UOP Tigres @The Haas Game Thread

8,778 Views | 97 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by bearister
billyosier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At least we have football
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, maybe we still aren't good.
calgldnbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Respectfully…. Did you think we were good???
oskiswifeshusband
How long do you want to ignore this user?
yeah,.. about that
Grrrrah76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacific 50% threes
Cal 23% threes

TedfordTheGreat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As posters have pointed out even during the transfer period, we dont have the talent on defense at the moment.
oskiswifeshusband
How long do you want to ignore this user?
we wanted maddog we got chihuaha today..
calbearinamaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Pacific Bench 34

CAL Bench 0
If you believe in forever
Then life is just a one-night stand
If there's a rock and roll heaven
Well you know they've got a hell of a band
GoCal80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, the Pac12 won 8 out of 9 games tonight. First time since Dec. 1954 we've lost to Pacific. Yay!
bluehenbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Madsen honeymoon is over
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TedfordTheGreat said:

As posters have pointed out even during the transfer period, we dont have the talent on defense at the moment.


If we don't have talent on defense, one guy coming back in a few weeks isn't going to turn this team around.

This looked like a Mark Fox special.
75bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bluehenbear said:

Madsen honeymoon is over
Hopefully Cal State Bakersfield is just what the doctor ordered.
touchdownbears43
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gonna need to graduate and move on from all the Mark Fox players
oskiswifeshusband
How long do you want to ignore this user?
exactly this. Madsen should have cleaned house
CaliforniaEternal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mark Fox is laughing somewhere tonight.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaEternal said:

Mark Fox is laughing somewhere tonight.


The Mark Fox who started out last year with 12 losses including to UC Davis, UC San Diego and Southern? On his way to 3-29 the worst record in the country and our history with the lowest scoring team in the country?

The only reason he should laugh after we lose to a WCC team early is because we paid him over $10 million to crater our program.
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tyson going down shook the team up. They were leaning way too much on him to begin with, and I think realized he was the only reason they were in this. Madsen needs to get these guys mentally fit. Instead of rallying to pick up the slack, they withered like a pair of fake boobs on an elderly Stanfurd alum.
oskiswifeshusband
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The whole play free thing is not working. Some players look lost. Askew has 0 vision.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think the play free thing needs better players, i.e. 5 like Tyson. He can do everything and makes everyone else on the court better. All the others (I haven't seen Kennedy) look complimentary and might need more structure to be effective.

I still think our defense is a disaster. We switch on every screen until a guard or center is on a guy he can't handle. I'd like to see something else, at least on occasion. We can't give up 87 to a team like UOP and win many games.

I don't know if Tyson was injured earlier but he came up limping after his showboat aftermath to a dunk. Looks like a knee, I sure hope it's something which will heal in a reasonable time. It also looked like Newell was hobbled, he couldn't do much late in the game. This is not a team which will win a lot of games with three starters out and Celestine didn't look too healthy either.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Grrrrah76 said:

Pacific 50% threes
Cal 23% threes


Our 3-point defense is obviously a weakness that Madsen and the guys are going to have to do some serious work on.
JimSox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wonder why Askew seemed to play without any plan of what to do. He was a real offensive threat last year before he got hurt.
And what's with the defense that allowed so many open threes and drives to the bucket? Seemed disorganized on offense and defense to me.
harebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oscarsBBurger said:

Knowlton just sat down in my row, have some choice words but holding back…
Knowlton was close to me for a few minutes and I got so stressed out that I moved.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Back from the game. Okay, we sucked tonight, but relax, guys, this is going to be a process. We need to defend better, especially the perimeter and the PG position is problematic (3 assists, I believe, combined, for Askew, Cone, Pavlovic and Brown).

IMO, it's okay to critique individual players, but hey, don't do it in a derogatory way. We can be better than that.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The stats show Askew with 3 assists, Cone with 2, Brown with 0, and Pavlovic with 0.

Good comment about respecting our players!

Why didn't Bowser play? I think his experience and length could have done more for our defense than our freshmen did.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

The stats show Askew with 3 assists, Cone with 2, Brown with 0, and Pavlovic with 0.

Good comment about respecting our players!

Why didn't Bowser play? I think his experience and length could have done more for our defense than our freshmen did.

Fair enough. When I looked at the scoreboard stats with a couple of minutes left, Cone showed zero assists. My general point about that position stands.

I know on the game thread, the filter tends to come off, but some people, before they post something about a player, should imagine if they would say that to the player's face.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A healthy Tyson could play PG. His ball handling, vision, passing, and speed are up to it. IMHO he's our only player who makes the others better.
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

A healthy Tyson could play PG. His ball handling, vision, passing, and speed are up to it. IMHO he's our only player who makes the others better.


I thought Pavlovic was another one but he had a rough showing in limited minutes. It's going to be a difficult season. We have a clear talent increase over last year but this is going to take some coaching magic. Hopefully Madsen has it in him.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
75bear said:

bluehenbear said:

Madsen honeymoon is over
Hopefully Cal State Bakersfield is just what the doctor ordered.


Last time we played them they ate Cuonzo's breakfast, lunch and dinner in Round 1 of the NIT at Haas. Me, 47 other fans and the Fiji Water girl enjoyed the game immensely.




Cal State Bakersfield 73-66 California (Mar 14, 2017) Final Score - ESPN


https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/game/_/gameId/400946458

https://bearinsider.com/forums/3/topics/87009/replies/1586853
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.