blungld said:
I think there is a chance that was designed...?
So glad we finally threw into the endzone...but to our shortest WR on a fade?
TV confirmed it was not by design
blungld said:
I think there is a chance that was designed...?
So glad we finally threw into the endzone...but to our shortest WR on a fade?
We are in Non-Conference, so they can be fair now.Cal88 said:
ACC review booth owes us big time.
Cal88 said:
ACC review booth owes us big time.
TouchedTheAxeIn82 said:
Attendance is bad but probably looks even worse on TV.
Nope, still getting screwedcalumnus said:Cal88 said:
ACC review booth owes us big time.
It will not be payback, it will be supporting an ACC team over a PAC-2 team.
The losing makes the commercials worse.MinotStateBeav said:
Is it me or have commercials gotten more obnoxious than before?
TypiCALCal88 said:
Dumb call, go for the block, and save the lateral for a deeper kick.
Wilcox received a telegram about this idea earlier in the week.KenBurnski said:
Throwing into the endzone is wild
He took a hard look at the program, consulted with experts, examined all aspects of the team, and decided that they should try and score TDs.golden sloth said:Wilcox received a telegram about this idea earlier in the week.KenBurnski said:
Throwing into the endzone is wild
golden sloth said:
Typical red zone pre-snap penalty.
I wish the recruits didn't have to see the stands.TouchedTheAxeIn82 said:
The two TDs happened right in front of the recruits. They are sitting right behind the wall in the southwest corner.
The problem hasn't been Nando.VolunteerReverie said:
That was a laser beam. Good throw, Mendoza.