Joel Brown

5,023 Views | 29 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by bearister
LudwigsFountain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is it just my rose colored glasses or does Joel tend to come up big when things are on the line at the end of games? Unexpected 3's, relentless defense and all around hustle. Sure he clinked a couple of free throws yesterday but he also took a key charge. He's one of my favorites.
BeachedBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I like him a lot. I think watching his development through this season and into next is a key metric for this staff. Joel has all the tools but he needs to improve his shooting and related confidence? to be a true P12 level PG. His D is pretty much there and his assists/turnovers seems to be as much on his teammates as him - so I'm not too concerned in that facet.

In a perfect world, he would really focus on his 3pg and FT% before next season. I really like having a lock down perimeter defender who is also a perimeter threat.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LudwigsFountain said:

Is it just my rose colored glasses or does Joel tend to come up big when things are on the line at the end of games? Unexpected 3's, relentless defense and all around hustle. Sure he clinked a couple of free throws yesterday but he also took a key charge. He's one of my favorites.
I've mentioned the same sentiments several times in the past and I am sticking to it.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks for starting this thread. Joel Brown has gone from being a player I thought should see as little PT as possible to one of our most effective. Credit to him and to Fox and the staff.
helltopay1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
brown is living proof that you can be a good player even though you can't shoot...He can, however, drive, and sometimes that results in a basket...
LateHit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Significantly less stressful watching him handle the ball since last year.
Especially on crucial possessions.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BeachedBear said:

I like him a lot. I think watching his development through this season and into next is a key metric for this staff. Joel has all the tools but he needs to improve his shooting and related confidence? to be a true P12 level PG. His D is pretty much there and his assists/turnovers seems to be as much on his teammates as him - so I'm not too concerned in that facet.

In a perfect world, he would really focus on his 3pg and FT% before next season. I really like having a lock down perimeter defender who is also a perimeter threat.
I agree. The only thing I would add that needs improving, would be on-court decisions as to when to drive, and when not to drive. We have all used the term, "shot selection", when referring to shooters deciding when they should take a shot. I'll coin a new one for Brown, and everyone, really, which is "drive selection". Deciding when to penetrate. Brown has tremendous speed, and often thinks he can blow by a defender, and he is often right about that. But often he does not see and gauge the size, quickness, and reaction time of other defenders near the basket. He does not always seem to see or know how the defense might collapse on him and cause a steal, a turnover, a tied-up ball, a stuffed shot, a pass that is intercepted or batted loose. Many of his drives end up in a wasted possession, precisely because of driving when he should maybe choose a better option, and wait for a more suitable moment to drive.

At Cal, you never saw Jason Kidd make a foray into the lane and not have an idea of his options before going in to that hostile territory, and he very seldom turned the ball over near the basket. He just seemed to sense what everyone was going to do, and what his best options were, and he usually picked one that would result in a basket.

Jason Kidd had an edge over Brown, in that he had experienced centers and forwards on his Cal teams who knew where to go to get open or set screens for Jason, and were presenting lots of problems themselves for the defenders who might be thinking of leaving them alone and helping out to defend Jason. Joel Brown needs a point guard's vision, able to see the whole floor, the other 9 players out there, and size up the possibilities. I am one who thinks great point guards are born, not made, but with experience and coaching, I think Brown can become a good point guard. He has tools, competitiveness, aggressiveness, and he is very young. Kidd was a pass-first point guard, and so it was natural for him to always look at the whole floor, to see who might get open. Brown is a defense first point guard, and on offense, he is more of a shoot-first point guard, and needs to train himself to look more for openings to pass. And Fox needs to show his bigs how to get open near the basket more often, and when to get out of the way, draw their defenders away from Brown's lane to the basket, and how to set picks for Brown. Tall order, but many of Cal's players are good enough athletes to learn this.
south bender
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Excellent, SFCB!

SB
BeachedBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

BeachedBear said:

I like him a lot. I think watching his development through this season and into next is a key metric for this staff. Joel has all the tools but he needs to improve his shooting and related confidence? to be a true P12 level PG. His D is pretty much there and his assists/turnovers seems to be as much on his teammates as him - so I'm not too concerned in that facet.

In a perfect world, he would really focus on his 3pg and FT% before next season. I really like having a lock down perimeter defender who is also a perimeter threat.
I agree. The only thing I would add that needs improving, would be on-court decisions as to when to drive, and when not to drive. We have all used the term, "shot selection", when referring to shooters deciding when they should take a shot. I'll coin a new one for Brown, and everyone, really, which is "drive selection". Deciding when to penetrate. Brown has tremendous speed, and often thinks he can blow by a defender, and he is often right about that. But often he does not see and gauge the size, quickness, and reaction time of other defenders near the basket. He does not always seem to see or know how the defense might collapse on him and cause a steal, a turnover, a tied-up ball, a stuffed shot, a pass that is intercepted or batted loose. Many of his drives end up in a wasted possession, precisely because of driving when he should maybe choose a better option, and wait for a more suitable moment to drive.

At Cal, you never saw Jason Kidd make a foray into the lane and not have an idea of his options before going in to that hostile territory, and he very seldom turned the ball over near the basket. He just seemed to sense what everyone was going to do, and what his best options were, and he usually picked one that would result in a basket.

Jason Kidd had an edge over Brown, in that he had experienced centers and forwards on his Cal teams who knew where to go to get open or set screens for Jason, and were presenting lots of problems themselves for the defenders who might be thinking of leaving them alone and helping out to defend Jason. Joel Brown needs a point guard's vision, able to see the whole floor, the other 9 players out there, and size up the possibilities. I am one who thinks great point guards are born, not made, but with experience and coaching, I think Brown can become a good point guard. He has tools, competitiveness, aggressiveness, and he is very young. Kidd was a pass-first point guard, and so it was natural for him to always look at the whole floor, to see who might get open. Brown is a defense first point guard, and on offense, he is more of a shoot-first point guard, and needs to train himself to look more for openings to pass. And Fox needs to show his bigs how to get open near the basket more often, and when to get out of the way, draw their defenders away from Brown's lane to the basket, and how to set picks for Brown. Tall order, but many of Cal's players are good enough athletes to learn this.
Yeah - that whole court vision (or field vision) is a mystical combination of nature & nurture. I think Joel has it - but not at the J Kidd level. Jorge was probably at Joel level as a Freshman, but improved a lot during his 4 years at Cal. Ubaka was another who seemed to improve his court vision in college.

But joel can be a good P12 PG. I also like your point about his speed combined with drive selection. Maybe he just needs to slow down a bit and get more reps with his team mates.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
" Jason Kidd had an edge over Brown, in that he had experienced centers and forwards on his Cal teams who knew where to go to get open or set screens for Jason..."

That and the small detail that J Kidd is one of the best players that ever laced them up.

Number of triple doubles:

Oscar Robertson 181
Russell Westbrook 146
Magic Johnson 138
Jason Kidd 107
LeBron James 94
Wilt Chamberlain 78
Larry Bird 59
James Harden 46
Fat Lever 43
Nikola Jokic 41
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BeachedBear said:

SFCityBear said:

BeachedBear said:

I like him a lot. I think watching his development through this season and into next is a key metric for this staff. Joel has all the tools but he needs to improve his shooting and related confidence? to be a true P12 level PG. His D is pretty much there and his assists/turnovers seems to be as much on his teammates as him - so I'm not too concerned in that facet.

In a perfect world, he would really focus on his 3pg and FT% before next season. I really like having a lock down perimeter defender who is also a perimeter threat.
I agree. The only thing I would add that needs improving, would be on-court decisions as to when to drive, and when not to drive. We have all used the term, "shot selection", when referring to shooters deciding when they should take a shot. I'll coin a new one for Brown, and everyone, really, which is "drive selection". Deciding when to penetrate. Brown has tremendous speed, and often thinks he can blow by a defender, and he is often right about that. But often he does not see and gauge the size, quickness, and reaction time of other defenders near the basket. He does not always seem to see or know how the defense might collapse on him and cause a steal, a turnover, a tied-up ball, a stuffed shot, a pass that is intercepted or batted loose. Many of his drives end up in a wasted possession, precisely because of driving when he should maybe choose a better option, and wait for a more suitable moment to drive.

At Cal, you never saw Jason Kidd make a foray into the lane and not have an idea of his options before going in to that hostile territory, and he very seldom turned the ball over near the basket. He just seemed to sense what everyone was going to do, and what his best options were, and he usually picked one that would result in a basket.

Jason Kidd had an edge over Brown, in that he had experienced centers and forwards on his Cal teams who knew where to go to get open or set screens for Jason, and were presenting lots of problems themselves for the defenders who might be thinking of leaving them alone and helping out to defend Jason. Joel Brown needs a point guard's vision, able to see the whole floor, the other 9 players out there, and size up the possibilities. I am one who thinks great point guards are born, not made, but with experience and coaching, I think Brown can become a good point guard. He has tools, competitiveness, aggressiveness, and he is very young. Kidd was a pass-first point guard, and so it was natural for him to always look at the whole floor, to see who might get open. Brown is a defense first point guard, and on offense, he is more of a shoot-first point guard, and needs to train himself to look more for openings to pass. And Fox needs to show his bigs how to get open near the basket more often, and when to get out of the way, draw their defenders away from Brown's lane to the basket, and how to set picks for Brown. Tall order, but many of Cal's players are good enough athletes to learn this.
Yeah - that whole court vision (or field vision) is a mystical combination of nature & nurture. I think Joel has it - but not at the J Kidd level. Jorge was probably at Joel level as a Freshman, but improved a lot during his 4 years at Cal. Ubaka was another who seemed to improve his court vision in college.

But joel can be a good P12 PG. I also like your point about his speed combined with drive selection. Maybe he just needs to slow down a bit and get more reps with his team mates.
I agree with him slowing down some of the time. It must be hard for him to break the habit, because he has probably depended on his speed for years.

In a different situation, Cal had a player back in the 1960s, Denny Lewis, an outstanding high school point guard. He was also the city AAA low hurdles champion. In high school, he had fast teammates, and they ran a fast break offense with Denny bringing the ball up the middle and the two Feinberg twins running down the sideline as fast as Denny ran up the middle. He either took the ball to the basket or dished to one of them. They beat much taller teams that way. The year I played with him in a Rec league, Denny averaged 28 points and over 10 assists. At Cal the team was very slow, and Denny would take off on the break with the ball, and when he got to the other end, he was 15-20 feet ahead of his teammates. If he was guarded, he pulled the ball back out and ran Herrerias' half court set offense. I don't know why Cal recruited him if they didn't recruit fast players to go with him. I guess a coach never has control over which players will finally signs with the team. And Herrerias was not a fast break coach, so I never understood why Denny would sign with Cal. Hopefully Bowser and Kuany, who both have speed, and some new recruits may develop some skills and Brown can run a fast break with them.

In the halfcourt, the Cal bigs who are likely to be around the basket when Brown drives in there are not quick or quick-reacting. I missed the Colorado because I forgot the time. I recorded Utah, but found that Comcast shorted me by not including ESPNU when I asked for it, so it never did get recorded. How did Hyder do in those games? He seems to know what to do when he drives, sometimes hesitating, waiting for an opening or for a teammate to get open. The games I've seen, he did not seem to look for teammates a lot, but I could be wrong about that. In any case, Brown may need to use the old cliche, "slow down and let the game come to him" some of the time when he drives, and just use his speed when he is sure he can get a high percentage shot.
SFCityBear
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

" Jason Kidd had an edge over Brown, in that he had experienced centers and forwards on his Cal teams who knew where to go to get open or set screens for Jason..."

That and the small detail that J Kidd is one of the best players that ever laced them up.

Number of triple doubles:

Oscar Robertson 181
Russell Westbrook 146
Magic Johnson 138
Jason Kidd 107
LeBron James 94
Wilt Chamberlain 78
Larry Bird 59
James Harden 46
Fat Lever 43
Nikola Jokic 41
I guess you know that I was just talking about one aspect of Jason Kidd. Brown isn't Kidd, but with time, he might become an elite defender as well. Jason was one of the two best defenders at the guard spot that I ever saw. The other was KC Jones.
SFCityBear
helltopay1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oscar conserved his energy on defense. He played defense only when he wanted to. .
helltopay1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
herrerrias was a very good coach, but he was not beloved by his players. He also was not a very good recruiter. He and Pete Newell had a falling out because newell advised Herrerrias that he was going to fire him if he did not voluntarily leave the team. I don't know if they ever connected as friends again.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BeachedBear said:

I like him a lot. I think watching his development through this season and into next is a key metric for this staff. Joel has all the tools but he needs to improve his shooting and related confidence?

In a perfect world, he would really focus on his 3pg and FT% before next season. I really like having a lock down perimeter defender who is also a perimeter threat.


He is actually shooting .353 from 3 this year, which is huge, it means teams can't sag off him like last year. He is still under .500 on FTs which is hard to fathom.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
good comments SF

I've said Brown only has one speed and it gets him in trouble

He typically uses his speed and quickness to blow by his man. But often his defender would stay with him and he'd have to take a 5 foot runner from the side of the basket going full speed and heading out of bounds. High degree of difficulty with zero options.

but the last 2-3 games I've seen improvement. he's slowing down and has been more shifty.

Example was a play Brown made a couple of games ago. He drove into the paint, stopped, pivoted looking for a kickout... then he pivoted again and the defenders got completely turned around. Brown scored on an easy short shot

PGs should watch Remy to see how the use of deception/shiftiness instead of speed can be more effective as change of speed really makes a player unpredictable and hard to defend. It also allows the PG more time to see the court and make controlled decisions


SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

BeachedBear said:

I like him a lot. I think watching his development through this season and into next is a key metric for this staff. Joel has all the tools but he needs to improve his shooting and related confidence?

In a perfect world, he would really focus on his 3pg and FT% before next season. I really like having a lock down perimeter defender who is also a perimeter threat.


He is actually shooting .353 from 3 this year, which is huge, it means teams can't sag off him like last year. He is still under .500 on FTs which is hard to fathom.

You are right that Brown has improved his shooting percentage by a huge amount this year, but his sample size is very small. He has only made 6 threes in 15 games. On a per 40 minute basis he shoots only 1.7 attempts, the lowest number of attempts on the Cal team among the players who do attempt threes. For comparison, per 40 minutes:

Foreman 9.9
Betley 7.4
Bradley 6.7
Hyder 6.0
Celestine 5.4
Anticevich 4.0
Kuany 2.9
Klonaras 2.5
Bowser 2.0
Brown 1.7

Brown only averages 27 minutes per game, so he he is only really taking one three point attempt per game. I doubt that teams are guarding him any closer than last season, when he also averaged only 1.7 attempts per 40 minutes. Let's watch more closely, to see if you are right. I think teams concentrate on stopping the volume shooters who shoot good percentages. If teams are sagging off any Cal starter other than Brown, I'd guess it might be Bradley, whose percentage has dropped to a very poor (for him) 0.318 from 0.384 last season. He is in a serious slump, and teams won't need to guard him tightly, until he starts making him.

I think if Fox had confidence in Brown, he'd be telling him to shoot more threes. Maybe he has told him, but maybe Brown doesn't feel comfortable doing it just yet.

Free throws: Brown does not have a good-looking stroke, nothing that looks very repeatable. Free throws are mental, more than anything. If his problem is mental, with no fans in the house, behind the basket, in his face, then he could shoot them worse next season when the crowds come back to the arenas. Hopefully he fixes this soon.
SFCityBear
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

calumnus said:

BeachedBear said:

I like him a lot. I think watching his development through this season and into next is a key metric for this staff. Joel has all the tools but he needs to improve his shooting and related confidence?

In a perfect world, he would really focus on his 3pg and FT% before next season. I really like having a lock down perimeter defender who is also a perimeter threat.


He is actually shooting .353 from 3 this year, which is huge, it means teams can't sag off him like last year. He is still under .500 on FTs which is hard to fathom.

You are right that Brown has improved his shooting percentage by a huge amount this year, but his sample size is very small. He has only made 6 threes in 15 games. On a per 40 minute basis he shoots only 1.7 attempts, the lowest number of attempts on the Cal team among the players who do attempt threes. For comparison, per 40 minutes:

Foreman 9.9
Betley 7.4
Bradley 6.7
Hyder 6.0
Celestine 5.4
Anticevich 4.0
Kuany 2.9
Klonaras 2.5
Bowser 2.0
Brown 1.7

Brown only averages 27 minutes per game, so he he is only really taking one three point attempt per game. I doubt that teams are guarding him any closer than last season, when he also averaged only 1.7 attempts per 40 minutes. Let's watch more closely, to see if you are right. I think teams concentrate on stopping the volume shooters who shoot good percentages. If teams are sagging off any Cal starter other than Brown, I'd guess it might be Bradley, whose percentage has dropped to a very poor (for him) 0.318 from 0.384 last season. He is in a serious slump, and teams won't need to guard him tightly, until he starts making him.

I think if Fox had confidence in Brown, he'd be telling him to shoot more threes. Maybe he has told him, but maybe Brown doesn't feel comfortable doing it just yet.

Free throws: Brown does not have a good-looking stroke, nothing that looks very repeatable. Free throws are mental, more than anything. If his problem is mental, with no fans in the house, behind the basket, in his face, then he could shoot them worse next season when the crowds come back to the arenas. Hopefully he fixes this soon.


Yes it is a small sample size. My point is that at a minimum, a PG needs to be able to hit a decent percentage from 3 if the defender sags off him or if left undefended. We have had PGs in the past who could not. Brown last year could not. It appears now that he can. I am not asking for him to shoot more per se, but to keep the defense honest and make the defense pay if he is left open from three. That could be zero times in a game. Which just means the defense is defending him out to three which eliminates the ability to double team others, opens up his driving and passing. It is huge, even if it doesn't show up as 3 point shots made by him, it shows up as wins.
helltopay1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DNA cannot be overlooked. Against Utah, brown, a small PG and Celestine, a wing player, played roughly the same amount of minutes. Brown had 5 rebounds, and, Celestine had none. small sample size, but, I;'ll bet this stat will. be pretty consistent throughout the season. BTW, I like celestines'stroke from beyond the arc. having a good perimeter shooter today is just so important. It allows your drivers to drive.
59bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've been hopeful of Brown from the start. His speed is a rare asset, he's a plus defender, he can handle the ball and is a better passer than many give him credit for, sometimes losing assists because his passes are fumbled or good shots are missed. Maybe I'm seeing what I want to see but I think his decision making is getting better. Clearly, he needs to be more reliable at the FT line.
Alkiadt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
helltopay1 said:

herrerrias was a very good coach, but he was not beloved by his players. He also was not a very good recruiter. He and Pete Newell had a falling out because newell advised Herrerrias that he was going to fire him if he did not voluntarily leave the team. I don't know if they ever connected as friends again.


Not completely correct.
Sorry, I know both families.
And if you know your Cal Basketball history, 10 players lead by Russ Critchfield walked out in support of Herrerias during the Presley issues. He had support from many of his players, obviously not Presley. It was a difficult time for everyone, and Rene was of course disappointed and forced out due to the times, but there was never a "falling out". Both were too classy for that. They remained friends.
helltopay1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
herrerrias was not beloved totally when he coached at SI either...He was always aloof..didn't hesitate to cut many good players even though no harm would have been caused if they had simply languished on the bench.
Benny Neff of Lowell had some redeeming features...one feature was that he never cut a SINGLE player the whole time I was there...Even if they were terrible, they suited up..and, in blow-out games, he allowed them to play. This was also true for the lightweight teams he coached.
He was/is a very smart man. He played for Woolpert and Newell. In addition, he possessed a very high IQ. Taught History & typing at SI.
Your experience at Cal was different than mine. I once talked to a African-american reserve guard who played for Herrerrias. He told me that none of the blacks liked Herrerrias. .I guess different folks have different experiences. We should probably leave it at that...Some of the players he cut at SI could have started for other high schools. I know many of them personally.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Joel Brown leads Cal in 3 point % at .455 (10 of 22)

SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Joel Brown leads Cal in 3 point % at .455 (10 of 22)


Brown's percentage is very good, but his sample size is so small that his threes are almost irrelevant in terms of affecting the results of the team as a whole. He has only 22 attempts, as you wrote, but on a per 40 minute basis, no one in the usual rotation shoots fewer three point attempts than Brown, except Kelly with 3 total attempts this season and Lars with none. I also think if Brown was really a 45% shooter that Fox could trust, Fox would be insisting he shoot a lot more attempts than one per game, which is what Brown has been shooting this season. A walkon taking up minutes in a blowout can put up one three in a game. Nick Kerr put up about one attempt per game at Cal. He played a total of 11 minutes over 7 games in 2016, put up 6 three point attempts and made 3, shooting .500 in mostly garbage time. I don't remember if any of his threes affected a game, but most did not.

Brown needs to improve his free throw shooting, and he needs to improve his ability to get to the line. He is too easy to defend in the paint, and until he learns to finish better or make an assist when he penetrates, teams won't foul him enough to make those drives more profitable. I'm pleased with his improvement this year, but I would caution to make too much out of his percentage on threes. If he could, say, double or triple his attempts per game, and shoot them at the same percentage, then we would start to have something. That depends on Fox incorporating more three point shots for him in the offense, and Brown being willing to shoot more of them.
SFCityBear
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

calumnus said:

Joel Brown leads Cal in 3 point % at .455 (10 of 22)


Brown's percentage is very good, but his sample size is so small that his threes are almost irrelevant in terms of affecting the results of the team as a whole. He has only 22 attempts, as you wrote, but on a per 40 minute basis, no one in the usual rotation shoots fewer three point attempts than Brown, except Kelly with 3 total attempts this season and Lars with none. I also think if Brown was really a 45% shooter that Fox could trust, Fox would be insisting he shoot a lot more attempts than one per game, which is what Brown has been shooting this season. A walkon taking up minutes in a blowout can put up one three in a game. Nick Kerr put up about one attempt per game at Cal. He played a total of 11 minutes over 7 games in 2016, put up 6 three point attempts and made 3, shooting .500 in mostly garbage time. I don't remember if any of his threes affected a game, but most did not.

Brown needs to improve his free throw shooting, and he needs to improve his ability to get to the line. He is too easy to defend in the paint, and until he learns to finish better or make an assist when he penetrates, teams won't foul him enough to make those drives more profitable. I'm pleased with his improvement this year, but I would caution to make too much out of his percentage on threes. If he could, say, double or triple his attempts per game, and shoot them at the same percentage, then we would start to have something. That depends on Fox incorporating more three point shots for him in the offense, and Brown being willing to shoot more of them.


So you are saying that rather than improvement it is just luck?
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

calumnus said:

Joel Brown leads Cal in 3 point % at .455 (10 of 22)


Brown's percentage is very good, but his sample size is so small that his threes are almost irrelevant in terms of affecting the results of the team as a whole. He has only 22 attempts, as you wrote, but on a per 40 minute basis, no one in the usual rotation shoots fewer three point attempts than Brown, except Kelly with 3 total attempts this season and Lars with none. I also think if Brown was really a 45% shooter that Fox could trust, Fox would be insisting he shoot a lot more attempts than one per game, which is what Brown has been shooting this season. A walkon taking up minutes in a blowout can put up one three in a game. Nick Kerr put up about one attempt per game at Cal. He played a total of 11 minutes over 7 games in 2016, put up 6 three point attempts and made 3, shooting .500 in mostly garbage time. I don't remember if any of his threes affected a game, but most did not.

Brown needs to improve his free throw shooting, and he needs to improve his ability to get to the line. He is too easy to defend in the paint, and until he learns to finish better or make an assist when he penetrates, teams won't foul him enough to make those drives more profitable. I'm pleased with his improvement this year, but I would caution to make too much out of his percentage on threes. If he could, say, double or triple his attempts per game, and shoot them at the same percentage, then we would start to have something. That depends on Fox incorporating more three point shots for him in the offense, and Brown being willing to shoot more of them.
Brown only (and should only) shoot wide open 3s.

This is key so that teams don't completely collapse down when he is on the perimeter.

That's why his high percent is important to this team, and kudos for him to improve his long range shooting. We've won at least one game because he hit a clutch 3 pointer near the end of the game
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

SFCityBear said:

calumnus said:

Joel Brown leads Cal in 3 point % at .455 (10 of 22)


Brown's percentage is very good, but his sample size is so small that his threes are almost irrelevant in terms of affecting the results of the team as a whole. He has only 22 attempts, as you wrote, but on a per 40 minute basis, no one in the usual rotation shoots fewer three point attempts than Brown, except Kelly with 3 total attempts this season and Lars with none. I also think if Brown was really a 45% shooter that Fox could trust, Fox would be insisting he shoot a lot more attempts than one per game, which is what Brown has been shooting this season. A walkon taking up minutes in a blowout can put up one three in a game. Nick Kerr put up about one attempt per game at Cal. He played a total of 11 minutes over 7 games in 2016, put up 6 three point attempts and made 3, shooting .500 in mostly garbage time. I don't remember if any of his threes affected a game, but most did not.

Brown needs to improve his free throw shooting, and he needs to improve his ability to get to the line. He is too easy to defend in the paint, and until he learns to finish better or make an assist when he penetrates, teams won't foul him enough to make those drives more profitable. I'm pleased with his improvement this year, but I would caution to make too much out of his percentage on threes. If he could, say, double or triple his attempts per game, and shoot them at the same percentage, then we would start to have something. That depends on Fox incorporating more three point shots for him in the offense, and Brown being willing to shoot more of them.


So you are saying that rather than improvement it is just luck?
SFCityBear
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

SFCityBear said:

calumnus said:

Joel Brown leads Cal in 3 point % at .455 (10 of 22)


Brown's percentage is very good, but his sample size is so small that his threes are almost irrelevant in terms of affecting the results of the team as a whole. He has only 22 attempts, as you wrote, but on a per 40 minute basis, no one in the usual rotation shoots fewer three point attempts than Brown, except Kelly with 3 total attempts this season and Lars with none. I also think if Brown was really a 45% shooter that Fox could trust, Fox would be insisting he shoot a lot more attempts than one per game, which is what Brown has been shooting this season. A walkon taking up minutes in a blowout can put up one three in a game. Nick Kerr put up about one attempt per game at Cal. He played a total of 11 minutes over 7 games in 2016, put up 6 three point attempts and made 3, shooting .500 in mostly garbage time. I don't remember if any of his threes affected a game, but most did not.

Brown needs to improve his free throw shooting, and he needs to improve his ability to get to the line. He is too easy to defend in the paint, and until he learns to finish better or make an assist when he penetrates, teams won't foul him enough to make those drives more profitable. I'm pleased with his improvement this year, but I would caution to make too much out of his percentage on threes. If he could, say, double or triple his attempts per game, and shoot them at the same percentage, then we would start to have something. That depends on Fox incorporating more three point shots for him in the offense, and Brown being willing to shoot more of them.


So you are saying that rather than improvement it is just luck?
Oh no, not at all. I think it probably is improvement, because the games I've seen, his threes are on the mark or a little off. Not airballs or shots off the backboard, that were probably not intended to go in off the backboard, but did. That is luck. And that was Brown last season sometimes. And Brown looks better shooting the three. When your misses are on the inside of the rim almost every time, you are a good shooter. You are zeroed in on the target. Brown might even be equal to or better than our best shooters, because he is only taking one attempt per game, and that is hard to do. If you take several attempts in a game, you can get hot or go ice cold, but you are at least getting warmed up. Brown never knows ahead of time when he is going to take that one shot, and the good thing about it is, the defense doesn't know when he is going to take it either.
SFCityBear
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

SFCityBear said:

calumnus said:

Joel Brown leads Cal in 3 point % at .455 (10 of 22)


Brown's percentage is very good, but his sample size is so small that his threes are almost irrelevant in terms of affecting the results of the team as a whole. He has only 22 attempts, as you wrote, but on a per 40 minute basis, no one in the usual rotation shoots fewer three point attempts than Brown, except Kelly with 3 total attempts this season and Lars with none. I also think if Brown was really a 45% shooter that Fox could trust, Fox would be insisting he shoot a lot more attempts than one per game, which is what Brown has been shooting this season. A walkon taking up minutes in a blowout can put up one three in a game. Nick Kerr put up about one attempt per game at Cal. He played a total of 11 minutes over 7 games in 2016, put up 6 three point attempts and made 3, shooting .500 in mostly garbage time. I don't remember if any of his threes affected a game, but most did not.

Brown needs to improve his free throw shooting, and he needs to improve his ability to get to the line. He is too easy to defend in the paint, and until he learns to finish better or make an assist when he penetrates, teams won't foul him enough to make those drives more profitable. I'm pleased with his improvement this year, but I would caution to make too much out of his percentage on threes. If he could, say, double or triple his attempts per game, and shoot them at the same percentage, then we would start to have something. That depends on Fox incorporating more three point shots for him in the offense, and Brown being willing to shoot more of them.
Brown only (and should only) shoot wide open 3s.

This is key so that teams don't completely collapse down when he is on the perimeter.

That's why his high percent is important to this team, and kudos for him to improve his long range shooting. We've won at least one game because he hit a clutch 3 pointer near the end of the game

Good points.
SFCityBear
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

calumnus said:

SFCityBear said:

calumnus said:

Joel Brown leads Cal in 3 point % at .455 (10 of 22)


Brown's percentage is very good, but his sample size is so small that his threes are almost irrelevant in terms of affecting the results of the team as a whole. He has only 22 attempts, as you wrote, but on a per 40 minute basis, no one in the usual rotation shoots fewer three point attempts than Brown, except Kelly with 3 total attempts this season and Lars with none. I also think if Brown was really a 45% shooter that Fox could trust, Fox would be insisting he shoot a lot more attempts than one per game, which is what Brown has been shooting this season. A walkon taking up minutes in a blowout can put up one three in a game. Nick Kerr put up about one attempt per game at Cal. He played a total of 11 minutes over 7 games in 2016, put up 6 three point attempts and made 3, shooting .500 in mostly garbage time. I don't remember if any of his threes affected a game, but most did not.

Brown needs to improve his free throw shooting, and he needs to improve his ability to get to the line. He is too easy to defend in the paint, and until he learns to finish better or make an assist when he penetrates, teams won't foul him enough to make those drives more profitable. I'm pleased with his improvement this year, but I would caution to make too much out of his percentage on threes. If he could, say, double or triple his attempts per game, and shoot them at the same percentage, then we would start to have something. That depends on Fox incorporating more three point shots for him in the offense, and Brown being willing to shoot more of them.


So you are saying that rather than improvement it is just luck?
Oh no, not at all. I think it probably is improvement, because the games I've seen, his threes are on the mark or a little off. Not airballs or shots off the backboard, that were probably not intended to go in off the backboard, but did. That is luck. And that was Brown last season sometimes. And Brown looks better shooting the three. When your misses are on the inside of the rim almost every time, you are a good shooter. You are zeroed in on the target. Brown might even be equal to or better than our best shooters, because he is only taking one attempt per game, and that is hard to do. If you take several attempts in a game, you can get hot or go ice cold, but you are at least getting warmed up. Brown never knows ahead of time when he is going to take that one shot, and the good thing about it is, the defense doesn't know when he is going to take it either.
Just because I feel like picking at this scab, statistics guys have shown over and over again that there is no such thing as going hot or cold. There is only the statistical point that any binary thing that has a consistent likelihood of happening will sometimes happen in clumps and sometimes not happen in clumps. On average a 40% shooter who has made 4 shots in a row has been demonstrated to have a roughly 40% chance of making the next shot. Same shooter who has missed 4 in a row has roughly a 40% chance of making the next shot. Actually, statistics tend to show that the percentage goes down a tiny bit the more shots they make. Could be the shooter taking more risks. Could be the defense paying more attention. Could be statistical noise. The difference is really small.

Everyone insists on gut feeling this isn't true and coaches are criticized all the time for not passing to the hot hand or for subbing out the hot hand. However, the gauntlet has been thrown down by statisticians repeatedly challenging people to find evidence for the hot hand and no one has done it. Statistically, the right strategy in some cases might be to pass away from the hot hand.

Of course this does not mean that a 40% shooter might not become a 60% in a game because he has a favorable matchup and in such case the coach should feature that shooter more.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does that stat also apply to the slowhand?

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.