaimer:
Quote:

In the event of a discrepancy between CDC cases and cases reported by state and local public health officials, data reported by states should be considered the most up to date.
This is the presumptive case count. The CDC gets the numbers reported from the 55 regional health systems, and aggregates them. As with my financial reporting analogy, there may be *some* bad debt that needs to be cleared, but it is more likely that they will revise revenue up as additional deferred revenue is paid.



As for the "Is the govt that inefficient?"
First; The government (CDC) is not that inefficient. It takes time to have a corner look at the people and confirm cause of death. Across 55 jurisdictions, the processes and timelines can be desperate. As Americans we demand this kind of decentralized government authority. But, the CDC still gives a centralized view of the totality: they dont make the data, they just collect and report the data, in this case.

Second; You think 1-8 weeks is a long time? Aapl takes about 5 weeks to report earnings. FedEx takes almost 13 weeks. My company takes about 8 weeks. VERY few companies turn around their data in less than 4 weeks.





FWIW, I agree with some of your points. Specifically that it is looking like a Swedish model may be a better model than our measures, and probably better than China's measures. I think the lockdown did not fundamentally impact mortality more significantly that less strict measures would have, but I have the luxury of not having to make that call, AND having an additional month and a half of data. Things are NOT better now (in California) than they were on March 22. They are MUCH worse (orders of magnitude more infected walking around, so more vectors for infection now), and we are relaxing measures. That tells me that my little opinion is shared by even the most careful people.

That doesnt change that your opener (37k vs 60k count adjustment) is just wrong in its assumption that they changed the numbers. They gave a new metric. TBH, you should absolutely drop the argument, because it is based on a misinterpretation of whatever you read. It also derails the point you are trying to make, by bringing in factually inaccurate arguments.

How many posts have you made espousing the core of your argument? Zero.
How many posts have you made arguing over a misinterpreted data point? 6. So far.
It's not which numbers are correct, but the discrepancy and its magnitude that erodes confidence.

Confidence is further eroded when we saw political leaders (including Trump) minimizing the infection in the early weeks and encouraging people to go about their lives as if nothing was happening. This was particularly true of Gov. Cuomo and his Director of Public Health pooh-poohing the danger and arguing that people had nothing to worry about. Pelosi's encouragement of attendance at the Chinese New Year (I think it was) celebration in SF didn't help her and her Party, either. And, if you have been paying attention, it can't have skipped your attention that both Fauci and Birx had been recorded supporting the Left/Dem perspective before the infection was uncovered. Granted, Fauci warned that Trump's first term would face an epidemic, but that was in the context of the history of every modern president having faced one. Still, he said it.

The data issue is further clouded by the presentation of Gov DeSantis of Florida when he announced the initial opening of the state last week. He presented figures which showed that the actual numbers on cases and deaths are 1/10 of what they were predicted to be and FL was not a lock-down state. It's stuff like that which makes the people wonder what they're bankrupting themselves personally for.

My biggest complaint is against those who deny that this thing came on fast, that President Trump took the first actions (CDC) before the first death in the US, that big states had foreclosed their readiness in favor of spending on pet social projects (even President Trump seems to have cleaned house in the epidemiological advisory group, although I took that as exercising his prerogative to put his own people in vs Obama's and I haven't followed whether he completed the transition there), that key leaders criticize him even while distracting him with impeachment and then stood in the way of action, and that there was no understanding in common about what we were facing.

Your presentation is persuasive on the merits of science and health practices, but it seems to ignore the social/political/economic context which infect them. I think everyone's doing a good job, except those who seem not to want a good job to be done.

As to financial reports, I was an implementation project manager for a financial management software company with over 1,000 clients. We had an interactive database across as many as 18 functions which gave real time calculations on big organizations (billion $ budgets). I could give you ye revenue and net figures in seconds and final reports in a day. It would take the finance team another couple days to meet and seal them. I suspect that the CDC and other databases are years out of date and slow, but that's no excuse.
The way to address a pandemic is by being proactive rather than reactive. Unless you are fully prepared to take immediate action (i.e., have all necessary supplies, including testing materials, ready to be disseminated across a wide geographic expanse, have all necessary plans to distribute and utilize those supplies in place, etc. etc.), once it manifests itself, it is too late. IMO, that Is where the incumbent President dropped the ball and the American public, in particular small business, is paying the price.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177


[url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177][/url]

Too late taking action?

Dec. 31 - China announced their CV19 investigation.
Jan. 7 - CDC established their incident management system.
Jan. 17 - CDC sends 100+ staff to screen all incoming Wuhan travelers at key airports.
Jan. 21 - CDC activated the emergency operations center.
Jan. 29 - President Trump established the Presidential CV19 Task Force.
Jan. 30 - President Trump declares travel ban to China.
Jan. 31 - WHO declared the virus an international contagion.
Jan. 31 - President Trump suspended entry into the US from China.
Jan. 31 - President Trump declared the Public Health Emergency.
Feb. 1 - President Trump bans all flights from China
etc.
etc.
Feb 29 - FIRST DEATH IN THE US FROM CV 19.

Each state was responsible to prepare itself and establish stores of equipment and supplies to confront a health emergency. Some did. That's never been the US govt.'s job - states rights and national govt must prepare for action with national admin/military re an epidemic. President Trump has repeatedly reported that the Obama administration left the cupboard bare. That has never been responsibly contradicted.

Meanwhile, the House Democrats were preoccupied with impeachment and did nothing.

Then, when impeachment failed, they repeatedly stalled President Trumps' efforts to take financial action. Having no further pretexts for undermining President Trump, this virus came as manna from Heaven for them.


Yikes, it is shocking how idiotic people are and how the education system in the US is woefully inadequate. It makes me wonder if Cal needs a better screening process, because your ability to think critically is non-existent.

You do realize that your timeline is like telling a story and removing all the parts that don't fit with your agenda.

Ahh yes the famous Trump travel ban from China, which might be the greatest sham ever, because it's not like someone from China couldn't just fly from China to the EU//UK and then the US.

Oh wait they could do just that .....

Frankly, you should be embarrassed at your complete and utter lack of reasoning.


Piss poor attempt at avoiding a direct response by distracting from it. I take it then that you don't dispute President Trump's having done those things. The accusation was that he was too late in taking action. I presented evidence that he took action before even the first death in the US.

No one's perfect (except you?), but he's done a lot in the face of conflicting opinions and evidence, a distracting impeachment effort by the Democrats that went nowhere and charges that some of the top scientists show signs of straddling the fence.

What we did was to buy time to get testing, treatments and vaccine research underway before we restarted the economy. Some will find fault if there is even one death, including acceptance of evidence that deaths caused by other means could be presumed to have been caused by 19 instead.

This is a mess that we're clawing our way out of, but it doesn't help to throw dust in the air and attack with name-calling. Luckily for the USA, the opinions of you and others who think as you do are being discarded in favor of common sense. I'm still protecting myself and those around me and I hope you do, too.


Trump has done jack ***** I simply suggested that your timeline was full of **** and I am not going waste time disputing each of the lies half truths that Trump has propagated because it would take years to unravel all of that *****


Not to mention the purported claims of action are horse*****
What is the point of calling an emergency and then completely downplaying the severity, or then refusing to prepare until **** already had hit the fan.

Why declare a state of emergency then claim a month later that there are 15 cases and that they will go to none.

This isn't about perfection. It's about responsibility and doing one's job. Not protecting one's self interest and exposing millions to disease, poverty and famine to protect the crony capitalistic agenda of 1%.

Again I will call bull**** on your claims. What did impeachment have to do when Trump was out gallivanting on the golf course and going to his rallies throughout February and March doing sweet **** all. Oh unless you count putting his grifter son in law in charge of a task force , which he has no business running, and committing acts of piracy against US states.

Oh, for the record I'm not a fan if the Democrats either. The whole system is a sham and completely undermines the responsibility to protect the citizenry.

It is completely how to be def many of Americans are to how the rest of the world views this country. But let me guess we're #1 why should we care what the rest of world thinks, right?


CalAlumnus13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe I'm being simple-minded, but couldn't teams just put their players (and coaches) in total isolation, except for their teammates and coaches, starting 8 weeks before the season? Sequester them, similar to how they do in hotels the night before a game.

No friends, no family, no girls. Class lectures on Zoom. No leaving the facilities--all meals on-site. Heck, maybe use ankle bracelets (South Korea does this). You break quarantine, you don't play--and you have to isolate from the team for 14 days before being allowed back in team facilities.

A lot of non-athlete undergrads will be taking a gap year, opening up housing space... Can the team take over all of Bowles Hall or a Unit 1 building for the season?

Harsh, but given the choice between this and not having a season, I think a lot of players would choose this.
Goobear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Grigsby said:

Rushinbear said:

Grigsby said:

Rushinbear said:

71Bear said:

Rushinbear said:

LunchTime said:

Rushinbear said:

LunchTime said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence.




Cmon man. That's been debunked for awhile
I linked the image of the CDC form, with footnotes about a week ago. The 37,000 number has been made public much more recently. "Awhile" hasn't had time to transpire.
Ok first off, you do understand that your 37k stat is not accurate, correct?

second, things move fast in covid world. while you are spouting 37k deaths, the CDC is now projecting that by June, we could see 3000 deaths PER DAY
There is no accurate.

The CDC must be taken with a grain of salt, especially "projecting" and "we could see."
Sigh. Now you're making a whole different argument, which is fine I suppose.

Heres what you originally wrote: "No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence."

You were making the argument that the CDC was more or less incompetent because their so called "admission" that their original number of deaths was inaccurate. We now know the reason for the discrepancy (something you have yet to admit).

Now that you've been called out, you're now making a completely DIFFERENT argument that no numbers are accurate. Which is fine. I'm not going to argue with you there. But again, that's a completely different argument than you were making before.
what is the reason for the inaccuracy?
Just to be 100% clear:

37k is the death certificates gathered by the CDC. 60k is the notifications of death from individual health departments. Certificates lag behind by 1 to 8 weeks.

It's in the footnotes of what you cite.

There is no debate. They didnt "admit" two different numbers. They admit they are tracking deaths two ways.

It's the difference between counting a murder when the body is found with bullet holes in it, and when the corner signs the certificate. It's the difference between counting the corpses in a northern California town as you pick them up, and counting them 8 weeks later when the autopsy is done.

If you understand company's reporting, 60k is income, 37k is cash. A balance sheet, income, and cash flow all work together to build a picture. They are not conflicting views of the same information. They are the same information from different views.

37k and 60k are NOT conflicting numbers. Dont base so much emphasis on something that has literally no meaning.
How come CDC was reporting 60K last week? And, the footnotes in the CDC form I posted say that presumed deaths should be included. Plus, your timeline for autopsy reporting doesn't make sense.

I get the analogy to a company's financial reporting. The difference is that the earnings numbers come in shortly after the revenue. Here, you're purporting an 8 week lag. Is the govt that inefficient? (Oh, wait, did I just ask that?).
OK,

Above ALL, the CDC is still reporting 67,463 deaths (at 5/5/2020 10:15 pacific). They did NOT change their reporting. The added an additional resource. I believe that was a mistake, because a large percentage of the population is not educated enough to understand that there can be two methods to counting the same thing, at the same time.

Lets break this down potatohead style:

1. The CDC released a report showing 37k (now 39k) deaths. Everyone went wild about reporting adjustments to official numbers.

Here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

This number is the corner reported deaths.

It literally (as in literally) disclaims:
Quote:

NOTE: Number of deaths reported in this table are the total number of deaths received and coded as of the date of analysis and do not represent all deaths that occurred in that period.
and
Quote:

*Data during this period are incomplete because of the lag in time between when the death occurred and when the death certificate is completed, submitted to NCHS and processed for reporting purposes. This delay can range from 1 week to 8 weeks or more, depending on the jurisdiction, age, and cause of death.
emphasis mine

Presumed deaths are only counted if the corner reported COVID-19 as the cause of death (apparently ICD10 code U07.1). Presumed but not certificated deaths are not included.

2. The CDC also, still, has a report showing medical reported deaths. This is more timely.

here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html

This data is provided by the 55 Health Departments in the country, using a known case and death (through testing) and probable through meeting clinical criteria AND epidemiologic evidence.

This also has a disclaimer:
Quote:

In the event of a discrepancy between CDC cases and cases reported by state and local public health officials, data reported by states should be considered the most up to date.
This is the presumptive case count. The CDC gets the numbers reported from the 55 regional health systems, and aggregates them. As with my financial reporting analogy, there may be *some* bad debt that needs to be cleared, but it is more likely that they will revise revenue up as additional deferred revenue is paid.



As for the "Is the govt that inefficient?"
First; The government (CDC) is not that inefficient. It takes time to have a corner look at the people and confirm cause of death. Across 55 jurisdictions, the processes and timelines can be desperate. As Americans we demand this kind of decentralized government authority. But, the CDC still gives a centralized view of the totality: they dont make the data, they just collect and report the data, in this case.

Second; You think 1-8 weeks is a long time? Aapl takes about 5 weeks to report earnings. FedEx takes almost 13 weeks. My company takes about 8 weeks. VERY few companies turn around their data in less than 4 weeks.





FWIW, I agree with some of your points. Specifically that it is looking like a Swedish model may be a better model than our measures, and probably better than China's measures. I think the lockdown did not fundamentally impact mortality more significantly that less strict measures would have, but I have the luxury of not having to make that call, AND having an additional month and a half of data. Things are NOT better now (in California) than they were on March 22. They are MUCH worse (orders of magnitude more infected walking around, so more vectors for infection now), and we are relaxing measures. That tells me that my little opinion is shared by even the most careful people.

That doesnt change that your opener (37k vs 60k count adjustment) is just wrong in its assumption that they changed the numbers. They gave a new metric. TBH, you should absolutely drop the argument, because it is based on a misinterpretation of whatever you read. It also derails the point you are trying to make, by bringing in factually inaccurate arguments.

How many posts have you made espousing the core of your argument? Zero.
How many posts have you made arguing over a misinterpreted data point? 6. So far.
It's not which numbers are correct, but the discrepancy and its magnitude that erodes confidence.

Confidence is further eroded when we saw political leaders (including Trump) minimizing the infection in the early weeks and encouraging people to go about their lives as if nothing was happening. This was particularly true of Gov. Cuomo and his Director of Public Health pooh-poohing the danger and arguing that people had nothing to worry about. Pelosi's encouragement of attendance at the Chinese New Year (I think it was) celebration in SF didn't help her and her Party, either. And, if you have been paying attention, it can't have skipped your attention that both Fauci and Birx had been recorded supporting the Left/Dem perspective before the infection was uncovered. Granted, Fauci warned that Trump's first term would face an epidemic, but that was in the context of the history of every modern president having faced one. Still, he said it.

The data issue is further clouded by the presentation of Gov DeSantis of Florida when he announced the initial opening of the state last week. He presented figures which showed that the actual numbers on cases and deaths are 1/10 of what they were predicted to be and FL was not a lock-down state. It's stuff like that which makes the people wonder what they're bankrupting themselves personally for.

My biggest complaint is against those who deny that this thing came on fast, that President Trump took the first actions (CDC) before the first death in the US, that big states had foreclosed their readiness in favor of spending on pet social projects (even President Trump seems to have cleaned house in the epidemiological advisory group, although I took that as exercising his prerogative to put his own people in vs Obama's and I haven't followed whether he completed the transition there), that key leaders criticize him even while distracting him with impeachment and then stood in the way of action, and that there was no understanding in common about what we were facing.

Your presentation is persuasive on the merits of science and health practices, but it seems to ignore the social/political/economic context which infect them. I think everyone's doing a good job, except those who seem not to want a good job to be done.

As to financial reports, I was an implementation project manager for a financial management software company with over 1,000 clients. We had an interactive database across as many as 18 functions which gave real time calculations on big organizations (billion $ budgets). I could give you ye revenue and net figures in seconds and final reports in a day. It would take the finance team another couple days to meet and seal them. I suspect that the CDC and other databases are years out of date and slow, but that's no excuse.
The way to address a pandemic is by being proactive rather than reactive. Unless you are fully prepared to take immediate action (i.e., have all necessary supplies, including testing materials, ready to be disseminated across a wide geographic expanse, have all necessary plans to distribute and utilize those supplies in place, etc. etc.), once it manifests itself, it is too late. IMO, that Is where the incumbent President dropped the ball and the American public, in particular small business, is paying the price.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177


[url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177][/url]

Too late taking action?

Dec. 31 - China announced their CV19 investigation.
Jan. 7 - CDC established their incident management system.
Jan. 17 - CDC sends 100+ staff to screen all incoming Wuhan travelers at key airports.
Jan. 21 - CDC activated the emergency operations center.
Jan. 29 - President Trump established the Presidential CV19 Task Force.
Jan. 30 - President Trump declares travel ban to China.
Jan. 31 - WHO declared the virus an international contagion.
Jan. 31 - President Trump suspended entry into the US from China.
Jan. 31 - President Trump declared the Public Health Emergency.
Feb. 1 - President Trump bans all flights from China
etc.
etc.
Feb 29 - FIRST DEATH IN THE US FROM CV 19.

Each state was responsible to prepare itself and establish stores of equipment and supplies to confront a health emergency. Some did. That's never been the US govt.'s job - states rights and national govt must prepare for action with national admin/military re an epidemic. President Trump has repeatedly reported that the Obama administration left the cupboard bare. That has never been responsibly contradicted.

Meanwhile, the House Democrats were preoccupied with impeachment and did nothing.

Then, when impeachment failed, they repeatedly stalled President Trumps' efforts to take financial action. Having no further pretexts for undermining President Trump, this virus came as manna from Heaven for them.


Yikes, it is shocking how idiotic people are and how the education system in the US is woefully inadequate. It makes me wonder if Cal needs a better screening process, because your ability to think critically is non-existent.

You do realize that your timeline is like telling a story and removing all the parts that don't fit with your agenda.

Ahh yes the famous Trump travel ban from China, which might be the greatest sham ever, because it's not like someone from China couldn't just fly from China to the EU//UK and then the US.

Oh wait they could do just that .....

Frankly, you should be embarrassed at your complete and utter lack of reasoning.


Piss poor attempt at avoiding a direct response by distracting from it. I take it then that you don't dispute President Trump's having done those things. The accusation was that he was too late in taking action. I presented evidence that he took action before even the first death in the US.

No one's perfect (except you?), but he's done a lot in the face of conflicting opinions and evidence, a distracting impeachment effort by the Democrats that went nowhere and charges that some of the top scientists show signs of straddling the fence.

What we did was to buy time to get testing, treatments and vaccine research underway before we restarted the economy. Some will find fault if there is even one death, including acceptance of evidence that deaths caused by other means could be presumed to have been caused by 19 instead.

This is a mess that we're clawing our way out of, but it doesn't help to throw dust in the air and attack with name-calling. Luckily for the USA, the opinions of you and others who think as you do are being discarded in favor of common sense. I'm still protecting myself and those around me and I hope you do, too.


Trump has done jack ***** I simply suggested that your timeline was full of **** and I am not going waste time disputing each of the lies half truths that Trump has propagated because it would take years to unravel all of that *****


Not to mention the purported claims of action are horse*****
What is the point of calling an emergency and then completely downplaying the severity, or then refusing to prepare until **** already had hit the fan.

Why declare a state of emergency then claim a month later that there are 15 cases and that they will go to none.

This isn't about perfection. It's about responsibility and doing one's job. Not protecting one's self interest and exposing millions to disease, poverty and famine to protect the crony capitalistic agenda of 1%.

Again I will call bull**** on your claims. What did impeachment have to do when Trump was out gallivanting on the golf course and going to his rallies throughout February and March doing sweet **** all. Oh unless you count putting his grifter son in law in charge of a task force , which he has no business running, and committing acts of piracy against US states.

Oh, for the record I'm not a fan if the Democrats either. The whole system is a sham and completely undermines the responsibility to protect the citizenry.

It is completely how to be def many of Americans are to how the rest of the world views this country. But let me guess we're #1 why should we care what the rest of world thinks, right?



I am from Western Europe. My family lives there and the press there definitely don't show an unbiased approach towards the USA. Policies they laugh at Trump does to reallocate money they do themselves. Also Holland does basically what the US does. However, politics are out of their Covid management. Holland is also 1/10 the size of California and has 45% of the population. Elementary schools are going to be opened. They have worse statistics than the USA. Germany is doing great and soccer competition is going to resume next week. By the way California has better statistics than Germany..Gavin needs to tell those counties in Nor Cal to go the phase 3 and he better keep Tesla. He needs money to pay for all those programs we are funding.
71Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Goobear said:

Grigsby said:

Rushinbear said:

Grigsby said:

Rushinbear said:

71Bear said:

Rushinbear said:

LunchTime said:

Rushinbear said:

LunchTime said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence.




Cmon man. That's been debunked for awhile
I linked the image of the CDC form, with footnotes about a week ago. The 37,000 number has been made public much more recently. "Awhile" hasn't had time to transpire.
Ok first off, you do understand that your 37k stat is not accurate, correct?

second, things move fast in covid world. while you are spouting 37k deaths, the CDC is now projecting that by June, we could see 3000 deaths PER DAY
There is no accurate.

The CDC must be taken with a grain of salt, especially "projecting" and "we could see."
Sigh. Now you're making a whole different argument, which is fine I suppose.

Heres what you originally wrote: "No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence."

You were making the argument that the CDC was more or less incompetent because their so called "admission" that their original number of deaths was inaccurate. We now know the reason for the discrepancy (something you have yet to admit).

Now that you've been called out, you're now making a completely DIFFERENT argument that no numbers are accurate. Which is fine. I'm not going to argue with you there. But again, that's a completely different argument than you were making before.
what is the reason for the inaccuracy?
Just to be 100% clear:

37k is the death certificates gathered by the CDC. 60k is the notifications of death from individual health departments. Certificates lag behind by 1 to 8 weeks.

It's in the footnotes of what you cite.

There is no debate. They didnt "admit" two different numbers. They admit they are tracking deaths two ways.

It's the difference between counting a murder when the body is found with bullet holes in it, and when the corner signs the certificate. It's the difference between counting the corpses in a northern California town as you pick them up, and counting them 8 weeks later when the autopsy is done.

If you understand company's reporting, 60k is income, 37k is cash. A balance sheet, income, and cash flow all work together to build a picture. They are not conflicting views of the same information. They are the same information from different views.

37k and 60k are NOT conflicting numbers. Dont base so much emphasis on something that has literally no meaning.
How come CDC was reporting 60K last week? And, the footnotes in the CDC form I posted say that presumed deaths should be included. Plus, your timeline for autopsy reporting doesn't make sense.

I get the analogy to a company's financial reporting. The difference is that the earnings numbers come in shortly after the revenue. Here, you're purporting an 8 week lag. Is the govt that inefficient? (Oh, wait, did I just ask that?).
OK,

Above ALL, the CDC is still reporting 67,463 deaths (at 5/5/2020 10:15 pacific). They did NOT change their reporting. The added an additional resource. I believe that was a mistake, because a large percentage of the population is not educated enough to understand that there can be two methods to counting the same thing, at the same time.

Lets break this down potatohead style:

1. The CDC released a report showing 37k (now 39k) deaths. Everyone went wild about reporting adjustments to official numbers.

Here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

This number is the corner reported deaths.

It literally (as in literally) disclaims:
Quote:

NOTE: Number of deaths reported in this table are the total number of deaths received and coded as of the date of analysis and do not represent all deaths that occurred in that period.
and
Quote:

*Data during this period are incomplete because of the lag in time between when the death occurred and when the death certificate is completed, submitted to NCHS and processed for reporting purposes. This delay can range from 1 week to 8 weeks or more, depending on the jurisdiction, age, and cause of death.
emphasis mine

Presumed deaths are only counted if the corner reported COVID-19 as the cause of death (apparently ICD10 code U07.1). Presumed but not certificated deaths are not included.

2. The CDC also, still, has a report showing medical reported deaths. This is more timely.

here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html

This data is provided by the 55 Health Departments in the country, using a known case and death (through testing) and probable through meeting clinical criteria AND epidemiologic evidence.

This also has a disclaimer:
Quote:

In the event of a discrepancy between CDC cases and cases reported by state and local public health officials, data reported by states should be considered the most up to date.
This is the presumptive case count. The CDC gets the numbers reported from the 55 regional health systems, and aggregates them. As with my financial reporting analogy, there may be *some* bad debt that needs to be cleared, but it is more likely that they will revise revenue up as additional deferred revenue is paid.



As for the "Is the govt that inefficient?"
First; The government (CDC) is not that inefficient. It takes time to have a corner look at the people and confirm cause of death. Across 55 jurisdictions, the processes and timelines can be desperate. As Americans we demand this kind of decentralized government authority. But, the CDC still gives a centralized view of the totality: they dont make the data, they just collect and report the data, in this case.

Second; You think 1-8 weeks is a long time? Aapl takes about 5 weeks to report earnings. FedEx takes almost 13 weeks. My company takes about 8 weeks. VERY few companies turn around their data in less than 4 weeks.





FWIW, I agree with some of your points. Specifically that it is looking like a Swedish model may be a better model than our measures, and probably better than China's measures. I think the lockdown did not fundamentally impact mortality more significantly that less strict measures would have, but I have the luxury of not having to make that call, AND having an additional month and a half of data. Things are NOT better now (in California) than they were on March 22. They are MUCH worse (orders of magnitude more infected walking around, so more vectors for infection now), and we are relaxing measures. That tells me that my little opinion is shared by even the most careful people.

That doesnt change that your opener (37k vs 60k count adjustment) is just wrong in its assumption that they changed the numbers. They gave a new metric. TBH, you should absolutely drop the argument, because it is based on a misinterpretation of whatever you read. It also derails the point you are trying to make, by bringing in factually inaccurate arguments.

How many posts have you made espousing the core of your argument? Zero.
How many posts have you made arguing over a misinterpreted data point? 6. So far.
It's not which numbers are correct, but the discrepancy and its magnitude that erodes confidence.

Confidence is further eroded when we saw political leaders (including Trump) minimizing the infection in the early weeks and encouraging people to go about their lives as if nothing was happening. This was particularly true of Gov. Cuomo and his Director of Public Health pooh-poohing the danger and arguing that people had nothing to worry about. Pelosi's encouragement of attendance at the Chinese New Year (I think it was) celebration in SF didn't help her and her Party, either. And, if you have been paying attention, it can't have skipped your attention that both Fauci and Birx had been recorded supporting the Left/Dem perspective before the infection was uncovered. Granted, Fauci warned that Trump's first term would face an epidemic, but that was in the context of the history of every modern president having faced one. Still, he said it.

The data issue is further clouded by the presentation of Gov DeSantis of Florida when he announced the initial opening of the state last week. He presented figures which showed that the actual numbers on cases and deaths are 1/10 of what they were predicted to be and FL was not a lock-down state. It's stuff like that which makes the people wonder what they're bankrupting themselves personally for.

My biggest complaint is against those who deny that this thing came on fast, that President Trump took the first actions (CDC) before the first death in the US, that big states had foreclosed their readiness in favor of spending on pet social projects (even President Trump seems to have cleaned house in the epidemiological advisory group, although I took that as exercising his prerogative to put his own people in vs Obama's and I haven't followed whether he completed the transition there), that key leaders criticize him even while distracting him with impeachment and then stood in the way of action, and that there was no understanding in common about what we were facing.

Your presentation is persuasive on the merits of science and health practices, but it seems to ignore the social/political/economic context which infect them. I think everyone's doing a good job, except those who seem not to want a good job to be done.

As to financial reports, I was an implementation project manager for a financial management software company with over 1,000 clients. We had an interactive database across as many as 18 functions which gave real time calculations on big organizations (billion $ budgets). I could give you ye revenue and net figures in seconds and final reports in a day. It would take the finance team another couple days to meet and seal them. I suspect that the CDC and other databases are years out of date and slow, but that's no excuse.
The way to address a pandemic is by being proactive rather than reactive. Unless you are fully prepared to take immediate action (i.e., have all necessary supplies, including testing materials, ready to be disseminated across a wide geographic expanse, have all necessary plans to distribute and utilize those supplies in place, etc. etc.), once it manifests itself, it is too late. IMO, that Is where the incumbent President dropped the ball and the American public, in particular small business, is paying the price.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177


[url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177][/url]

Too late taking action?

Dec. 31 - China announced their CV19 investigation.
Jan. 7 - CDC established their incident management system.
Jan. 17 - CDC sends 100+ staff to screen all incoming Wuhan travelers at key airports.
Jan. 21 - CDC activated the emergency operations center.
Jan. 29 - President Trump established the Presidential CV19 Task Force.
Jan. 30 - President Trump declares travel ban to China.
Jan. 31 - WHO declared the virus an international contagion.
Jan. 31 - President Trump suspended entry into the US from China.
Jan. 31 - President Trump declared the Public Health Emergency.
Feb. 1 - President Trump bans all flights from China
etc.
etc.
Feb 29 - FIRST DEATH IN THE US FROM CV 19.

Each state was responsible to prepare itself and establish stores of equipment and supplies to confront a health emergency. Some did. That's never been the US govt.'s job - states rights and national govt must prepare for action with national admin/military re an epidemic. President Trump has repeatedly reported that the Obama administration left the cupboard bare. That has never been responsibly contradicted.

Meanwhile, the House Democrats were preoccupied with impeachment and did nothing.

Then, when impeachment failed, they repeatedly stalled President Trumps' efforts to take financial action. Having no further pretexts for undermining President Trump, this virus came as manna from Heaven for them.


Yikes, it is shocking how idiotic people are and how the education system in the US is woefully inadequate. It makes me wonder if Cal needs a better screening process, because your ability to think critically is non-existent.

You do realize that your timeline is like telling a story and removing all the parts that don't fit with your agenda.

Ahh yes the famous Trump travel ban from China, which might be the greatest sham ever, because it's not like someone from China couldn't just fly from China to the EU//UK and then the US.

Oh wait they could do just that .....

Frankly, you should be embarrassed at your complete and utter lack of reasoning.


Piss poor attempt at avoiding a direct response by distracting from it. I take it then that you don't dispute President Trump's having done those things. The accusation was that he was too late in taking action. I presented evidence that he took action before even the first death in the US.

No one's perfect (except you?), but he's done a lot in the face of conflicting opinions and evidence, a distracting impeachment effort by the Democrats that went nowhere and charges that some of the top scientists show signs of straddling the fence.

What we did was to buy time to get testing, treatments and vaccine research underway before we restarted the economy. Some will find fault if there is even one death, including acceptance of evidence that deaths caused by other means could be presumed to have been caused by 19 instead.

This is a mess that we're clawing our way out of, but it doesn't help to throw dust in the air and attack with name-calling. Luckily for the USA, the opinions of you and others who think as you do are being discarded in favor of common sense. I'm still protecting myself and those around me and I hope you do, too.


Trump has done jack ***** I simply suggested that your timeline was full of **** and I am not going waste time disputing each of the lies half truths that Trump has propagated because it would take years to unravel all of that *****


Not to mention the purported claims of action are horse*****
What is the point of calling an emergency and then completely downplaying the severity, or then refusing to prepare until **** already had hit the fan.

Why declare a state of emergency then claim a month later that there are 15 cases and that they will go to none.

This isn't about perfection. It's about responsibility and doing one's job. Not protecting one's self interest and exposing millions to disease, poverty and famine to protect the crony capitalistic agenda of 1%.

Again I will call bull**** on your claims. What did impeachment have to do when Trump was out gallivanting on the golf course and going to his rallies throughout February and March doing sweet **** all. Oh unless you count putting his grifter son in law in charge of a task force , which he has no business running, and committing acts of piracy against US states.

Oh, for the record I'm not a fan if the Democrats either. The whole system is a sham and completely undermines the responsibility to protect the citizenry.

It is completely how to be def many of Americans are to how the rest of the world views this country. But let me guess we're #1 why should we care what the rest of world thinks, right?



I am from Western Europe. My family lives there and the press there definitely don't show an unbiased approach towards the USA. Policies they laugh at Trump does to reallocate money they do themselves. Also Holland does basically what the US does. However, politics are out of their Covid management. Holland is also 1/10 the size of California and has 45% of the population. Elementary schools are going to be opened. They have worse statistics than the USA. Germany is doing great and soccer competition is going to resume next week. By the way California has better statistics than Germany..Gavin needs to tell those counties in Nor Cal to go the phase 3 and he better keep Tesla. He needs money to pay for all those programs we are funding.
You can not compare countries with homogenous populations to a country with a significantly diverse population. Nor can you compare countries with highly developed healthcare infrastructures to a country with a hodgepodge healthcare system.

By the way, Germany is doing well because of thoughtful, intelligent leadership. If the US were led by Merkel, we would not be in the mess in which we find ourselves. There is a huge difference between a highly educated woman and a mentally unstable hotel operator.
Goobear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
71Bear said:

Goobear said:

Grigsby said:

Rushinbear said:

Grigsby said:

Rushinbear said:

71Bear said:

Rushinbear said:

LunchTime said:

Rushinbear said:

LunchTime said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

ducky23 said:

Rushinbear said:

No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence.




Cmon man. That's been debunked for awhile
I linked the image of the CDC form, with footnotes about a week ago. The 37,000 number has been made public much more recently. "Awhile" hasn't had time to transpire.
Ok first off, you do understand that your 37k stat is not accurate, correct?

second, things move fast in covid world. while you are spouting 37k deaths, the CDC is now projecting that by June, we could see 3000 deaths PER DAY
There is no accurate.

The CDC must be taken with a grain of salt, especially "projecting" and "we could see."
Sigh. Now you're making a whole different argument, which is fine I suppose.

Heres what you originally wrote: "No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence."

You were making the argument that the CDC was more or less incompetent because their so called "admission" that their original number of deaths was inaccurate. We now know the reason for the discrepancy (something you have yet to admit).

Now that you've been called out, you're now making a completely DIFFERENT argument that no numbers are accurate. Which is fine. I'm not going to argue with you there. But again, that's a completely different argument than you were making before.
what is the reason for the inaccuracy?
Just to be 100% clear:

37k is the death certificates gathered by the CDC. 60k is the notifications of death from individual health departments. Certificates lag behind by 1 to 8 weeks.

It's in the footnotes of what you cite.

There is no debate. They didnt "admit" two different numbers. They admit they are tracking deaths two ways.

It's the difference between counting a murder when the body is found with bullet holes in it, and when the corner signs the certificate. It's the difference between counting the corpses in a northern California town as you pick them up, and counting them 8 weeks later when the autopsy is done.

If you understand company's reporting, 60k is income, 37k is cash. A balance sheet, income, and cash flow all work together to build a picture. They are not conflicting views of the same information. They are the same information from different views.

37k and 60k are NOT conflicting numbers. Dont base so much emphasis on something that has literally no meaning.
How come CDC was reporting 60K last week? And, the footnotes in the CDC form I posted say that presumed deaths should be included. Plus, your timeline for autopsy reporting doesn't make sense.

I get the analogy to a company's financial reporting. The difference is that the earnings numbers come in shortly after the revenue. Here, you're purporting an 8 week lag. Is the govt that inefficient? (Oh, wait, did I just ask that?).
OK,

Above ALL, the CDC is still reporting 67,463 deaths (at 5/5/2020 10:15 pacific). They did NOT change their reporting. The added an additional resource. I believe that was a mistake, because a large percentage of the population is not educated enough to understand that there can be two methods to counting the same thing, at the same time.

Lets break this down potatohead style:

1. The CDC released a report showing 37k (now 39k) deaths. Everyone went wild about reporting adjustments to official numbers.

Here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

This number is the corner reported deaths.

It literally (as in literally) disclaims:
Quote:

NOTE: Number of deaths reported in this table are the total number of deaths received and coded as of the date of analysis and do not represent all deaths that occurred in that period.
and
Quote:

*Data during this period are incomplete because of the lag in time between when the death occurred and when the death certificate is completed, submitted to NCHS and processed for reporting purposes. This delay can range from 1 week to 8 weeks or more, depending on the jurisdiction, age, and cause of death.
emphasis mine

Presumed deaths are only counted if the corner reported COVID-19 as the cause of death (apparently ICD10 code U07.1). Presumed but not certificated deaths are not included.

2. The CDC also, still, has a report showing medical reported deaths. This is more timely.

here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html

This data is provided by the 55 Health Departments in the country, using a known case and death (through testing) and probable through meeting clinical criteria AND epidemiologic evidence.

This also has a disclaimer:
Quote:

In the event of a discrepancy between CDC cases and cases reported by state and local public health officials, data reported by states should be considered the most up to date.
This is the presumptive case count. The CDC gets the numbers reported from the 55 regional health systems, and aggregates them. As with my financial reporting analogy, there may be *some* bad debt that needs to be cleared, but it is more likely that they will revise revenue up as additional deferred revenue is paid.



As for the "Is the govt that inefficient?"
First; The government (CDC) is not that inefficient. It takes time to have a corner look at the people and confirm cause of death. Across 55 jurisdictions, the processes and timelines can be desperate. As Americans we demand this kind of decentralized government authority. But, the CDC still gives a centralized view of the totality: they dont make the data, they just collect and report the data, in this case.

Second; You think 1-8 weeks is a long time? Aapl takes about 5 weeks to report earnings. FedEx takes almost 13 weeks. My company takes about 8 weeks. VERY few companies turn around their data in less than 4 weeks.





FWIW, I agree with some of your points. Specifically that it is looking like a Swedish model may be a better model than our measures, and probably better than China's measures. I think the lockdown did not fundamentally impact mortality more significantly that less strict measures would have, but I have the luxury of not having to make that call, AND having an additional month and a half of data. Things are NOT better now (in California) than they were on March 22. They are MUCH worse (orders of magnitude more infected walking around, so more vectors for infection now), and we are relaxing measures. That tells me that my little opinion is shared by even the most careful people.

That doesnt change that your opener (37k vs 60k count adjustment) is just wrong in its assumption that they changed the numbers. They gave a new metric. TBH, you should absolutely drop the argument, because it is based on a misinterpretation of whatever you read. It also derails the point you are trying to make, by bringing in factually inaccurate arguments.

How many posts have you made espousing the core of your argument? Zero.
How many posts have you made arguing over a misinterpreted data point? 6. So far.
It's not which numbers are correct, but the discrepancy and its magnitude that erodes confidence.

Confidence is further eroded when we saw political leaders (including Trump) minimizing the infection in the early weeks and encouraging people to go about their lives as if nothing was happening. This was particularly true of Gov. Cuomo and his Director of Public Health pooh-poohing the danger and arguing that people had nothing to worry about. Pelosi's encouragement of attendance at the Chinese New Year (I think it was) celebration in SF didn't help her and her Party, either. And, if you have been paying attention, it can't have skipped your attention that both Fauci and Birx had been recorded supporting the Left/Dem perspective before the infection was uncovered. Granted, Fauci warned that Trump's first term would face an epidemic, but that was in the context of the history of every modern president having faced one. Still, he said it.

The data issue is further clouded by the presentation of Gov DeSantis of Florida when he announced the initial opening of the state last week. He presented figures which showed that the actual numbers on cases and deaths are 1/10 of what they were predicted to be and FL was not a lock-down state. It's stuff like that which makes the people wonder what they're bankrupting themselves personally for.

My biggest complaint is against those who deny that this thing came on fast, that President Trump took the first actions (CDC) before the first death in the US, that big states had foreclosed their readiness in favor of spending on pet social projects (even President Trump seems to have cleaned house in the epidemiological advisory group, although I took that as exercising his prerogative to put his own people in vs Obama's and I haven't followed whether he completed the transition there), that key leaders criticize him even while distracting him with impeachment and then stood in the way of action, and that there was no understanding in common about what we were facing.

Your presentation is persuasive on the merits of science and health practices, but it seems to ignore the social/political/economic context which infect them. I think everyone's doing a good job, except those who seem not to want a good job to be done.

As to financial reports, I was an implementation project manager for a financial management software company with over 1,000 clients. We had an interactive database across as many as 18 functions which gave real time calculations on big organizations (billion $ budgets). I could give you ye revenue and net figures in seconds and final reports in a day. It would take the finance team another couple days to meet and seal them. I suspect that the CDC and other databases are years out of date and slow, but that's no excuse.
The way to address a pandemic is by being proactive rather than reactive. Unless you are fully prepared to take immediate action (i.e., have all necessary supplies, including testing materials, ready to be disseminated across a wide geographic expanse, have all necessary plans to distribute and utilize those supplies in place, etc. etc.), once it manifests itself, it is too late. IMO, that Is where the incumbent President dropped the ball and the American public, in particular small business, is paying the price.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177


[url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177][/url]

Too late taking action?

Dec. 31 - China announced their CV19 investigation.
Jan. 7 - CDC established their incident management system.
Jan. 17 - CDC sends 100+ staff to screen all incoming Wuhan travelers at key airports.
Jan. 21 - CDC activated the emergency operations center.
Jan. 29 - President Trump established the Presidential CV19 Task Force.
Jan. 30 - President Trump declares travel ban to China.
Jan. 31 - WHO declared the virus an international contagion.
Jan. 31 - President Trump suspended entry into the US from China.
Jan. 31 - President Trump declared the Public Health Emergency.
Feb. 1 - President Trump bans all flights from China
etc.
etc.
Feb 29 - FIRST DEATH IN THE US FROM CV 19.

Each state was responsible to prepare itself and establish stores of equipment and supplies to confront a health emergency. Some did. That's never been the US govt.'s job - states rights and national govt must prepare for action with national admin/military re an epidemic. President Trump has repeatedly reported that the Obama administration left the cupboard bare. That has never been responsibly contradicted.

Meanwhile, the House Democrats were preoccupied with impeachment and did nothing.

Then, when impeachment failed, they repeatedly stalled President Trumps' efforts to take financial action. Having no further pretexts for undermining President Trump, this virus came as manna from Heaven for them.


Yikes, it is shocking how idiotic people are and how the education system in the US is woefully inadequate. It makes me wonder if Cal needs a better screening process, because your ability to think critically is non-existent.

You do realize that your timeline is like telling a story and removing all the parts that don't fit with your agenda.

Ahh yes the famous Trump travel ban from China, which might be the greatest sham ever, because it's not like someone from China couldn't just fly from China to the EU//UK and then the US.

Oh wait they could do just that .....

Frankly, you should be embarrassed at your complete and utter lack of reasoning.


Piss poor attempt at avoiding a direct response by distracting from it. I take it then that you don't dispute President Trump's having done those things. The accusation was that he was too late in taking action. I presented evidence that he took action before even the first death in the US.

No one's perfect (except you?), but he's done a lot in the face of conflicting opinions and evidence, a distracting impeachment effort by the Democrats that went nowhere and charges that some of the top scientists show signs of straddling the fence.

What we did was to buy time to get testing, treatments and vaccine research underway before we restarted the economy. Some will find fault if there is even one death, including acceptance of evidence that deaths caused by other means could be presumed to have been caused by 19 instead.

This is a mess that we're clawing our way out of, but it doesn't help to throw dust in the air and attack with name-calling. Luckily for the USA, the opinions of you and others who think as you do are being discarded in favor of common sense. I'm still protecting myself and those around me and I hope you do, too.


Trump has done jack ***** I simply suggested that your timeline was full of **** and I am not going waste time disputing each of the lies half truths that Trump has propagated because it would take years to unravel all of that *****


Not to mention the purported claims of action are horse*****
What is the point of calling an emergency and then completely downplaying the severity, or then refusing to prepare until **** already had hit the fan.

Why declare a state of emergency then claim a month later that there are 15 cases and that they will go to none.

This isn't about perfection. It's about responsibility and doing one's job. Not protecting one's self interest and exposing millions to disease, poverty and famine to protect the crony capitalistic agenda of 1%.

Again I will call bull**** on your claims. What did impeachment have to do when Trump was out gallivanting on the golf course and going to his rallies throughout February and March doing sweet **** all. Oh unless you count putting his grifter son in law in charge of a task force , which he has no business running, and committing acts of piracy against US states.

Oh, for the record I'm not a fan if the Democrats either. The whole system is a sham and completely undermines the responsibility to protect the citizenry.

It is completely how to be def many of Americans are to how the rest of the world views this country. But let me guess we're #1 why should we care what the rest of world thinks, right?



I am from Western Europe. My family lives there and the press there definitely don't show an unbiased approach towards the USA. Policies they laugh at Trump does to reallocate money they do themselves. Also Holland does basically what the US does. However, politics are out of their Covid management. Holland is also 1/10 the size of California and has 45% of the population. Elementary schools are going to be opened. They have worse statistics than the USA. Germany is doing great and soccer competition is going to resume next week. By the way California has better statistics than Germany..Gavin needs to tell those counties in Nor Cal to go the phase 3 and he better keep Tesla. He needs money to pay for all those programs we are funding.
You can not compare countries with homogenous populations to a country with a significantly diverse population. Nor can you compare countries with highly developed healthcare infrastructures to a country with a hodgepodge healthcare system.

By the way, Germany is doing well because of thoughtful, intelligent leadership. If the US were led by Merkel, we would not be in the mess in which we find ourselves. There is a huge difference between a highly educated woman and a mentally unstable hotel operator.
I guess I wasn't clear enough, California better than Germany. I was comparing Holland vs USA. Stats of a homogenous population (which is not the case as much anymore) worse than USA.
philbert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Getting back to the original topic, this tweet thread by MLB pitcher Sean Doolittle raises a lot of the questions that I think would likely have to be answered.


Creeping Incrementalism
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cave Bear said:

Creeping Incrementalism said:

Quote:


It is actions that help slow the spread and can eliminate it. Trying to achieve "herd immunity" without a vaccine is crazy.

Another fact to consider is that based on the data from US Navy ships I have seen, of healthy mostly younger working age people, around 1 in 1000 infected men will die from this. So that is any one person's individual odds when they ask themselves if they are willing to risk this. And multiply that out for the total number of deaths.
Care to share this data? The official DOD numbers for active military personnel say just 2 deaths so far from 5171 cases. And of course as with all Covid case totals, the number of actual cases is likely to be significantly higher than the confirmed case count.

https://www.airforcemag.com/snapshot-dod-and-covid-19/

I can't find the stat now. Basically 800 on the Roosevelt + 300 on the Kidd infected, with one death. Your stats are about 1 in 2500, vs 1 in 1000 my stats, same ballpark in my opinion. If Pac-12 football is played and most players get infected, I think the math comes to a likelihood of 0-2 players dead.

This disease cannot be kept out of prisons so there is no way to keep it out of football. Best hope for a vaccine is 18 months and that is iffy. So probably 2+ seasons of no football.

That is the reality of the situation. 2+ seasons of no football, or accept about one death per conference per season.
ColoradoBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Creeping Incrementalism said:

Cave Bear said:

Creeping Incrementalism said:

Quote:


It is actions that help slow the spread and can eliminate it. Trying to achieve "herd immunity" without a vaccine is crazy.

Another fact to consider is that based on the data from US Navy ships I have seen, of healthy mostly younger working age people, around 1 in 1000 infected men will die from this. So that is any one person's individual odds when they ask themselves if they are willing to risk this. And multiply that out for the total number of deaths.
Care to share this data? The official DOD numbers for active military personnel say just 2 deaths so far from 5171 cases. And of course as with all Covid case totals, the number of actual cases is likely to be significantly higher than the confirmed case count.

https://www.airforcemag.com/snapshot-dod-and-covid-19/

I can't find the stat now. Basically 800 on the Roosevelt + 300 on the Kidd infected, with one death. Your stats are about 1 in 2500, vs 1 in 1000 my stats, same ballpark in my opinion. If Pac-12 football is played and most players get infected, I think the math comes to a likelihood of 0-2 players dead.

This disease cannot be kept out of prisons so there is no way to keep it out of football. Best hope for a vaccine is 18 months and that is iffy. So probably 2+ seasons of no football.

That is the reality of the situation. 2+ seasons of no football, or accept about one death per conference per season.



That's way, way, way too high of an estimate for deaths due to playing college football.

Right now the CDC has 42 deaths listed for 15-24 year olds (through May 2). Out of a total of 38000 confirmed US deaths. That's 1 in 904.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm

The NY antibody study from a few weeks ago suggested a death rate of 0.6-0.8% of those infected. Call that .7% or 1 in 142. That's all ages, so if the CDC age breakdown holds across the entire country, that's a 1 in 128000 chance of death for those in the 15-24 age range. Total number of fbs players is what, 10k? So that would be one death across FBS every 13 years. And that's assuming every player actually contracts Covid while playing football.


ColoradoBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Creeping Incrementalism said:

Cave Bear said:

Creeping Incrementalism said:

Quote:


It is actions that help slow the spread and can eliminate it. Trying to achieve "herd immunity" without a vaccine is crazy.

Another fact to consider is that based on the data from US Navy ships I have seen, of healthy mostly younger working age people, around 1 in 1000 infected men will die from this. So that is any one person's individual odds when they ask themselves if they are willing to risk this. And multiply that out for the total number of deaths.
Care to share this data? The official DOD numbers for active military personnel say just 2 deaths so far from 5171 cases. And of course as with all Covid case totals, the number of actual cases is likely to be significantly higher than the confirmed case count.

https://www.airforcemag.com/snapshot-dod-and-covid-19/

I can't find the stat now. Basically 800 on the Roosevelt + 300 on the Kidd infected, with one death. Your stats are about 1 in 2500, vs 1 in 1000 my stats, same ballpark in my opinion. If Pac-12 football is played and most players get infected, I think the math comes to a likelihood of 0-2 players dead.

This disease cannot be kept out of prisons so there is no way to keep it out of football. Best hope for a vaccine is 18 months and that is iffy. So probably 2+ seasons of no football.

That is the reality of the situation. 2+ seasons of no football, or accept about one death per conference per season.

This analysis is wrong in a couple ways. First, while it is true that if one player gets the virus there will be some spread, it won't be to everyone. Players will be tested and adopt behaviors to reduce spread in the chance they are infected. Everyone is looking for the virus. The situation is much different than spread through an unaware ship who are living together 24/7. When the virus hit the NBA it impacted a few players here and there but only a small percentage. And even that was before awareness.

Second, the medical care on land now is going to be much better than on a ship a couple months ago. Last I heard UCSF hospital had only 1 death total and Stanford hospital only 2. These numbers may have gotten slightly worse but not much. The whole city of Berkeley only has 1 death. And care is improving every day thus reducing risk. College programs can give their players the best possible care and help protect them in that way.

Added up, the risk is not 0 but very, very low. It is impossible to assign a number but much lower than assuming everyone is infected and medical care is like on a ship. By Fall 2021 I would be shocked if there are not more helpful treatments because there is already one drug, remdesivir, that is probably helpful and hundreds of others that are being tried. Drug treatments can be assessed quickly unlike vaccines.

Overall, I think risk is low enough in Fall 2020.

Sluggo
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
philbert said:

Getting back to the original topic, this tweet thread by MLB pitcher Sean Doolittle raises a lot of the questions that I think would likely have to be answered.



The German soccer league, the Bundesliga, has developed a comprehensive model for how to operate in this environment. All baseball has to do is copy it. I think he is right that playing puts older support personnel at risk, so perhaps it would be best if support personnel were restricted to younger people for the next year. I don't think anything like 20% of infected young, strong, healthy people like pro baseball players would have long terms consequences. I would think more like 1-2%. Numbers are difficult this early.

Test regularly, quarantine when tests come back positive, and get on with it. Players afraid stay home.

Sluggo
Rushinbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Creeping Incrementalism said:

Cave Bear said:

Creeping Incrementalism said:

Quote:


It is actions that help slow the spread and can eliminate it. Trying to achieve "herd immunity" without a vaccine is crazy.

Another fact to consider is that based on the data from US Navy ships I have seen, of healthy mostly younger working age people, around 1 in 1000 infected men will die from this. So that is any one person's individual odds when they ask themselves if they are willing to risk this. And multiply that out for the total number of deaths.
Care to share this data? The official DOD numbers for active military personnel say just 2 deaths so far from 5171 cases. And of course as with all Covid case totals, the number of actual cases is likely to be significantly higher than the confirmed case count.

https://www.airforcemag.com/snapshot-dod-and-covid-19/

I can't find the stat now. Basically 800 on the Roosevelt + 300 on the Kidd infected, with one death. Your stats are about 1 in 2500, vs 1 in 1000 my stats, same ballpark in my opinion. If Pac-12 football is played and most players get infected, I think the math comes to a likelihood of 0-2 players dead.

This disease cannot be kept out of prisons so there is no way to keep it out of football. Best hope for a vaccine is 18 months and that is iffy. So probably 2+ seasons of no football.

That is the reality of the situation. 2+ seasons of no football, or accept about one death per conference per season.

There will be football this year with actions taken to minimize risk. When we have it, we trust that you will be back to admit your underlying intent.

If there any infections, or God forbid, deaths, we trust that you will be back to demonstrate that they will have been as a direct result of the virus and not some presumption.

In the meantime, we trust that you will quarantine yourself in your home, literally and figuratively.
Cave Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Creeping Incrementalism said:

Cave Bear said:

Creeping Incrementalism said:

Quote:


It is actions that help slow the spread and can eliminate it. Trying to achieve "herd immunity" without a vaccine is crazy.

Another fact to consider is that based on the data from US Navy ships I have seen, of healthy mostly younger working age people, around 1 in 1000 infected men will die from this. So that is any one person's individual odds when they ask themselves if they are willing to risk this. And multiply that out for the total number of deaths.
Care to share this data? The official DOD numbers for active military personnel say just 2 deaths so far from 5171 cases. And of course as with all Covid case totals, the number of actual cases is likely to be significantly higher than the confirmed case count.

https://www.airforcemag.com/snapshot-dod-and-covid-19/

I can't find the stat now. Basically 800 on the Roosevelt + 300 on the Kidd infected, with one death. Your stats are about 1 in 2500, vs 1 in 1000 my stats, same ballpark in my opinion. If Pac-12 football is played and most players get infected, I think the math comes to a likelihood of 0-2 players dead.

This disease cannot be kept out of prisons so there is no way to keep it out of football. Best hope for a vaccine is 18 months and that is iffy. So probably 2+ seasons of no football.

That is the reality of the situation. 2+ seasons of no football, or accept about one death per conference per season.

That's not the reality of the situation.

(1) The 1/2500 is using the Case Fatality Rate, the deaths out of the total confirmed cases. The number of actual military cases is bound to be higher, just like the general population. How much higher the actual number of infections are than the confirmed infections can't be known, but it will significantly reduce the number from 1/2500.

(2) The approx 1,000 confirmed cases from the Roosevelt is from a crew of 4,800. After several weeks of spreading inside a confined area, only 1 in 5 sailors had become infected. Your calculation of the number of Pac-12 football deaths assumes all of the ~1,200 players becomes infected. In reality, the infection rate for the players should be far lower than 1 in 5 given that when the players are not actively playing or practicing they can utilize the same mitigation measures we all use with masks and distancing.

(3) While the average active duty military person will be more fit than the general populace, they will not be as fit as the average Pac-12 football player. The sailor who died was 41 and no information that I know of has been released as to whether he had any comorbidities.

I think the real risk to players is a small fraction of what you have assessed. So long as appropriate mitigation protocols are followed (players wear masks and social distance, and health checks are regularly made with symptomatic players being isolated), I doubt even one Pac-12 player stands to die from increased COVID risk in 2 seasons of football.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1. If we play this Fall, it is quite reasonable to assume there will be a few COVID outbreaks among players.

2. At some point over the season, it is possible that a player could, for whatever reason within his body, die from COVID.

For each of the above scenarios, there is going to be some degree of freak-out by the media and, in turn, the general public. It's just too irresistible a story for the media to not play up. The question is, how will that freak-out be dealt with and how much of it can be absorbed??
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

1. If we play this Fall, it is quite reasonable to assume there will be a few COVID outbreaks among players.

2. At some point over the season, it is possible that a player could, for whatever reason within his body, die from COVID.

For each of the above scenarios, there is going to be some degree of freak-out by the media and, in turn, the general public. It's just too irresistible a story for the media to not play up. The question is, how will that freak-out be dealt with and how much of it can be absorbed??
It will be the same for MLB. What will it do when the first player, coach, staff, beat writer, etc. gets Covid during the second spring training or the season? I have been watching KBO and the Taiwan league for any reports of Covid and what they are doing about it.
Cave Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

1. If we play this Fall, it is quite reasonable to assume there will be a few COVID outbreaks among players.

2. At some point over the season, it is possible that a player could, for whatever reason within his body, die from COVID.

For each of the above scenarios, there is going to be some degree of freak-out by the media and, in turn, the general public. It's just too irresistible a story for the media to not play up. The question is, how will that freak-out be dealt with and how much of it can be absorbed??
I agree with both #1 and #2. The exchange above refers only to the Pac-12; the number of total NCAA CFB players (all divs) is in the tens of thousands. Even a single death could trigger the kind of freak-out you alluded to, absurd as that is to me. I don't doubt that this kind of consideration will weigh heavily upon the decision makers, particularly in more blue regions. I don't have an answer for how that could be defended against.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.