Bobodeluxe;842832884 said:
I would donate my change can if that would help.
Same here. Cal Basketball is one of my sources of joy. I am still looking forward to being at Haas, rooting.
Bobodeluxe;842832884 said:
I would donate my change can if that would help.
Shocky1;842832863 said:
mike told a donor last week that the dedicated practice facility can still be built, the unvarnished truth is that williams & athletic development director jeremy wang do not have even a lead donor anymore or a realistic plan to getting this done because of their dysfunctional communication skills...if it couldn't move forward with a $10 million dollars lead donation, how's it gonna be built with no fronting money?
HoopDreams;842832917 said:
Jordan Fines of the Cal softball team
[video=youtube;CfbHhImSy4w][/video]
socaliganbear;842832880 said:
If the Associate AD for Development isn't developing for the revenue sports, why is he employed?
stu;842832790 said:
[URL="http://blogs.dailynews.com/preps/2017/02/26/boys-basketball-war-floor-senior-night-valley-set-sat-april-15-burroughs-high/"][COLOR="#0000FF"]War on the Floor[/COLOR][/URL]
pierrezo;842832932 said:
There's a young man named Remy Martin on Team 1.
OdontoBear66;842832990 said:
Might I suggest (not knowing) that the major donors may be so upset with the academic stifling of athletic programs (call it the Barsky effect) that they see their only recourse as to that unhappiness being expressed in holding back funds. Not that I like the idea, but seems to me, their choice. The academic side has never seemed to see the parallelism between funding for sports and academics.
Shocky1;842832996 said:
the misuse of meb funds on operational recruiting costs
Shocky1;842833024 said:
socal, martin was very upset that meb funds which were intended as discretionary funds for the head coach were misused on recruiting operational costs
not as big a deal as the practicing at berkeley high school 3 times last season but definitely a factor in the dealmaker's decision to exit berkeley's "amateur hour"
did you notice that during his introductory presser in missouri that he made a point of praising the administrators within their athletic department?
socaltownie;842833038 said:
Yeah - but the only thing I don't know (and that is why I said likely mostly williams but maybe martin is if the conversation went something like this...."
dealmaker: I need to fly to X to go see the best new thing play AAU and be seen in the stands and talk with his folks at halftime
Uncommunicative Dolt: We are already over budget cause you have been really putting on the miles at $.70 cents per to go see games in Elk Grove
Dealmaker: But this kid is DOPE and has a great GPA and Shock LOVES him cause he can feather a four iron AND hit a baseline jumper. I really need to go.
Uncommunicative Dolt: We could use the MEB
DealMaker: Don't do THAT! It is double dope! But I need to go.
Uncommunicative Dolt: Well it is that or you stay home and practce at BHS.
DealMaker: Grumble <thinks to himself that mizzu is likely to be open and humidity might be a ***** but one can learn to suffer>
Shocky1;842833117 said:
you got some talent, so cal
the martin departure started when his oldest son (3.67 gpa) was wait listed for cal, in speaking with roberta it was very clear that keeping the family together in berkeley was a priority
i told this to mike williams at last year's basketball banquet & he didn't seem too concerned...i followed up with a couple of emails that of course never get any response at all
so then the martin's son enrolls at purdue & i told several confidants including my monster partner hoop dreams that this was dangerous times
to be honest with you, cal's administration never thought martin was gonna leave, they never bothered to speak with prospects like joe pasternak & dennis gates until it was too late (you don't get to know job candidates during the interview process, you talk to them months & sometimes even years in advance, professionals plan for all contingencies, "amateurs" just hope for the best)
coach wyking is gonna get the job done, he's assembled a remarkable staff with tim, theo & chris...recruiting is already ramping up for cal's started at the bottom class (2018)
socaltownie;842833123 said:
Here is the thing. I would have had a COW if Marin's kid had gotten in with a special waiver.
Cause, in terms of Net bottom line PROFIT, faculty that are bringing in NSF/grant money (and thus paying the 60% overhead "vig" to the university) are making MUCH more Net for the University than Martin. They don't get SQUAT in terms of advantages in the admissions process for their kids. Nor should they. But if you want to see torches come out and the long knives be stuck get a waiver for a coaches' kid.
Now I get for Martin that is probably new water. But it is the right thing at a Public university.
PS. Completely agree about the uncommunicative dolt. You have to work the final 4, coaches conventions, conference media day RELENTLESSLY and always need a short list of 3-4 revenue coaches on speed dial. You can take 3 weeks and butcher a search for the Golf Coach (BTW - we have a great one) cause in the end it just isn't that critical to the revenue of the department. You HAVE to hit a 2 iron FLUSH on the approach at Torrey South 12 into a stiff breeze everytime you do a search for a candidate in one of the 2 revenue sports.
HoopDreams;842833259 said:
So a 3.7 GPA under represented minority can't get into cal on their own merits?
If that's the case, the problem is something else entirely
socaltownie;842833265 said:
Remember Prop 215. Aint such a thing as a minority in cal admissions. Being the son of a multi-millionaire probably isn't helping on the hardship part of the essay. It is why SCT Jr. is probably much more likely to get into MIT, Cal Tech or Furd than Cal. Just is what it is.
HoopDreams;842833267 said:
No I didn't know about prop 215, but I can guess what it is
UrsaMajor;842833251 said:
I do know of kids of 8 figure donors who got no special consideration and didn't get in.
OldBlue1999;842833283 said:
Holy sh!t, that's shockingly stupid even for Cal. And they wonder why they have problems fundraising. At some point there are values and then there are guidelines. It's really not too difficult to figure out that to get what you need you're gonna have to at least be reasonable. If faculty really has a problem with this kind of thing then they're incredibly short-sighted and not nearly as smart as they think they are. I mean, do they want full endowments or not? Pay for play makes the world go 'round. Get over it.
OldBlue1999;842833283 said:
Holy sh!t, that's shockingly stupid even for Cal. And they wonder why they have problems fundraising. At some point there are values and then there are guidelines. It's really not too difficult to figure out that to get what you need you're gonna have to at least be reasonable. If faculty really has a problem with this kind of thing then they're incredibly short-sighted and not nearly as smart as they think they are. I mean, do they want full endowments or not? Pay for play makes the world go 'round. Get over it.
OldBlue1999;842833283 said:
Holy sh!t, that's shockingly stupid even for Cal. And they wonder why they have problems fundraising. At some point there are values and then there are guidelines. It's really not too difficult to figure out that to get what you need you're gonna have to at least be reasonable. If faculty really has a problem with this kind of thing then they're incredibly short-sighted and not nearly as smart as they think they are. I mean, do they want full endowments or not? Pay for play makes the world go 'round. Get over it.
socaltownie;842833295 said:
<sigh>. People REALLY should understand the laws of the state before opining on what is stupid. Cal would be doing illegal acts if it did that. And if it somehow got the law changed it is FAR more likely that the kids of union leaders would be forced upon the university rater than donors as that is the straw that stirs the current ruling cabal in Sacramento.
HoopDreams;842833259 said:
So a 3.7 GPA under represented minority can't get into cal on their own merits?
If that's the case, the problem is something else entirely
OldBlue1999;842833319 said:
What's the cite?