Freshman QBs and 1st Year Impact

8,018 Views | 91 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by HearstMining
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strykur said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

8-4 would be the worst result because that is no man's land in regards to results and trajectory of the program, 9-3 means we won at least a game against one of the better opponents on the schedule and are on the fringes of playoff contention, 7-5 at least gives us enough to change things but since 8-4 does not and is not a big upward move, puts us nowhere.


Agree, but my fear is that even 7-5 would put us in "no man's land" as far as the University is concerned, as it could interpreted as the program trending in the right direction.

2022: 4-8
2023: 6-6
2024: 6-6
2025: 7-5

And he will still have 2 years left on his contract at 5 million per.

Hopefully, this is where RR and a few major donors would step in. And Chancellor Lyons would understand.
Pittstop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

I agree retaining Wilcox was a mistake. But I am pretty strongly convinced he will be not be the HC in 2026. When Rivera was actually put in charge it was really late in the game to change the HC. So for now he evaluates Wilcox and the staff. Observes the college football landscape which is different than the NFL. And fundraises to set up the next HC with a chance to win.

Rivera has a big job putting into place everything else that a strong football program needs to win. That is a big job here. For now we have to trust Rivera and Lyons that they know what needs to be done. And that it does not include Wilcox beyond this season.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

I believe the Cal HC job could be attractive if the other pieces are in place. One good season does not make you a strong program. You need to have the pieces in place to do that annually. People fear that removing Wilcox after a good season would hurt their prospects for attracting a strong HC. I disagree with that. Good coaches want a chance to win. If under Rivera/Lyons the program has the structure in place to win they can attract a good coach to lead the team. Good coaches know what that looks like.

But yes time is running out. We can only hope there is enough time to change the narrative around Cal football.


My belief is that RR is going about things the right way. I don't think he would assume a position like FB GM and just start indiscriminately taking a meat ax to the on-field product. I think he has gone about it appropriately by eliminating 'infrastructure inefficiencies' (like Bloesch, Gilbert, AT, & Burl, on O, and 'moving on from Sirmon - regardless of how it was framed - and Tre Brown on D) and building out that part of the infrastructure with quality, proven coaches and leaders; investing in recruiting staff and enhancing the recruiting operation and implementing an actual recruiting plan/approach/model; eliminating any program confusion, ambiguity, and apathy/absence of commitment related to leadership and who is driving the car; being in charge of identifying (with appropriate input from coaches and recruiting leadership) where NIL/Revenue Share dollars should best be allocated. And now that all of the broad infrastructure is 'mostly' in place - and no viable, or lack-of-institutional-support excuses remain - RR has time during his 1st season as FB GM to thoroughly evaluate and consider "JW replacement options" and avoid the knee-jerk, unprepared, willy-nilly emergency [interim] HC appointment we witnessed take place down on The Farm. When he replaces the HC it will be done "the right way", like the professional that he is.
Rushinbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strykur said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

8-4 would be the worst result because that is no man's land in regards to results and trajectory of the program, 9-3 means we won at least a game against one of the better opponents on the schedule and are on the fringes of playoff contention, 7-5 at least gives us enough to change things but since 8-4 does not and is not a big upward move, puts us nowhere.

therefore, that is the result we will get. we're Cal, after all.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

Strykur said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

8-4 would be the worst result because that is no man's land in regards to results and trajectory of the program, 9-3 means we won at least a game against one of the better opponents on the schedule and are on the fringes of playoff contention, 7-5 at least gives us enough to change things but since 8-4 does not and is not a big upward move, puts us nowhere.

Agree, but my fear is that even 7-5 would put us in "no man's land" as far as the University is concerned, as it could interpreted as the program trending in the right direction.

And he will still have 2 years left on his contract at 5 million per.

Hopefully, this is where RR and a few major donors would step in. And Chancellor Lyons would understand.

If there are no changes before 2026 and we go backwards that leaves no time for a rebuild before the next turning (2029-2030), a new hire (at least in the old days) would need at least 3 seasons to show progress, keeping Wilcox after a 7-5 (or worse) 2025 would leave us with the worst-case scenario for a new hire unless there is a turnaround in 2026 which is hilarious to envision given the schedule.
Pittstop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And depending on "the new hire" - if he is a highly respected, highly regarded, and demonstrably successful HC hire - he would likely want the ability to bring in his own staff, on both sides of the ball. Clean house, in other words, which could precipitate a whole new wave of players exiting for the portal. That wouldn't be an ideal start (or continuation) towards establishing our relevance or worthiness to avoid relegation in the next realignment. The better option could be to roll with an internal option who could keep Anae, Rolo, and most of our players on board if we show significant improvement this season. And even if we show SIGNIFICANT improvement, we will that it's not attributable to JW, because he would be the only factor that is not different from previous seasons.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pittstop said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

I agree retaining Wilcox was a mistake. But I am pretty strongly convinced he will be not be the HC in 2026. When Rivera was actually put in charge it was really late in the game to change the HC. So for now he evaluates Wilcox and the staff. Observes the college football landscape which is different than the NFL. And fundraises to set up the next HC with a chance to win.

Rivera has a big job putting into place everything else that a strong football program needs to win. That is a big job here. For now we have to trust Rivera and Lyons that they know what needs to be done. And that it does not include Wilcox beyond this season.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

I believe the Cal HC job could be attractive if the other pieces are in place. One good season does not make you a strong program. You need to have the pieces in place to do that annually. People fear that removing Wilcox after a good season would hurt their prospects for attracting a strong HC. I disagree with that. Good coaches want a chance to win. If under Rivera/Lyons the program has the structure in place to win they can attract a good coach to lead the team. Good coaches know what that looks like.

But yes time is running out. We can only hope there is enough time to change the narrative around Cal football.


My belief is that RR is going about things the right way. I don't think he would assume a position like FB GM and just start indiscriminately taking a meat ax to the on-field product. I think he has gone about it appropriately by eliminating 'infrastructure inefficiencies' (like Bloesch, Gilbert, AT, & Burl, on O, and 'moving on from Sirmon - regardless of how it was framed - and Tre Brown on D) and building out that part of the infrastructure with quality, proven coaches and leaders; investing in recruiting staff and enhancing the recruiting operation and implementing an actual recruiting plan/approach/model; eliminating any program confusion, ambiguity, and apathy/absence of commitment related to leadership and who is driving the car; being in charge of identifying (with appropriate input from coaches and recruiting leadership) where NIL/Revenue Share dollars should best be allocated. And now that all of the broad infrastructure is 'mostly' in place - and no viable, or lack-of-institutional-support excuses remain - RR has time during his 1st season as FB GM to thoroughly evaluate and consider "JW replacement options" and avoid the knee-jerk, unprepared, willy-nilly emergency [interim] HC appointment we witnessed take place down on The Farm. When he replaces the HC it will be done "the right way", like the professional that he is.

Ron Rivera was not responsible for ANY of those personnel changes. Most happened before he was named GM, long before he was "given the keys" and none happened with his input. It was Wilcox/Harsin. Rivera is spending this year "observing" and advising but if he was going to recommend firing people walking in the door he would replace them with people he has connections to (Toler was one) maybe NFL people, and not people Wilcox/Harsin have connections to.
6956bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

I agree retaining Wilcox was a mistake. But I am pretty strongly convinced he will be not be the HC in 2026. When Rivera was actually put in charge it was really late in the game to change the HC. So for now he evaluates Wilcox and the staff. Observes the college football landscape which is different than the NFL. And fundraises to set up the next HC with a chance to win.

Rivera has a big job putting into place everything else that a strong football program needs to win. That is a big job here. For now we have to trust Rivera and Lyons that they know what needs to be done. And that it does not include Wilcox beyond this season.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

I believe the Cal HC job could be attractive if the other pieces are in place. One good season does not make you a strong program. You need to have the pieces in place to do that annually. People fear that removing Wilcox after a good season would hurt their prospects for attracting a strong HC. I disagree with that. Good coaches want a chance to win. If under Rivera/Lyons the program has the structure in place to win they can attract a good coach to lead the team. Good coaches know what that looks like.

But yes time is running out. We can only hope there is enough time to change the narrative around Cal football.


My belief is that RR is going about things the right way. I don't think he would assume a position like FB GM and just start indiscriminately taking a meat ax to the on-field product. I think he has gone about it appropriately by eliminating 'infrastructure inefficiencies' (like Bloesch, Gilbert, AT, & Burl, on O, and 'moving on from Sirmon - regardless of how it was framed - and Tre Brown on D) and building out that part of the infrastructure with quality, proven coaches and leaders; investing in recruiting staff and enhancing the recruiting operation and implementing an actual recruiting plan/approach/model; eliminating any program confusion, ambiguity, and apathy/absence of commitment related to leadership and who is driving the car; being in charge of identifying (with appropriate input from coaches and recruiting leadership) where NIL/Revenue Share dollars should best be allocated. And now that all of the broad infrastructure is 'mostly' in place - and no viable, or lack-of-institutional-support excuses remain - RR has time during his 1st season as FB GM to thoroughly evaluate and consider "JW replacement options" and avoid the knee-jerk, unprepared, willy-nilly emergency [interim] HC appointment we witnessed take place down on The Farm. When he replaces the HC it will be done "the right way", like the professional that he is.

Ron Rivera was not responsible for ANY of those personnel changes. Most happened before he was named GM, long before he was "given the keys" and none happened with his input. It was Wilcox/Harsin. Rivera is spending this year "observing" and advising but if he was going to recommend firing people walking in the door he would replace them with people he has connections to (Toler was one) maybe NFL people, and not people Wilcox/Harsin have connections to.


Rivera did not have connections to the new coaches hired in. But he will after the season. He is working with this group now. He will see how they operate, how they run the team on gameday and what kind of people they are.

I think if Wilcox goes unless the team does a total nosedive (5 or less wins) the next HC is as likely to come from this staff as not. Not a certainty, but if he believes the program has made the internal changes required to be competitive and he has donor support I think staying within the staff is very possible.

There will be folks that would never want Harsin or Rolovich being the HC here. But I think either is an upgrade over Wilcox. Despite whatever baggage they may have.
Pittstop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

I agree retaining Wilcox was a mistake. But I am pretty strongly convinced he will be not be the HC in 2026. When Rivera was actually put in charge it was really late in the game to change the HC. So for now he evaluates Wilcox and the staff. Observes the college football landscape which is different than the NFL. And fundraises to set up the next HC with a chance to win.

Rivera has a big job putting into place everything else that a strong football program needs to win. That is a big job here. For now we have to trust Rivera and Lyons that they know what needs to be done. And that it does not include Wilcox beyond this season.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

I believe the Cal HC job could be attractive if the other pieces are in place. One good season does not make you a strong program. You need to have the pieces in place to do that annually. People fear that removing Wilcox after a good season would hurt their prospects for attracting a strong HC. I disagree with that. Good coaches want a chance to win. If under Rivera/Lyons the program has the structure in place to win they can attract a good coach to lead the team. Good coaches know what that looks like.

But yes time is running out. We can only hope there is enough time to change the narrative around Cal football.


My belief is that RR is going about things the right way. I don't think he would assume a position like FB GM and just start indiscriminately taking a meat ax to the on-field product. I think he has gone about it appropriately by eliminating 'infrastructure inefficiencies' (like Bloesch, Gilbert, AT, & Burl, on O, and 'moving on from Sirmon - regardless of how it was framed - and Tre Brown on D) and building out that part of the infrastructure with quality, proven coaches and leaders; investing in recruiting staff and enhancing the recruiting operation and implementing an actual recruiting plan/approach/model; eliminating any program confusion, ambiguity, and apathy/absence of commitment related to leadership and who is driving the car; being in charge of identifying (with appropriate input from coaches and recruiting leadership) where NIL/Revenue Share dollars should best be allocated. And now that all of the broad infrastructure is 'mostly' in place - and no viable, or lack-of-institutional-support excuses remain - RR has time during his 1st season as FB GM to thoroughly evaluate and consider "JW replacement options" and avoid the knee-jerk, unprepared, willy-nilly emergency [interim] HC appointment we witnessed take place down on The Farm. When he replaces the HC it will be done "the right way", like the professional that he is.

Ron Rivera was not responsible for ANY of those personnel changes. Most happened before he was named GM, long before he was "given the keys" and none happened with his input. It was Wilcox/Harsin. Rivera is spending this year "observing" and advising but if he was going to recommend firing people walking in the door he would replace them with people he has connections to (Toler was one) maybe NFL people, and not people Wilcox/Harsin have connections to.



You don't know that. Ron "had the keys" from the moment he accepted the job. Most of you just refused to take Sebasta's and Greg's word for it. You needed some kind of proof, like the immediate beheading of JK. Ron will evaluate who will be the best HC candidate for Cal and, more importantly, the 'best HC' for Cal. He has a very deep rolodex from years of professional networking contacts and personal working relationships and NFL Winter Meetings, and Scouting Combines attended, as well as hirings and firings within his own NFL staffs over 13 seasons as an NFL HC, and DC before that. It will not necessarily be a Cal alum. Likely not. It definitely will not be Burl. He's never even been an OC, and has never called a play or designed an offense or a game plan, or a practice plan.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pittstop said:

And depending on "the new hire" - if he is a highly respected, highly regarded, and demonstrably successful HC hire - he would likely want the ability to bring in his own staff, on both sides of the ball. Clean house, in other words, which could precipitate a whole new wave of players exiting for the portal. That wouldn't be an ideal start (or continuation) towards establishing our relevance or worthiness to avoid relegation in the next realignment. The better option could be to roll with an internal option who could keep Anae, Rolo, and most of our players on board if we show significant improvement this season. And even if we show SIGNIFICANT improvement, we will that it's not attributable to JW, because he would be the only factor that is not different from previous seasons.


What is the level of improvement that could get Wilcox fired while warranting an internal promotion?

The only way I see for your "retain Anae" and other coaches solution to happen is if Ron Rivera steps in as head coach and he decides he wants to keep them.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

I agree retaining Wilcox was a mistake. But I am pretty strongly convinced he will be not be the HC in 2026. When Rivera was actually put in charge it was really late in the game to change the HC. So for now he evaluates Wilcox and the staff. Observes the college football landscape which is different than the NFL. And fundraises to set up the next HC with a chance to win.

Rivera has a big job putting into place everything else that a strong football program needs to win. That is a big job here. For now we have to trust Rivera and Lyons that they know what needs to be done. And that it does not include Wilcox beyond this season.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

I believe the Cal HC job could be attractive if the other pieces are in place. One good season does not make you a strong program. You need to have the pieces in place to do that annually. People fear that removing Wilcox after a good season would hurt their prospects for attracting a strong HC. I disagree with that. Good coaches want a chance to win. If under Rivera/Lyons the program has the structure in place to win they can attract a good coach to lead the team. Good coaches know what that looks like.

But yes time is running out. We can only hope there is enough time to change the narrative around Cal football.


My belief is that RR is going about things the right way. I don't think he would assume a position like FB GM and just start indiscriminately taking a meat ax to the on-field product. I think he has gone about it appropriately by eliminating 'infrastructure inefficiencies' (like Bloesch, Gilbert, AT, & Burl, on O, and 'moving on from Sirmon - regardless of how it was framed - and Tre Brown on D) and building out that part of the infrastructure with quality, proven coaches and leaders; investing in recruiting staff and enhancing the recruiting operation and implementing an actual recruiting plan/approach/model; eliminating any program confusion, ambiguity, and apathy/absence of commitment related to leadership and who is driving the car; being in charge of identifying (with appropriate input from coaches and recruiting leadership) where NIL/Revenue Share dollars should best be allocated. And now that all of the broad infrastructure is 'mostly' in place - and no viable, or lack-of-institutional-support excuses remain - RR has time during his 1st season as FB GM to thoroughly evaluate and consider "JW replacement options" and avoid the knee-jerk, unprepared, willy-nilly emergency [interim] HC appointment we witnessed take place down on The Farm. When he replaces the HC it will be done "the right way", like the professional that he is.

Ron Rivera was not responsible for ANY of those personnel changes. Most happened before he was named GM, long before he was "given the keys" and none happened with his input. It was Wilcox/Harsin. Rivera is spending this year "observing" and advising but if he was going to recommend firing people walking in the door he would replace them with people he has connections to (Toler was one) maybe NFL people, and not people Wilcox/Harsin have connections to.



You don't know that. Ron "had the keys" from the moment he accepted the job. Most of you just refused to take Sebasta's and Greg's word for it. You needed some kind of proof, like the immediate beheading of JK. Ron will evaluate who will be the best HC candidate for Cal and, more importantly, the 'best HC' for Cal. He has a very deep rolodex from years of professional networking contacts and personal working relationships and NFL Winter Meetings, and Scouting Combines attended, as well as hirings and firings within his own NFL staffs over 13 seasons as an NFL HC, and DC before that. It will not necessarily be a Cal alum. Likely not. It definitely will not be Burl. He's never even been an OC, and has never called a play or designed an offense or a game plan, or a practice plan.

You have it wrong. Sebasta was very vocal about withholding his NIL contribution until he was assured Rivera was given the keys because he believed he had not been. That was long after the personnel changes. Moreover, there is absolutely no way Ron Rivera comes in and immediately pushes out fellow Cal alum and Cal legacy Burl Toler and alienates the entire Toler family (all Cal alums) and all their Cal alumni friends in Berkeley and the East Bay in order to bring in a WR coach that worked for Harsin in the past? That was all Harsin.
panda
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

I agree retaining Wilcox was a mistake. But I am pretty strongly convinced he will be not be the HC in 2026. When Rivera was actually put in charge it was really late in the game to change the HC. So for now he evaluates Wilcox and the staff. Observes the college football landscape which is different than the NFL. And fundraises to set up the next HC with a chance to win.

Rivera has a big job putting into place everything else that a strong football program needs to win. That is a big job here. For now we have to trust Rivera and Lyons that they know what needs to be done. And that it does not include Wilcox beyond this season.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

I believe the Cal HC job could be attractive if the other pieces are in place. One good season does not make you a strong program. You need to have the pieces in place to do that annually. People fear that removing Wilcox after a good season would hurt their prospects for attracting a strong HC. I disagree with that. Good coaches want a chance to win. If under Rivera/Lyons the program has the structure in place to win they can attract a good coach to lead the team. Good coaches know what that looks like.

But yes time is running out. We can only hope there is enough time to change the narrative around Cal football.


My belief is that RR is going about things the right way. I don't think he would assume a position like FB GM and just start indiscriminately taking a meat ax to the on-field product. I think he has gone about it appropriately by eliminating 'infrastructure inefficiencies' (like Bloesch, Gilbert, AT, & Burl, on O, and 'moving on from Sirmon - regardless of how it was framed - and Tre Brown on D) and building out that part of the infrastructure with quality, proven coaches and leaders; investing in recruiting staff and enhancing the recruiting operation and implementing an actual recruiting plan/approach/model; eliminating any program confusion, ambiguity, and apathy/absence of commitment related to leadership and who is driving the car; being in charge of identifying (with appropriate input from coaches and recruiting leadership) where NIL/Revenue Share dollars should best be allocated. And now that all of the broad infrastructure is 'mostly' in place - and no viable, or lack-of-institutional-support excuses remain - RR has time during his 1st season as FB GM to thoroughly evaluate and consider "JW replacement options" and avoid the knee-jerk, unprepared, willy-nilly emergency [interim] HC appointment we witnessed take place down on The Farm. When he replaces the HC it will be done "the right way", like the professional that he is.

Ron Rivera was not responsible for ANY of those personnel changes. Most happened before he was named GM, long before he was "given the keys" and none happened with his input. It was Wilcox/Harsin. Rivera is spending this year "observing" and advising but if he was going to recommend firing people walking in the door he would replace them with people he has connections to (Toler was one) maybe NFL people, and not people Wilcox/Harsin have connections to.



You don't know that. Ron "had the keys" from the moment he accepted the job. Most of you just refused to take Sebasta's and Greg's word for it. You needed some kind of proof, like the immediate beheading of JK. Ron will evaluate who will be the best HC candidate for Cal and, more importantly, the 'best HC' for Cal. He has a very deep rolodex from years of professional networking contacts and personal working relationships and NFL Winter Meetings, and Scouting Combines attended, as well as hirings and firings within his own NFL staffs over 13 seasons as an NFL HC, and DC before that. It will not necessarily be a Cal alum. Likely not. It definitely will not be Burl. He's never even been an OC, and has never called a play or designed an offense or a game plan, or a practice plan.

You have it wrong. Sebasta was very vocal about withholding his NIL contribution until he was assured Rivera was given the keys. That was after the personnel changes. Moreover, I'm pretty sure Rivera had a stronger connection to Burl and the Toler family than to anyone else on the staff.


Yeah pretty sure the whole #GiveRonTheKeys movement SB and Greg started was because Ron did NOT have the keys and Wilcox was still reporting to Knowlton. Either way it's all moot now because Ron does indeed have the keys. Now the question is will he do what needs to be done if we are stuck with another average year by Wilcox? Or do we keep delaying the inevitable?

I know people have fears about changing coaches such as whether the new coach will be better and how many players we will retain/lose to the portal. But here's the thing - I much rather have one rebuilding year if it meant we had a chance to exceed 9+ wins after versus what we currently have which is almost always sit at 5-7 wins like we have under Wilcox throughout his entire tenure. This upcoming season is literally Wilcox's best chance at hitting 8+ wins after so many chances. If he cant do it, we know all we need to know (or should already know) about his coaching capabilities.

And the fear about losing players to the portal, didnt we just lose a bunch of guys to the portal already? And yet because we brought on new coaches like Anae, they managed to recruit replacements? The fear of losing players to the portal is moot IMO. We are losing them regardless with Wllcox as coach.

Lets see how this upcoming season goes. But I doubt Wilcox is really the best we can do as coach. We can do better, especially now with Ron as GM.
Pittstop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

I agree retaining Wilcox was a mistake. But I am pretty strongly convinced he will be not be the HC in 2026. When Rivera was actually put in charge it was really late in the game to change the HC. So for now he evaluates Wilcox and the staff. Observes the college football landscape which is different than the NFL. And fundraises to set up the next HC with a chance to win.

Rivera has a big job putting into place everything else that a strong football program needs to win. That is a big job here. For now we have to trust Rivera and Lyons that they know what needs to be done. And that it does not include Wilcox beyond this season.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

I believe the Cal HC job could be attractive if the other pieces are in place. One good season does not make you a strong program. You need to have the pieces in place to do that annually. People fear that removing Wilcox after a good season would hurt their prospects for attracting a strong HC. I disagree with that. Good coaches want a chance to win. If under Rivera/Lyons the program has the structure in place to win they can attract a good coach to lead the team. Good coaches know what that looks like.

But yes time is running out. We can only hope there is enough time to change the narrative around Cal football.


My belief is that RR is going about things the right way. I don't think he would assume a position like FB GM and just start indiscriminately taking a meat ax to the on-field product. I think he has gone about it appropriately by eliminating 'infrastructure inefficiencies' (like Bloesch, Gilbert, AT, & Burl, on O, and 'moving on from Sirmon - regardless of how it was framed - and Tre Brown on D) and building out that part of the infrastructure with quality, proven coaches and leaders; investing in recruiting staff and enhancing the recruiting operation and implementing an actual recruiting plan/approach/model; eliminating any program confusion, ambiguity, and apathy/absence of commitment related to leadership and who is driving the car; being in charge of identifying (with appropriate input from coaches and recruiting leadership) where NIL/Revenue Share dollars should best be allocated. And now that all of the broad infrastructure is 'mostly' in place - and no viable, or lack-of-institutional-support excuses remain - RR has time during his 1st season as FB GM to thoroughly evaluate and consider "JW replacement options" and avoid the knee-jerk, unprepared, willy-nilly emergency [interim] HC appointment we witnessed take place down on The Farm. When he replaces the HC it will be done "the right way", like the professional that he is.

Ron Rivera was not responsible for ANY of those personnel changes. Most happened before he was named GM, long before he was "given the keys" and none happened with his input. It was Wilcox/Harsin. Rivera is spending this year "observing" and advising but if he was going to recommend firing people walking in the door he would replace them with people he has connections to (Toler was one) maybe NFL people, and not people Wilcox/Harsin have connections to.



You don't know that. Ron "had the keys" from the moment he accepted the job. Most of you just refused to take Sebasta's and Greg's word for it. You needed some kind of proof, like the immediate beheading of JK. Ron will evaluate who will be the best HC candidate for Cal and, more importantly, the 'best HC' for Cal. He has a very deep rolodex from years of professional networking contacts and personal working relationships and NFL Winter Meetings, and Scouting Combines attended, as well as hirings and firings within his own NFL staffs over 13 seasons as an NFL HC, and DC before that. It will not necessarily be a Cal alum. Likely not. It definitely will not be Burl. He's never even been an OC, and has never called a play or designed an offense or a game plan, or a practice plan.

You have it wrong. Sebasta was very vocal about withholding his NIL contribution until he was assured Rivera was given the keys because he believed he had not been. That was long after the personnel changes. Moreover, there is absolutely no way Ron Rivera comes in and immediately pushes out fellow Cal alum and Cal legacy Burl Toler and alienates the entire Toler family (all Cal alums) and all their Cal alumni friends in Berkeley and the East Bay in order to bring in a WR coach that worked for Harsin in the past? That was all Harsin.


Not trying to speak for Sebasta by any means, and I remember well his leadership in the campaign to withold further financial support from the program until Lyons made it unequivocally clear that Ron had total control of fb by both clarifying that JW was HIS
direct report, and by resolving the JK situation that contiinuesd to hang like a spectre over the fb program and undermine confidence in the new structure. Nevertheless it was stated early, by Sebasta and others - including Ron himself - that "Ron had the keys". But ultimately as the JK shadow persisted, and constant doubts were expressed daily on here and on TOS, I believe that Sebasta felt he needed to press the action to the middle of the table - to exert the maximum leverage at his disposal - to erase all doubt, and all the naysayers, and to assuage the concerns of all of the 'would be' and 'might be' donors who remained on the sidelines until they could be absolutely , unequivocally sure. But that doesn't mean that it wasn't so all the time. It's just that Ron's initial word and Sebasta's initial word, based on what he obviously understood, and relayed to us up front, wasn't good enough. And next steps ultimately had to be taken. That is basically my recollection of the entire process. Sebasta can correct me if I am misstating the correct chronology.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

I agree retaining Wilcox was a mistake. But I am pretty strongly convinced he will be not be the HC in 2026. When Rivera was actually put in charge it was really late in the game to change the HC. So for now he evaluates Wilcox and the staff. Observes the college football landscape which is different than the NFL. And fundraises to set up the next HC with a chance to win.

Rivera has a big job putting into place everything else that a strong football program needs to win. That is a big job here. For now we have to trust Rivera and Lyons that they know what needs to be done. And that it does not include Wilcox beyond this season.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

I believe the Cal HC job could be attractive if the other pieces are in place. One good season does not make you a strong program. You need to have the pieces in place to do that annually. People fear that removing Wilcox after a good season would hurt their prospects for attracting a strong HC. I disagree with that. Good coaches want a chance to win. If under Rivera/Lyons the program has the structure in place to win they can attract a good coach to lead the team. Good coaches know what that looks like.

But yes time is running out. We can only hope there is enough time to change the narrative around Cal football.


My belief is that RR is going about things the right way. I don't think he would assume a position like FB GM and just start indiscriminately taking a meat ax to the on-field product. I think he has gone about it appropriately by eliminating 'infrastructure inefficiencies' (like Bloesch, Gilbert, AT, & Burl, on O, and 'moving on from Sirmon - regardless of how it was framed - and Tre Brown on D) and building out that part of the infrastructure with quality, proven coaches and leaders; investing in recruiting staff and enhancing the recruiting operation and implementing an actual recruiting plan/approach/model; eliminating any program confusion, ambiguity, and apathy/absence of commitment related to leadership and who is driving the car; being in charge of identifying (with appropriate input from coaches and recruiting leadership) where NIL/Revenue Share dollars should best be allocated. And now that all of the broad infrastructure is 'mostly' in place - and no viable, or lack-of-institutional-support excuses remain - RR has time during his 1st season as FB GM to thoroughly evaluate and consider "JW replacement options" and avoid the knee-jerk, unprepared, willy-nilly emergency [interim] HC appointment we witnessed take place down on The Farm. When he replaces the HC it will be done "the right way", like the professional that he is.

Ron Rivera was not responsible for ANY of those personnel changes. Most happened before he was named GM, long before he was "given the keys" and none happened with his input. It was Wilcox/Harsin. Rivera is spending this year "observing" and advising but if he was going to recommend firing people walking in the door he would replace them with people he has connections to (Toler was one) maybe NFL people, and not people Wilcox/Harsin have connections to.



You don't know that. Ron "had the keys" from the moment he accepted the job. Most of you just refused to take Sebasta's and Greg's word for it. You needed some kind of proof, like the immediate beheading of JK. Ron will evaluate who will be the best HC candidate for Cal and, more importantly, the 'best HC' for Cal. He has a very deep rolodex from years of professional networking contacts and personal working relationships and NFL Winter Meetings, and Scouting Combines attended, as well as hirings and firings within his own NFL staffs over 13 seasons as an NFL HC, and DC before that. It will not necessarily be a Cal alum. Likely not. It definitely will not be Burl. He's never even been an OC, and has never called a play or designed an offense or a game plan, or a practice plan.

You have it wrong. Sebasta was very vocal about withholding his NIL contribution until he was assured Rivera was given the keys because he believed he had not been. That was long after the personnel changes. Moreover, there is absolutely no way Ron Rivera comes in and immediately pushes out fellow Cal alum and Cal legacy Burl Toler and alienates the entire Toler family (all Cal alums) and all their Cal alumni friends in Berkeley and the East Bay in order to bring in a WR coach that worked for Harsin in the past? That was all Harsin.


Not trying to speak for Sebasta by any means, and I remember well his leadership in the campaign to withold further financial support from the program until Lyons made it unequivocally clear that Ron had total control of fb by both clarifying that JW was HIS
direct report, and by resolving the JK situation that contiinuesd to hang like a spectre over the fb program and undermine confidence in the new structure. Nevertheless it was stated early, by Sebasta and others - including Ron himself - that "Ron had the keys". But ultimately as the JK shadow persisted, and constant doubts were expressed daily on here and on TOS, I believe that Sebasta felt he needed to press the action to the middle of the table - to exert the maximum leverage at his disposal - to erase all doubt, and all the naysayers, and to assuage the concerns of all of the 'would be' and 'might be' donors who remained on the sidelines until they could be absolutely , unequivocally sure. But that doesn't mean that it wasn't so all the time. It's just that Ron's initial word and Sebasta's initial word, based on what he obviously understood, and relayed to us up front, wasn't good enough. And next steps ultimately had to be taken. That is basically my recollection of the entire process. Sebasta can correct me if I am misstating the correct chronology.


Sebasta said essentially "I'm not speaking for others or telling them what to do, but I am withholding my money until Ron is given the keys."

And again, Toler, a Cal alum that Rivera knows and has worked with in California Legends as our best recruiter, was replaced by Cefalo, a WR coach from Utah State who worked with Harsin at two other stops (Boise State and Arkansas State) and was named on December 13, 2024 according to Calbears.com. That is three days after Harsin was named OC but 4 months before Rivera was even named GM in late March 2025 and 7 months before Rivera was "given the keys" in June 2025, with Knowlton announcing his "retirement" later that same month. All the personnel changes have been Wilcox/Harsin.
Pittstop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

I agree retaining Wilcox was a mistake. But I am pretty strongly convinced he will be not be the HC in 2026. When Rivera was actually put in charge it was really late in the game to change the HC. So for now he evaluates Wilcox and the staff. Observes the college football landscape which is different than the NFL. And fundraises to set up the next HC with a chance to win.

Rivera has a big job putting into place everything else that a strong football program needs to win. That is a big job here. For now we have to trust Rivera and Lyons that they know what needs to be done. And that it does not include Wilcox beyond this season.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

I believe the Cal HC job could be attractive if the other pieces are in place. One good season does not make you a strong program. You need to have the pieces in place to do that annually. People fear that removing Wilcox after a good season would hurt their prospects for attracting a strong HC. I disagree with that. Good coaches want a chance to win. If under Rivera/Lyons the program has the structure in place to win they can attract a good coach to lead the team. Good coaches know what that looks like.

But yes time is running out. We can only hope there is enough time to change the narrative around Cal football.


My belief is that RR is going about things the right way. I don't think he would assume a position like FB GM and just start indiscriminately taking a meat ax to the on-field product. I think he has gone about it appropriately by eliminating 'infrastructure inefficiencies' (like Bloesch, Gilbert, AT, & Burl, on O, and 'moving on from Sirmon - regardless of how it was framed - and Tre Brown on D) and building out that part of the infrastructure with quality, proven coaches and leaders; investing in recruiting staff and enhancing the recruiting operation and implementing an actual recruiting plan/approach/model; eliminating any program confusion, ambiguity, and apathy/absence of commitment related to leadership and who is driving the car; being in charge of identifying (with appropriate input from coaches and recruiting leadership) where NIL/Revenue Share dollars should best be allocated. And now that all of the broad infrastructure is 'mostly' in place - and no viable, or lack-of-institutional-support excuses remain - RR has time during his 1st season as FB GM to thoroughly evaluate and consider "JW replacement options" and avoid the knee-jerk, unprepared, willy-nilly emergency [interim] HC appointment we witnessed take place down on The Farm. When he replaces the HC it will be done "the right way", like the professional that he is.

Ron Rivera was not responsible for ANY of those personnel changes. Most happened before he was named GM, long before he was "given the keys" and none happened with his input. It was Wilcox/Harsin. Rivera is spending this year "observing" and advising but if he was going to recommend firing people walking in the door he would replace them with people he has connections to (Toler was one) maybe NFL people, and not people Wilcox/Harsin have connections to.



You don't know that. Ron "had the keys" from the moment he accepted the job. Most of you just refused to take Sebasta's and Greg's word for it. You needed some kind of proof, like the immediate beheading of JK. Ron will evaluate who will be the best HC candidate for Cal and, more importantly, the 'best HC' for Cal. He has a very deep rolodex from years of professional networking contacts and personal working relationships and NFL Winter Meetings, and Scouting Combines attended, as well as hirings and firings within his own NFL staffs over 13 seasons as an NFL HC, and DC before that. It will not necessarily be a Cal alum. Likely not. It definitely will not be Burl. He's never even been an OC, and has never called a play or designed an offense or a game plan, or a practice plan.

You have it wrong. Sebasta was very vocal about withholding his NIL contribution until he was assured Rivera was given the keys because he believed he had not been. That was long after the personnel changes. Moreover, there is absolutely no way Ron Rivera comes in and immediately pushes out fellow Cal alum and Cal legacy Burl Toler and alienates the entire Toler family (all Cal alums) and all their Cal alumni friends in Berkeley and the East Bay in order to bring in a WR coach that worked for Harsin in the past? That was all Harsin.


Not trying to speak for Sebasta by any means, and I remember well his leadership in the campaign to withold further financial support from the program until Lyons made it unequivocally clear that Ron had total control of fb by both clarifying that JW was HIS
direct report, and by resolving the JK situation that contiinuesd to hang like a spectre over the fb program and undermine confidence in the new structure. Nevertheless it was stated early, by Sebasta and others - including Ron himself - that "Ron had the keys". But ultimately as the JK shadow persisted, and constant doubts were expressed daily on here and on TOS, I believe that Sebasta felt he needed to press the action to the middle of the table - to exert the maximum leverage at his disposal - to erase all doubt, and all the naysayers, and to assuage the concerns of all of the 'would be' and 'might be' donors who remained on the sidelines until they could be absolutely , unequivocally sure. But that doesn't mean that it wasn't so all the time. It's just that Ron's initial word and Sebasta's initial word, based on what he obviously understood, and relayed to us up front, wasn't good enough. And next steps ultimately had to be taken. That is basically my recollection of the entire process. Sebasta can correct me if I am misstating the correct chronology.


Sebasta said essentially "I'm not speaking for others or telling them what to do, but I am withholding my money until Ron is given the keys."

And again, Toler, a Cal alum that Rivera knows and has worked with in California Legends as our best recruiter, was replaced by Cefalo, a WR coach from Utah State who worked with Harsin at two other stops (Boise State and Arkansas State) and was named on December 13, 2024 according to Calbears.com. That is three days after Harsin was named OC but 4 months before Rivera was even named GM in late March 2025 and 7 months before Rivera was "given the keys" in June 2025, with Knowlton announcing his "retirement" later that same month.
All the personnel changes have been Wilcox/Harsin.


I keep hearing - from a few isolated corners of BI - that "Burl was our best recruiter". WHO has he ever recruited that was a legitimate 4 or 5 star recruit? And of those [ostensibly] borderline 4-star wrs he recruited (and before that he was a rb coach), which ones did he ever develop, coach up, or otherwise 'improve', to a level of talent, skill, or proficiency where an NFL team was even remotely interested enough to commit even a 'Mr. Irrelevant'- level draft pick for? Please, remind me.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

I agree retaining Wilcox was a mistake. But I am pretty strongly convinced he will be not be the HC in 2026. When Rivera was actually put in charge it was really late in the game to change the HC. So for now he evaluates Wilcox and the staff. Observes the college football landscape which is different than the NFL. And fundraises to set up the next HC with a chance to win.

Rivera has a big job putting into place everything else that a strong football program needs to win. That is a big job here. For now we have to trust Rivera and Lyons that they know what needs to be done. And that it does not include Wilcox beyond this season.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

I believe the Cal HC job could be attractive if the other pieces are in place. One good season does not make you a strong program. You need to have the pieces in place to do that annually. People fear that removing Wilcox after a good season would hurt their prospects for attracting a strong HC. I disagree with that. Good coaches want a chance to win. If under Rivera/Lyons the program has the structure in place to win they can attract a good coach to lead the team. Good coaches know what that looks like.

But yes time is running out. We can only hope there is enough time to change the narrative around Cal football.


My belief is that RR is going about things the right way. I don't think he would assume a position like FB GM and just start indiscriminately taking a meat ax to the on-field product. I think he has gone about it appropriately by eliminating 'infrastructure inefficiencies' (like Bloesch, Gilbert, AT, & Burl, on O, and 'moving on from Sirmon - regardless of how it was framed - and Tre Brown on D) and building out that part of the infrastructure with quality, proven coaches and leaders; investing in recruiting staff and enhancing the recruiting operation and implementing an actual recruiting plan/approach/model; eliminating any program confusion, ambiguity, and apathy/absence of commitment related to leadership and who is driving the car; being in charge of identifying (with appropriate input from coaches and recruiting leadership) where NIL/Revenue Share dollars should best be allocated. And now that all of the broad infrastructure is 'mostly' in place - and no viable, or lack-of-institutional-support excuses remain - RR has time during his 1st season as FB GM to thoroughly evaluate and consider "JW replacement options" and avoid the knee-jerk, unprepared, willy-nilly emergency [interim] HC appointment we witnessed take place down on The Farm. When he replaces the HC it will be done "the right way", like the professional that he is.

Ron Rivera was not responsible for ANY of those personnel changes. Most happened before he was named GM, long before he was "given the keys" and none happened with his input. It was Wilcox/Harsin. Rivera is spending this year "observing" and advising but if he was going to recommend firing people walking in the door he would replace them with people he has connections to (Toler was one) maybe NFL people, and not people Wilcox/Harsin have connections to.



You don't know that. Ron "had the keys" from the moment he accepted the job. Most of you just refused to take Sebasta's and Greg's word for it. You needed some kind of proof, like the immediate beheading of JK. Ron will evaluate who will be the best HC candidate for Cal and, more importantly, the 'best HC' for Cal. He has a very deep rolodex from years of professional networking contacts and personal working relationships and NFL Winter Meetings, and Scouting Combines attended, as well as hirings and firings within his own NFL staffs over 13 seasons as an NFL HC, and DC before that. It will not necessarily be a Cal alum. Likely not. It definitely will not be Burl. He's never even been an OC, and has never called a play or designed an offense or a game plan, or a practice plan.

You have it wrong. Sebasta was very vocal about withholding his NIL contribution until he was assured Rivera was given the keys because he believed he had not been. That was long after the personnel changes. Moreover, there is absolutely no way Ron Rivera comes in and immediately pushes out fellow Cal alum and Cal legacy Burl Toler and alienates the entire Toler family (all Cal alums) and all their Cal alumni friends in Berkeley and the East Bay in order to bring in a WR coach that worked for Harsin in the past? That was all Harsin.


Not trying to speak for Sebasta by any means, and I remember well his leadership in the campaign to withold further financial support from the program until Lyons made it unequivocally clear that Ron had total control of fb by both clarifying that JW was HIS
direct report, and by resolving the JK situation that contiinuesd to hang like a spectre over the fb program and undermine confidence in the new structure. Nevertheless it was stated early, by Sebasta and others - including Ron himself - that "Ron had the keys". But ultimately as the JK shadow persisted, and constant doubts were expressed daily on here and on TOS, I believe that Sebasta felt he needed to press the action to the middle of the table - to exert the maximum leverage at his disposal - to erase all doubt, and all the naysayers, and to assuage the concerns of all of the 'would be' and 'might be' donors who remained on the sidelines until they could be absolutely , unequivocally sure. But that doesn't mean that it wasn't so all the time. It's just that Ron's initial word and Sebasta's initial word, based on what he obviously understood, and relayed to us up front, wasn't good enough. And next steps ultimately had to be taken. That is basically my recollection of the entire process. Sebasta can correct me if I am misstating the correct chronology.


Sebasta said essentially "I'm not speaking for others or telling them what to do, but I am withholding my money until Ron is given the keys."

And again, Toler, a Cal alum that Rivera knows and has worked with in California Legends as our best recruiter, was replaced by Cefalo, a WR coach from Utah State who worked with Harsin at two other stops (Boise State and Arkansas State) and was named on December 13, 2024 according to Calbears.com. That is three days after Harsin was named OC but 4 months before Rivera was even named GM in late March 2025 and 7 months before Rivera was "given the keys" in June 2025, with Knowlton announcing his "retirement" later that same month.
All the personnel changes have been Wilcox/Harsin.


I keep hearing - from a few isolated corners of BI - that "Burl was our best recruiter". WHO has he ever recruited that was a legitimate 4 or 5 star recruit? And of those [ostensibly] borderline 4-star wrs he recruited (and before that he was a rb coach), which ones did he ever develop, coach up, or otherwise 'improve', to a level of talent, skill, or proficiency where an NFL team was even remotely interested enough to commit even a 'Mr. Irrelevant'- level draft pick for? Please, remind me.

Wilcox has had zero high school recruits drafted, and all our drafted players have been on defense, almost all DBs. He has had a staff of poor recruiters, but our best recruiting has been at WR and DB, with a nod to RB recently. OL, DL, and QB recruiting has been terrible.

There is a lot more to an offense than the WRs, but we landed more 4 star talent there than any other position, offense or defense. We have been consistently the worse offense on our conference under Wilcox, but have repeatedly had freshman star WRs who departed for greener pastures after big freshman years under Toler. Nyziah Hunter is just the latest.

The only player Toler coached that got drafted was KeeSean Johnson when Toler was WR coach for his old college coach, Jeff Tedford at Fresno State. Though I bet Hunter will get drafted.

Toler has coached 7 players that made NFL rosters, including Patrick Laird when he was RB coach. Laird was a revelation, but a lot of credit goes to Toler for giving him the carries despite being a walk-on. More recently, Toler found the Jet, Javan Thomas. 4.0 student from Oakland. Prototypical Cal football player. Similarly Toler had a WR at UC Davis that lead FCS in receiving and made the NFL. Context matters.

No we haven't had a Desean Jackson or Keenan Allen, but if we had a good offense, Toler would give us a good shot at landing one. However, maybe another charismatic alum like Geoff McArthur? People here now realize that having a Polynesian OL coach from Hawaii helps us land Polynesian kids including from Hawaii (something long known by most of the top programs on the West Coast who have long had Polynesian OL and DL coaches). Well, I assert it is good for recruiting African American players from LA and the East Bay to have an African American from California on the offensive staff. A Cal alum, even better. A Cal alum, in a big family of Cal alums, spread throughout the state that can make recruits and their families feel like family? I don't think it was smart of Harsin to fire him on day 1 without understanding that, but maybe that is just me.
GivemTheAxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

Strykur said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

8-4 would be the worst result because that is no man's land in regards to results and trajectory of the program, 9-3 means we won at least a game against one of the better opponents on the schedule and are on the fringes of playoff contention, 7-5 at least gives us enough to change things but since 8-4 does not and is not a big upward move, puts us nowhere.


Agree, but my fear is that even 7-5 would put us in "no man's land" as far as the University is concerned, as it could interpreted as the program trending in the right direction.

2022: 4-8
2023: 6-6
2024: 6-6
2025: 7-5

And he will still have 2 years left on his contract at 5 million per.

Hopefully, this is where RR and a few major donors would step in. And Chancellor Lyons would understand.

If we listen carefully to Chancellor Lyons comments when Ron Rivera was hired
7 wins won't cut it and Wilcox is GONE!!!
GivemTheAxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

I agree retaining Wilcox was a mistake. But I am pretty strongly convinced he will be not be the HC in 2026. When Rivera was actually put in charge it was really late in the game to change the HC. So for now he evaluates Wilcox and the staff. Observes the college football landscape which is different than the NFL. And fundraises to set up the next HC with a chance to win.

Rivera has a big job putting into place everything else that a strong football program needs to win. That is a big job here. For now we have to trust Rivera and Lyons that they know what needs to be done. And that it does not include Wilcox beyond this season.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

I believe the Cal HC job could be attractive if the other pieces are in place. One good season does not make you a strong program. You need to have the pieces in place to do that annually. People fear that removing Wilcox after a good season would hurt their prospects for attracting a strong HC. I disagree with that. Good coaches want a chance to win. If under Rivera/Lyons the program has the structure in place to win they can attract a good coach to lead the team. Good coaches know what that looks like.

But yes time is running out. We can only hope there is enough time to change the narrative around Cal football.


My belief is that RR is going about things the right way. I don't think he would assume a position like FB GM and just start indiscriminately taking a meat ax to the on-field product. I think he has gone about it appropriately by eliminating 'infrastructure inefficiencies' (like Bloesch, Gilbert, AT, & Burl, on O, and 'moving on from Sirmon - regardless of how it was framed - and Tre Brown on D) and building out that part of the infrastructure with quality, proven coaches and leaders; investing in recruiting staff and enhancing the recruiting operation and implementing an actual recruiting plan/approach/model; eliminating any program confusion, ambiguity, and apathy/absence of commitment related to leadership and who is driving the car; being in charge of identifying (with appropriate input from coaches and recruiting leadership) where NIL/Revenue Share dollars should best be allocated. And now that all of the broad infrastructure is 'mostly' in place - and no viable, or lack-of-institutional-support excuses remain - RR has time during his 1st season as FB GM to thoroughly evaluate and consider "JW replacement options" and avoid the knee-jerk, unprepared, willy-nilly emergency [interim] HC appointment we witnessed take place down on The Farm. When he replaces the HC it will be done "the right way", like the professional that he is.

Ron Rivera was not responsible for ANY of those personnel changes. Most happened before he was named GM, long before he was "given the keys" and none happened with his input. It was Wilcox/Harsin. Rivera is spending this year "observing" and advising but if he was going to recommend firing people walking in the door he would replace them with people he has connections to (Toler was one) maybe NFL people, and not people Wilcox/Harsin have connections to.



You don't know that. Ron "had the keys" from the moment he accepted the job. Most of you just refused to take Sebasta's and Greg's word for it. You needed some kind of proof, like the immediate beheading of JK. Ron will evaluate who will be the best HC candidate for Cal and, more importantly, the 'best HC' for Cal. He has a very deep rolodex from years of professional networking contacts and personal working relationships and NFL Winter Meetings, and Scouting Combines attended, as well as hirings and firings within his own NFL staffs over 13 seasons as an NFL HC, and DC before that. It will not necessarily be a Cal alum. Likely not. It definitely will not be Burl. He's never even been an OC, and has never called a play or designed an offense or a game plan, or a practice plan.

I totally agree with this statement. I (and some others on this board) said so back when Ron was hired. Taking Lyons at his word, from that moment on RR was in the driver's seat. Many on this board disagreed and said RR needed to be officially 'Given the Keys.' I agreed with those posters on this board that hypothesized that there were some Admin requirements that had to be cleared before Ron could be Given the Keys officially.

calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GivemTheAxe said:

Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

I agree retaining Wilcox was a mistake. But I am pretty strongly convinced he will be not be the HC in 2026. When Rivera was actually put in charge it was really late in the game to change the HC. So for now he evaluates Wilcox and the staff. Observes the college football landscape which is different than the NFL. And fundraises to set up the next HC with a chance to win.

Rivera has a big job putting into place everything else that a strong football program needs to win. That is a big job here. For now we have to trust Rivera and Lyons that they know what needs to be done. And that it does not include Wilcox beyond this season.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

I believe the Cal HC job could be attractive if the other pieces are in place. One good season does not make you a strong program. You need to have the pieces in place to do that annually. People fear that removing Wilcox after a good season would hurt their prospects for attracting a strong HC. I disagree with that. Good coaches want a chance to win. If under Rivera/Lyons the program has the structure in place to win they can attract a good coach to lead the team. Good coaches know what that looks like.

But yes time is running out. We can only hope there is enough time to change the narrative around Cal football.


My belief is that RR is going about things the right way. I don't think he would assume a position like FB GM and just start indiscriminately taking a meat ax to the on-field product. I think he has gone about it appropriately by eliminating 'infrastructure inefficiencies' (like Bloesch, Gilbert, AT, & Burl, on O, and 'moving on from Sirmon - regardless of how it was framed - and Tre Brown on D) and building out that part of the infrastructure with quality, proven coaches and leaders; investing in recruiting staff and enhancing the recruiting operation and implementing an actual recruiting plan/approach/model; eliminating any program confusion, ambiguity, and apathy/absence of commitment related to leadership and who is driving the car; being in charge of identifying (with appropriate input from coaches and recruiting leadership) where NIL/Revenue Share dollars should best be allocated. And now that all of the broad infrastructure is 'mostly' in place - and no viable, or lack-of-institutional-support excuses remain - RR has time during his 1st season as FB GM to thoroughly evaluate and consider "JW replacement options" and avoid the knee-jerk, unprepared, willy-nilly emergency [interim] HC appointment we witnessed take place down on The Farm. When he replaces the HC it will be done "the right way", like the professional that he is.

Ron Rivera was not responsible for ANY of those personnel changes. Most happened before he was named GM, long before he was "given the keys" and none happened with his input. It was Wilcox/Harsin. Rivera is spending this year "observing" and advising but if he was going to recommend firing people walking in the door he would replace them with people he has connections to (Toler was one) maybe NFL people, and not people Wilcox/Harsin have connections to.



You don't know that. Ron "had the keys" from the moment he accepted the job. Most of you just refused to take Sebasta's and Greg's word for it. You needed some kind of proof, like the immediate beheading of JK. Ron will evaluate who will be the best HC candidate for Cal and, more importantly, the 'best HC' for Cal. He has a very deep rolodex from years of professional networking contacts and personal working relationships and NFL Winter Meetings, and Scouting Combines attended, as well as hirings and firings within his own NFL staffs over 13 seasons as an NFL HC, and DC before that. It will not necessarily be a Cal alum. Likely not. It definitely will not be Burl. He's never even been an OC, and has never called a play or designed an offense or a game plan, or a practice plan.

I totally agree with this statement. I (and some others on this board) said so back when Ron was hired. Taking Lyons at his word, from that moment on RR was in the driver's seat. Many on this board disagreed and said RR needed to be officially 'Given the Keys.' I agreed with those posters on this board that hypothesized that there were some Admin requirements that had to be cleared before Ron could be Given the Keys officially.



Maybe you did, but I trust Sebasta on this and he was willing to put his money on the line.

And it still ignores the timing. The personnel changes were all made months before Ron was even hired in March, whether he was "given the keys" then or in June does not affect that basic fact. This staff is 100% Wilcox/Harsin's.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
panda said:


Yeah pretty sure the whole #GiveRonTheKeys movement SB and Greg started was because Ron did NOT have the keys and Wilcox was still reporting to Knowlton. Either way it's all moot now because Ron does indeed have the keys. Now the question is will he do what needs to be done if we are stuck with another average year by Wilcox? Or do we keep delaying the inevitable?

I know people have fears about changing coaches such as whether the new coach will be better and how many players we will retain/lose to the portal. But here's the thing - I much rather have one rebuilding year if it meant we had a chance to exceed 9+ wins after versus what we currently have which is almost always sit at 5-7 wins like we have under Wilcox throughout his entire tenure. This upcoming season is literally Wilcox's best chance at hitting 8+ wins after so many chances. If he cant do it, we know all we need to know (or should already know) about his coaching capabilities.

And the fear about losing players to the portal, didnt we just lose a bunch of guys to the portal already? And yet because we brought on new coaches like Anae, they managed to recruit replacements? The fear of losing players to the portal is moot IMO. We are losing them regardless with Wllcox as coach.

Lets see how this upcoming season goes. But I doubt Wilcox is really the best we can do as coach. We can do better, especially now with Ron as GM.


Given the relatively easy schedule this coming season, the minimum acceptable win total for Wilcox is 10 wins. Anything less and Wilcox should be shown the exit. Enough of this 6-6 and 5-7 crap.
Rushinbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

calumnus said:

Pittstop said:

6956bear said:

calumnus said:

Strykur said:

calumnus said:

HearstMining said:

Since 2021, Wilcox has averaged 4+ losses per season where the other team has scored >28 points. So, I don't know where he gets this "scoring 28 pts should be enough" philosophy. He must think a string of 7-5 or 8-4 seasons will get him a contract extension because that's what he's aiming for.

People here are "demanding" 7 or 8 wins this season. While I think it is critical that we move on to a smarter, more competitive, more charismatic, offensive minded coach, I have my doubts as to whether we would really fire him if he wins 7 or 8, despite the fact he would almost certainly own the Cal record for conference losses.

Let's get real, after the crap we saw last year, and against this year's schedule, retaining him after a 7-5 2025 would signal that this program is not serious about sticking around the major college football scene and will be kicked out of the club once the super league starts, we have maybe a few dozen games left to change that notion and we have no time to dither as to what our intentions are.


Agreed, but say he goes 8-4? Does that really change things? Does he get retained then? And if so, do we go into year 10 of Wilcox with him only having one year left on his contract? Or does that get him an extension?

I don't see the clear path forward here.

It feels like we are just prolonging the inevitable, spending a lot of money increasing the staff trying to prop him up when time is running out.

I agree retaining Wilcox was a mistake. But I am pretty strongly convinced he will be not be the HC in 2026. When Rivera was actually put in charge it was really late in the game to change the HC. So for now he evaluates Wilcox and the staff. Observes the college football landscape which is different than the NFL. And fundraises to set up the next HC with a chance to win.

Rivera has a big job putting into place everything else that a strong football program needs to win. That is a big job here. For now we have to trust Rivera and Lyons that they know what needs to be done. And that it does not include Wilcox beyond this season.

8-4 and another mid tier or less bowl game should not suffice. IMO only an ACC championship gets him to 2026. And no extensions. At least not one that increases the buyout.

I believe the Cal HC job could be attractive if the other pieces are in place. One good season does not make you a strong program. You need to have the pieces in place to do that annually. People fear that removing Wilcox after a good season would hurt their prospects for attracting a strong HC. I disagree with that. Good coaches want a chance to win. If under Rivera/Lyons the program has the structure in place to win they can attract a good coach to lead the team. Good coaches know what that looks like.

But yes time is running out. We can only hope there is enough time to change the narrative around Cal football.


My belief is that RR is going about things the right way. I don't think he would assume a position like FB GM and just start indiscriminately taking a meat ax to the on-field product. I think he has gone about it appropriately by eliminating 'infrastructure inefficiencies' (like Bloesch, Gilbert, AT, & Burl, on O, and 'moving on from Sirmon - regardless of how it was framed - and Tre Brown on D) and building out that part of the infrastructure with quality, proven coaches and leaders; investing in recruiting staff and enhancing the recruiting operation and implementing an actual recruiting plan/approach/model; eliminating any program confusion, ambiguity, and apathy/absence of commitment related to leadership and who is driving the car; being in charge of identifying (with appropriate input from coaches and recruiting leadership) where NIL/Revenue Share dollars should best be allocated. And now that all of the broad infrastructure is 'mostly' in place - and no viable, or lack-of-institutional-support excuses remain - RR has time during his 1st season as FB GM to thoroughly evaluate and consider "JW replacement options" and avoid the knee-jerk, unprepared, willy-nilly emergency [interim] HC appointment we witnessed take place down on The Farm. When he replaces the HC it will be done "the right way", like the professional that he is.

Ron Rivera was not responsible for ANY of those personnel changes. Most happened before he was named GM, long before he was "given the keys" and none happened with his input. It was Wilcox/Harsin. Rivera is spending this year "observing" and advising but if he was going to recommend firing people walking in the door he would replace them with people he has connections to (Toler was one) maybe NFL people, and not people Wilcox/Harsin have connections to.



You don't know that. Ron "had the keys" from the moment he accepted the job. Most of you just refused to take Sebasta's and Greg's word for it. You needed some kind of proof, like the immediate beheading of JK. Ron will evaluate who will be the best HC candidate for Cal and, more importantly, the 'best HC' for Cal. He has a very deep rolodex from years of professional networking contacts and personal working relationships and NFL Winter Meetings, and Scouting Combines attended, as well as hirings and firings within his own NFL staffs over 13 seasons as an NFL HC, and DC before that. It will not necessarily be a Cal alum. Likely not. It definitely will not be Burl. He's never even been an OC, and has never called a play or designed an offense or a game plan, or a practice plan.

You have it wrong. Sebasta was very vocal about withholding his NIL contribution until he was assured Rivera was given the keys because he believed he had not been. That was long after the personnel changes. Moreover, there is absolutely no way Ron Rivera comes in and immediately pushes out fellow Cal alum and Cal legacy Burl Toler and alienates the entire Toler family (all Cal alums) and all their Cal alumni friends in Berkeley and the East Bay in order to bring in a WR coach that worked for Harsin in the past? That was all Harsin.


Not trying to speak for Sebasta by any means, and I remember well his leadership in the campaign to withold further financial support from the program until Lyons made it unequivocally clear that Ron had total control of fb by both clarifying that JW was HIS
direct report, and by resolving the JK situation that contiinuesd to hang like a spectre over the fb program and undermine confidence in the new structure. Nevertheless it was stated early, by Sebasta and others - including Ron himself - that "Ron had the keys". But ultimately as the JK shadow persisted, and constant doubts were expressed daily on here and on TOS, I believe that Sebasta felt he needed to press the action to the middle of the table - to exert the maximum leverage at his disposal - to erase all doubt, and all the naysayers, and to assuage the concerns of all of the 'would be' and 'might be' donors who remained on the sidelines until they could be absolutely , unequivocally sure. But that doesn't mean that it wasn't so all the time. It's just that Ron's initial word and Sebasta's initial word, based on what he obviously understood, and relayed to us up front, wasn't good enough. And next steps ultimately had to be taken. That is basically my recollection of the entire process. Sebasta can correct me if I am misstating the correct chronology.


Sebasta said essentially "I'm not speaking for others or telling them what to do, but I am withholding my money until Ron is given the keys."

And again, Toler, a Cal alum that Rivera knows and has worked with in California Legends as our best recruiter, was replaced by Cefalo, a WR coach from Utah State who worked with Harsin at two other stops (Boise State and Arkansas State) and was named on December 13, 2024 according to Calbears.com. That is three days after Harsin was named OC but 4 months before Rivera was even named GM in late March 2025 and 7 months before Rivera was "given the keys" in June 2025, with Knowlton announcing his "retirement" later that same month.
All the personnel changes have been Wilcox/Harsin.


I keep hearing - from a few isolated corners of BI - that "Burl was our best recruiter". WHO has he ever recruited that was a legitimate 4 or 5 star recruit? And of those [ostensibly] borderline 4-star wrs he recruited (and before that he was a rb coach), which ones did he ever develop, coach up, or otherwise 'improve', to a level of talent, skill, or proficiency where an NFL team was even remotely interested enough to commit even a 'Mr. Irrelevant'- level draft pick for? Please, remind me.

Wilcox has had zero high school recruits drafted, and all our drafted players have been on defense, almost all DBs. He has had a staff of poor recruiters, but our best recruiting has been at WR and DB, with a nod to RB recently. OL, DL, and QB recruiting has been terrible.

There is a lot more to an offense than the WRs, but we landed more 4 star talent there than any other position, offense or defense. We have been consistently the worse offense on our conference under Wilcox, but have repeatedly had freshman star WRs who departed for greener pastures after big freshman years under Toler. Nyziah Hunter is just the latest.

The only player Toler coached that got drafted was KeeSean Johnson when Toler was WR coach for his old college coach, Jeff Tedford at Fresno State. Though I bet Hunter will get drafted.

Toler has coached 7 players that made NFL rosters, including Patrick Laird when he was RB coach. Laird was a revelation, but a lot of credit goes to Toler for giving him the carries despite being a walk-on. More recently, Toler found the Jet, Javan Thomas. 4.0 student from Oakland. Prototypical Cal football player. Similarly Toler had a WR at UC Davis that lead FCS in receiving and made the NFL. Context matters.

No we haven't had a Desean Jackson or Keenan Allen, but if we had a good offense, Toler would give us a good shot at landing one. However, maybe another charismatic alum like Geoff McArthur? People here now realize that having a Polynesian OL coach from Hawaii helps us land Polynesian kids including from Hawaii (something long known by most of the top programs on the West Coast who have long had Polynesian OL and DL coaches). Well, I assert it is good for recruiting African American players from LA and the East Bay to have an African American from California on the offensive staff. A Cal alum, even better. A Cal alum, in a big family of Cal alums, spread throughout the state that can make recruits and their families feel like family? I don't think it was smart of Harsin to fire him on day 1 without understanding that, but maybe that is just me.


maybe harsin did understand that. just sayin'.
ducktilldeath
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Every single advanced metric, and even the basic ones tell us one thing: "Explosive plays win games." I'll try to dig it up, but there was an article published last year, early in the season, that the team that had more explosive plays(however defined) won the game something like 90% of the time. Winning that battle is more important than winning the turnover battle!!!(based on one article 1/3 of the way through last year).
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Two comments within this thread are driving me up a wall:

#1) "Wilcox has had zero high school recruits drafted". This is true, but man, what an indication of how far Cal has fallen!! I can go back as far as Marv Levy, and I can't think of a Cal HC who hasn't had SOMEBODY drafted that they recruited from HS, even if it was after that HC was fired. This is incredible!
#2) A paraphrase: "Due to Cal's weak 2025 schedule, Cal needs to win 10 games for Wilcox to keep his job." OK, so he wins 10 games with an extremely weak schedule. Does anybody think he'll win 10 games in 2026 when the schedule is tougher? Will Wilcox's shortcomings suddenly have evaporated?

People looking for a parallel to Wilcox should look at Oregon HC Rich Brooks. Brooks was HC for 16 seasons of mostly losing football before taking advantage of a weak year in the Pac 10 and going to the Rose Bowl in 1995. He parlayed that into an unsuccessful two season stint coaching the NFL Arizona Cardinals followed by seven mostly losing seasons coaching Kentucky. After that Rose Bowl season, he absolutely reverted to form, and so will Wilcox. If Cal wants to make the cut with the next round of conference consolidations, and the money can be found to buy Wilcox out, there is no reason on God's Green Earth why he should be kept around after 2025.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.