Bears in Corvallis Game Thread

37,011 Views | 488 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Strykur
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just pathetic call
JSC 76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 punts, avg 34.8 yds. That's pretty terrible.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oregon State has ditched running and doing roll out play action.
metabear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Defense doesn't have a clue who has the ball.<yeah interception >
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
0-2 here we come! Glad this whole year has an asterisk
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

LunchTime said:

82gradDLSdad said:

I love that the announcer said we played close to a perfect half. 20-14 vs OSU. I guess this means low ceiling for us if this is a perfect half for us.
they had three good plays. Two TDs and a 4th down INT.
.

Oh for God sake, 20-14 on OSU. I know we have starters out. I know they only had a few good plays. We played well but not close to perfect. I guess I've watched too much DLS over the years. We played a decent to good first half. I expect us to do that.
Calm down dude.

It was what they said (I added the INT). LMFAO
oursdor
How long do you want to ignore this user?

luckily OSU real bad
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Time to capitalize.
RonO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good pick
Troll On You Bears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There is hope.
minkjr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hicks interception!
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

82gradDLSdad said:

LunchTime said:

82gradDLSdad said:

I love that the announcer said we played close to a perfect half. 20-14 vs OSU. I guess this means low ceiling for us if this is a perfect half for us.
they had three good plays. Two TDs and a 4th down INT.
.

Oh for God sake, 20-14 on OSU. I know we have starters out. I know they only had a few good plays. We played well but not close to perfect. I guess I've watched too much DLS over the years. We played a decent to good first half. I expect us to do that.
Calm down dude.

It was what they said (I added the INT). LMFAO


Yah I'm all fired up. Almost perfectly fired up.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whoops
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Getting gifts from the refs now.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The piped in booing is flipping hilarious
Chapman_is_Gone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Troll On You Bears said:

Getting that sinking feeling. Beavs are more creative, more focused, better coached in the second half. We are going into the fourth playing tight which ain't good.
I'd much prefer that the Beavers were tight.
ncbears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First and goal and run run rum. Ugh
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Give up on the power run game please
Troll On You Bears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

Troll On You Bears said:

Getting that sinking feeling. Beavs are more creative, more focused, better coached in the second half. We are going into the fourth playing tight which ain't good.
I'd much prefer that the Beavers were tight.
Amen
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This OL is really terrible.
killa22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fat_slice said:

Give up on the power run game please


This is painful to watch.

This scheme is just weak
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Beavers grabbing way too much.
killa22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gift a new set of downs.

/Immediately lines up in a heavy formation and runs the same play action flood.

Instead of doing what got you the flag.
Troll On You Bears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
killa22 said:

fat_slice said:

Give up on the power run game please


This is painful to watch.

This scheme is just weak
Honestly, I look forward to your explanation post-game. I know you talked about it after UCLA but I'd like to hear it explained again. I do get the sense that you are an Air Raid or spread guy so I guess I would (respectfully) ask that you try and take a neutral approach to your criticism.
RonO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bears TD for the lead
metabear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We seem to have only 2 plays. But we scored.
ncbears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:

This OL is really terrible.
. Not really their fault
JSC 76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How many non scoring plays from inside the 10 have we run today? 5? 8?
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good TE routes again.
killa22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's like forcing the issue. We will score on this flood play action!
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
metabear said:

We seem to have only 2 plays. But we scored.
When Oregon State sells out on the run we always have a TE open.
hanky1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll say this: this has been a good game. Multiple lead changes. Fun game
Troll On You Bears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hanky1 said:

I'll say this: this has been a good game. Multiple lead changes. Fun game
Agree. What's a game without at least some agony?
kirklandblue
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good play for the touchdown but Garbers (or should I say Musgrave) rollouts/bootlegs are making me unsettled.
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
killa22 said:

Again pressure vs full slide. This scheme is too susceptible.



Killa, I need to pick your brain on the slide blocking scheme. I remember Tedford using it and then not seeing it since. Maybe after the game you can do a bit of a brain dump on this. I'm sure MinotStBeav could do a core dump on this topic too.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.