The Official Russian Invasion of Ukraine Thread

1,549,635 Views | 12277 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by movielover
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:



I am very skeptical that Russia would give up Crimea now or at that time.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

movielover said:



I am very skeptical that Russia would give up Crimea now or at that time.

Since your comment started a new page, I'm reposting this so that Hans' bullsh@it doesn't appear on a page looking like it didn't get rebutted.

"While there were direct talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul, including agreements on prisoner and war remains exchanges, they did not result in a ceasefire or a broader peace agreement. Both sides did agree to exchange 1,000 prisoners of war each, and to return the remains of 6,000 soldiers. However, negotiations on ending the war itself made little headway.

Key points about the Istanbul talks:
Prisoner and Remains Exchange:
A significant agreement was reached to exchange 1,000 prisoners of war from each side and return the remains of 6,000 soldiers.

No Ceasefire:
Despite discussions, a ceasefire agreement was not reached during the Istanbul talks.

Minimal Progress on Peace:
While the prisoner exchange was a positive step, little progress was made towards a broader resolution of the conflict.

Differing Expectations:
The talks were characterized by differing expectations and maximalist demands from both sides, particularly regarding Ukraine's potential neutrality and troop withdrawals."
AI Overview
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hungarian Conservative: Russia Ukraine Peace Was Blocked By Western Powers, Former Israeli Prime Minister Claims

"Still according to Bennett, PM Johnson was the most adamant about taking aggressive action against Putin. Scholz and Macron were exploring more pragmatic options, while Biden was in support of both approaches. The talks between the two belligerent sides seemed to be making some headway, with both parties making concessions. Putin vowed not to have Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy killed and to not demand disarmament from Ukraine; Zelenskyy agreed to not pursue NATO membership for his country, which was Putin's primary contention.

"At the same time, Russian and Ukrainian officials were engaging in a negotiation of their own in Gomel, Belarus. So, there seemed to be a very real chance for making peace in Eastern Europe again. However, the major Western NATO powers ultimately decided to end At the same time, Russian and Ukrainian officials were engaging in a negotiation of their own in Gomel, Belarus. So, there seemed to be a very real chance for making peace in Eastern Europe again. However, the major Western NATO powers ultimately decided to end negotiations because they 'decided it was necessary to continue to smash Putin,' as the former Israeli Prime Minister put it in his explosive interview....

"...the same article claims that the peace talks were halted by an impromptu visit to Kyiv by Boris Johnson."

https://www.hungarianconservative.com/articles/current/russia_ukraine-peace_blocked_western_powers_naftali_bennett_mediationraeli-prime-minister-claims/







Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

movielover said:




"While there were direct talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul, including agreements on prisoner and war remains exchanges, they did not result in a ceasefire or a broader peace agreement. Both sides did agree to exchange 1,000 prisoners of war each, and to return the remains of 6,000 soldiers. However, negotiations on ending the war itself made little headway.

Key points about the Istanbul talks:
Prisoner and Remains Exchange:
A significant agreement was reached to exchange 1,000 prisoners of war from each side and return the remains of 6,000 soldiers.

No Ceasefire:
Despite discussions, a ceasefire agreement was not reached during the Istanbul talks.

Minimal Progress on Peace:
While the prisoner exchange was a positive step, little progress was made towards a broader resolution of the conflict.

Differing Expectations:
The talks were characterized by differing expectations and maximalist demands from both sides, particularly regarding Ukraine's potential neutrality and troop withdrawals."
AI Overview



If we can get Zelenskyy, Putin and Donald J. Trump in a room together, this war will be over the day before Trump takes office!

Did you know Trump is such a great dealmaker that he actually wrote a book about it? Needless to say, it was a bestseller! I say "time to let this man operate and then we can award him the 'Noble' Prize"! It comes with a cash award, right? He will probably donate that to charity!
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

oski003 said:

movielover said:



I am very skeptical that Russia would give up Crimea now or at that time.

Since your comment started a new page, I'm reposting this so that Hans' bullsh@it doesn't appear on a page looking like it didn't get rebutted.

"While there were direct talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul, including agreements on prisoner and war remains exchanges, they did not result in a ceasefire or a broader peace agreement. Both sides did agree to exchange 1,000 prisoners of war each, and to return the remains of 6,000 soldiers. However, negotiations on ending the war itself made little headway.

Key points about the Istanbul talks:
Prisoner and Remains Exchange:
A significant agreement was reached to exchange 1,000 prisoners of war from each side and return the remains of 6,000 soldiers.

No Ceasefire:
Despite discussions, a ceasefire agreement was not reached during the Istanbul talks.

Minimal Progress on Peace:
While the prisoner exchange was a positive step, little progress was made towards a broader resolution of the conflict.

Differing Expectations:
The talks were characterized by differing expectations and maximalist demands from both sides, particularly regarding Ukraine's potential neutrality and troop withdrawals."
AI Overview




That is a gross mischaracterization. These AI capsules that you have been favoring lately are a compendium of MSM narratives, a lazy reach for confirmation bias. The Istanbul peace agreement was close to being signed. It was scuttled by NATO intervention, most notably Boris Johnson, working with the Kyiv nationalists.




^Nuland is gaslighting here, the Istanbul Peace Agreement restrictions on Ukrainian military deployments were a central part of the negotiation, not some buried annex.



Quote:

Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said in an interview posted to his YouTube channel on Saturday that the U.S. and its Western allies "blocked" his efforts of mediating between Russia and Ukraine to bring an end to the war in its early days.

On March 4, 2022, Bennett traveled to Russia to meet with President Vladimir Putin. In the interview, he detailed his mediation at the time between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, which he said he coordinated with the U.S., France, Germany, and the UK.

Bennett said that both sides agreed to major concessions during his mediation effort. For the Russian side, he said they dropped "denazification" as a requirement for a ceasefire. Bennett defined "denazification" as the removal of Zelensky. During his meeting in Moscow with Putin, Bennett said the Russian leader guaranteed that he wouldn't try to kill Zelensky.

The other concession Russia made, according to Bennett, is that it wouldn't seek the disarmament of Ukraine. For the Ukrainian side, Zelensky "renounced" that he would seek NATO membership, which Bennett said was the "reason" for Russia's invasion.

Reports at the time reflect Bennet's comments and said Russia and Ukraine were softening their positions. Citing Israeli officials, Axios reported on March 8 that Putin's "proposal is difficult for Zelensky to accept but not as extreme as they anticipated. They said the proposal doesn't include regime change in Kyiv and allows Ukraine to keep its sovereignty."

Discussing how Western leaders felt about his mediation efforts, Bennett said then-British Prime Minister Boris Johnson took an "aggressive line" while French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz were more "pragmatic." Bennett said President Biden adopted "both" positions.

But ultimately, the Western leaders opposed Bennet's efforts. "I'll say this in the broad sense. I think there was a legitimate decision by the West to keep striking Putin and not [negotiate]," Bennett said.

When asked if the Western powers "blocked" the mediation efforts, Bennet said,

Quote:

Basically, yes. They blocked it, and I thought they were wrong.





https://mronline.org/2023/02/07/former-israeli-pm-bennett-says-u-s-blocked-his-attempts-at-a-russia-ukraine-peace-deal/
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This comment isn't directed at you:
Before AI Overview, the usual suspects here would post some provocative MAGA bullsh@it and cite catturd, amuse or some other anonymous hack as the source.
I would spend time researching to find legitimate material to rebut the propaganda and then post it. The original poster would then drop some flippant one liner in response to my post.

Now with AI Overview:
It takes me 10 seconds or less to find a summary of 100+ articles that calls bullsh@t on amuse and catturd. If the original poster wants to spend the time pointing out the AI Overview is wrong, they can have at it like you did.

I can tell you that I won't post an AI Overview that isn't consistent with my understanding from my prior reading on the topic. I also look at the multiple sample sources they cite at the end of the AI Overview to see if they meet my credibility standards.

You call my sources unreliable MSM and I think your sources are often highly biased and outlier. We mostly disagree on things, but you are a gentleman and polite.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Trump is such a great dealmaker that he actually wrote a book about it?"

He not only has never written a book, he has never read one. If you asked him to name his favorite books he would go into more triple talk than Sarah Palin did when she was asked what newspapers she reads.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?


(recent pic of Boris Johnson vacationing in Greece)
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is why the East and South of Ukraine rebelled in 2014, and why the Donbas and Russia will never accept to be part of the current Ukrainian regime:

BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Russia asked / demanded negotiations over NATO entering Ukraine 5, 6, 7 times. We stiffed him.

We put 12 secret CIA bases on his border, expelled his diplomats under false terms, and openly talk about breaking her apart to plunder her wealth.

You skipped over my specific demands that the EU pay a price for pushing the destruction of Ukraine while she sits back and does little.

Poland took in millions of Ukrainians, but is now fed up? The elite crooks of Ukraine allegedly travel around Europe spending in gaudy fashion, angering the locals.

You ignore Ukraine's corruption.

Putin won slowly but convincingly.

Why do you seem so happy about this? Even if the US/Europe made all manner of mistakes as you claim, it is baffling you are "rootin for Putin". You display a lot more animosity to Ukraine and the USA than Putin.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Sick.

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearGoggles said:

movielover said:

Russia asked / demanded negotiations over NATO entering Ukraine 5, 6, 7 times. We stiffed him.

We put 12 secret CIA bases on his border, expelled his diplomats under false terms, and openly talk about breaking her apart to plunder her wealth.

You skipped over my specific demands that the EU pay a price for pushing the destruction of Ukraine while she sits back and does little.

Poland took in millions of Ukrainians, but is now fed up? The elite crooks of Ukraine allegedly travel around Europe spending in gaudy fashion, angering the locals.

You ignore Ukraine's corruption.

Putin won slowly but convincingly.

Why do you seem so happy about this? Even if the US/Europe made all manner of mistakes as you claim, it is baffling you are "rootin for Putin". You display a lot more animosity to Ukraine and the USA than Putin.



IMO, "winning" for Putin would have been toppling Ukraine's government and installing a more compliant leader. That's why he sent soldiers straight to Kiev at first, and no I don't buy the bulls**t excuses the Russians came out with later about it being a "feint" or whatever. They wanted the capital.

Ukraine did well to take that off the table pretty quickly. Russia would be settling for just some territory in the east, as much as it sucks to reward Putin at all.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Poked the Bear for 30 years. FAFO.

We've been losing needless wars since Vietnam. Ridiculous.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Real Ukrainian losses confirmed, the numbers are the same as those leaked by analysts like Col. Macgregor: over 1.7 million KIA/MIAs.




Quote:

According to the compromised digital registry, if the data is correct, Ukraine lost 1,721,000 troops killed or missing over three years of the conflict. The breakdown is:

118,500 in 2022
405,400 in 2023
595,000 in 2024
621,000 in 2025 the heaviest year yet


The losses got gradually heavier because most of the Ukrainian soldiers in the last two years were forced conscripts with poor/very shot combat training, with a higher rate of desertion and early death on the front, and because of growing Ukrainian weapons shortages.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
^^ Correction: shot --> short ^^

MacGregor also expands on the more recent heavy troop loss for Ukraine. This apparently also happened in WWII to the Germans as they collapsed, and other armies. Low on supplies, supply lines cut off, retreat, confusion, low morale, wounded not removed from the battlefield, etc.

At this rate, Ukraine could lose a million men this year.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Idiot MSNBC host now butt kissing Trump, trying to prolong the graft - $90 Billion - and bloodshed.

1. Ukraine's military is decimated
2. They're retreating
3. We don't have $90 Billion in military goods ready to send them, we're tapped out!

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Warpigs won't step up.

JackPosobiec
BREAKING: FRANCE AND THE UK ARE WALKING BACK REPORTS THAT THEY WILL PROVIDE MILITARY FORCES FOR PEACEKEEPING IN UKRAINE
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't worry, everyone! The Dilbert guy is on it!
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearGoggles said:

movielover said:

Russia asked / demanded negotiations over NATO entering Ukraine 5, 6, 7 times. We stiffed him.

We put 12 secret CIA bases on his border, expelled his diplomats under false terms, and openly talk about breaking her apart to plunder her wealth.

You skipped over my specific demands that the EU pay a price for pushing the destruction of Ukraine while she sits back and does little.

Poland took in millions of Ukrainians, but is now fed up? The elite crooks of Ukraine allegedly travel around Europe spending in gaudy fashion, angering the locals.

You ignore Ukraine's corruption.

Putin won slowly but convincingly.

Why do you seem so happy about this? Even if the US/Europe made all manner of mistakes as you claim, it is baffling you are "rootin for Putin". You display a lot more animosity to Ukraine and the USA than Putin.



IMO, "winning" for Putin would have been toppling Ukraine's government and installing a more compliant leader. That's why he sent soldiers straight to Kiev at first, and no I don't buy the bulls**t excuses the Russians came out with later about it being a "feint" or whatever. They wanted the capital.


You're basically right about this, Putin put together a large-scale offensive with the goal of regime change in Kiev. He didn't necessarily want a puppet regime, and would have been satisfied with a neutral government along the lines of post-war Austria or Finland that didn't regard the Russians as enemies and did not mistreat its large Russian minority.

The Banderist ideology with which the post-Maidan regime has been built is fundamentally flawed, that is a point you guys have never really acknowledged. You cannot have a government that considers SS leaders like Bandera as founding fathers.


map of the monuments, busts, plaques, and museums to Bandera

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-map-of-the-monuments-busts-plaques-and-museums-to-Bandera-Source-Designed-by-O_fig1_265341805

There was no way in the world that eastern and southern Ukrainians, whose grandparents fought the nazis in WW2 and suffered great losses, were ever going to put up with that kind of ideology, which treated them as hostile foreigners in their own country.

While monuments all across western Ukraine were being erected since 2014 glorifying Ukrainian WW2 nazis, WW2 monuments in memory of fallen local Soviet soldiers in eastern Ukraine were defaced, removed and WW2 veterans and their descendants were forbidden to hold ceremonies there... Casus belli

What you also miss is that this extremist naionalist ideology had been carefully cultivated in Ukraine by the US and NATO since the 1950s, culminating in the Maidan project of 2014.


sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

The Banderist ideology with which the post-Maidan regime has been built is fundamentally flawed, that is a point you guys have never really acknowledged. You cannot have a government that considers SS leaders like Bandera as founding fathers.

I'm sure such elements exist in Ukraine, but I don't buy that Nazism is a particularly significant piece of Ukrainian politics or government (as the Russian propagandists would like to claim) in the modern day. The first reason I don't buy it is that they elected a Jewish president.

Not interested in discussing this further, as I consider it a deflection from the core issues of the war.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

The Banderist ideology with which the post-Maidan regime has been built is fundamentally flawed, that is a point you guys have never really acknowledged. You cannot have a government that considers SS leaders like Bandera as founding fathers.

I'm sure such elements exist in Ukraine, but I don't buy that Nazism is a particularly significant piece of Ukrainian politics or government (as the Russian propagandists would like to claim) in the modern day. The first reason I don't buy it is that they elected a Jewish president.

Not interested in discussing this further, as I consider it a deflection from the core issues of the war.


It certainly is one of the core issues.

Several major thoroughfares across western and central Ukraine being renamed after Bandera, large statues in main city squares - those facts are not the reflection of a marginal movement.

Jewish oligarchs like Taruta or Kolomoyski, the figure who launched Zelensky's political career, actively funded far right militias. They toned down the antisemitism and ramped up the anti-Russian message. These militias provided the muscle to protect the oligarchs' interests, and militia leaders who were former soccer hooligans became millionaires.

Quote:

Before becoming part of Ukraine's armed forces, who funded Azov?

The unit received backing from Ukraine's interior minister in 2014, as the government had recognised its own military was too weak to fight off the pro-Russian separatists and relied on paramilitary volunteer forces.

These forces were privately funded by oligarchs the most known being Igor Kolomoisky, an energy magnate billionaire and then-governor of the Dnipropetrovska region.

In addition to Azov, Kolomoisky funded other volunteer battalions such as the Dnipro 1 and Dnipro 2, Aidar and Donbas units.

Azov received early funding and assistance from another oligarch: Serhiy Taruta, the billionaire governor of Donetsk region.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/1/who-are-the-azov-regiment
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

The Banderist ideology with which the post-Maidan regime has been built is fundamentally flawed, that is a point you guys have never really acknowledged. You cannot have a government that considers SS leaders like Bandera as founding fathers.

I'm sure such elements exist in Ukraine, but I don't buy that Nazism is a particularly significant piece of Ukrainian politics or government (as the Russian propagandists would like to claim) in the modern day. The first reason I don't buy it is that they elected a Jewish president.

Not interested in discussing this further, as I consider it a deflection from the core issues of the war.


It certainly is one of the core issues.

Several major thoroughfares across western and central Ukraine being renamed after Bandera, large statues in main city squares - those facts are not the reflection of a marginal movement.

Jewish oligarchs like Taruta or Kolomoyski, the figure who launched Zelensky's political career, actively funded far right militias. They toned down the antisemitism and ramped up the anti-Russian message. These militias provided the muscle to protect the oligarchs' interests, and militia leaders who were former soccer hooligans became millionaires.

Sounds like the Ukrainians have been so antagonized by Russia that even the Jewish community was willing to make common cause with these folks in the face of a common enemy. The solution to this was not for Russia to invade and fan the flames further.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our media has been obsessed by racism, and alleged racism, for decades. But then a pivotal racist group is partly funded by our government, follows a historic Nazi leader, and the story isn't exposed?

Because international reporters are that weak, and / or the CIA sidetracked them or buys them off / threatens them?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

movielover said:

There are hundreds of videos online showing Ukrainians being kidnapped off the street for warfare. Millions have fled. I've met three Ukranian couples here, men of fighting age, we know why they're here, I never bring it up.

Just tonight a new podcaster to me said Ukraine is enlisting 16-year-old boys, and training 14 year olds. Disgusting.

What is your source for one million dead Russians?

Ukraine doesn't have enough airpower, artillery, ammo, or manpower to enact that kind of damage, especially since Russia has defensive air systems and are now employing a 3 / 6 / 6 (??) attack deployment with drones, after artillery, to further limit casualties. If they happen to stumble into a hornets nest after repeated air bombardment and multiple drones, only 3 men are at risk of death.

the BI warfare experts with degrees (or none) in poli sci and undoubtedly zero military experience on this board is impressive. Most of it garnered thru memes and hot takes and playing Stratego……case in point in bolstering an argument you get "a podcaster to me said"….followed by "what is your source for 1m dead Russians"? LMAO.

Let's face it, this is a quid pro quo as Trump seeks to capture Geeenland


WELCOME TO THE DUMBEST BLOG AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA.

PEOPLE THAT HAVE THE IQ OF A QUAIL.

WE SHOULD ALL BE VERY PROUD!

GO BEARS!


oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

cal83dls79 said:

movielover said:

There are hundreds of videos online showing Ukrainians being kidnapped off the street for warfare. Millions have fled. I've met three Ukranian couples here, men of fighting age, we know why they're here, I never bring it up.

Just tonight a new podcaster to me said Ukraine is enlisting 16-year-old boys, and training 14 year olds. Disgusting.

What is your source for one million dead Russians?

Ukraine doesn't have enough airpower, artillery, ammo, or manpower to enact that kind of damage, especially since Russia has defensive air systems and are now employing a 3 / 6 / 6 (??) attack deployment with drones, after artillery, to further limit casualties. If they happen to stumble into a hornets nest after repeated air bombardment and multiple drones, only 3 men are at risk of death.

the BI warfare experts with degrees (or none) in poli sci and undoubtedly zero military experience on this board is impressive. Most of it garnered thru memes and hot takes and playing Stratego……case in point in bolstering an argument you get "a podcaster to me said"….followed by "what is your source for 1m dead Russians"? LMAO.

Let's face it, this is a quid pro quo as Trump seeks to capture Geeenland


WELCOME TO THE DUMBEST BLOG AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA.

PEOPLE THAT HAVE THE IQ OF A QUAIL.

WE SHOULD ALL BE VERY PROUD!

GO BEARS!




Please stop SHOUTING about yourself so much. Nobody cares what you think of yourself.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our Mascot is a LOSER.
A total MORON.


Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

cal83dls79 said:

movielover said:

There are hundreds of videos online showing Ukrainians being kidnapped off the street for warfare. Millions have fled. I've met three Ukranian couples here, men of fighting age, we know why they're here, I never bring it up.

Just tonight a new podcaster to me said Ukraine is enlisting 16-year-old boys, and training 14 year olds. Disgusting.

What is your source for one million dead Russians?

Ukraine doesn't have enough airpower, artillery, ammo, or manpower to enact that kind of damage, especially since Russia has defensive air systems and are now employing a 3 / 6 / 6 (??) attack deployment with drones, after artillery, to further limit casualties. If they happen to stumble into a hornets nest after repeated air bombardment and multiple drones, only 3 men are at risk of death.

the BI warfare experts with degrees (or none) in poli sci and undoubtedly zero military experience on this board is impressive. Most of it garnered thru memes and hot takes and playing Stratego……case in point in bolstering an argument you get "a podcaster to me said"….followed by "what is your source for 1m dead Russians"? LMAO.

Let's face it, this is a quid pro quo as Trump seeks to capture Geeenland


WELCOME TO THE DUMBEST BLOG AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA.

PEOPLE THAT HAVE THE IQ OF A QUAIL.

WE SHOULD ALL BE VERY PROUD!

GO BEARS!



Please stop SHOUTING about yourself so much. Nobody cares what you think of yourself.


Ironically enough, these rants about the presumed ignorance of Ukraine war skeptics on this board happened on the day that what ML and yours truly have been vindicated about the most important aspect of this war, the true extent of Ukrainian losses: 1,720,000 killed or missing in action, a number we have kept stating.

Zelensky's official count is 45,000 KIAs, this shows the magnitude of the lies that have kept this bloodbath going.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"I can end that war before I become President"

"I can do a deal to end that war in 24 hours"

MAGA MORONS like our MASCOT.




oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

"I can end that war before I become President"

"I can do a deal to end that war in 24 hours"

MAGA MORONS like our MASCOT.






Even demented folks should at least appreciate that Trump is bringing us close to peace, right? Biden's administration seemed to scuttle peace deals in efforts to weaken Russia and enrich themselves.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Even demented folks should at least appreciate that Trump is bringing us close to peace, right? Biden's administration seemed to scuttle peace deals in efforts to weaken Russia and enrich themselves.


Even gullible losers should at least appreciate that Trump is the BIGGEST LOSER of ALL.

U.S. July budget deficit up 20% year over year.

MAGA!





US deficit grows to $291 billion in July despite tariff revenue surge

US budget deficit climbs despite record income from Trump's tariffs | AP News




movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

cal83dls79 said:

movielover said:

There are hundreds of videos online showing Ukrainians being kidnapped off the street for warfare. Millions have fled. I've met three Ukranian couples here, men of fighting age, we know why they're here, I never bring it up.

Just tonight a new podcaster to me said Ukraine is enlisting 16-year-old boys, and training 14 year olds. Disgusting.

What is your source for one million dead Russians?

Ukraine doesn't have enough airpower, artillery, ammo, or manpower to enact that kind of damage, especially since Russia has defensive air systems and are now employing a 3 / 6 / 6 (??) attack deployment with drones, after artillery, to further limit casualties. If they happen to stumble into a hornets nest after repeated air bombardment and multiple drones, only 3 men are at risk of death.

the BI warfare experts with degrees (or none) in poli sci and undoubtedly zero military experience on this board is impressive. Most of it garnered thru memes and hot takes and playing Stratego……case in point in bolstering an argument you get "a podcaster to me said"….followed by "what is your source for 1m dead Russians"? LMAO.

Let's face it, this is a quid pro quo as Trump seeks to capture Geeenland


WELCOME TO THE DUMBEST BLOG AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA.

PEOPLE THAT HAVE THE IQ OF A QUAIL.

WE SHOULD ALL BE VERY PROUD!

GO BEARS!



Please stop SHOUTING about yourself so much. Nobody cares what you think of yourself.


Ironically enough, these rants about the presumed ignorance of Ukraine war skeptics on this board happened on the day that what ML and yours truly have been vindicated about the most important aspect of this war, the true extent of Ukrainian losses: 1,720,000 killed or missing in action, a number we have kept stating.

Zelensky's official count is 45,000 KIAs, this shows the magnitude of the lies that have kept this bloodbath going.


PittsburgWags typical response when proven wrong: change the topic.

FTR, I don't "cheer" against Ukraine, I'm looking at reality as best as I can ascertain. President Trump inherited a dumpster fire, and I believe is the only major figure pushing for peace. NATO wants war, the EU oddly wants war, the neocon warpigs want war, the TDS Trump Haters like Pittsburg Wags want war, Democrats want Trump to fail = want war, the MIC wants war, China probably wants war as it weakens us (some say they fear they're next in line for attack by the MIC Blob).

I'll consider any rational facts or concepts. MacGregor claims Trump has few advisors in the WH who share his gut anti-war stance (which many like). (I'm unsure about NSA Kellogg.) Russia is winning decisively now, why should they stop, especially w Zelensky in control. Some allege once they get past the current well-fortified positions, they can gobble up much larger geography. Our CIA and NATO may have permanently wrecked Ukraine. (Their deep corruption doesn't help.)

I read today that our client states France and UK have backed out of being part of a proposed military defense (security guarantee) of Ukraine. All talk, no mettle.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hot coffee beans?

First Page Refresh
Page 351 of 351
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.