Alberto Mendoza speaks

17,755 Views | 121 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by philly1121
CNHTH
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yikes. Toxxxxxxxxxic environment much?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CNHTH said:

Yikes. Toxxxxxxxxxic environment much?



Just another thing for the naive to validate in their mind that the sky is falling.

Wilcox and Bloesch helped turn a 2* into a 4*. They did him well.
Son-of-California
How long do you want to ignore this user?
$2mm payday. Hoosier daddy.
annarborbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fernando may still get another better offer. In which case, he will then give the same inspiring good-bye speech at Indiana.
BearoutEast67
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annarborbear said:

Fernando may still get another better offer. In which case, he will then give the same inspiring good-bye speech at Indiana.
Maybe I'll frame my "98 yards with my boys" t-shirt (still in the mail) for my office both as a memento for a great moment in Cal history and as a warning toward keeping sober expectations.
Donate to Cal's NIL at https://calegends.com/donation/
DaveT
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a mess. Unfair to Fernando, unfair to Chandler, stupid of Bloesch, stupid of Wilcox . . . . This was pretty widely rumored for a while (and makes perfect sense looking back on summer ball), but just shows how bad Wilcox is at his job. Why is your OC promising a starting role to a transfer QB? Did you not realize this, or did you think it was ok? Either way it's nuts.
concernedparent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

CNHTH said:

Yikes. Toxxxxxxxxxic environment much?



Just another thing for the naive to validate in their mind that the sky is falling.

Wilcox and Bloesch helped turn a 2* into a 4*. They did him well.
Everyone should find someone who has as much faith in them as you do in this coaching staff.

They can't evaluate QB talent for ***** They only gave Mendoza a chance after all their coveted transfers flamed out. Then this year they continually tried to make Rogers work when it was obvious he couldn't hack it.
sonofabear51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not just Wilcox, the whole God!@#$%^ Athletic Department from the top down. They ALL suck!
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concernedparent said:

oski003 said:

CNHTH said:

Yikes. Toxxxxxxxxxic environment much?



Just another thing for the naive to validate in their mind that the sky is falling.

Wilcox and Bloesch helped turn a 2* into a 4*. They did him well.
Everyone should find someone who has as much faith in them as you do in this coaching staff.

They can't evaluate QB talent for ***** They only gave Mendoza a chance after all their coveted transfers flamed out. Then this year they continually tried to make Rogers work when it was obvious he couldn't hack it.


Making him compete for the starting job is not a negative. Starting Rogers over Mendoza would be and that certainly didn't happen. The coaches did well here.
bencgilmore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DaveT said:

What a mess. Unfair to Fernando, unfair to Chandler, stupid of Bloesch, stupid of Wilcox . . . . This was pretty widely rumored for a while (and makes perfect sense looking back on summer ball), but just shows how bad Wilcox is at his job. Why is your OC promising a starting role to a transfer QB? Did you not realize this, or did you think it was ok? Either way it's nuts.
the whole Mendoza/Chandler/JKS situation has been managed... "poorly" doesn't do it justice. None of this needed to be complicated in any way or adversarial to these extents. Just unbelievably bad peple management

Wilcox better hope Harsin pulls 40 ppg out of his ass, because i've given wilcox more leeway than nearly anyone on this board.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bencgilmore said:

DaveT said:

What a mess. Unfair to Fernando, unfair to Chandler, stupid of Bloesch, stupid of Wilcox . . . . This was pretty widely rumored for a while (and makes perfect sense looking back on summer ball), but just shows how bad Wilcox is at his job. Why is your OC promising a starting role to a transfer QB? Did you not realize this, or did you think it was ok? Either way it's nuts.
the whole Mendoza/Chandler/JKS situation has been managed... "poorly" doesn't do it justice. None of this needed to be complicated in any way or adversarial to these extents. Just unbelievably bad peple management

Wilcox better hope Harsin pulls 40 ppg out of his ass, because i've given wilcox more leeway than nearly anyone on this board.


The Rogers/Mendoza situation was managed well enough to turn a 2* unwanted QB into a 4* QB being offered millions of dollars to play college football.
HungryCalBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Even the year before that, how the coaches started Jackson and Finley before settling with Mendoza puzzled me.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HungryCalBear said:

Even the year before that, how the coaches started Jackson and Finley before settling with Mendoza puzzled me.


And there are very vocal posters on this board who heavily criticized Wilcox for playing Nando over Jackson.
Pittstop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concernedparent said:

oski003 said:

CNHTH said:

Yikes. Toxxxxxxxxxic environment much?



Just another thing for the naive to validate in their mind that the sky is falling.

Wilcox and Bloesch helped turn a 2* into a 4*. They did him well.
Everyone should find someone who has as much faith in them as you do in this coaching staff.

They can't evaluate QB talent for ***** They only gave Mendoza a chance after all their coveted transfers flamed out. Then this year they continually tried to make Rogers work when it was obvious he couldn't hack it.


Come on, man. 'Both sides' are being extreme. Bone headed to "promise" 'anything' by Bloesch, if true. But Cal obviously did a good job "evaluating" 2-star QB Fernando, and were his only P4 offer - he was committed to Yale, for Chrissakes, with no other viable options at the time. Cal "evaluated" him after a recommendation from one of Musgrave's friends, and gave him a P4 scholly - took a flyer on him, so to speak - and ultimately 'developed him' into a starting P4 QB by his (RS) Sophomore season. And as a result Cal has helped him become a now-4-star, in-demand Portal QB. Competition - with Chandler Rogers, or anyone else - is not a bad thing. Forcing your QB to "win" the job...to "beat out" the competition, is the point, isn't it? Why tf should he be whining about having to f'n 'compete'?
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sonofabear51 said:

Not just Wilcox, the whole God!@#$%^ Athletic Department from the top down. They ALL suck!
oh? alrighty then, buh bye
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
DoubtfulBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

bencgilmore said:

DaveT said:

What a mess. Unfair to Fernando, unfair to Chandler, stupid of Bloesch, stupid of Wilcox . . . . This was pretty widely rumored for a while (and makes perfect sense looking back on summer ball), but just shows how bad Wilcox is at his job. Why is your OC promising a starting role to a transfer QB? Did you not realize this, or did you think it was ok? Either way it's nuts.
the whole Mendoza/Chandler/JKS situation has been managed... "poorly" doesn't do it justice. None of this needed to be complicated in any way or adversarial to these extents. Just unbelievably bad peple management

Wilcox better hope Harsin pulls 40 ppg out of his ass, because i've given wilcox more leeway than nearly anyone on this board.


The Rogers/Mendoza situation was managed well enough to turn a 2* unwanted QB into a 4* QB being offered millions of dollars to play college football.
Mendoza became a 4* in spite of Wilcox and Bloesch. If he were on a decent program, he may even be a Heisman dark horse
Fire Starkey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
everyone is assuming that Alberto is speaking the truth. Maybe he is, I dunno. But maybe not. Doesn't hurt the Mendoza narrative if big bro "wasn't believed in"
concernedparent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pittstop said:

concernedparent said:

oski003 said:

CNHTH said:

Yikes. Toxxxxxxxxxic environment much?



Just another thing for the naive to validate in their mind that the sky is falling.

Wilcox and Bloesch helped turn a 2* into a 4*. They did him well.
Everyone should find someone who has as much faith in them as you do in this coaching staff.

They can't evaluate QB talent for ***** They only gave Mendoza a chance after all their coveted transfers flamed out. Then this year they continually tried to make Rogers work when it was obvious he couldn't hack it.


Come on, man. 'Both sides' are being extreme. Bone headed to "promise" 'anything' by Bloesch, if true. But Cal obviously did a good job "evaluating" 2-star QB Fernando, and were his only P4 offer - he was committed to Yale, for Chrissakes, with no other viable options at the time. Cal "evaluated" him after a recommendation from one of Musgrave's friends, and gave him a P4 scholly - took a flyer on him, so to speak - and ultimately 'developed him' into a starting P4 QB by his (RS) Sophomore season. Andas a result Cal has helped him become a 4-star, in-demand Portal QB. Competition - with Chandler Rogers, or anyone else - is not a bad thing. Forcing your QB to "win" the job...to "beat out" the competition, is the point, isn't it? *** should he be whining about having to f'n 'compete'?
Evaluating him as a prospect? Sure. Musgrave did a nice job scouting and signing Fernando. Then when he got to campus, he sat behind two of the worst QB "starters" (not starting because of injury) I've seen at Cal. As soon as he got significant playing time against Oregon State, all of us here quickly realized how much better he was than the other guys and questioned why he wasn't getting more of a look.

Competition is great. I'm glad they brought in Rogers and thought on-paper before the season he could potentially win the job. I'm talking about the fact the staff couldn't see that Chandler Rogers was not working out in practice and gave him snaps late into fall camp and in-game that he did not deserve. Competition shouldn't mean artificially elevating a lesser player because of stubbornness (or as is insinuated, some backroom deal).
Cal8285
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't buy it, it makes no sense.

Did Rogers claim that he was promised the starting job? Maybe, or maybe Mendoza heard that from someone other than the OC. But if Rogers was promised the starting job, why didn't he start against Davis?

More likely, Rogers was promised that he would be able to compete for the starting job. Maybe even Mendoza was told that Rogers was going to be able to compete for the starting job. Maybe Mendoza wouldn't (or didn't) like that. Highly unlikely Mendoza was told that Rogers was promised the starting job, unless he was told by Rogers, which Mendoza shouldn't have believed.

If Rogers had started the Davis game, then maybe I'd believe the coaches were idiotic enough to promise him the starting job. But that didn't happen.

Alberto Mendoza certainly didn't get this first hand from the OC, even if he sincerely believes it, and maybe the message got modified in the retelling before it got to Alberto. The likelihood of it being true is pretty slim. Bloesch is gone, so it doesn't matter that much (although if it were true, the buck still stops with Wilcox), but it just doesn't ring true with Mendoza having gotten the first snaps against Davis.
91Cal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fire Starkey said:

everyone is assuming that Alberto is speaking the truth. Maybe he is, I dunno. But maybe not. Doesn't hurt the Mendoza narrative if big bro "wasn't believed in"

Would he have worked as hard if he was anointed QB1? Another question that we will never know the answer to…
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was looking up Bloesch's QB experience (boy is it weak...one year, playing or coaching) and then found out Sterlin Gilbert is the QB/passing game coordinator. He seems to have a better resume to do what Bloesch just did. And we could have kept Bloesch at OL coach only. Why was Bloesch making promises on the QB position? It's an interesting position Bloesch is in relative to Gilbert and the new OC Harsin. Do we basically demote Bloesch and pay him less? Do we still need Gilbert. It just seems weird to me.
concernedparent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DoubtfulBear said:

oski003 said:

bencgilmore said:

DaveT said:

What a mess. Unfair to Fernando, unfair to Chandler, stupid of Bloesch, stupid of Wilcox . . . . This was pretty widely rumored for a while (and makes perfect sense looking back on summer ball), but just shows how bad Wilcox is at his job. Why is your OC promising a starting role to a transfer QB? Did you not realize this, or did you think it was ok? Either way it's nuts.
the whole Mendoza/Chandler/JKS situation has been managed... "poorly" doesn't do it justice. None of this needed to be complicated in any way or adversarial to these extents. Just unbelievably bad peple management

Wilcox better hope Harsin pulls 40 ppg out of his ass, because i've given wilcox more leeway than nearly anyone on this board.


The Rogers/Mendoza situation was managed well enough to turn a 2* unwanted QB into a 4* QB being offered millions of dollars to play college football.
Mendoza became a 4* in spite of Wilcox and Bloesch.
I don't understand the idea that the staff truly "developed" Mendoza. He was scout team his first year and was getting third team snaps his second year. If anyone's played competitive sports you know how much less attention and snaps you get on those teams. This is not like Tony Franklin/Dykes and Goff situation where they handpicked someone they (rightly) thought had potential and invested critical first team snaps on.
Pittstop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concernedparent said:

Pittstop said:

concernedparent said:

oski003 said:

CNHTH said:

Yikes. Toxxxxxxxxxic environment much?



Just another thing for the naive to validate in their mind that the sky is falling.

Wilcox and Bloesch helped turn a 2* into a 4*. They did him well.
Everyone should find someone who has as much faith in them as you do in this coaching staff.

They can't evaluate QB talent for ***** They only gave Mendoza a chance after all their coveted transfers flamed out. Then this year they continually tried to make Rogers work when it was obvious he couldn't hack it.


Come on, man. 'Both sides' are being extreme. Bone headed to "promise" 'anything' by Bloesch, if true. But Cal obviously did a good job "evaluating" 2-star QB Fernando, and were his only P4 offer - he was committed to Yale, for Chrissakes, with no other viable options at the time. Cal "evaluated" him after a recommendation from one of Musgrave's friends, and gave him a P4 scholly - took a flyer on him, so to speak - and ultimately 'developed him' into a starting P4 QB by his (RS) Sophomore season. Andas a result Cal has helped him become a 4-star, in-demand Portal QB. Competition - with Chandler Rogers, or anyone else - is not a bad thing. Forcing your QB to "win" the job...to "beat out" the competition, is the point, isn't it? *** should he be whining about having to f'n 'compete'?
Evaluating him as a prospect? Sure. Musgrave did a nice job scouting and signing Fernando. Then when he got to campus, he sat behind two of the worst QB "starters" (not starting because of injury) I've seen at Cal. As soon as he got significant playing time against Oregon State, all of us here quickly realized how much better he was than the other guys and questioned why he wasn't getting more of a look.

Competition is great. I'm glad they brought in Rogers and thought on-paper before the season he could potentially win the job. I'm talking about the fact the staff couldn't see that Chandler Rogers was not working out in practice and gave him snaps late into fall camp and in-game that he did not deserve. Competition shouldn't mean artificially elevating a lesser player because of stubbornness (or as is insinuated, some backroom deal).


Come on. Mendoza 'won' the job. Had to make him 'compete' to sharpen his focus, bear down every day, every practice, and bring out his best. All the time. He 'won' the QB1 job outright by the latter half of his (RS) Freshman season. What are you whinging about?
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pittstop said:

concernedparent said:

oski003 said:

CNHTH said:

Yikes. Toxxxxxxxxxic environment much?



Just another thing for the naive to validate in their mind that the sky is falling.

Wilcox and Bloesch helped turn a 2* into a 4*. They did him well.
Everyone should find someone who has as much faith in them as you do in this coaching staff.

They can't evaluate QB talent for ***** They only gave Mendoza a chance after all their coveted transfers flamed out. Then this year they continually tried to make Rogers work when it was obvious he couldn't hack it.


Come on, man. 'Both sides' are being extreme. Bone headed to "promise" 'anything' by Bloesch, if true. But Cal obviously did a good job "evaluating" 2-star QB Fernando, and were his only P4 offer - he was committed to Yale, for Chrissakes, with no other viable options at the time. Cal "evaluated" him after a recommendation from one of Musgrave's friends, and gave him a P4 scholly - took a flyer on him, so to speak - and ultimately 'developed him' into a starting P4 QB by his (RS) Sophomore season. And as a result Cal has helped him become a now-4-star, in-demand Portal QB. Competition - with Chandler Rogers, or anyone else - is not a bad thing. Forcing your QB to "win" the job...to "beat out" the competition, is the point, isn't it? *** should he be whining about having to f'n 'compete'?
It certainly isn't a bad thing....unless you're Cal, and said qb that you developed into a 4-star leaves for the portal.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal8285 said:

I don't buy it, it makes no sense.

Did Rogers claim that he was promised the starting job? Maybe, or maybe Mendoza heard that from someone other than the OC. But if Rogers was promised the starting job, why didn't he start against Davis?

More likely, Rogers was promised that he would be able to compete for the starting job. Maybe even Mendoza was told that Rogers was going to be able to compete for the starting job. Maybe Mendoza wouldn't (or didn't) like that. Highly unlikely Mendoza was told that Rogers was promised the starting job, unless he was told by Rogers, which Mendoza shouldn't have believed.

If Rogers had started the Davis game, then maybe I'd believe the coaches were idiotic enough to promise him the starting job. But that didn't happen.

Alberto Mendoza certainly didn't get this first hand from the OC, even if he sincerely believes it, and maybe the message got modified in the retelling before it got to Alberto. The likelihood of it being true is pretty slim. Bloesch is gone, so it doesn't matter that much (although if it were true, the buck still stops with Wilcox), but it just doesn't ring true with Mendoza having gotten the first snaps against Davis.

I'm 99% sure it was like this. (^)

""Chandler, we'll give you an equal chance to win the job in Spring Practice and Fall Camp and, either way, you will play in the earlier games."

Rogers had a good enough year in 2023 where he was only going to go somewhere where he had a promise to be able to compete for the starting position.

Nobody -- well, hardly anybody -- has the coaches guarantee them a starting spot. If Mendoza had a problem with that, he needed to get real. He won the job and he played the vast majority of downs. (Well, not against SMU, lol.) Treated fairly.
JimSox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HungryCalBear said:

Even the year before that, how the coaches started Jackson and Finley before settling with Mendoza puzzled me.


And it was obvious from the moment he came into his first game that he brought new excitement and energy to the offense. Whether he had the skill remained to be determined.
And whether Rogers was promised the job or not, it's clear now that Nando thought so. Having competition should have been ok with him. But I can see that believing he had to overcome second string status during fall camp to win his job back could have pissed him off. And yet this story does not jibe with his tearful "Cal Bears forever" interview. So I don't know.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DoubtfulBear said:

oski003 said:

bencgilmore said:

DaveT said:

What a mess. Unfair to Fernando, unfair to Chandler, stupid of Bloesch, stupid of Wilcox . . . . This was pretty widely rumored for a while (and makes perfect sense looking back on summer ball), but just shows how bad Wilcox is at his job. Why is your OC promising a starting role to a transfer QB? Did you not realize this, or did you think it was ok? Either way it's nuts.
the whole Mendoza/Chandler/JKS situation has been managed... "poorly" doesn't do it justice. None of this needed to be complicated in any way or adversarial to these extents. Just unbelievably bad peple management

Wilcox better hope Harsin pulls 40 ppg out of his ass, because i've given wilcox more leeway than nearly anyone on this board.


The Rogers/Mendoza situation was managed well enough to turn a 2* unwanted QB into a 4* QB being offered millions of dollars to play college football.
Mendoza became a 4* in spite of Wilcox and Bloesch. If he were on a decent program, he may even be a Heisman dark horse


You are certainly funny.
Bearly Clad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Honestly of the many, many failings of this coaching staff I don't think this is one. First off, I think the promise was more that they'd give Rodgers first crack at the starting job and not an outright promise he would start. It makes sense considering that Fernando had a good, not great, first season with (if I remember right) 16 TDs and 9 INTs. They also gave them even reps in spring and summer practices until Fernando outperformed him and took the job for the entire season. Second, when you have a highly-touted incomer compared to an underwhelming known quantity of course you're going to give them the first look to see what you have. But the fact that Fernando started the back half of last year and all of this year despite having basically no offers out of high school and was set to pay to go to Yale speaks to the fact that he earned the job and that the coaching staff didn't put unnecessary obstacles in his way.

I'll denigrate this coaching staff for lots of reasons but this seems like a non-issue. In a season where he was the starter for the entire slate he wasn't guaranteed the job and it's somehow unfair to him? Let's be honest, he was the entrenched starter but not unusurpable; he was given an even shake and he won the job. If that's where we did him wrong coming off a good, not great, first season then I can live with that. It's the other issues with our program, staff, and on-field product that should have pushed him away
DaveT
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

Cal8285 said:

I don't buy it, it makes no sense.

Did Rogers claim that he was promised the starting job? Maybe, or maybe Mendoza heard that from someone other than the OC. But if Rogers was promised the starting job, why didn't he start against Davis?

More likely, Rogers was promised that he would be able to compete for the starting job. Maybe even Mendoza was told that Rogers was going to be able to compete for the starting job. Maybe Mendoza wouldn't (or didn't) like that. Highly unlikely Mendoza was told that Rogers was promised the starting job, unless he was told by Rogers, which Mendoza shouldn't have believed.

If Rogers had started the Davis game, then maybe I'd believe the coaches were idiotic enough to promise him the starting job. But that didn't happen.

Alberto Mendoza certainly didn't get this first hand from the OC, even if he sincerely believes it, and maybe the message got modified in the retelling before it got to Alberto. The likelihood of it being true is pretty slim. Bloesch is gone, so it doesn't matter that much (although if it were true, the buck still stops with Wilcox), but it just doesn't ring true with Mendoza having gotten the first snaps against Davis.

I'm 99% sure it was like this. (^)

""Chandler, we'll give you an equal chance to win the job in Spring Practice and Fall Camp and, either way, you will play in the earlier games."

Rogers had a good enough year in 2023 where he was only going to go somewhere where he had a promise to be able to compete for the starting position.

Nobody -- well, hardly anybody -- has the coaches guarantee them a starting spot. If Mendoza had a problem with that, he needed to get real. He won the job and he played the vast majority of downs. (Well, not against SMU, lol.) Treated fairly.
Based on what? Because it is being reported differently by multiple sources on X that appear to have some connection to the situation.

They are all saying Chandler was promised the starting job, not that he was offered a "equal chance to win the job in Spring Practice and Fall Camp." If that were the case, nobody would care.

Why is it so hard to believe Bloesch wanted Rogers to run his offense, told him he'd be the QB1 to get him to Cal, Rogers got pissed when it didn't happen and told someone, and it got back to Mendoza? That seems a lot more likely than this game of telephone people are hypothesizing.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DaveT said:

Big C said:

Cal8285 said:

I don't buy it, it makes no sense.

Did Rogers claim that he was promised the starting job? Maybe, or maybe Mendoza heard that from someone other than the OC. But if Rogers was promised the starting job, why didn't he start against Davis?

More likely, Rogers was promised that he would be able to compete for the starting job. Maybe even Mendoza was told that Rogers was going to be able to compete for the starting job. Maybe Mendoza wouldn't (or didn't) like that. Highly unlikely Mendoza was told that Rogers was promised the starting job, unless he was told by Rogers, which Mendoza shouldn't have believed.

If Rogers had started the Davis game, then maybe I'd believe the coaches were idiotic enough to promise him the starting job. But that didn't happen.

Alberto Mendoza certainly didn't get this first hand from the OC, even if he sincerely believes it, and maybe the message got modified in the retelling before it got to Alberto. The likelihood of it being true is pretty slim. Bloesch is gone, so it doesn't matter that much (although if it were true, the buck still stops with Wilcox), but it just doesn't ring true with Mendoza having gotten the first snaps against Davis.

I'm 99% sure it was like this. (^)

""Chandler, we'll give you an equal chance to win the job in Spring Practice and Fall Camp and, either way, you will play in the earlier games."

Rogers had a good enough year in 2023 where he was only going to go somewhere where he had a promise to be able to compete for the starting position.

Nobody -- well, hardly anybody -- has the coaches guarantee them a starting spot. If Mendoza had a problem with that, he needed to get real. He won the job and he played the vast majority of downs. (Well, not against SMU, lol.) Treated fairly.
Based on what? Because it is being reported differently by multiple sources on X that appear to have some connection to the situation.

They are all saying Chandler was promised the starting job, not that he was offered a "equal chance to win the job in Spring Practice and Fall Camp." If that were the case, nobody would care.

Why is it so hard to believe Bloesch wanted Rogers to run his offense, told him he'd be the QB1 to get him to Cal, Rogers got pissed when it didn't happen and told someone, and it got back to Mendoza? That seems a lot more likely than this game of telephone people are hypothesizing.


Who started the first game of the season?

If it was Rogers, you are likely right.

If it was Mendoza, you are likely wrong.
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bearly Clad said:

Honestly of the many, many failings of this coaching staff I don't think this is one. First off, I think the promise was more that they'd give Rodgers first crack at the starting job and not an outright promise he would start. It makes sense considering that Fernando had a good, not great, first season with (if I remember right) 16 TDs and 9 INTs. They also gave them even reps in spring and summer practices until Fernando outperformed him and took the job for the entire season. Second, when you have a highly-touted incomer compared to an underwhelming known quantity of course you're going to give them the first look to see what you have. But the fact that Fernando started the back half of last year and all of this year despite having basically no offers out of high school and was set to pay to go to Yale speaks to the fact that he earned the job and that the coaching staff didn't put unnecessary obstacles in his way.

I'll denigrate this coaching staff for lots of reasons but this seems like a non-issue. In a season where he was the starter for the entire slate he wasn't guaranteed the job and it's somehow unfair to him? Let's be honest, he was the entrenched starter but not unusurpable; he was given an even shake and he won the job. If that's where we did him wrong coming off a good, not great, first season then I can live with that. It's the other issues with our program, staff, and on-field product that should have pushed him away
That's fair. I think it does ask the question tho as to why Rogers would come into games at different times and circumstances. Some, I would agree, would be to create a different look. But other times when he came into the game, they were head scratchers. There was no reason for it.

And the biggest question mark would be - why did Rogers start ahead of Mendoza against SMU? IF Mendoza was cleared to play, why didn't he start? Or did he already inform the coaches of his decision to leave?
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He was likely told he had to compete, but also that he was being brought in to be the starter. It depends on who got what in terms of NIL, I guess, but Nando had to suffer through Sam Jackson being given the nod over him, in addition to Finley, despite all 3 being unable to "separate" in camp. Why? Because those guys were getting paid. Then it happens again with Rogers. Then it's about to happen AGAIN with JKS? And they expected Nando to recruit JKS to potentially take his job. This whole process has been ridiculous. JW has no idea how much heart matters on a football field. Routinely we only get to see the guys who would die for the Bears when the guy ahead of them gets hurt. There are probably a dozen guys on the roster who should be playing and haven't even gotten a shot. It's maddening. Wilcox's personnel decisions have been abysmal. We took advantage of Nando. We took him for granted. I don't blame him one bit for burning the boats.
NVBear78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CNHTH said:

Yikes. Toxxxxxxxxxic environment much?




Couldn't see what he said?
CNHTH
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pittstop said:

concernedparent said:

oski003 said:

CNHTH said:

Yikes. Toxxxxxxxxxic environment much?



Just another thing for the naive to validate in their mind that the sky is falling.

Wilcox and Bloesch helped turn a 2* into a 4*. They did him well.
Everyone should find someone who has as much faith in them as you do in this coaching staff.

They can't evaluate QB talent for ***** They only gave Mendoza a chance after all their coveted transfers flamed out. Then this year they continually tried to make Rogers work when it was obvious he couldn't hack it.


Come on, man. 'Both sides' are being extreme. Bone headed to "promise" 'anything' by Bloesch, if true. But Cal obviously did a good job "evaluating" 2-star QB Fernando, and were his only P4 offer - he was committed to Yale, for Chrissakes, with no other viable options at the time. Cal "evaluated" him after a recommendation from one of Musgrave's friends, and gave him a P4 scholly - took a flyer on him, so to speak - and ultimately 'developed him' into a starting P4 QB by his (RS) Sophomore season. And as a result Cal has helped him become a now-4-star, in-demand Portal QB. Competition - with Chandler Rogers, or anyone else - is not a bad thing. Forcing your QB to "win" the job...to "beat out" the competition, is the point, isn't it? Why tf should he be whining about having to f'n 'compete'?

The way I understood Fernando's recruitment was that we didn't even recruit him we just sent him an offer on the advice of one of Musgrave and Wilmoe's pals after Jmart decom'd and we were sans a 22 or a 23 qb
To Musgrave's credit he did visit Miami once if I recall correctly but again that was Musgrave not Wilmoe and even then I'd call it blind luck as opposed to actually recruiting someone.
Pittstop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DaveT said:

Big C said:

Cal8285 said:

I don't buy it, it makes no sense.

Did Rogers claim that he was promised the starting job? Maybe, or maybe Mendoza heard that from someone other than the OC. But if Rogers was promised the starting job, why didn't he start against Davis?

More likely, Rogers was promised that he would be able to compete for the starting job. Maybe even Mendoza was told that Rogers was going to be able to compete for the starting job. Maybe Mendoza wouldn't (or didn't) like that. Highly unlikely Mendoza was told that Rogers was promised the starting job, unless he was told by Rogers, which Mendoza shouldn't have believed.

If Rogers had started the Davis game, then maybe I'd believe the coaches were idiotic enough to promise him the starting job. But that didn't happen.

Alberto Mendoza certainly didn't get this first hand from the OC, even if he sincerely believes it, and maybe the message got modified in the retelling before it got to Alberto. The likelihood of it being true is pretty slim. Bloesch is gone, so it doesn't matter that much (although if it were true, the buck still stops with Wilcox), but it just doesn't ring true with Mendoza having gotten the first snaps against Davis.

I'm 99% sure it was like this. (^)

""Chandler, we'll give you an equal chance to win the job in Spring Practice and Fall Camp and, either way, you will play in the earlier games."

Rogers had a good enough year in 2023 where he was only going to go somewhere where he had a promise to be able to compete for the starting position.

Nobody -- well, hardly anybody -- has the coaches guarantee them a starting spot. If Mendoza had a problem with that, he needed to get real. He won the job and he played the vast majority of downs. (Well, not against SMU, lol.) Treated fairly.
Based on what? Because it is being reported differently by multiple sources on X that appear to have some connection to the situation.

They are all saying Chandler was promised the starting job, not that he was offered a "equal chance to win the job in Spring Practice and Fall Camp." If that were the case, nobody would care.

Why is it so hard to believe Bloesch wanted Rogers to run his offense, told him he'd be the QB1 to get him to Cal, Rogers got pissed when it didn't happen and told someone, and it got back to Mendoza? That seems a lot more likely than this game of telephone people are hypothesizing.


Aside from the fact that it is almost certain that Fernando never, personally, heard the words "The QB1 job has been promised to Sam" come out of Bloesch's, or any other 'coach's' mouth (so he'd have had to have heard such a thing second hand, or worse). I once took a training at work where the training facilitator did a communications experiment by whispering some information (I forget exactly what it was) into the ear of a person in the front row of the class group, and told her to repeat the message to the person next to her, and so on until it reached the last person in the group (there were about 15 of us). He then asked the last person to repeat the message to the group out loud. He then asked the first person to repeat what she had been told. The information repeated out loud had been completely changed during the passing from one person to another, and was completely different from what the first person had been told, to what the last person said out loud. So, imagine a lie, or even an embellished or exaggerated story being spread on social media. 'Lies' - or even 'conspiracy theories ' - will spread faster than the truth.
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.