okaydo said:

---

The Trump campaign has been notorious for violating copyright.

It's simple: Don't violate other people's copyright.

Trump's attitude this entire time is he can do what he wants. Well, sometimes you have to do the extra work when you can't get what you want.

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

honestly bearlyamazing you should educate yourself before making these ridiculous claims. I would suggest you look into the DMCA and what it requires Twitter to do in response to claims from copyright owners.

This is totally separate from Section 230 and unless Twitter complies with valid DMCA takedown notices, it would become liable for copyright violations.

---

An anonymous complaint is no legal threshold. If it were, all it would take to take down tons of video on twitter would be an anonymous complaint.

The dominant majority of video of any of the protests would have to come down.

This is just nonsense.

---

You have no idea what you are talking about.

If you can't explain to me why this wasn't a valid DMCA takedown request, why would anyone listen to you?

You constantly post fake news and have shown that you have no ability to differentiate fantasy from reality. Weeks ago you posted obviously fake news from citizen free press about death rates in NYC that would I (any many others) immediately identified as fake. This is another example that is as clear as day. You may never admit it because you aren't operating in good faith, but anyone who knows anything about the DMCA is reading your posts and shaking their heads.

---

More typical gaslighting

---

Is gaslighting the new word making the rounds in right wing media or something?

---

okaydo said:

---

The Trump campaign has been notorious for violating copyright.

It's simple: Don't violate other people's copyright.

Trump's attitude this entire time is he can do what he wants. Well, sometimes you have to do the extra work when you can't get what you want.

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Twitter taking Trump's video down addressing the Floyd case and the protests is inexcusable. Using the pathetic pretext of an anonymous copyright claim is a joke. They just don't want his message to reach a mass audience.

It's a very good video and it scares them that it might put him in a good light with regard to race relations.

It's certainly a lot better than the tone deaf tweet he sent about bullets flying when violent protests start.



https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/6/5/21281787/twitter-trump-george-floyd-campaign-video-copyright

---

Warning: This poster has a history of posting material sourced from an organization funded by the Russian government that has been forced by the Trump administration to register as a foreign agent.

---

calbear93 said:

---

OaktownBear said:

---

calbear93 said:

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

honestly bearlyamazing you should educate yourself before making these ridiculous claims. I would suggest you look into the DMCA and what it requires Twitter to do in response to claims from copyright owners.

This is totally separate from Section 230 and unless Twitter complies with valid DMCA takedown notices, it would become liable for copyright violations.

---

An anonymous complaint is no legal threshold. If it were, all it would take to take down tons of video on twitter would be an anonymous complaint.

The dominant majority of video of any of the protests would have to come down.

This is just nonsense.

---

You have no idea what you are talking about.

If you can't explain to me why this wasn't a valid DMCA takedown request, why would anyone listen to you?

You constantly post fake news and have shown that you have no ability to differentiate fantasy from reality. Weeks ago you posted obviously fake news from citizen free press about death rates in NYC that would I (any many others) immediately identified as fake. This is another example that is as clear as day. You may never admit it because you aren't operating in good faith, but anyone who knows anything about the DMCA is reading your posts and shaking their heads.

---

More typical gaslighting

---

Is gaslighting the new word making the rounds in right wing media or something?

---

No, in typical fashion, a few liberal posters who often engage in that practice, have been accusing us of doing so in the past. What is your problem is the term if it's accurate?

---

If you wish to gaslight us with accusations of gaslighting in threads where no one is gaslighting and then gaslight by responding to non-gaslighting by continuing to gaslighting and accusing others of gaslighting in response and then gaslight us about where you are getting the term gaslighting, you can feel free to go on gaslighting.

Something about virtue signaling. Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Gaslight

---

See, now you are being an ass. Without showing where we were wrong about accusation of gaslighting, you choose to be snide.

I will choose your word of choice. How many times have you used the word "empathy," going on some false compassion tour as if your delusions reflect some heightened sensibility?

You must be able to empathize with those who do not want to empathize with posters who gaslight and have no empathy but use the term empathy as if that makes them empathetic. If you have no empathy yourself for anyone while pretending to empathize but really are just mistaking as empathy your delusions of grandeur for no apparent reasons other than some random posters have starred your prior post in this all too important forum, then you really need to have empathy for others who show no patience for that type of stupidity and falsity.

But I empathize why you would like others to empathize with your attempt to show a veneer of empathy because quite frankly, what else do you have?

Oh, let's not forget that you desire to show empathy to the black community by letting the black community know that if all white people were like you, this would be a better world for them and that you understand why they loot despite the fact that looting was done by all races.

Oh and something about redneck, RWNJ, white privilege, and fascism.

And empathy.

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Twitter taking Trump's video down addressing the Floyd case and the protests is inexcusable. Using the pathetic pretext of an anonymous copyright claim is a joke. They just don't want his message to reach a mass audience.

It's a very good video and it scares them that it might put him in a good light with regard to race relations.

It's certainly a lot better than the tone deaf tweet he sent about bullets flying when violent protests start.



https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/6/5/21281787/twitter-trump-george-floyd-campaign-video-copyright

---

Warning: This poster has a history of posting material sourced from an organization funded by the Russian government that has been forced by the Trump administration to register as a foreign agent.

---

Anyone who's not a dimwitted stooge and has read even 10% of my posts will know that you, Unit2 and blungld's pathetic, pathological attempts to follow me around and try to discredit me with your gaslighting don't fool anyone with a brain. And yes, I'm using the word gaslighting today because you clowns hope if you continue to try and perpetuate the same lies over and over again, maybe people will start to believe you. Newsflash: No one with a brain will fall for it.

---

Because you asked for it, I'm going to continue dunking on you.

Although you are thoroughly unfamiliar with DMCA takedowns, I will tell you who isn't: Trump's campaign. If you click on the link (which you probably won't) and read it, you would see that it describes the Trump campaign accusing someone of violating their intellectual property rights and that the subject company immediately took down the content. That's how DMCA takedowns worst. You will also note that the person whose content was taken down challenged the company and had the challenge denied and then worked with an outside group to challenge it again and the company was convinced to host the content again. That same thing could happen here if Trump's campaign could rightfully make a claim that their use is permitted and not actually a copyright violation. They haven't made any such claim however. I suspect that the campaign will remove the infringing content and re-post the cleansed video.

I'm more than willing to have an argument on the merits here, but bearlyamazing is throughly uninterested in doing so because he isn't here to engage in a good faith discussion.

So if my posts in this thread have been a pathetic, pathological attempt to discredit you with gaslighting, it should be exceedingly easy for you to present substantive arguments in your favor. You have yet to do so. And, let's be honest, you won't do so because you have no idea what you are talking about.

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Twitter taking Trump's video down addressing the Floyd case and the protests is inexcusable. Using the pathetic pretext of an anonymous copyright claim is a joke. They just don't want his message to reach a mass audience.

It's a very good video and it scares them that it might put him in a good light with regard to race relations.

It's certainly a lot better than the tone deaf tweet he sent about bullets flying when violent protests start.



https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/6/5/21281787/twitter-trump-george-floyd-campaign-video-copyright

---

Warning: This poster has a history of posting material sourced from an organization funded by the Russian government that has been forced by the Trump administration to register as a foreign agent.

---

Warning: This poster has a history of trying to discredit posters with views he doesn't share with spurious accusations. RT wasn't the only poster of the video I posted of Biden's quid pro quo crime in a single post of probably 1,000 or so posts here.

Anyone who's not a dimwitted stooge and has read even 10% of my posts will know that you, Unit2 and blungld's pathetic, pathological attempts to follow me around and try to discredit me with your gaslighting don't fool anyone with a brain. And yes, I'm using the word gaslighting today because you clowns hope if you continue to try and perpetuate the same lies over and over again, maybe people will start to believe you. Newsflash: No one with a brain will fall for it.

It's hilarious how threatened you snowflake clowns are by me bursting your little lefty bubble of lies. I'm just one single person. Imagine if more of the conservative posters on the board had the tolerance level and thick skin to call you clowns out, too? You'd be ready for the rubber room.

---

Warning: This poster has a history of posting material sourced from an organization funded by the Russian government that has been forced by the Trump administration to register as a foreign agent.

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Twitter taking Trump's video down addressing the Floyd case and the protests is inexcusable. Using the pathetic pretext of an anonymous copyright claim is a joke. They just don't want his message to reach a mass audience.

It's a very good video and it scares them that it might put him in a good light with regard to race relations.

It's certainly a lot better than the tone deaf tweet he sent about bullets flying when violent protests start.



https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/6/5/21281787/twitter-trump-george-floyd-campaign-video-copyright

---

Warning: This poster has a history of posting material sourced from an organization funded by the Russian government that has been forced by the Trump administration to register as a foreign agent.

---

Warning: This poster has a history of trying to discredit posters with views he doesn't share with spurious accusations. RT wasn't the only poster of the video I posted of Biden's quid pro quo crime in a single post of probably 1,000 or so posts here.

Anyone who's not a dimwitted stooge and has read even 10% of my posts will know that you, Unit2 and blungld's pathetic, pathological attempts to follow me around and try to discredit me with your gaslighting don't fool anyone with a brain. And yes, I'm using the word gaslighting today because you clowns hope if you continue to try and perpetuate the same lies over and over again, maybe people will start to believe you. Newsflash: No one with a brain will fall for it.

It's hilarious how threatened you snowflake clowns are by me bursting your little lefty bubble of lies. I'm just one single person. Imagine if more of the conservative posters on the board had the tolerance level and thick skin to call you clowns out, too? You'd be ready for the rubber room.

---

Warning: This poster has a history of posting material sourced from an organization funded by the Russian government that has been forced by the Trump administration to register as a foreign agent.

---

Warning: This poster has a history of trying to discredit posters with views he doesn't share with spurious accusations. RT wasn't the only poster of the video I posted of Biden's quid pro quo crime in a single post of probably 1,000 or so posts here.

Anyone who's not a dimwitted stooge and has read even 10% of my posts will know that you, Unit2 and blungld's pathetic, pathological attempts to follow me around and try to discredit me with your gaslighting don't fool anyone with a brain. And yes, I'm using the word gaslighting today because you clowns hope if you continue to try and perpetuate the same lies over and over again, maybe people will start to believe you. Newsflash: No one with a brain will fall for it.

It's hilarious how threatened you snowflake clowns are by me bursting your little lefty bubble of lies. I'm just one single person. Imagine if more of the conservative posters on the board had the tolerance level and thick skin to call you clowns out, too? You'd be ready for the rubber room.

---

You literally posted Russian propaganda.

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Twitter taking Trump's video down addressing the Floyd case and the protests is inexcusable. Using the pathetic pretext of an anonymous copyright claim is a joke. They just don't want his message to reach a mass audience.

It's a very good video and it scares them that it might put him in a good light with regard to race relations.

It's certainly a lot better than the tone deaf tweet he sent about bullets flying when violent protests start.



https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/6/5/21281787/twitter-trump-george-floyd-campaign-video-copyright

---

Warning: This poster has a history of posting material sourced from an organization funded by the Russian government that has been forced by the Trump administration to register as a foreign agent.

---

Anyone who's not a dimwitted stooge and has read even 10% of my posts will know that you, Unit2 and blungld's pathetic, pathological attempts to follow me around and try to discredit me with your gaslighting don't fool anyone with a brain. And yes, I'm using the word gaslighting today because you clowns hope if you continue to try and perpetuate the same lies over and over again, maybe people will start to believe you. Newsflash: No one with a brain will fall for it.

---

Because you asked for it, I'm going to continue dunking on you.

Although you are thoroughly unfamiliar with DMCA takedowns, I will tell you who isn't: Trump's campaign. If you click on the link (which you probably won't) and read it, you would see that it describes the Trump campaign accusing someone of violating their intellectual property rights and that the subject company immediately took down the content. That's how DMCA takedowns worst. You will also note that the person whose content was taken down challenged the company and had the challenge denied and then worked with an outside group to challenge it again and the company was convinced to host the content again. That same thing could happen here if Trump's campaign could rightfully make a claim that their use is permitted and not actually a copyright violation. They haven't made any such claim however. I suspect that the campaign will remove the infringing content and re-post the cleansed video.

I'm more than willing to have an argument on the merits here, but bearlyamazing is throughly uninterested in doing so because he isn't here to engage in a good faith discussion.

So if my posts in this thread have been a pathetic, pathological attempt to discredit you with gaslighting, it should be exceedingly easy for you to present substantive arguments in your favor. You have yet to do so. And, let's be honest, you won't do so because you have no idea what you are talking about.

---

"Continue dunking on me?" If that doesn't sum up your delusional, self-inflated ego here, I don't know what does.

You know as well as me that DMCA is not even remotely but rather selectively enforced by twitter. There are thousands, if not millions, of videos that use other people's images without their permission that stay up if they don't offend the wrong sensibilities.

Why don't you just admit that this was a great video that the left is terrified black and undecided voters will see and might understand that Trump's not the racist that chumps like you make him out to be?

And speaking of black voters, another Rasmussen poll came out today saying black support of Trump now tops 40%. But because I'm discerning, I know Rasmussen polls tend to be outliers so I'm not buying it. But it is a strong indication that black support of Trump is growing much more than the left cares to admit. It's certainly nowhere near 8% anymore. And that has people like you terrified.

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

OaktownBear said:

---

Warning: This poster has a history of posting material sourced from an organization funded by the Russian government that has been forced by the Trump administration to register as a foreign agent.

---

---

Warning: This poster has a history of posting material sourced from an organization funded by the Russian government that has been forced by the Trump administration to register as a foreign agent.

---

---

You literally posted Russian propaganda.

---

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Twitter taking Trump's video down addressing the Floyd case and the protests is inexcusable. Using the pathetic pretext of an anonymous copyright claim is a joke. They just don't want his message to reach a mass audience.

It's a very good video and it scares them that it might put him in a good light with regard to race relations.

It's certainly a lot better than the tone deaf tweet he sent about bullets flying when violent protests start.



https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/6/5/21281787/twitter-trump-george-floyd-campaign-video-copyright

---

Warning: This poster has a history of posting material sourced from an organization funded by the Russian government that has been forced by the Trump administration to register as a foreign agent.

---

Anyone who's not a dimwitted stooge and has read even 10% of my posts will know that you, Unit2 and blungld's pathetic, pathological attempts to follow me around and try to discredit me with your gaslighting don't fool anyone with a brain. And yes, I'm using the word gaslighting today because you clowns hope if you continue to try and perpetuate the same lies over and over again, maybe people will start to believe you. Newsflash: No one with a brain will fall for it.

---

Because you asked for it, I'm going to continue dunking on you.

Although you are thoroughly unfamiliar with DMCA takedowns, I will tell you who isn't: Trump's campaign. If you click on the link (which you probably won't) and read it, you would see that it describes the Trump campaign accusing someone of violating their intellectual property rights and that the subject company immediately took down the content. That's how DMCA takedowns worst. You will also note that the person whose content was taken down challenged the company and had the challenge denied and then worked with an outside group to challenge it again and the company was convinced to host the content again. That same thing could happen here if Trump's campaign could rightfully make a claim that their use is permitted and not actually a copyright violation. They haven't made any such claim however. I suspect that the campaign will remove the infringing content and re-post the cleansed video.

I'm more than willing to have an argument on the merits here, but bearlyamazing is throughly uninterested in doing so because he isn't here to engage in a good faith discussion.

So if my posts in this thread have been a pathetic, pathological attempt to discredit you with gaslighting, it should be exceedingly easy for you to present substantive arguments in your favor. You have yet to do so. And, let's be honest, you won't do so because you have no idea what you are talking about.

---

"Continue dunking on me?" If that doesn't sum up your delusional, self-inflated ego here, I don't know what does.

You know as well as me that DMCA is not even remotely but rather selectively enforced by twitter. There are thousands, if not millions, of videos that use other people's images without their permission that stay up if they don't offend the wrong sensibilities.

Why don't you just admit that this was a great video that the left is terrified black and undecided voters will see and might understand that Trump's not the racist that chumps like you make him out to be?

And speaking of black voters, another Rasmussen poll came out today saying black support of Trump now tops 40%. But because I'm discerning, I know Rasmussen polls tend to be outliers so I'm not buying it. But it is a strong indication that black support of Trump is growing much more than the left cares to admit. It's certainly nowhere near 8% anymore. And that has people like you terrified.

---

The fact that you talk about Twitter enforcing the DMCA proves you have no idea what you are talking about. Twitter must comply with valid DMCA takedown requests, not "enforce" the DMCA. The whole point of the DMCA takedown process is that Twitter isn't obligated to sua sponte take down content that might be infringing. If you had any interest in this topic or in understanding what was actually happening, you would already know this.

Show me evidence of Twitter not responding to thousands, let alone millions, of DMCA takedown requests based on "sensibilities" or political bias or whatever else you think is going on.

Show your work. No one has any reason to believe your unverified speculation that they are selectively enforcing.

If you can prove me wrong, I will gladly acknowledge it in this thread* and unlike you I won't welch.

* following your apology to OTB for the Biden accusations you made not coming through and following you entering into the bet with blungld that you originally offered.

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Twitter taking Trump's video down addressing the Floyd case and the protests is inexcusable. Using the pathetic pretext of an anonymous copyright claim is a joke. They just don't want his message to reach a mass audience.

It's a very good video and it scares them that it might put him in a good light with regard to race relations.

It's certainly a lot better than the tone deaf tweet he sent about bullets flying when violent protests start.



https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/6/5/21281787/twitter-trump-george-floyd-campaign-video-copyright

---

Warning: This poster has a history of posting material sourced from an organization funded by the Russian government that has been forced by the Trump administration to register as a foreign agent.

---

Anyone who's not a dimwitted stooge and has read even 10% of my posts will know that you, Unit2 and blungld's pathetic, pathological attempts to follow me around and try to discredit me with your gaslighting don't fool anyone with a brain. And yes, I'm using the word gaslighting today because you clowns hope if you continue to try and perpetuate the same lies over and over again, maybe people will start to believe you. Newsflash: No one with a brain will fall for it.

---

Because you asked for it, I'm going to continue dunking on you.

Although you are thoroughly unfamiliar with DMCA takedowns, I will tell you who isn't: Trump's campaign. If you click on the link (which you probably won't) and read it, you would see that it describes the Trump campaign accusing someone of violating their intellectual property rights and that the subject company immediately took down the content. That's how DMCA takedowns worst. You will also note that the person whose content was taken down challenged the company and had the challenge denied and then worked with an outside group to challenge it again and the company was convinced to host the content again. That same thing could happen here if Trump's campaign could rightfully make a claim that their use is permitted and not actually a copyright violation. They haven't made any such claim however. I suspect that the campaign will remove the infringing content and re-post the cleansed video.

I'm more than willing to have an argument on the merits here, but bearlyamazing is throughly uninterested in doing so because he isn't here to engage in a good faith discussion.

So if my posts in this thread have been a pathetic, pathological attempt to discredit you with gaslighting, it should be exceedingly easy for you to present substantive arguments in your favor. You have yet to do so. And, let's be honest, you won't do so because you have no idea what you are talking about.

---

"Continue dunking on me?" If that doesn't sum up your delusional, self-inflated ego here, I don't know what does.

You know as well as me that DMCA is not even remotely but rather selectively enforced by twitter. There are thousands, if not millions, of videos that use other people's images without their permission that stay up if they don't offend the wrong sensibilities.

Why don't you just admit that this was a great video that the left is terrified black and undecided voters will see and might understand that Trump's not the racist that chumps like you make him out to be?

And speaking of black voters, another Rasmussen poll came out today saying black support of Trump now tops 40%. But because I'm discerning, I know Rasmussen polls tend to be outliers so I'm not buying it. But it is a strong indication that black support of Trump is growing much more than the left cares to admit. It's certainly nowhere near 8% anymore. And that has people like you terrified.

---

The fact that you talk about Twitter enforcing the DMCA proves you have no idea what you are talking about. Twitter must comply with valid DMCA takedown requests, not "enforce" the DMCA. The whole point of the DMCA takedown process is that Twitter isn't obligated to sua sponte take down content that might be infringing. If you had any interest in this topic or in understanding what was actually happening, you would already know this.

Show me evidence of Twitter not responding to thousands, let alone millions, of DMCA takedown requests based on "sensibilities" or political bias or whatever else you think is going on.

Show your work. No one has any reason to believe your unverified speculation that they are selectively enforcing.

If you can prove me wrong, I will gladly acknowledge it in this thread* and unlike you I won't welch.

* following your apology to OTB for the Biden accusations you made not coming through and following you entering into the bet with blungld that you originally offered.

---

Anxiously awaiting you obsessively continuing to follow me around with more of your silly challenges like you and your OCD compatriots here oaktown and blugld have taken to do in your pathetic attempt to shout me down or run me off. (Oh, this is a shame. I bet you have hearing problems and a bad leg? No wonder you're angry!)

What do you know about this supposed DMCA request (We wonder the same about you?) and it it (Oh my...and you studder too?) was legit, proven or even actually occurred? How do you know they're just not censoring content they're scared will win the hearts and minds of people who are looking for hope in these troubled times? (I'm looking for hope too...hope that you will just blow away!)

You don't. So get off your high horse and stop assuming you have all the answers and shooting the messenger. (Oh c'mon, you're mad because you haven't been invited to ride on his high horse too? Ain't that the truth?)

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

OaktownBear said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Twitter taking Trump's video down addressing the Floyd case and the protests is inexcusable. Using the pathetic pretext of an anonymous copyright claim is a joke. They just don't want his message to reach a mass audience.

It's a very good video and it scares them that it might put him in a good light with regard to race relations.

It's certainly a lot better than the tone deaf tweet he sent about bullets flying when violent protests start.



https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/6/5/21281787/twitter-trump-george-floyd-campaign-video-copyright

---

Warning: This poster has a history of posting material sourced from an organization funded by the Russian government that has been forced by the Trump administration to register as a foreign agent.

---

Anyone who's not a dimwitted stooge and has read even 10% of my posts will know that you, Unit2 and blungld's pathetic, pathological attempts to follow me around and try to discredit me with your gaslighting don't fool anyone with a brain. And yes, I'm using the word gaslighting today because you clowns hope if you continue to try and perpetuate the same lies over and over again, maybe people will start to believe you. Newsflash: No one with a brain will fall for it.

---

Because you asked for it, I'm going to continue dunking on you.

Although you are thoroughly unfamiliar with DMCA takedowns, I will tell you who isn't: Trump's campaign. If you click on the link (which you probably won't) and read it, you would see that it describes the Trump campaign accusing someone of violating their intellectual property rights and that the subject company immediately took down the content. That's how DMCA takedowns worst. You will also note that the person whose content was taken down challenged the company and had the challenge denied and then worked with an outside group to challenge it again and the company was convinced to host the content again. That same thing could happen here if Trump's campaign could rightfully make a claim that their use is permitted and not actually a copyright violation. They haven't made any such claim however. I suspect that the campaign will remove the infringing content and re-post the cleansed video.

I'm more than willing to have an argument on the merits here, but bearlyamazing is throughly uninterested in doing so because he isn't here to engage in a good faith discussion.

So if my posts in this thread have been a pathetic, pathological attempt to discredit you with gaslighting, it should be exceedingly easy for you to present substantive arguments in your favor. You have yet to do so. And, let's be honest, you won't do so because you have no idea what you are talking about.

---

"Continue dunking on me?" If that doesn't sum up your delusional, self-inflated ego here, I don't know what does.

You know as well as me that DMCA is not even remotely but rather selectively enforced by twitter. There are thousands, if not millions, of videos that use other people's images without their permission that stay up if they don't offend the wrong sensibilities.

Why don't you just admit that this was a great video that the left is terrified black and undecided voters will see and might understand that Trump's not the racist that chumps like you make him out to be?

And speaking of black voters, another Rasmussen poll came out today saying black support of Trump now tops 40%. But because I'm discerning, I know Rasmussen polls tend to be outliers so I'm not buying it. But it is a strong indication that black support of Trump is growing much more than the left cares to admit. It's certainly nowhere near 8% anymore. And that has people like you terrified.

---

The fact that you talk about Twitter enforcing the DMCA proves you have no idea what you are talking about. Twitter must comply with valid DMCA takedown requests, not "enforce" the DMCA. The whole point of the DMCA takedown process is that Twitter isn't obligated to sua sponte take down content that might be infringing. If you had any interest in this topic or in understanding what was actually happening, you would already know this.

Show me evidence of Twitter not responding to thousands, let alone millions, of DMCA takedown requests based on "sensibilities" or political bias or whatever else you think is going on.

Show your work. No one has any reason to believe your unverified speculation that they are selectively enforcing.

If you can prove me wrong, I will gladly acknowledge it in this thread* and unlike you I won't welch.

* following your apology to OTB for the Biden accusations you made not coming through and following you entering into the bet with blungld that you originally offered.

---

Anxiously awaiting you obsessively continuing to follow me around with more of your silly challenges like you and your OCD compatriots here oaktown and blugld have taken to do in your pathetic attempt to shout me down or run me off.

What do you know about this supposed DMCA request and it it was legit, proven or even actually occurred? How do you know they're just not censoring content they're scared will win the hearts and minds of people who are looking for hope in these troubled times?

You don't. So get off your high horse and stop assuming you have all the answers and shooting the messenger.

---