USA v. Germany
15,198 Views |
93 Replies |
Last: 11 yr ago by BearlyClad
Damnit, why is this game on at 9 am?
(I'll be watching anyway, but it's harder to watch at 9 am than at 3 pm).
(I'll be watching anyway, but it's harder to watch at 9 am than at 3 pm).
#IBelieveThatWeWillWin :patriot
Is Klinnsman technically a Bearant?
okaydo;842328089 said:
Is Klinnsman technically a Bearant?
Will be soon!
Ghana apparently missing two key players - Boateng and Muntari. Good news for us.
easdog1;842328125 said:
Ghana apparently missing two key players - Boateng and Muntari. Good news for us.
Before I heard that news I figured Ghana would win by a few goals. Now, hearing that I don't know what is going on.
Best possible outcome:
Ghana and Portugal tie
Second best possible outcome:
Portugal wins by 1 goal
dajo9;842328126 said:
Before I heard that news I figured Ghana would win by a few goals. Now, hearing that I don't know what is going on.
Best possible outcome:
Ghana and Portugal tie
Second best possible outcome:
Portugal wins by 1 goal
What?????
Best possible outcome is we kick the shyte out of Germany and who cares about the Ghana-Portugal game.
easdog1;842328125 said:
Ghana apparently missing two key players - Boateng and Muntari. Good news for us.
Muntari was already out from yellow cards. Boateng is a loss.
andilise;842328128 said:
What?????
Best possible outcome is we kick the shyte out of Germany and who cares about the Ghana-Portugal game.
Well, yes, but I was speaking of outcomes for the Portugal / Ghana game. Sorry, wrong thread I guess.
Oh crap why is Omar Gonzalez starting? :0
U-s-a, u-s-a!
Deutschland with the funky stripes today, so the US in whites.
Bad weather, wet heavy field = better for US
Bad weather, wet heavy field = better for US
Ghana in turmoil, Boateng and Muntari expelled from their team, this opens up the door for Portugal in case the US loses today, because if Ghana phones it in, Portugal could easily score 3 or 4 goals.
Lol at Ann Coulter:
"If more "Americans" are watching soccer today, it's only because of the demographic switch effected by Teddy Kennedy's 1965 immigration law. I promise you: No American whose great-grandfather was born here is watching soccer. One can only hope that, in addition to learning English, these new Americans will drop their soccer fetish with time."
http://www.clarionledger.com/story/opinion/columnists/2014/06/25/coulter-growing-interest-soccer-sign-nations-moral-decay/11372137/
"If more "Americans" are watching soccer today, it's only because of the demographic switch effected by Teddy Kennedy's 1965 immigration law. I promise you: No American whose great-grandfather was born here is watching soccer. One can only hope that, in addition to learning English, these new Americans will drop their soccer fetish with time."
http://www.clarionledger.com/story/opinion/columnists/2014/06/25/coulter-growing-interest-soccer-sign-nations-moral-decay/11372137/
Cal88;842328171 said:
Lol at Ann Coulter:
"If more "Americans" are watching soccer today, it's only because of the demographic switch effected by Teddy Kennedy's 1965 immigration law. I promise you: No American whose great-grandfather was born here is watching soccer. One can only hope that, in addition to learning English, these new Americans will drop their soccer fetish with time."
http://www.clarionledger.com/story/opinion/columnists/2014/06/25/coulter-growing-interest-soccer-sign-nations-moral-decay/11372137/
My mother and father born in Europe so I guess that explains why I'm watching. Better question is why are you reading Ann Coulter?
"If the Portugal result holds, the US would have to lose by 5 goals to not advance."
Looking good so far -- USA-Germany scoreless at the half and Ghana down 1-0 to Portugal.
510Bear;842328178 said:
"If the Portugal result holds, the US would have to lose by 5 goals to not advance."
If Portugal scores again though, it becomes a more plausible scenario. Example: if the US loses 2-0 and Portugal wins 3-0, Portugal is through.
Cal88;842328181 said:
If Portugal scores again though, it becomes a more plausible scenario. Example: if the US loses 2-0 and Portugal wins 3-0, Portugal is through.
Hard to see Germany opening themselves up enough to score more than one goal, though. They know the math too and that they don't have to score.
dajo9;842328126 said:
Before I heard that news I figured Ghana would win by a few goals. Now, hearing that I don't know what is going on.
What was even weirder was the report that Ghana was going to fly $3 million cash into Brazil to give to their players. I'm pretty sure you can't do that amount of money in cash across most international borders.
Cal88;842328171 said:
Lol at Ann Coulter:
"If more "Americans" are watching soccer today, it's only because of the demographic switch effected by Teddy Kennedy's 1965 immigration law. I promise you: No American whose great-grandfather was born here is watching soccer. One can only hope that, in addition to learning English, these new Americans will drop their soccer fetish with time."
http://www.clarionledger.com/story/opinion/columnists/2014/06/25/coulter-growing-interest-soccer-sign-nations-moral-decay/11372137/
I know Ann Coulter is a moron and all, but she's not the only one I've seen express similar sentiments.
I have to say that I just don't get it. If you are a true patriot, wouldn't you want your country to do as well as possible in every sport? I don't understand how people obsessed with being "Real 'Muricans" would want the USA to again become bad at soccer.
sycasey;842328184 said:
I know Ann Coulter is a moron and all, but she's not the only one I've seen express similar sentiments.
Always wanted to meet her just so I could say "why the long face?"
She looks like Secretariat.
So Klinsmann is clogging the middle in the back and forcing Germany to go through the flanks with the crosses, that's why Gonzales is in, and so far he's done a very good job I think. That's also why Low put Klose, he's a good poacher on the crosses. That's clearly been the strategy early in teh 2nd half.
Cal88;842328181 said:
If Portugal scores again though, it becomes a more plausible scenario. Example: if the US loses 2-0 and Portugal wins 3-0, Portugal is through.
I believe in that case both portugal and usa would have the same differential and number of goals, so it would mean 'drawing lots'.
portugal winning 3-0 and USA losing 0-2 would mean portugal through. That's a lot of goals for the 2nd half.
now ghana winning is a big problem.
ah...crap.
So if Nigeria wins 2-1 and Germany beats US 1-0, what happens?
bearlybobo;842328193 said:
ah...crap.
USA lucky to be down 1 goal
ducky23;842328194 said:
So if Nigeria wins 2-1 and Germany beats US 1-0, what happens?
ghana would have the same goal differential and more total goals.
portugal scoring again would be really good. because right now germany is really taking it to us. they have extra rest and didn't play in menaus.
sorry meant Ghana, shows how much I know about soccer. I am a 3rd generation American, so what can you expect?
If only there were an apt name for these lightning fast offensive invasive maneuvers the Germans employ.
bearlybobo;842328199 said:
If only there were an apt name for these lightning fast offensive invasive maneuvers the Germans employ.
we aren't the french
Yes at this point if Ghana wins and the US loses, Ghana is most likely through (unles the US loses by something like 3-2, not likely). Right now the US is one Ghana goal away from elimination.
Ronaldo almost drew a PK. And instead he's limping. Damnit.
Ronaldo comes through, 2-1 Portugal, US is in!
Featured Stories
See All
From Physicality to Bagels: Meet Cal's inside linebacker room
by Joaquin Ruiz
Cal Football Spring Game Set For April 18
by Cal Athletics
4 Star Sierra Canyon Safety Myles Baker Commits to Cal
by Jim McGill
The Benson Blog - Postseason Awards
by Rod Benson