Would you accept a bid in The CBI post season tournament

2,866 Views | 27 Replies | Last: 9 mo ago by RedlessWardrobe
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would, given where we were.

Oregon , oregon State and Wsu have been in it, in the past. I understand you lose money, however. Not sure if Knowlton would do it.
Go Bears!
OldenBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For me, it's what the players want. If they want to play a bit longer I'm fine with it. And Knowlton should be too
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Players want to play; I'm pretty sure they would want it. And it would add to the image of the program turnaround. Seems like a no-brainer.
Chabbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In football you want a minor bowl game for the practice time for your returning players. In basketball?
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chabbear said:

In football you want a minor bowl game for the practice time for your returning players. In basketball?


For something to do
Go Bears!
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Given where we have been the last 6 years, we should damn near put up a CBI invite banner up in Haas and be very proud of it. Like call this team back in 10 years and celebrate the anniversary of an invite to the CBI.

This team finally has me looking forward to a next game.
Give to Cal Legends!

https://calegends.com/donation/ Do it now. Text every Cal fan you know, give them the link, tell them how much you gave, and ask them to text every Cal fan they know and do the same.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think we have to get to .500

If we do we will be a MUCH improved team, it will be great to have this team keep playing as there is no next year and we could easily win the thing,
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chabbear said:

In football you want a minor bowl game for the practice time for your returning players. In basketball?
Why not keep playing? Another obvious difference in the two is the injury factor.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We don't need a 500 record if we have the top 2 NET ranking after NCAA teams

It's possible we can get there if some Pac12 teams above us are invited to ncaa

"NIT Changes:

For the 2024 NIT, conference regular season champions that do not win their conference tournament or are not otherwise selected to the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship will not receive an automatic bid to the NIT. Instead, the NIT will guarantee two teams (based on the NET rankings) from each of six conferences (Atlantic Coast, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeastern). The top two teams in the NET rankings not qualifying for the NCAA men's basketball tournament from each conference, regardless of won-loss record, will be selected. Additionally, the 12 teams automatically selected will be guaranteed the opportunity to host a game in the first round of the NIT. "


calumnus said:

I think we have to get to .500

If we do we will be a MUCH improved team, it will be great to have this team keep playing as there is no next year and we could easily win the thing,
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hell yea. I want another NIT championship!
Vandalus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

We don't need a 500 record if we have the top 2 NET ranking after NCAA teams


What's crazy (to me at least) is that our NET went down from 119 to 120 after beating washington, a NET 72 team and losing to a NET 31 team (WSU), both quad 1 tier road games. ***?
~Spectemur agendo~
BearSD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

We don't need a 500 record if we have the top 2 NET ranking after NCAA teams

It's possible we can get there if some Pac12 teams above us are invited to ncaa

"NIT Changes:

For the 2024 NIT, conference regular season champions that do not win their conference tournament or are not otherwise selected to the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship will not receive an automatic bid to the NIT. Instead, the NIT will guarantee two teams (based on the NET rankings) from each of six conferences (Atlantic Coast, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeastern). The top two teams in the NET rankings not qualifying for the NCAA men's basketball tournament from each conference, regardless of won-loss record, will be selected. Additionally, the 12 teams automatically selected will be guaranteed the opportunity to host a game in the first round of the NIT. "
There's no chance of that many Pac-12 teams being invited to the NCAAs.

It's possible that only Arizona and Wazzu get in. Either CU or UU might make it if they win nearly all of their remaining games. Any other team would have to win the Pac-12 tournament to get in. Even *if* by some weird set of circumstances both CU and UU were invited -and- a team outside the top four won the Pac-12 tournament, that's just five. Even under that very unlikely scenario, only the #6 and #7 Pac teams would be selected for the NIT. More likely, those two NIT picks will go to Oregon and either CU or UU, or to both CU and UU if neither is selected for the NCAA field.

Here are the NET rankings of Pac-12 teams, as of Monday afternoon:

3 Arizona
31 Washington St.
42 Colorado
50 Utah
61 Oregon
72 Washington
103 Stanford
105 UCLA
108 USC
120 California
135 Arizona St.
173 Oregon St.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cbi has different rules
Go Bears!
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearSD said:

HoopDreams said:

We don't need a 500 record if we have the top 2 NET ranking after NCAA teams

It's possible we can get there if some Pac12 teams above us are invited to ncaa

"NIT Changes:

For the 2024 NIT, conference regular season champions that do not win their conference tournament or are not otherwise selected to the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship will not receive an automatic bid to the NIT. Instead, the NIT will guarantee two teams (based on the NET rankings) from each of six conferences (Atlantic Coast, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeastern). The top two teams in the NET rankings not qualifying for the NCAA men's basketball tournament from each conference, regardless of won-loss record, will be selected. Additionally, the 12 teams automatically selected will be guaranteed the opportunity to host a game in the first round of the NIT. "
There's no chance of that many Pac-12 teams being invited to the NCAAs.

It's possible that only Arizona and Wazzu get in. Either CU or UU might make it if they win nearly all of their remaining games. Any other team would have to win the Pac-12 tournament to get in. Even *if* by some weird set of circumstances both CU and UU were invited -and- a team outside the top four won the Pac-12 tournament, that's just five. Even under that very unlikely scenario, only the #6 and #7 Pac teams would be selected for the NIT. More likely, those two NIT picks will go to Oregon and either CU or UU, or to both CU and UU if neither is selected for the NCAA field.

Here are the NET rankings of Pac-12 teams, as of Monday afternoon:

3 Arizona
31 Washington St.
42 Colorado
50 Utah
61 Oregon
72 Washington
103 Stanford
105 UCLA
108 USC
120 California
135 Arizona St.
173 Oregon St.
thanks for posting the current net rankings. I think you're right. Our OOC home losses basically killed our net.

Still, we play 4 of those teams ahead of us so there is a chance. Unfortunately, we win on the road against a Quad 1 team and lose on the road to a Quad 1 team, and our Net still dropped?!!??

At least with the changed NIT rules we don't have to worry about getting to 500.

oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

BearSD said:

HoopDreams said:

We don't need a 500 record if we have the top 2 NET ranking after NCAA teams

It's possible we can get there if some Pac12 teams above us are invited to ncaa

"NIT Changes:

For the 2024 NIT, conference regular season champions that do not win their conference tournament or are not otherwise selected to the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship will not receive an automatic bid to the NIT. Instead, the NIT will guarantee two teams (based on the NET rankings) from each of six conferences (Atlantic Coast, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeastern). The top two teams in the NET rankings not qualifying for the NCAA men's basketball tournament from each conference, regardless of won-loss record, will be selected. Additionally, the 12 teams automatically selected will be guaranteed the opportunity to host a game in the first round of the NIT. "
There's no chance of that many Pac-12 teams being invited to the NCAAs.

It's possible that only Arizona and Wazzu get in. Either CU or UU might make it if they win nearly all of their remaining games. Any other team would have to win the Pac-12 tournament to get in. Even *if* by some weird set of circumstances both CU and UU were invited -and- a team outside the top four won the Pac-12 tournament, that's just five. Even under that very unlikely scenario, only the #6 and #7 Pac teams would be selected for the NIT. More likely, those two NIT picks will go to Oregon and either CU or UU, or to both CU and UU if neither is selected for the NCAA field.

Here are the NET rankings of Pac-12 teams, as of Monday afternoon:

3 Arizona
31 Washington St.
42 Colorado
50 Utah
61 Oregon
72 Washington
103 Stanford
105 UCLA
108 USC
120 California
135 Arizona St.
173 Oregon St.
thanks for posting the current net rankings. I think you're right. Our OOC home losses basically killed our net.

Still, we play 4 of those teams ahead of us so there is a chance. Unfortunately, we win on the road against a Quad 1 team and lose on the road to a Quad 1 team, and our Net still dropped?!!??

At least with the changed NIT rules we don't have to worry about getting to 500.




Southern Indiana was selected for the CBI last year with a 16-16 record. No one with a losing record was selected.not hopefull
Go Bears!
BearSD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

BearSD said:




thanks for posting the current net rankings. I think you're right. Our OOC home losses basically killed our net.

Still, we play 4 of those teams ahead of us so there is a chance. Unfortunately, we win on the road against a Quad 1 team and lose on the road to a Quad 1 team, and our Net still dropped?!!??

At least with the changed NIT rules we don't have to worry about getting to 500.
That quad 1 win (vs. #72) only raised Cal's quad 1 record to 1-6. And you are correct about the bad losses (1-3 vs. quad 4 teams) dragging down the NET ranking. USC at #108 has about the same overall record, and they are 0-6 vs. quad 1, but 4-0 vs. quad 4.
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

BearSD said:

HoopDreams said:

We don't need a 500 record if we have the top 2 NET ranking after NCAA teams

It's possible we can get there if some Pac12 teams above us are invited to ncaa

"NIT Changes:

For the 2024 NIT, conference regular season champions that do not win their conference tournament or are not otherwise selected to the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship will not receive an automatic bid to the NIT. Instead, the NIT will guarantee two teams (based on the NET rankings) from each of six conferences (Atlantic Coast, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeastern). The top two teams in the NET rankings not qualifying for the NCAA men's basketball tournament from each conference, regardless of won-loss record, will be selected. Additionally, the 12 teams automatically selected will be guaranteed the opportunity to host a game in the first round of the NIT. "
There's no chance of that many Pac-12 teams being invited to the NCAAs.

It's possible that only Arizona and Wazzu get in. Either CU or UU might make it if they win nearly all of their remaining games. Any other team would have to win the Pac-12 tournament to get in. Even *if* by some weird set of circumstances both CU and UU were invited -and- a team outside the top four won the Pac-12 tournament, that's just five. Even under that very unlikely scenario, only the #6 and #7 Pac teams would be selected for the NIT. More likely, those two NIT picks will go to Oregon and either CU or UU, or to both CU and UU if neither is selected for the NCAA field.

Here are the NET rankings of Pac-12 teams, as of Monday afternoon:

3 Arizona
31 Washington St.
42 Colorado
50 Utah
61 Oregon
72 Washington
103 Stanford
105 UCLA
108 USC
120 California
135 Arizona St.
173 Oregon St.
thanks for posting the current net rankings. I think you're right. Our OOC home losses basically killed our net.

Still, we play 4 of those teams ahead of us so there is a chance. Unfortunately, we win on the road against a Quad 1 team and lose on the road to a Quad 1 team, and our Net still dropped?!!??

At least with the changed NIT rules we don't have to worry about getting to 500.




We haven't been to the NIt in awhile and I know the rules have kinda changed in the last few years. So does anyone know what it takes nowadays to get into the NIT? Cause I have no idea. Are we even on the bubble right now?
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

HoopDreams said:

BearSD said:

HoopDreams said:

We don't need a 500 record if we have the top 2 NET ranking after NCAA teams

It's possible we can get there if some Pac12 teams above us are invited to ncaa

"NIT Changes:

For the 2024 NIT, conference regular season champions that do not win their conference tournament or are not otherwise selected to the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship will not receive an automatic bid to the NIT. Instead, the NIT will guarantee two teams (based on the NET rankings) from each of six conferences (Atlantic Coast, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeastern). The top two teams in the NET rankings not qualifying for the NCAA men's basketball tournament from each conference, regardless of won-loss record, will be selected. Additionally, the 12 teams automatically selected will be guaranteed the opportunity to host a game in the first round of the NIT. "
There's no chance of that many Pac-12 teams being invited to the NCAAs.

It's possible that only Arizona and Wazzu get in. Either CU or UU might make it if they win nearly all of their remaining games. Any other team would have to win the Pac-12 tournament to get in. Even *if* by some weird set of circumstances both CU and UU were invited -and- a team outside the top four won the Pac-12 tournament, that's just five. Even under that very unlikely scenario, only the #6 and #7 Pac teams would be selected for the NIT. More likely, those two NIT picks will go to Oregon and either CU or UU, or to both CU and UU if neither is selected for the NCAA field.

Here are the NET rankings of Pac-12 teams, as of Monday afternoon:

3 Arizona
31 Washington St.
42 Colorado
50 Utah
61 Oregon
72 Washington
103 Stanford
105 UCLA
108 USC
120 California
135 Arizona St.
173 Oregon St.
thanks for posting the current net rankings. I think you're right. Our OOC home losses basically killed our net.

Still, we play 4 of those teams ahead of us so there is a chance. Unfortunately, we win on the road against a Quad 1 team and lose on the road to a Quad 1 team, and our Net still dropped?!!??

At least with the changed NIT rules we don't have to worry about getting to 500.




We haven't been to the NIt in awhile and I know the rules have kinda changed in the last few years. So does anyone know what it takes nowadays to get into the NIT? Cause I have no idea. Are we even on the bubble right now?
seems like the clearest path to the NIT starting this year is to be in a power conference and have the top 2 Nets of the rest of the conference excluding NCAA teams.

If the team doesn't qualify under that condition, be one of the highest-ranked teams in the NCAA of the remaining teams
Johnfox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Basically, our only shots for any tournament is win out the rest of the season (CBI), or win out the Pac 12 tourney for a March Madness bid. Sucks that our losses to Pacific and Montana State killed our NIT chances + other tournament chances.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quad this and Quad that… I really haven't been paying attention to the NET metrics, but I take it they don't weight recent games all that much more than the earlier ones? Because this is a MUCH better team than the one that lost to… ugh… UOP. No way we should be 120.

OTOH, Madsen needs to figure out how to get a bunch of new players up to speed faster, seeing how we will be going thru this process again next season.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnfox said:

Basically, our only shots for any tournament is win out the rest of the season (CBI), or win out the Pac 12 tourney for a March Madness bid. Sucks that our losses to Pacific and Montana State killed our NIT chances + other tournament chances.
If we at least finish .500 doesn't NIT factor in possible gate revenue and TV revenue? My guess is that this year they would figure that after several horrible seasons, a Cal NIT game might bring in a halfway decent attendance. After all, as usual its all about $$$.
BeachedBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

Johnfox said:

Basically, our only shots for any tournament is win out the rest of the season (CBI), or win out the Pac 12 tourney for a March Madness bid. Sucks that our losses to Pacific and Montana State killed our NIT chances + other tournament chances.
If we at least finish .500 doesn't NIT factor in possible gate revenue and TV revenue? My guess is that this year they would figure that after several horrible seasons, a Cal NIT game might bring in a halfway decent attendance. After all, as usual its all about $$$.
Agree that it would be nice to make the NIT and host a game!

But Cal is 11-15 with 6 games to play (more if they win in P12 tourney). So they really need to make a run at the end here and in the p12 tourney to even have a chance. And if they get THAT hot, maybe they pull off one of those fun cinderella conference tourney runs to make the NCAA and knock out one of those 'last 4 in' teams!

That's what I'm hoping for!

calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

HoopDreams said:

BearSD said:

HoopDreams said:

We don't need a 500 record if we have the top 2 NET ranking after NCAA teams

It's possible we can get there if some Pac12 teams above us are invited to ncaa

"NIT Changes:

For the 2024 NIT, conference regular season champions that do not win their conference tournament or are not otherwise selected to the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship will not receive an automatic bid to the NIT. Instead, the NIT will guarantee two teams (based on the NET rankings) from each of six conferences (Atlantic Coast, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeastern). The top two teams in the NET rankings not qualifying for the NCAA men's basketball tournament from each conference, regardless of won-loss record, will be selected. Additionally, the 12 teams automatically selected will be guaranteed the opportunity to host a game in the first round of the NIT. "
There's no chance of that many Pac-12 teams being invited to the NCAAs.

It's possible that only Arizona and Wazzu get in. Either CU or UU might make it if they win nearly all of their remaining games. Any other team would have to win the Pac-12 tournament to get in. Even *if* by some weird set of circumstances both CU and UU were invited -and- a team outside the top four won the Pac-12 tournament, that's just five. Even under that very unlikely scenario, only the #6 and #7 Pac teams would be selected for the NIT. More likely, those two NIT picks will go to Oregon and either CU or UU, or to both CU and UU if neither is selected for the NCAA field.

Here are the NET rankings of Pac-12 teams, as of Monday afternoon:

3 Arizona
31 Washington St.
42 Colorado
50 Utah
61 Oregon
72 Washington
103 Stanford
105 UCLA
108 USC
120 California
135 Arizona St.
173 Oregon St.
thanks for posting the current net rankings. I think you're right. Our OOC home losses basically killed our net.

Still, we play 4 of those teams ahead of us so there is a chance. Unfortunately, we win on the road against a Quad 1 team and lose on the road to a Quad 1 team, and our Net still dropped?!!??

At least with the changed NIT rules we don't have to worry about getting to 500.




Southern Indiana was selected for the CBI last year with a 16-16 record. No one with a losing record was selected.not hopefull


Exactly. We need to get to .500 for the CBI which means we pretty much need to win out the remaining 5 games of the regular season, or if we lose one, win two games in the conference tournament.

However, if we can do that, let's just win the PAC-12 Tournament and go to the NCAA Tournament as "Pac-12 Champ" and the automatic qualifier.

And yes, we have a better chance of either of those things happening than going to the NIT. If we beat Oregon, Colorado, and Utah we are going to burst their bubbles sending two them to the NIT for sure.
calbear80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If we win 3 of the remaining 5 regular season conference games, we'll be 10-10 in the conference. The if we win a couple of games in the PAC-12 Tournament, then we'll finish 12-11 in the PAC-12. That would be the only way we deserve to be considered for any kind of post season. Otherwise, with a losing conference record and losing overall record, forget about it.

Go Bears!
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear80 said:

If we win 3 of the remaining 5 regular season conference games, we'll be 10-10 in the conference. The if we win a couple of games in the PAC-12 Tournament, then we'll finish 12-11 in the PAC-12. That would be the only way we deserve to be considered for any kind of post season. Otherwise, with a losing conference record and losing overall record, forget about it.

Go Bears!


Enjoy every game left. There will be no post season, in my opinion. Is the Cit still in business?
Go Bears!
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

calbear80 said:

If we win 3 of the remaining 5 regular season conference games, we'll be 10-10 in the conference. The if we win a couple of games in the PAC-12 Tournament, then we'll finish 12-11 in the PAC-12. That would be the only way we deserve to be considered for any kind of post season. Otherwise, with a losing conference record and losing overall record, forget about it.

Go Bears!


Enjoy every game left. There will be no post season, in my opinion. Is the Cit still in business?


PAC-12 Tournament is our postseason. Win or go home. Keep winning and we are National Champions.
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:



Enjoy every game left. There will be no post season, in my opinion. Is the Cit still in business?

Yes, but we'd have to change our name to Concordia U.
https://www.cune.edu/athletics/hosted-tournaments-and-meets/concordia-invitational-tournament

I'm not measuring this season on any post-season play, but by quality wins and how we recruit for 24-25. We already have wins to be proud of, Madsen's done his job in the W column. The jury is out on the recruitment class and portal fishing derby.

RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

oskidunker said:

calbear80 said:

If we win 3 of the remaining 5 regular season conference games, we'll be 10-10 in the conference. The if we win a couple of games in the PAC-12 Tournament, then we'll finish 12-11 in the PAC-12. That would be the only way we deserve to be considered for any kind of post season. Otherwise, with a losing conference record and losing overall record, forget about it.

Go Bears!


Enjoy every game left. There will be no post season, in my opinion. Is the Cit still in business?


PAC-12 Tournament is our postseason. Win or go home. Keep winning and we are National Champions.
Sometimes simplicity is the best approach!
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.