What I've seen in my limited observations of other schools that have gone to an Air Raid type offense, the fantasy value of individual WR's and RB's declines and the value of the individual QB increases, as the ball distribution for both possession and deep threat passes are distributed broadly across the roster.

Can anyone corroborate this, or help me understand examples why this wouldn't happen?

how many people play college FFB? don't you just pick a QB that gets like 9 TDs a game in some of the lower conferences in FBS?

As for your question, I don't think you can say RB and WR value go down because of two things.

1. offense gets off a lot more plays
2. offense scores a lot of points

this will offset any "spreading it around"

Davidson;842038727 said:

---

how many people play college FFB? don't you just pick a QB that gets like 9 TDs a game in some of the lower conferences in FBS?

---

This was the second year that I played CFFB, and I'm in a keeper league. Keenan Allen is gone so I don't have to worry about keeping him. And I'm planning on keeping Harper and Bigelow but will be curious to know how Harper's value in particular will be impacted.

Look at WASST for example, they had stud WRs one year who were duds the next. They also had a good young RB in Ricky Galvin who was marginalized by the spread offense and moved to WR where he disappeared on the depth chart.