The Official Russian Invasion of Ukraine Thread

861,196 Views | 9883 Replies | Last: 10 hrs ago by sycasey
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:



So while I agree that Putin's fascism is leading to a yes-men culture that caused him to be surprised at how challenging this war would be, he also doesn't care about the impact it has on anyone, not the least of which are the Russian people. That's why it's absolutely bonkers when his cheerleaders here and elsewhere pretend that Putin cares one iota about Russian-speaking people in Ukraine. If he doesn't care about actual Russians, why would he care about the ones who live elsewhere?

The cheerleaders will never answer these questions because they can't criticize Putin and there's no way to acknowledge reality without doing so. Instead they resort to obviously false propaganda.

Bingo!
The Cal88's of the world and other Putin apologists dont have an answer for REALITY.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Unit2Sucks said:



So while I agree that Putin's fascism is leading to a yes-men culture that caused him to be surprised at how challenging this war would be, he also doesn't care about the impact it has on anyone, not the least of which are the Russian people. That's why it's absolutely bonkers when his cheerleaders here and elsewhere pretend that Putin cares one iota about Russian-speaking people in Ukraine. If he doesn't care about actual Russians, why would he care about the ones who live elsewhere?

The cheerleaders will never answer these questions because they can't criticize Putin and there's no way to acknowledge reality without doing so. Instead they resort to obviously false propaganda.

Bingo!
The Cal88's of the world and other Putin apologists dont have an answer for REALITY.


The problem here is that the reality of guys like Unit2 boils down to low-info jingoisms that can be summarized as "Putin is a bad hombre", "Russia is a ****hole" etc... Merely adding some nuance and complexity to this simplistic vision gets you labelled as a "Putin cheerleader".

This is the kind of historical, cultural and political context I am trying to introduce here, I think it would go a long way in broadening your horizons on this important topic:
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:



Just in case anyone is unaware, The Grayzone is Max Blumenthal's news organization that is well known to always take a pro-Kremlin (and pro-Assad, pro-China, pro-Iran) line on things.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grayzone

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/The_Grayzone

They also tend to employ people who work or worked at RT. Again, just so you know.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Your redbaiting is pathetic, Sycasey, borderline Orwellian...

This guy is an academic, who has done remarkable and unique work identifying in the internal political and cultural dynamics in Ukraine from a neutral, academic perspective. The fact that he ended up on the Grayzone is not a sign of partisanship, that was his first appearance there, he just got on my radar this week, I am ordering his book. He has mainly been on other non-partisan NGOs and academic platforms, such as in this interview with Rutgers prof Rossi (whose EE Poli Sci classes are available online) :



Michael Rossi Department of Political Science Masters Program in United Nations and Global Studies Rutgers University Russian Foreign Policy - Summer 2022

Dr. Nicolai Petro, Professor of Political Science at the University of Rhode Island joins me for a discussion of current political, economic, social, and cultural developments and trends in Russia and Ukraine following the military invasion of Ukraine in February 2022

Nicolai N. Petro teaches Comparative and International politics at the University of Rhode Island, and his professional focus is on the role that religion, history, and cultural symbols can play in democratic development. His regional areas of expertise are Russia and Ukraine.

Recommended links: Nicolai Petro's forthcoming (November 2022) book - The Tragedy of Ukraine: What Classical Greek Tragedy can Teach Us about Conflict Resolution https://www.degruyter.com/document/is...


sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Your redbaiting is pathetic, Sycasey, borderline Orwellian...

This guy is an academic, who has done remarkable and unique work identifying in the internal political and cultural dynamics in Ukraine from a neutral, academic perspective. The fact that he ended up on the Grayzone is not a sign of partisanship, that was his first appearance there, he just got on my radar this week, I am ordering his book. He has mainly been on other non-partisan NGOs and academic platforms, such as in this interview with Rutgers prof Rossi (whose EE Poli Sci classes are available online) :
The Grayzone has a reason to present ONLY this guy's work to you. They won't bring on experts who think the US needs to keep supporting Ukraine (and who are clearly in the majority). I think I know why.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

Your redbaiting is pathetic, Sycasey, borderline Orwellian...

This guy is an academic, who has done remarkable and unique work identifying in the internal political and cultural dynamics in Ukraine from a neutral, academic perspective. The fact that he ended up on the Grayzone is not a sign of partisanship, that was his first appearance there, he just got on my radar this week, I am ordering his book. He has mainly been on other non-partisan NGOs and academic platforms, such as in this interview with Rutgers prof Rossi (whose EE Poli Sci classes are available online) :
The Grayzone has a reason to present ONLY this guy's work to you. They won't bring on experts who think the US needs to keep supporting Ukraine (and who are clearly in the majority). I think I know why.

Petro doesn`t go into military policy, his focus is on the underlying internal/domestic historical, cultural and political dynamics of Ukraine, from the perspective of a non-aligned American academic.

It might do you some good to remove your ideological blinders.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

Your redbaiting is pathetic, Sycasey, borderline Orwellian...

This guy is an academic, who has done remarkable and unique work identifying in the internal political and cultural dynamics in Ukraine from a neutral, academic perspective. The fact that he ended up on the Grayzone is not a sign of partisanship, that was his first appearance there, he just got on my radar this week, I am ordering his book. He has mainly been on other non-partisan NGOs and academic platforms, such as in this interview with Rutgers prof Rossi (whose EE Poli Sci classes are available online) :
The Grayzone has a reason to present ONLY this guy's work to you. They won't bring on experts who think the US needs to keep supporting Ukraine (and who are clearly in the majority). I think I know why.

Petro doesn`t go into military policy, his focus is on the underlying internal/domestic historical, cultural and political dynamics of Ukraine, from the perspective of a non-aligned American academic.

It might do you some good to remove your ideological blinders.
This guy wants to lecture others about ideological blinders.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

Your redbaiting is pathetic, Sycasey, borderline Orwellian...

This guy is an academic, who has done remarkable and unique work identifying in the internal political and cultural dynamics in Ukraine from a neutral, academic perspective. The fact that he ended up on the Grayzone is not a sign of partisanship, that was his first appearance there, he just got on my radar this week, I am ordering his book. He has mainly been on other non-partisan NGOs and academic platforms, such as in this interview with Rutgers prof Rossi (whose EE Poli Sci classes are available online) :
The Grayzone has a reason to present ONLY this guy's work to you. They won't bring on experts who think the US needs to keep supporting Ukraine (and who are clearly in the majority). I think I know why.

Petro doesn`t go into military policy, his focus is on the underlying internal/domestic historical, cultural and political dynamics of Ukraine, from the perspective of a non-aligned American academic.

It might do you some good to remove your ideological blinders.
This guy wants to lecture others about ideological blinders.

The issue with ideological blinders her is the lack of basic knowledge about the cultural and historic background in the region. That`s why I`ve provided the input of prof Petro here. This type of content is not driven by ideology, it is basic academic research, and to dismiss it out of hand because he has been on one program can only be attributed to having very narrow ideological blinders.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

Your redbaiting is pathetic, Sycasey, borderline Orwellian...

This guy is an academic, who has done remarkable and unique work identifying in the internal political and cultural dynamics in Ukraine from a neutral, academic perspective. The fact that he ended up on the Grayzone is not a sign of partisanship, that was his first appearance there, he just got on my radar this week, I am ordering his book. He has mainly been on other non-partisan NGOs and academic platforms, such as in this interview with Rutgers prof Rossi (whose EE Poli Sci classes are available online) :
The Grayzone has a reason to present ONLY this guy's work to you. They won't bring on experts who think the US needs to keep supporting Ukraine (and who are clearly in the majority). I think I know why.

Petro doesn`t go into military policy, his focus is on the underlying internal/domestic historical, cultural and political dynamics of Ukraine, from the perspective of a non-aligned American academic.

It might do you some good to remove your ideological blinders.
This guy wants to lecture others about ideological blinders.

The issue with ideological blinders her is the lack of basic knowledge about the cultural and historic background in the region. That`s why I`ve provided the input of prof Petro here. This type of content is not driven by ideology, it is basic academic research, and to dismiss it out of hand because he has been on one program can only be attributed to having very narrow ideological blinders.


Mr. Fake Magazine Covers now wants to lecture others about being misinformed.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Have they explained how they achieve victory, what victory is, and where the new soldiers come from?

Tidbits

Putin reportedly will build up his military to 700,000 men, with another 800,000 reservists (1.5 Million total) to be prepared for the "NATO threat".

There is a rabid anti-Ukraine author in Russia, well known - his daughter was just apparently assassinated near Moscow. This has reportedly inflamed Russians.

Last week a Ukranian mayor gave a Polish mayor some kind of token gift - which ended up having a grenade or two inside. It exploded, only minor injuries.

We're sending Patriot defense missiles to Ukraine. Scott Ritter claims it's ONE missile battery - the definition of political window dressing, if true.

Colonel McGregor worried the longer this drags on, something could explode, backfire, and make it a bigger war. (Like American 'contractors' in Ukraine - what if Putin takes them out??)
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

Your redbaiting is pathetic, Sycasey, borderline Orwellian...

This guy is an academic, who has done remarkable and unique work identifying in the internal political and cultural dynamics in Ukraine from a neutral, academic perspective. The fact that he ended up on the Grayzone is not a sign of partisanship, that was his first appearance there, he just got on my radar this week, I am ordering his book. He has mainly been on other non-partisan NGOs and academic platforms, such as in this interview with Rutgers prof Rossi (whose EE Poli Sci classes are available online) :
The Grayzone has a reason to present ONLY this guy's work to you. They won't bring on experts who think the US needs to keep supporting Ukraine (and who are clearly in the majority). I think I know why.

Petro doesn`t go into military policy, his focus is on the underlying internal/domestic historical, cultural and political dynamics of Ukraine, from the perspective of a non-aligned American academic.

It might do you some good to remove your ideological blinders.
This guy wants to lecture others about ideological blinders.

The issue with ideological blinders her is the lack of basic knowledge about the cultural and historic background in the region. That`s why I`ve provided the input of prof Petro here. This type of content is not driven by ideology, it is basic academic research, and to dismiss it out of hand because he has been on one program can only be attributed to having very narrow ideological blinders.

Mr. Fake Magazine Covers now wants to lecture others about being misinformed.

Use a BS label and go full on ad hominem when all else fails... OK.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Have they explained how they achieve victory, what victory is, and where the new soldiers come from?

...

The other key issue is what is really going on on the battlefront. Gen. Milley and von der Leyen have both recently stated that the Russians and Ukrainians have lost 100,000 KIA each. It looks like the real picture is far more lopsided, with total Russian KIAs and MIAs in the 20,000 range, while Ukrainian totals are around 120,000-140,000. Losses have been very lopsided, reflecting the very sharp difference in the volume of firepower used.

The divergence in opinion about the best course of action here is due to the divergence in perception of what the conflict has really been so far, and what the prospects are next year. I think many people would change their mind if they realized that the war looks like a lopsided bloodbath, that needs to be stopped for Ukraine`s sake.

Many people here believe that the Russians are a keystone cops clownshow army that Ukraine can roll back with NATO support, and that`s very far from being the real picture. The question is, how long is it going to take (and how many more tens/hundreds of thousands more casualties) it is going to take for reality to set in.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

movielover said:

Have they explained how they achieve victory, what victory is, and where the new soldiers come from?

...

The other key issue is what is really going on on the battlefront. Gen. Milley and von der Leyen have both recently stated that the Russians and Ukrainians have lost 100,000 KIA each. It looks like the real picture is far more lopsided, with total Russian KIAs and MIAs in the 20,000 range, while Ukrainian totals are around 120,000-140,000. Losses have been very lopsided, reflecting the very sharp difference in the volume of firepower used.

The divergence in opinion about the best course of action here is due to the divergence in perception of what the conflict has really been so far, and what the prospects are next year. I think many people would change their mind if they realized that the war looks like a lopsided bloodbath, that needs to be stopped for Ukraine`s sake.

Many people here believe that the Russians are a keystone cops clownshow army that Ukraine can roll back with NATO support, and that`s very far from being the real picture. The question is, how long is it going to take (and how many more tens/hundreds of thousands more casualties) it is going to take for reality to set in.


If only 20,000 Kia, why did the Russians draft soldiers and put untrained soldiers and prisoners on the battlefront?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

Your redbaiting is pathetic, Sycasey, borderline Orwellian...

This guy is an academic, who has done remarkable and unique work identifying in the internal political and cultural dynamics in Ukraine from a neutral, academic perspective. The fact that he ended up on the Grayzone is not a sign of partisanship, that was his first appearance there, he just got on my radar this week, I am ordering his book. He has mainly been on other non-partisan NGOs and academic platforms, such as in this interview with Rutgers prof Rossi (whose EE Poli Sci classes are available online) :
The Grayzone has a reason to present ONLY this guy's work to you. They won't bring on experts who think the US needs to keep supporting Ukraine (and who are clearly in the majority). I think I know why.

Petro doesn`t go into military policy, his focus is on the underlying internal/domestic historical, cultural and political dynamics of Ukraine, from the perspective of a non-aligned American academic.

It might do you some good to remove your ideological blinders.
This guy wants to lecture others about ideological blinders.

The issue with ideological blinders her is the lack of basic knowledge about the cultural and historic background in the region. That`s why I`ve provided the input of prof Petro here. This type of content is not driven by ideology, it is basic academic research, and to dismiss it out of hand because he has been on one program can only be attributed to having very narrow ideological blinders.

Mr. Fake Magazine Covers now wants to lecture others about being misinformed.

Use a BS label and go full on ad hominem when all else fails... OK.
You could argue that I'm using ad hominem, but then I would argue that it's justified in this case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
Quote:

Valid ad hominem arguments occur in informal logic, where the person making the argument relies on arguments from authority such as testimony, expertise, or a selective presentation of information supporting the position they are advocating. In this case, counterarguments may be made that the target is dishonest or lacks the claimed expertise.
That's what I'm doing. The motives and trustworthiness of you and your sources are in question. You can't complain about me criticizing those things, because you were just doing the same to others in this thread. Seems like there's plenty of ad hominem to go around.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russians are crowdfunding to raise money for supplies for their soldiers.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/22/europe/russians-crowdfund-soldiers-ukraine-cmd-intl/index.html
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Cal88 said:

movielover said:

Have they explained how they achieve victory, what victory is, and where the new soldiers come from?

...

The other key issue is what is really going on on the battlefront. Gen. Milley and von der Leyen have both recently stated that the Russians and Ukrainians have lost 100,000 KIA each. It looks like the real picture is far more lopsided, with total Russian KIAs and MIAs in the 20,000 range, while Ukrainian totals are around 120,000-140,000. Losses have been very lopsided, reflecting the very sharp difference in the volume of firepower used.

The divergence in opinion about the best course of action here is due to the divergence in perception of what the conflict has really been so far, and what the prospects are next year. I think many people would change their mind if they realized that the war looks like a lopsided bloodbath, that needs to be stopped for Ukraine`s sake.

Many people here believe that the Russians are a keystone cops clownshow army that Ukraine can roll back with NATO support, and that`s very far from being the real picture. The question is, how long is it going to take (and how many more tens/hundreds of thousands more casualties) it is going to take for reality to set in.

If only 20,000 Kia, why did the Russians draft soldiers and put untrained soldiers and prisoners on the battlefront?

You`d have to add another 40,000+ injured to those 20,000KIAs, so that`s nearly a third of their starting army. They`ve plugged in those gaps prior to going through a major mobilization, which only happened in October.

Ukraine also has tens of thousands of injured, and an even bigger number of MIAs and deserters. Ukraine sent its prisoners to the front last Spring, and is on its 8th or 9th major mobilization round IIRC. Back then they also banned men 18-60 from leaving the country. I think this law also applies to their women now, there is a large number already in uniform, some on the front, many in support positions. As well, Zaluzhny just stiffened the punishments for desertion, which indicates that it has been a serious problem in Ukraine. I expect Ukraine to start conscripting its expats in Poland, where a lot of young Ukrainians fled, with the cooperation of the Polish government.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Putin apologist (cough) Scott Ritter mentions the Russians have a superior tank even to the USA (?), the T-90M and T-80.

How do our current tanks match up?

https://www.businessinsider.com/putin-should-worry-about-ukraine-capturing-new-russian-t90m-tank-2022-10

Ritter mentions how the recent Economist article downplayed their comic PM, and featured their General. But then days later, the comic shows up, tin cup in hand, for one of the most corrupt nations on Earth. Seems catatonic.

(The gal on 90 Day Fiance from Ukraine is also a piece of work.)
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interesting article for tank junkies. I have no idea if it is a defense contractor financed puff piece:

The Tank Is Not Obsolete, and Other Observations About the Future of Combat - War on the Rocks


https://warontherocks.com/2022/09/the-tank-is-not-obsolete-and-other-observations-about-the-future-of-combat
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This whole conversation is ridiculous. No one really believes that this war has fpck all to do with people in Ukraine or anything like that. Putin wants the 2 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in Ukraine's Black Sea shelf. He needs to keep his shwthole petro state going and all that Black Sea natural gas is a threat to him bec Russia has no other economic juice.

That's why Putin will throw as many old broken Russians as he has to at this war and will destroy as much of Ukraine as he needs to. He doesn't care what happens there so long as he prevents that NG from entering the market without him getting his cut.

I'm glad to see others have begun to realize how pointless it is to spar with Putin's cheerleaders. They have no interest in a reasonable discussion.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

This whole conversation is ridiculous. No one really believes that this war has fpck all to do with people in Ukraine or anything like that. Putin wants the 2 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in Ukraine's Black Sea shelf. He needs to keep his shwthole petro state going and all that Black Sea natural gas is a threat to him bec Russia has no other economic juice.

That's why Putin will throw as many old broken Russians as he has to at this war and will destroy as much of Ukraine as he needs to. He doesn't care what happens there so long as he prevents that NG from entering the market without him getting his cut.

I'm glad to see others have begun to realize how pointless it is to spar with Putin's cheerleaders. They have no interest in a reasonable discussion.

Sorry but that`s just an incredibly dumb statement and explanation. Russia already is the richest country in the world in fossil fuels (oil, gas and coal), they already have the world`s largest natural gas reserves. They`ve barely tapped their shale oil, while US shale oil is now peaking. Putin didn`t put his country through a dangerous and bloody war by proxy against NATO for 2 trillion cubic feet of gas, when Russia`s natural gas reserves stand at 1,700 trillion cubic feet, that`s just beyond laughable.

Russia is an industrial power, set to pass Germany this decade to become the world`s 5th largest economy PPP. It has just about every resource and mineral in droves, and the cheapest energy costs in the world. They have already cornered the world wheat market, and are set to corner many industrial sectors that are energy intensive, like aluminum, steel, cement, paper, fertilizers etc, while western Europe and much of the world will struggle due to energy poverty.

Russia was economically annihilated in the 1990s, when its assets were carved out, its industry destroyed by neoliberal shock therapy "reforms", which were essentially a scheme to economically subjugate that country and to carve out its assets. Nearly half the country was plunged into abject poverty, rampant criminality, alcohol addiction and even hunger prevailed, somewhere between 5 to 10 million Russians died prematurely. The 1990s were one of the major catastrophic eras of Russia, along with the advent of Bolsheviks, who killed somewhere between 20 and 40 million Russians, and the nazi aggression which killed another 20 million Russians.

Objectively speaking, Putin has been very popular in Russia because he righted the ship and pulled Russia out of its neoliberal misery. After the Soviet state and currency collapsed in the 90s, Putin ended up having to drive a cab in St Petersburg in order to make ends meet. This period was a decade of deep economic struggle and trauma for the country, Russians who lived through it are grateful to Putin for having restored his country's social fiber and economy. He took back the country's assets from oligarchs, nationalizing oil and gas, paid off the country's crippling debt and build huge currency, gold reserves along with a national fund.

Ukraine on the other hand is still stuck in a neoliberal dystopia, oligarchs still run the country, while the muscle is provided by right wing militias. Zelinsky was the creation of one of these oligarchs, Kolomoisky, who like the other oligarchs had muscled in on Ukrainian state assets and built a media empire, producing a heavily-promoted TV show with Mr Z starring about a teacher turned politician who does a Mr Smith goes to Washington routine, gets elected president and cleans up the government. That show and role helped propel Zelensky to the real version of Ukrainian presidency. Zelensky also used his russophone persona in order to sell Russophone voters on a platform of peace and reconciliation, before doing a 180 after getting elected, in part because right wing militias were completely against that, and they were the political muscle in Kiev.

Without this corruption, Ukraine would have been a rich country, they have a lot of natural resources, and a well-educated population. Ukraine was the most industrialized, most advanced state in the Soviet Union. A lot of the industry and infrastructure that was built in the Soviet era was left to rot. The other problem in Ukraine is that the country is roughly divided in half in terms of its heritage and national identity, with Western Ukraine/Galicia being closer to a Central European Slav identity while the south and east are russophone regions with a Russian-Ukrainian Malorussian culture.

The exploitation of these divisions between Galicia and Malorussia is at the heart of this war, the cultural dynamics aren't unlike those that tore apart Yugoslavia in the 90s. Much like in Yugoslavia, these two communities have a lot more in common than not, but have been hampered by the rise of a brand Western Ukrainian nationalism that was hostile to the Russophones. It is a shame that this took place while in the rest of Europe those issues were resolved (Spain, Ireland, Belgium etc). That was the focus of Prof. Petro presentations I have posted above, I strongly recommend his presentations, which not only describe the problem of the Ukrainian conflict, but also offers solutions and a path to peace in that country.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Originally I thought Putin would simply be happy w the Donbas being truly independent and NATO backing off; I wonder now if he would settle for the eastern part of Ukraine?

If Russia were truly a paper tiger, it would mean Putin has been drinking vodka and playing around for 15 years. He doesn't strike me like that kind of man (Biden). He is more like Xi or Trump, a head of state who gets stuff done.

This proxy war probably drives China and Russia closer together, and shows the folly of green energy.

We'll see.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This whole situation is trash

Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

This whole situation is trash




I don't think we can really "end" homelessness. Some of it is economic but that's not enough.

But really, I don't agree that we should look at Ukraine aid the way you might be. We spend FAR too much on our military and the Ukraine aid is the best military spend we've had in decades.

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

This proxy war probably drives China and Russia closer together, and shows the folly of green energy.

What?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

movielover said:

This proxy war probably drives China and Russia closer together, and shows the folly of green energy.

What?


Fox News Talking Points #4 and # 23 were pulled out of the bingo blower at the same time and put on the table.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

Your redbaiting is pathetic, Sycasey, borderline Orwellian...

This guy is an academic, who has done remarkable and unique work identifying in the internal political and cultural dynamics in Ukraine from a neutral, academic perspective. The fact that he ended up on the Grayzone is not a sign of partisanship, that was his first appearance there, he just got on my radar this week, I am ordering his book. He has mainly been on other non-partisan NGOs and academic platforms, such as in this interview with Rutgers prof Rossi (whose EE Poli Sci classes are available online) :
The Grayzone has a reason to present ONLY this guy's work to you. They won't bring on experts who think the US needs to keep supporting Ukraine (and who are clearly in the majority). I think I know why.

Petro doesn`t go into military policy, his focus is on the underlying internal/domestic historical, cultural and political dynamics of Ukraine, from the perspective of a non-aligned American academic.

It might do you some good to remove your ideological blinders.
This guy wants to lecture others about ideological blinders.

The issue with ideological blinders her is the lack of basic knowledge about the cultural and historic background in the region. That`s why I`ve provided the input of prof Petro here. This type of content is not driven by ideology, it is basic academic research, and to dismiss it out of hand because he has been on one program can only be attributed to having very narrow ideological blinders.

If you think basic academic research by political scientists isn't driven by ideology, you haven't hung around with any political scientists.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

This proxy war probably drives China and Russia closer together, and shows the folly of green energy.

What?


Fox News Talking Points #4 and # 23 were pulled out of the bingo blower at the same time and put on the table.



We also would have accepted mentioning any of the following:

1. Wokeism

2. Hunter Biden

3. Hillary's emails

4. Benghazi

5. Transgender bathrooms


bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Transgender bathrooms"

That one gives them more pee anxiety than a Raider fan at the sink in the Men's Room at the Oakland Coliseum with 10 drunks behind him waiting their turn to de-beer.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Homelessness has about four primary issues we have ignored for decades.

1. Our drug culture (the Left supports this)
2. Severe mental illness (how much affect did the movie Cuckoos Nest have?)
3. Fentanyl influx vis our southern border and ports (China)
4. 20-40+ Million illegal immigrants have dramatically pushed out the Demand curve for low- or Miderate-income housing (Southern Border)

Wall Street Globalists don't care if Latino families live three families to a small apartment; they want an endless supply of $10 hr or $16 hr labor. Preferably young, strong, and compliant.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
40 million undocumented workers?

Where did that number come from ?
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

40 million undocumented workers?

Where did that number come from ?


….out of his butt along with some flying monkeys.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Reading and Ivy Leagus research.

What is your fantasy number?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Putin calls the Patriot Dystem old, says their S-300 system is better.

Claims Ukraine blew up Nord Stream. (Clever blameshifting from CIA or other?)



Says Ukraine refuses to negotiate.

Speaks confidently, without notes (ahem).
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
General Petraeus agrees with the DC MIC, makes Afghanistan comparisons.

Col McGregor claims:

- Ukraine now admits to 100k military killed, 35k MIA.
- Ukraine enlisting 13 and 14 year olds?

Previously has said this will end when Germany pulls the plug, and Germany is suffering due to green energy foolishness.

Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russia is still a shjthole.





First Page Last Page
Page 75 of 283
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.