The Official Russian Invasion of Ukraine Thread

1,520,330 Views | 11929 Replies | Last: 25 min ago by sycasey
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 12:26a, 3/15/25
movielover said:
NATO is mass producing Pride tshirts as we speak!
I want one.
Reply Quote
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:16a, 3/15/25
Reply Quote
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bear2034 • 9:02a, 3/15/25
The troops that want to surrender often can't, Ukrainian squads being staffed with banderist commissars.

It seems though that the Ukrainians sent in some of their better, more motivated troops into Kursk, including a contingent of NATO advisers. Dozens if not hundreds of NATO troops are trapped in the Kursk pocket, same situation as in Mariupol earlier in the war.
Reply Quote
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 9:42a, 3/15/25
Talk about a high risk mission.
Reply Quote
tequila4kapp
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 1:15p, 3/15/25
Cal88 said:
The troops that want to surrender often can't, Ukrainian squads being staffed with banderist commissars.

It seems though that the Ukrainians sent in some of their better, more motivated troops into Kursk, including a contingent of NATO advisers. Dozens if not hundreds of NATO troops are trapped in the Kursk pocket, same situation as in Mariupol earlier in the war.
It is completely unreasonable to demand surrender as a condition of ceasefire. Ceasefires are meant to maintain the tactical status quo while giving the sides space to negotiate a long term solution. This is a laughably unserious offer by Putin. A normal response would be to threaten a substantial allied response which aids Ukraine by a date certain if that term isn't withdrawn and the ceasefire agreed to.
Reply Quote
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to tequila4kapp • 1:55p, 3/15/25
tequila4kapp said:
Cal88 said:
The troops that want to surrender often can't, Ukrainian squads being staffed with banderist commissars.

It seems though that the Ukrainians sent in some of their better, more motivated troops into Kursk, including a contingent of NATO advisers. Dozens if not hundreds of NATO troops are trapped in the Kursk pocket, same situation as in Mariupol earlier in the war.
It is completely unreasonable to demand surrender as a condition of ceasefire. Ceasefires are meant to maintain the tactical status quo while giving the sides space to negotiate a long term solution. This is a laughably unserious offer by Putin. A normal response would be to threaten a substantial allied response which aids Ukraine by a date certain if that term isn't withdrawn and the ceasefire agreed to.


Do you want to wait for the ceasefire to begin after those trapped troops are killed?
Reply Quote
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:30p, 3/15/25
Reply Quote
tequila4kapp
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 4:10p, 3/15/25
oski003 said:
tequila4kapp said:
Cal88 said:
The troops that want to surrender often can't, Ukrainian squads being staffed with banderist commissars.

It seems though that the Ukrainians sent in some of their better, more motivated troops into Kursk, including a contingent of NATO advisers. Dozens if not hundreds of NATO troops are trapped in the Kursk pocket, same situation as in Mariupol earlier in the war.
It is completely unreasonable to demand surrender as a condition of ceasefire. Ceasefires are meant to maintain the tactical status quo while giving the sides space to negotiate a long term solution. This is a laughably unserious offer by Putin. A normal response would be to threaten a substantial allied response which aids Ukraine by a date certain if that term isn't withdrawn and the ceasefire agreed to.


Do you want to wait for the ceasefire to begin after those trapped troops are killed?
Putin could ask for those troops to retreat beyond a particular line. Or they could retain existing positions with no reinforcements/ resupply allowed.
Reply Quote
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to tequila4kapp • 4:52p, 3/15/25
tequila4kapp said:
oski003 said:
tequila4kapp said:
Cal88 said:
The troops that want to surrender often can't, Ukrainian squads being staffed with banderist commissars.

It seems though that the Ukrainians sent in some of their better, more motivated troops into Kursk, including a contingent of NATO advisers. Dozens if not hundreds of NATO troops are trapped in the Kursk pocket, same situation as in Mariupol earlier in the war.
It is completely unreasonable to demand surrender as a condition of ceasefire. Ceasefires are meant to maintain the tactical status quo while giving the sides space to negotiate a long term solution. This is a laughably unserious offer by Putin. A normal response would be to threaten a substantial allied response which aids Ukraine by a date certain if that term isn't withdrawn and the ceasefire agreed to.


Do you want to wait for the ceasefire to begin after those trapped troops are killed?
Putin could ask for those troops to retreat beyond a particular line. Or they could retain existing positions with no reinforcements/ resupply allowed.


Neither are practical in a cease fire. Those troops are trapped behind enemy lines. The first option would be a Russian concession that would require a NATO concession. The second option is silly.
Reply Quote
socaltownie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:21p, 3/15/25
Credible sources say the whole "they are surrounded" is agitprop. Coming from verified third party sources.
Reply Quote
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to socaltownie • 9:40p, 3/15/25
socaltownie said:
Credible sources say the whole "they are surrounded" is agitprop. Coming from verified third party sources.

90% of the Kursk expeditionary force is already dead, the remaining 7,000, including many NATO officers, are now trapped. That is why Trump pleaded Putin to spare their lives.

Reply Quote
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Fauci Lied People Died • 1:15p, 3/16/25
There is a time to fight
A time to grift
A time to do lines
And a time to say bye bye

The latter has superceded the former
The Walls are closing in
The pawns are resting forever
The Natives are restless for peace

Your daughter's are taking up with men from far away lands
Your planned conscripts are fighting back
Europe a toothless consiglieri
The Merchants of War have no answers

The Power Brokers are at hand
The Emissaries are top notch
Yet the Globalists seek more blood
It is time to say bye bye
Reply Quote
1 edit
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:48p, 3/16/25
Reply Quote
Eastern Oregon Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 1:54p, 3/16/25
Cal88 said:
socaltownie said:
Credible sources say the whole "they are surrounded" is agitprop. Coming from verified third party sources.

90% of the Kursk expeditionary force is already dead, the remaining 7,000, including many NATO officers, are now trapped. That is why Trump pleaded Putin to spare their lives.

Funny how you decided to use that tweet when it has context at the bottom that states that the tweeted front page from the Hull Daily Mail is a fake. Sure enough, if you follow the provided link, there's nothing about Kursk or Ukraine on the real Hull Daily Mail front page. Odd choice. I've never even heard of the Hull Daily Mail before. Then again, you posted fake magazine covers to prove there was some 1970s cabal about global cooling that somehow therefore invalidated the evidence about global warming. You're nothing if not consistent.
Reply Quote
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Eastern Oregon Bear • 3:16p, 3/16/25
70,000 is a good estimate of the Ukrainian losses in the ill-fated Kursk offensive, so what was surprising here is that this fact would be published in a British paper, not the figure itself. If the cover is in fact not real, the statement in that cover is.
Reply Quote
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:16a, 3/17/25


Reply Quote
1 edit
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:37a, 3/17/25
Lazy, hot Ukrainians.

Reply Quote
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:51a, 3/17/25


Reply Quote
1 edit
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:08a, 3/18/25
BJ brings up the Ukrainian nationalists, conveniently forgetting his key role in early 2022 scuttling the Istanbul Accords.

Reply Quote
SBGold Has Terminal TDS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 2:26p, 3/18/25


https://media1.tenor.com/m/ca0S_LjritkAAAAC/shoshanna-laughing.gif
Reply Quote
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:59p, 3/18/25
Putin when he got off the phone with Trump:

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Reply Quote
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 3:03p, 3/18/25
movielover said:

Putin: "we are sympathetic to President Trump's call to be guided by humanitarian considerations..."





Reply Quote
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:04p, 3/18/25
Russia is in a significantly stronger position than three years ago, and Zenensky won't compromise and seems scatter-brained.

I believe Scott Ritter said Zelensky will be gone in two weeks. We'll see.

If the war drags on, do Ukrainians in America return home? Does Russia take Odessa?
Reply Quote
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 3:07p, 3/18/25
movielover said:
Russia is in a significantly stronger position than three years ago, and Zenensky won't compromise and seems scatter-brained.

I believe Scott Ritter said Zelensky will be gone in two weeks. We'll see.

If the war drags on, do Ukrainians in America return home? Does Russia take Odessa?

You mean the SAME Scott Ritter that is a regular contributor to RT and Sputnik?

The same Scott Ritter that was convicted of several criminal offenses after engaging in sexually explicit online activity (exposing himself) with a police officer who was posing as a 15 year old girl?

You mean THAT Scott Ritter?
Reply Quote
3 edits
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 4:28p, 3/18/25
Yes, we've already covered the likely C-A targeting of Ritter before.

The same men, Ritter, and MacGregor, that predicted hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians would be killed in our unwinnable proxy war. That the longer the war dragged on, the more land Ukraine would lose.
Reply Quote
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:46p, 3/18/25
Reply Quote
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 8:59a, 3/19/25
movielover said:
Yes, we've already covered the likely C-A targeting of Ritter before.

The same men, Ritter, and MacGregor, that predicted hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians would be killed in our unwinnable proxy war. That the longer the war dragged on, the more land Ukraine would lose.

He must be a real genius to have "forecasted" this.
Must be why he always appears on RT and Sputnik.

Simply amazing!
Reply Quote
1 edit
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 9:03a, 3/19/25

You might want to become better informed.

Trump Call With Zelensky About Russia-Ukraine War Is Underway, White House Says - The New York Times
Reply Quote
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:32a, 3/19/25
Reply Quote
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:42p, 3/19/25
Reply Quote
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 3:56p, 3/19/25
How many Russian soldiers did Col. MacGregor predict would die…..or was that on RT's list of topics not to discuss?

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Reply Quote
MinotStateBeav
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bearister • 10:50p, 3/19/25
bearister said:
How many Russian soldiers did Col. MacGregor predict would die…..or was that on RT's list of topics not to discuss?

Reply Quote
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bearister • 7:44a, 3/20/25
bearister said:
How many Russian soldiers did Col. MacGregor predict would die…..or was that on RT's list of topics not to discuss?


MacGregor is a military expert and an independent voice who has no problem criticizing Trump and his policies. He's not that popular among the Fox/neocon circles.

Reply Quote
Eastern Oregon Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 9:52a, 3/20/25
movielover said:
Yes, we've already covered the likely C-A targeting of Ritter before.

The same men, Ritter, and MacGregor, that predicted hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians would be killed in our unwinnable proxy war. That the longer the war dragged on, the more land Ukraine would lose.
Funny how you go on and on about Muslim grooming gangs and Muslim "gang ra*e", but you're OK with Scott Ritter exposing himself to what he thought was a 15 year old girl. It shows that your outrage is more politically based than it is based on morality.
Reply Quote
1 edit
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Eastern Oregon Bear • 10:24a, 3/20/25
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
movielover said:
Yes, we've already covered the likely C-A targeting of Ritter before.

The same men, Ritter, and MacGregor, that predicted hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians would be killed in our unwinnable proxy war. That the longer the war dragged on, the more land Ukraine would lose.
Funny how you go on and on about Muslim grooming gangs and Muslim "gang ra*e", but you're OK with Scott Ritter exposing himself to what he thought was a 15 year old girl. It shows that your outrage is more politically based than it is based on morality.


That is sick, but I assume Ritter served his time since that online incident happened 16 years ago. Hopefully, he is reformed.
Reply Quote
First Page Last Page
Page 324 of 342 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.