R.B.G. Passes

20,775 Views | 209 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by bearister
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
God rest her soul. SCOTUS may be on its way to becoming little more than a rubber stamp.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

God rest her soul. SCOTUS may be on its way to becoming little more than a rubber stamp.
Now Trump will be able to appoint a conservative justice who be a strict constitutionalist, thereby giving the court a very solid conservative majority.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RIP RBG. Although socially moderate and fiscally conservative, I always found her to be one of the good ones in
DC. A total class act. You do not have to agree to respect. RIP
Krugman Is A Moron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

God rest her soul. SCOTUS may be on its way to becoming little more than a rubber stamp.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Krugman Is A Moron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:

bearister said:

God rest her soul. SCOTUS may be on its way to becoming little more than a rubber stamp.
Now Trump will be able to appoint a conservative justice who be a strict constitutionalist, thereby giving the court a very solid conservative majority.
You would think that, but you'd be wrong.
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
classy /Sarcasm
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
Bearly Clad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rest in peace Ruth. When the courts are packed in 2021 we will lovingly pass the bill in your name. 13 Supreme Court Justices on the way, just one more case where FDR was ahead of his time
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She should have retired during Obama's term. Oh well, we get what we get.
Krugman Is A Moron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

She should have retired during Obama's term. Oh well, we get what we get.
Booth
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:

bearister said:

God rest her soul. SCOTUS may be on its way to becoming little more than a rubber stamp.
Now Trump will be able to appoint a conservative justice who be a strict constitutionalist, thereby giving the court a very solid conservative majority.


That will make tRump bullet proof. Any litigation regarding the election will be decided in his favor when it reaches the SCOTUS. If tRump ever gets convicted of any of the multiple felonies he has committed the SCOTUS will reverse the conviction.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Matthew Patel said:

sycasey said:

She should have retired during Obama's term. Oh well, we get what we get.
Booth

Yes, you are the only person who ever rendered that opinion ever.
Krugman Is A Moron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Matthew Patel said:

sycasey said:

She should have retired during Obama's term. Oh well, we get what we get.
Booth

Yes, you are the only person who ever rendered that opinion ever.
I hope Trump nominates Tara Reade to replace her
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This one is entirely on all the Bernie Crybabies who didn't vote for Hillary. This is the biggest and most expensive toy they broke in their psychotic rage. Thanks.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Krugman Is A Moron
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

This one is entirely on all the Bernie Crybabies who didn't vote for Hillary. This is the biggest and most expensive toy they broke in their psychotic rage. Thanks.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

She should have retired during Obama's term. Oh well, we get what we get.

How many years before the end of Obama's second term would she have needed to retire, where the Republican Senate would "let" Obama make the choice? At least two, eh?

If the Democrats can't find a way to stall this until January 20, they should disband as a political party and go play in a sand box somewhere. Effing Antonin Scalia died on FEBRUARY 13, 2016 and Obama nominated Merrick Garland on MARCH 16th!
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Russkies iced her.
Krugman Is A Moron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

The Russkies iced her.
So you're saying KGB got RGB?
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:

bearister said:

God rest her soul. SCOTUS may be on its way to becoming little more than a rubber stamp.
Now Trump will be able to appoint a conservative justice who be a strict constitutionalist, thereby giving the court a very solid conservative majority.
You really think that between now and Nov 3. I can hardly believe that. And if true, how can anything be done in the 40 something days left. I believe the outcome of the election will decide who is appointed.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

sycasey said:

She should have retired during Obama's term. Oh well, we get what we get.

How many years before the end of Obama's second term would she have needed to retire, where the Republican Congress would "let" Obama make the choice? At least two, eh?

Pretty much yeah.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

Golden One said:

bearister said:

God rest her soul. SCOTUS may be on its way to becoming little more than a rubber stamp.
Now Trump will be able to appoint a conservative justice who be a strict constitutionalist, thereby giving the court a very solid conservative majority.
You really think that between now and Nov 3. I can hardly believe that. And if true, how can anything be done in the 40 something days left. I believe the outcome of the election will decide who is appointed.

Trump's term runs until Jan 20th, even if he loses. He'd have until then.
bearlyamazing
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zero chance someone is appointed before the election
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OB66 - any #45 SC nominee can> will be confirmed by R senate at lame duck's first convenience <full stop>
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
Krugman Is A Moron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Big C said:

sycasey said:

She should have retired during Obama's term. Oh well, we get what we get.

How many years before the end of Obama's second term would she have needed to retire, where the Republican Congress would "let" Obama make the choice? At least two, eh?

Pretty much yeah.

It's OK now. Billy Barr will take care of any pitiful interference that Chuck Schumer tries to put up to keep Trump from naming her replacement.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

The Russkies iced her.


Now it's China's serve.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

RIP RBG. Although socially moderate and fiscally conservative, I always found her to be one of the good ones in
DC. A total class act. You do not have to agree to respect. RIP
Socially moderate? Are you kidding. She was the most liberal justice, socially and fiscally on the entire Court. She might have been more moderate than Bernie, but not by much.
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rest in peace, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Matthew Patel said:

Golden One said:

bearister said:

God rest her soul. SCOTUS may be on its way to becoming little more than a rubber stamp.
Now Trump will be able to appoint a conservative justice who be a strict constitutionalist, thereby giving the court a very solid conservative majority.
You would think that, but you'd be wrong.
I'm rarely wrong.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

sycasey said:

She should have retired during Obama's term. Oh well, we get what we get.

How many years before the end of Obama's second term would she have needed to retire, where the Republican Senate would "let" Obama make the choice? At least two, eh?

If the Democrats can't find a way to stall this until January 20, they should disband as a political party and go play in a sand box somewhere. Effing Antonin Scalia died on FEBRUARY 13, 2016 and Obama nominated Merrick Garland on MARCH 16th!
The only way the Democrats can stall this is if they get the help of rinos like Romney and Susan Collins.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearlyamazing said:

Zero chance someone is appointed before the election

Might be good politics for Trump to say he's going to take his time and find the best person for the job (and then to nominate somebody right after the election). Perhaps a great American like William Barr.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearlyamazing said:

Zero chance someone is appointed before the election
I'd say it's more like 100%. although the Republicans are less monolithic than the Democrats. If 4 Republicans vote with the Democrats to stop a nomination, there will be no appointment before
January 20. One never knows about Romney, Collins, etc.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Jesus, they didn't have a machine or something they could've put her on to keep her technically alive for four months?!?
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:

bearlyamazing said:

Zero chance someone is appointed before the election
I'd say it's more like 100%.

100% for before he leaves office, for sure.
bearlyamazing
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The only way Trump will get to pick a new justice is if it's after the election. And I wouldn't call it a solid conservative majority, even if he gets one. Roberts is very moderate and can go either way quite often.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

Golden One said:

bearlyamazing said:

Zero chance someone is appointed before the election
I'd say it's more like 100%.

100% for before he leaves office, for sure.
Right. My mistake. I meant before January 2021.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.