What's your goff assessment thus far?

11,163 Views | 137 Replies | Last: 12 yr ago by Cal89
tommie317
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister;842212945 said:

You're right. I'm watching him play the Kings tonight. I apologize.


Lebron and Kobe are deity like, Klay is the 3rd or 4th best player on his own team. Keep watching the game and see if he becomes god any time soon.

No wonder you think Goff is awesome
freshfunk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What concerns me is that Goff doesn't looked like he's gotten any better since game 1. Yes, there are many factors to consider but, at the end of the day, I'm not seeing significant improvement.

Next year he won't have the freshman or first-year-in-the-system excuse. Even the OL and run game has seen minor improvements over the course of the season.

Maybe he'll improve over the off season. I won't discount that. I just don't have any confidence in that happening given the trajectory of the season.
MrBerkeley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought the Kline crowd was bad, but as the season has progressed, I realize the Goff crowd is even worse. It's like watching a high school offensive coordinator parent selfishly supporting their QB child by calling only passing plays and refusing to sit them. Cal football this season has been hijacked by a handful of fakes who call themselves fans of the team. The rest of the team, the fans, the university are being held hostage by excuses.

This is going to come off snarky but this is what I’ve been thinking as the season has progressed to this point.

#1 Goff starts the season.
Goff Supporter (GF) argument: Well, coaches decided Goff> Kline in practice. (Pretend this is why you support Goff)
My thoughts: Sure, we'll give Goff a shot. Coaches probably know better. (I thought at this time only Kline supporters blindly backed their candidates and Goff supporters were reasonable).

#2 Goff fumbles the ball.
GS argument: "It's because he's a freshman and is adjusting."
My thoughts: Fumbling? Well nerves I guess. You might be right, but I doubt it. Still isn't an excuse, maybe a reason, but not an excuse. W/e. I guess we have no choice but to trust the coaches.

#3 Goff has a good game.
GS argument: “See! Goff is amazing.”
My thoughts: We are super lucky to have Goff. If he develops, we will have a great future. I hope Kline sticks around for the sake of the team and continues to develop. Good to have a solid backup QB.

#4 Goff repeatedly has bad games, fumbles, and keeps throwing Longshore interceptions.
GS argument: "It's everyone else's fault but that of Goff (aka your kid or your friend's kid). The running backs suck. The O-line sucks. The defense sucks."
My thoughts: Yeah, they kind of suck. So does Goff... he keeps fumbling and throwing bad interceptions. Stop trying to argue otherwise. You're basically calling me stupid to my face when you say Goff doesn't have issues. It might be other stuff INCLUDING Goff but Goff is clearly PART of the problem.

#5 Goff continues to fumble…
GS argument: (Don't want to admit that you specifically want Goff to be the answer and so you go into flounder mode trying to defend the ridiculous fumbles and interceptions because you're butt hurt Goff isn't panning out.)

-"We won't win a game anyway" (WTF kind of excuse is this? So we fold the season to prepare for Goff our savior, aka your kid?)
-“Defense sucks” (How much do you despise my football IQ to tell me the offense sucks because the defense sucks. Yeah we might still lose. But last time I checked the offense is separate from the defense. Field position might be the only thing that matters but considering we go 3 and out starting on our 20, it’s NOT the defense why our offense sucks.)
-"We need Goff to start for next year to make the system work or give Goff more (and more! )practice (and more!)" to develop. (and more!)" (cause we really want our kid Goff to do well).
-"Kline is not the answer!" (that was from your heart and not from your head. you have little evidence to make that kind of assessment with your head)
-"Coaches said so." (How freaking convenient. You don't support Goff because the coaches support Goff. Who the F can't see through this **** already).
-"Support the program." (I support smokers by supporting them as they try to quit. Not by supporting their smoking. We are going the wrong direction and I reject this argument. We need to quit going the wrong way).

My thoughts: Look. I am sorry about your kid Goff not doing well. I have no idea if Kline will do better. I don’t have anything personal against either. However, the familiar “Kline is not the answer” response gives me the impression of the “just because” kind of reason one gives when you don’t want/ don’t care to know about other options. You have become worse than the Kline fan, or rather, you were always worse. You just pretended otherwise because things panned out your way from the start.

I care less about what Goff/Kline needs to get in the NFL. I am not a parent of either. I care about the team and about Cal. They are here to play for this team FIRST. If they play well, they will go to the NFL and they deserve it and I support it. But Goff isn't good enough RIGHT AT THIS MOMENT to be the declared starter for the rest of the season (and the next). Dykes is full of bullshit for this reason. Let’s throw away this season and the next one too. In Goff’s final season he will have an amazing resume of 1 billion yards and a **** ton of TDs so he can go to the NFL. Mission accomplished. WTF. If there was any objectivity in this, we would have started Kline already and if he had sucked, then we could have gone back to Goff. If Dykes doesn't take us to the Rose Bowl in 2 seasons, fire Sandy and Dykes. If Goff doesn’t pan out, fire Sandy and Dykes. Dykes chained his fate to the success of Goff.

You want me to emotionally invest in this bullshit season? I will not invest in some personal project for Dykes or his OC or Goff’s parents or Goff’s parent’s friends among the alumni. I don’t blame the student section for not showing up this game. That was a brilliant one fingered salute to shameless posters on this forum, the coaching staff, and the administration for despising everyone else. For people who say they want to win, I think it’s obvious that you want to win with your people, not win period. We are Egypt’s democratic movement… hijacked and going nowhere. I feel so helpless against this garbage. I'm not really upset about the season at all. I've seen bad seasons. But I am disgusted with the way the team is being handled. We're sunk with this captain and his supporters among the crew. They don't care if the program hits an iceberg as long as the captain's son gets his 50 hours of steering.
annarborbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MrBerkeley;842212998 said:

I thought the Kline crowd was bad, but as the season has progressed, I realize the Goff crowd is even worse. It's like watching a high school offensive coordinator parent selfishly supporting their QB child by calling only passing plays and refusing to sit them. Cal football this season has been hijacked by a handful of fakes who call themselves fans of the team. The rest of the team, the fans, the university are being held hostage by excuses.

This is going to come off snarky but this is what I've been thinking as the season has progressed to this point.

#1 Goff starts the season.
Goff Supporter (GF) argument: Well, coaches decided Goff> Kline in practice. (Pretend this is why you support Goff)
My thoughts: Sure, we'll give Goff a shot. Coaches probably know better. (I thought at this time only Kline supporters blindly backed their candidates and Goff supporters were reasonable).

#2 Goff fumbles the ball.
GS argument: "It's because he's a freshman and is adjusting."
My thoughts: Fumbling? Well nerves I guess. You might be right, but I doubt it. Still isn't an excuse, maybe a reason, but not an excuse. W/e. I guess we have no choice but to trust the coaches.

#3 Goff has a good game.
GS argument: "See! Goff is amazing."
My thoughts: We are super lucky to have Goff. If he develops, we will have a great future. I hope Kline sticks around for the sake of the team and continues to develop. Good to have a solid backup QB.

#4 Goff repeatedly has bad games, fumbles, and keeps throwing Longshore interceptions.
GS argument: "It's everyone else's fault but that of Goff (aka your kid or your friend's kid). The running backs suck. The O-line sucks. The defense sucks."
My thoughts: Yeah, they kind of suck. So does Goff... he keeps fumbling and throwing bad interceptions. Stop trying to argue otherwise. You're basically calling me stupid to my face when you say Goff doesn't have issues. It might be other stuff INCLUDING Goff but Goff is clearly PART of the problem.

#5 Goff continues to fumble
GS argument: (Don't want to admit that you specifically want Goff to be the answer and so you go into flounder mode trying to defend the ridiculous fumbles and interceptions because you're butt hurt Goff isn't panning out.)

-"We won't win a game anyway" (WTF kind of excuse is this? So we fold the season to prepare for Goff our savior, aka your kid?)
-"Defense sucks" (How much do you despise my football IQ to tell me the offense sucks because the defense sucks. Yeah we might still lose. But last time I checked the offense is separate from the defense. Field position might be the only thing that matters but considering we go 3 and out starting on our 20, it's NOT the defense why our offense sucks.)
-"We need Goff to start for next year to make the system work or give Goff more (and more! )practice (and more!)" to develop. (and more!)" (cause we really want our kid Goff to do well).
-"Kline is not the answer!" (that was from your heart and not from your head. you have little evidence to make that kind of assessment with your head)
-"Coaches said so." (How freaking convenient. You don't support Goff because the coaches support Goff. Who the F can't see through this **** already).
-"Support the program." (I support smokers by supporting them as they try to quit. Not by supporting their smoking. We are going the wrong direction and I reject this argument. We need to quit going the wrong way).

My thoughts: Look. I am sorry about your kid Goff not doing well. I have no idea if Kline will do better. I don't have anything personal against either. However, the familiar "Kline is not the answer" response gives me the impression of the "just because" kind of reason one gives when you don't want/ don't care to know about other options. You have become worse than the Kline fan, or rather, you were always worse. You just pretended otherwise because things panned out your way from the start.

I care less about what Goff/Kline needs to get in the NFL. I am not a parent of either. I care about the team and about Cal. They are here to play for this team FIRST. If they play well, they will go to the NFL and they deserve it and I support it. But Goff isn't good enough RIGHT AT THIS MOMENT to be the declared starter for the rest of the season (and the next). Dykes is full of bullshit for this reason. Let's throw away this season and the next one too. In Goff's final season he will have an amazing resume of 1 billion yards and a **** ton of TDs so he can go to the NFL. Mission accomplished. WTF. If there was any objectivity in this, we would have started Kline already and if he had sucked, then we could have gone back to Goff. If Dykes doesn't take us to the Rose Bowl in 2 seasons, fire Sandy and Dykes. If Goff doesn't pan out, fire Sandy and Dykes. Dykes chained his fate to the success of Goff.

You want me to emotionally invest in this bullshit season? I will not invest in some personal project for Dykes or his OC or Goff's parents or Goff's parent's friends among the alumni. I don't blame the student section for not showing up this game. That was a brilliant one fingered salute to shameless posters on this forum, the coaching staff, and the administration for despising everyone else. For people who say they want to win, I think it's obvious that you want to win with your people, not win period. We are Egypt's democratic movement hijacked and going nowhere. I feel so helpless against this garbage. I'm not really upset about the season at all. I've seen bad seasons. But I am disgusted with the way the team is being handled. We're sunk with this captain and his supporters among the crew. They don't care if the program hits an iceberg as long as the captain's son gets his 50 hours of steering.


If you have good seats, can I have your season tickets for the next couple of years? I simply like to support whichever kids are wearing our school colors. They deserve that as part of their own Cal experience.
MrBerkeley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annarborbear;842213006 said:

If you have good seats, can I have your season tickets for the next couple of years? I simply like to support whichever kids are wearing our school colors. They deserve that as part of their own Cal experience.


Support ALL our kids wearing our school colors? Or selectively support SOME of our kids wearing our school colors? These are 2 different things.

Yeah I know the post is snarky. I feel bad about the harshness, but I am frustrated. I do want to be supportive of all the kids including Goff and Kline but when your leadership force feeds you a surrender season, its hard to swallow.

One of the greatest experiences of attending CAL is football and sports. Football isn't about just our players. Its about the student body. When they can't enjoy a season because we threw it away, I don't think the lets be supportive of our players argument applies. Yes, they are just kids. They deserve a CAL experience. So does the REST OF THE STUDENT BODY. Peace.
freshfunk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MrBerkeley, thank you. I think that's a pretty accurate assessment.

Like you, I have no allegiance to either. But a few games ago I felt that I had seen enough of Goff to give Kline a real chance. I didn't like being labeled a Kline fanboy because I wasn't rooting for Goff or Kline, but Cal.

From the little that Kline has shown, it seems like it would be worth giving him a chance. Alas, Sonny has chosen his path.

I really don't care too much for the debate anymore. Ultimately the fault lies in the decision maker (Sonny and coaches).

My only hope is that Rosen or Rubenzer are the second coming and win out next year (assuming Kline is gone and Goff had little/marginal improvement).
Cal89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MrBerkeley;842212998 said:

I thought the Kline crowd was bad, but as the season has progressed, I realize the Goff crowd is even worse. It's like watching a high school offensive coordinator parent selfishly supporting their QB child by calling only passing plays and refusing to sit them. Cal football this season has been hijacked by a handful of fakes who call themselves fans of the team. The rest of the team, the fans, the university are being held hostage by excuses.

This is going to come off snarky but this is what I’ve been thinking as the season has progressed to this point.

#1 Goff starts the season.
Goff Supporter (GF) argument: Well, coaches decided Goff> Kline in practice. (Pretend this is why you support Goff)
My thoughts: Sure, we'll give Goff a shot. Coaches probably know better. (I thought at this time only Kline supporters blindly backed their candidates and Goff supporters were reasonable).

#2 Goff fumbles the ball.
GS argument: "It's because he's a freshman and is adjusting."
My thoughts: Fumbling? Well nerves I guess. You might be right, but I doubt it. Still isn't an excuse, maybe a reason, but not an excuse. W/e. I guess we have no choice but to trust the coaches.

#3 Goff has a good game.
GS argument: “See! Goff is amazing.”
My thoughts: We are super lucky to have Goff. If he develops, we will have a great future. I hope Kline sticks around for the sake of the team and continues to develop. Good to have a solid backup QB.

#4 Goff repeatedly has bad games, fumbles, and keeps throwing Longshore interceptions.
GS argument: "It's everyone else's fault but that of Goff (aka your kid or your friend's kid). The running backs suck. The O-line sucks. The defense sucks."
My thoughts: Yeah, they kind of suck. So does Goff... he keeps fumbling and throwing bad interceptions. Stop trying to argue otherwise. You're basically calling me stupid to my face when you say Goff doesn't have issues. It might be other stuff INCLUDING Goff but Goff is clearly PART of the problem.

#5 Goff continues to fumble…
GS argument: (Don't want to admit that you specifically want Goff to be the answer and so you go into flounder mode trying to defend the ridiculous fumbles and interceptions because you're butt hurt Goff isn't panning out.)

-"We won't win a game anyway" (WTF kind of excuse is this? So we fold the season to prepare for Goff our savior, aka your kid?)
-“Defense sucks” (How much do you despise my football IQ to tell me the offense sucks because the defense sucks. Yeah we might still lose. But last time I checked the offense is separate from the defense. Field position might be the only thing that matters but considering we go 3 and out starting on our 20, it’s NOT the defense why our offense sucks.)
-"We need Goff to start for next year to make the system work or give Goff more (and more! )practice (and more!)" to develop. (and more!)" (cause we really want our kid Goff to do well).
-"Kline is not the answer!" (that was from your heart and not from your head. you have little evidence to make that kind of assessment with your head)
-"Coaches said so." (How freaking convenient. You don't support Goff because the coaches support Goff. Who the F can't see through this **** already).
-"Support the program." (I support smokers by supporting them as they try to quit. Not by supporting their smoking. We are going the wrong direction and I reject this argument. We need to quit going the wrong way).

My thoughts: Look. I am sorry about your kid Goff not doing well. I have no idea if Kline will do better. I don’t have anything personal against either. However, the familiar “Kline is not the answer” response gives me the impression of the “just because” kind of reason one gives when you don’t want/ don’t care to know about other options. You have become worse than the Kline fan, or rather, you were always worse. You just pretended otherwise because things panned out your way from the start.

I care less about what Goff/Kline needs to get in the NFL. I am not a parent of either. I care about the team and about Cal. They are here to play for this team FIRST. If they play well, they will go to the NFL and they deserve it and I support it. But Goff isn't good enough RIGHT AT THIS MOMENT to be the declared starter for the rest of the season (and the next). Dykes is full of bullshit for this reason. Let’s throw away this season and the next one too. In Goff’s final season he will have an amazing resume of 1 billion yards and a **** ton of TDs so he can go to the NFL. Mission accomplished. WTF. If there was any objectivity in this, we would have started Kline already and if he had sucked, then we could have gone back to Goff. If Dykes doesn't take us to the Rose Bowl in 2 seasons, fire Sandy and Dykes. If Goff doesn’t pan out, fire Sandy and Dykes. Dykes chained his fate to the success of Goff.

You want me to emotionally invest in this bullshit season? I will not invest in some personal project for Dykes or his OC or Goff’s parents or Goff’s parent’s friends among the alumni. I don’t blame the student section for not showing up this game. That was a brilliant one fingered salute to shameless posters on this forum, the coaching staff, and the administration for despising everyone else. For people who say they want to win, I think it’s obvious that you want to win with your people, not win period. We are Egypt’s democratic movement… hijacked and going nowhere. I feel so helpless against this garbage. I'm not really upset about the season at all. I've seen bad seasons. But I am disgusted with the way the team is being handled. We're sunk with this captain and his supporters among the crew. They don't care if the program hits an iceberg as long as the captain's son gets his 50 hours of steering.


You are not alone with such sentiment and frustration. I have echoed very much the same in various posts for some time now. Between fellow alums, old Cal roommates, others in my section, basically long-standing season ticket holders, and some very loyal ones at that, they've had it. And it ain't the losses... It's when this whole playing for the future thing was actually voiced; made official to some...

Everyone gets into a tizzy if the players are not giving it their all out there, maximum effort to get the W. The coaches are now being held by some, maybe more than some, to the same standard... It's making for empty seats in the same way if the players were going through the motions.

After week 2 and / or 3, I shared what I wanted to see improve for this team. It was a time of relative optimism. As bad as the season has gone, much of what I wanted to see, basically some modest improvement, is happening. The D over the past several games has picked things up. The running game is showing signs of progress, and even the OL has looked a bit better. No sacks today was certainly nice.

The improvement desired in the passing game did not materialize, and went south actually. It had picked-up a bit again, but not onto an improvement track. It was never about Goff as it was simply production from the position...

Different players getting into games, trying new positions, getting starts has been the MO for this staff. However, when it comes to QB, that has not been the case. Given the blah 60% pass completions, numerous TO's (picks, inexplicable fumbles, botched hand-offs) and a month or so of confidence issues (per SD), the position remains secure. Games with the majority of the drives being 3 and outs is losing football. Punting 9 times in a half (UW), really? The leader on the field is a big factor in effectiveness...

It would be asinine for or me anyone to say that Kline is the answer. Equally, the opposite, that he is not. I don't see anyone saying Kline is or will be better, just that he might be. There is some game time evidence that might be the case...

Like FF, when SD said what he said before the UW game, there is nothing to debate, as far as I'm concerned. He's the law, or possibly TF... I empathize with you MrBerkeley, thus my response...
MiltyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
freshfunk;842213021 said:

MrBerkeley, thank you. I think that's a pretty accurate assessment.

Like you, I have no allegiance to either. But a few games ago I felt that I had seen enough of Goff to give Kline a real chance. I didn't like being labeled a Kline fanboy because I wasn't rooting for Goff or Kline, but Cal.

From the little that Kline has shown, it seems like it would be worth giving him a chance. Alas, Sonny has chosen his path.

I really don't care too much for the debate anymore. Ultimately the fault lies in the decision maker (Sonny and coaches).

My only hope is that Rosen or Rubenzer are the second coming and win out next year (assuming Kline is gone and Goff had little/marginal improvement).


I quoted FF since his post was shortest, but I agree with MrBerkeley 100%

It really feels like our program has been hijacked by a couple of snake oil salesman more intent on showcasing their product which may or may not even be a good product, but sounds good on paper. Now everything looks ridiculously obvious that these coaches are here just for their personal gains, if they can produce passing records, create freshman QB legends, etc. It's like me playing NCAA football by EA passing a thousand times to have my QB throw for 5000 yards. These coaches don't care about Cal, don't care about the long term future for the program, and definitely doesn't care about whether Cal football even exists past the 3 years that they're here. As far as fixing the academics, all I see is lip service and forcing players out instead of working to help them graduate. It's a total nuking of the program as far as academics go, and Cal shouldn't be like this. This is not keeping up Cal's end of the bargain when these players signed up to play for Cal, with the expectation that they will be supported to graduate, since 90% of these players won't have any meaningful professional football career after Cal.

Sandy got sold, hard, and the program is diving off a cliff because of her hire.

I hate these coaches, more than I hated even Tom Holmoe after 3 years of him while I was in school. Holmoe was a bumbling fool out there, but he was our fool. I don't feel a shred of empathy or connection towards Dykes and TF. Heck I even appreciate Buh a little more now, at least I feel like he's actually trying to perform his job.
TheOther1BTF
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CalifoniaGoldenBearAid;842212603 said:

Goff has thrown yards yes, but can't win games. First game with a TD with first string Defense in who knows how long. But came with two picks and should have been several more. No leadership, makes more decisions. Idk guys. I'm over the season. We r stuck with sonnys decision unfortunately. I didn't see the game today (direct tv at work only). Someone with more insight, plz feel free


Goff is a true freshmen playing behind a bad O-Line with a weak running game to support him. He's playing pretty damn good under the circumstances. Kline would not fair any better.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What bothers me is that this year is a wasteland so both quarterbacks should have opportunities so the coaches will have a more full understanding of what their quarterbacks have to offer with the game on the line. Personally, I think so far Goff plays his worst with the game on the line. That has been when the really bad interceptions have come. Maybe that will change, I don't know. I also don't know how Kline will perform with the game on the line and neither do the coaches. The coaches are wasting an opportunity to find out in a season that is futile.

In my gut I have a feeling the southern coaches don't like the cocky California kid who wears a U.S. flag bandana. I hope that isn't the case.

As a long suffering Cal fan there are some things I have come to expect. What I currently expect is for Kline to transfer and to play great for some other team.
tenplay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
theother1btf;842213213 said:

goff is a true freshmen playing behind a bad o-line with a weak running game to support him. He's playing pretty damn good under the circumstances. Kline would not fair any better.


+100
TheSouseFamily
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheOther1BTF;842213213 said:

Goff is a true freshmen playing behind a bad O-Line with a weak running game to support him. He's playing pretty damn good under the circumstances. Kline would not fair any better.


I assume you didn't watch the game yesterday. Goff throws a very wobbly ball, is an extremely limited as a runner and makes bad reads (like the last interception where he throws into triple coverage with a man wide open). After the first game, I was impressed with Goff but that first game appears to be an aberration. Dykes has shaken up every other position to see what he's got roster-wise except for QB and his stubborn loyalty to Goff is becoming increasingly bizarre, frankly.

If nothing else, even if he is THE guy, wouldn't Goff benefit for a series or two on the sidelines just to see the game from a different perspective and view how opponents are scheming us? I don't understand the "Kline wouldn't do any better" argument. He hasn't had all the reps and game experience that Goff has ha and yet he still looks better. The whole situation just seems strange.

And lastly, let's give the "the coaches know better" argument a rest too. Generally, I'd agree with that but we know that Dykes and TFS whiffed on their last two QB decisions at Arizona and LaTech.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Goff is a very young QB making many mistakes. He certainly made some poor choices yesterday and will learn from them. He will be an outstanding player sooner rather than later.
MiltyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't think Goff is that bad and probably better than a senior Maynard but why can't we just take a look at Kline in this lost season?
Ace4eVer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MiltyBear;842213171 said:

I quoted FF since his post was shortest, but I agree with MrBerkeley 100%

It really feels like our program has been hijacked by a couple of snake oil salesman more intent on showcasing their product which may or may not even be a good product, but sounds good on paper. Now everything looks ridiculously obvious that these coaches are here just for their personal gains, if they can produce passing records, create freshman QB legends, etc. It's like me playing NCAA football by EA passing a thousand times to have my QB throw for 5000 yards. These coaches don't care about Cal, don't care about the long term future for the program, and definitely doesn't care about whether Cal football even exists past the 3 years that they're here. As far as fixing the academics, all I see is lip service and forcing players out instead of working to help them graduate. It's a total nuking of the program as far as academics go, and Cal shouldn't be like this. This is not keeping up Cal's end of the bargain when these players signed up to play for Cal, with the expectation that they will be supported to graduate, since 90% of these players won't have any meaningful professional football career after Cal.

Sandy got sold, hard, and the program is diving off a cliff because of her hire.

I hate these coaches, more than I hated even Tom Holmoe after 3 years of him while I was in school. Holmoe was a bumbling fool out there, but he was our fool. I don't feel a shred of empathy or connection towards Dykes and TF. Heck I even appreciate Buh a little more now, at least I feel like he's actually trying to perform his job.


I'm also worried that their interest is in setting records with the system and making sure the world knows about it. Dykes has coach speak down to a science and has had it since he was hired. I just can't get over the idea that we're barrelling to a 1-11 record, but we won't even give the other QB a look.

None of us know if Kline will be better or worse. We do know that sometimes guys play better in games than in practice. We do know that Goff has a turnover problem. I don't see what there is to lose by letting Kline play from a clean slate, aside from the statistics in a game. That is the pessimist in me and maybe that one extra game from Goff instead of Kline translates to another win next year. I doubt it, but thats how the coaches are treating it. I guess the other half of that is they're worried about a QB controversey. I think its ridiculous because on a 1-11 team, there should be an every position controversey.
Cal89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheSouseFamily;842213259 said:

I assume you didn't watch the game yesterday. Goff throws a very wobbly ball, is an extremely limited as a runner and makes bad reads (like the last interception where he throws into triple coverage with a man wide open). After the first game, I was impressed with Goff but that first game appears to be an aberration. Dykes has shaken up every other position to see what he's got roster-wise except for QB and his stubborn loyalty to Goff is becoming increasingly bizarre, frankly.

If nothing else, even if he is THE guy, wouldn't Goff benefit for a series or two on the sidelines just to see the game from a different perspective and view how opponents are scheming us? And lastly, I don't understand the "Kline wouldn't do any better" argument. He hasn't had all the reps and game experience that Goff has ha and yet he still looks better. The whole situation just seems strange.


You conclude each paragraph with sentiment such as "bizarre" and "strange". Indeed. I'll add disappointing and disillusioning too...

I don't see the NU game as an aberration though as that would somehow indicate the our QB play was better. It really was not:

- 60% passes completed (where he's gravitated all season, his average)
- 121 QBR (a bit worse than his season average)
- 3 picks (2 not seemingly his fault, so let's say 1, which is his average)

I think some might have memories of a good performance as it was in the opener, our brand new offense, led by a brand new freshman QB, against supposedly a very solid, ranked opponent. And the biggie, he threw for 445 yards! Oh, the threads here went on for a few weeks... Uuh, he threw the dang ball 63 times. Throw it half that much like most QB'a, and it's a pedestrian 200+ yard performance.

As far as Goff taking the seat for a series or two, for the reasons you explained, it ain't gonna happen. A back-up will only come-in if / when there is an implosion, rescue mode as I call it. And in such instances, it's not about let's give the back-up QB some minutes, as it's about let's save our starter from himself (psyche protection). Kline otherwise got some meaningless minutes at the very end of the Wazzu game. Hinder likewise, at the end of UW. Two times this season the back-up QB's get garbage time. That's it. So long as there are no inexplicable QB TO's, the starter stays in to get as much experience as possible...

Also, we all know TF wants that freshman passing yards record so he can add another testimonial-like blurb to the TFS website. I'm sure he sold Cal on this too, how such a record can be used to springboard into next season. How it can be part of the 2014 ad campaign to stir-up interest in Cal football. Whatever... Goff needs about 300 yds a game, and that's what he's been doing, and got yesterday. Giving another QB a series or two, a start especially, is not contributory to this end.

While this team has shown signs of improving in several areas, we have not in the passing game, and have taken steps backward, the offense in general. More than half our drives do not get a single first down (3 and outs). We have a huge number of punts, like 9 in the first half against UW. TO's galore. I think with the exception of one game, we did not lose this "battle". This is on the offense. Given that the QB has been directly responsible for many of these TO's, and leads the offense on the field, he is very much accountable for the inept drives. Common sense would seemingly dictate that he either he needs to improve, or the leaders off the field need to seek other options for improvement. The fact that this has not happened, and seemingly will not, to be polite - is strange and bizarre, or disappointing and disillusioning.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYCGOBEARS;842213265 said:

Goff is a very young QB making many mistakes. He certainly made some poor choices yesterday and will learn from them. He will be an outstanding player sooner rather than later.


"Goff, with 289 passing yards, jumped over six players on Cal's single season top-10 passing list into the No. 5 spot at 2,881.
He needs to average 206.3 yards the rest of the season to break Pat Barns' 1996 school record of 3,499."

-Contra Costa Times 11/03/13
Looperbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister;842213321 said:

"Goff, with 289 passing yards, jumped over six players on Cal's single season top-10 passing list into the No. 5 spot at 2,881.
He needs to average 206.3 yards the rest of the season to break Pat Barns' 1996 school record of 3,499."

-Contra Costa Times 11/03/13


This, the passing records, appears to be what the coaching staff cares about.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looperbear;842213354 said:

This, the passing records, appears to be what the coaching staff cares about.

You are all delusional that believe this. Sure, Sonny and Tony would rather have a passing record and lose games and endanger their careers rather than have a winning team.
Cal89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looperbear;842213354 said:

This, the passing records, appears to be what the coaching staff cares about.


And if that truly is indeed the case, or even a factor, I find it very bothersome. I had shared a few weeks back that this was seemingly the case. The thought of personnel decisions being made, influenced by records, or what will help elevate the System, is unsettling...

While we all felt that we knew what we were getting into with TF and the TFS, if it is to this extreme, dare I say in the conflict of interest realm, we have a serious problem here.

Gosh, even if the record were something meaningful like wins by a freshman QB, or statistically relevant toward such (winning games) like completion percentage or QBR, it would still raise an eyebrow. The easiest way to get more passing yards is to throw more often. BFD. If the rest of QB's in college football threw as much, his total yards would be like the rest of his stats - less than average to poor...
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheSouseFamily;842213259 said:

Dykes has shaken up every other position to see what he's got roster-wise except for QB and his stubborn loyalty to Goff is becoming increasingly bizarre, frankly.


Well, I can see a reason for it. And before I start, let me just say that I would also like to see Kline get some kind of extended audition in a live game . . . but I can see why the QB position has not been "shaken up" as others have been.

None of the other positions carries the responsibility the QB position does. The other positions do not have to call plays in the huddle, check the defense at the line of scrimmage, and handle the ball on nearly EVERY play (okay, the Center handles the ball on every play too, but I think we all know why that's different). Given this, I can see why coaches are more loath to make a change at QB, though they shuttle players in and out all the time at other positions. You put a new guy in there and you are dealing with training a whole new field general. And yes, I know that to some extent all of the QBs "should" be trained and ready to step in, but let's be realistic -- practice time is limited and the first string gets the most attention. That's just how it is.

Likening a QB change to changes at other positions is not acknowledging the larger reality of how football works. Again, I'm not against giving Kline a start or extended duty in a live game (because at this point this season is basically a training ground for next season anyway), but I also know from watching a lot of football that (1) the backup QB is typically the most popular player on a losing team and (2) when the backup gets in there most of the time he is not better than the starter. Fans like to think that the "next guy" could do better (since it gives them hope that a hard season could be made better), but the hard reality is that usually the best guy was already playing.
Cal89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey, I see your take and agree to an extent as that view can be used to explain why we see what see - no exploration at the QB spot. I've had a couple posts where I say that at QB, it's typically considered prudent to not be so cavalier with change. Makes sense. I believe such a stance to be somewhat universal in acceptance...

It's that this staff is most creative with change everywhere but QB, and play at the position has languished. It would not have been unreasonable to get a bit more creative at QB, while still be respectful of the unique position. Being that you'd want to see the #2 get a shot indicates the same of course...

To put things into perspective if the 2013 season was over now, Goff would have had the 4th most passing attempts as based upon 2012 conference figures. He's already thrown the ball more times that most QB's will this season. With no chance for a bowl, winning season, break even conference record, there is not much more result-wise to achieve - but to win a game. An FBS one. As just explained, Goff has already had a season of experience passing...

There's more at play here.
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Davidson;842212616 said:

Goff isnt the problem and Kline isnt the solution,
Just FYI


Agree and would add that Goff isn't the long term solution either unless he remakes his body to either have the speed or strength to avoid sacks. No sacks today but he also was tentative in the pocket because, IMO, he feels too vulnerable.

Pushing my chips in for Rubenzer in 2014 and beyond.
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey;842212730 said:

Very true. The silver lining is that Goff is a freshman, while Maynard was a senior.


Regardless of Goff, the silver lining is that Maynard is gone.
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Irishbear;842212740 said:

Hide your dogs.


He's over that. He's now abusing Eagles.
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The problem with Goff is that he plays just well enough to start given that his supposed replacement, Kline, practices just poor enough for Goff to start.

Great WRs notwithstanding, Goff is a very good passer. But there is a difference between a passer and a QB, especially these days. Pure passers like Fouts and Marino would never even make it in college these days. Neither will Goff if he doesn't become a QB as it is defined today.

A quality QB needs to...
[LIST=1]
  • Lead by example, taking advantage of opportunities during the game to give the team chance to win.
  • Lead in the locker room by being outgoing and developing relationships with the other players so that confidence and motivation is elevated
  • Move in the pocket and buy time to extend plays
  • Be strong and/or quick enough to fight off sacks
  • Be effecient: Throw the ball away instead of throw an INT or take a loss
  • Throw every kind of pass
  • Elevate play at critical times
  • Play better in games than in practice


    I have a feeling that Kline is better than Goff in these ways, except the aspects that involve pure passing.

    While I am also concerned that TF may be a bit of a salesman, I also question the logic of those that think he cares more about stats than wins.

    Part of his spiel is that the only stat that matters is wins. So why would this season help him sell anything? I would think potential buyers would throw our W/L record in his face.
  • 79 Bear
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    heartofthebear;842213414 said:

    Agree and would add that Goff isn't the long term solution either unless he remakes his body to either have the speed or strength to avoid sacks. No sacks today but he also was tentative in the pocket because, IMO, he feels too vulnerable.

    Pushing my chips in for Rubenzer in 2014 and beyond.


    He got sacked once.

    This was not Goff's best game, but also not his worst. He did some very good things as did his receivers. For one thing, he had the presence of mind to avoid an AZ touchdown or safety by fielding a very low snap in the back of the end zone and tossing the ball near an eligible receiver with 2 or 3 Wildcats bearing down on him. He then argued with the ref, who reversed the call of intentional grounding. To those who say the kid has no moxie: Give me a break. His last TD pass was also a thing of beauty. He is very talented, mature, competitive and calm. He will only get better. He did seem to have a tendency this game to lock on a receiver but this is the first time I've seen that. One of his INTs was perhaps a miscommunication between him and Harper. The other goes on Goff. By the way, for the guy who wants to compare Goff to Jameis Winston, Winston had 1 TD and 2 INTs; Goff had 4 TDs and 2 INTs.

    As for those who keep insisting Kline play, how many of you have been at practice and able to compare the two? I went to one Spring practice and came away thinking that the QB competition was tight but that Goff looked the best.

    Finally, "Muncie" wants to challenge the football knowledge credentials of everyone who thinks Goff is a good QB. I'd like to know Muncie's credentials. Current or former coach, player, armchair QB?
    RealDrew2
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Stats in football are not particularly meaningful. I still remember all those qbs from Houston who were awful once they got to NFL. The fact you are touting his passing records is just silly. I feel like dykes and his apologist are just telling us to ignore our eyes.
    Cal89
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    heartofthebear;842213454 said:

    The problem with Goff is that he plays just well enough to start given that his supposed replacement, Kline, practices just poor enough for Goff to start.

    Great WRs notwithstanding, Goff is a very good passer. But there is a difference between a passer and a QB, especially these days. Pure passers like Fouts and Marino would never even make it in college these days. Neither will Goff if he doesn't become a QB as it is defined today.

    A quality QB needs to...
    [LIST=1]
  • Lead by example, taking advantage of opportunities during the game to give the team chance to win.
  • Lead in the locker room by being outgoing and developing relationships with the other players so that confidence and motivation is elevated
  • Move in the pocket and buy time to extend plays
  • Be strong and/or quick enough to fight off sacks
  • Be effecient: Throw the ball away instead of throw an INT or take a loss
  • Throw every kind of pass
  • Elevate play at critical times
  • Play better in games than in practice


    I have a feeling that Kline is better than Goff in these ways, except the aspects that involve pure passing.

    While I am also concerned that TF may be a bit of a salesman, I also question the logic of those that think he cares more about stats than wins.

    Part of his spiel is that the only stat that matters is wins. So why would this season help him sell anything? I would think potential buyers would throw our W/L record in his face.


  • Heart, good stuff as usual...

    You are right that TF expounds the objective - to win football games. He finally has another chance to prove that the TFS can thrive in a major D1 conference, so this is a big deal to him. Understandably so. I still have hope for the system here. We were told early-on that there are likely to be serious growing pains and that the challenge will be to remain true to the system, what has been taught, and to both not give-up or possibly worse, revert back to what one knows or has worked in the past. I remain on board but do have my concerns, I guess like many...

    There will likely be spin. 'The worst D in college football (at least it was last week) was simply too much of an detriment for this true freshman QB to overcome on the maiden voyage of this prolific offensive system. Not only does Mr. Goff break the freshman record for passing yards, he breaks the university's passing yard record too. That is the promise of the TFS...'

    And if Cal's performance is still thrown back in his face, as it should, the youth of the team and the monumental injuries can certainly be brought-up in defense.
    cal98
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    heartofthebear;842213420 said:

    Regardless of Goff, the silver lining is that Maynard is gone.


    When ZM was done last year, I thought that would be low point of our program, boy was I off.

    Tedford + Maynard >>> Dykes + Franklin + Buh
    MiltyBear
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    sycasey;842213395 said:

    Well, I can see a reason for it. And before I start, let me just say that I would also like to see Kline get some kind of extended audition in a live game . . . but I can see why the QB position has not been "shaken up" as others have been.

    None of the other positions carries the responsibility the QB position does. The other positions do not have to call plays in the huddle, check the defense at the line of scrimmage, and handle the ball on nearly EVERY play (okay, the Center handles the ball on every play too, but I think we all know why that's different). Given this, I can see why coaches are more loath to make a change at QB, though they shuttle players in and out all the time at other positions. You put a new guy in there and you are dealing with training a whole new field general. And yes, I know that to some extent all of the QBs "should" be trained and ready to step in, but let's be realistic -- practice time is limited and the first string gets the most attention. That's just how it is.

    Likening a QB change to changes at other positions is not acknowledging the larger reality of how football works. Again, I'm not against giving Kline a start or extended duty in a live game (because at this point this season is basically a training ground for next season anyway), but I also know from watching a lot of football that (1) the backup QB is typically the most popular player on a losing team and (2) when the backup gets in there most of the time he is not better than the starter. Fans like to think that the "next guy" could do better (since it gives them hope that a hard season could be made better), but the hard reality is that usually the best guy was already playing.


    I thought the Center handles the play calls in this offense? I thought this offense was so easy that any QB can come in and run it?

    You need to stop reaching to make excuses for Dykes and TFS because it's obvious what they're trying to do here. Winning a game in 2013 or even 2014 is #98 and 99 down their totem pole of goals.
    MiltyBear
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Cal89;842213372 said:

    And if that truly is indeed the case, or even a factor, I find it very bothersome. I had shared a few weeks back that this was seemingly the case. The thought of personnel decisions being made, influenced by records, or what will help elevate the System, is unsettling...

    While we all felt that we knew what we were getting into with TF and the TFS, if it is to this extreme, dare I say in the conflict of interest realm, we have a serious problem here.

    Gosh, even if the record were something meaningful like wins by a freshman QB, or statistically relevant toward such (winning games) like completion percentage or QBR, it would still raise an eyebrow. The easiest way to get more passing yards is to throw more often. BFD. If the rest of QB's in college football threw as much, his total yards would be like the rest of his stats - less than average to poor...


    This is also very likely why they decided to hired Buh. They've never had much connection with Buh, but hired him anyway and said he was good enough for the job. Turns out, they probably just want a scapegoat to explain why there are so many losses, and point to the D.

    Any D coordinator coming in here has to know that this is a sh*tshow job, even if TFS is working well. The D is designed to suck, or at least face immense pressure with such a long game so designed by the offense. The D is on the field defending likely double the plays they would have if they had played on a conventional team.

    That's why I think we're seeing some improvements with the D lately, because Buh is still trying to do his job, maybe in vain. Like I mentioned, I have much more faith and empathy for Buh than Dykes/TFS right now.
    dimitrig
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Go!Bears;842212732 said:

    Is a Freshman. I'd love to see Kline, but what do you expect from a Frosh? BTW, Kline is also Freshman. I suspect he might not yet be all-American caliber, either.



    That kid at Florida State makes Goff look like Levy. Amazing!
    JSML
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    The problem is not that Goff is young, it's that the whole offense is young and inexperienced, and learning a new system. It's like trotting out the freshman - sophomore team every week against someone's varsity team.

    Goff is the better QB with the higher upside. Sonny is willing to stake his job on it and that speaks loudly. Let Sonny make the decisions and be accountable for what he does.

    No matter what anyone says, I believe Sonny and Tony Franklin are very motivated to do well at Cal and to keep their jobs and they will act accordingly.

    Here on BI, we don't have our jobs or reputations at stake. Sure it's frustrating and fans gripe when things are not going well. I just don't like seeing how Sonny is "idiotic" or "strange" for not putting Kline in. Fans often have the thinnest of facts and knowledge.

    My personal belief: Goff is talented. He will be the first Cal QB since AR to be on an NFL roster. Not at all concerned about his passing turnovers or his fourth down turnovers. Every QB throws turnovers, even Super Bowl QBs can throw 2,3 or 4 a game. It will improve as everyone on the team learns the system better. WRs too. He needs to clean up his fumbles after being hit or not hit. He needs to take more sacks instead of trying to make a play. He will be more than just fine next year, not solely because of his improvement but more so the whole team's improvement under this system.
    MiltyBear
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    JSML;842213886 said:

    The problem is not that Goff is young, it's that the whole offense is young and inexperienced, and learning a new system. It's like trotting out the freshman - sophomore team every week against someone's varsity team.

    Goff is the better QB with the higher upside. Sonny is willing to stake his job on it and that speaks loudly. Let Sonny make the decisions and be accountable for what he does.

    No matter what anyone says, I believe Sonny and Tony Franklin are very motivated to do well at Cal and to keep their jobs and they will act accordingly.

    Here on BI, we don't have our jobs or reputations at stake. Sure it's frustrating and fans gripe when things are not going well. I just don't like seeing how Sonny is "idiotic" or "strange" for not putting Kline in. Fans often have the thinnest of facts and knowledge.

    My personal belief: Goff is talented. He will be the first Cal QB since AR to be on an NFL roster. Not at all concerned about his passing turnovers or his fourth down turnovers. Every QB throws turnovers, even Super Bowl QBs can throw 2,3 or 4 a game. It will improve as everyone on the team learns the system better. WRs too. He needs to clean up his fumbles after being hit or not hit. He needs to take more sacks instead of trying to make a play. He will be more than just fine next year, not solely because of his improvement but more so the whole team's improvement under this system.


    This is a fair opinion even if it doesn't match with what we've seen on the field so far. Either way, fans will suffer with the product on the field until Dykes proves otherwise. It's hard to see the light because I've seen no improvement with the offense, only regression.

    Even the better OL play on pass protection is probably attributed to the base defense of Arizona than anything the 2 point stance could do. There is still no push on running plays so the runs are either negative, 0, or 8+ yards if the RBs can squeeze through a hole somewhere or create one themselves. There is no consistent running game at all.
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.