oski003 said:
GMP said:
oski003 said:
oski003 said:
GMP said:
oski003 said:
He is 26. Bitter much? Yes, all of the guys I named have the potential to be MVP caliber.
Gavin Lux is the number two prospect in ALL OF BASEBALL, you moron.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.mlb.com/amp/news/ranking-2020-mlb-rookies-by-future-value.html
Let's check in on young Lux, shall we?
OPS+ of 45. lollllllllll.
Let's check in on young Lux, shall we?
OPS+ of 121 in 2022. lollllllllll.
Lux, Gonsolin, Urias, and Will Smith are doing an epic job leading the dodgers to dominance. Giants suck balls.
A nice article on Gavin Lux. OPS is now 124.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/mlb/dodgers-news-la-insider-makes-bold-claim-about-gavin-lux/ar-AA10JVz3?li=BBnbfcL
Which is far from MVP caliber.
Which is far from an OPS+ of 45. My point was that the dodgers had/have prospects with mvp potential. Your point was the giants have a stacked farm system and the dodgers are getting old. Your points arent aging well and will continue to do so.
Interestingly, I think my points have been proven correct, in part, by the moves the Dodgers have made. Two years ago, I looked at the Dodgers roster. I suggested they were headed for a downturn in their roster and also said that a farm system can't be counted on to completely revamp things because prospects do miss.
They let Seager walk, as I suggested they would. Turner and Muncy are having down years and very well could be on the downside of their careers. Bellinger is, surprisingly, bad and has been for 3 years now. This is all in line with what I suggested that made you so angry. (The rotation, however, is mostly homegrown and very good.)
It seems the Dodgers brass saw the same things. If you look at their roster now, two of their three best players were not on the team 13 months ago - Trea Turner, Freddie Freeman. And if you back a bit further than that, you can include their best player (Mookie Betts), too.
This is not a knock on the Dodgers brass. They saw the same writing on the wall that I did and they used their resources and prospects to reload. Good for them. But if you think you have been proven right and I have been proven wrong, I strongly disagree.
Edit:
Here's the post I am referring to:
GMP:
Quote:
Indeed I have. Have you? The average age of the Dodgers' eleven players with the most at bats this year (no one else had over 100): 28.5. In 2022, that would be 30.5. We now know players peak around 26 (people used to think 28).
The pipeline is actually pretty dry for hitters other than Lux (and Lux has certainly not proven himself with a career OPS+ of 74, which is 26% below league average) in 582 plate appearances.
By 2022, Turner will be gone, or 37. Many expect Seager will be gone. Other than Lux, Smith, and Bellinger, every current regular will be either gone or 29-30, if not well into their 30s.
The same goes for the pitching. They have one Top 100 prospect (Gray) who many see as hit or miss. Other than that, from every pitcher with more than 10 IP this year, the average age is 28. In 2022, it'll be 30. May and Buehler should be good. But Urias has a long injury history and no one else on the current roster projects as a starter. The rotation looks in better shape to me than the lineup, but there will still be a lot of question marks in 2022.
Fans think these things last forever. They don't. This run is already approximately 4 years in, if not longer. They've got 2, maybe 3 years left.
Edit: This is not to say they can't or won't fill these holes. They can. But it's no guarantee.
They did fill them!