BearlyCareAnymore said:
calumnus said:
BearlyCareAnymore said:
calumnus said:
BearlyCareAnymore said:
CalGrad95 said:
Got our ass beat like a drum by a 2-5 team. Junior varsity coaching staff. Fire them all.
People keep talking about the fear of being relegated on the next realignment. The more I watch this conference, the more I'm convinced we have already been relegated. This conference is absolutely crap that needs 17 teams to put together 3 or 4 serviceable ones. These last two games have been horrible on both sides and brutal to watch.
The ACC is still considered P4, pays well, is an ESPN darling and the fact the teams are so bad just highlights what an opportunity we are squandering with Wilcox. We only needed to be around the #50 team to win 10 last year. This year's schedule is even worse. Win 10 and make the CFPs, even as a fraud, and start filling CMS, recruiting at a high level and actually become good (ie fake it till you make it). Then win in the CFP and make it to the B1G or a Superleague in the next realignment. The path is right there. SMU made that jump from G6, we can too.
There is no P4. People are already referring to the P2.
The crap teams in the ACC pushed for Cal, Stanford and SMU over the objections of the good teams because they know the good teams are leaving and with the three of us there are enough teams to maintain a conference that is substantially worse than the P2 but somewhat better than the G?
Yes, but people expect the P2 to expand again and when they do they will take the best teams/markets from the ACC and Big-12. That is why we need to win in the ACC, become one of their best teams, become regularly ranked by virtue of beating bad teams in the ACC and own the Bay Area market. The B1G presidents also like academics. We are perfectly positioned for B1G expansion if we take care of business. The path is right there. Worst case if we try is we own the ACC and remain ESPN's darling while filling CMS, ie Cal football survives at a relatively high level.
OH FOR GOD'S SAKE. They aren't going to expand that much and they aren't taking us win or lose. We won't bring them more money and that is all that matters. There are a handful of teams, mostly the top teams in the ACC, who have something to add to the P2. They aren't us. They don't care if we miraculously win a couple time in 60 years. They care about prolonged, sustained ability to add value to a conference.
The Big 10 doesn't need to expand AT ALL. They may take a couple specific teams like Notre Dame who clearly add value. They don't need to go looking for numbers. We aren't going anywhere and it is time people make there peace with that.
We usually agree on our analysis of whatvis, but differ greatly in our vision of what can be.
No one knows for sure what the future holds but no one thinks the current conferences remain as is. Maybe there is expansion, maybe there is a super league, but the bottom line is Cal needs to start being the best version of Cal it can be to give us the best chance of surviving what the future brings.
I truly believe Cal has tremendous potential to compete at the highest level (consistent top 20) and fill CMS and Haas by filling the East Bay sports void but we need to think strategically and identify our comparitive advantages and play to them, which we have never really done in football (the Calgorithm and our Game Day atmosphere came close) and have only done to a limited extent on occasion in basketball.
If you don't believe we can do better than this and want to give up, fine. But why oppose those who believe it can be done and try to stop Cal from trying? Why try to convince the crowd it is pointless? I don't get that. Just make excuses for Wilcox then and say we should retain him for next year.