philly1121 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

Haloski said:

---

Internet Operative Log For Glory of Mother Russia:

Today is day 1050 of 3 for me at internet Siberia post Bear Insider. I have spent the last 3 years (out of 3 days) providing information to the same 7 individual posters and an additional one that has seemed to have roughly as many screen names as days that have passed. Some of the group seem to be interested in football, though they in general don't have much to talk about. Of interest lately was defection of a field general to another university in Indiana. Antics like those they speak of him engaging in would be met with a balcony visit in Mother Russia. There is an interesting fellow who is obsessed with young women in yoga pants who talks to himself in his own thread. He is a curious fellow. The university also apparently has a men's basketball team, but nobody speaks of them.

Oh well, it's time for me to get back to work. I am grateful for ChatCCCP as it saves me much time. I believe I will post picture of Moscow's beautiful metro station today. Those never get old.

I miss my family. I can't believe that this is what I am doing with my time on this planet but know that I'm making a big difference.

Viva Putin and GO BEARS (I refer to the Moscow Circus here)!

---

The only way he is so brainwashed into thinking he is on a 3 day mission if he listens to Philly's shilled nato propaganda and somehow has no communication with his military leaders. I highly doubt that.

---

Make glorious Mother Russia, 003. You're doing great.

---

This is not Rocky 4, it's a cynical old-fashioned geopolitical power play with so many bonuses for those pulling the strings - billion dollar side deals, MIC thriving, new LNG markets, trillions in lithium and black earth, and a shot at the ultimate prize, Russia's $80 trillion resources. All of this made possible with Ukrainian blood and US taxpayer treasure, what's not to love, no skin off their backs.

88 isn't as cynical as he would have us believe. He appears to be a true believer. He is either invested in the Russian economy or is vying for Influencer of the Month in the GRU Social Media Wing. Either way, I'm not sure Vladimir is getting quality money from his investment.

philly1121 said:

---

88 isn't as cynical as he would have us believe. He appears to be a true believer. He is either invested in the Russian economy or is vying for Influencer of the Month in the GRU Social Media Wing. Either way, I'm not sure Vladimir is getting quality money from his investment.

---

Please tell me Biden pays you. That is the only way your actions make sense.

oski003 said:

---

philly1121 said:

---

88 isn't as cynical as he would have us believe. He appears to be a true believer. He is either invested in the Russian economy or is vying for Influencer of the Month in the GRU Social Media Wing. Either way, I'm not sure Vladimir is getting quality money from his investment.

---

Please tell me Biden pays you. That is the only way your actions make sense.

---

See the other thread. You're taking my lines. I don't get paid by Joe or anyone else to debate your lazy research and fealty to Trump. Honestly, if you think the 2020 election was rigged, then I would like to sell you a bridge in Brooklyn. That's how bent you are. Were you at the capital on Jan 6th, 2021?

philly1121 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

philly1121 said:

---

88 isn't as cynical as he would have us believe. He appears to be a true believer. He is either invested in the Russian economy or is vying for Influencer of the Month in the GRU Social Media Wing. Either way, I'm not sure Vladimir is getting quality money from his investment.

---

Please tell me Biden pays you. That is the only way your actions make sense.

---

See the other thread. You're taking my lines. I don't get paid by Joe or anyone else to debate your lazy research and fealty to Trump. Honestly, if you think the 2020 election was rigged, then I would like to sell you a bridge in Brooklyn. That's how bent you are. Were you at the capital on Jan 6th, 2021?

---

Wow, you are the first person here to accuse people of getting paid to post? You are one of a kind!

Ukraine set to receive mid/late versions Mirage 2000s fighter jets from France this winter, the best jets they will have used to date

The French Mirage 2000-5F fighter jets, which are set to join the Ukrainian Air Force, are an advanced variant of the Mirage 2000 series, produced by Dassault Aviation in France‼️

Here are some detailed specifics about these jets‼️

- Design and Role‼️
The Mirage 2000-5F is a… pic.twitter.com/PEprwoz2k3

— Ven Doe (@XsyLocke) January 5, 2025

philly1121 said:

---

History Legends. Another pro-Russian youtuber. Dude is likely Serbian. Name is Alexandre Robert. Lives in Quebec.Makes many clickbait videos about how Russia is gaining ground. Limited to no knowledge about military strategy and movements and doesn't really understand what he is seeing or how to report it. Looks like he gets most of his info from Twitter and Telegram. Unreliable.

---

Does Alexandre Robert sound Serbian to you?? Do you speak any foreign languages?

Robert is French, and his coverage of the Ukraine war has been remarkably good, spot on throughout. His lighthearted approach in his humor and editorial takes belies a lot of rigor in his war analyses. He did cover the episodes where the Russians took some Ls, such as in the retreats from Kherson and the north, the sinking of the Moskva, botched early attacks on Ugledar or the early advances into Kursk, so he's not biased towards Russian. He only comes across as pro-Russian because the Russians' Ls have been few and far between in the last 3 years.

Again, do some research. By most of the comments on his videos as well as twitter posters, he is Serbian. Living in Quebec. Any person that has seen and heard his videos knows he has a Serbian accent, and at minimum, he is from the Balkans. He also has a Pintrest account under the name alexRS1818. Alex - if that's really his first name. RS stands for Republica Srpska (located in Bosnia/Herzogovina). 1818 stands for the date that Kraguljevac became the capitol of serbia after the ottoman empire left. Belgrade later became the new capital.

BearGoggles said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

philly1121 said:

---

Again, do some research. By most of the comments on his videos as well as twitter posters, he is Serbian. Living in Quebec. Any person that has seen and heard his videos knows he has a Serbian accent, and at minimum, he is from the Balkans. He also has a Pintrest account under the name alexRS1818. Alex - if that's really his first name. RS stands for Republica Srpska (located in Bosnia/Herzogovina). 1818 stands for the date that Kraguljevac became the capitol of serbia after the ottoman empire left. Belgrade later became the new capital.

---

Imagine me arguing, then doubling down, that some guy named Bob Johnson who speaks English flawlessly with no accent is Serbian - that's where we are here.

He has French videos and interviews, speaks like a native, and has a Linkedin page that lists his language skills. He lives in Quebec but has zero Quebecois accent, he is French.
https://ca.linkedin.com/in/alexandre-robert-275532165

---

I don't care what his nationality is. It is irrelevant.

I do care what his credentials are to be a respected opinion on war, history, political science, etc. And he literally has none. He's a software engineer (apparently 30 years old or so) who also self identifies as a historian.

Searching the internet (briefly) suggests he just a guy with lot of opinions but not any actual academic research or, for that matter, credentials/training as a historian. He is of course entitled to his opinion, but there is no reason it should be given any special credence.

This is just another example of your citing an opinion you agree with as if the source of the opinion is credible or worthy of consideration. Pure silliness and completely discrediting to you.

---

I notice you have nothing to say about the content itself of this or other videos about Ukraine, this is a pure ad hominem attack based on appeal to authority.

Alexandre Robert has earned his credentials in the marketplace of citizen-journalism, he has 700k subs despite his channel being demonetized and not boosted by the Youtube algorithm. His work reflects an enormous time investment into following, transcribing and analyzing almost in real time OSINT sources mostly on Telegram, where there is a huge volume of real time war content.

His work also reflects an excellent knowledge of military history, he often references and weaves in historical aspects about the Ukraine war from WW2, the Napoleonic wars and other historical conflicts into his analyses.

His takes on the Ukraine war and predictions have proven to be consistently correct, unlike those of most NATO-aligned experts, people like the Fox News and Sunday morning show generals, like Gens. Jack Keane, Keith Kellogg etc, or experts and former officials like Timothy Snyder, Barry Posen, Kasparov, Kagan, Kristol etc. The formers' takes are driven by their close (economic) association with the MIC, while the latter are more motivated by their neocon dogmas and cultural hubris, baggage which someone like Robert doesn't have.

Typical gaslighting from "leading, highly credentialed experts", Blungold favorite Snyder:

"This is unpleasant for us but if we don’t see it, we’re never going to—they see Capitol Hill as the shortest route to Kyiv. That’s how they see it and we have yet to prove them wrong. They are counting on Mike Johnson and Trump to get them them through."https://t.co/81PLDcdFNR pic.twitter.com/3WYzkWGXJ4

— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) March 15, 2024

^There are about a dozen straight-up lies in Snyder's 2min statement above, he has an ideologically-driven agenda and interest in pushing his NATO/MIC-driven narrative.


Robert's takes, very often completely opposite the alternative ideologically-driven narratives of hacks like Snyder, are largely apolitical and much more focused on the tactical and military aspects of the war. They align with those of neutral military experts like Austrian army Col. Markus Reisner, Swiss Col. Jacques Baud and US Col. Macgregor and Davis, among others.

Once again, there is hardly anything in his content that you would be able to identify as lacking in terms of his research and takes on this conflict, beyond his millennial editing style.

BearGoggles said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

philly1121 said:

---

Again, do some research. By most of the comments on his videos as well as twitter posters, he is Serbian. Living in Quebec. Any person that has seen and heard his videos knows he has a Serbian accent, and at minimum, he is from the Balkans. He also has a Pintrest account under the name alexRS1818. Alex - if that's really his first name. RS stands for Republica Srpska (located in Bosnia/Herzogovina). 1818 stands for the date that Kraguljevac became the capitol of serbia after the ottoman empire left. Belgrade later became the new capital.

---

Imagine me arguing, then doubling down, that some guy named Bob Johnson who speaks English flawlessly with no accent is Serbian - that's where we are here.

He has French videos and interviews, speaks like a native, and has a Linkedin page that lists his language skills. He lives in Quebec but has zero Quebecois accent, he is French.
https://ca.linkedin.com/in/alexandre-robert-275532165

---

I don't care what his nationality is. It is irrelevant.

I do care what his credentials are to be a respected opinion on war, history, political science, etc. And he literally has none. He's a software engineer (apparently 30 years old or so) who also self identifies as a historian.

Searching the internet (briefly) suggests he just a guy with lot of opinions but not any actual academic research or, for that matter, credentials/training as a historian. He is of course entitled to his opinion, but there is no reason it should be given any special credence.

This is just another example of your citing an opinion you agree with as if the source of the opinion is credible or worthy of consideration. Pure silliness and completely discrediting to you.

---

I notice you have nothing to say about the content itself of this or other videos about Ukraine, this is a pure ad hominem attack based on appeal to authority.

Alexandre Robert has earned his credentials in the marketplace of citizen-journalism, he has 700k subs despite his channel being demonetized and not boosted by the Youtube algorithm. His work reflects an enormous time investment into following, transcribing and analyzing almost in real time OSINT sources mostly on Telegram, where there is a huge volume of real time war content.

His work also reflects an excellent knowledge of military history, he often references and weaves in historical aspects about the Ukraine war from WW2, the Napoleonic wars and other historical conflicts into his analyses.

His takes on the Ukraine war and predictions have proven to be consistently correct, unlike those of most NATO-aligned experts, people like the Fox News and Sunday morning show generals, like Gens. Jack Keane, Keith Kellogg etc, or experts and former officials like Timothy Snyder, Barry Posen, Kasparov, Kagan, Kristol etc. The formers' takes are driven by their close (economic) association with the MIC, while the latter are more motivated by their neocon dogmas and cultural hubris, baggage which someone like Robert doesn't have.

Typical gaslighting from "leading, highly credentialed experts", Blungold favorite Snyder:

"This is unpleasant for us but if we don’t see it, we’re never going to—they see Capitol Hill as the shortest route to Kyiv. That’s how they see it and we have yet to prove them wrong. They are counting on Mike Johnson and Trump to get them them through."https://t.co/81PLDcdFNR pic.twitter.com/3WYzkWGXJ4

— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) March 15, 2024

^There are about a dozen straight-up lies in Snyder's 2min statement above, he has an ideologically-driven agenda and interest in pushing his NATO/MIC-driven narrative.


Robert's takes, very often completely opposite the alternative ideologically-driven narratives of hacks like Snyder, are largely apolitical and much more focused on the tactical and military aspects of the war. They align with those of neutral military experts like Austrian army Col. Markus Reisner, Swiss Col. Jacques Baud and US Col. Macgregor and Davis, among others.

Once again, there is hardly anything in his content that you would be able to identify as lacking in terms of his research and takes on this conflict, beyond his millennial editing style.

---

Pointing out that a person is lacking in credentials, academic training, and expertise on a subject matter to point out their views are not deserving of deference is not ad hominin. It is saying their views are not historical, but rather mostly ill informed opinion.

And, as stated in my original post, I'm not engaging with his views because I don't care what they are and they pretty clearly seemed to be opinions, not facts.

---

They're not "opinions", they are analyses and conclusions based on the facts he is presenting.

When you put his videos next to those of a Tim Snyder, it is the latter that clearly comes across as opinionated, his main schtick consists in force-fitting the Ukraine war into a morality tale that is completely discredited by the facts on the ground, which Robert does a good job of presenting.

Quote:

---

And in terms of "earned his credentials in the marketplace of citizen-journalism" with lots of followers . . . that is just a vapid standard (which admittedly you fully endorse). I would call it the Kardashianisation of logic. There are racists, neo nazis and white nationalist on twitter with similarly large followings. Kanye West has 30M+ followers. Should I give credence to their views? Of course not.

---

He didn't earn his credentials by having a big ass, a reality show and lots of plastic surgery, or by being a rap star. He earned his following by providing coherent, accurate and insightful journalism as a modern day war correspondant.

A novice on this topic, I was scrambling for information several years ago and independent of Cal88 ran into this fellow. He struck me as authentic, knowledgeable, and funny, and my guess was that he had a greybeard or two assisting him. But it was possible he was a funded propagandist.

This was dispelled when he pointed out Russia mistakes and losses.

Along the way I discovered Colonel McGregor, Scott Ritter, Jeffrey Sachs, John Mearsheimer, Cal88 and others. (Yes, Lord Bebop looks like a Russian troll.)

I still look for my own angles to corroborate their analysis. McGregor and others claimed Ukraine was suffering massive losses. An internal leak confirmed the historically lopsided loss ratio. I then started reading the Kiev Independent online, and they were listing their interviewed soldiers as being 38, 45, 48, 53 years old. Which confirmed what McGregor and others claimed. I posted it a few places, and the KI stopped listing soldiers ages.

NATO head Rutte

🇷🇺If you look at what Russia produces now in three months, then this is what the whole of NATO from Los Angeles to Ankara produces in a whole year
— Mark Rutte pic.twitter.com/ZB6MrOMrnn

— DD Geopolitics (@DD_Geopolitics) January 13, 2025

philly1121 said:

---

wow that's so great 88, 34, 003 or Goggles or whoever you're faking. Know what that means to me? D**k

It is hilarious watching all of you post about Hunter and Joe and Ukraine and all this nonsense when he has 6 days to go. If I just post enough. If I just post enough twitter posts, this will convince everyone and we will have our victory! lol You got your election victory. You're not touching Joe. You're not touching Hunter. Go ask for that missing $5 millie back from Trump. sorrynotsorry

---

This is definitely a post from a stable genius. Stay well.