The Official Russian Invasion of Ukraine Thread

874,595 Views | 9916 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by bear2034
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shipwreckedcrew: "Obama's C team is running the country."

Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Excellent article about the cluster*****that is the current state of US foreign policy.

https://open.substack.com/pub/meaninginhistory/p/the-pivot-to-china-bad-to-worse?r=aiop6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another great History Legends video. He notes Zelensky recently said he had 880K strong army, but now needs 500K new recruits? Politico says UKR lines thin.

cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

bearister said:

Massive Ukrainian effort underway to clear millions of landmines spread across country - CBS News


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/massive-ukrainian-effort-underway-to-clear-millions-of-landmines-60-minutes-transcript/


Flutter mine dropped from Russian planes. 11 ounces of pressure detonates it.

Putin doesn't believe that Ukraine has a right to exist. Although he initially may have been deluded enough to believe his own musings on Ukraine that they would want to fall under his autocratic regime, I would assume he has realized that Ukraine, like all former Soviet republics, is uninterested in joining a corrupt kleptocracy. Maybe they don't see the attraction in Russia's abysmally low life expectancy for men - which doesn't even account for the war.

That being the case, we are seeing more of a scorched-earth approach to the war as it drags on. Dropping millions of flutter mines is consistent with that strategy. Putin is fine with Ukraine becoming uninhabitable, what he isn't fine with is people in Ukraine benefiting from a better relationship with the West. To that end, we are seeing more and more civil infrastructure attacks and attacks targeting residential and industrial areas with no legitimate military targets (this weekend saw more of in Kharkiv). Just like hundreds of thousands of able young men and women have fled Russia to give themselves a chance to prosper in the West, Ukraine is becoming depopulated. Loss for Ukraine, not really a win for Russia, except insofar as achieving their goal of destroying Ukraine's economy and society.

You will note that in order to avoid the world focusing on this genocide, the shills have been directed to shift their propaganda campaign to the Gaza front. Putin's imagineers have determined that it's better for Russia to grandstand on civilian deaths in Gaza than to allow people to realize what he's done in Ukraine. That's why you are seeing a shift in the numerous vaguely named Russian state media trolls on twiter (Bebo is currently the most popular but they are numerous) who have devoted a portion of their misinformation toward Israel.
> " Putin doesn't believe that Ukraine has a right to exist"

Please supply some Putin quotes to support your assertion. Otherwise, we'll have to assume that you have no idea what you're talking about.

What IS 100% true is that Putin doesn't believe that Ukraine has a right to join NATO,
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

Excellent article about the cluster*****that is the current state of US foreign policy.

https://open.substack.com/pub/meaninginhistory/p/the-pivot-to-china-bad-to-worse?r=aiop6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
This is what I've been saying for years!

U.S./EU-style NeoLiberal/Milton Friedman/"trickle-down" economics is unsustainable. By its nature, it transfers the wealth of a majority of its working people to the oligarchs, who cry out in frustration that there just aren't any good investments with a decent ROI.

At the same time, producers of consumer products cry out in frustration that there are no markets for their products -- because the entire class of Workers -- who are also their Customers -- are surviving on subsistence wages, and don't have sufficient disposable income to afford much beyond rent and food.

So instead of investing in the production of consumer products (including the Labor to produce them), U.S. corporations "invest" in buying back shares of their own stock.

For decades, U.S. Workers purchased their manufactured products from China, and from manufacturers outside the U.S. Most of those dollars were then recycled, by foreign professionals & oligarchs, back into investments in U.S. Treasuries, U.S. equities, and U.S. real estate.

Now the U.S. NeoCons are seriously considering using the U.S. investments of Russian oligarchs to pay for the continued Lost War in Ukraine!

You can bet that foreign professionals & oligarchs will make a note of this, and sell their U.S. real estate & equities, realizing that IF China & the U.S. are at war, the U.S. will probably be defaulting on their Treasuries.

In the NeoCons' efforts to weaken the economies of Russia, China, and the EU (yes, the EU -- that's why we sabotaged the Nordstream pipeline), we've actually weakened our own economy even more.

This is the "house of cards" economy that a majority of U.S. voters are simply unwilling to stomach any longer.

Forcing Russia and China (and Germany, and France, and Sweden, and Finland, and...) to invest in their own weapons production will be a temporary setback for their economies. But in the long run, they'll actually massively out-produce our own overly-financialized and under-producing weapons "manufacturers" (who focus much more on producing profits than weapons!).

More soon...
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

movielover said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Palestinian Chicken said:



As long as we're indulging in 40 year old conspiracy theories, do you have any about the Hindenburg? Surely we must have used HAARP to induce a thunderstorm over New Jersey and get lightning to set the blimp on fire. This then greased the skids for the US to take sides in WW2.

Who blew up Nordstream?
I'm sure Germany can figure it out

The Scholtz government somehow can't seem to figure it out, neither do the Swedes or Danes.


1. What world power's president said they would do it?
2. What world power benefitted by selling more LNG at inflated prices?
3. What world power has such sway w the EU and NATO, nobody squaks?
4. What functionaries gloated about it?
5. Who did Seymour Hersh reveal as the culprit?

Same answer for all five.

Blinken as well was obsessed with Nordstream - he literally wrote the book about the necessity to cut off Europe from the Russian pipelines.



"This book, written in 1987, goes a long way in explaining the context for the NordStream sabotage of 26 September 2022."

You have to be completely re1arded to not be able to connect the dots here.


Sounds like you are re1arded because you keep asking
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

movielover said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Palestinian Chicken said:



As long as we're indulging in 40 year old conspiracy theories, do you have any about the Hindenburg? Surely we must have used HAARP to induce a thunderstorm over New Jersey and get lightning to set the blimp on fire. This then greased the skids for the US to take sides in WW2.

Who blew up Nordstream?
I'm sure Germany can figure it out

The Scholtz government somehow can't seem to figure it out, neither do the Swedes or Danes.


1. What world power's president said they would do it?
2. What world power benefitted by selling more LNG at inflated prices?
3. What world power has such sway w the EU and NATO, nobody squaks?
4. What functionaries gloated about it?
5. Who did Seymour Hersh reveal as the culprit?

Same answer for all five.

Blinken as well was obsessed with Nordstream - he literally wrote the book about the necessity to cut off Europe from the Russian pipelines.



"This book, written in 1987, goes a long way in explaining the context for the NordStream sabotage of 26 September 2022."

You have to be completely re1arded to not be able to connect the dots here.


Sounds like you are re1arded because you keep asking

Another smart and informative contribution by dajo.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

movielover said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Palestinian Chicken said:



As long as we're indulging in 40 year old conspiracy theories, do you have any about the Hindenburg? Surely we must have used HAARP to induce a thunderstorm over New Jersey and get lightning to set the blimp on fire. This then greased the skids for the US to take sides in WW2.

Who blew up Nordstream?
I'm sure Germany can figure it out

The Scholtz government somehow can't seem to figure it out, neither do the Swedes or Danes.


1. What world power's president said they would do it?
2. What world power benefitted by selling more LNG at inflated prices?
3. What world power has such sway w the EU and NATO, nobody squaks?
4. What functionaries gloated about it?
5. Who did Seymour Hersh reveal as the culprit?

Same answer for all five.

Blinken as well was obsessed with Nordstream - he literally wrote the book about the necessity to cut off Europe from the Russian pipelines.



"This book, written in 1987, goes a long way in explaining the context for the NordStream sabotage of 26 September 2022."

You have to be completely re1arded to not be able to connect the dots here.


Sounds like you are re1arded because you keep asking

Another smart and informative contribution by dajo.


If you want to accuse the U.S. of something then just do it. Nobody cares about that story other than you and the rest of the America haters here.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bearister said:

Massive Ukrainian effort underway to clear millions of landmines spread across country - CBS News


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/massive-ukrainian-effort-underway-to-clear-millions-of-landmines-60-minutes-transcript/


Flutter mine dropped from Russian planes. 11 ounces of pressure detonates it.

Putin doesn't believe that Ukraine has a right to exist. Although he initially may have been deluded enough to believe his own musings on Ukraine that they would want to fall under his autocratic regime, I would assume he has realized that Ukraine, like all former Soviet republics, is uninterested in joining a corrupt kleptocracy. Maybe they don't see the attraction in Russia's abysmally low life expectancy for men - which doesn't even account for the war.

That being the case, we are seeing more of a scorched-earth approach to the war as it drags on. Dropping millions of flutter mines is consistent with that strategy. Putin is fine with Ukraine becoming uninhabitable, what he isn't fine with is people in Ukraine benefiting from a better relationship with the West. To that end, we are seeing more and more civil infrastructure attacks and attacks targeting residential and industrial areas with no legitimate military targets (this weekend saw more of in Kharkiv). Just like hundreds of thousands of able young men and women have fled Russia to give themselves a chance to prosper in the West, Ukraine is becoming depopulated. Loss for Ukraine, not really a win for Russia, except insofar as achieving their goal of destroying Ukraine's economy and society.

You will note that in order to avoid the world focusing on this genocide, the shills have been directed to shift their propaganda campaign to the Gaza front. Putin's imagineers have determined that it's better for Russia to grandstand on civilian deaths in Gaza than to allow people to realize what he's done in Ukraine. That's why you are seeing a shift in the numerous vaguely named Russian state media trolls on twiter (Bebo is currently the most popular but they are numerous) who have devoted a portion of their misinformation toward Israel.
> " Putin doesn't believe that Ukraine has a right to exist"

Please supply some Putin quotes to support your assertion. Otherwise, we'll have to assume that you have no idea what you're talking about.

What IS 100% true is that Putin doesn't believe that Ukraine has a right to join NATO,


It's amazing how many lies U2S manages to pack into 3 paragraphs, relaying the most misguided, unfounded, worst propaganda about the Ukraine war. Here are a few corrections:

-the notion that Ukraine, which started out as the richest, most industrialized state in the USSR, but 25 years later became 3 times poorer per capita as Russia, is less corrupt than Russia. Whatever you can say about Putin, he clamped out on his oligarchs, nationalized major natural resources conglomerates, paid off Russian debt and made substantial investments in Russian infrastructure.

-Ukraine has dropped thousands of butterfly mines on large cities like Donetsk, which it has bombed indiscriminately and consistently since 2014.

-Russia has spared Ukrainian large cities that aren't on the front from indiscriminate bombing. Around 95% of the Ukrainians they have killed in this war were soldiers.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bearister said:

Massive Ukrainian effort underway to clear millions of landmines spread across country - CBS News


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/massive-ukrainian-effort-underway-to-clear-millions-of-landmines-60-minutes-transcript/


Flutter mine dropped from Russian planes. 11 ounces of pressure detonates it.

Putin doesn't believe that Ukraine has a right to exist. Although he initially may have been deluded enough to believe his own musings on Ukraine that they would want to fall under his autocratic regime, I would assume he has realized that Ukraine, like all former Soviet republics, is uninterested in joining a corrupt kleptocracy. Maybe they don't see the attraction in Russia's abysmally low life expectancy for men - which doesn't even account for the war.

That being the case, we are seeing more of a scorched-earth approach to the war as it drags on. Dropping millions of flutter mines is consistent with that strategy. Putin is fine with Ukraine becoming uninhabitable, what he isn't fine with is people in Ukraine benefiting from a better relationship with the West. To that end, we are seeing more and more civil infrastructure attacks and attacks targeting residential and industrial areas with no legitimate military targets (this weekend saw more of in Kharkiv). Just like hundreds of thousands of able young men and women have fled Russia to give themselves a chance to prosper in the West, Ukraine is becoming depopulated. Loss for Ukraine, not really a win for Russia, except insofar as achieving their goal of destroying Ukraine's economy and society.

You will note that in order to avoid the world focusing on this genocide, the shills have been directed to shift their propaganda campaign to the Gaza front. Putin's imagineers have determined that it's better for Russia to grandstand on civilian deaths in Gaza than to allow people to realize what he's done in Ukraine. That's why you are seeing a shift in the numerous vaguely named Russian state media trolls on twiter (Bebo is currently the most popular but they are numerous) who have devoted a portion of their misinformation toward Israel.
> " Putin doesn't believe that Ukraine has a right to exist"

Please supply some Putin quotes to support your assertion. Otherwise, we'll have to assume that you have no idea what you're talking about.

What IS 100% true is that Putin doesn't believe that Ukraine has a right to join NATO,



This is what he said:

"All the southern Russian lands were transferred during the formation of Soviet Ukraine, during the creation of the USSR. There was no Ukraine within the empire: there were oblasts, but Ukraine itself, which came [into the Russian empire ed.] in the 16th century, consisted of three oblasts: the city of Kyiv and the oblasts of Kyiv, Zhytomyr and Chernihiv that's all. It came from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Rzeczpospolita), from Poland, voluntarily.

We have a letter in our archives: 'We, the Orthodox people of Rus, appeal to Moscow, to the tsar, and so on.' And in an attempt to defend their rights, they also sent appeals to Warsaw: 'We, the Orthodox people of Rus, ask you to preserve this and that, and demand this.'

Then what happened happened. The Soviet Union was formed and a vast Ukraine was formed, first and foremost, to a significant extent, at the expense of the southern Russian lands - the entire Black Sea region and so on - although all of these cities, as you know, were founded by Catherine the Great after a series of wars with Turkey, the Ottoman Empire."





Quote: "This is what is at the centre of the conflict that is happening today. This is the cause of this conflict.

And of course, if we had had normal, modern, friendly relations with fraternal Ukraine we are brothers as far as ethnicity is concerned! no one would have thought of taking actions related to Crimea, for example.

They simply put us in a position where we could do nothing else but defend the people living there. The same thing happened later with Donbas and Novorossiya [Ukraine's south]."

"Let me emphasize once again that Ukraine for us is not just a neighboring country. It is an integral part of our own history, culture, spiritual space.

"These are our comrades, relatives, among whom are not only colleagues, friends, former colleagues, but also relatives, people connected with us by blood, family ties."
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

movielover said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Palestinian Chicken said:



As long as we're indulging in 40 year old conspiracy theories, do you have any about the Hindenburg? Surely we must have used HAARP to induce a thunderstorm over New Jersey and get lightning to set the blimp on fire. This then greased the skids for the US to take sides in WW2.

Who blew up Nordstream?
I'm sure Germany can figure it out

The Scholtz government somehow can't seem to figure it out, neither do the Swedes or Danes.


1. What world power's president said they would do it?
2. What world power benefitted by selling more LNG at inflated prices?
3. What world power has such sway w the EU and NATO, nobody squaks?
4. What functionaries gloated about it?
5. Who did Seymour Hersh reveal as the culprit?

Same answer for all five.

Blinken as well was obsessed with Nordstream - he literally wrote the book about the necessity to cut off Europe from the Russian pipelines.



"This book, written in 1987, goes a long way in explaining the context for the NordStream sabotage of 26 September 2022."

You have to be completely re1arded to not be able to connect the dots here.


Sounds like you are re1arded because you keep asking

Another smart and informative contribution by dajo.


If you want to accuse the U.S. of something then just do it. Nobody cares about that story other than you and the rest of the America haters here.

Nobody cares about Nordstream, the biggest act of state terror on infrastructure in European history??
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bearister said:

Massive Ukrainian effort underway to clear millions of landmines spread across country - CBS News


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/massive-ukrainian-effort-underway-to-clear-millions-of-landmines-60-minutes-transcript/


Flutter mine dropped from Russian planes. 11 ounces of pressure detonates it.

Putin doesn't believe that Ukraine has a right to exist. Although he initially may have been deluded enough to believe his own musings on Ukraine that they would want to fall under his autocratic regime, I would assume he has realized that Ukraine, like all former Soviet republics, is uninterested in joining a corrupt kleptocracy. Maybe they don't see the attraction in Russia's abysmally low life expectancy for men - which doesn't even account for the war.

That being the case, we are seeing more of a scorched-earth approach to the war as it drags on. Dropping millions of flutter mines is consistent with that strategy. Putin is fine with Ukraine becoming uninhabitable, what he isn't fine with is people in Ukraine benefiting from a better relationship with the West. To that end, we are seeing more and more civil infrastructure attacks and attacks targeting residential and industrial areas with no legitimate military targets (this weekend saw more of in Kharkiv). Just like hundreds of thousands of able young men and women have fled Russia to give themselves a chance to prosper in the West, Ukraine is becoming depopulated. Loss for Ukraine, not really a win for Russia, except insofar as achieving their goal of destroying Ukraine's economy and society.

You will note that in order to avoid the world focusing on this genocide, the shills have been directed to shift their propaganda campaign to the Gaza front. Putin's imagineers have determined that it's better for Russia to grandstand on civilian deaths in Gaza than to allow people to realize what he's done in Ukraine. That's why you are seeing a shift in the numerous vaguely named Russian state media trolls on twiter (Bebo is currently the most popular but they are numerous) who have devoted a portion of their misinformation toward Israel.
> " Putin doesn't believe that Ukraine has a right to exist"

Please supply some Putin quotes to support your assertion. Otherwise, we'll have to assume that you have no idea what you're talking about.

What IS 100% true is that Putin doesn't believe that Ukraine has a right to join NATO,

I've written about that in this thread before. Given how effortlessly you amplify Russian propaganda, I'm surprised you haven't internalized this yet. Hopefully sharing this will help complete your adoption of Putin's talking points to justify his genocide of Ukraine (which he would argue isn't a genocide because Ukrainians aren't a people and their country isn't real).

Here's one of my posts on the topic.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

movielover said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Palestinian Chicken said:



As long as we're indulging in 40 year old conspiracy theories, do you have any about the Hindenburg? Surely we must have used HAARP to induce a thunderstorm over New Jersey and get lightning to set the blimp on fire. This then greased the skids for the US to take sides in WW2.

Who blew up Nordstream?
I'm sure Germany can figure it out

The Scholtz government somehow can't seem to figure it out, neither do the Swedes or Danes.


1. What world power's president said they would do it?
2. What world power benefitted by selling more LNG at inflated prices?
3. What world power has such sway w the EU and NATO, nobody squaks?
4. What functionaries gloated about it?
5. Who did Seymour Hersh reveal as the culprit?

Same answer for all five.

Blinken as well was obsessed with Nordstream - he literally wrote the book about the necessity to cut off Europe from the Russian pipelines.



"This book, written in 1987, goes a long way in explaining the context for the NordStream sabotage of 26 September 2022."

You have to be completely re1arded to not be able to connect the dots here.


Sounds like you are re1arded because you keep asking

Another smart and informative contribution by dajo.


If you want to accuse the U.S. of something then just do it. Nobody cares about that story other than you and the rest of the America haters here.

Nobody cares about Nordstream, the biggest act of state terror on infrastructure in European history??
How soon we forget WW1, WW2, Napoleon, Genghis Khan, etc.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

movielover said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Palestinian Chicken said:



As long as we're indulging in 40 year old conspiracy theories, do you have any about the Hindenburg? Surely we must have used HAARP to induce a thunderstorm over New Jersey and get lightning to set the blimp on fire. This then greased the skids for the US to take sides in WW2.

Who blew up Nordstream?
I'm sure Germany can figure it out

The Scholtz government somehow can't seem to figure it out, neither do the Swedes or Danes.


1. What world power's president said they would do it?
2. What world power benefitted by selling more LNG at inflated prices?
3. What world power has such sway w the EU and NATO, nobody squaks?
4. What functionaries gloated about it?
5. Who did Seymour Hersh reveal as the culprit?

Same answer for all five.

Blinken as well was obsessed with Nordstream - he literally wrote the book about the necessity to cut off Europe from the Russian pipelines.



"This book, written in 1987, goes a long way in explaining the context for the NordStream sabotage of 26 September 2022."

You have to be completely re1arded to not be able to connect the dots here.


Sounds like you are re1arded because you keep asking

Another smart and informative contribution by dajo.


If you want to accuse the U.S. of something then just do it. Nobody cares about that story other than you and the rest of the America haters here.

Nobody cares about Nordstream, the biggest act of state terror on infrastructure in European history??
How soon we forget WW1, WW2, Napoleon, Genghis Khan, etc.

Do you understand the difference between an act of state terror on infrastructure and world wars?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who burned down Moscow in 1812?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Who burned down Moscow in 1812?


The Russians, likely under orders of the governor, burned down Moscow as Napoleon was about to conquer the city.

Do you have any other unrelated questions? Do you think it was also the CIA?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Was Moscow considered infrastructure or was 1812 Moscow not up to the standards of what we would consider to be "infrastructure"?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Was Moscow considered infrastructure or was 1812 Moscow not up to the standards of what we would consider to be "infrastructure"?


Is that why the Biden left all of our weapons to the Taliban in our messy Afghanistan withdrawal ? We simply did not want to commit an act of terrorism by blowing them up? Is that another reason why actual terrorists are using U.S. weapons?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When Hitler flooded the Berlin subways killing 10,000 Berliners was that state sponsored terrorism?
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

When Hitler flooded the Berlin subways killing 10,000 Berliners was that state sponsored terrorism?
Not sure how you arrived at this topic, but you could argue that Hitler's flood was Putin's inspiration for destroying the Kakhovka Dam but it's more comparable to Russia's destruction of a dam in Ukraine in 1941 when it was on the run from Hitler.

Those two dam destructions by Stalin I and Stalin II (or whatever name Putin will take when he declares Russia an empire) were arguably the largest acts of state-sponsored terrorism, depending of course on how you view 9/11.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

dajo9 said:

When Hitler flooded the Berlin subways killing 10,000 Berliners was that state sponsored terrorism?
Not sure how you arrived at this topic, but you could argue that Hitler's flood was Putin's inspiration for destroying the Kakhovka Dam but it's more comparable to Russia's destruction of a dam in Ukraine in 1941 when it was on the run from Hitler.

Those two dam destructions by Stalin I and Stalin II (or whatever name Putin will take when he declares Russia an empire) were arguably the largest acts of state-sponsored terrorism, depending of course on how you view 9/11.


9/11 is out of bounds. The allegation was in regards to Europe. Also, 9/11 was not state sponsored. There is no room for conspiracy theories on these boards.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

movielover said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Palestinian Chicken said:



As long as we're indulging in 40 year old conspiracy theories, do you have any about the Hindenburg? Surely we must have used HAARP to induce a thunderstorm over New Jersey and get lightning to set the blimp on fire. This then greased the skids for the US to take sides in WW2.

Who blew up Nordstream?
I'm sure Germany can figure it out

The Scholtz government somehow can't seem to figure it out, neither do the Swedes or Danes.


1. What world power's president said they would do it?
2. What world power benefitted by selling more LNG at inflated prices?
3. What world power has such sway w the EU and NATO, nobody squaks?
4. What functionaries gloated about it?
5. Who did Seymour Hersh reveal as the culprit?

Same answer for all five.

Blinken as well was obsessed with Nordstream - he literally wrote the book about the necessity to cut off Europe from the Russian pipelines.



"This book, written in 1987, goes a long way in explaining the context for the NordStream sabotage of 26 September 2022."

You have to be completely re1arded to not be able to connect the dots here.


Sounds like you are re1arded because you keep asking

Another smart and informative contribution by dajo.


If you want to accuse the U.S. of something then just do it. Nobody cares about that story other than you and the rest of the America haters here.

Nobody cares about Nordstream, the biggest act of state terror on infrastructure in European history??
How soon we forget WW1, WW2, Napoleon, Genghis Khan, etc.
Pffftttt

What European infrastructure did Genghis Khan destroy? No circumstantial evidence. Please provide photos.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

dajo9 said:

When Hitler flooded the Berlin subways killing 10,000 Berliners was that state sponsored terrorism?
Not sure how you arrived at this topic, but you could argue that Hitler's flood was Putin's inspiration for destroying the Kakhovka Dam but it's more comparable to Russia's destruction of a dam in Ukraine in 1941 when it was on the run from Hitler.

Those two dam destructions by Stalin I and Stalin II (or whatever name Putin will take when he declares Russia an empire) were arguably the largest acts of state-sponsored terrorism, depending of course on how you view 9/11.


9/11 is out of bounds. The allegation was in regards to Europe. Also, 9/11 was not state sponsored. There is no room for conspiracy theories on these boards.
Sorry, like I said, I didn't have context on the conversation. If you are just talking about Europe, than sure 9/11 is irrelevant.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

dajo9 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

dajo9 said:

When Hitler flooded the Berlin subways killing 10,000 Berliners was that state sponsored terrorism?
Not sure how you arrived at this topic, but you could argue that Hitler's flood was Putin's inspiration for destroying the Kakhovka Dam but it's more comparable to Russia's destruction of a dam in Ukraine in 1941 when it was on the run from Hitler.

Those two dam destructions by Stalin I and Stalin II (or whatever name Putin will take when he declares Russia an empire) were arguably the largest acts of state-sponsored terrorism, depending of course on how you view 9/11.


9/11 is out of bounds. The allegation was in regards to Europe. Also, 9/11 was not state sponsored. There is no room for conspiracy theories on these boards.
Sorry, like I said, I didn't have context on the conversation. If you are just talking about Europe, than sure 9/11 is irrelevant.
No problem. We're just trying to figure out if Biden is worse than Hitler, Napoleon (or his Russian adversaries), and Genghis Khan. You know - normal stuff.
Lets Go Brandon 19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You know you're on the right side when the U.S. has to spend money to create propaganda to justify their actions.
https://www.leefang.com/p/us-funds-ukraine-groups-censoring



Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

dajo9 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

dajo9 said:

When Hitler flooded the Berlin subways killing 10,000 Berliners was that state sponsored terrorism?
Not sure how you arrived at this topic, but you could argue that Hitler's flood was Putin's inspiration for destroying the Kakhovka Dam but it's more comparable to Russia's destruction of a dam in Ukraine in 1941 when it was on the run from Hitler.

Those two dam destructions by Stalin I and Stalin II (or whatever name Putin will take when he declares Russia an empire) were arguably the largest acts of state-sponsored terrorism, depending of course on how you view 9/11.


9/11 is out of bounds. The allegation was in regards to Europe. Also, 9/11 was not state sponsored. There is no room for conspiracy theories on these boards.
Sorry, like I said, I didn't have context on the conversation. If you are just talking about Europe, than sure 9/11 is irrelevant.
No problem. We're just trying to figure out if Biden is worse than Hitler, Napoleon (or his Russian adversaries), and Genghis Khan. You know - normal stuff.
Obviously, Biden is worse than all of those brutal authoritarian nationalists.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:


If you want to accuse the U.S. of something then just do it. Nobody cares about that story other than you and the rest of the America haters here.

Nobody cares about Nordstream, the biggest act of state terror on infrastructure in European history??
How soon we forget WW1, WW2, Napoleon, Genghis Khan, etc.

Do you understand the difference between an act of state terror on infrastructure and world wars?

Never wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty and the pig likes it. Instead, you poke 'em.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

When Hitler flooded the Berlin subways killing 10,000 Berliners was that state sponsored terrorism?


I don't think so. Did the MUTOs attack Europe, or was it spared on their way to San Francisco?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

Was Moscow considered infrastructure or was 1812 Moscow not up to the standards of what we would consider to be "infrastructure"?


Is that why the Biden left all of our weapons to the Taliban in our messy Afghanistan withdrawal ? We simply did not want to commit an act of terrorism by blowing them up? Is that another reason why actual terrorists are using U.S. weapons?


I have inside information that some of the military trucks, new rifles, weapons, etc., were thoroughly destroyed in a multi-step process prior to our departure. This was relayed to me as the pullout was being planned. I have yet to read about it.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Given your handle, I hope you frequent the Falafel Drive In, founded by Palestinian Catholics. World-famous falafel and wonderful Moroccan chili sauce.

P.S. The founder, now deceased (RIP), was a policeman in Palestine before farming pigs.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

dajo9 said:

When Hitler flooded the Berlin subways killing 10,000 Berliners was that state sponsored terrorism?
Not sure how you arrived at this topic, but you could argue that Hitler's flood was Putin's inspiration for destroying the Kakhovka Dam but it's more comparable to Russia's destruction of a dam in Ukraine in 1941 when it was on the run from Hitler.

Those two dam destructions by Stalin I and Stalin II (or whatever name Putin will take when he declares Russia an empire) were arguably the largest acts of state-sponsored terrorism, depending of course on how you view 9/11.


Ukraine was the party that bombed the Khakhovka dam. They did that in order to clear their attack on the left bank of the Dniepr in the Kherson area, in Krinky and other regions. Had they not done that, the Russians could have just opened the sluice gates upstream and drowned any invading force.

While Ukraine did have strategic reasons to bomb the dam, they could have easily bombed it just out of pure spite, the same way they have constantly bombed Donetsk, the largest city in the Donbass/ They are also currently trying to bomb the Zaparozhie nuclear power plant once again, occupied by Russia for the last 2 years, because the NATO lugenpresse will always be able to sell the notion that the Russians are bombing their own infrastructure, because that's what Russians do...

Your buddy Gerashchenko, the founder of the infamous Myrotvorets Ukainian kill list, which includes dozens of journalists and dozens of children whose only crime was to vacation in Russian Crimea, boasted about Ukraine blowing up the dam on his Telegram channel. Even the WaPo acknowledged that Ukraine bombed the dam with HIMARS last year:

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russian massive missile attack wipes out Ukrainian capital Kyiv's main power plant

Trypilska Thermal Power Plant served as the primary electricity supplier for the Kyiv, Cherkasy, and Zhytomyr oblasts, worsening the situation with the energy crisis in Ukraine.

https://euromaidanpress.com/2024/04/11/russian-massive-missile-attack-wipes-out-ukrainian-capital-kyivs-main-power-plant/

Other Twitter posts claim Ukraine is out of Patriot missiles.


Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

movielover said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Palestinian Chicken said:



As long as we're indulging in 40 year old conspiracy theories, do you have any about the Hindenburg? Surely we must have used HAARP to induce a thunderstorm over New Jersey and get lightning to set the blimp on fire. This then greased the skids for the US to take sides in WW2.

Who blew up Nordstream?
I'm sure Germany can figure it out

The Scholtz government somehow can't seem to figure it out, neither do the Swedes or Danes.


1. What world power's president said they would do it?
2. What world power benefitted by selling more LNG at inflated prices?
3. What world power has such sway w the EU and NATO, nobody squaks?
4. What functionaries gloated about it?
5. Who did Seymour Hersh reveal as the culprit?

Same answer for all five.

Blinken as well was obsessed with Nordstream - he literally wrote the book about the necessity to cut off Europe from the Russian pipelines.



"This book, written in 1987, goes a long way in explaining the context for the NordStream sabotage of 26 September 2022."

You have to be completely re1arded to not be able to connect the dots here.


Sounds like you are re1arded because you keep asking

Another smart and informative contribution by dajo.


If you want to accuse the U.S. of something then just do it. Nobody cares about that story other than you and the rest of the America haters here.

Nobody cares about Nordstream, the biggest act of state terror on infrastructure in European history??
How soon we forget WW1, WW2, Napoleon, Genghis Khan, etc.

Do you understand the difference between an act of state terror on infrastructure and world wars?
So you think large scale wars don't destroy infrastructure on a far larger scale than Nordstream?
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

movielover said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Palestinian Chicken said:



As long as we're indulging in 40 year old conspiracy theories, do you have any about the Hindenburg? Surely we must have used HAARP to induce a thunderstorm over New Jersey and get lightning to set the blimp on fire. This then greased the skids for the US to take sides in WW2.

Who blew up Nordstream?
I'm sure Germany can figure it out

The Scholtz government somehow can't seem to figure it out, neither do the Swedes or Danes.


1. What world power's president said they would do it?
2. What world power benefitted by selling more LNG at inflated prices?
3. What world power has such sway w the EU and NATO, nobody squaks?
4. What functionaries gloated about it?
5. Who did Seymour Hersh reveal as the culprit?

Same answer for all five.

Blinken as well was obsessed with Nordstream - he literally wrote the book about the necessity to cut off Europe from the Russian pipelines.



"This book, written in 1987, goes a long way in explaining the context for the NordStream sabotage of 26 September 2022."

You have to be completely re1arded to not be able to connect the dots here.


Sounds like you are re1arded because you keep asking

Another smart and informative contribution by dajo.


If you want to accuse the U.S. of something then just do it. Nobody cares about that story other than you and the rest of the America haters here.

Nobody cares about Nordstream, the biggest act of state terror on infrastructure in European history??
How soon we forget WW1, WW2, Napoleon, Genghis Khan, etc.
Pffftttt

What European infrastructure did Genghis Khan destroy? No circumstantial evidence. Please provide photos.
You may have me there. I did find some contemporary photos, but at the 2 pixel black and white camera technology back then, the photos looked like abstract crossword puzzles.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russia is taking advantage of the GOP's blockade on Ukraine aid to destroy as much Ukrainian civilian infrastructure as possible including power plants and natural gas fields and facilities (eg state-sponsored terror).

Unfortunately, Putin has been able to continue to receive support from Iran, China and NK and leverage his high ROI spend controlling the GOP here to tie our hands. Gotta give him credit - he was right to target the GOP and Trump.

They are doing so in hopes that it will cause Ukraine to surrender so that they can erase its existence permanently. They aren't just looking for Crimea or the Donbas, they want it all as was obviously the goal from the start when they thought they could take Kyiv in 3 days.

Some of you may recall not long ago when the Putin shills used to pretend that Russia was operating a "special military operation" in order to defend itself against make believe Ukrainian aggression, which had never occurred and was not going to occur. Now those same people have to square those lies with the fact that they now support regime change and Russia's proposed annexation of Ukraine into Russia. And of course they will do the same for the next territory that Putin targets.

As I have said and demonstrated, Putin doesn't believe Ukrainian are a people or that Ukraine is entitled to sovereignty. All of the other fairy tales like denazification and protection of russiaphones he used to justify this stupid war were pretext and lies.

Maybe Mike Johnson will be ousted or the GOP will change direction to enable Ukraine aid when they realize the consequences of their inaction on our international standing but no one should hold their breath.
First Page Last Page
Page 241 of 284
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.