The Official Russian Invasion of Ukraine Thread

939,384 Views | 10272 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by Cal88
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Also, on the economic front:



Part of this phenomenon is that a lot of high net worth Russians actually repatriated their wealth, as their assets have been arbitrarily seized in Europe, with many Russian citizens also getting debanked. This is another instance of the sanctions backfiring.

Russia overtakes Germany to become fifth biggest economy in the world in GDP on a PPP basis
https://intellinews.com/russia-overtakes-germany-to-become-fifth-biggest-economy-in-the-world-in-gdp-on-a-ppp-basis-286944/?source=russia

German industry is reeling, as a result of the Russian sanctions, coupled with the US bombing of Nordstream. Automobile production is down across Europe.

https://www.sneci.com/blog/the-european-automotive-market-in-free-fall-since-the-beginning-of-2022/

Biden Crime Family
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Zippergate said:

https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-russia-war-latest-12541713

"Ukraine war latest: Kyiv slams NATO official's 'absolutely unacceptable' suggestion of giving up land for membership

Ukraine could agree to give up some of its territory occupied by Russia to secure the peace it needs to join NATO, according to an alliance official - a suggestion Kyiv has branded "ridiculous"."


Yet more confirmation that NATO knows Ukraine can't win. Would be heart breaking for Ukraine to lose the territories that it already agreed to give self-determination to and suffer utter devastation while their NATO "friends" achieve their objectives of weakening Russia and moving the NATO line eastward. With friends like these who needs enemies.

I thought Ukraine was an unwitting pawn to NATO's plan to go to war with Russia? Or do they have their own agency and goals?

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Zippergate said:

https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-russia-war-latest-12541713

"Ukraine war latest: Kyiv slams NATO official's 'absolutely unacceptable' suggestion of giving up land for membership

Ukraine could agree to give up some of its territory occupied by Russia to secure the peace it needs to join NATO, according to an alliance official - a suggestion Kyiv has branded "ridiculous"."


Yet more confirmation that NATO knows Ukraine can't win. Would be heart breaking for Ukraine to lose the territories that it already agreed to give self-determination to and suffer utter devastation while their NATO "friends" achieve their objectives of weakening Russia and moving the NATO line eastward. With friends like these who needs enemies.

I thought Ukraine was an unwitting pawn to NATO's plan to go to war with Russia? Or do they have their own agency and goals?


The U.S. pro-war position may have changed because of the failed counteroffensive. While Zelensky, not wanting to lose and be wrong, is loudly demanding more and better weapons, the US may be sobered by the sheer amount of troops and equipment lost with few kilometers gained.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Congressional Ukraine Caucus Co-Chair Says War May Not Be 'Winnable'

Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD), a co-chair of the congressional Ukraine Caucus, said this week that he's not sure if the Ukraine war is "winnable" and called for the US to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to pursue peace talks.

Harris is also a member of the Freedom Caucus, which has many members who have opposed US support for Ukraine. But Harris has been a staunch supporter of the proxy war against Russia throughout the conflict.

"Is this more a stalemate? Should we be realistic about it? I think we probably should," Harris said at a town hall on Tuesday night, according to POLITICO. Discussing the Ukrainian counteroffensive, Harris said, "I'll be blunt, it's failed."

"I'm not sure it's winnable anymore," Harris added. His comments are a sign that the new $24 billion in spending on the Ukraine war that the White House has asked Congress to approve won't receive as much support as previous packages.

When asked if he would support another tranche of spending on the war, Harris said, "If there is humanitarian monies, nonmilitary monies, or military monies without an inspector general, I'm not supporting it." President Biden's request includes economic and humanitarian assistance and no additional oversight for military aid.

"I think the time has come to realistically call for peace talks. I know President Zelensky doesn't want it," Harris said. "But President Zelensky, without our help, he would abjectly lose the war. And with our help, he's not winning. It's a stalemate now."

Chief among his reasons for not supporting more spending on the Ukraine war was the cost. But Harris also cautioned against bringing Ukraine into NATO and starting "World War III." Harris is in a position to influence spending as he is a member of the House Appropriations Committee.
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If this is true and it plays out the way he's predicting, this is the biggest "L" in American history.
1. Reaching the same outcome that could have been achieved diplomatically but with massive destruction and loss of life there
2. Sending Russia into the arms of our real strategic threat, the CCP.
3. Worsening relations with China which is apparently gearing up for war over Taiwan. The Ukraine conflict, which has heightened tensions and exposed our utter ineptitude, surely has helped matters.
4. Loss of credibility and prestige as major nations like India say no and ignore US sanctions on Russia
5. Huge hit to the US dollar as countries all over the world realize that their dollar reserves are only safe as long as global bully, the US, says so. The anti-dollar movement is just getting started.
6. More than $100 billion wasted. How much of that was siphoned off to corrupt oligarchs?
7. Severe economic damage from the inflation of the past year, sparked in part by the surge in energy prices.
8. Draining of the strategic oil reserve to suppress oil prices. Strained relations with Saudi Arabia because of this.
9. Implosion of European manufacturing as nat gas prices surged to insane levels due to the cutoff of Russian gas. Bombing the pipelines serving our allies is ballsy move that may have blowback as economic conditions there deteriorate.
10. The rebuild of Ukraine. Who is going to pay for that? Does the country descend into political chaos? It better not for the millions worldwide who depend on Ukraine for food, fertilizer, etc.

I'm sure others could add to this list. It's a clusterf*ck. And it was all preventable.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

movielover said:

I only listened to part of it so far, but this shows how corrupt the Democrats and UniParty are.

THEY WON'T GIVE RFK Jr. a SECRET SERVICE DETAIL!!!

First time in history that request has been turned down.
Do they give any candidate that asks a Secret Service Detail? There were over 1200 registered Presidential candidates in 2020. That calls for a lot of agents.


With his poll numbers and support, yes. 100% of the time.

They also have numerous threats daily, and an intruder made it to the second floor of his home.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

If this is true and it plays out the way he's predicting, this is the biggest "L" in American history.
1. Reaching the same outcome that could have been achieved diplomatically but with massive destruction and loss of life there
2. Sending Russia into the arms of our real strategic threat, the CCP.
3. Worsening relations with China which is apparently gearing up for war over Taiwan. The Ukraine conflict, which has heightened tensions and exposed our utter ineptitude, surely has helped matters.
4. Loss of credibility and prestige as major nations like India say no and ignore US sanctions on Russia
5. Huge hit to the US dollar as countries all over the world realize that their dollar reserves are only safe as long as global bully, the US, says so. The anti-dollar movement is just getting started.
6. More than $100 billion wasted. How much of that was siphoned off to corrupt oligarchs?
7. Severe economic damage from the inflation of the past year, sparked in part by the surge in energy prices.
8. Draining of the strategic oil reserve to suppress oil prices. Strained relations with Saudi Arabia because of this.
9. Implosion of European manufacturing as nat gas prices surged to insane levels due to the cutoff of Russian gas. Bombing the pipelines serving our allies is ballsy move that may have blowback as economic conditions there deteriorate.
10. The rebuild of Ukraine. Who is going to pay for that? Does the country descend into political chaos? It better not for the millions worldwide who depend on Ukraine for food, fertilizer, etc.

I'm sure others could add to this list. It's a clusterf*ck. And it was all preventable.


I somehow have to think that "the biggest 'L' in American history" would be one of the ones that cost a bunch of American lives, instead of, basically, none.


While I don't totally disagree with your 10 points, from a "real politik" perspective, this war has given us...

+ a fresh sense of what works and what doesn't in 21st century warfare (help us spend our next few trillion wisely)
+ a good look at the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian military
+ a good draining of the Russian economy
+ a shot at destabilizing Putin (if not successful, well, we learned something there, too)
+ an opportunity to redefine our "vital interests" for next time
+ a message to China telling them Taiwan wouldn't be a walk in the park

All without having to put American boots on enemy soil!

Okay, I am being a tiny bit facetious, because what about a war-torn Ukraine and all the Ukranian lives lost? Heck, what about the Russian lives lost (I read somewhere on the Internet that they are people, too)? Well, I am hoping that the Ukrainians wanted to put up a fight and that, without us, it would've been worse.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

Okay, I am being a tiny bit facetious, because what about a war-torn Ukraine and all the Ukranian lives lost? Heck, what about the Russian lives lost (I read somewhere on the Internet that they are people, too)? Well, I am hoping that the Ukrainians wanted to put up a fight and that, without us, it would've been worse.

Afghanistan should have taught us that if a foreign army doesn't want to fight, we can't make them. Ukraine wanted to fight.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A lot happening lately, as we all knew. Moscow shut down its airports and evacuated some places last night because of the threat of a drone strike. The US approved the sending of F-16s from Denmark and the Netherlands. The slow-playing of defense support from the US and the UK is prolonging this dumb war. It should be clear by now that there is nothing we could do to escalate Putin's response, apart from sending in NATO troops I suppose.

It's become more and more clear that the cluster munitions we sent over have been making a difference. Just ask Russians.



We are seeing increasing criticism of Russia's miliary from prominent milbloggers which means that Igor Girkin won't be the only one who ends up jailed (or defenestated). Another prominent recent example of this criticism.

For anyone interested in a high level overview of what Ukraine has been trying to do lately, check this thread:


For anyone who is genuinely concerned about the threat of BRICS creating their own currency (lol), the guy who coined the term farts in their general direction:

Quote:

The former Goldman Sachs economist who coined the Brics acronym has dismissed as "ridiculous" the notion that the group of emerging nations might develop its own currency, as Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa prepare to discuss whether to expand the bloc.

"It's just ridiculous," he said in response to calls for a "trading currency" from Brazilian president Luiz Incio Lula da Silva and other politicians from the bloc. "They're going to create a Brics central bank? How would you do that? It's embarrassing almost."
I see a lot of fake pronouncements about Russia getting stronger, but no one really believes that. They wouldn't be begging North Korea for munitions if they were:


This is a fairly detailed take from Newsweek about Russian losses from this dumb war. Obviously the shills like Macdoofus have their own made up numbers that will differ tremendously. You can either believe Macdoofus that Russia has performed addition by subtraction and that Ukraine has lost 350 million soldiers or you can look at other sources. Just by way of example, Russia purportedly had around 110 of their new fancy KA-52 attack helicopters. They lost a couple more a few nights ago which brings the total to 40 lost in this war, more than a third of what they had. Does that make them stronger?

Or maybe the Rubel falling 20%+ against the dollar and the Yuan makes them stronger? Or the fact that they begged China for a no limits friendship to which China said hell no. You can go on and on with how this war has made Russia worse off. The US hasn't lost a single soldier and the vast majority of the aid we sent over was in obsolete munitions that were taking up space in our storage facilities. Even at the inflated dollar thrown about, we're talking about like 3% of our military spend.


Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

Zippergate said:

If this is true and it plays out the way he's predicting, this is the biggest "L" in American history.
1. Reaching the same outcome that could have been achieved diplomatically but with massive destruction and loss of life there
2. Sending Russia into the arms of our real strategic threat, the CCP.
3. Worsening relations with China which is apparently gearing up for war over Taiwan. The Ukraine conflict, which has heightened tensions and exposed our utter ineptitude, surely has helped matters.
4. Loss of credibility and prestige as major nations like India say no and ignore US sanctions on Russia
5. Huge hit to the US dollar as countries all over the world realize that their dollar reserves are only safe as long as global bully, the US, says so. The anti-dollar movement is just getting started.
6. More than $100 billion wasted. How much of that was siphoned off to corrupt oligarchs?
7. Severe economic damage from the inflation of the past year, sparked in part by the surge in energy prices.
8. Draining of the strategic oil reserve to suppress oil prices. Strained relations with Saudi Arabia because of this.
9. Implosion of European manufacturing as nat gas prices surged to insane levels due to the cutoff of Russian gas. Bombing the pipelines serving our allies is ballsy move that may have blowback as economic conditions there deteriorate.
10. The rebuild of Ukraine. Who is going to pay for that? Does the country descend into political chaos? It better not for the millions worldwide who depend on Ukraine for food, fertilizer, etc.

I'm sure others could add to this list. It's a clusterf*ck. And it was all preventable.


I somehow have to think that "the biggest 'L' in American history" would be one of the ones that cost a bunch of American lives, instead of, basically, none.


While I don't totally disagree with your 10 points, from a "real politik" perspective, this war has given us...

+ a fresh sense of what works and what doesn't in 21st century warfare
+ a good look at the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian military
+ a good draining of the Russian economy
+ a shot at destabilizing Putin (if not successful, well, we learned something there, too)
+ an opportunity to redefine our "vital interests" for next time
+ a message to China telling them Taiwan wouldn't be a walk in the park

All without having to put American boots on enemy soil!

Okay, I am being a tiny bit facetious, because what about a war-torn Ukraine and all the Ukranian lives lost? Heck, what about the Russian lives lost (I read somewhere on the Internet that they are people, too)? Well, I am hoping that the Ukrainians wanted to put up a fight and that, without us, it would've been worse.

Without us, there would have been no war in the first place, Ukraine would have had no choice but to abide by the Minsk Agreements, or at the very least, signed the Istanbul peace plan at the start of the war back in March '22, sparing the lives of hundreds of thousands, and keeping Ukraine together as the largest nation in Europe.

The Russian military is much stronger now. Last year I gave Russia a 65% chance of winning the war (and 30% for a stalemate, 5% chance of a Ukrainian "upset").

Since then, they have made huge strides across the board in many critical aspects of military hardware (including new drones, electronic warfare, high-precision glide bombs etc), have used sound tactics and strategy (Surovikin's defensive lines, which have held up remarkably well) and shown prowess in combat. Right now it looks more like 90% chance of a Russian win, they are getting closer to exhausting Ukrainian reserves and morale. We could see them restart large maneuvers and advances as early as this winter.

The Russian economy has not been drained. Russia is the richest country in the world in terms of natural resources, by a wide margin, and it turns out their economy and monetary policy are fairly well run. Russian capital invested abroad has come back home, domestic industrial production is rising, as western imports get replaced, and Russian agriculture is booming.



The gambit of using Ukraine to bleed Russia has failed, Ukraine being the main victim, with Europe taking a lot of collateral damage. Ukraine's future as a country is now uncertain.

Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
^This is what they really mean when they say that Ukraine has become "casualty averse", a mobilization process that is completely out of control:



Most of the gung-ho Ukrainian nationalists are already dead or wounded. There is a reserve held back in the capital, and in the main russophone cities - Kharkov, Odessa, Dnipro, in order to keep the regime afloat in expectation of blowback from the mounting losses.

Ukraine now has between 40,000 and 50,000 veterans who have lost a limb, this points to the estimates of 300,000+ KIAs being correct.
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

Zippergate said:

If this is true and it plays out the way he's predicting, this is the biggest "L" in American history.
1. Reaching the same outcome that could have been achieved diplomatically but with massive destruction and loss of life there
2. Sending Russia into the arms of our real strategic threat, the CCP.
3. Worsening relations with China which is apparently gearing up for war over Taiwan. The Ukraine conflict, which has heightened tensions and exposed our utter ineptitude, surely has helped matters.
4. Loss of credibility and prestige as major nations like India say no and ignore US sanctions on Russia
5. Huge hit to the US dollar as countries all over the world realize that their dollar reserves are only safe as long as global bully, the US, says so. The anti-dollar movement is just getting started.
6. More than $100 billion wasted. How much of that was siphoned off to corrupt oligarchs?
7. Severe economic damage from the inflation of the past year, sparked in part by the surge in energy prices.
8. Draining of the strategic oil reserve to suppress oil prices. Strained relations with Saudi Arabia because of this.
9. Implosion of European manufacturing as nat gas prices surged to insane levels due to the cutoff of Russian gas. Bombing the pipelines serving our allies is ballsy move that may have blowback as economic conditions there deteriorate.
10. The rebuild of Ukraine. Who is going to pay for that? Does the country descend into political chaos? It better not for the millions worldwide who depend on Ukraine for food, fertilizer, etc.

I'm sure others could add to this list. It's a clusterf*ck. And it was all preventable.


I somehow have to think that "the biggest 'L' in American history" would be one of the ones that cost a bunch of American lives, instead of, basically, none.


While I don't totally disagree with your 10 points, from a "real politik" perspective, this war has given us...

+ a fresh sense of what works and what doesn't in 21st century warfare
+ a good look at the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian military
+ a good draining of the Russian economy
+ a shot at destabilizing Putin (if not successful, well, we learned something there, too)
+ an opportunity to redefine our "vital interests" for next time
+ a message to China telling them Taiwan wouldn't be a walk in the park

All without having to put American boots on enemy soil!

Okay, I am being a tiny bit facetious, because what about a war-torn Ukraine and all the Ukranian lives lost? Heck, what about the Russian lives lost (I read somewhere on the Internet that they are people, too)? Well, I am hoping that the Ukrainians wanted to put up a fight and that, without us, it would've been worse.
Your first two positives are of marginal value imo. If you're going to count that, be sure to include the cost of alienating much of the world and reinforcing America's image as world bully.

Destabilizing Putin? Perhaps, but he's more popular than ever thanks to this war.

"Vital interests"? I thought this was about protecting democracy and stopping aggression. If the "vital interest" you speak of was crippling Russia, I don't think many Americans are on board with that if they ever were.

Lastly, and most importantly, what's with this obsession of continually demonizing Russia? Thankfully, we didn't do that with Germany the second time around (lesson learned) or Japan and that has been a huge success. Russia has a messy, fledgling democracy, something you'd think we would want to encourage. They are a regional power and nowhere near the threat that CCP-led China is with its aim to supplant the US as world hegemon. China needs to import massive amounts of energy, food etc to support over a billion people, and they have been conducting a multi-front war against the US economically, politically, electronically, destabilizing the US with illegal drugs, spying, steeling IP, buying influence and interfering in US affairs by essentially bribing key people in the corporate sector, government, at universities and in the press while reducing US influence all over the world. In light of this, and given the fact that Russia is the world's largest supplier of many of the things China needs, you'd think we would have the sense to lay aside our personal prejudices and recent history to draw Russia in rather than push it towards China which is what the neocons have done.

I'm no Russophile and certainly have a problem with their support of the mullahs in Iran, for example. All the more reason to bring them into the fold. Germany under Merkel certainly viewed them as a long-term partner. Why couldn't we? Obviously that ship has sailed, certainly for our lifetimes. It was a missed opportunity and it has led to political and humanitarian crisis that will plague Europe for a long time. And it's all because of delusional, self-important neocons and empire-building NATO bureaucrats.

Consider this article. The fact that Putin wanted to join NATO, wanted to be integrated in Europe, belies the notion that Russia was always hellbent on recreating the Soviet Union and restarting the Cold War.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/04/ex-nato-head-says-putin-wanted-to-join-alliance-early-on-in-his-rule
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The gap between U2S' content and reality has been pretty wide, but with this last post above, it is taking on a whole new dimension:

Delusional Brit's MS Paint/crayon assessment of current or future Ukrainian front progress:


vs. reality, from a pro-Ukraine neocon outlet - you really have to zoom in on the light blue areas showing Ukrainian advances, and even those are quite generous:


45,000 Ukrainian soldiers lost for these tiny patches of light blue advances into the no-man's land greyzone...

This Mike Martin chap is also lying about the level of Russian reserves, they have over 250,000 soldiers held back in anticipation of bigger cracks in the Ukrainian dam later this year. as the Ukrainian ammo and personnel shortage gets worse, it is the Ukrainians that have had to shuttle their reserves between fronts, not the other way around, they have been trying to shore up the northern front esp around Kupyansk, where their positions have been crumbling:









movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, Zelensky agreed to a peace deal and we told him NO via Boris Johnson. Probably kicked him $$$ on the backside, too.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Destroying a country wasn't worth it. 400K dead Ukrainians, 10 Million fled who will never return. Russia now arguably has the strongest military today.

Another Blinken / Biden disaster.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Big C said:

Okay, I am being a tiny bit facetious, because what about a war-torn Ukraine and all the Ukranian lives lost? Heck, what about the Russian lives lost (I read somewhere on the Internet that they are people, too)? Well, I am hoping that the Ukrainians wanted to put up a fight and that, without us, it would've been worse.

Afghanistan should have taught us that if a foreign army doesn't want to fight, we can't make them. Ukraine wanted to fight.

Ideally, Vietnam should have taught us that if a foreign army doesn't want to fight, we can't make them, but it's hard to retain the lessons from history when we have such a short attention span.

Agree about Ukraine, just hope we haven't been egging them on too much.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Big C said:

Zippergate said:

If this is true and it plays out the way he's predicting, this is the biggest "L" in American history.
1. Reaching the same outcome that could have been achieved diplomatically but with massive destruction and loss of life there
2. Sending Russia into the arms of our real strategic threat, the CCP.
3. Worsening relations with China which is apparently gearing up for war over Taiwan. The Ukraine conflict, which has heightened tensions and exposed our utter ineptitude, surely has helped matters.
4. Loss of credibility and prestige as major nations like India say no and ignore US sanctions on Russia
5. Huge hit to the US dollar as countries all over the world realize that their dollar reserves are only safe as long as global bully, the US, says so. The anti-dollar movement is just getting started.
6. More than $100 billion wasted. How much of that was siphoned off to corrupt oligarchs?
7. Severe economic damage from the inflation of the past year, sparked in part by the surge in energy prices.
8. Draining of the strategic oil reserve to suppress oil prices. Strained relations with Saudi Arabia because of this.
9. Implosion of European manufacturing as nat gas prices surged to insane levels due to the cutoff of Russian gas. Bombing the pipelines serving our allies is ballsy move that may have blowback as economic conditions there deteriorate.
10. The rebuild of Ukraine. Who is going to pay for that? Does the country descend into political chaos? It better not for the millions worldwide who depend on Ukraine for food, fertilizer, etc.

I'm sure others could add to this list. It's a clusterf*ck. And it was all preventable.


I somehow have to think that "the biggest 'L' in American history" would be one of the ones that cost a bunch of American lives, instead of, basically, none.


While I don't totally disagree with your 10 points, from a "real politik" perspective, this war has given us...

+ a fresh sense of what works and what doesn't in 21st century warfare
+ a good look at the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian military
+ a good draining of the Russian economy
+ a shot at destabilizing Putin (if not successful, well, we learned something there, too)
+ an opportunity to redefine our "vital interests" for next time
+ a message to China telling them Taiwan wouldn't be a walk in the park

All without having to put American boots on enemy soil!

Okay, I am being a tiny bit facetious, because what about a war-torn Ukraine and all the Ukranian lives lost? Heck, what about the Russian lives lost (I read somewhere on the Internet that they are people, too)? Well, I am hoping that the Ukrainians wanted to put up a fight and that, without us, it would've been worse.

Without us, there would have been no war in the first place, Ukraine would have had no choice but to abide by the Minsk Agreements, or at the very least, signed the Istanbul peace plan at the start of the war back in March '22, sparing the lives of hundreds of thousands, and keeping Ukraine together as the largest nation in Europe.

The Russian military is much stronger now. Last year I gave Russia a 65% chance of winning the war (and 30% for a stalemate, 5% chance of a Ukrainian "upset").

Since then, they have made huge strides across the board in many critical aspects of military hardware (including new drones, electronic warfare, high-precision glide bombs etc), have used sound tactics and strategy (Surovikin's defensive lines, which have held up remarkably well) and shown prowess in combat. Right now it looks more like 90% chance of a Russian win, they are getting closer to exhausting Ukrainian reserves and morale. We could see them restart large maneuvers and advances as early as this winter.

The Russian economy has not been drained. Russia is the richest country in the world in terms of natural resources, by a wide margin, and it turns out their economy and monetary policy are fairly well run. Russian capital invested abroad has come back home, domestic industrial production is rising, as western imports get replaced, and Russian agriculture is booming.



The gambit of using Ukraine to bleed Russia has failed, Ukraine being the main victim, with Europe taking a lot of collateral damage. Ukraine's future as a country is now uncertain.



Did you read the part where I said I was being a tiny bit facetious? This war has been a terrible thing for that region -- mass death and destruction -- while our biggest worry is whether transgender women should be allowed to play women's sports, so we spend all day tweeting about it.

Still, I largely disagree with most of your points:

- The Russian military is not stronger as a result of the last 1 1/2 years; it is weaker. That is how it works. Yes, they modified some of their absurd strategies and tactics from 2022, but no matter how much artillery they do have, it is not an endless supply... and much of it is now buried in Ukrainian soil.

- Of course their economy is being drained. Again, that is how it works. You spend a trillion or two on guns, that is money that could've been spent on butter. They have a lot of natural resources? Yeah, so does Rwanda. Get back to me when they don't have to get their drones from Iran.

Agree: "The gambit of using Ukraine to bleed Russia has failed" (if that was a gambit we were actually playing). I was hoping we would eventually stop calling plays from the Neocon Playbook
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

sycasey said:

Big C said:

Okay, I am being a tiny bit facetious, because what about a war-torn Ukraine and all the Ukranian lives lost? Heck, what about the Russian lives lost (I read somewhere on the Internet that they are people, too)? Well, I am hoping that the Ukrainians wanted to put up a fight and that, without us, it would've been worse.

Afghanistan should have taught us that if a foreign army doesn't want to fight, we can't make them. Ukraine wanted to fight.

Ideally, Vietnam should have taught us that if a foreign army doesn't want to fight, we can't make them, but it's hard to retain the lessons from history when we have such a short attention span.

Agree about Ukraine, just hope we haven't been egging them on too much.

Agreed! Just as Russia should have learned from Afghanistan that invading a country of this size is foolhardy, but yet the same mistakes are made.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?


*Russia was a major patron
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Big C said:

sycasey said:

Big C said:

Okay, I am being a tiny bit facetious, because what about a war-torn Ukraine and all the Ukranian lives lost? Heck, what about the Russian lives lost (I read somewhere on the Internet that they are people, too)? Well, I am hoping that the Ukrainians wanted to put up a fight and that, without us, it would've been worse.

Afghanistan should have taught us that if a foreign army doesn't want to fight, we can't make them. Ukraine wanted to fight.

Ideally, Vietnam should have taught us that if a foreign army doesn't want to fight, we can't make them, but it's hard to retain the lessons from history when we have such a short attention span.

Agree about Ukraine, just hope we haven't been egging them on too much.

Agreed! Just as Russia should have learned from Afghanistan that invading a country of this size is foolhardy, but yet the same mistakes are made.


A soon to be defenestrated or tea poisoned prominent Russian military leader believes Russia can't win the war they are fighting. He acknowledges the issues they are facing and the havoc it's wreaking on Russia. So there are people in the military who see the parallels and the only question is whether and when that bubbles up to Putin. Or I suppose the extent to which he cares. The entire article isn't too long and I suggest reading, but here are some combined excerpts.

Prepare for a blitz propaganda response about woke nazis, NATO or other irrelevant lies. Perhaps they will continue to pretend that Russian Kinshals are unstoppable despite the fact that they have been proven to be a massive failure. Which I suppose is why their creators have been imprisoned. But Russia is doing great and this is what a successful 3 day war looks like. Russia is stronger than ever! Maybe Hunter Biden or Ron Desantis can hire the same propagandists to pretend everything is going to plan and they are doing better than ever.



Quote:



The Russian commander of the "Vostok" Battalion fighting in southern Ukraine said on Thursday that Ukraine will not be defeated and suggested that Russia freeze the war along current frontlines.

Alexander Khodakovsky made the candid concession yesterday on his Telegram channel after Russian forces, including his own troops, were devastatingly defeated by Ukrainian marines earlier this week at Urozhaine in the Zaporizhzhia-Donetsk regional border area.

"Can we bring down Ukraine militarily? Now and in the near future, no," Khodakovsky, a former official of the so-called Donetsk People's Republic, said yesterday.

"When I talk to myself about our destiny in this war, I mean that we will not crawl forward, like the [Ukrainians], turning everything into [destroyed] Bakhmuts in our path. And, I do not foresee the easy occupation of cities," he said.

Khodakovsky may be reintroducing the narrative into the Russian information space on behalf of the faction allegedly interested in freezing the war, although Khodakovsky likely has limited influence on the Russian leadership itself," ISW said.

At a practical level, ISW further believes that Khodakovsky's comments reveal that recent Ukrainian advances may be significantly weakening confidence in the Russian defense along the wider front in southern Ukraine.

Khodakovsky has previously highlighted concerns about the Russian defense in the Donetsk-Zaporizhzhia regional border area, specifically relating to poor Russian counterbattery capabilities, heavy Russian losses, exhausted Russian forces, and a lack of reserves, ISW noted, and that he has previously called for an operational pause so that Russian forces could reinforce for future operations.

"Khodakovsky's escalation from calling for an operational pause to suggesting that Russia freeze the conflict is likely associated with his firsthand experience of recent tactically significant Ukrainian advances and the degradation of defending Russian forces in Urozhaine," ISW said.

Urozhaine is the 10th village and southern most point taken by the Armed Forces of Ukraine since the beginning of the summer offensive in early June.

Khodakovsky is a former commander of Ukraine's Alpha special unit of the Security Service of Ukraine.


bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 542 | Russia-Ukraine war News | Al Jazeera


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/8/19/russia-ukraine-war-list-of-key-events-day-542
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

sycasey said:




Agreed! Just as Russia should have learned from Afghanistan that invading a country of this size is foolhardy, but yet the same mistakes are made.


A soon to be defenestrated or tea poisoned prominent Russian military leader believes Russia can't win the war they are fighting. He acknowledges the issues they are facing and the havoc it's wreaking on Russia. So there are people in the military who see the parallels and the only question is whether and when that bubbles up to Putin. Or I suppose the extent to which he cares. The entire article isn't too long and I suggest reading, but here are some combined excerpts.

Prepare for a blitz propaganda response about woke nazis, NATO or other irrelevant lies. Perhaps they will continue to pretend that Russian Kinshals are unstoppable despite the fact that they have been proven to be a massive failure. Which I suppose is why their creators have been imprisoned. But Russia is doing great and this is what a successful 3 day war looks like. Russia is stronger than ever! Maybe Hunter Biden or Ron Desantis can hire the same propagandists to pretend everything is going to plan and they are doing better than ever.



Quote:



The Russian commander of the "Vostok" Battalion fighting in southern Ukraine said on Thursday that Ukraine will not be defeated and suggested that Russia freeze the war along current frontlines.

Alexander Khodakovsky made the candid concession yesterday on his Telegram channel after Russian forces, including his own troops, were devastatingly defeated by Ukrainian marines earlier this week at Urozhaine in the Zaporizhzhia-Donetsk regional border area.

"Can we bring down Ukraine militarily? Now and in the near future, no," Khodakovsky, a former official of the so-called Donetsk People's Republic, said yesterday.

"When I talk to myself about our destiny in this war, I mean that we will not crawl forward, like the [Ukrainians], turning everything into [destroyed] Bakhmuts in our path. And, I do not foresee the easy occupation of cities," he said.

Khodakovsky may be reintroducing the narrative into the Russian information space on behalf of the faction allegedly interested in freezing the war, although Khodakovsky likely has limited influence on the Russian leadership itself," ISW said.

At a practical level, ISW further believes that Khodakovsky's comments reveal that recent Ukrainian advances may be significantly weakening confidence in the Russian defense along the wider front in southern Ukraine.

Khodakovsky has previously highlighted concerns about the Russian defense in the Donetsk-Zaporizhzhia regional border area, specifically relating to poor Russian counterbattery capabilities, heavy Russian losses, exhausted Russian forces, and a lack of reserves, ISW noted, and that he has previously called for an operational pause so that Russian forces could reinforce for future operations.

"Khodakovsky's escalation from calling for an operational pause to suggesting that Russia freeze the conflict is likely associated with his firsthand experience of recent tactically significant Ukrainian advances and the degradation of defending Russian forces in Urozhaine," ISW said.

Urozhaine is the 10th village and southern most point taken by the Armed Forces of Ukraine since the beginning of the summer offensive in early June.

Khodakovsky is a former commander of Ukraine's Alpha special unit of the Security Service of Ukraine.



This report is from the ISW, based on an article published in the Kyiv Independent, which is a NATO-funded and strictly NATO-aligned online outlet published out of Amsterdam. I have some serious doubts as to the veracity of the statements they've attributed to Khodakovsky.

There might be some daylight between military leaders of the DPR like him and the Russian military administration, as the former bear a lot of resentment towards Russia for not having supported them more actively throughout the Donbass civil war in 2014-2021, as well as through the early stages of the war last year, where the already war-torn DPR bore a disproportional weight of the fighting. Former DPR leader Strelkov in particular was very vocal about his resentment, so much so that it got him arrested last month.

This being said, there are no credible statements from members of the official Russian military raising the white flag. Since Fall, Russia has been consistently winning, in Bakhmut, on the northern front in Kupyansk, and also in the south, neutralizing Ukraine's counteroffensive and inflicting heavy damage on them in the process, of the order of 45,000 KIAs in the last 10 weeks alone. The village that Ukraine has just taken, Urozhaine, is located a couple of kms inside the greyzone,

Ukraine has now thrown its reserves into its push south, including some of their best remaining troops, they need some kind of positive result by Thursday, which is Ukraine's independence day. They will probably get the next village on the chain, but they are vey unlikely to make a strategically significant advance towards Melitopol or Tokmak affecting Russia's control of the Crimean land bridge, which is the main goal of Ukraine's counteroffensive.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL after all the hype, Russia's Luna-25 crashed into the moon. Sorry, it has "ceased to exist as a result of a collision." Pretty consistent with everything else they do - products of a corrupt kleptocracy that are destined to fail. See overhyped but easily defended Kinzhale missiles for another recent example. I'm sure someone will go to jail for this, unless they happen to fall out of a window first or drink polonium tea.

Zelensky announced they're getting 60+ F-16s from Denmark and the Netherlands. Let's hope it's not too late.

We should be much faster at greenlighting support - we could have given them ATACMS and F-16s last year. We've spent something like 3% of our military budget arming Ukraine to significantly weaken Russia's military but doing it this slowly is just leading to more deaths (on both sides) and it doesn't appear to have any impact on Putin's "escalation." His attacks on civilians seems unrelated to whatever support the US is providing. Given that

Russia desperately needs this war to end, despite all of the talk about winning a war of attrition. Russia is losing far more equipment than they can hope to replenish and will be weaker for many years while they attempt to re-arm in the face of sanctions. Not to mention the pushback from Russian citizens when they finally see through the firehose of falsehoods to understand how much damage this dumb war has done to their fellow citizens, their economy, Ukraine and the rest of the world. Russia is making our failure in Vietnam look like a walk in the park.



oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

LOL after all the hype, Russia's Luna-25 crashed into the moon. Sorry, it has "ceased to exist as a result of a collision." Pretty consistent with everything else they do - products of a corrupt kleptocracy that are destined to fail. See overhyped but easily defended Kinzhale missiles for another recent example. I'm sure someone will go to jail for this, unless they happen to fall out of a window first or drink polonium tea.

Zelensky announced they're getting 60+ F-16s from Denmark and the Netherlands. Let's hope it's not too late.

We should be much faster at greenlighting support - we could have given them ATACMS and F-16s last year. We've spent something like 3% of our military budget arming Ukraine to significantly weaken Russia's military but doing it this slowly is just leading to more deaths (on both sides) and it doesn't appear to have any impact on Putin's "escalation." His attacks on civilians seems unrelated to whatever support the US is providing. Given that

Russia desperately needs this war to end, despite all of the talk about winning a war of attrition. Russia is losing far more equipment than they can hope to replenish and will be weaker for many years while they attempt to re-arm in the face of sanctions. Not to mention the pushback from Russian citizens when they finally see through the firehose of falsehoods to understand how much damage this dumb war has done to their fellow citizens, their economy, Ukraine and the rest of the world. Russia is making our failure in Vietnam look like a walk in the park.




For the past six months, you've constantly ridiculed folks and claimed that Ukraine was winning. Now, you have resorted to the following:
1) Bashing Russia for a space mission;
2) And pleading for more US money to Ukraine by saying they are only providing 3% of the U.S. global military budget to Ukraine, while in reality it is closer to 10% (75 billion vs 800 billion).

Why would you need to bash a failed space mission and plead for more US. money to Ukraine if the war was going so poorly for Russia?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Business Insider: Ukraine lacks the drone capacity to strike enough targets in Russia to erode its 'will to fight,' retired US colonel says

https://www.businessinsider.com/ukraine-lacks-drone-capacity-conduct-significant-strikes-russia-2023-8

"Ukraine can only use its own drones to strike inside Russia because of restrictions on using NATO weapons on Russian territory.

"Russia has also significantly improved its electronic warfare capabilities during the conflict, which has allowed them to detect and more effectively combat Ukrainian drones by jamming or downing them."

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Putin has given his citizenry the gift that will keep giving…

How Putin's War Is Unleashing a Crisis Back Home in Russia


https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-putins-war-is-unleashing-a-crisis-back-home-in-russia
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
11% have PTSD? No surprise, why some here have repeatedly asked for the Ukranian American suicide mission to end. 400K slaughtered Ukranians, 10 million fled their country forever.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A win for the good guys. Yes, NATO is the good guys, even if I feel peace should have been made a year ago (and now).

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66573842
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Yes, NATO is the good guys

Going to frame this comment.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

oski003 said:

Yes, NATO is the good guys

Going to frame this comment.


Of course I root for the US. Unfortunately, we are led by Holmoe and Knowlton.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

Yes, NATO is the good guys

Going to frame this comment.

Of course I root for the US. Unfortunately, we are led by Holmoe and Knowlton.

It's much worse than that, Tory Nuland and Lindsay Graham...





$40M is actually very cheap, for such a hulking piece of fast hardware.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
10% For The Big Guy said:



2M views on a video published today, impressive.

Macgregor is a real American hero, he's a warrior who knows what he's talking about, and who hasn't sold out to the MIC gravy train.

@BigC, @bearister et al, this right here is your best source of expert and sane information about Ukraine in the English language. You need to watch this, at the very least the first 15min-25min - I'd be very interested in your feedback here.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have no doubt that MacGregor says a lot of things that are true; I believe many media outlets misrepresent how the war is going for the Ukraine; and it would only makes sense that Russia can win a war of attrition against the Ukraine.

My issues:

I don't think MacGregor has anymore right to make the decision for the Ukrainians regarding the level of sacrifice they should make to resist Russian occupation than the United States had to dictate how fiercely the French should have resisted German occupation.

I have an inherent distrust of a man who affiliates himself with tRump, Tucker Carlson and Russian TV (RT).

I am skeptical of his bias and motivations and troubled by articles like these:

Douglas Macgregor Pushes Putin Propaganda on Tucker Carlson Rolling Stone


https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/douglas-macgregor-fox-news-tucker-carlson-russia-ukraine-1318143/

Douglas Macgregor - Wikipedia


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Macgregor
[See Views section]

How Russia Uses Retired US Colonel's Ukraine Misinformation for Domestic Propaganda


https://www.polygraph.info/a/fact-check-how-russia-uses-retired-us-colonel-s-ukraine-misinformation-for-domestic-propaganda-/6972765.html

What is the good Colonel's position on Putin's right to invade and occupy other former Soviet Bloc countries? Does he think Putin is justified seizing only the Ukraine or does he have the right to occupy others as well?

I don't trust his motivations and the company he keeps. Does he have a relationship with Gen. Michael Flynn?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
sonofabear51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thank you
Start Slowly and taper off
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe Russia winds up winning (not what they originally wanted, but holding some conquered territory) . . . but I don't believe MacGregor knows s***.
First Page Last Page
Page 184 of 294
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.