Fox's Demeanor

11,485 Views | 105 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by 4thGenCal
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheFiatLux said:

eastcoastcal said:

Got back from the Butler game. I decided to carry out a small internal assessment during the game, and chose to solely watch Fox on the bench instead of concentrating on the on-court action.

It was really stunning to see his body language, verbal communication, and behavior towards the players/reactions to the on-court plays. He's really bad at this stuff. Every time something negative happened on the court, he'd throw his hands up, groan, look at his coaches, facepalm or start muttering to himself. Every time. No words of encouragement or motivational stuff- just pure negative energy and blame directed at the players. Scowling, eye-rolling, exasperation, you name it.

I mentioned this in the game thread, but I am absolutely certain there will be an altercation at some point this season. As Lars got subbed out at one point in the 2nd half, he slammed his hand onto his seat in frustration, the guy next to him (forget who) tried to pat him on the back and Lars slapped his hand away. I watched the bench players throughout the 2nd half, there the body language was stark- really, really bad. And to be clear, I'm not someone who over analyzes or reads too much into body language or verbal comms, but even to me this was a really clear picture. I'm telling you, at some point with the losses piling up, there will be a fight. The players are obviously unhappy playing for Fox. Even the way Fox calls for someone to check-in: he snaps at them. He called for Grant to check in and when Grant didn't immediately move, Fox snapped "Grant lets move it, go".

In any case, my main point is we all know Fox has no recruiting chops nor is he some Xs/Os wizard. But honestly he seems like an awful man to play for (and I'm not some pansy who's never played sports in his life or never had to deal with a tough coach; I've played sports my entire life and am fine dealing with hard-nosed coaches) and we're 110% going to see some blow-up this season.
This will go down as the all-time worse hire in the history of Cal. And it won't even be close (and I'm including Dirks as Chancellor in that, and he was an unmitigated disaster.).

It just infuriates me this guy gets a paycheck from us. I don't care about who hired him, or who hired who hired him... I just care that this load, this complete and total load, has anything to do with Cal.

The students - and man do I feel for you - really should go all in towards directing your ire at him. Make it uncomfortable for him. Make him see every game what a total disaster on and off the court he is. Seriously everyone should. I realize it's a long shot, but make things miserable and humiliating enough for him and maybe, just maybe he'll go to Knowlton and quit.
This is what happens at schools with winning traditions. They do not tolerate mediocrity let alone complete incompetence. Could you imagine this happening without a midseason firing at USC, Southern Branch, Michigan, Kentucky, North Carolina, etc?
Fire Knowlton!
Fire Fox!
Put Wilcox in a hot seat!
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheFiatLux said:

BeachedBear said:

TheFiatLux said:


This will go down as the all-time worse hire in the history of Cal. And it won't even be close (and I'm including Dirks as Chancellor in that, and he was an unmitigated disaster.).

YUP! But what really irks me is the lack of addressing the mistake. Everyone fails now and then (or simply picks the wrong person). When that happens, the reasonable thing to do is address the situation and make a change. But in this case:

Year 1. Coming out of the Wyking disaster, we really needed a spark to turn things around. There was hope at the beginning, but by the end of year one, this looked like FOX was not the right person.

Year 2. OK - year 2, lots of hole to dig out of, but he's had a whole year - so we should expect SIGNIFICANT improvement. It didn't happen and this is when a change should have been made. AT A BARE MINIMUM, the AD should have insisted to show him and the fans that he was doing ANYTHING different in order to improve (refruiting, outreach, staff - anything).

Year 3. No changes made. Top player leaves. More of the same and downward trajectory. Well at least there is the three year turnaround excuse. BUT NO! COVID excuse and a mother****ing extension!?!?! Fan base and donors leave in droves and are told "we don't really care enough about MBB".

Year 4. The only thing that could save Fox would be an out of the gate miracle. instead we see a dejected group of players, bad behavior and an 0-7 start against some of the worst teams in MBB. Calls to the AD to act immediately to save the players are ignored.

Worst Hire. Worst Management, Worst Reaction, Worst AD
In all fairness, I've reconsidered and think Bob Bockrath was the worse hire ever. So Fox has that.
Bob Bockrath was the worst AD hire (though Knucklehead Knowlton is a close second).
Mark Fox is the worst basketball HC hire.
Tommy Holmoe was the worst football HC hire.
Fire Knowlton!
Fire Fox!
Put Wilcox in a hot seat!
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

I'm not convinced at all that Knowlton will fire Fox at seasons end. He (or an underling on his behalf) has explained to me that Fox inherited the worst Cal basketball program in history, had unprecedented Covid restriction, roster turnover / departures, etc. The only thing he conceded was that recruiting needed to improve. It would be completely in Knowlton's wheelhouse to excuse this season for injuries and note that recruiting did improve.
I fear that Knowlton would be more inclined to give another extension than fire him.
Fire Knowlton!
Fire Fox!
Put Wilcox in a hot seat!
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civil Bear said:

southseasbear said:

Why would Knucklehead Knowlton do that. He honestly believes that Fox is a genius and that the problem is that the players are not performing well. Remember, he is a military guy who blames the troops not the officers.

That sounds like the exact opposite of my experience with military leadership where officers are highly accountable for the performance of their troops.
Remember Vietnam?
Fire Knowlton!
Fire Fox!
Put Wilcox in a hot seat!
Big Dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
southseasbear said:

tequila4kapp said:

I'm not convinced at all that Knowlton will fire Fox at seasons end. He (or an underling on his behalf) has explained to me that Fox inherited the worst Cal basketball program in history, had unprecedented Covid restriction, roster turnover / departures, etc. The only thing he conceded was that recruiting needed to improve. It would be completely in Knowlton's wheelhouse to excuse this season for injuries and note that recruiting did improve.
I fear that Knowlton would be more inclined to give another extension than fire him.
Agreed. Unless some alums come up with millions for a payoff, no way Knowlton fires Fox after just extending him. (And given JK's incompetence, why would any alum throw more money into the JK dumpster fire?)
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big Dog said:

... Unless some alums come up with millions for a payoff, no way Knowlton fires Fox after just extending him. (And given JK's incompetence, why would any alum throw more money into the JK dumpster fire?)
Are there sufficient donor $ to buy out Knowlton's contract?
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

Big Dog said:

... Unless some alums come up with millions for a payoff, no way Knowlton fires Fox after just extending him. (And given JK's incompetence, why would any alum throw more money into the JK dumpster fire?)
Are there sufficient donor $ to buy out Knowlton's contract?
Maybe the results of the McKeever investigation will provide sufficient cause for termination.
Fire Knowlton!
Fire Fox!
Put Wilcox in a hot seat!
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
southseasbear said:

stu said:

Big Dog said:

... Unless some alums come up with millions for a payoff, no way Knowlton fires Fox after just extending him. (And given JK's incompetence, why would any alum throw more money into the JK dumpster fire?)
Are there sufficient donor $ to buy out Knowlton's contract?
Maybe the results of the McKeever investigation will provide sufficient cause for termination.


There are so many conflicts of interest in that investigation that I doubt they find anything.
Big Dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

Big Dog said:

... Unless some alums come up with millions for a payoff, no way Knowlton fires Fox after just extending him. (And given JK's incompetence, why would any alum throw more money into the JK dumpster fire?)
Are there sufficient donor $ to buy out Knowlton's contract?
I have no inside knowledge, so really don't know if we have alums willing to pony up for the cause (by bailing out imbecilic contract extensions).

but when I was recently dreaming of winning that $1b lottery, I started to ask myself if I would donate a chunk of change to buyout Fox and/or Wilcox, and I could not justify putting good money after bad (under current leadership). I figured I'd rather contribute to increasing the Regents/Chancellor's scholarships.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In defense of Dirks, he had the swagger that one has to have to rock Sid Vicious porcupine spikes, lowride specs and a Frida Kahlo unibrow. At least he will always have that, and you really have to respect it. I know that I do.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

In defense of Dirks, he had the swagger that one has to have to rock Sid Vicious porcupine spikes, lowride specs and a Frida Kahlo unibrow. At least he will always have that, and you really have to respect it. I know that I do.


Have no idea what you are referring to.
Go Bears!
Civil Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
southseasbear said:

Civil Bear said:

southseasbear said:

Why would Knucklehead Knowlton do that. He honestly believes that Fox is a genius and that the problem is that the players are not performing well. Remember, he is a military guy who blames the troops not the officers.

That sounds like the exact opposite of my experience with military leadership where officers are highly accountable for the performance of their troops.
Remember Vietnam?
No, it was before my time.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

bearister said:

In defense of Dirks, he had the swagger that one has to have to rock Sid Vicious porcupine spikes, lowride specs and a Frida Kahlo unibrow. At least he will always have that, and you really have to respect it. I know that I do.


Have no idea what you are referring to.


In a business setting, that look screams out at you:
"I'm eccentric. I have the power. If you don't like it, you can F@uck off!"
It's a total power move. I kinda dig that.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civil Bear said:

southseasbear said:

Civil Bear said:

southseasbear said:

Why would Knucklehead Knowlton do that. He honestly believes that Fox is a genius and that the problem is that the players are not performing well. Remember, he is a military guy who blames the troops not the officers.

That sounds like the exact opposite of my experience with military leadership where officers are highly accountable for the performance of their troops.
Remember Vietnam?
No, it was before my time.


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

In a business setting, that look screams at you:
"I'm eccentric. I have the power. If you don't like it, you can F@uck off!"
It's a total power move. I kinda dig that.
I like that Dirks could look the way he wanted to. His look is distinctive without crossing the line of scaring small children. It's power but it's also Berkeley.

This kind of power does not accrue only to those on top. Anyone who isn't looking for a promotion can exercise it. Someone in a business setting who doesn't want to become another data point supporting the Peter Principle. Someone living in People's Park who is content with it. So when I see someone in a suit I always wonder what does this person want?
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
southseasbear said:

TheFiatLux said:

BeachedBear said:

TheFiatLux said:


This will go down as the all-time worse hire in the history of Cal. And it won't even be close (and I'm including Dirks as Chancellor in that, and he was an unmitigated disaster.).

YUP! But what really irks me is the lack of addressing the mistake. Everyone fails now and then (or simply picks the wrong person). When that happens, the reasonable thing to do is address the situation and make a change. But in this case:

Year 1. Coming out of the Wyking disaster, we really needed a spark to turn things around. There was hope at the beginning, but by the end of year one, this looked like FOX was not the right person.

Year 2. OK - year 2, lots of hole to dig out of, but he's had a whole year - so we should expect SIGNIFICANT improvement. It didn't happen and this is when a change should have been made. AT A BARE MINIMUM, the AD should have insisted to show him and the fans that he was doing ANYTHING different in order to improve (refruiting, outreach, staff - anything).

Year 3. No changes made. Top player leaves. More of the same and downward trajectory. Well at least there is the three year turnaround excuse. BUT NO! COVID excuse and a mother****ing extension!?!?! Fan base and donors leave in droves and are told "we don't really care enough about MBB".

Year 4. The only thing that could save Fox would be an out of the gate miracle. instead we see a dejected group of players, bad behavior and an 0-7 start against some of the worst teams in MBB. Calls to the AD to act immediately to save the players are ignored.

Worst Hire. Worst Management, Worst Reaction, Worst AD
In all fairness, I've reconsidered and think Bob Bockrath was the worse hire ever. So Fox has that.
Bob Bockrath was the worst AD hire (though Knucklehead Knowlton is a close second).
Mark Fox is the worst basketball HC hire.
Tommy Holmoe was the worst football HC hire.


Bob Bockrath was only at Cal for two years. He left Cal for the Texas Tech job, a five year contract at $125,000 a year. Pushed out?

If someone turns out to be a bad hire and they are fired (or you "let" then leave) after two years, thst is par for the course. What kills you is, when someone turns out to be a bad hire and you extend them 8 years. Though I am not sure how the rest of the 90s could have been worse.

Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
southseasbear said:

TheFiatLux said:

BeachedBear said:

TheFiatLux said:


This will go down as the all-time worse hire in the history of Cal. And it won't even be close (and I'm including Dirks as Chancellor in that, and he was an unmitigated disaster.).

YUP! But what really irks me is the lack of addressing the mistake. Everyone fails now and then (or simply picks the wrong person). When that happens, the reasonable thing to do is address the situation and make a change. But in this case:

Year 1. Coming out of the Wyking disaster, we really needed a spark to turn things around. There was hope at the beginning, but by the end of year one, this looked like FOX was not the right person.

Year 2. OK - year 2, lots of hole to dig out of, but he's had a whole year - so we should expect SIGNIFICANT improvement. It didn't happen and this is when a change should have been made. AT A BARE MINIMUM, the AD should have insisted to show him and the fans that he was doing ANYTHING different in order to improve (refruiting, outreach, staff - anything).

Year 3. No changes made. Top player leaves. More of the same and downward trajectory. Well at least there is the three year turnaround excuse. BUT NO! COVID excuse and a mother****ing extension!?!?! Fan base and donors leave in droves and are told "we don't really care enough about MBB".

Year 4. The only thing that could save Fox would be an out of the gate miracle. instead we see a dejected group of players, bad behavior and an 0-7 start against some of the worst teams in MBB. Calls to the AD to act immediately to save the players are ignored.

Worst Hire. Worst Management, Worst Reaction, Worst AD
In all fairness, I've reconsidered and think Bob Bockrath was the worse hire ever. So Fox has that.
Bob Bockrath was the worst AD hire (though Knucklehead Knowlton is a close second).
Mark Fox is the worst basketball HC hire.
Tommy Holmoe was the worst football HC hire.

Don't you at least admire the way Fox has scratched and clawed his way to #1? Only a few months ago, most agreed he was clearly #2, behind his predecessor.
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

southseasbear said:

TheFiatLux said:

BeachedBear said:

TheFiatLux said:


This will go down as the all-time worse hire in the history of Cal. And it won't even be close (and I'm including Dirks as Chancellor in that, and he was an unmitigated disaster.).

YUP! But what really irks me is the lack of addressing the mistake. Everyone fails now and then (or simply picks the wrong person). When that happens, the reasonable thing to do is address the situation and make a change. But in this case:

Year 1. Coming out of the Wyking disaster, we really needed a spark to turn things around. There was hope at the beginning, but by the end of year one, this looked like FOX was not the right person.

Year 2. OK - year 2, lots of hole to dig out of, but he's had a whole year - so we should expect SIGNIFICANT improvement. It didn't happen and this is when a change should have been made. AT A BARE MINIMUM, the AD should have insisted to show him and the fans that he was doing ANYTHING different in order to improve (refruiting, outreach, staff - anything).

Year 3. No changes made. Top player leaves. More of the same and downward trajectory. Well at least there is the three year turnaround excuse. BUT NO! COVID excuse and a mother****ing extension!?!?! Fan base and donors leave in droves and are told "we don't really care enough about MBB".

Year 4. The only thing that could save Fox would be an out of the gate miracle. instead we see a dejected group of players, bad behavior and an 0-7 start against some of the worst teams in MBB. Calls to the AD to act immediately to save the players are ignored.

Worst Hire. Worst Management, Worst Reaction, Worst AD
In all fairness, I've reconsidered and think Bob Bockrath was the worse hire ever. So Fox has that.
Bob Bockrath was the worst AD hire (though Knucklehead Knowlton is a close second).
Mark Fox is the worst basketball HC hire.
Tommy Holmoe was the worst football HC hire.


Bob Bockrath was only at Cal for two years. He left Cal for the Texas Tech job, a five year contract at $125,000 a year. Pushed out?

If someone turns out to be a bad hire and they are fired (or you "let" then leave) after two years, thst is par for the course. What kills you is, when someone turns out to be a bad hire and you extend them 8 years. Though I am not sure how the rest of the 90s could have been worse.


Only two years but he pushed out Snyder (the best coach we have had since Waldorf retired) and hired Gilbertson (who rivals Holmoe as the worst football HC. He fired Campanelli (I think he should have been disciplined not fired) and hired a not yet ready Boseman.
Fire Knowlton!
Fire Fox!
Put Wilcox in a hot seat!
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

bearister said:

In a business setting, that look screams at you:
"I'm eccentric. I have the power. If you don't like it, you can F@uck off!"
It's a total power move. I kinda dig that.
I like that Dirks could look the way he wanted to. His look is distinctive without crossing the line of scaring small children. It's power but it's also Berkeley.

This kind of power does not accrue only to those on top. Anyone who isn't looking for a promotion can exercise it. Someone in a business setting who doesn't want to become another data point supporting the Peter Principle. Someone living in People's Park who is content with it. So when I see someone in a suit I always wonder what does this person want?


…and had I been Dirks' superior, I would have sported this look:



…and I would have insisted that he shave his head, mustache and wear contacts. The unibrow would have to stay.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
southseasbear said:

calumnus said:

southseasbear said:

TheFiatLux said:

BeachedBear said:

TheFiatLux said:


This will go down as the all-time worse hire in the history of Cal. And it won't even be close (and I'm including Dirks as Chancellor in that, and he was an unmitigated disaster.).

YUP! But what really irks me is the lack of addressing the mistake. Everyone fails now and then (or simply picks the wrong person). When that happens, the reasonable thing to do is address the situation and make a change. But in this case:

Year 1. Coming out of the Wyking disaster, we really needed a spark to turn things around. There was hope at the beginning, but by the end of year one, this looked like FOX was not the right person.

Year 2. OK - year 2, lots of hole to dig out of, but he's had a whole year - so we should expect SIGNIFICANT improvement. It didn't happen and this is when a change should have been made. AT A BARE MINIMUM, the AD should have insisted to show him and the fans that he was doing ANYTHING different in order to improve (refruiting, outreach, staff - anything).

Year 3. No changes made. Top player leaves. More of the same and downward trajectory. Well at least there is the three year turnaround excuse. BUT NO! COVID excuse and a mother****ing extension!?!?! Fan base and donors leave in droves and are told "we don't really care enough about MBB".

Year 4. The only thing that could save Fox would be an out of the gate miracle. instead we see a dejected group of players, bad behavior and an 0-7 start against some of the worst teams in MBB. Calls to the AD to act immediately to save the players are ignored.

Worst Hire. Worst Management, Worst Reaction, Worst AD
In all fairness, I've reconsidered and think Bob Bockrath was the worse hire ever. So Fox has that.
Bob Bockrath was the worst AD hire (though Knucklehead Knowlton is a close second).
Mark Fox is the worst basketball HC hire.
Tommy Holmoe was the worst football HC hire.


Bob Bockrath was only at Cal for two years. He left Cal for the Texas Tech job, a five year contract at $125,000 a year. Pushed out?

If someone turns out to be a bad hire and they are fired (or you "let" then leave) after two years, thst is par for the course. What kills you is, when someone turns out to be a bad hire and you extend them 8 years. Though I am not sure how the rest of the 90s could have been worse.


Only two years but he pushed out Snyder (the best coach we have had since Waldorf retired) and hired Gilbertson (who rivals Holmoe as the worst football HC. He fired Campanelli (I think he should have been disciplined not fired) and hired a not yet ready Boseman.


Agree that he did huge damage in a short period of time, but we eventually recovered and could have done so much more quickly.

Knowlton is more like long term strangulation, especially at this most critical moment in the history of college athletics and the Pac-12. If Knowlton is here for the full (12?) years….

The only glimmer of hope is 1) he gets fired for the McKeever scandal or 2) the fact that the Supreme Court has taken control of revenue sports from the NCAA and athletic directors and given it to the boosters.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

…and had I been Dirks' superior, I would have sported this look:


I believe Dirks would have understood he was in for more than an ordinary performance review.
UrsineMaximus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


What the AD should be doing at this point is privately interviewing the players about how they feel their experience is. This was how they justified letting Campanelli go, mid-season. Of course, Knowlton may not want to hear what they have to say.
Cal should take student mental health seriously but they don't. As evidenced with the McKeever situation and now Fox's bullying behavior which has been commented on for years in this forum as well as other sites. Nothing about Fox suggests he is a good human being.
sonofabear51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think this was obvious from the very first meeting between Fox and the players. IIRC, this is when Sueing left.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal should also take alumni mental health into consideration.
JimSox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sonofabear51 said:

I think this was obvious from the very first meeting between Fox and the players. IIRC, this is when Sueing left.


Bingo. The looks on the players' faces listening to his nonsense told the story. That was a huge uh-oh moment right there.
sonofabear51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep. The looks on the players faces spoke volumes. That guy appears to be a southern cracker bully. Cal had talent and a togetherness that is missing now. There is still talent there, but not much in the way of a leader in the coach. IDK, this is kinda what I see. 0-11 and he is still there. Oh, and everything is 'fine'. OK knowlton. You are a huge part of this also. Fire them all. Start clean. And start at the top. Again, ^&*( rolls down hill. I am all about the players, it is the management, the coaches, and the so-called AD. And while we are at it, the Chancellor also. Isn't that where everything gets approved? Please comment.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree about looking out for the players. Athletics should be for them.

I agree we'd be better without Knowlton and Fox. I don't know about Christ, the bulk of her responsibilities lie outside of athletics.

I'd like to see donors and alums MUCH more involved in AD and HC hires.
sonofabear51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agreed. I've been around football since I was a kid, against Texas in '69. And Bball also, Gene Ransome especially. Been to and seen a lot. There is no reason that this is happening here at Cal. Yes athletics should be about them, but they need the help and support from the so-called leaders, i.e., AD, and Chancellor, IMHO. The Chancellor oversees the AD, no? She is responsible also. The last 6 years of Bball are a joke as far as leadership goes.
One last thought, why in the $%^& do you hire a search firm to look for a Bball coach? This seems totally ludicrous to me.
Oh, and then there is the McKeever issue. ***?
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I know that coaches don't jump ship after one year but… anyone notice what Chris Gerlufson is doing across the Bay at USF? 8-2? Cal would sell the Campanile for 8-2 right now. Maybe Knowlton can start lobbying now to get him over here. USF 's program under Golden was like the 6 years we wanted at Cal instead we got the Jones-Fox gut punches. Bring some of the Dons' goodness over here.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad said:

I know that coaches don't jump ship after one year but… anyone notice what Chris Gerlufson is doing across the Bay at USF? 8-2? Cal would sell the Campanile for 8-2 right now. Maybe Knowlton can start lobbying now to get him over here. USF 's program under Golden was like the 6 years we wanted at Cal instead we got the Jones-Fox gut punches. Bring some of the Dons' goodness over here.


Smith went to WSU just as we announced Wyking was fired. Golden started at USF the same year as Fox started at Cal.

We could have had any of Smith, Golden or Gerlufson and for less than we are paying Fox.
TheFiatLux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

bearister said:

In a business setting, that look screams at you:
"I'm eccentric. I have the power. If you don't like it, you can F@uck off!"
It's a total power move. I kinda dig that.
I like that Dirks could look the way he wanted to. His look is distinctive without crossing the line of scaring small children. It's power but it's also Berkeley.

This kind of power does not accrue only to those on top. Anyone who isn't looking for a promotion can exercise it. Someone in a business setting who doesn't want to become another data point supporting the Peter Principle. Someone living in People's Park who is content with it. So when I see someone in a suit I always wonder what does this person want?
But Dirks DID personify the Peter Principle.
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pasternack. Look at what he is doing this year at ucsb. The only sane choice.
Take care of your Chicken
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie said:

Pasternack. Look at what he is doing this year at ucsb. The only sane choice.
Lost by 9 to Northern Arizona and by 11 to Duquense. Does have six wins, but none are very impressive. Fox was an insane choice, but there are many other sane choices. Unless that he brings donor money with him, which would not be my criterion, but may matter.
badger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was on Wisconsin's team in the early 80's. When they players could no longer take Bill Cofield, a group of them showed up at the AD's house (Crazylegs Hirsch) to tell him Cofield had to go. Crazylegs was a football guy and didnt really care about the basketball team. However he listened and fired Cofield shortly thereafter.

Would Knowlton do the same? Would our players feel they would be listened to, or ignored?
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
badger said:

I was on Wisconsin's team in the early 80's. When they players could no longer take Bill Cofield, a group of them showed up at the AD's house (Crazylegs Hirsch) to tell him Cofield had to go. Crazylegs was a football guy and didnt really care about the basketball team. However he listened and fired Cofield shortly thereafter.

Would Knowlton do the same? Would our players feel they would be listened to, or ignored?
That is exactly what led Bob Bockrath (2nd worst AD in Cal history) to fire Campanelli.
Fire Knowlton!
Fire Fox!
Put Wilcox in a hot seat!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.