SFCityBear said:
stu said:
I can blame Fox for not having any players remotely qualified for the NBA draft.
Your are probably right, but it seems a lot to ask of a coach having been out of basketball for a year, then taking the Cal job and having only a couple of months to try and develop West Coast contacts, and sign his first class from players not already committed to other schools.
To me, this is still letting Fox (maybe Knowlton more) off the hook. If those things were actually harder for Fox, we should certainly be able to ask (1) why he was the choice, and (2) why he didn't come in with a better plan (i.e. an assistant with real California/west-coast recruiting ties).
Quote:
He did have a full year to recruit his 2nd class, so I'd base my criticism of Fox on what we saw last season, except that it was the year of Covid, and I can't evaluate this year's class until they actually play in games.
If only there were other 2nd year coaches around the country who also had to play during the year of Covid that we could maybe compare Fox with to see how they were progressing. But unfortunately, only Fox was in that position, so I guess we'll never know if maybe he could have done better </sarcasm>.
Quote:
Of the players from 2018-19 that Fox failed to keep, I doubt that any of them would have been qualified for the NBA either.
Those players would have contributed *significantly* to our team being considerably better than we were. Sueing was a key contributor to a very strong OSU team that challenged for the league title in a conference with 3 or 4 top 2 seeds in the tournament (so among the top 8 teams in the country). Vanover, esp by the end of his freshman year, was playing at a level better than any of our centers the following year. I do think Vanover made a bad choice going to Arkansas to play for a coach whose up-and-down style didn't mesh with his abilities, but Fox didn't hold on to him.
I appreciate you are responding to a previous poster's comment about NBA caliber players, but this is another way of not holding Fox accountable for dramatically reducing the talent of the team.
Quote:
After he was hired and players had defected, I was hoping he would hold some scholarships, rather than waste them on projects or grad transfers. But he didn't, and it is what it is. I think we were spoiled by Cuonzo, who had a poor first recruiting class, but everyone knew he had a shot at Brown and Rabb, and he delivered on them. Still, I have argued forever that one-and-dones don't help you, unless you can complement them with some very good teammates, and keep a steady stream of stars coming in the years ahead. Cuonzo was not successful at that, but 3 seasons is too short a time to judge a coach, IMO, whether it be Cuonzo or Fox. Where Fox has disappointed me the most, is in his coaching. We knew he was not a good offensive coach, but his defense has not looked good either, overall. And I haven't been overwhelmed by his public personality. If I was a player needing to decide where to go, I'm not sure he would be able to convince me to play for him, not based on the record, but just how the team looks on the floor. They don't take advantage of their strengths and they don't play together. It seemed like all we did was pass the ball to Bradley and clear space for him, or watch while Betley and Foreman shot way too many shots by themselves. If that is sharing the ball, I don't want to see it anymore. I'll get sucked in and tune in for a few games this season, hoping for improvement.
I agree with most of this, but to combine all of it, the bottom line is that Fox has disappointed with his ability to hold onto the talent on the team when he was hired, disappointed with his recruiting, and disappointed with his coaching. Quite the trifecta!