Story Poster
Cal Football

A look at Cal's 2025 Opponents - 1st Half of the Schedule

July 10, 2025
3,060

Note:  We’ve omitted Texas Southern given the lack of research data and the fact that Cal will likely be a 30+ point favorite in the game.

1st Half Schedule

Oregon State:

Vs 2024 - Slightly Improved.   Defense will take a step forward as will their skill position talent on Offense

Offseason - Mixed.  Oregon State lost a handful of their best players while adding a large number of middle of the road transfers

Offense:  The Beavers were solid in 2024 on offense relative to their competition, with a nice mix of receiver and running back talent and a solid OL.  For 2025, they’ve improved their QB talent and return most of their receiving and running backs.   The issue is their decimated Offensive Line

Defense:  Oregon State struggled in 2024 on defense, albeit with one of the youngest starting 11s in college football.  They return a lot on the DL and in the secondary, while losing their best playmaker at LB.  This unit should be improved, the question is by how much.

Coaching - Trent Bray had a nice FCS resume and did a solid job in 2024.  The 2nd year under quality coaches generally sees improvement

Biggest Weakness - Their OL lost their one quality player and is now a hodge podge of 2nd tier transfers and returning players of little renown.  They played very poorly during Spring practice

Overall -  If this game was in Berkeley, it’d be easy to peg the Bears as two touchdwon + favorites.  Playing in Corvallis will give the Beavers a boost and this should be a modestly improved team.   The Bears will have a decided overall talent and depth advantage and should be able to win the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball, leading to an opening road win for Cal

Minnesota:

Vs. 2024 - A minor step back after a solid 5-4 B10 finish in 2024. The Gophers lost only one game by more than a score.  2025 will see them breaking in a young QB, rebuilding their OL and finding back seven depth on defense

Offseason - Mixed to positive.  The Gophers lost a lot to graduation and their most promising OL to the portal.  They did well restocking their WR and RB corps and finished with the #17 portal class per On3

Offense:  Last season, Minnesota were an efficient offensive team with a sixth year game managing QB, good WR talent and a decent run game.   In 2025, they break in a younger first time QB and need to replace three OL starters.  They have lots of options at WR via portal additions and they reloaded an already strong RB room

Defense:  In 2024 this was a top third B10 defense that was elite in pass coverage while being solid against the run. They return a star safety and two stout DL along with quite a few starters from elsewhere via the portal.  Depth up front and finding enough pass rush are outstanding items heading into 2025.  

Coaching:  PJ Fleck’s seen his star dim slightly as it hasn’t been as easy as he would have liked to accumulate talent in Minnesota.  That said, he’s done well with what’s he had and is always a tough out in the Big 10

Biggest Weakness:  Similar to the Bears, the Gophers biggest question is at QB where RS Freshman Drake Lindsay is poised to start.  He was a relative sleeper out of HS but has good size and is naturally accurate

Overall - On paper, this will be among Cal’s most difficult 2025 opponents with a solid combination of talent, experience and good coaching.   The long road trip will be a factor for the Gophers after two home non conference cupcakes.  This may come down to whichever teams rebuilt OL is stronger.  

San Diego State:

Vs 2024 - Slightly improved after a disappointing 2024.   It’s a veteran defense that returns a ton of starters.   The OL comes back mostly intact as well, though they have to rebuild across all the skill positions

Offseason - Solid.  Two top prep recruit QBs transferred in, neither having done much.  They had a sprinkling of decent transfer ins including former Cal RB Byron Cardwell and didn’t lose much of importance

Offense - This was a bottom quartile MWC offense in 2024 and it’s not clear they’ve done much to improve unless one of their transfer QBs materializes as a difference maker.  The OL is likely to be mildly improved but the loss of their stud RB will hurt

Defense - Another bottom quartile MWC unit last season, they return ten starters and add more depth via the portal.  There’s a preseason all conference DL and LB among the returners and this unit almost can’t help but be materially improved

Coaching:  Another 2nd year coach looking for a Sophomore season boost.   Recruiting is on the upswing and those close to the program believe they are headed the right direction

Biggest Weakness:   They were crippled by poor QB play a year ago and it’s far from clear whether that’s improved as their likely starter was 4th string at Michigan in 2024

Overall - This a football team that’s likely a year away from being truly competitive in the MWC and they offer the least amount of talent and depth among the Bears FBS opponents.  Hosting the game will help the Aztecs but not enough to alter the outcome

Boston College:

Vs 2024 - A step back from a .500 ACC performance in 2024.  Gone to Florida State is the dangerous if erratic Thomas Castellanos at QB as well as 1st round NFL draft choice, Edge rusher Ezeiruaku.  

Offseason - Decent.  Other than a few key graduations and the loss of Castellanos, BC had a solid offseason, getting a good number of P4 level transfers, albeit very few proven starters to offset a handful of losses of some of their more promising youngsters

Offense - The Eagles had a middle of the road ACC unit in 2024.  While Castellanos was disappointing in ’24, his legs were still a big part of the offense   They are experienced at WR and TE and talented if less proven at RB.   The QB battle between James who replaced Castellanos and Bama back up QB Loevgren will be interesting to watch

Defense - This was a below average ACC defense but it wasn’t bad.   Their secondary returns mostly intact and could be special.  The questions are along on the DL, where they have to replace a lot of experience and production.  They did well in the portal with edge rushers and should mount a solid pass rush

Coaching:  The staff returns intact for ’25 led by alum Bill O’Brien in his second season.   A control the LOS offense and defense that’s generally well prepared albeit vanilla on both sides of the ball

Biggest Weakness:   The DL is the biggest question mark.  If they can’t stop the run, it will be a long season.   

Overall - This appears to be a bottom half of the ACC team.   Questions at QB and along both lines persist and they aren’t loaded with a lot of NFL level talent.   If they can establish the run and stop the run, they will be a team no one will want to play.   Cal gets them on on the road, making this at best a toss up game

Duke:

Vs 2024 - Maintain the course which was a very successful 9 win season.   They have a veteran defense and improved (at least on paper) at QB

Offseason:  Not bad.  They were hit hard by graduation at LB and WR, however they were a net winner in the portal

Offense - Relative to the competition they played in 2024, this was not a particularly good offense.  They lose their top WRs and top RB though they return four starters including an All ACC performer on the OL.  Darian Mensah coming in as the QB feels like a win.  This group should be solid via the OL and Mensah’s legs.

Defense - This is a very well coached and veteran unit that was only a notch below the Bears in 2024.  They should be improved with good depth and production on the DL and two NFL players in the secondary.  Not a ton of elite athletes outside the aforementioned defensive backs so the ceiling may not be super high

Coaching:     Manny Diaz did a really nice job in 2024 and his staff returns mostly intact.  They will be smart, disciplined and tough.   They have a similar style to Cal in the reliance on defense and relative conservatism on offense

Biggest Weakness:    The lack of raw talent.  This isn’t a particularly big or fast team.  Their OL can pass protect but doesn’t create many run lanes.   

Overall - This team looks better than the ‘24 version, however when the schedules are factored in, they may not win as many games.   They come to Berkeley in the 2nd of back to back road games and that is likely the difference in the matchup.   

 

Discussion from...

A look at Cal's 2025 Opponents - 1st Half of the Schedule

1,936 Views | 6 Replies | Last: 16 hrs ago by BearSD
Rushinbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The attitude of the team toward football will tell the tale of this season. If, as has been suggested, the O coaches teach a "them or us" mentality and the O buys into it, esp the OL, then we will do well. If the O retains "its just a game" mentality, we will not. In that regard, it may be a good thing that so many left.

On D, the proof will be in the DBs. They'll need talent to mesh wholesale in so short a period. It looks like the talent is adequate. The rest of the D looks good (ps will Burrell play this year? It was said that he was injured in the spring?).

I'm still at 8-4. UL, SMU favored. OSU, MN, Duke, VT toss up. The rest Cal favored.
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd argue that on D, it's the pass rush that's critical because even great DBs can't defend a receiver forever. Yes, Cal has sent Safeties to the NFL the last few years, but Wilcox's best defense (2018, 2019?) included a strong pass rush. Along those lines, I'd sure like to see some stunts with the interior linemen. Whether it was Sirmon's or Wilcox's call, Cal seldom did this, yet it was effective, particularly when David Reese was in the game.
Rushinbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HearstMining said:

I'd argue that on D, it's the pass rush that's critical because even great DBs can't defend a receiver forever. Yes, Cal has sent Safeties to the NFL the last few years, but Wilcox's best defense (2018, 2019?) included a strong pass rush. Along those lines, I'd sure like to see some stunts with the interior linemen. Whether it was Sirmon's or Wilcox's call, Cal seldom did this, yet it was effective, particularly when David Reese was in the game.

We'll see how inventive the new guy gets. Or, JW may be insisting that they stay plain vanilla. Would the new guy override that? Be interesting if he did.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HearstMining said:

I'd argue that on D, it's the pass rush that's critical because even great DBs can't defend a receiver forever. Yes, Cal has sent Safeties to the NFL the last few years, but Wilcox's best defense (2018, 2019?) included a strong pass rush. Along those lines, I'd sure like to see some stunts with the interior linemen. Whether it was Sirmon's or Wilcox's call, Cal seldom did this, yet it was effective, particularly when David Reese was in the game.


Wilcox's best defense was year 2, 2018 when he had the #22 defense in the country. The players were inherited from Wilcox/Kaufman. As far as the pass rush, the keys were 1) we had good DL, largely due to the recruiting of Fred Tate on the previous staff (great DL are recruited) and 2) Tim DeRuyter's schemes and play calling. Browning's recruiting and Sirmon's schemes were not close. Our recruiting may have improved with others helping out and we will see what our defense looks like with Sirmon gone.
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rushinbear said:

The attitude of the team toward football will tell the tale of this season. If, as has been suggested, the O coaches teach a "them or us" mentality and the O buys into it, esp the OL, then we will do well. If the O retains "its just a game" mentality, we will not. In that regard, it may be a good thing that so many left.

On D, the proof will be in the DBs. They'll need talent to mesh wholesale in so short a period. It looks like the talent is adequate. The rest of the D looks good (ps will Burrell play this year? It was said that he was injured in the spring?).

I'm still at 8-4. UL, SMU favored. OSU, MN, Duke, VT toss up. The rest Cal favored.

Burrell very likely out for the season I see 7-5: Losses Minn, Va Tech, UL, BC (they have a bye before Cal and it's a long road trip vs a well coached team) and to SMU. And this assumes tough wins vs OSU (improved with a solid transfer QB in a tough road environment), and Cal sweeping Duke/NC at home (could be a split) plus a Big Game win (should be a win - but as last year proved, its often a coin flip given the emotions of the game and large crowd).

thus 8-4 or better is not likely if objectively looking at the teams/location to be played etc. Certainly hope I am wrong! Note Vegas has the Cal season win total at 5.5 wins.

So many variables - with huge question marks for a complete new RB group, a better OL (but by how much?), QB talent for sure - but Mendoza at this stage/stability would have had the edge (but completely fine with him gone given how his departure played out) but both key QB players are lacking D1 experience and thus have much to prove, and lastly, a relatively thin secondary group that is talented but not proven.

I do believe Rivera/Rolovitch will provide valuable input and prove to have a very positive impact on the coaching decisions. Will be fun and very interesting to see how the season plays out and I personally went heavy on the season win total - over: )
BearSD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm also thinking 7-5. There is a lot of variance in college football, so maybe our Bears win one of the games in which they are underdogs and lose one in which they are favored, and it balances out.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.