AunBear89 said:

---

No. Just that woman in particular. What I don't like about her has nothing to with sex or gender. She is an unintelligent and unpleasant person. Nepotism and plastic surgery make her what she is today, not brains and talent. Again: none of that has anything to do with her being a woman.

You Righties have a real problem with straw man arguments.

---

What message is Ivanka intending to convey here (from her Twitter account):



This is what it is telling me:




Ivanka Trump on Twitter: "Thank you Wisconsin! https://t.co/B9UjBHZuWm" / Twitter

*F her. Either she is tone death and brain dead or it was a threat.

sycasey said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

Dumb as a brick? No. Sexist accusation? Yes.

---

RWNJ's hate the racism / sexism conversation because they truly have no idea what those things are.

A woman can be dumb. That isn't sexism. I talked with a guy who did some business with Ivanka years ago. Said she had nothing to say. He interpreted it as her not having a clue and her handlers doing the real work. She's just a brand name - and one she didn't create.

---

I'm sure there is no sexism at all behind the frequent claims that Kamala Harris "slept her way to the top."

---

There's no need to say Kamala Harris "slept her way to the top".
She slept with a married man.

bearlyamazing said:

---

I've only seen one poster here say that and I'm sure it's in reference to comments Willie Brown himself made about him and Harris when she first started moving up politically.

Still in bad taste, though.

---

Probably was.
It's also in bad taste to sleep with a married man.

BearForce2 said:

---

It's also in bad taste to sleep with a married man.

---

opines red hat guy

BearForce2 said:

---

Abraham Lincoln was still more unpopular after helping to set Democrat owned slaves free.

---

BearForce2 said:

---

Big C said:

---

At this point, seeing where we're at and hearing his lame schtick for four years, even the 40-45% of the vote that Trump is going to get is some crazy-ass s***. That he would garner even 30% of the vote in this once-proud nation is astounding and embarrassing.

---

When was it a once proud nation? If you're a Democrat, we were never a once proud nation. We're a racist nation now and we were a nation of slaves previously when the Democrat owned them.

---

We ARE a proud nation, USA!

> we are proud super spreaders!

fify ^

BearForce2 said:

---

Energy independent.

---

BearForce2 said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

I've only seen one poster here say that and I'm sure it's in reference to comments Willie Brown himself made about him and Harris when she first started moving up politically.

Still in bad taste, though.

---

Probably was.
It's also in bad taste to sleep with a married man.

---

Where does raw dogging a porn star fit in on your Evangelical Moral Scale? Is it between watching your wife ball other men and sneaking into your adult son's friend's room in your own home and blowing him?

It's all bad.

tweet of god Cancelled, to the land of the lost..
twitter.com/TheTweetOfGod/status/1322691674141724672

caption needed..

ANTIFA at it again.

smh said:

---

tweet of god Cancelled, to the land of the lost..
twitter.com/TheTweetOfGod/status/1322691674141724672

---

Tweet of God:

Halloween is My third-favorite pagan holiday after Christmas and Easter

When Obama gets his statues built, the future leftists will want to tear them down also.

Unit2Sucks said:

---

bearlyamazing - I can't believe you missed an opportunity to hype the Durham report you keep promising is coming. Or have you, like Trump, come to determine that Wray and Barr aren't sufficiently loyal to him since they failed to deliver the goods.

I think this thread will age about as well as this exchange we had last year.

bearlyamazing said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

OMG bearlyamazing is my new favorite troll. I suspect he's a sock for someone who is trying to be funny because no one can seriously hold those views.

First, thanks for reminding me that Michael Flynn is a traitor and felon.

Second, thanks for reminding us that process crimes only matter when Hillary Clinton is alleged to have committed them.

Third, given that Trump has hand picked leadership at the DOJ, how is it that they have been completely unable to prove any wrongdoing whatsoever by the deep state, Obama or Clinton? Yet, that same hand picked group just convicted Roger Stone? And just arrested Rudy's Ukrainians buddies? I guess that is just more evidence of his effective Trump is as a leader.

---

!. How is General Flynn a traitor and a felon. Explain in detail. Don't just tell me he was convicted. Tell me what he did and why he's a traitor, in particular.

2. Destroying evidence and breaking federal laws on the handling of classified information is not a process crime. It's multiple felonies. If a flunky like Comey wasn't in charge, she and her assistants have been in a lot more trouble.

3. What other ways are people hired in the DOJ that aren't "hand-picked?" Please. Or should he have just retained Obama holdovers working against him? Again, please. Obama cleaned house like nobody's business, including the ambassadors.

4. Spare me the complete nonsense about the DOJ being "completely unable to prove any wrongdoing whatsoever by the deep state, Obama or Clinton." That contention will be funny to look back on when Durham and Barr's reports are done.

There's a reason the deep state is running scared.

---

---

In a last-minute shocker, it turns out that the Durham report isn't coming out after all. On the one hand bearlyamazing promised for months that it would be devastating and on the other hand there was zero evidence to believe that Durham's investigation would go anywhere. I just don't know if I can trust bearlyamazing's judgment any more.


How Trump and Barr's October Surprise Went Bust
The attorney general's pressure on John Durham nearly blew up the investigation that the president hoped would help swing the election.

Quote:

---

Durham, who is the U.S. Attorney for Connecticut, and Dannehy were also troubled that Barr had purposely misrepresented their work in numerous public comments, the two people said. According to two sources familiar with the probe, there has been no evidence found, after 18 months of investigation, to support Barr's claims that Trump was targeted by politically biased Obama officials to prevent his election. (The probe remains ongoing.) In fact, the sources said, the Durham investigation has so far uncovered no evidence of any wrongdoing by Biden or Barack Obama, or that they were even involved with the Russia investigation. There "was no evidence not even remotely indicating Obama or Biden did anything wrong," as one person put it.

---

Quote:

---

> I think this thread will age about as well as this exchange we had last year.

---

mutiple choices
o resist much, obey little
o vote early, vote often
o go bears, lets beat the covids

1:00 AM!