sonofabear51 said:
Grant on fire!
Great timing. Better late than never.
sonofabear51 said:
Grant on fire!
Please no Hyder.oskidunker said:
Browns foul shooting may be the decider as Hyder cant hold on to the ball
Bear8995 said:
Difference in the game is turnovers. 14-5 not in our favor. Don't love Celestine's last shot but it is better than running the clock down to 0 and throwing something up.
Agree. down 1, you gotta go to the hoop. score or draw the foul.calumnus said:
We got to try to go to Kelly inside
JimSox said:
Outscored 11-3 down the stretch
Team played really well overall versus a superior team - play called for Grant was well designed and resulted inh an open 3 pt shot to potentially win it. though depressing to lose a very close game, the team's play was encouraging. Hyder just not confident from his foot surgery and was far too hesitant. Huge drop off when Brown is off the court.JimSox said:
Grant had the open shot. Almost made it. Which is unfortunate. Too bad.
Played a good game against a good team. Fix the turnovers and the fouls and maybe we win some games.
I agree with your thoughts but Monty used to find ways to get guys open: off-ball screens, going backdoor when a defender overplays, etc. We see none of that now. Having Kelly come up to the top of the key to receive a pass does nothing but take him out of position - it's not like he has any cutters to pass to. When there is motion, it's always at half-speed. Brown does change speeds, but only when he has the ball.Bear8995 said:
Most passes in our offense are to stationary players which are easy to defend and difficult to make. This also makes it difficult for the player catching the ball to then do something with it as they are starting from a dead stop. This means there is very little motion off the ball. When we do catch it with movement, we are catching it while running away from the basket. I hope Fox figues out a way to change that, especially since we aren't a strong 3 point shooting team.
I think this is why Fox uses the dribble hand off offense. To create motion. Unfortunately, other than Brown, and maybe Shepherd, we are unable to turn the corner on defenders as we aren't THAT good at handling the ball.
It all comes down to a lack of skills. We need to improve our shooting, ball handling and passing in general. That rarely happens during the season so we are what we are.
Defensively, we can be a decent team as we do have some length. We are fortunate that Seton Hall isn't a great 3 point shooting team (at least in the 1st half) and aren't super athletic to take us off the bounce.
The tempo currently favors us.
Except when he coached CAL to something like a 30-10 deficit to start an NCAA play in game. I was so excited and 10 min into the game, I wanted to throw up.HearstMining said:I agree with your thoughts but Monty used to find ways to get guys open: off-ball screens, going backdoor when a defender overplays, etc. We see none of that now. Having Kelly come up to the top of the key to receive a pass does nothing but take him out of position - it's not like he has any cutters to pass to. When there is motion, it's always at half-speed. Brown does change speeds, but only when he has the ball.Bear8995 said:
Most passes in our offense are to stationary players which are easy to defend and difficult to make. This also makes it difficult for the player catching the ball to then do something with it as they are starting from a dead stop. This means there is very little motion off the ball. When we do catch it with movement, we are catching it while running away from the basket. I hope Fox figues out a way to change that, especially since we aren't a strong 3 point shooting team.
I think this is why Fox uses the dribble hand off offense. To create motion. Unfortunately, other than Brown, and maybe Shepherd, we are unable to turn the corner on defenders as we aren't THAT good at handling the ball.
It all comes down to a lack of skills. We need to improve our shooting, ball handling and passing in general. That rarely happens during the season so we are what we are.
Defensively, we can be a decent team as we do have some length. We are fortunate that Seton Hall isn't a great 3 point shooting team (at least in the 1st half) and aren't super athletic to take us off the bounce.
The tempo currently favors us.
Nonetheless, Cal played a much better game today than against Florida.
graguna said:Except when he coached CAL to something like a 30-10 deficit to start an NCAA play in game. I was so excited and 10 min into the game, I wanted to throw up.HearstMining said:I agree with your thoughts but Monty used to find ways to get guys open: off-ball screens, going backdoor when a defender overplays, etc. We see none of that now. Having Kelly come up to the top of the key to receive a pass does nothing but take him out of position - it's not like he has any cutters to pass to. When there is motion, it's always at half-speed. Brown does change speeds, but only when he has the ball.Bear8995 said:
Most passes in our offense are to stationary players which are easy to defend and difficult to make. This also makes it difficult for the player catching the ball to then do something with it as they are starting from a dead stop. This means there is very little motion off the ball. When we do catch it with movement, we are catching it while running away from the basket. I hope Fox figues out a way to change that, especially since we aren't a strong 3 point shooting team.
I think this is why Fox uses the dribble hand off offense. To create motion. Unfortunately, other than Brown, and maybe Shepherd, we are unable to turn the corner on defenders as we aren't THAT good at handling the ball.
It all comes down to a lack of skills. We need to improve our shooting, ball handling and passing in general. That rarely happens during the season so we are what we are.
Defensively, we can be a decent team as we do have some length. We are fortunate that Seton Hall isn't a great 3 point shooting team (at least in the 1st half) and aren't super athletic to take us off the bounce.
The tempo currently favors us.
Nonetheless, Cal played a much better game today than against Florida.
Sometimes Monte founds ways to **** the bed too.
Geez Stu, does it always have to be so negative? Instead of implying that Seton Hall looked nothing like a top 25 team, can it possibly be that in this one specific game Cal performed a little bit like they were a top 25 team?stu said:
We made our share of mistakes but we also made Seton Hall look nothing like a Top-25 team.
Yes they played very well. And SH may be a top 25 team. Wonder if stu saw Cane sitting on the bench in street clothes. Adding him to the mix when they get into the Big East battles will make them much better and even make us look good having come so close (albeit without Cane)RedlessWardrobe said:Geez Stu, does it always have to be so negative? Instead of implying that Seton Hall looked nothing like a top 25 team, can it possibly be that in this one specific game Cal performed a little bit like they were a top 25 team?stu said:
We made our share of mistakes but we also made Seton Hall look nothing like a Top-25 team.
Not at all negative. We made Seton Hall look nothing like a top-25 team. Mostly with defense they couldn't handle.RedlessWardrobe said:Geez Stu, does it always have to be so negative? Instead of implying that Seton Hall looked nothing like a top 25 team, can it possibly be that in this one specific game Cal performed a little bit like they were a top 25 team?stu said:
We made our share of mistakes but we also made Seton Hall look nothing like a Top-25 team.
Seton Hall took Ohio State down to the wire, and lost by 3 after leading a lot of the gamestu said:Not at all negative. We made Seton Hall look nothing like a top-25 team. Mostly with defense they couldn't handle.RedlessWardrobe said:Geez Stu, does it always have to be so negative? Instead of implying that Seton Hall looked nothing like a top 25 team, can it possibly be that in this one specific game Cal performed a little bit like they were a top 25 team?stu said:
We made our share of mistakes but we also made Seton Hall look nothing like a Top-25 team.
Nice comeback Stu! I should have figured that out. Happy Thanksgiving!stu said:Not at all negative. We made Seton Hall look nothing like a top-25 team. Mostly with defense they couldn't handle.RedlessWardrobe said:Geez Stu, does it always have to be so negative? Instead of implying that Seton Hall looked nothing like a top 25 team, can it possibly be that in this one specific game Cal performed a little bit like they were a top 25 team?stu said:
We made our share of mistakes but we also made Seton Hall look nothing like a Top-25 team.