DrDanger;842298723 said:
Again...let me reiterate: Larry Krystkowiak.
Sounds good to me. You say he'd be "more than interested". What makes you say that?
DrDanger;842298723 said:
Again...let me reiterate: Larry Krystkowiak.
DrDanger;842298723 said:
Again...let me reiterate: Larry Krystkowiak.
PappyVW65;842298726 said:
Moreland Smith
Excellence
smokeyrover;842298729 said:
Great.
Carter Blanchard or Ty Keenan.
Norman Dale would be good too.
BC Calfan;842298573 said:
Jay wright - remember hearing he was interested before Monty. I think his sister lives here, married to frank Somerville?
GB54;842298688 said:
Charles would put people in the seats
antipattern;842298722 said:
Somewhere between 75 and 90% of the names listed in this thread would never come here. Tommy Amaker just turned down Wake Forest. Shaka Smart has turned down everybody there is in the last two years (which may have been a mistake on his part, but he still has lots of options). Sluggo pointed out that his list is unrealistic, is that what's going on for everyone? Just spit-balling names that you'd like to see regardless of reality? Well, in case you believe what you're saying, let me just say that Archie Miller is not coming to Cal. He's one of the hottest young names around, and will hold out for an offer at a blue-blood program. Fred Hoiberg? Puh-lease!
And yet when some one who isn't Archie Miller or Fred Hoiberg or Gregg Marshall gets hired, a lot of you same people are going to bitch and moan that Sandy should be fired for not hiring some one who was never going to come here. It makes it tough to take those kind of criticisms seriously.
drdanger;842298529 said:
1. Played for monty.
2. Pac 12 experience as a hc. Also coached at montana.
3. Imo was coach of the year with what he did at utah after last year.
4. Is not a mormon.
5. Nba experience as a 10 year player. Still young enough to relate.
6. He would be more than interested in the job....
Cal Panda Bear;842298555 said:
Not ready yet to be a HC IMO.
grandmastapoop;842298765 said:
I have no opinion on this - but I am curious what you base your opinion on.
HKBear97;842298777 said:
If you look at DeCuire's resume, it consists of:
High School Head Coach
Community College Head Coach for two years
Five years as an assistant coach at a decent mid-major
Six years as an assistant coach at a decent major conference school
I would hope this program could find a candidate with a stronger resume than that.
Jeff82;842298793 said:
We're a school with mediocre administrative support, mediocre alumni and student support, and mediocre facilities. No established head coach, like those on the earlier list, is going to leave their current job to come here. Therefore, the next coach will be one of the coaches fired from their current job, someone toiling in obscurity, like the UC Irvine coach, or an assistant. I actually think Dennis Gates would be a good choice, as he was a defensive specialist, and is young enough to relate to players.
My biggest fear is that the retirement is going to result in a wave of transfers, requiring the program to be completely rebuilt from the ground floor.
SoFlaBear;842298609 said:
If all else failed, get Seth Greenberg from ESPN -- but I like this list.
Miles won't come. Nebraska's program is rising, and he just got a stunning new arena.
Jeff82;842298793 said:
We're a school with mediocre administrative support, mediocre alumni and student support, and mediocre facilities. No established head coach, like those on the earlier list, is going to leave their current job to come here. Therefore, the next coach will be one of the coaches fired from their current job, someone toiling in obscurity, like the UC Irvine coach, or an assistant. I actually think Dennis Gates would be a good choice, as he was a defensive specialist, and is young enough to relate to players.
My biggest fear is that the retirement is going to result in a wave of transfers, requiring the program to be completely rebuilt from the ground floor.
TheSouseFamily;842298825 said:
Jerod Haase, anyone? 18-13 this year at UAB with an upset over UNC. Plus, coaching stints at UNC and Kansas. Inherited a 15-16 team and has them now at 18-13 in two years. Not great but certainly not bad either.
socaltownie;842298557 said:
You are showing your youth. He struggled at UCLA - in large part because 5 stars will NOT - in all but the rarest circumstances - buy into a system that demands in your face defensive on ball pressure. But at Pitt his teams were amazing to watch. They played with a huge amount of intensity on the defensive side of the rock and just frustrated the "crap" out of teams.
Again, the unknowable (by us) is how Ben is seen by the audience that matters - recruits, players, AAU types. If he is damaged, move on. If he is not, then I think you simply have to make a call to feel him out and talk about stuff.
calumnus;842298848 said:
Please, no! With Howland at Cal we would have Montgomery's recruiting and player unhappiness (all worse actually) combined with Braun's stagnant offense.
CALiforniALUM;842298849 said:
In all fairness to Howland, I think he thrust himself into a pretty bad situation at UCLA. The expectation of the type of players he was supposed to recruit and cater to were 180 degrees from what got him there. As he moved through his tenure there he got further from the way he wanted to do things and as a result lost his focus and the support of his players and a very difficult fan base. I don't really like his (Pitt) brand of basketball, but I think it would be much more successful at Cal than what people observed at UCLA.
Quote:
Walton: "Do they look like they're having a good time? Are they playing great basketball? Are they selling tickets? Is this an atmosphere that you would say, 'Yeah.' This looks like people are getting ready to go to the dentist."
californialum;842298849 said:
in all fairness to howland, i think he thrust himself into a pretty bad situation at ucla. The expectation of the type of players he was supposed to recruit and cater to were 180 degrees from what got him there. As he moved through his tenure there he got further from the way he wanted to do things and as a result lost his focus and the support of his players and a very difficult fan base. I don't really like his (pitt) brand of basketball, but i think it would be much more successful at cal than what people observed at ucla.
tsubamoto2001;842298830 said:
He bailed on Cal. I know about the whole Bozeman thing, but he bailed. I'd even go for Rex Walters over him.
grandmastapoop;842298856 said:
Ridiculous. If you were working at a company and knew that the boss was doing something illegal that would have ramifications on the company and everyone working there, no one would hold it against you for "bailing". You'd probably be praised for your integrity.
89Bear;842298859 said:
Would say Larry K but I don't think anyone leaves a PAC 12 job to take over the Bears
calumnus;842298860 said:
I don't think that is why he bailed, and I seem to remember him somewhat dissing Berkeley in the process (or saying he wasn't comfortable here?), but if we think he would be a good coach and he wants to come then what happened 20 years ago when he was a teenager and circumstances were different should not be a factor.
smokeyrover;842298747 said:
Agree...a lot of flailing around right now with the flavors of the month hot off the press.
I'm on record at wanting DeCuire to get a chance. But I can understand arguments against.
One name that hasn't been mentioned is Russ Turner at U.C. Irvine. Former Monty asst at Furd and Warriors, so the system would be very similar -- you get the continuity aspect that DeCuire would bring, but Turner has more experience as a head coach.