Rushinbear said:
Grigsby said:
Rushinbear said:
71Bear said:
Rushinbear said:
LunchTime said:
Rushinbear said:
LunchTime said:
Rushinbear said:
ducky23 said:
Rushinbear said:
ducky23 said:
Rushinbear said:
ducky23 said:
Rushinbear said:
No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence.
Cmon man. That's been debunked for awhile
I linked the image of the CDC form, with footnotes about a week ago. The 37,000 number has been made public much more recently. "Awhile" hasn't had time to transpire.
Ok first off, you do understand that your 37k stat is not accurate, correct?
second, things move fast in covid world. while you are spouting 37k deaths, the CDC is now projecting that by June, we could see 3000 deaths PER DAY
There is no accurate.
The CDC must be taken with a grain of salt, especially "projecting" and "we could see."
Sigh. Now you're making a whole different argument, which is fine I suppose.
Heres what you originally wrote: "No football would be a huge mistake. We see how this situation is being managed, globally, nationally and on a state level. The recent admission by the CDC that the number of deaths is 37,000, not 60,000, is the latest evidence."
You were making the argument that the CDC was more or less incompetent because their so called "admission" that their original number of deaths was inaccurate. We now know the reason for the discrepancy (something you have yet to admit).
Now that you've been called out, you're now making a completely DIFFERENT argument that no numbers are accurate. Which is fine. I'm not going to argue with you there. But again, that's a completely different argument than you were making before.
what is the reason for the inaccuracy?
Just to be 100% clear:
37k is the death certificates gathered by the CDC. 60k is the notifications of death from individual health departments. Certificates lag behind by 1 to 8 weeks.
It's in the footnotes of what you cite.
There is no debate. They didnt "admit" two different numbers. They admit they are tracking deaths two ways.
It's the difference between counting a murder when the body is found with bullet holes in it, and when the corner signs the certificate. It's the difference between counting the corpses in a northern California town as you pick them up, and counting them 8 weeks later when the autopsy is done.
If you understand company's reporting, 60k is income, 37k is cash. A balance sheet, income, and cash flow all work together to build a picture. They are not conflicting views of the same information. They are the same information from different views.
37k and 60k are NOT conflicting numbers. Dont base so much emphasis on something that has literally no meaning.
How come CDC was reporting 60K last week? And, the footnotes in the CDC form I posted say that presumed deaths should be included. Plus, your timeline for autopsy reporting doesn't make sense.
I get the analogy to a company's financial reporting. The difference is that the earnings numbers come in shortly after the revenue. Here, you're purporting an 8 week lag. Is the govt that inefficient? (Oh, wait, did I just ask that?).
OK,
Above ALL, the CDC is still reporting 67,463 deaths (at 5/5/2020 10:15 pacific). They did NOT change their reporting. The added an additional resource. I believe that was a mistake, because a large percentage of the population is not educated enough to understand that there can be two methods to counting the same thing, at the same time.
Lets break this down potatohead style:
1. The CDC released a report showing 37k (now 39k) deaths. Everyone went wild about reporting adjustments to official numbers.
Here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm
This number is the corner reported deaths.
It literally (as in literally) disclaims:
Quote:
NOTE: Number of deaths reported in this table are the total number of deaths received and coded as of the date of analysis and do not represent all deaths that occurred in that period.
and
Quote:
*Data during this period are incomplete because of the lag in time between when the death occurred and when the death certificate is completed, submitted to NCHS and processed for reporting purposes. This delay can range from 1 week to 8 weeks or more, depending on the jurisdiction, age, and cause of death.
emphasis mine
Presumed deaths are only counted if the corner reported COVID-19 as the cause of death (apparently ICD10 code U07.1). Presumed but not certificated deaths are not included.
2. The CDC also, still, has a report showing medical reported deaths. This is more timely.
here is the link: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html
This data is provided by the 55 Health Departments in the country, using a known case and death (through testing) and probable through meeting clinical criteria AND epidemiologic evidence.
This also has a disclaimer:
Quote:
In the event of a discrepancy between CDC cases and cases reported by state and local public health officials, data reported by states should be considered the most up to date.
This is the presumptive case count. The CDC gets the numbers reported from the 55 regional health systems, and aggregates them. As with my financial reporting analogy, there may be *some* bad debt that needs to be cleared, but it is more likely that they will revise revenue up as additional deferred revenue is paid.
As for the "Is the govt that inefficient?"
First; The government (CDC) is not that inefficient. It takes time to have a corner look at the people and confirm cause of death. Across 55 jurisdictions, the processes and timelines can be desperate. As Americans we demand this kind of decentralized government authority. But, the CDC still gives a centralized view of the totality: they dont make the data, they just collect and report the data, in this case.
Second; You think 1-8 weeks is a long time? Aapl takes about 5 weeks to report earnings. FedEx takes almost 13 weeks. My company takes about 8 weeks. VERY few companies turn around their data in less than 4 weeks.
FWIW, I agree with some of your points. Specifically that it is looking like a Swedish model may be a better model than our measures, and probably better than China's measures. I think the lockdown did not fundamentally impact mortality more significantly that less strict measures would have, but I have the luxury of not having to make that call, AND having an additional month and a half of data. Things are NOT better now (in California) than they were on March 22. They are MUCH worse (orders of magnitude more infected walking around, so more vectors for infection now), and we are relaxing measures. That tells me that my little opinion is shared by even the most careful people.
That doesnt change that your opener (37k vs 60k count adjustment) is just wrong in its assumption that they changed the numbers. They gave a new metric. TBH, you should absolutely drop the argument, because it is based on a misinterpretation of whatever you read. It also derails the point you are trying to make, by bringing in factually inaccurate arguments.
How many posts have you made espousing the core of your argument? Zero.
How many posts have you made arguing over a misinterpreted data point? 6. So far.
It's not which numbers are correct, but the discrepancy and its magnitude that erodes confidence.
Confidence is further eroded when we saw political leaders (including Trump) minimizing the infection in the early weeks and encouraging people to go about their lives as if nothing was happening. This was particularly true of Gov. Cuomo and his Director of Public Health pooh-poohing the danger and arguing that people had nothing to worry about. Pelosi's encouragement of attendance at the Chinese New Year (I think it was) celebration in SF didn't help her and her Party, either. And, if you have been paying attention, it can't have skipped your attention that both Fauci and Birx had been recorded supporting the Left/Dem perspective before the infection was uncovered. Granted, Fauci warned that Trump's first term would face an epidemic, but that was in the context of the history of every modern president having faced one. Still, he said it.
The data issue is further clouded by the presentation of Gov DeSantis of Florida when he announced the initial opening of the state last week. He presented figures which showed that the actual numbers on cases and deaths are 1/10 of what they were predicted to be and FL was not a lock-down state. It's stuff like that which makes the people wonder what they're bankrupting themselves personally for.
My biggest complaint is against those who deny that this thing came on fast, that President Trump took the first actions (CDC) before the first death in the US, that big states had foreclosed their readiness in favor of spending on pet social projects (even President Trump seems to have cleaned house in the epidemiological advisory group, although I took that as exercising his prerogative to put his own people in vs Obama's and I haven't followed whether he completed the transition there), that key leaders criticize him even while distracting him with impeachment and then stood in the way of action, and that there was no understanding in common about what we were facing.
Your presentation is persuasive on the merits of science and health practices, but it seems to ignore the social/political/economic context which infect them. I think everyone's doing a good job, except those who seem not to want a good job to be done.
As to financial reports, I was an implementation project manager for a financial management software company with over 1,000 clients. We had an interactive database across as many as 18 functions which gave real time calculations on big organizations (billion $ budgets). I could give you ye revenue and net figures in seconds and final reports in a day. It would take the finance team another couple days to meet and seal them. I suspect that the CDC and other databases are years out of date and slow, but that's no excuse.
The way to address a pandemic is by being proactive rather than reactive. Unless you are fully prepared to take immediate action (i.e., have all necessary supplies, including testing materials, ready to be disseminated across a wide geographic expanse, have all necessary plans to distribute and utilize those supplies in place, etc. etc.), once it manifests itself, it is too late. IMO, that Is where the incumbent President dropped the ball and the American public, in particular small business, is paying the price.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177
[url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trump-disbanded-nsc-pandemic-unit-experts-praised-69594177][/url]
Too late taking action?
Dec. 31 - China announced their CV19 investigation.
Jan. 7 - CDC established their incident management system.
Jan. 17 - CDC sends 100+ staff to screen all incoming Wuhan travelers at key airports.
Jan. 21 - CDC activated the emergency operations center.
Jan. 29 - President Trump established the Presidential CV19 Task Force.
Jan. 30 - President Trump declares travel ban to China.
Jan. 31 - WHO declared the virus an international contagion.
Jan. 31 - President Trump suspended entry into the US from China.
Jan. 31 - President Trump declared the Public Health Emergency.
Feb. 1 - President Trump bans all flights from China
etc.
etc.
Feb 29 - FIRST DEATH IN THE US FROM CV 19.
Each state was responsible to prepare itself and establish stores of equipment and supplies to confront a health emergency. Some did. That's never been the US govt.'s job - states rights and national govt must prepare for action with national admin/military re an epidemic. President Trump has repeatedly reported that the Obama administration left the cupboard bare. That has never been responsibly contradicted.
Meanwhile, the House Democrats were preoccupied with impeachment and did nothing.
Then, when impeachment failed, they repeatedly stalled President Trumps' efforts to take financial action. Having no further pretexts for undermining President Trump, this virus came as manna from Heaven for them.
Yikes, it is shocking how idiotic people are and how the education system in the US is woefully inadequate. It makes me wonder if Cal needs a better screening process, because your ability to think critically is non-existent.
You do realize that your timeline is like telling a story and removing all the parts that don't fit with your agenda.
Ahh yes the famous Trump travel ban from China, which might be the greatest sham ever, because it's not like someone from China couldn't just fly from China to the EU//UK and then the US.
Oh wait they could do just that .....
Frankly, you should be embarrassed at your complete and utter lack of reasoning.
Piss poor attempt at avoiding a direct response by distracting from it. I take it then that you don't dispute President Trump's having done those things. The accusation was that he was too late in taking action. I presented evidence that he took action before even the first death in the US.
No one's perfect (except you?), but he's done a lot in the face of conflicting opinions and evidence, a distracting impeachment effort by the Democrats that went nowhere and charges that some of the top scientists show signs of straddling the fence.
What we did was to buy time to get testing, treatments and vaccine research underway before we restarted the economy. Some will find fault if there is even one death, including acceptance of evidence that deaths caused by other means could be presumed to have been caused by 19 instead.
This is a mess that we're clawing our way out of, but it doesn't help to throw dust in the air and attack with name-calling. Luckily for the USA, the opinions of you and others who think as you do are being discarded in favor of common sense. I'm still protecting myself and those around me and I hope you do, too.
Trump has done jack ***** I simply suggested that your timeline was full of **** and I am not going waste time disputing each of the lies half truths that Trump has propagated because it would take years to unravel all of that *****
Not to mention the purported claims of action are horse*****
What is the point of calling an emergency and then completely downplaying the severity, or then refusing to prepare until **** already had hit the fan.
Why declare a state of emergency then claim a month later that there are 15 cases and that they will go to none.
This isn't about perfection. It's about responsibility and doing one's job. Not protecting one's self interest and exposing millions to disease, poverty and famine to protect the crony capitalistic agenda of 1%.
Again I will call bull**** on your claims. What did impeachment have to do when Trump was out gallivanting on the golf course and going to his rallies throughout February and March doing sweet **** all. Oh unless you count putting his grifter son in law in charge of a task force , which he has no business running, and committing acts of piracy against US states.
Oh, for the record I'm not a fan if the Democrats either. The whole system is a sham and completely undermines the responsibility to protect the citizenry.
It is completely how to be def many of Americans are to how the rest of the world views this country. But let me guess we're #1 why should we care what the rest of world thinks, right?