OFFICIAL BEARINSIDER WARRIORS PLAYOFF THREAD

46,077 Views | 641 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by GMP
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some say Warriors need to go small to draw defenders out of the middle. Others say they should go bigger. What do you think. Looney should take the wide open 15 footer.
Go Bears!
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My Laker fan buddy claims that one of the advantages his team has is that on defense they are basically putting 5 defenders on 4 Warriors and ignoring Draymond. If true, I hope Dray makes his put backs tonight.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Cal_79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Big C said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:


Lakers have a lot more rim protection than the Kings did.

That said, I blame the Warriors' black home unis with the big flower on the front. The Basketball Gods said no to that... again.


Let's face it, the Warriors have been a flawed team all year long. They deserve whatever they've got coming to them.

But, lol, back to the flower… you sicko misogynist!



Sicko? Hey, badge of honor, but misogynist?!? How did you come up with that one?


Uh, massive hyperbole???

I'm sorry.
We previously went thru the whole "the flower is to celebrate women getting the vote" thing, and you were supposed to (in my mind) say, "oh yeah, I now support the flower uniform, too!"
But you don't, and so that makes you, in my inappropriate ribbing humor, a sicko misogynist.

Thank you for enduring my poor attempts at online banter.

(Remember, I have 5 daughters and so instinctively stand up for all things women. Especially, like, if an attractive woman enters the room, I stand up in silent salute!)

And when an 'unattractive' woman enters the room?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

My Laker fan buddy claims that one of the advantages his team has is that on defense they are basically putting 5 defenders on 4 Warriors and ignoring Draymond. If true, I hope Dray makes his put backs tonight.
Most teams try this these days. The Warriors usually find a way around it, but we'll see.
philbert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

My Laker fan buddy claims that one of the advantages his team has is that on defense they are basically putting 5 defenders on 4 Warriors and ignoring Draymond. If true, I hope Dray makes his put backs tonight.
Yeah. It's challenging when Draymond and Looney are on the floor at the same time. They can ignore two non-shooters.

Same story with Kuminga, except he tends to want to shoot the open 3 but usually with mixed results.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Big C said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:


Lakers have a lot more rim protection than the Kings did.

That said, I blame the Warriors' black home unis with the big flower on the front. The Basketball Gods said no to that... again.


Let's face it, the Warriors have been a flawed team all year long. They deserve whatever they've got coming to them.

But, lol, back to the flower… you sicko misogynist!



Sicko? Hey, badge of honor, but misogynist?!? How did you come up with that one?


Uh, massive hyperbole???

I'm sorry.
We previously went thru the whole "the flower is to celebrate women getting the vote" thing, and you were supposed to (in my mind) say, "oh yeah, I now support the flower uniform, too!"
But you don't, and so that makes you, in my inappropriate ribbing humor, a sicko misogynist.

Thank you for enduring my poor attempts at online banter.

(Remember, I have 5 daughters and so instinctively stand up for all things women. Especially, like, if an attractive woman enters the room, I stand up in silent salute!)

My problem with the black unis, the flower and the nod to women's suffrage is...

WTH does it have to do with GSW basketball?!? But I only have one daughter, so what would I know...
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:


Lakers have a lot more rim protection than the Kings did.

That said, I blame the Warriors' black home unis with the big flower on the front. The Basketball Gods said no to that... again.


Let's face it, the Warriors have been a flawed team all year long. They deserve whatever they've got coming to them.

But, lol, back to the flower… you sicko misogynist!



Sicko? Hey, badge of honor, but misogynist?!? How did you come up with that one?


Uh, massive hyperbole???

I'm sorry.
We previously went thru the whole "the flower is to celebrate women getting the vote" thing, and you were supposed to (in my mind) say, "oh yeah, I now support the flower uniform, too!"
But you don't, and so that makes you, in my inappropriate ribbing humor, a sicko misogynist.

Thank you for enduring my poor attempts at online banter.

(Remember, I have 5 daughters and so instinctively stand up for all things women. Especially, like, if an attractive woman enters the room, I stand up in silent salute!)

My problem with the black unis, the flower and the nod to women's suffrage is...

WTH does it have to do with GSW basketball?!? But I only have one daughter, so what would I know...

I am just generally opposed to teams having a bunch of mix-and-match color combinations. Makes it too hard to tell which team is which. Warriors should stick with blue and yellow as the main colors, not black.
philbert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow! I didn't realize AD played 44 minutes and Lebron 40! I don't know if that's sustainable.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Big C said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:


Lakers have a lot more rim protection than the Kings did.

That said, I blame the Warriors' black home unis with the big flower on the front. The Basketball Gods said no to that... again.


Let's face it, the Warriors have been a flawed team all year long. They deserve whatever they've got coming to them.

But, lol, back to the flower… you sicko misogynist!



Sicko? Hey, badge of honor, but misogynist?!? How did you come up with that one?


Uh, massive hyperbole???

I'm sorry.
We previously went thru the whole "the flower is to celebrate women getting the vote" thing, and you were supposed to (in my mind) say, "oh yeah, I now support the flower uniform, too!"
But you don't, and so that makes you, in my inappropriate ribbing humor, a sicko misogynist.

Thank you for enduring my poor attempts at online banter.

(Remember, I have 5 daughters and so instinctively stand up for all things women. Especially, like, if an attractive woman enters the room, I stand up in silent salute!)

My problem with the black unis, the flower and the nod to women's suffrage is...

WTH does it have to do with GSW basketball?!? But I only have one daughter, so what would I know...

I am just generally opposed to teams having a bunch of mix-and-match color combinations. Makes it too hard to tell which team is which. Warriors should stick with blue and yellow as the main colors, not black.

I'm getting concerned about you guys and your uni color fetish. Is this an offshoot of the drapes/carpet thing?



Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

Some say Warriors need to go small to draw defenders out of the middle. Others say they should go bigger. What do you think. Looney should take the wide open 15 footer.
Looney bricks that shot like Green does
SRBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They're both bad at layups...but Looney almost never takes that shot....hard to know if he's good or bad at it.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SRBear said:

They're both bad at layups...but Looney almost never takes that shot....hard to know if he's good or bad at it.
He does ocassionally, looks like he is wearing a backpack on his back while he shoots
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

sycasey said:

Big C said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:


Lakers have a lot more rim protection than the Kings did.

That said, I blame the Warriors' black home unis with the big flower on the front. The Basketball Gods said no to that... again.


Let's face it, the Warriors have been a flawed team all year long. They deserve whatever they've got coming to them.

But, lol, back to the flower… you sicko misogynist!



Sicko? Hey, badge of honor, but misogynist?!? How did you come up with that one?


Uh, massive hyperbole???

I'm sorry.
We previously went thru the whole "the flower is to celebrate women getting the vote" thing, and you were supposed to (in my mind) say, "oh yeah, I now support the flower uniform, too!"
But you don't, and so that makes you, in my inappropriate ribbing humor, a sicko misogynist.

Thank you for enduring my poor attempts at online banter.

(Remember, I have 5 daughters and so instinctively stand up for all things women. Especially, like, if an attractive woman enters the room, I stand up in silent salute!)

My problem with the black unis, the flower and the nod to women's suffrage is...

WTH does it have to do with GSW basketball?!? But I only have one daughter, so what would I know...

I am just generally opposed to teams having a bunch of mix-and-match color combinations. Makes it too hard to tell which team is which. Warriors should stick with blue and yellow as the main colors, not black.

I'm getting concerned about you guys and your uni color fetish. Is this an offshoot of the drapes/carpet thing?





Rest assured, I am master of my domain.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
philbert said:

Wow! I didn't realize AD played 44 minutes and Lebron 40! I don't know if that's sustainable.

Wouldn't be surprised if they punt a bit on Game 2 after having already grabbed a road win.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?


The backpack shot
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

sycasey said:

Big C said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:


Lakers have a lot more rim protection than the Kings did.

That said, I blame the Warriors' black home unis with the big flower on the front. The Basketball Gods said no to that... again.


Let's face it, the Warriors have been a flawed team all year long. They deserve whatever they've got coming to them.

But, lol, back to the flower… you sicko misogynist!



Sicko? Hey, badge of honor, but misogynist?!? How did you come up with that one?


Uh, massive hyperbole???

I'm sorry.
We previously went thru the whole "the flower is to celebrate women getting the vote" thing, and you were supposed to (in my mind) say, "oh yeah, I now support the flower uniform, too!"
But you don't, and so that makes you, in my inappropriate ribbing humor, a sicko misogynist.

Thank you for enduring my poor attempts at online banter.

(Remember, I have 5 daughters and so instinctively stand up for all things women. Especially, like, if an attractive woman enters the room, I stand up in silent salute!)

My problem with the black unis, the flower and the nod to women's suffrage is...

WTH does it have to do with GSW basketball?!? But I only have one daughter, so what would I know...

I am just generally opposed to teams having a bunch of mix-and-match color combinations. Makes it too hard to tell which team is which. Warriors should stick with blue and yellow as the main colors, not black.

I'm getting concerned about you guys and your uni color fetish. Is this an offshoot of the drapes/carpet thing?





bearister, if you're stylin' yourself as "Mr. I'm-above-all-this-talk-about-colors-bs", let me ask you one question:

Are you wearing a red shirt right now? If not, then you're one of us! If so, then go down to Furd and **** yourself.

Colors matter.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Are you wearing a red shirt right now?"
Tell me this isn't a clumsy attempt at phone sex, please.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
prospeCt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.sfchronicle.com/vault/article/oakland-athletics-fans-17908840.php





bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That long discussion about AD's injury history is setting him up for a SI cover like jinx. That bad juju.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Klay:



*Schroeder is not only a flopper, he is a dirty player.

* In Game 1 and Game 2: Warriors 42 treys vs Lakers 16
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Steph played POINT GUARD tonight.
12 assists.

And JaMychal Green had more points than AD. 15!

Dubs had 48 points in the PAINT.

BLOWOUT!!!
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kerr with some brilliant adjustments tonight.

First, he's strictly playing one big with 4 shooters (no gp2, no kuminga). We will get back to why this is absolutely key later.

Second, they are involving AD in every single action. If you let AD just camp in the paint, he's the best defender in the league. If you get him out on the perimeter, he's the lakers worst defender.

Here are the different actions they are running right at AD.

- Kerr is absolutely spamming the curry/draymond high PnR. If AD plays drop, curry will have a wide open look. If AD switches, curry will simply drive past him and there's no AD to protect the rim. If AD traps, green has a 4 on 3 with the middle conpletely wide open because there are shooters all around the perimeter (no looney mucking up the middle). On the 4 on 3, green can read the defense and either kick out to a wide open Jgreen or have a wide open layup and or easy pass to the dunker position.

When they aren't running pick and roll, they are having draymond start with the ball at the top. When AD drops, they run easy handoffs to curry for wide open looks.

When they aren't doing any of the above, whoever AD is guarding is setting an offball screen, forcing AD to try to switch off to a shooter (usually Klay)

I have watched a lot of warriors basketball. I have never seen Kerr attack a big as relentlessly as I saw tonight. Almost every single action was run right at AD and he couldn't guard it…at all. I've never seen so many wide open looks in a playoff game.

Further, making AD run around and play defense on the perimeter also tires him out which makes him less effective on the offensive end.

I don't see the adjustment the Lakers can make. They could possibly just switch the PnR and let AD guard Steph 1 on 1 and take your chances. AD could hedge, but he hasnt been fast enough to recover when curry outlets to green. Or you can have AD trap harder and make things more difficult when green is playing 4 on 3. But all of these strategies are just praying the warriors are going to just miss open looks (which is possible)

But Kerr has made clear, they aren't going to allow AD to camp in the paint. They just aren't. If that means spamming the curry PnR (something they never do) or if it means playing Jgreen, it is what it is. They simply aren't going to allow AD play defense in the paint.

You're going to hear the talking heads say the lakers just didn't play hard and that's why they lost by 30. Sure, there's some of that. But the biggest reason for the blowout is spamming the curry PnR and making AD guard in space.

If the lakers don't find a solution, I don't see how the lakers win this series.
philbert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

Kerr with some brilliant adjustments tonight.

First, he's strictly playing one big with 4 shooters (no gp2, no kuminga). We will get back to why this is absolutely key later.

Second, they are involving AD in every single action. If you let AD just camp in the paint, he's the best defender in the league. If you get him out on the perimeter, he's the lakers worst defender.

Here are the different actions they are running right at AD.

- Kerr is absolutely spamming the curry/draymond high PnR. If AD plays drop, curry will have a wide open look. If AD switches, curry will simply drive past him and there's no AD to protect the rim. If AD traps, green has a 4 on 3 with the middle conpletely wide open because there are shooters all around the perimeter (no looney mucking up the middle). On the 4 on 3, green can read the defense and either kick out to a wide open Jgreen or have a wide open layup and or easy pass to the dunker position.

When they aren't running pick and roll, they are having draymond start with the ball at the top. When AD drops, they run easy handoffs to curry for wide open looks.

When they aren't doing any of the above, whoever AD is guarding is setting an offball screen, forcing AD to try to switch off to a shooter (usually Klay)

I have watched a lot of warriors basketball. I have never seen Kerr attack a big as relentlessly as I saw tonight. Almost every single action was run right at AD and he couldn't guard it…at all. I've never seen so many wide open looks in a playoff game.

Further, making AD run around and play defense on the perimeter also tires him out which makes him less effective on the offensive end.

I don't see the adjustment the Lakers can make. They could possibly just switch the PnR and let AD guard Steph 1 on 1 and take your chances. AD could hedge, but he hasnt been fast enough to recover when curry outlets to green. Or you can have AD trap harder and make things more difficult when green is playing 4 on 3. But all of these strategies are just praying the warriors are going to just miss open looks (which is possible)

But Kerr has made clear, they aren't going to allow AD to camp in the paint. They just aren't. If that means spamming the curry PnR (something they never do) or if it means playing Jgreen, it is what it is. They simply aren't going to allow AD play defense in the paint.

You're going to hear the talking heads say the lakers just didn't play hard and that's why they lost by 30. Sure, there's some of that. But the biggest reason for the blowout is spamming the curry PnR and making AD guard in space.

If the lakers don't find a solution, I don't see how the lakers win this series.
Great analysis. I assumed one of their adjustments would be to bring AD into the PnR actions.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I missed the game.
I fully expected Kerr adjustments to deal with AD and get Curry more shots. He's too good not to.
The Lakers staff has been very good all year; they'll do something back.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think LeBron did check out in the second half when he saw it wasn't going their way. But yeah, it will be interesting to see how they can counter. LeBron usually comes up with something on his own, but the issue is (as always) keeping him and AD fresh and healthy. That will be a challenge with the way the Warriors make you run around on defense.
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One adjustment could be to move AD off of draymond. It's just too easy to run PnR at AD. I think switching lebron onto green could help. Lebron could defend the PnR better and you could keep AD in the paint.
philbert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I missed this Legler segment. In an earlier one, he mentioned that the Lakers guarding Memphis in the last series was very simple due to the limited actions they ran. He said defending GS was so much harder due to "complete chaos" they will throw at LA.


bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you do any coaching? I'm thinking you don't lose 16 in a row if you coached the Bears last season. Well done.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

Kerr with some brilliant adjustments tonight.

First, he's strictly playing one big with 4 shooters (no gp2, no kuminga). We will get back to why this is absolutely key later.

Second, they are involving AD in every single action. If you let AD just camp in the paint, he's the best defender in the league. If you get him out on the perimeter, he's the lakers worst defender.

Here are the different actions they are running right at AD.

- Kerr is absolutely spamming the curry/draymond high PnR. If AD plays drop, curry will have a wide open look. If AD switches, curry will simply drive past him and there's no AD to protect the rim. If AD traps, green has a 4 on 3 with the middle conpletely wide open because there are shooters all around the perimeter (no looney mucking up the middle). On the 4 on 3, green can read the defense and either kick out to a wide open Jgreen or have a wide open layup and or easy pass to the dunker position.

When they aren't running pick and roll, they are having draymond start with the ball at the top. When AD drops, they run easy handoffs to curry for wide open looks.

When they aren't doing any of the above, whoever AD is guarding is setting an offball screen, forcing AD to try to switch off to a shooter (usually Klay)

I have watched a lot of warriors basketball. I have never seen Kerr attack a big as relentlessly as I saw tonight. Almost every single action was run right at AD and he couldn't guard it…at all. I've never seen so many wide open looks in a playoff game.

Further, making AD run around and play defense on the perimeter also tires him out which makes him less effective on the offensive end.

I don't see the adjustment the Lakers can make. They could possibly just switch the PnR and let AD guard Steph 1 on 1 and take your chances. AD could hedge, but he hasnt been fast enough to recover when curry outlets to green. Or you can have AD trap harder and make things more difficult when green is playing 4 on 3. But all of these strategies are just praying the warriors are going to just miss open looks (which is possible)

But Kerr has made clear, they aren't going to allow AD to camp in the paint. They just aren't. If that means spamming the curry PnR (something they never do) or if it means playing Jgreen, it is what it is. They simply aren't going to allow AD play defense in the paint.

You're going to hear the talking heads say the lakers just didn't play hard and that's why they lost by 30. Sure, there's some of that. But the biggest reason for the blowout is spamming the curry PnR and making AD guard in space.

If the lakers don't find a solution, I don't see how the lakers win this series.
This is why Madsen is signing a lot of good shooters. If you have a great bench, you can make changes depending on who you are playing.if people get injured, you have good reserves.
Go Bears!
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Lakers a 6 point bow wow tomorrow.


"No way I'm giving 6, Laker fans. Back off! Step back!"


Warriors cover by 21.


My stock picks are available via PM.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've been mr wrong in my picks and these W's.
I'm going index funds!
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Also, AD has a pretty uncomfortable for Laker fan history of playing well in odd number games and very poorly in even number games. He's had some serious mental lapses this year - like fouling a 3 point shooter at the buzzer when up by 3 or 4 - and giving up 4 point plays. Twice. It's really maddening for Lakers fans that one of our two superstars basically isn't always there. That plus the injuries is why there are occasional pushes to trade him. When he's good he's great but when he's not he's very pedestrian.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal_79 said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:


Lakers have a lot more rim protection than the Kings did.

That said, I blame the Warriors' black home unis with the big flower on the front. The Basketball Gods said no to that... again.


Let's face it, the Warriors have been a flawed team all year long. They deserve whatever they've got coming to them.

But, lol, back to the flower… you sicko misogynist!



Sicko? Hey, badge of honor, but misogynist?!? How did you come up with that one?


Uh, massive hyperbole???

I'm sorry.
We previously went thru the whole "the flower is to celebrate women getting the vote" thing, and you were supposed to (in my mind) say, "oh yeah, I now support the flower uniform, too!"
But you don't, and so that makes you, in my inappropriate ribbing humor, a sicko misogynist.

Thank you for enduring my poor attempts at online banter.

(Remember, I have 5 daughters and so instinctively stand up for all things women. Especially, like, if an attractive woman enters the room, I stand up in silent salute!)

And when an 'unattractive' woman enters the room?


Apologies, not all attempts at humor work.
You know, I've been working out material here for the past 15 years for my upcoming hit comedy club career.
But I appreciate the free practice medium.
I retract my inappropriate mix of social equality and basic hormonal manliness. I am stuck between two eras on commonality.
What was I thinking?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are you suggesting Looney having a case of "the vapors" and playing limited time was a strategy move to plant a sticky sock bomb on the Laker's game plan treads?

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:

concordtom said:

Big C said:


Lakers have a lot more rim protection than the Kings did.

That said, I blame the Warriors' black home unis with the big flower on the front. The Basketball Gods said no to that... again.


Let's face it, the Warriors have been a flawed team all year long. They deserve whatever they've got coming to them.

But, lol, back to the flower… you sicko misogynist!



Sicko? Hey, badge of honor, but misogynist?!? How did you come up with that one?


Uh, massive hyperbole???

I'm sorry.
We previously went thru the whole "the flower is to celebrate women getting the vote" thing, and you were supposed to (in my mind) say, "oh yeah, I now support the flower uniform, too!"
But you don't, and so that makes you, in my inappropriate ribbing humor, a sicko misogynist.

Thank you for enduring my poor attempts at online banter.

(Remember, I have 5 daughters and so instinctively stand up for all things women. Especially, like, if an attractive woman enters the room, I stand up in silent salute!)

My problem with the black unis, the flower and the nod to women's suffrage is...

WTH does it have to do with GSW basketball?!? But I only have one daughter, so what would I know...


1. Community based orgs/businesses try to lead socially ALL THE TIME! That's what's going on with the flower, and I support that!

2. It's fine if you don't like the black unis or the color scheme.

3. I've just been trying to tease you re the suffrage message, because you're such a nice guy. I trust you've taken no actual offense.

4. Come on, man. Get with the flower!
What's it got to do with the GSW's?
Hmmm. I could come up with plenty. Probably 40% of all butts in seats are female butts. And by Warriors, what kind of warriors do you think the team means? Lance throwing warriors? Gun toting warriors? How about social justice warriors, or womens rights warriors? Sure, basketball warriors who fight to the end. But it's a versatile mascot, could mean all things to all people, so on some nights we are going with women. Yay team!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.