No, it was a pathetic attack that was neither funny nor grounded in reality. Wise up.

Vaxx Up! There's always another variant

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-studies-link-mrna-vaccines-to

..."our new peer-reviewed study that found catastrophic neurological injury from the COVID-19 mRNA injections.
63 serious safety signals were identified all involving the central nervous system including encephalitis, meningitis, myelitis, demyelination syndromes, brain/spinal cord abscesses, and even CreutzfeldtJakob (prion) disease, which appeared 847 more likely after COVID-19 mRNA shots than after traditional vaccines.

These findings point to COVID-19 vaccine-induced bloodbrain barrier disruption, allowing amyloidogenic spike proteins and pathogens to penetrate the brain and spinal cord an outcome consistent with the skyrocketing rates of cognitive decline now seen across the U.S."
...
"In collaboration with Neo7Bioscience, our team conducted another study demonstrating that mRNA shots dysregulate thousands of human genes, triggering mitochondrial failure, immune collapse, and cancer-promoting activity that can persist for years.

The manuscript was unlawfully wiped from two preprint servers within weeks of going viral by the Journal Cartel and PubPeer Mob but has since been successfully peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in a PubMed.gov-indexed journal, marking a major victory for scientific integrity and a decisive defeat for the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex."
...
"Lastly, two massive population studies (n = 8.7 million) now confirm elevated risks across seven major cancers among the COVID-19 vaccinated."
...
"As I said on air, Pfizer is not a trusted public health partner it operates like a criminal enterprise. With 107 documented penalties, Pfizer's record reads like a catalogue of corporate crime: false marketing, safety breaches, kickback schemes, environmental violations, foreign bribery, and systemic fraud.
According to Violation Tracker, Pfizer's penalties since 2000 total more than $11 billion across criminal, civil, and regulatory cases a staggering figure that exposes a pattern of lawlessness, not isolated mistakes."

Zippergate said:

---

Vaxx Up! There's always another variant

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-studies-link-mrna-vaccines-to

..."our new peer-reviewed study that found catastrophic neurological injury from the COVID-19 mRNA injections.
63 serious safety signals were identified all involving the central nervous system including encephalitis, meningitis, myelitis, demyelination syndromes, brain/spinal cord abscesses, and even CreutzfeldtJakob (prion) disease, which appeared 847 more likely after COVID-19 mRNA shots than after traditional vaccines.

These findings point to COVID-19 vaccine-induced bloodbrain barrier disruption, allowing amyloidogenic spike proteins and pathogens to penetrate the brain and spinal cord an outcome consistent with the skyrocketing rates of cognitive decline now seen across the U.S."
...
"In collaboration with Neo7Bioscience, our team conducted another study demonstrating that mRNA shots dysregulate thousands of human genes, triggering mitochondrial failure, immune collapse, and cancer-promoting activity that can persist for years.

The manuscript was unlawfully wiped from two preprint servers within weeks of going viral by the Journal Cartel and PubPeer Mob but has since been successfully peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in a PubMed.gov-indexed journal, marking a major victory for scientific integrity and a decisive defeat for the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex."
...
"Lastly, two massive population studies (n = 8.7 million) now confirm elevated risks across seven major cancers among the COVID-19 vaccinated."
...
"As I said on air, Pfizer is not a trusted public health partner it operates like a criminal enterprise. With 107 documented penalties, Pfizer's record reads like a catalogue of corporate crime: false marketing, safety breaches, kickback schemes, environmental violations, foreign bribery, and systemic fraud.
According to Violation Tracker, Pfizer's penalties since 2000 total more than $11 billion across criminal, civil, and regulatory cases a staggering figure that exposes a pattern of lawlessness, not isolated mistakes."

---

They lie. They always lie. Don't believe any explanations from the BI liberals for poor Pfizer behavior.

The new evidence also shows Baric gave a presentation to the ODNI in January 2020 stating COVID may have emerged from a lab. Baric said the Wuhan Institute of Virology worked on thousands of coronaviruses at a low biosafety level.

What Baric omitted: He had submitted a grant… pic.twitter.com/JzB8KD2wlD

— Emily Kopp (@emilyakopp) November 11, 2025

Full story:https://t.co/q9aSMcDyWl

— Emily Kopp (@emilyakopp) November 11, 2025

A vax Nazi is someone who refers to a person who believes in the freedom to choose or not to choose to take the Covid vaccine as an anti-vaxxer.

Florida to fund research on generic drugs, nutrition. One early test subject - Ivermectin. Florida has funding of over $120 million.

Dr. John Campbell



Fantastic news.

The true anti-science facade is crumbling, brick by brick.

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/cdc-recognizes-studies-supporting

This morning we were delighted to see that the CDC just issued a press release (Autism and Vaccines) acknowledging what our co-author, Andrew Wakefield has understood for almost thirty years.

• The claim "vaccines do not cause autism" is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.
• Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.
• HHS has launched a comprehensive assessment of the causes of autism, including investigations on plausible biologic mechanisms and potential causal links.

Wow

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/cdcs-autism-reversal-inside-the-collapse?utm_source=%2Finbox&utm_medium=reader2

On November 19, 2025, quietly and without ceremony, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its website and rewrote one of the most politically charged sentences in modern American medicine. A sentence that had been treated as gospel"Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism"was suddenly recast as something far more fragile. In the CDC's own words, the slogan "is not an evidencebased statement" because available studies "have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines contribute to the development of autism."
Yet the headline still sits atop the page. Not because the CDC stands behind it, but because a U.S. Senator demanded it stay. CDC states plainly that the headline remains only due to an agreement with the chair of the Senate HELP Committee. A mandated political slogan now presides over a scientific reversal.
The body of the page reads like a confession. It acknowledges that key infant vaccinesincluding HepB, DTaP, Hib, PCV13, IPV, rotavirus, and influenzahave never been studied for autism outcomes. It admits that earlier studies used to justify the categorical claim were incapable of ruling out causation. It concedes that mechanistic and associative findings were ignored by health authorities. And it promises, for the first time, an HHSled effort to conduct "goldstandard science" to evaluate whether earlylife vaccination can contribute to autism.
This moment did not arise in a vacuum. It is the final surface rupture of a 25year fault line running beneath CDC's public messaginga story of suppressed signals, discarded testimony, unpublished findings, internal dissent, FOIAreleased emails, whistleblower documents, and a lawsuit that forced CDC to walk back its own claim once before

New study: even a single dose of Ivermectin has positive results.

The War on Ivermection book author: "a high statistical improvement".

Suicidal that we are still allowing and even celebrating this gain of function research https://t.co/WhAnoj83JT

— Ryan Grim (@ryangrim) November 28, 2025

"450 peer reviewed"studies" "fundamentally harmful"
I wonder which of Bearister's infallible medical institutions will be the first to crack.

If you thought the COVID shots were bad enough, wait until you hear this presentation from epidemiologist @NicHulscher.

He dropped 6 minutes of damning COVID vaccine data on a Washington county health board, and the longer you listen, the worse it gets.

“A total of 450… pic.twitter.com/043oTmZIqB

— Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) December 1, 2025

The covid mRNA shots killed more children than they saved, according to new study. Stocks of vaccine companies fell ( Moderna -6%, BioNTech -4.3%, Novavax -4%, Vaxcyte -6.6%.) upon announcement of new study results.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/vaccine-stocks-drop-after-fda-memo-links-covid-shots-childrens-deaths

Quote:

---

Vaccine stocks slumped Monday after an explosive memo from FDA vaccine chief Vinay Prasad surfaced late Friday, signaling the agency is preparing to roll out tough restrictions on new vaccines for children. Prasad described a "profound revelation" linking Covid shots to at least ten deaths in children.

"This is a profound revelation," Prasad wrote in the memo. "For the first time, the US FDA will acknowledge that COVID-19 vaccines have killed American children."

He added, "It is horrifying to consider that the US vaccine regulation, including our actions, may have harmed more children than we saved. This requires humility and introspection."

---

We knew this would happen. The supposed unspoken legal thinking was that if children are also vaxxed, the drug companies can't be sued.

The odds of a parent reporting the death of a child following an mRNA vaccine are pretty low, especially if that death occurs several days or weeks after the event, which is the case in the majority of deaths.

I had a former colleague who was a very active, healthy slim woman in her mid-30s, avid biker and jogger, vegetarian, who was found dead from a brain aneurysm 48 hours after her first jab. Not only was she not reported, but none of her friends, relatives or coworkers dared make that connection.

I may have recounted here - friend of a friend 68, healthy, non smoker, non drug user, slim, no major medical issues, wife pushes him to get the jab... after he does, he collapses in the clinic, rushed to the hospital, Code Red or whatever in the ambulance, IVs, etc. Almost dies.

Some speculate the ultramarathon runner who died in the East Bay had the jab, but he foolishly was running when it was 107, no water, no running partner, little shade, no tracking app.

Nothing to see hear...move along

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/what-a-coincidence-or-is-it-just

"Just days after Prof Francis Boyle agreed to testify against Bill Gates & Albert Bourla over the deadly COVID mRNA shots...he was FOUND DEAD.
Boyle authored the US Bioweapons Act & called the mRNA injections 'Bioweapons & Franken-Shots.'"

WELCOME TO THE DUMBERICA!

THIS CDC PANEL IS NOW FILLED WITH TRUMP-RFK JR STOOGES.

Our vaxx testing appears suspect. Saw a video yesterday where 3 siblings went in for a childhood vaxx, two immediately reacted, the third three hours later. All essentially now vegetables.

There was no reason beyond profit and legal issues for children to get the Covid Clot Shot.

DiabloWags said:

---

WELCOME TO THE DUMBERICA!

THIS CDC PANEL IS NOW FILLED WITH TRUMP-RFK JR STOOGES.

---

It's not like those toddlers are going to engage in unprotected sex or get blood transfusions. Hep B is primarily an STD, if the mother doesn't have it there are no serious benefits to vaccinating toddlers, only costs in negative side effects.

I'll let Vice Chair of the ACIP who led the proceedings speak for himself. Since you're so convinced that this is a catastrophic decision, perhaps you could enlighten us on why he is wrong.

https://www.malone.news/p/kennedy-unchained

"As if that was not enough bad news, then the reconstituted, conflict-of-interest scrubbed Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (CDC ACIP) met at the end of the week, and in a pair of nuanced advisory recommendations, voted to end the recommendations (functionally mandates) for Hepatitis B birth dose vaccination of all US-born children at low risk for contracting the virus. Few, if any, of our "colleagues" in the press appear to be able to read English, think, and appreciate the nuances of the approved language. Fewer still seem capable of processing the impact of the second approved recommendation."
...
"The ACIP Working Group responsible for reviewing the data and evidence was not asked to address potential changes to the current birth dose (and anti-HBs immunoglobulin) administration policies for those mothers who are infected with Hepatitis B, nor for those (very rare) cases where the Hepatitis B infection status of the mother is unknown. Only for mothers who are documented to be Hepatitis B negative. Therefore, the current recommendations stand, and it is still recommended that babies born to HBV-positive mothers be vaccinated at birth and receive immunoglobulin, as well as vaccination. Because these babies are clearly at significant risk for developing Hepatitis B infection.
Those press reports that the ACIP voted to entirely stop the HepB vax birth dose are disinformation."

...
"Vote 2

This one seems to be completely overlooked in press coverage, but it also passed. Yet it is far more revolutionary and disruptive than Vote 1, which pretty much just aligns US policies with those of leading Northern European public health positions.
Vote 2 has wide-ranging implications because it establishes a precedent that "booster dose" decisions should be individualized, based on actual data about a child's prior immune responses. "

"Science!" lol

That does it folks. I am convinced. I am getting the Covid-19 Vaccine and moving to France!

Vive la France! pic.twitter.com/X3mN8dqWDi

— Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) December 5, 2025

Cal88 said:

---

It's not like those toddlers are going to engage in unprotected sex or get blood transfusions. Hep B is primarily an STD, if the mother doesn't have it there are no serious benefits to vaccinating toddlers, only costs in negative side effects.

---

WRONG.

FIRST OFF, THE HEP-B TEST CAN RETURN FALSE NEGATIVES.
MEANING THAT A MOTHER MAY RECEIVE A NEGATIVE RESULT WHEN IN FACT SHE HAS THE VIRUS.

BABIES AND CHILDREN CAN ALSO CATCH THE VIRUS THROUGH SALIVE OR MINOR CUTS, FROM A HOUSEHOLD MEMBER, CAREGIVER, OR OTHER CLOSE CONTACT WHO HAS THE VIRUS. IT CAN LAST ON A HOUSEHOLD SURFACE FOR UP TO A WEEK.

YOU'RE TERRIBLY MISINFORMED.

And how many vaccinations would be required to prevent one case of Hep B in these EXTREMELY RARE edge cases? I'm guessing hundreds of thousands. On the other side of the ledger, what is the risk of those vaccinations? Or are we just going to pretend without ANY DATA that all vaccines at any age in any quantity are "SAFE AND EFFECTIVE?"

Zippergate said:

---

And how many vaccinations would be required to prevent one case of Hep B in these EXTREMELY RARE edge cases? I'm guessing hundreds of thousands. On the other side of the ledger, what is the risk of those vaccinations? Or are we just going to pretend without ANY DATA that all vaccines at any age in any quantity are "SAFE AND EFFECTIVE?"

---

Right.

There is no rational thinking there, it's all emotions, see the allcaps. It's almost like a religious devotion.

sycasey said:

---

Why do we think the Hep-B vaccine is risky?

---

There are plenty of reasons. But you're asking the wrong question. This is a biologic that your peeps want injected into every single baby born in this country. The correct question is, what evidence do you have that it is safe for this use case? If you dig deep, I think you'll be shocked at the lack of evidence, at how this forced vaccination has been perpetuated for decades without it, and why day one vaccination was instituted in the first place.

Zippergate said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Why do we think the Hep-B vaccine is risky?

---

There are plenty of reasons. But you're asking the wrong question. This is a biologic that your peeps want injected into every single baby born in this country. The correct question is, what evidence do you have that it is safe for this use case? If you dig deep, I think you'll be shocked at the lack of evidence, at how this forced vaccination has been perpetuated for decades without it, and why day one vaccination was instituted in the first place.

---

I mean, when I do searches on this topic all I find are doctors (like the American Academy of Pediatrics) saying that pulling the vaccine recommendation is a bad decision. So maybe you need to show me what I'm not seeing.

Quote:

---

Why do we think the Hep-B vaccine is risky?

---

At the very least, because it has aluminum and formaldehyde, and those can cross the blood brain barrier which isn't fully formed in an infant, resulting in neurological damage. Also autoimmune responses.

sycasey said:

---

Zippergate said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Why do we think the Hep-B vaccine is risky?

---

There are plenty of reasons. But you're asking the wrong question. This is a biologic that your peeps want injected into every single baby born in this country. The correct question is, what evidence do you have that it is safe for this use case? If you dig deep, I think you'll be shocked at the lack of evidence, at how this forced vaccination has been perpetuated for decades without it, and why day one vaccination was instituted in the first place.

---

I mean, when I do searches on this topic all I find are doctors (like the American Academy of Pediatrics) saying that pulling the vaccine recommendation is a bad decision. So maybe you need to show me what I'm not seeing.

---

I'm sympathetic to that. A google search is going turn up page after page of propaganda. Safe and effective is dogma. It's built into every algorithm. But ask yourself, am I hearing the other side?

Like from these doctors and scientists:

https://substack.com/home/post/p-180638571

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/a-terribly-frustrated-acip-meeting

https://substack.com/@tobyrogers/note/c-184272388?utmSource=%2Fsearch%2FThe%2520clinical%2520trials%2520for%2520Recombivax%2520and%2520Engerix%253A

Hear it from a parent advocate:

https://substack.com/home/post/p-180925597

There's a reason MAHA has ascended. It's because the American people are quite literally sick. Chronic illness is rampant despite by far the highest health spending in the world. Why can't the AAP do anything about it or even tell us why?