Big C_Cal;842850958 said:
Sure would be nice to be able to come up with an inside player for 2018 who arrives with some strength and experience. Grad transfer? JC guy? 20 yr old Euro?
none of the above#
Big C_Cal;842850958 said:
Sure would be nice to be able to come up with an inside player for 2018 who arrives with some strength and experience. Grad transfer? JC guy? 20 yr old Euro?
Shocky1;842836887 said:
the new cal staff is keeping an eye on 6'7" 180 lbs wing mason forbes of folsom, his sister kenzie is a california golden bear commit for coach gottlieb, both are in the 2018 class
mason is flying under the radar right now but he got a 4.0 gpa but more importantly he got great (not good) hair...moms sasha can't ball at all but dad sterling toured with the harlem globetrotters for 10 years
http://www.sacbee.com/sports/high-school/joe-davidson/article56942893.html
the university of california, berkeley=#1 ranked public (#3 overall) university in the world (and a short drive from folsom, stockton & roseville on game days)
Shocky1;842850961 said:
bob, if I had a 3.0 gpa i wouldn't go around bragging about it, it's not like you ever hiked grouse grind or something
OdontoBear66;842850976 said:
Careful shocky. There are 3.0s (FB and BB players in HS with few AP courses), and then there are 3.0s (Chem E majors at Cal). There is also a question of when his 3.0 was achieved. Back in the 60s a 3.4 in pre-dental studies got me into UCSF as one of 75 out of about 1000 or so. Things were graded on a pretty strict curve in the days of yore.
Shocky1;842850961 said:
bob, if I had a 3.0 gpa i wouldn't go around bragging about it, it's not like you ever hiked grouse grind or something
caltagjohnson;842850739 said:
The "climate science" is a hoax. It is a liberal distribution scheme which has nothing to do with the atmosphere. I looked at some of the published papers. I was a Chem E at Call. I would have been failed if I turned in that kind of "science".
Shocky1;842849798 said:
souse, we watched land ho! & while it provided a lot of scenic points of interest of the nordic island nation, listening to 2 old white dudes talking & talking about nothing for 90 minutes was kinda painful
look i don't make movies (at least not commercial movies for public distribution) but i kinda think it would've been a better movie if the outdated (which is odd for a move released in 2014) music soundtrack was replaced & if the lead roles were played by 3 curvy brunette yoga females with flat stomachs or something
the blue lagoon (clothes are for losers)#:bluecarrot:
GB54;842849967 said:
Iceland is nothing but moody alcoholic detectives staring into the abyss. The sushi and yoga sucks.
Bobodeluxe;842851412 said:
A ponytail is NOT a man bun.
stu;842851041 said:
At Cal I was a Physical Sciences field major, mostly physics and a long time ago, so I'm not qualified to judge climate research. But I think physics is inherently simpler (not easier, just more fundamental) than climate science, life sciences, and social sciences so I wouldn't expect papers in those fields to match the standards of papers in physics. However I work with people who have advanced degrees in fields closely related to climate and they all agree humans are causing a big problem. Not necessarily for someone my age in my location, I expect to see plenty more nice days. But I don't have to buy flood insurance for grandchildren in Florida.
Unfortunately I think the argument has become more economic and political than scientific as there's so much money to be made in fossil fuels. Probably more than in other politicized industries such as tobacco, drugs, pesticides, asbestos, lead, firearms, etc. This is America - to get the answer follow the money.
Shocky1;842851422 said:
nba summer league: boston celtics vs san antonio spurs
jaylen brown: 6 points on 2-6 field goals with 0-4 on 3 pointers along with 8 boards, 2 assists, a steal & 4 turnovers in 25 minutes
jabari bird: no points on 0-2 fields along with 2 blocks & an assist in 12 minutes
attack the basket, bird#
socaltownie;842851417 said:
+1. The climate science is fairly indisuptable. The issue is that many in the climate science field don't stop there and then try to become economists, political scientists, philosphers, and moralists.
Shocky1;842851415 said:
sure hope the above post don't give derek "supercuts" king & dontae "gonna change my look monthly" coleman any really bad ******* manscape ideas
the monster is here to educate not obfuscate
mikecohen;842851445 said:
Somebody has to take those steps, if the economists, political scientists, philosophers and moralists don't, such that nothing otherwise gets done.
socaltownie;842851501 said:
Here is what I mean by that. The "consensus" in the climate scientist community is that things must be done NOW! I mean NOW!!
And yet - baring significant breakthroughs in energy storage, distribution, and alternative energy manufacturing capability, that would doom about 2 billion people currently living in back breaking poverty to continued back breaking poverty. It isn't clear that, "net" more people wouldn't be better off with 5 degree C increase if what that meant was that you could electrify and modernize a huge swatch of the planet.
Now that is an awfully bleak future. It isn't fun to talk about (because a whole bunch of OTHER people are going to suffer from that 5 degree increase). There is a reason that economics is called the dismal science But that is what I mean by the climate scientists getting involved in fields they don't understand. When climate scientists wish away the problem of global poverty and development I roll my eyes and want to show them how to go back to find the science buildings.
socaltownie;842851501 said:
Here is what I mean by that. The "consensus" in the climate scientist community is that things must be done NOW! I mean NOW!!
And yet - baring significant breakthroughs in energy storage, distribution, and alternative energy manufacturing capability, that would doom about 2 billion people currently living in back breaking poverty to continued back breaking poverty. It isn't clear that, "net" more people wouldn't be better off with 5 degree C increase if what that meant was that you could electrify and modernize a huge swatch of the planet.
Now that is an awfully bleak future. It isn't fun to talk about (because a whole bunch of OTHER people are going to suffer from that 5 degree increase). There is a reason that economics is called the dismal science But that is what I mean by the climate scientists getting involved in fields they don't understand. When climate scientists wish away the problem of global poverty and development I roll my eyes and want to show them how to go back to find the science buildings.
mikecohen;842851623 said:
The climate scientists are screaming into the wind, embarking on the (at least initially) apparently hopeless task of getting people to pay attention to the true facts.
The true facts being ignored in favor of "cant" is a political problem the results of which in human history are often if not always the most catastrophic events.
The answer to the climate scientists' inability to call on expertise in other fields that they don't have is NOT for them to stop, by ringing the tocsin, trying to motivate the people in those other fields, who can actually help the situation, to act.
Climate scientists crying emergency up against a wall of failure to deal with the problem on the part of people who have the expertise and/or power to do something about it is not blameworthy.
To me, it's analogous to members of a group which continues to suffer from discrimination and oppression being criticized for the manner in which they express the horribleness of the situation - like persons who are hit hard and painfully being criticized for the manner in which they say "Ouch".
The fact that the way in which a proposed fix of an emergency creates other problems requires figuring out another way, not censorship.
In any case, I suspect you've set up a straw man. I don't know of any climate scientists who advocate screwing the poor, or damning the torpedos - full speed ahead.
Anyhow, thank PWB for his support. Bears will be Bears; and the world, ultimately, is a better place for it.
Shocky1;842851622 said:
so cal basketball junkie told me that scott washington is a 6'3" guard that can score at all 3 levels & that he will be entering st john bosco as a 2021 class prospect with a tremendous upside...scott's dad is former cal great chris washington (elementary math school teacher/aau coach) who played with kevin johnson (nba all star/former mayor of sacramento), david butler (investment management in manhattan beach), richard chang (runs costco in taiwan), leonard taylor (undercover cop), jon wheeler (insurance broker in bay area), jeff huling (real estate broker in seattle), eddie javius (educational consultant in fresno), jim beatie (insurance broker in seattle), bart koenitzer (medical supplies in bay area), earnie sears (educator in palmdale), michael taylor (wine distributor owner in bay area) & harmut ortmann (played pro ball 10 years in germany)
50 year decision (the streak)#:gobears: