The Senate Is a Joke

17,392 Views | 205 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by concordtom
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Senate is proving itself to be a laughingstock of a legislative body completely opposed to the concept of "government of the people, by the people, for the people". It was designed to be a bulwark against the will of the American people by the slaveowning founders in the 1700's and that role is even stronger today. The original role of the Senate to empower wealthy landowning whites moves forward to this day, to the disgrace of our nation

After threatening to prevent the transfer of power in the Senate to Democrats, which McConnell had the power to do because the Senate is absurd, McConnell is now threatening that if Democrats implement rules to his disliking he will essentially shut down the Senate, which he has the power to do because the Senate is absurd. Just by constantly demanding quorum calls the Senate can be ground to a halt, because the Senate is absurd, and that is exactly what McConnell threatens to do.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mcconnell-warns-of-scorched-earth-post-nuclear-senate-promises-nightmare-if-dems-end-filibuster

The Senate is the enemy of the American people. Democrats in the Senate represent 41 million more people than Republicans in the Senate. But that is not enough for legislation. Most legislation requires all the Democrats plus 10 Republicans. And the Senate can't be fixed without the consent of the minority of Americans that it empowers. In other words, a tyranny that can't be broken without the consent of the tyrant.

This is the U.S.Constitution. It is broken. The American people need to recognize that fact.

https://www.vox.com/2021/1/6/22215728/senate-anti-democratic-one-number-raphael-warnock-jon-ossoff-georgia-runoffs

American Vermin
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?


I agree, impeachment is a joke.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Charlie Kirk is a moron. And so are you.
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This impeachment doesn't mean anything. The Chief Justice isn't presiding, which means they're trying a civilian which isn't a thing. Biden isn't going to give a Covid relief bill till March. Maybe dumb**** dems can work on **** that matters.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?





Chief: Have you been following Rand Paul?
Callahan: Yeah, I've been following him on my own time. And anybody can tell I didn't do that to him.
Chief: How?
Callahan: Cause he looks too damn good, that's how!
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

This impeachment doesn't mean anything. The Chief Justice isn't presiding, which means they're trying a civilian which isn't a thing. Biden isn't going to give a Covid relief bill till March. Maybe dumb**** dems can work on **** that matters.
The impeachment is incredibly important.

Remove Trump from the equation.

Just consider a generic President who has lost re-election and is about to be removed from office. If she attempts a coup to stay in power, under the Republican methodology she will have no negative consequences. If the coup succeeds she will be in power and have no negative consequences. If the coup fails, she will be out of power but have no negative consequences because now she is a private citizen so who cares, or something like that.

How long can a Republic stand if there is no negative and only positive consequences for trying to end that Republic?
American Vermin
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

MinotStateBeav said:

This impeachment doesn't mean anything. The Chief Justice isn't presiding, which means they're trying a civilian which isn't a thing. Biden isn't going to give a Covid relief bill till March. Maybe dumb**** dems can work on **** that matters.
The impeachment is incredibly important.

Remove Trump from the equation.

Just consider a generic President who has lost re-election and is about to be removed from office. If she attempts a coup to stay in power, under the Republican methodology she will have no negative consequences. If the coup succeeds she will be in power and have no negative consequences. If the coup fails, she will be out of power but have no negative consequences because now she is a private citizen so who cares, or something like that.

How long can a Republic stand if there is no negative and only positive consequences for trying to end that Republic?


IOIYAR
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

MinotStateBeav said:

This impeachment doesn't mean anything. The Chief Justice isn't presiding, which means they're trying a civilian which isn't a thing. Biden isn't going to give a Covid relief bill till March. Maybe dumb**** dems can work on **** that matters.
The impeachment is incredibly important.

Remove Trump from the equation.

Just consider a generic President who has lost re-election and is about to be removed from office. If she attempts a coup to stay in power, under the Republican methodology she will have no negative consequences. If the coup succeeds she will be in power and have no negative consequences. If the coup fails, she will be out of power but have no negative consequences because now she is a private citizen so who cares, or something like that.

How long can a Republic stand if there is no negative and only positive consequences for trying to end that Republic?

There was no coup.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
45 spineless hypocrites with their lips attached to Trump's arse. You must be jealous.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

45 spineless hypocrites with their lips attached to Trump's arse. You must be jealous.


Get some.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So, this Office of the Former President...

All it is is an instrument to fleece people of their money for Trump's relevance and profit. It's only purpose is to benefit Trump, not America, not the GOP - only Trump.

If the remaining elected GOP legislators were smart (and had any dignity and self respect), they would impeach his ass and cut off his funding which otherwise would go TO THEM!

So, the Senators have a choice:

A: Continue to be beholden to Trump by not impeaching, thus continuing to tell their own bases that Trump is The man. Keep the Trump yoke around their necks and kiss his butt.

or

B: Impeach Trump, disgrace him, allow horrible stories about him to surface without shutting down. Finish him off. This bolsters their own remaining party and themselves.

Seems pretty easy, but I guess the GOP leaders are truly wacko *****cats afraid of Trump. Sad.
Go!Bears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Charlie Kirk is a moron. And so are you.
Paul is counting on most Americans being as stupid as people who think he is smart.
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

MinotStateBeav said:

This impeachment doesn't mean anything. The Chief Justice isn't presiding, which means they're trying a civilian which isn't a thing. Biden isn't going to give a Covid relief bill till March. Maybe dumb**** dems can work on **** that matters.
The impeachment is incredibly important.

Remove Trump from the equation.

Just consider a generic President who has lost re-election and is about to be removed from office. If she attempts a coup to stay in power, under the Republican methodology she will have no negative consequences. If the coup succeeds she will be in power and have no negative consequences. If the coup fails, she will be out of power but have no negative consequences because now she is a private citizen so who cares, or something like that.

How long can a Republic stand if there is no negative and only positive consequences for trying to end that Republic?
Just realize you are talking to a guy who was cheerleading the mob as they were spreading feces on the wall of the Capitol. He wants the Republic to fall.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

This impeachment doesn't mean anything. The Chief Justice isn't presiding, which means they're trying a civilian which isn't a thing. Biden isn't going to give a Covid relief bill till March. Maybe dumb**** dems can work on **** that matters.
Well, now I know where YOU stand.

President seeds lies and a Capitol riot, but you want him off on an imagined technicality - and then immediately move to criticize the other side.

Very pathetic.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownBear said:

dajo9 said:

MinotStateBeav said:

This impeachment doesn't mean anything. The Chief Justice isn't presiding, which means they're trying a civilian which isn't a thing. Biden isn't going to give a Covid relief bill till March. Maybe dumb**** dems can work on **** that matters.
The impeachment is incredibly important.

Remove Trump from the equation.

Just consider a generic President who has lost re-election and is about to be removed from office. If she attempts a coup to stay in power, under the Republican methodology she will have no negative consequences. If the coup succeeds she will be in power and have no negative consequences. If the coup fails, she will be out of power but have no negative consequences because now she is a private citizen so who cares, or something like that.

How long can a Republic stand if there is no negative and only positive consequences for trying to end that Republic?
Just realize you are talking to a guy who was cheerleading the mob as they were spreading feces on the wall of the Capitol. He wants the Republic to fall.

Personally, I think tanks would work better than horns and feces to topple the Republic.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Go!Bears said:

AunBear89 said:

Charlie Kirk is a moron. And so are you.
Paul is counting on most Americans being as stupid as people who think he is smart.


A person really has to ask himself this question:
Is it a good idea to look to a man for wisdom that wears a dead ferret on his head and created his own medical board so that he could board certify himself?

Biden should give the neighbor that kicked Rand Paul's a$$ the Medal of Freedom. Now that would be a Big Swinging D@ick move.



*Rand is a walking sh@it stain of a human being:

The Recklessness of Rand Paul, Coronavirus Patient - The Atlantic


https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/03/rand-paul-coronavirus-test-reckless/608593/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/608593/
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

The Senate is proving itself to be a laughingstock of a legislative body completely opposed to the concept of "government of the people, by the people, for the people". It was designed to be a bulwark against the will of the American people by the slaveowning founders in the 1700's and that role is even stronger today. The original role of the Senate to empower wealthy landowning whites moves forward to this day, to the disgrace of our nation

That's pretty much true. The House is supposed to represent the common man. However, the House is full of even bigger idiots thanks to gerrymandering.




bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

This impeachment doesn't mean anything. The Chief Justice isn't presiding, which means they're trying a civilian which isn't a thing. Biden isn't going to give a Covid relief bill till March. Maybe dumb**** dems can work on **** that matters.
What would you and your ilk have said/done if Obama and Hillary had proclaimed the 2016 election was a fraud, brought dozens of frivolous suits before judges, vaguely threaten Secretaries of States' that they'd better "find votes" to overturn election results and incited a mob to attack the Capitol where electoral votes were in the process of being certified? And all this resulting in several deaths and suicides. I have a good idea what your reaction would've been if it was Democrats who attacked the very heart of our Democracy.
This just in: Republicans find another whistleblower who claims Hillary's emails were proven to be on Hunter's laptop while Obama spied on tRump as he sat (shat?) upon his golden toilet. Gym Jordan afraid whistle blower may be in danger of abduction by aliens in cahoots with Democrats.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoOskie said:

MinotStateBeav said:

This impeachment doesn't mean anything. The Chief Justice isn't presiding, which means they're trying a civilian which isn't a thing. Biden isn't going to give a Covid relief bill till March. Maybe dumb**** dems can work on **** that matters.
What would you and your ilk have said/done if Obama and Hillary had proclaimed the 2016 election was a fraud....
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fweedom Baby said:

dajo9 said:

The Senate is proving itself to be a laughingstock of a legislative body completely opposed to the concept of "government of the people, by the people, for the people". It was designed to be a bulwark against the will of the American people by the slaveowning founders in the 1700's and that role is even stronger today. The original role of the Senate to empower wealthy landowning whites moves forward to this day, to the disgrace of our nation

After threatening to prevent the transfer of power in the Senate to Democrats, which McConnell had the power to do because the Senate is absurd, McConnell is now threatening that if Democrats implement rules to his disliking he will essentially shut down the Senate, which he has the power to do because the Senate is absurd. Just by constantly demanding quorum calls the Senate can be ground to a halt, because the Senate is absurd, and that is exactly what McConnell threatens to do.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mcconnell-warns-of-scorched-earth-post-nuclear-senate-promises-nightmare-if-dems-end-filibuster

The Senate is the enemy of the American people. Democrats in the Senate represent 41 million more people than Republicans in the Senate. But that is not enough for legislation. Most legislation requires all the Democrats plus 10 Republicans. And the Senate can't be fixed without the consent of the minority of Americans that it empowers. In other words, a tyranny that can't be broken without the consent of the tyrant.

This is the U.S.Constitution. It is broken. The American people need to recognize that fact.

https://www.vox.com/2021/1/6/22215728/senate-anti-democratic-one-number-raphael-warnock-jon-ossoff-georgia-runoffs
Take it up with the Democrats, Karen. They had the chance to end the filibuster and passed.


Karen. Original.

Conservative Democrats from West Virginia and Arizona are preventing that. How many conservative Democrats are out there nationally? Not many. Yet, because the Senate and U.S. Constitution empower states over people, they call the shots and are able to override the will of the American people. The most undemocratic legislative body in the semi-free world.
American Vermin
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats Suck said:

dajo9 said:

Fweedom Baby said:

dajo9 said:

The Senate is proving itself to be a laughingstock of a legislative body completely opposed to the concept of "government of the people, by the people, for the people". It was designed to be a bulwark against the will of the American people by the slaveowning founders in the 1700's and that role is even stronger today. The original role of the Senate to empower wealthy landowning whites moves forward to this day, to the disgrace of our nation

After threatening to prevent the transfer of power in the Senate to Democrats, which McConnell had the power to do because the Senate is absurd, McConnell is now threatening that if Democrats implement rules to his disliking he will essentially shut down the Senate, which he has the power to do because the Senate is absurd. Just by constantly demanding quorum calls the Senate can be ground to a halt, because the Senate is absurd, and that is exactly what McConnell threatens to do.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mcconnell-warns-of-scorched-earth-post-nuclear-senate-promises-nightmare-if-dems-end-filibuster

The Senate is the enemy of the American people. Democrats in the Senate represent 41 million more people than Republicans in the Senate. But that is not enough for legislation. Most legislation requires all the Democrats plus 10 Republicans. And the Senate can't be fixed without the consent of the minority of Americans that it empowers. In other words, a tyranny that can't be broken without the consent of the tyrant.

This is the U.S.Constitution. It is broken. The American people need to recognize that fact.

https://www.vox.com/2021/1/6/22215728/senate-anti-democratic-one-number-raphael-warnock-jon-ossoff-georgia-runoffs
Take it up with the Democrats, Karen. They had the chance to end the filibuster and passed.
Karen. Original.

Conservative Democrats from West Virginia and Arizona are preventing that. How many conservative Democrats are out there nationally? Not many. Yet, because the Senate and U.S. Constitution empower states over people, they call the shots and are able to override the will of the American people. The most undemocratic legislative body in the semi-free world.
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/99762/replies/1834248
Quote:

Now that $2,000 checks have been blocked in the Republican Senate, the only hope for them is if the two Democrats win in Georgia and the Senate flips Democratic.

If Republicans hold the Senate there will be no $2,000 checks as Trump and Pelosi and Biden would like.
Now the Democrats hold the Senate, there aren't any checks, and you're still crying about how the Senate keeps the Democrats from doing anything.

The Democrats are why the Democrats aren't doing anything, of course, but you're too stupid to see that.


You're too stupid to know the difference between Joe Manchin and 90% of Democrats. I've been fighting the likes of Joe Manchin since before you decided to deign to get involved in politics.

Because we won in Georgia there is hope for Covid relief. Now we have to overcome the couple of overly empowered conservative Democrats in the Senate.

You hope the conservatives win though. You don't want Covid relief. You want to see Dems lose.
American Vermin
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Democrats Suck said:

dajo9 said:

Fweedom Baby said:

dajo9 said:

The Senate is proving itself to be a laughingstock of a legislative body completely opposed to the concept of "government of the people, by the people, for the people". It was designed to be a bulwark against the will of the American people by the slaveowning founders in the 1700's and that role is even stronger today. The original role of the Senate to empower wealthy landowning whites moves forward to this day, to the disgrace of our nation

After threatening to prevent the transfer of power in the Senate to Democrats, which McConnell had the power to do because the Senate is absurd, McConnell is now threatening that if Democrats implement rules to his disliking he will essentially shut down the Senate, which he has the power to do because the Senate is absurd. Just by constantly demanding quorum calls the Senate can be ground to a halt, because the Senate is absurd, and that is exactly what McConnell threatens to do.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mcconnell-warns-of-scorched-earth-post-nuclear-senate-promises-nightmare-if-dems-end-filibuster

The Senate is the enemy of the American people. Democrats in the Senate represent 41 million more people than Republicans in the Senate. But that is not enough for legislation. Most legislation requires all the Democrats plus 10 Republicans. And the Senate can't be fixed without the consent of the minority of Americans that it empowers. In other words, a tyranny that can't be broken without the consent of the tyrant.

This is the U.S.Constitution. It is broken. The American people need to recognize that fact.

https://www.vox.com/2021/1/6/22215728/senate-anti-democratic-one-number-raphael-warnock-jon-ossoff-georgia-runoffs
Take it up with the Democrats, Karen. They had the chance to end the filibuster and passed.
Karen. Original.

Conservative Democrats from West Virginia and Arizona are preventing that. How many conservative Democrats are out there nationally? Not many. Yet, because the Senate and U.S. Constitution empower states over people, they call the shots and are able to override the will of the American people. The most undemocratic legislative body in the semi-free world.
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/99762/replies/1834248
Quote:

Now that $2,000 checks have been blocked in the Republican Senate, the only hope for them is if the two Democrats win in Georgia and the Senate flips Democratic.

If Republicans hold the Senate there will be no $2,000 checks as Trump and Pelosi and Biden would like.
Now the Democrats hold the Senate, there aren't any checks, and you're still crying about how the Senate keeps the Democrats from doing anything.

The Democrats are why the Democrats aren't doing anything, of course, but you're too stupid to see that.


You're too stupid to know the difference between Joe Manchin and 90% of Democrats. I've been fighting the likes of Joe Manchin since before you decided to deign to get involved in politics.

Because we won in Georgia there is hope for Covid relief. Now we have to overcome the couple of overly empowered conservative Democrats in the Senate.

You hope the conservatives win though. You don't want Covid relief. You want to see Dems lose.

The Democrats have also held the Senate for all of a week. Legislation doesn't tend to move that quickly, especially since there are a lot of provisions to negotiate.

I'm all for holding their feet to the fire here, but we should also be realistic.
calpoly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownGrinch said:

dajo9 said:

MinotStateBeav said:

This impeachment doesn't mean anything. The Chief Justice isn't presiding, which means they're trying a civilian which isn't a thing. Biden isn't going to give a Covid relief bill till March. Maybe dumb**** dems can work on **** that matters.
The impeachment is incredibly important.

Remove Trump from the equation.

Just consider a generic President who has lost re-election and is about to be removed from office. If she attempts a coup to stay in power, under the Republican methodology she will have no negative consequences. If the coup succeeds she will be in power and have no negative consequences. If the coup fails, she will be out of power but have no negative consequences because now she is a private citizen so who cares, or something like that.

How long can a Republic stand if there is no negative and only positive consequences for trying to end that Republic?
The impeachment is stupid and performative. They went ahead with it anyway knowing it had no chance for political gains. Having a trial for someone who is already out of office and that wouldn't prevent him from running again even if convicted (which has no chance of happening).

The Twitter suspension was enough to neuter him for the remainder of his term, but stupid Dems wanted to do performative politics again instead of serving their constituents who have real needs. So yes, I'll be happy as hell when all of those performative politicians lose races for playing performative politics while real people need help.
So you believe that impeachment is stupid even when the president tries to overthrow the government? I believe you are the one that is stupid.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats Suck said:

dajo9 said:

Democrats Suck said:

dajo9 said:

Fweedom Baby said:

dajo9 said:

The Senate is proving itself to be a laughingstock of a legislative body completely opposed to the concept of "government of the people, by the people, for the people". It was designed to be a bulwark against the will of the American people by the slaveowning founders in the 1700's and that role is even stronger today. The original role of the Senate to empower wealthy landowning whites moves forward to this day, to the disgrace of our nation

After threatening to prevent the transfer of power in the Senate to Democrats, which McConnell had the power to do because the Senate is absurd, McConnell is now threatening that if Democrats implement rules to his disliking he will essentially shut down the Senate, which he has the power to do because the Senate is absurd. Just by constantly demanding quorum calls the Senate can be ground to a halt, because the Senate is absurd, and that is exactly what McConnell threatens to do.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mcconnell-warns-of-scorched-earth-post-nuclear-senate-promises-nightmare-if-dems-end-filibuster

The Senate is the enemy of the American people. Democrats in the Senate represent 41 million more people than Republicans in the Senate. But that is not enough for legislation. Most legislation requires all the Democrats plus 10 Republicans. And the Senate can't be fixed without the consent of the minority of Americans that it empowers. In other words, a tyranny that can't be broken without the consent of the tyrant.

This is the U.S.Constitution. It is broken. The American people need to recognize that fact.

https://www.vox.com/2021/1/6/22215728/senate-anti-democratic-one-number-raphael-warnock-jon-ossoff-georgia-runoffs
Take it up with the Democrats, Karen. They had the chance to end the filibuster and passed.
Karen. Original.

Conservative Democrats from West Virginia and Arizona are preventing that. How many conservative Democrats are out there nationally? Not many. Yet, because the Senate and U.S. Constitution empower states over people, they call the shots and are able to override the will of the American people. The most undemocratic legislative body in the semi-free world.
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/99762/replies/1834248
Quote:

Now that $2,000 checks have been blocked in the Republican Senate, the only hope for them is if the two Democrats win in Georgia and the Senate flips Democratic.

If Republicans hold the Senate there will be no $2,000 checks as Trump and Pelosi and Biden would like.
Now the Democrats hold the Senate, there aren't any checks, and you're still crying about how the Senate keeps the Democrats from doing anything.

The Democrats are why the Democrats aren't doing anything, of course, but you're too stupid to see that.


You're too stupid to know the difference between Joe Manchin and 90% of Democrats. I've been fighting the likes of Joe Manchin since before you decided to deign to get involved in politics.
Did you encourage all your friends to stop buying Joe Manchin's special coffee brew? Is that how you fought the likes of him?

LOL
No, I went to an irrelevant message board, created 100 aliases and fought with the mods and everybody else over everything. I proved my superiority by being unyielding and uncompromising in all things at all times.
American Vermin
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownGrinch said:

Having a trial for someone who is already out of office and that wouldn't prevent him from running again even if convicted (which has no chance of happening).

This is factually wrong. There is a mechanism for preventing Trump from running again if he were to be convicted.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-explainer/explainer-can-lawmakers-use-impeachment-to-bar-trump-from-holding-office-again-idUSKBN29H1A8
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

OaktownGrinch said:

Having a trial for someone who is already out of office and that wouldn't prevent him from running again even if convicted (which has no chance of happening).

This is factually wrong. There is a mechanism for preventing Trump from running again if he were to be convicted.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-explainer/explainer-can-lawmakers-use-impeachment-to-bar-trump-from-holding-office-again-idUSKBN29H1A8
Article I, Section 3, Clause 7 of the Constitution, with the relevant portion highlighted.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
Bearly Clad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Pro is the opposite of Con then is the opposite of Progress . . . Congress?
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why would the Democrats not want him to run? He's the best thing that ever happened to them.

Conviction was never a goal. This whole impeachment is primarily to drive a wedge in the Republican Party. At first I thought it smart but now it seems they will still all coalesce around him and will stiffen. The longer this goes on the worse this plays out with the public and probably Biden's agenda.
Bearly Clad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Um, because what's best for Democrats politically is not necessarily what's best for America? Having him run again gives him more power to divide the country. Obviously the fractures or his far-right brand of conservatism won't disappear overnight regardless, but allowing one of the worst actors to continue to espouse hateful rhetoric and claim it as political speech will almost definitely lead to more violence
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownGrinch said:

sycasey said:

OaktownGrinch said:

Having a trial for someone who is already out of office and that wouldn't prevent him from running again even if convicted (which has no chance of happening).

This is factually wrong. There is a mechanism for preventing Trump from running again if he were to be convicted.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-explainer/explainer-can-lawmakers-use-impeachment-to-bar-trump-from-holding-office-again-idUSKBN29H1A8
https://abc7.com/can-an-impeached-president-win-a-second-term-in-2024-if-trump-resigns-he-run-again-25th-amendment-was/9568187/
Quote:

Even a Senate vote to remove Trump would not prohibit him from running in 2024; for the Senate to ban him from the presidency, it would have to hold an additional vote on this question.

Yes, I'm aware of that. I just posted an article about it.

The thing is that the vote to ban him from further office is tied to impeachment. So they have to do that first, then hold the other vote.
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

OaktownGrinch said:

sycasey said:

OaktownGrinch said:

Having a trial for someone who is already out of office and that wouldn't prevent him from running again even if convicted (which has no chance of happening).

This is factually wrong. There is a mechanism for preventing Trump from running again if he were to be convicted.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-explainer/explainer-can-lawmakers-use-impeachment-to-bar-trump-from-holding-office-again-idUSKBN29H1A8
https://abc7.com/can-an-impeached-president-win-a-second-term-in-2024-if-trump-resigns-he-run-again-25th-amendment-was/9568187/
Quote:

Even a Senate vote to remove Trump would not prohibit him from running in 2024; for the Senate to ban him from the presidency, it would have to hold an additional vote on this question.

Yes, I'm aware of that. I just posted an article about it.

The thing is that the vote to ban him from further office is tied to impeachment. So they have to do that first, then hold the other vote.


It isn't just that but if there is a conviction they only need a majority vote to ban him from running again. It obviously would happen. Grinchy is just an ignorant fool who upon being called out is looking for a technicality to pretend he wasn't an idiot. His whole point was there was no benefit to impeachment because it wouldn't stop him from running again when clearly if the Democrats succeed it will.

But hey, Biden has been in office over a week now and world temperatures haven't gone down one bit. C'mon man!
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownGrinch said:

sycasey said:

OaktownGrinch said:

Having a trial for someone who is already out of office and that wouldn't prevent him from running again even if convicted (which has no chance of happening).

This is factually wrong. There is a mechanism for preventing Trump from running again if he were to be convicted.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-explainer/explainer-can-lawmakers-use-impeachment-to-bar-trump-from-holding-office-again-idUSKBN29H1A8
https://abc7.com/can-an-impeached-president-win-a-second-term-in-2024-if-trump-resigns-he-run-again-25th-amendment-was/9568187/
Quote:

Even a Senate vote to remove Trump would not prohibit him from running in 2024; for the Senate to ban him from the presidency, it would have to hold an additional vote on this question.

That is right, but, unlike impeachment, it only requires a majority and not a 2/3 vote. Doubt someone is getting impeached but a simple majority cannot agree to disqualify for future office.
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

OaktownGrinch said:

sycasey said:

OaktownGrinch said:

Having a trial for someone who is already out of office and that wouldn't prevent him from running again even if convicted (which has no chance of happening).

This is factually wrong. There is a mechanism for preventing Trump from running again if he were to be convicted.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-explainer/explainer-can-lawmakers-use-impeachment-to-bar-trump-from-holding-office-again-idUSKBN29H1A8
https://abc7.com/can-an-impeached-president-win-a-second-term-in-2024-if-trump-resigns-he-run-again-25th-amendment-was/9568187/
Quote:

Even a Senate vote to remove Trump would not prohibit him from running in 2024; for the Senate to ban him from the presidency, it would have to hold an additional vote on this question.

That is right, but, unlike impeachment, it only requires a majority and not a 2/3 vote. Doubt someone is getting impeached but a simple majority cannot agree to disqualify for future office.


His claim was the equivalent of calling someone wrong for saying a team down 7 could tie with a touchdown because you need the extra point
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.