Cal Strong! said:For whatever it worth, of the three leadership teams that were talking to Cal Strong about coming onboard . . . Knowlton and his team were the least interested (followed by Moguluf). Knowlton seems very confident that he knows what he doing and needs no assistance.Econ141 said:
Why is Knowlton not fired yet?
What do you see? You see, Failed Leadership.
The Chancellor's team was most receptive.
So if one hates Cal Strong . . . then one probably also trusts Knowlton's judgement
Strangely, the AD's team and Moguluf teams are the ones who are most likely to blame Cal professors, Cal alumni, and Berkeley coaches for the failures of the athletic department. They won't accept outside help because they are hyper-confident they have all the answers. Yet they are simultaneously certain that the decks are so stacked against them that they might fail (through no fault of their own, of course).
Cal Strong's position is that this crisis isn't just manageable, but that it is winnable . . . if we stop making excuses and start making strong decisions immediately (not weeks or months from now).
This sounds toxic ... It would be manageable and winnable if there was different leadership. My gosh the admin is going to bring us down all the way to the very end and it never had to even come close. Do you feel you, it any big donors, have any influence/voice in this? I need some hope.


