BGolden;842324513 said:
Don't know why, but I've always rooted for the Dutch.....
Everyone loves the Dutch. Just ask my wife.
Signed,
2nd Generation Dutch American
BGolden;842324513 said:
Don't know why, but I've always rooted for the Dutch.....
BGGB2;842324630 said:
Everyone loves the Dutch. Just ask my wife.
Signed,
2nd Generation Dutch American
TheBearsHaveWon;842324595 said:
Colorado
I agree with your analysis of the laws in your first paragraph. I do not comment on anything beyond that.
KAM asked what the Law was for this play and I was answering that.
I cannot comment beyond providing clarification and explanation of the LotG. I hold a position with USSF where I must adhere to a code of ethics, a code I take seriously. This code restricts me from commenting directly on the performance of a referee nor to question or comment on their calls.
Not directed at anyone in particular:
Just to pick a nit, in soccer the word is singular: Offside.
This comes from the British term for team (a "side"). When a player was out of position, he was "off his side". Hence, offside.
Sorry. The term offsides when used in terms of soccer is as grating as fingernails on a chalkboard for me. Yes, pedantic.
Phantomfan;842324505 said:
Man, thats where they put their good crew. That game was pretty well called... let those guys play mostly, and it was insane.
Edit: Nope. Garbage
sycasey;842324646 said:
I'm not going to blame the ref too much for this call. At full speed it did look like his leg got clipped, and they did not have the benefit of this replay (maybe they should).
Though on this angle it seems obvious that he deliberately stepped on the Dutch defender's foot. Kind of like when a basketball player pump-fakes and then throws himself into a leaping defender to draw a foul.
KoreAmBear;842324636 said:
Actually my mistake. The PBP guys were the ones that said Dos Santos was offside off the Cameroon touch from the El Tri corner. It was Taylor Twellman and Ruud Van Nistelrooy during the halftime show who were emphatic that El Tri were robbed. Bob Ley was trying to get them to explain it, but they just were busy being so indignant that all they provided was a conclusion rather than analysis. Funny how guys that have international caps got this completely wrong -- but Taylor especially sounded like he knew what he was talking about. Oh well.
BGGB2;842324630 said:
Everyone loves the Dutch. Just ask my wife.
Signed,
2nd Generation Dutch American
sycasey;842324646 said:
I'm not going to blame the ref too much for this call. At full speed it did look like his leg got clipped, and they did not have the benefit of this replay (maybe they should).
Though on this angle it seems obvious that he deliberately stepped on the Dutch defender's foot. Kind of like when a basketball player pump-fakes and then throws himself into a leaping defender to draw a foul.
NYCGOBEARS;842324673 said:
They are most agreeable and congenial. Just never do business with them. That's when you realize why they were amongst the most brutal of colonialists.
Signed,
Married to a 2nd Generation Dutch American.
tabear82;842324740 said:
I could use some help...I'm in Germany for a while, and have no TV in my apartment. Anyone know how I can view the games online from here? ESPN3 and Xfinity don't seem to work outside the states.
Phantomfan;842324737 said:
http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20140613/news/140619875
Guide to the world cup for college football fans
sycasey;842324424 said:
We should also forward this to the Pac-12 officiating office.
BGolden;842324746 said:
Woohoo, Ticas.
My best friend from Costa Rica is who got me interested in the World Cup. She be very happy right about now.
SoCalBear323;842324753 said:
Post a pic
BGolden;842324746 said:
Woohoo, Ticas.
My best friend from Costa Rica is who got me interested in the World Cup. She be very happy right about now.
Phantomfan;842324768 said:
Watching this WC in day three shows how terrible that Japanese ref is
sycasey;842324785 said:
A very England kind of loss. Give the early appearance that they might be able to take down one of the power teams, then fall apart down the stretch.
That Tuscaloosa News article was dead-on -- they are Notre Dame.
93gobears;842324787 said:
But they invented the game!
Phantomfan;842324618 said:
In this case, most easly asserted because a defender is at the post. Literally as far towards the back line as possible.
Additionally there can be no offside on a direct corner. If there was no contact, the first player to touch it would be legal for those two reasons.
Finally, a player can not be offside on a ball deliberately played by a defender. Ie the header (if it touched the yellow player) is a deliberate play, not a save, and so not offside if a green player then plays it. (Maybe control is more of a factor than I understood)
I posted a gif replay. There is a claim a defender touched the ball first...even then it was a tight call. Everyone was basically in line, with the yellow player sprinting for to clear the ball. You don't stick yourself in the game on that kind of play. No one can tell anything on the replays...but the ref seems to have seen something to disallow a goal in the World Cup for the third time in two matches.
I am interested to know why you would say an offside call on that play (a corner played by the first person to clearly touch it) would be called
tabear82;842324743 said:
Thanks! I tried that, but I get a message that "Univision Deportes is not available in your region".
TheBearsHaveWon;842324792 said:
Hi Phantom:
Thanks for the response.
I think I may not have been clear in my question, however. I was not so much interested in the assessment of this particular play.
Rather, I was wondering why you had originally posted that the call was terrible because offside had been called during a corner kick play. The inference was that offside should never be called during CK plays.
I was particularly interested in discussing this aspect because this is one of what we call the "Myths of the Game"
For some reason many folks believe that offside should never be called after a corner kick (and again, I really am not trying to single you out - I have argued with many who believe this position religiously). I was just wondering if this was something that was considered "common knowledge" among those in your circle.
My own theory is that this myth comes from an incomplete understanding of Laws 15, 16 and 17. All of these restarts exempt the teammate, who receives the ball DIRECTLY on the restart, from being sanctioned for being a PIOP who subsequently is involved in active play.
However, as already explained, offside can and should be called if the subsequent play warrants.
-TBHW
Aside - there are many other "common knowledge" Myths of the Game e.g.:
-Every time the ball touches a hand, a hand ball should be called.
Um. No.
- It can't be a foul 'cause I got the ball first.
Just because you touched the ball doesn't mean you cannot commit a foul.
- I don't have to back up - they need to ask for ten
No they don't, and you better start backing up right now.....
- That was a high kick! Why doesn't he call the high kick???
There is no such foul as a "high kick"
etc...