If so, please be brave enough to identify yourself. This is open to posters of all political stripes.
I'll bite. I am BearForce2 no relation to BearForce1. Thanks to me, you also believe Michelle Obama is a little cuckoo.B.A. Bearacus said:
If so, please be brave enough to identify yourself. This is open to posters of all political stripes.
BA BearacusBearNIt said:
Not one ****ing bit. It's interesting that all his posts have 3 stars. Why is that? What 3 BI members would star every one of his posts less than 24 hours after his return?
Wait for it, wait for the 3 stars!BearForce2 said:BA BearacusBearNIt said:
Not one ****ing bit. It's interesting that all his posts have 3 stars. Why is that? What 3 BI members would star every one of his posts less than 24 hours after his return?
AunBear
okaydo
okaydo said:
Rank all the BI posters whose screen names end with 1 or 2.
So right, but you know, lots of people do like echo chambers.Big C said:
I sort of did. Sure, most of his stuff is a recital of right wing talking points, but I never found him to be obnoxious. And occasionally, he was funny or reasonable. (Not all that often, but still... )
A forum like this gets pretty boring when everybody pretty much agrees and the biggest controversies concern who's a DINO, a LINO, a PINO, etc.
I did not miss you. But - I like the new you more than the old you. The old you sounded like somebody who was seriously going to get a visit from the Secret Service. It was too much even for a Trump hater like me. I enjoy your posts. Thanks for coming back.concordtom said:
Did anyone miss ME?
Roughly 9 months.
It is not a matter of echo chambers.LMK5 said:So right, but you know, lots of people do like echo chambers.Big C said:
I sort of did. Sure, most of his stuff is a recital of right wing talking points, but I never found him to be obnoxious. And occasionally, he was funny or reasonable. (Not all that often, but still... )
A forum like this gets pretty boring when everybody pretty much agrees and the biggest controversies concern who's a DINO, a LINO, a PINO, etc.
OaktownBear said:It is not a matter of echo chambers.LMK5 said:So right, but you know, lots of people do like echo chambers.Big C said:
I sort of did. Sure, most of his stuff is a recital of right wing talking points, but I never found him to be obnoxious. And occasionally, he was funny or reasonable. (Not all that often, but still... )
A forum like this gets pretty boring when everybody pretty much agrees and the biggest controversies concern who's a DINO, a LINO, a PINO, etc.
BF was always a useless poster. He posts one liners that are devoid of thought. I simply didn't care about him. If others find that entertaining, fine with me.
However, shortly before the election he started a practice of just bombing the board with a high volume of posts either starting multiple new threads or bumping old threads to the top with the clear objective of trying to interfere with the discourse here. He was literally up at 3 am posting 33 times over a short period to screw up the board. He was even more prolific leading up to the election posting at time like 75 times in a few hours in the middle of the night. That tactic is not acceptable on a message board. It makes it near impossible to have a discussion because he is deliberately pushing threads down the bottom of the page before anyone could respond. It has nothing to do with being conservative. It is a clear violation of board policy. There have been a few others that have gone mental in the same manner on the boards for their own personal reasons (frankly, it usually appears they have gone to war with the mods and decided to blow the place up on their way out). They have all gotten time outs or banned. You simply don't do that.
Well, after flooding the board with 50 posts in 18 hours, BF2 has been radio silent for about 20 hours now. Maybe he's had the shortest return from time out in BI history.sycasey said:OaktownBear said:It is not a matter of echo chambers.LMK5 said:So right, but you know, lots of people do like echo chambers.Big C said:
I sort of did. Sure, most of his stuff is a recital of right wing talking points, but I never found him to be obnoxious. And occasionally, he was funny or reasonable. (Not all that often, but still... )
A forum like this gets pretty boring when everybody pretty much agrees and the biggest controversies concern who's a DINO, a LINO, a PINO, etc.
BF was always a useless poster. He posts one liners that are devoid of thought. I simply didn't care about him. If others find that entertaining, fine with me.
However, shortly before the election he started a practice of just bombing the board with a high volume of posts either starting multiple new threads or bumping old threads to the top with the clear objective of trying to interfere with the discourse here. He was literally up at 3 am posting 33 times over a short period to screw up the board. He was even more prolific leading up to the election posting at time like 75 times in a few hours in the middle of the night. That tactic is not acceptable on a message board. It makes it near impossible to have a discussion because he is deliberately pushing threads down the bottom of the page before anyone could respond. It has nothing to do with being conservative. It is a clear violation of board policy. There have been a few others that have gone mental in the same manner on the boards for their own personal reasons (frankly, it usually appears they have gone to war with the mods and decided to blow the place up on their way out). They have all gotten time outs or banned. You simply don't do that.
Yup. It's not conservatism or even the combative nature that's the issue. It's the spamming. You can't have real conversations with that going on.
Eastern Oregon Bear said:Well, after flooding the board with 50 posts in 18 hours, BF2 has been radio silent for about 20 hours now. Maybe he's had the shortest return from time out in BI history.sycasey said:OaktownBear said:It is not a matter of echo chambers.LMK5 said:So right, but you know, lots of people do like echo chambers.Big C said:
I sort of did. Sure, most of his stuff is a recital of right wing talking points, but I never found him to be obnoxious. And occasionally, he was funny or reasonable. (Not all that often, but still... )
A forum like this gets pretty boring when everybody pretty much agrees and the biggest controversies concern who's a DINO, a LINO, a PINO, etc.
BF was always a useless poster. He posts one liners that are devoid of thought. I simply didn't care about him. If others find that entertaining, fine with me.
However, shortly before the election he started a practice of just bombing the board with a high volume of posts either starting multiple new threads or bumping old threads to the top with the clear objective of trying to interfere with the discourse here. He was literally up at 3 am posting 33 times over a short period to screw up the board. He was even more prolific leading up to the election posting at time like 75 times in a few hours in the middle of the night. That tactic is not acceptable on a message board. It makes it near impossible to have a discussion because he is deliberately pushing threads down the bottom of the page before anyone could respond. It has nothing to do with being conservative. It is a clear violation of board policy. There have been a few others that have gone mental in the same manner on the boards for their own personal reasons (frankly, it usually appears they have gone to war with the mods and decided to blow the place up on their way out). They have all gotten time outs or banned. You simply don't do that.
Yup. It's not conservatism or even the combative nature that's the issue. It's the spamming. You can't have real conversations with that going on.
OaktownBear said:It is not a matter of echo chambers.LMK5 said:So right, but you know, lots of people do like echo chambers.Big C said:
I sort of did. Sure, most of his stuff is a recital of right wing talking points, but I never found him to be obnoxious. And occasionally, he was funny or reasonable. (Not all that often, but still... )
A forum like this gets pretty boring when everybody pretty much agrees and the biggest controversies concern who's a DINO, a LINO, a PINO, etc.
BF was always a useless poster. He posts one liners that are devoid of thought. I simply didn't care about him. If others find that entertaining, fine with me.
However, shortly before the election he started a practice of just bombing the board with a high volume of posts either starting multiple new threads or bumping old threads to the top with the clear objective of trying to interfere with the discourse here. He was literally up at 3 am posting 33 times over a short period to screw up the board. He was even more prolific leading up to the election posting at time like 75 times in a few hours in the middle of the night. That tactic is not acceptable on a message board. It makes it near impossible to have a discussion because he is deliberately pushing threads down the bottom of the page before anyone could respond. It has nothing to do with being conservative. It is a clear violation of board policy. There have been a few others that have gone mental in the same manner on the boards for their own personal reasons (frankly, it usually appears they have gone to war with the mods and decided to blow the place up on their way out). They have all gotten time outs or banned. You simply don't do that.
AunBear89 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Well, after flooding the board with 50 posts in 18 hours, BF2 has been radio silent for about 20 hours now. Maybe he's had the shortest return from time out in BI history.sycasey said:OaktownBear said:It is not a matter of echo chambers.LMK5 said:So right, but you know, lots of people do like echo chambers.Big C said:
I sort of did. Sure, most of his stuff is a recital of right wing talking points, but I never found him to be obnoxious. And occasionally, he was funny or reasonable. (Not all that often, but still... )
A forum like this gets pretty boring when everybody pretty much agrees and the biggest controversies concern who's a DINO, a LINO, a PINO, etc.
BF was always a useless poster. He posts one liners that are devoid of thought. I simply didn't care about him. If others find that entertaining, fine with me.
However, shortly before the election he started a practice of just bombing the board with a high volume of posts either starting multiple new threads or bumping old threads to the top with the clear objective of trying to interfere with the discourse here. He was literally up at 3 am posting 33 times over a short period to screw up the board. He was even more prolific leading up to the election posting at time like 75 times in a few hours in the middle of the night. That tactic is not acceptable on a message board. It makes it near impossible to have a discussion because he is deliberately pushing threads down the bottom of the page before anyone could respond. It has nothing to do with being conservative. It is a clear violation of board policy. There have been a few others that have gone mental in the same manner on the boards for their own personal reasons (frankly, it usually appears they have gone to war with the mods and decided to blow the place up on their way out). They have all gotten time outs or banned. You simply don't do that.
Yup. It's not conservatism or even the combative nature that's the issue. It's the spamming. You can't have real conversations with that going on.
Or he's trying to source more Larry Elder tweets to post.
sycasey said:OaktownBear said:It is not a matter of echo chambers.LMK5 said:So right, but you know, lots of people do like echo chambers.Big C said:
I sort of did. Sure, most of his stuff is a recital of right wing talking points, but I never found him to be obnoxious. And occasionally, he was funny or reasonable. (Not all that often, but still... )
A forum like this gets pretty boring when everybody pretty much agrees and the biggest controversies concern who's a DINO, a LINO, a PINO, etc.
BF was always a useless poster. He posts one liners that are devoid of thought. I simply didn't care about him. If others find that entertaining, fine with me.
However, shortly before the election he started a practice of just bombing the board with a high volume of posts either starting multiple new threads or bumping old threads to the top with the clear objective of trying to interfere with the discourse here. He was literally up at 3 am posting 33 times over a short period to screw up the board. He was even more prolific leading up to the election posting at time like 75 times in a few hours in the middle of the night. That tactic is not acceptable on a message board. It makes it near impossible to have a discussion because he is deliberately pushing threads down the bottom of the page before anyone could respond. It has nothing to do with being conservative. It is a clear violation of board policy. There have been a few others that have gone mental in the same manner on the boards for their own personal reasons (frankly, it usually appears they have gone to war with the mods and decided to blow the place up on their way out). They have all gotten time outs or banned. You simply don't do that.
Yup. It's not conservatism or even the combative nature that's the issue. It's the spamming. You can't have real conversations with that going on.
Thanks.dajo9 said:I did not miss you. But - I like the new you more than the old you. The old you sounded like somebody who was seriously going to get a visit from the Secret Service. It was too much even for a Trump hater like me. I enjoy your posts. Thanks for coming back.concordtom said:
Did anyone miss ME?
Roughly 9 months.
Big C said:
I sort of did. Sure, most of his stuff is a recital of right wing talking points, but I never found him to be obnoxious. And occasionally, he was funny or reasonable. (Not all that often, but still... )
A forum like this gets pretty boring when everybody pretty much agrees and the biggest controversies concern who's a DINO, a LINO, a PINO, etc.
Less than 20 minutes later and that thread is gone. Thanks for pointing it out for the moderators.sycasey said:
This here is another thread created purely to spam this board with link after link on the same topic:
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/100076
Exactly the kind of thing that earned BearForce2 his original ban. It should happen again.
as happens lots..sycasey said:
This here is another thread created purely to spam this board with link after link on the same topic:
bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/100076
Exactly the kind of thing that earned BearF*rce2 his original ban. It should happen again.
[ol]sycasey said:
This here is another thread created purely to spam this board with link after link on the same topic:
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/100076
Exactly the kind of thing that earned BearForce2 his original ban. It should happen again.
okaydo said:
Just imagine if BF2 was wealthy like the rioters. Holy sh*t!
Thank god he couldn't afford to participate in the insurrection.
Personally, I find this kind of hypothetical to be outrageous, distasteful, and beneath the dignity of a Cal grad. That said, can someone please ask BF2 if he can eat non-organic food?okaydo said:
Just imagine if BF2 was wealthy like the rioters. Holy sh*t!
Thank god he couldn't afford to participate in the insurrection.
B.A. Bearacus said:
Personally, I find this kind of hypothetical to be outrageous, distasteful, and beneath the dignity of a Cal grad. That said, can someone please ask BF2 if he can eat non-organic food?
BearForce2 said:[ol]sycasey said:
This here is another thread created purely to spam this board with link after link on the same topic:
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/100076
Exactly the kind of thing that earned BearForce2 his original ban. It should happen again.False and/or defamatory Inaccurate Abusive Vulgar Hateful Harassing Obscene Profane Sexually oriented Threatening Invasive of a person's privacy Thread Hijacking (knowingly redirecting the subject of a thread) Post padding (posting for the sole purpose of increasing post count) Trolling (posting to purposefully antagonize other posters) An attempt to get around the profanity filter Removal of moderator/staff edits from post Otherwise in violation of any law [/ol]
Spam isn't listed and what I posted wasn't even spam, you just didn't like the content.
panda said:
Ban him again.
sycasey said:BearForce2 said:[ol]sycasey said:
This here is another thread created purely to spam this board with link after link on the same topic:
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/100076
Exactly the kind of thing that earned BearForce2 his original ban. It should happen again.False and/or defamatory Inaccurate Abusive Vulgar Hateful Harassing Obscene Profane Sexually oriented Threatening Invasive of a person's privacy Thread Hijacking (knowingly redirecting the subject of a thread) Post padding (posting for the sole purpose of increasing post count) Trolling (posting to purposefully antagonize other posters) An attempt to get around the profanity filter Removal of moderator/staff edits from post Otherwise in violation of any law [/ol]
Spam isn't listed and what I posted wasn't even spam, you just didn't like the content.
Take your case to the mods if you don't like it.