I stated "anywhere between 3-9 and 9-3", so on average, I got it right.
Bobodeluxe said:
I stated "anywhere between 3-9 and 9-3", so on average, I got it right.
Bobodeluxe said:
I stated "anywhere between 3-9 and 9-3", so on average, I got it right.
BearoutEast67 said:
Bears were predicted to end up 9th or 10th right, and they ended up 7th. Like the Jeffersons, they're moving on up!
What proof do we have that Shocky1 attended any games?Shocky1 said:
my prediction wuz that bobo, doubtful & blueblood wouldn't go to a single cal football game in person this season but continue to pontificate in their predictablely negative whiny azz voices
Blueblood said:What proof do we have that Shocky1 attended any games?Shocky1 said:
my prediction wuz that bobo, doubtful & blueblood wouldn't go to a single cal football game in person this season but continue to pontificate in their predictablely negative whiny azz voices
I don't see the relevance in doing so which makes me wonder if Shocky1 has heard of TV?
Cal88 said:
^ We have been playing at the level of a top 25 the last 3 games. UCLA came into this game at #27 Sagarin, and WSU gave UW all it can handle yesterday.
The Pac was crazy good this year, that and the fact that we have had to break in a new freshman QB means we are better than our record.
ninetyfourbear said:
I predicted 3 or 4 wins. I was wrong about the WSU and UCLA games. I expected a dumb loss to a team we should have beat but I was expecting that to be Stanford or ASU, not Auburn.
upsetof86 said:Cal88 said:
^ We have been playing at the level of a top 25 the last 3 games. UCLA came into this game at #27 Sagarin, and WSU gave UW all it can handle yesterday.
The Pac was crazy good this year, that and the fact that we have had to break in a new freshman QB means we are better than our record.
Whoa there, UCLA was the only team we beat with a winning record, a record padded by 2 FCS wins and a win against 4-8 San Diego State. And we played the Bruins in an inconsequential game for them after they defeated their rival SC handily. Everyone else we beat had at best 5-7 records. We also lost to 6-6 Auburn. So top 25 caliber? No. Am I happy we are going bowling? Heck yeah the rules apply to everyone, get to 6 you qualify.
udaman1 said:
way too early.Cal v Texas Tech preview: anyone have some thoughts?
In terms of quality of opponent, I'm GUESSING TT is somewhere between Wazzu and UCLA. A very winnable game for the Bears. Shreveport is a haul from Lubbock too. I dont think their fans fill the stadium.
Shocky1 said:
my prediction wuz that bobo, doubtful & blueblood wouldn't go to a single cal football game in person this season but continue to pontificate in their predictablely negative whiny azz voices
Bold prediction. Congrats!Bobodeluxe said:
I stated "anywhere between 3-9 and 9-3", so on average, I got it right.
chazzed said:Shocky1 said:
my prediction wuz that bobo, doubtful & blueblood wouldn't go to a single cal football game in person this season but continue to pontificate in their predictablely negative whiny azz voices
Which trolls are worse: tools such as ducktildeath or trolls from within like bobodeluxe and blueblood?
JRL.02 said:
Now, let's put in our way too early 2024 record predictions
UC Davis
@ Auburn (6-6)
San Diego State (4-8)
Miami (7-5)
NC State (#21, 9-3)
Stanford (3-9)
Syracuse (6-6)
@ Florida State (#4, 12-0)
@ Pitt (3-9)
@ SMU (#25, 10-2)
@ Wake Forest (4-8)