Adam Schefter reporting that DJax to sign multi-year agreement with Washington

4,155 Views | 33 Replies | Last: 12 yr ago by okaydo
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This was just posted to SportsCenter's FB page. No link yet to a corresponding story on ESPN.

E.T.A. I think BI policy doesn't allow me to post a link to ESPN. ESPN has updated an earlier story to inclde that a)Jackson spent Tuesday night in Wshington, b)that his agent is talking numbers with the club, and c) that sources have indicated to Schefter that a deal is expected to get done.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This should be fun.
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How so?
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
guess his thought " im going F them up 2 twice a season" ..
healthy RGIII and DJax and can we say field stretch
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everything in Washington is predicated on RGIII being healthy -- otherwise nothing will help them. I think they like the idea of a player who knows Philly's playbook, and who can alsoreplace Santana Moss, who has clearly lost a step.
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SoFlaBear;842299864 said:

How so?


Plays the Eagles 2x a year for starters. Those meetings will be super-hyped.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hanky1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Schefter is reporting it then it's a done deal. He's never wrong.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ESPN just reported that DJax's publicist tweeted it's done.
Davidson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How much
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Davidson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh damn the niners were in it? Bummers
philbert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo;842299880 said:




More lies from the Cal haters! :p
Willgonnabaight
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The eagles got nothing in return, and now get to face DeSean twice a year for the next 3 years.

Should have traded him out of the division for a late rounder.
SoCalBear323
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Willgonnabaight;842299915 said:

The eagles got nothing in return, and now get to face DeSean twice a year for the next 3 years.

Should have traded him out of the division for a late rounder.


GM should be 💩 canned.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Richard Sherman writes:'

http://mmqb.si.com/2014/04/02/richard-sherman-desean-jackson/

Quote:

I grew up in Watts, and I played baseball with DeSean in elementary school on a team coached by his father near Inglewood. His father, Bill, picked me up from elementary school 30 minutes away from his home for practice and games because my parents both worked and didn't finish until later, and I wanted to play baseball with some childhood friends. Bill was a great coach, and a great man. He died of pancreatic cancer in 2009, the summer after his son's rookie season. DeSean and I didn't hang out then like we did as kids.
goingfortheroses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What I saw was 3 year deal for $24 million, $16 million guaranteed.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Take off that red shirt!

Davidson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
30m in the last 2 years, not bad for 170lbs dripping wet
tim94501
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good for him. Hope he torches the Eagles.
socaliganbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is he going yo have a qb with two legs?
Vandalus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaliganbear;842299994 said:

Is he going yo have a qb with two legs?


Yes. Reports are that he's expected to be fully healed, unlike last year.
Willgonnabaight
How long do you want to ignore this user?
the way that he holds the pen is a gang sign
ColoradoBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
goingfortheroses;842299959 said:

What I saw was 3 year deal for $24 million, $16 million guaranteed.


Including the dead money Philly has already paid him, it seems that he will basically make the same over the next 3 years as he would have made with the eagles. Washington saves a few bucks because the Eagles ate $6 million of the signing bonus. (If another team had traded for him, I believe his cap hit would have been $10 million instead of $8 million over three years, so the eagles burned $6 million in a cap hit by not trading him for ANY pick... and they take the hit all at once).
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tim94501;842299993 said:

Good for him. Hope he torches the Eagles.


+1

:gobears:
YuSeeBerkeley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ColoradoBear1;842300022 said:

Including the dead money Philly has already paid him, it seems that he will basically make the same over the next 3 years as he would have made with the eagles. Washington saves a few bucks because the Eagles ate $6 million of the signing bonus. (If another team had traded for him, I believe his cap hit would have been $10 million instead of $8 million over three years, so the eagles burned $6 million in a cap hit by not trading him for ANY pick... and they take the hit all at once).


When I first saw the terms, I noticed it was a lower average than what he had with the Eagles. I didn't consider the dead money, though. Good for him, in that case. I think he is going into a better situation. Garcon is a better complement than Maclin. They have a better TE in Jordan Reed. They have a reliable RB in Alfred Morris. Obviously, he's not as good as LeSean McCoy, but that's not necessarily a bad thing as it makes it less likely for the Redskins to be a run focused offense. Most importantly, they have a better QB, when healthy, in RGIII. Nick Foles was great last year, but let's see how he does with a full offseason of teams preparing with game tape on him.
Davidson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The big difference is the guaranteed money. His contract with the eagles had something like $15m guaranteed. He only saw $18m from them total.

Now he gets another $16m guaranteed. That is huge.

The only thing that really matters is the guaranteed money, you most likely see very little of the rest that inflate the contract #s.

This is like saying 2 years ago, he had a $30m guaranteed money for the next 5 years. Who gets that kind of contract? no one but star QBs.

dude played it right, balling out of control, just look at that sly smile
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Under the circumstances, it's a very good deal for DeSean. Especially since there's a good chance that, instead of multiple other suitors willing to pay big money ("mystery" or otherwise), Jackson in actuality had a crazy handful of nothin'.


http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/04/02/the-full-desean-jackson-contract-details/
CalBearRJ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Davidson;842300057 said:

The big difference is the guaranteed money. His contract with the eagles had something like $15m guaranteed. He only saw $18m from them total.

Now he gets another $16m guaranteed. That is huge.

The only thing that really matters is the guaranteed money, you most likely see very little of the rest that inflate the contract #s.

This is like saying 2 years ago, he had a $30m guaranteed money for the next 5 years. Who gets that kind of contract? no one but star QBs.

dude played it right, balling out of control, just look at that sly smile


This is mostly true. He did "only" earn $18 million from his last deal, but he did it over two years, which is a pretty good annual salary for a WR. When they say you're not likely to get the non-guaranteed money in an NFL contract, it's often because of this exact situation: you get cut before your contract is up. Had he continued to make the Eagle's roster, he likely would have realized the majority of the ~47 million promised to him at roughly the same $9 million/year rate.

Interestingly, his new deal is the one that guarantees him less. He can be on the roster but miss out on as much as $3.75 million in years two and three by failing to play in games, since he has a per game bonus. Technically, he could be on the roster all three years, and only make $16.5 million of the $24 million contract. That's not very likely, but it's possible.

The way this is structured, though, does make it very unlikely that he'll be cut before the end of the deal. In year two, his cap hit would be less than the dead money owed, and in year three, his cap his is only ~$3 million more than the dead money owed. His production would have to fall off a cliff for him to be worth cutting either of those years.

This looks like a pretty good deal for our guy, and for the redskins. I'm pretty happy he landed in a place that will capitalize on his talents. Should be fun to watch.
CalBearRJ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo;842300091 said:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/04/02/the-full-desean-jackson-contract-details/


Florio must have accidentally linked to the wrong Youtube video. It should have been this one.
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Willgonnabaight;842300003 said:

the way that he holds the pen is a gang sign


Really and truly, I find interesting that the Eagles -- a team that signed a convicted felon who tortured and killed dogs as part of a dog-fighting and gambling operation -- are concerned with DeSean Jackson's possible gang connection.
CalBearRJ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SoFlaBear;842300140 said:

Really and truly, I find interesting that the Eagles -- a team that signed a convicted felon who tortured and killed dogs as part of a dog-fighting and gambling operation -- are concerned with DeSean Jackson's possible gang connection.


My wild speculation is that the Eagles leaked that bogus story to give themselves some cover for cutting Desean. They did it for money reasons, and because Chip thinks his offense doesn't need premier WRs. Arguably, it's a good business decision (though it's not what I would have done) but it's certainly going to look bad. So...you create a story about Desean being a gangster, and cut ties under false pretenses.
beelzebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All I can say is Philly and Washbag are two of the weirdest and dumbest franchises.

Philly gets nothing and now sees him twice a year but hey the Chipster IS IN CHARGE! Considering how cheap they are, totaly bone head move.

Washbag, did you see this about Snyder: Daniel Snyder starting Washington Redskins Original Americans Foundation For pete sake, what would Snyder think if someone started a similar or for "Really Persecuted Jews".

That said, should be entertaining to see then play.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This has Randy Moss Redux written all over it .
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister;842300337 said:

This has Randy Moss Redux written all over it .


Pats or raiders?
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.