BEWARE of MacIntyre, Dykes and Andersen

13,221 Views | 85 Replies | Last: 13 yr ago by BerlinerBaer
mvargus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear;842004894 said:

Well you were acquitted in the sense that we gave Tedford a lot of room to improve, whereas you saw it (that Tedford was not the future anymore) right away. It has been a waste of a few years but probably Tedford built up enough goodwill in the first half of his tenure to deserve some time. But now the time is more than up.


I complete understood how people felt. I remember back then and I know that part of why I was so angry in my posts was that I was screaming defiance into a storm of support built on the goodwill Tedford had generated in 2004 and 2006.

The funny thing is that today I can't put a finger on what I was seeing that got me started on wanting Tedford gone. Admittedly, I hated that he kept sending out Longshore in 2007 when anyone watching the games could see that Longshore wasn't able to step into his passes. The INT against UCLA that was returned for a TD was a perfect example of how much the injury affected Longshore, but Tedford kept relying on the coachspeak argument of "He gives us the best chance to win games."

But I can't say that it was jsut that which got me to leave the Tedford fan train. There have been many things over the year that have disappointed me with his coaching.
mvargus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our Domicile;842004866 said:

You can interview anybody you want. Who cares how many.

However, if hired as HC, Sonny Dykes himself could be leaving Cal early if the Texas Tech job opened up (let's say Tommy Tuberville eventually retired or burned out or got ran out of town).

His father -- Spike Dykes -- is regarded as a Legend in Lubbock so his current/future HC jobs could just be considered training grounds until the son is ready to head back to Texas Tech.

That "Red Raider" mystique is taken serious by some folks in Texas and I could see Sonny coaching there one day as the returning son of the famous Red Raider HC.


If we live in fear of a coach leaving after a couple years, we'll never find a coach. Right now most coaches still see the positoin of NFL head coach as the holy grail of the profession and the few who don't want to go to the NFL would still jump to the SEC or Notre Dame if offered the position.

Right now with the level of tarnish on the Cal brand we need to get an up-and-coming coach who can bring the program back to 9-3 respectability quickly. If we get 3-4 decent seasons and then he jobs we'll still likely have a firmer foundation upon which to pursue the next coach. Right now we are going to be a bit like beggars at the gate. The program has a ton of potential, but the recent lack of success obscures it a bit.
HaasBear04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doeren? Dykes? Mcintyre? They all seem pretty small time to me. Whats the point of shelling out 7 million to jettison poncho boy to hire some B player? Especially when the likes of arizona and ucla can land rich rod and mora? Might as well keep the poncho another year.
tommie317
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everyone comes from somewhere
SRBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A little tidbit on Doeren, who does seem pretty interesting as a candidate.

http://coachingsearch.com/home/1716-dave-doeren-if-something-comes-along-im-going-to-listen-to-it.html
Our Domicile
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tommie317;842004915 said:

Everyone comes from somewhere




Holy Double Rainbow, Batman!
ManBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HaasBear04;842004910 said:

Doeren? Dykes? Mcintyre? They all seem pretty small time to me. Whats the point of shelling out 7 million to jettison poncho boy to hire some B player? Especially when the likes of arizona and ucla can land rich rod and mora? Might as well keep the poncho another year.


Remarkably shortsighted.
WhipItOutJoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HaasBear04;842004910 said:

Doeren? Dykes? Mcintyre? They all seem pretty small time to me. Whats the point of shelling out 7 million to jettison poncho boy to hire some B player? Especially when the likes of arizona and ucla can land rich rod and mora? Might as well keep the poncho another year.


MacIntyre has a nice rsum with experience at an academic school (Duke) and has done wonders at San Jose State. Before you dismiss him I suggest you read his bio -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_MacIntyre


MacIntyre would then spend five seasons in the NFL starting in 2003: as the defensive backs coach of the Dallas Cowboys under Bill Parcells until 2006, then in 2007 in the same position with the New York Jets. In 2008, Mike MacIntyre returned to college football as the defensive coordinator for Duke, and in his first season with Duke, the Blue Devils allowed 67.4 fewer yards and 9.8 fewer points per game than in 2007.[11] In 2009, the American Football Coaches Association recognized MacIntyre as FBS Assistant Coach of the Year.[12]
[edit]San Jose State head coach (2010present)
[edit]2010
On December 16, 2009, MacIntyre became the new head coach of the San Jose State Spartans football team, a member of the Western Athletic Conference (WAC), after Dick Tomey retired.[13] The Spartans had just come off a 210 record in 2009 and had only three winning seasons since 1993, and athletic director Tom Bowen planned on making a full 85 scholarship athletes available to the football team, as Academic Progress Rate penalties limited yearly scholarships to between 67 and 72.[14][15]
Local media considered MacIntyre to be a smart hire despite his inexperience as a head coach.[14] MacIntyre has stated that he chose to be the head coach to inspire success in the student-athletes and praised his father George MacIntyre for improving the struggling football programs Tennessee-Martin and Vanderbilt as coach.[16] He also planned on dropping the spread offense and expand recruiting rather than rely on junior college transfers.[15] San Jose State completed the 2010 season 112.[17] However, MacIntyre expressed optimism that the team would improve in 2011 given that the team would have 85 athletes on scholarship next season.[18]
[edit]2011
In 2011, the Spartans finished 57.[19] Unlike the previous season in which MacIntyre had only six weeks of recruiting time, MacIntyre had a full term of recruiting.[20] The coach also commented shortly before the first game of 2011 that his players benefited by learning his playbook throughout 2010 despite the one-win season.[21] Then with the longest losing streak of Division I football, the Spartans lost 13 games in a row starting in 2010 until beating New Mexico State on September 24, 2011.[22] San Jose State averaged 190 rushing yards per game by then, a marked improvement from years past. San Jose Mercury News columnist Jon Wilner credited MacIntyre's experience coaching in the SEC, a conference Wilner wrote was "all about running between the tackles."[23]
The next week, San Jose State won its second in a row and ended a 16-game road losing streak with a 3831 victory over Colorado State; that win marked the first time since 2008 San Jose State won two consecutive games and first non-conference win since 2002.[24] San Jose State's homecoming game on October 14, 2011 was nationally televised as part of ESPN's College Football Friday Primetime, and San Jose State rallied to beat Hawaii 2827, the team's third win in four games.[25] That win led to speculation that San Jose State would qualify for a bowl game.[26][27]
[edit]2012
mvargus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HaasBear04;842004910 said:

Doeren? Dykes? Mcintyre? They all seem pretty small time to me. Whats the point of shelling out 7 million to jettison poncho boy to hire some B player? Especially when the likes of arizona and ucla can land rich rod and mora? Might as well keep the poncho another year.


Why demand an A list coach? Rich Rod and Mora were both unemployed in 2011, and not because they decided they wanted a year off from coaching. They had failed with their last teams.

Another good example of what can be found is Harbaugh. I remember the posts on this board about him when he was hired. So many here were full of glee that Stanford had gone to a little known Div II school to find a coach.

But Harbuagh proved to be a hell of a coach. Far better than the A-listers Erickson and Stoops who were brought in by Zona and ASU at around the same time.

Cal needs to find a coach who wants to rebuild a program that has a great foundation, but has struggled the last 3 years and is defintiely losing a lot of its luster with recruits despite the great facilities. In my mind that means a young coach who hasn't become jaded because he's been in the BCS trenches for 20+ years.
Our Domicile
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WhipItOutJoe;842004923 said:

MacIntyre has a nice rsum with experience at an academic school (Duke) and has done wonders at San Jose State. Before you dismiss him I suggest you read his bio -






I dismissed him because he coaches in the watered-down WAC (no Boise, Nevada or Fresno State this year), a fact that no one here seems to acknowledge, and I believe that has exaggerated his success at SJSU.
HaasBear04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, my initial protest aside, this is a nice discussion about realistic candidates. Now someone just needs to remind sandy not to grab her ankles with such alacrity during buyout clause negotiations.
mvargus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HaasBear04;842004931 said:

Well, my initial protest aside, this is a nice discussion about realistic candidates. Now someone just needs to remind sandy not to grab her ankles with such alacrity during buyout clause negotiations.


Sandy should have never gotten involved in extension negotiations back in 2008. I know it was done based on the idea that Tedford could still bolt for another team, but after the 2005 and especially the 2007 meltdowns Tedford was hardly a hot commodity by that point.

Sandy panicked at the idea of losing Tedford before the ground was broken on the SAHPC and negotiated a contract that was massively tilted to Tedford's benefit.

And the university is now paying for that panic.
HaasBear04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That said....think about it, the names coming up in this thread; would they be longshots for this program back in 2001? I dont think so. So, eleven years, some nut bowls and half a billion dollars later, has this job become any more attractive?
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our Domicile;842004929 said:

I dismissed him because he coaches in the watered-down WAC (no Boise, Nevada or Fresno State this year), a fact that no one here seems to acknowledge, and I believe that has exaggerated his success at SJSU.


I definitely mentioned in my original post that MacIntyre doing all of this winning in the WAC is definitely a big minus in my book. Plus, the one shot he got against a good WAC team (utah state) they got trounced at home.

I think anyone who is really considering MacIntyre needs to watch a SJ State game and then ask themselves; is there anything really specific they like about MacIntyre's coaching? - or is David Fales basically carrying that team and making Mac look good?

We all know that a good QB (or in our case an all-world QB) can hide a lot of deficiencies with the coach.
goldenjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gary Andersen is not leaving utah state. I can gaurantee that.
BerlinerBaer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice post, Ducky. You make some good arguments, although it isn't hard to raise counterpoints that actually indicate these are good candidates.

ducky23;842004789 said:

Mike MacIntyre: Current SJ State HC. Previous records of 1-12, 5-7. Now 8-2. Why the turnaround? MacIntyre brought in a new QB named David Fales, who most believe is the best QB SJ State has ever seen. So was it MacIntyre who is turning around SJ State or is Fales SJ State's version of AR? Another problem with Mac is that they play in the WAC. Their most impressive win was over Navy and they lost both of their games against legitimate competition (although stanford game was close, they got blown out at home against Utah State).


MacIntyre was named the scout.com WAC recruiter of the year for a reason. He's brought talent to SJSU, which is extremely important in sustaining success. It just seems a little contrived to claim that he isn't an effective coach just because he has one really good player. There are probably several good players on that team.

Quote:

Gary Andersen: Current Utah State HC. Previous records of 4-8, 4-8, 7-6. Current record of 8-2. Why the turnaround? Enter soph QB Chuckie Keeton who will most likely break every Utah St. QB record once he is done. So again, was it Andersen who turned around the program? Or is Andersen closer to being a 4-8 coach with an all-world QB? Andersen also has the misfortune of playing in the WAC, although they do have decent wins over Utah and SJ state and had close losses to BYU and Wisconsin.


A big feather in the cap of Anderson was that he was Utah's DC during their undefeated year when they beat Alabama in the Sugar Bowl. They had Andy Ludwig as OC, and any Ute fan will tell you that the team won in spite of his offense. Keeton is good, but USU's defense carries the team, IMO. He would do well with our talent.

Quote:

Sonny Dykes: Current Louisiana Tech HC. Previous records of 5-7, 8-5. Current record of 9-1. Good wins over Illinois, Houston and Virginia. Impressive two point loss to Texas A&M. So why the turnaround? Enter Colby Cameron, who set an NCAA record for not throwing an INT in 358 pass attempts. He is also a dark horse Heisman candidate. With Dykes, I think you could make the argument that its his system that makes his QB's so good. But Dykes didn't score the amount of points or have the same level of QB play last year (with a different QB). So is it Cameron or Dykes? I think the jury is still out.


Dykes has a history of good offenses. Before Foles he was able to do good things with Tuitama at Arizona. I disagree that LA Tech's success is merely the result of just one good player. As is the case with MacIntyre, you need to give the coach credit for bringing in players that can win. I agree that he would need a good DC to be successful at Cal.

Quote:

Who I would like to see (if we can't land Petersen) is Dave Doeren who is currently the HC at Northern Illinois.


I also agree that Doeren is a great candidate. We are in good shape if we can land any of these 4. If I had to rank them it put it as Dykes > Anderson > Doeren > MacIntyre. MacIntyre gets a leg up by being in the area already.
slider643
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I really like Tim DeRuyter at Fresno State.

He's a strong defensive coach and would be a great asset against all of the offensive systems in the Pac. He did well at A&M playing primarily spread teams in the Big 12. He did very well at Air Force where he was outmanned in almost every game. He also runs a 3-4, which would fit nicely with how we have recruited on the defensive side of the ball. And he's a west coast guy from Long Beach (not that I think it should matter, but it definitely doesn't hurt).

There are a lot of successful offensive systems, each with many disciples who can bring in a system with them as OC. IMO, there are far fewer successful defensive systems so a good defensive coach is a much rarer commodity. I would rather we give the HC position to one of those defensive coaches who can then bring in an up and coming OC to run the offense.
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
slider643;842004988 said:

I really like Tim DeRuyter at Fresno State.

He's a strong defensive coach and would be a great asset against all of the offensive systems in the Pac. He did well at A&M playing primarily spread teams in the Big 12. He did very well at Air Force where he was outmanned in almost every game. He also runs a 3-4, which would fit nicely with how we have recruited on the defensive side of the ball. And he's a west coast guy from Long Beach (not that I think it should matter, but it definitely doesn't hurt).

There are a lot of successful offensive systems, each with many disciples who can bring in a system with them as OC. IMO, there are far fewer successful defensive systems so a good defensive coach is a much rarer commodity. I would rather we give the HC position to one of those defensive coaches who can then bring in an up and coming OC to run the offense.


At this point I'll take a guy who acknowledges that we should give Bigelow the rock and get out the way. It's gotten that bad.
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoldenYears;842004993 said:

Most people have been barely able to acknowledge we need a new head coach before this year, let alone pick someone that they would want to be that coach.


In the past, some of us envisioned Pete Carroll returning to the Bay Area.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2006Bear;842005139 said:

I heard Mike MacIntyre wants to turn every Cal fan into a Socialist.

According to most, there'd be only about five of us to convert.
HungryCalBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Awesome! Sign him up.

I like his discussion on the Special Team philosophy too. They put the best 11 players on that team instead of seeing the ST as a stepping stone for freshmen and sophomores.
OneKeg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good thought, Ducky. I like it.

While a big name coach would help from a PR perspective, winning is the best PR. Paying less for a "small time" coach that wins could be the best of all worlds in the long run, even if the initial draw was less.

Man I just checked Sagarin and Northern Illinois would be favored over Cal by more than a TD this season on a neutral field... sigh.
N0rCalBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dave Doeren sounds like a great pick! I'm legitimately excited about a candidate for the first time (besides the dream of Chris Petersen).
TheOldToe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
N0rCalBear;842005287 said:

Dave Doeren sounds like a great pick! I'm legitimately excited about a candidate for the first time (besides the dream of Chris Petersen).

Ditto.Starting to shy away from MacIntyre if the bible study thing is true.That bugs me a little.Good points above about having the right QB.Fresno State has been kicking ass this year with Pat Hill's recruits.Those guys are coached up.My opts.Doeren,DeRuyter,MacIntrye
SoCalBear323
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Davidson;842004821 said:

Sonny Dykes, make it so.

That offense they run would be perfect for us. We can finally put some points on the board win games. Don't give that crap about weak conference. Dykes will have better athletes on offense @ CAL to go against the better defenses.

Plus, they put 57 points on Texas A&M with their guys. You know, the same Texas A&M that runs the same offense that beat some team ranked #1 this past weekend?


This. Dykes is my fav plan B guy in case we don't get Chris Petersen ::snork::
staygolden2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dave Doeren sounds like a promising young coach.

My only reservation with him is that he's coached for just two seasons and he inherited an 11-3 team from the prior year.

I still think he's one of the best candidates that we have a chance of landing........and I must say, a defensive minded coach is kind of intriguing.

Cheers
Tree Cutter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
slider643;842004988 said:

I really like Tim DeRuyter at Fresno State.

He's a strong defensive coach and would be a great asset against all of the offensive systems in the Pac. He did well at A&M playing primarily spread teams in the Big 12. He did very well at Air Force where he was outmanned in almost every game. He also runs a 3-4, which would fit nicely with how we have recruited on the defensive side of the ball. And he's a west coast guy from Long Beach (not that I think it should matter, but it definitely doesn't hurt).

There are a lot of successful offensive systems, each with many disciples who can bring in a system with them as OC. IMO, there are far fewer successful defensive systems so a good defensive coach is a much rarer commodity. I would rather we give the HC position to one of those defensive coaches who can then bring in an up and coming OC to run the offense.


Yup, my thoughts exactly. With the number of spread-option offenses in the Pac-12, we're gonna need a defense or, coaching staff that can counter this trend. Kirby Smart's defense took a hit when TAMU and Johnny Football came to Tuscaloosa last week. Haven't seen DeRuyter against spread teams but, his defenses at Air Force were very good and at A&M, had alumni salivating about the old 'Wrecking Crew' days. I would add him to my short list.

Kirby Smart
James Franklin
Pete Lembo
Dave Dueren
Tim DeRuyter
Al Golden
SmellinRoses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great post Ducky - any thoughts on the Vandy coach...?
AzureBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This Saturday's Utah St. (Gary Andersen) vs. Louisiana Tech (Sonny Dykes) game should be required viewing by Sandy Barbour and those speculating about the new coach. It's on ESPN3 at 4pm EST. Should be a good one.
txwharfrat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23;842004789 said:

Three names that keep popping up are Mike MacIntyre, Sonny Dykes and Gary Andersen. All three have extremely similar track records. They are all having career seasons after several mediocre seasons beforehand. Is this a sign that these coaches are program builders who have finally turned around their teams after several mediocre seasons prior? Or are their current seasons a flash in the pan? Lets look closer.

Mike MacIntyre: Current SJ State HC. Previous records of 1-12, 5-7. Now 8-2. Why the turnaround? MacIntyre brought in a new QB named David Fales, who most believe is the best QB SJ State has ever seen. So was it MacIntyre who is turning around SJ State or is Fales SJ State's version of AR? Another problem with Mac is that they play in the WAC. Their most impressive win was over Navy and they lost both of their games against legitimate competition (although stanford game was close, they got blown out at home against Utah State).

Gary Andersen: Current Utah State HC. Previous records of 4-8, 4-8, 7-6. Current record of 8-2. Why the turnaround? Enter soph QB Chuckie Keeton who will most likely break every Utah St. QB record once he is done. So again, was it Andersen who turned around the program? Or is Andersen closer to being a 4-8 coach with an all-world QB? Andersen also has the misfortune of playing in the WAC, although they do have decent wins over Utah and SJ state and had close losses to BYU and Wisconsin.

Sonny Dykes: Current Louisiana Tech HC. Previous records of 5-7, 8-5. Current record of 9-1. Good wins over Illinois, Houston and Virginia. Impressive two point loss to Texas A&M. So why the turnaround? Enter Colby Cameron, who set an NCAA record for not throwing an INT in 358 pass attempts. He is also a dark horse Heisman candidate. With Dykes, I think you could make the argument that its his system that makes his QB's so good. But Dykes didn't score the amount of points or have the same level of QB play last year (with a different QB). So is it Cameron or Dykes? I think the jury is still out.

Bottom line, with all three coaches above, its possible that they have finally turned around their programs and they are now finally seeing the fruits of their labors. OR its equally possible that they are all riding the coattails of their Star QB's and their previous mediocre records are more indicative of their coaching level. I think Dykes may have the best argument, because he does have a unique offensive system, so maybe he is worth a look. The other two candidates?-way too short of a track record and way too many question marks. Especially the big red flag that they both have all-star QB's right now and have not won prior.

-----------------------------------------
Who I would like to see (if we can't land Petersen) is Dave Doeren who is currently the HC at Northern Illinois. He's only had two seasons as the HC, but his last season he was 11-3. This season 9-1 with a narrow loss to Iowa in a game they probably should have won. He was previously the DC at Wisconsin back when their defenses were extremely stout, so he has big time coordinator experience. The big difference I see with Doeren when compared to the other coaches listed above is that he's had two good seasons in a row (not just one). And the most important part is that Doeren has done it with TWO different QB's. So its much more likely that Doeren's success has more to do with him than his QB's.

One other thing, for those worrying about our academics. His team is 9th in the NCAA in APR. Not sure how much that had to do with him (since he probably wasn't around for those years), but it shows he can coach at a school that places an emphasis on academics.

Lastly, I've linked a page that talks about his offensive and defense philosophies. I'd like to point a few things out from this page: http://www.niuhuskies.com/niu-football/our-game.html

"We do not run a ton of plays but we do believe in running them from a variety of looks. The end result is our players playing extremely fast and physical football."

"Our design is very simple, sound, and adjustable to the various looks we will see throughout the season from defensive teams."

"We will feature our playmakers"

"Once you are here we will modify our schemes to fit and feature our playmaker's abilities with the design. We are all about using our player's strength's and hiding our player's weaknesses."

These are all characteristics that Tedford DOES NOT have. Doeren is young, energetic and a great recruiter. He's going to get offers from some BCS schools this year (Purdue sounds like the primary suitor right now), but I think we are a more attractive destination than some of the middling Big Ten schools.

So assuming we go with the young up and coming coach, my preference is clearly Doeren. In my opinion, its too much of a risk to hire a coach who is having one career season with a star QB.


Have you done any research at all? You summarily diss Dykes as a one-year phenom. But your data points to something else. In each of his three years as a HC he has shown improvement leading up to this season. Plus, in his two years as Arizona OC he made Tuitama and Foles look amazing - leading AZ to a 2nd place P10 finish in 2009. Plus, his offense at Texas Tech prior to that was tremendous and kicked Tedford's ass in 2004 - even with Rodgers.

To claim he is a one-year-wonder is just unfounded and - quite frankly - moronic.
pappysghost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 your my hero! I really like the sound of Doeren. He's exactly what I'd be looking for. Successful coach at a smaller school ready to move up with a modern and flexible offensive philosophy. Could be the next Urban Meyer. Who knows? You want a guy who's proven he has the organizational and leadership skills required to be a head coach. You just never know if you hire a coordinator.

Lets get him in here for an interview and sign him up. He's got to take over recruiting right away. Will Tedford help with the transition or will he go AWOL?
Our Domicile
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pappysghost;842006773 said:

ducky23 your my hero! I really like the sound of Doeren. He's exactly what I'd be looking for. Successful coach at a smaller school ready to move up with a modern and flexible offensive philosophy. Could be the next Urban Meyer....



Dude, Doeren is a former DC, not an offensive coach, so I really don't know how a DC could be the "next Urban Meyer".

His current OC is Mike Dunbar who worked one year at Cal (2006). Maybe he's the reason for NIU's "modern and flexible offensive philosophy".
GB54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AzureBear;842006551 said:

This Saturday's Utah St. (Gary Andersen) vs. Louisiana Tech (Sonny Dykes) game should be required viewing by Sandy Barbour and those speculating about the new coach. It's on ESPN3 at 4pm EST. Should be a good one.


And the next week matches San Jose State vs LaTech in San Jose. Lots of dress rehearsals
AzureBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GB54;842006877 said:

And the next week matches San Jose State vs LaTech in San Jose. Lots of dress rehearsals

I hope that Cal's decision makers get some meeting time with Dykes during this visit.
pappysghost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, I saw he was a former DC, a little concern, but heck, if he subscribes to that offensive philosophy than I'm on board. He can bring Dunbear along. The two probably work great together, hence their success. I firmly believe if Cal makes those kinds of hires over the next 50 years we won't be devoid of a Rose Bowl. Cal needs to become an innovator in the football world, not a follower. We should try to establish a program that is coach independent, or at least, as independent as we can get. Nobody is going to stay forever. We need to establish a pattern of excellence. We need to have exacting standards for our players and our coaches. My vision for Cal football beyond being a top program is that it's entertaining and fun for both the fans and the players. It's innovative and creative, not stale. We need an inspiring vision and a great plan to take this program to new heights and get beyond hiring one coach after another hoping it will happen.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.