HoopDreams said:
OaktownBear said:
drizzlybear said:
Big C said:
LateHit said:
I watched every minute of the last two games and either the players are not listening or the coaches are not able to teach the basics.
Do not pass into the paint when your target is double or triple covered.
Do not dribble into the key against three defenders.
Take 30+ seconds if necessary to try to find a decent percentage shot. The number of garbage, early in the clock shots is inexcusable. And the misses are frequently WAY off target.
Figure out a way to inbound the ball from under your own basket without heaving it to half court.
The execution and common sense have regressed dramatically since last year.
I watched zero minutes of the last two games, despite having watched and enjoyed the victory against Colorado. At least I was not available to watch on Thursday. Tonight I just chose to not remember that there was a game. Now, I realize nobody gives a crap if I watch a Cal game or not. Just saying: Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ...
The only good thing I can think of about Cal Basketball this weekend is that we won't have to read Bear Insider posts claiming that Fox is actually a really good coach (he's so-so) or that anybody on the roster besides Bradley is really good just because they had 1-2 good games.
And that's not even that good, obviously, because I would actually prefer that we won more, even if it meant reading senseless hype. I am rooting for us to win, going forward (and backwards, if possible). If Fox can get things turned around, more power to him. We'll see how the program fares over the next 12-13 months.
I don't see anyone claiming Fox is a really good coach. I think the most support you see is that it's premature to conclude he's incapable of elevating the program to a level of stability and quality basketball.
I also don't think anyone says we have any really good players outside of Bradley.
What I see of the optimists on BI is basically what you're saying; i.e., "we'll see how the program fares over the next 12-13 months." I guess the only difference is that some of us haven't given up watching, and aren't basing our opinions on games we haven't seen.
1. No one with a modicum of sense needs to watch 3-15 or a 31 point loss to be able to formulate the obvious opinion that it is beyond repair. You guys have been in the monkey house so long you no longer notice the smell. Having people who have lost all objectivity and sense lord their masochism over others is just hilarious.
2. "No one is saying our coach doesn't suck but that doesn't mean we should fire him yet" is just a massively brilliant argument.
If it were up to you guys we'd be enjoying our 26th year of Tom Holmoe. Just to be clear, that is not a compliment as some of you probably see nothing wrong with that.
Here is a clue. BigC has been a loyal and extraordinary patient and reasonable Cal fan and poster for to my knowledge at least 21 years. He's never in the torch and pitchfork crowd. You took an asshat swipe at a guy who will be one of the last to leave. Enjoy the solitude when you have chased everyone else away.
so let see ...
#1 translates to everyone who doesn't agree with you and how you characterize the situation is a monkey
#2 -- so are you going to pay the buyout?
#2a translate to everyone who doesn't agree with you and how you characterize the situation also would support Tom Holmoe for 26 years ... ok, I'm starting to see a pattern here
#2b after calling everyone who doesn't agree with you or how you characterize the situation a monkey you call another poster an 'asshat' (what ever that is)
#3c and you say HE is chasing everyone else away?
1. Geez. I said they were in the monkey house, not that they were monkeys. This is a common phrase. It refers to when you walk in the monkey house, you get hit with the stench and think it stinks. The longer you stay in the monkey house, the more you get used to the smell until you don't notice it. It refers to humans. This is a common reference. I can't be responsible for you taking offense because you don't know it.
2. Oh eff that cop out bullshyte retort. Everything with you guys is a way to shut up all criticism. Did you want to keep Wyking? Did you pay his buyout? Have you paid any coach buyout ever? No one is required to have several million dollars to waste in order to have an opinion. Especially when they didn't support the stupid decision that now requires a buyout to correct
2a- we already see the pattern of the same arguments (including the bullshyte buyout retort) being used in support of every poor coaching hire. All these same arguments were made for Holmoe and others. The predictably is nauseating
2b didn't call anyone a monkey. Apparently you have never heard the term asshat either. Maybe spend less time watching bad basketball and more time in the world. Meanwhile you went after a very reasonable poster who posted very reasonable criticism because you have never been able to deal with any statements darker than an episode of My Little Pony. My response was not about people disagreeing with me. It was about drizzly taking a shot at BigC's opinion because he admitted he didn't watch the game. You didn't care about drizzly criticizing a poster because he takes the same Orange slices for everyone approach to college basketball that you do. If that is what you two want to do, fine. You can't expect it from the rest of us.
3c - I'll take the hit on that one. I didn't mean he would chase everyone away with his lame criticism. I meant the stupid strategy on coaching personnel would chase everyone away. (Pretty much already has). But that was entirely unclear at my part. That said, sorry, not sorry. It is quite clear that there are five or so of you that really enjoy your cloud cuckoo land bubble you have here where no one criticizes because the people that actually care about results have left. Dare I say, I think deep down you enjoy going 3-15 with rainbow bright posters rather than winning and having knowledgeable posters invade your bubble and breakdown games including a reasonable amount of criticism.