Part 2 of 2- UPDATES => Added mugshots + embedded links to CS stats & to commit writeups from SwimSwam
-------
Day 2 |
500 Free (4:46.25 -> 2018 Pac12 C Final) Day 3 |
400 IM (4:27.55 -> Pac12, #29 in prelims) Day 4 |
1650 Free (16:24.31 -> Pac12 Timed Final, #13) Alternative Events:
Day 3 |
200 Free (1:50.42 -> Pac12, #38 in prelims) -------
Day 2 |
50 Free (23.27 -> 2018 Pac12, #30 in prelims) Day 3 |
100 Breast (1:03.63 -> Pac12 C Final) Day 4 |
100 Free (50.56 -> Pac12, #27 in prelims) Alternative Events:
Day 4 |
200 Breast (2:21.04 -> Pac12, #32 in prelims) -------
Should be pointed out that
Izz's the only 2019 Baby Bear who has achieved an individual time projected to score at NCAAs (200 Free, 100 Free, 200 IM), along with the likelihood of making a contribution to our relays @ Nattys.
As soberly noted by
BD, "need two or three four year scorers per class to credibly compete for NCAA titles".
To be fair though, I believe there are less than 8 or 9 recruits on
SwimSwam's TOP 20 NCAA SWIMMING RECRUITS IN THE GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL CLASS OF 2019 who currently holds a time that would have qualified for finals @ 2018 NCAAs...
Indeed, there's only ONE uncommitted recruit from that Top 20 list who has accomplished a time falling within scoring territory -
Katharine Berkoff (aka KB3), whose 100 back & 200 Back bests would have placed in the B final @ 2018 NCAAs. KB3's rumoured to be an Ivies lean, though I'm sure the furdettes as well as a number of top swim programmes would love to snag the 2019 backstroke ace!
Remaining top level as-yet-to-commits are a pair of Top 20 in-state studs, who could be targeted by Greg down on the Farm - but even this duo don't yet have quite the speed yet to qualify for an NCAA invite, in spite of having impressively dropped considerable time in several of their events as recently as May -
Ayla Spitz (50 Free @ CIF Section Champs, 100 Free & 200 Free @ Sunset League Champs), and
Alexandra Crisera (100 back @ 2018 CIF Section Champs).
Well, trying not to look too far ahead lol, the amazing 2020 class of course also beckons in the guise of
Alex Walsh,
Regan Smith,
Isabelle Stadden,
Phoebe Bacon,
Olivia Bray...
At any rate, back to the present hehe - our
2019 commits will have their forthcoming Senior year of competition to strive for further improving upon their HS lifetime bests, with several of them solid bets to earn that much sought-after invite to the big dance by their sophomore or junior year if not earlier, after some top class training at Cal.
Here's where they would have ranked on the
2018 NCAA Pre-Selection List with their current PBs (have only listed those falling in the
top 100):
#50 @
200 Fly .......
Ashlyn#51 @
200 IM ....
Chloe#51 @
1650 Free ...
Sarah#62 @
1650 Free ...
Ashlyn#64 @
200 Fly ........
Sarah#65 @
200 Fly ........
Rachel#66 @
1650 Free ....
Anna #69 @
200 Free ......
Rachel#73 @
200 Back .....
Danielle#75 @
400 IM .........
Chloe#79 @
500 Free ......
Sarah#81 @
100 Back .....
Chloe#83 @
100 Back .....
Danielle#93 @
400 IM .........
Ashlyn #95 @
100 Free ......
Chloe#97 @
400 IM .........
Sarah ... where #37 is the nominal NCAA cutoff line for invites.-------
Will be interesting to see how Sarah, Ashlyn & Rachel develop in the mile & 200 Fly since these events fall on the same competition day (or which direction they will lean towards under Teri's guidance). Sarah & Ashlyn also seem to fit the 400 IM / 200 Fly / Distance mould of swimmers.
As for the
1000 Free which is typically only contested @
dual meets, Bears will for once be able to field a rather solid sub ten-minute cadre in Ashlyn (9:46.42), Sarah (9:46.65), Rachel (9:51.23) & Anna (9:53.60). For reference, Cal's #2 all-time best in this race = Chenoa (9:40.26). #7 Missy was 9:47.44.
Does appear that with this class, Bears will enjoy an unprecedented depth of talent in events where we haven't had much success with or representation in recent history - distance, longer IM & butterfly...well at least at the
Conference &
Dual meet level!
Goes without saying that the usual caveats & caution applies - this is no means a comprehensive or even accurate assessment of their likely events ... static snapshots of best times aren't always the most accurate indicators of predicted performance ... should really also take into account the overall context, such as progression history & improvement curve (take note of, for example, Danielle & Emma's significant time drops recently), performance consistency & timing, background & environment (Emma being a 2 sport student-athlete who had only started to train full-time since Jan 2017), injuries & other setbacks (Ashlyn's battle w/scoliosis), team needs, etc etc.
Go Bears!
-------