concernedparent said:
calumnus said:
BearSD said:
This is what Jaylen had to say about this on Sunday:
https://theathletic.com/3228032/2022/04/03/jaylen-brown-has-unfinished-business-with-celtics-in-postseason-im-excited-and-ready-to-play-against-anybody/
"Last year I missed the playoffs. I had a season-ending injury with my wrist," he said. "This year from a competitive standpoint I'm excited and ready to play against anybody. As a vice president of the Players Association, it's a part of my job description to protect our players' rights and our medical privacy. So you won't hear me comment on my status or anybody else's. But that's how I feel about it."
That sounds like a statement from someone who is not vaxxed (what Rodgers should have said). Hopefully if they play in Toronto and he is not vaxxed he gets vaxxed so he can play. Well, hopefully he gets vaxxed period. I know too many people who have died from this virus.
Not necessarily. With Rodgers, saying you're "immunized" when asked point blank if you're "vaccinated" is an obvious no vaccine. With Brown's statement you can interpret him trying to come as close to saying he's vaccinated without saying he is for diplomatic reasons (still dumb in my mind, but not as dumb as just not getting vaccinated), if you interpret "ready to play against anyone" as meaning he can play in Toronto if he needs to. You could also interpret it in the non-literal, Bill Clinton impeachment hearing way, as in he means he's competitively ready to play against anyone, even if he actually can't due to regulations.
Brown's statement does not literally say that regulations won't stop him from playing in Canada. Reading between the lines, he COULD be trying to say he's vaccinated and Canadian regulations won't stop him. Or, reading between the lines, he COULD be trying to say he's unvaccinated.
But the LITERAL reading of his statement tells us nothing. Brown is a smart guy, and whether he's vaccinated or not, in a literal way, he didn't lie.
As opposed to Rodgers, who literally lied. His "I'm immunized" might have been an obvious "no" to the question of "Have you been vaccinated" if he hadn't first said, "Yeah." "Yeah" literally means yes. If you want to interpret "Yeah" in the non-literal Clinton way, and say, "it depends on what the meaning of 'Yeah' is," then I suppose you could argue he didn't lie. But that doesn't work. If the impeachment trial was about whether Clinton lied, as opposed to whether he should be tossed out of office for a lie about sex (or even whether he committed perjury, because you have to do more than lie under oath to commit perjury), then there is no doubt Clinton should have been convicted of lying, because he LIED, and if Aaron Rodgers were on trial for lying, he should be convicted, too, because he LIED.
Brown, however, was careful enough that whether or not he's vaccinated, he couldn't be convicted of lying.