The Official Russian Invasion of Ukraine Thread

1,922,262 Views | 13370 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by Aunburdened
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:



Quote:

"They had this fantasy about imposing a strategic defeat on Russia and all these talking points [EU officials] keep repeating show some of them are still stuck in these illusions. Even though they know, they absolutely know, that ship sailed ages ago and was never realistic in the first place. They just convinced themselves it was true because they wanted to believe it. And now they can't bring themselves to admit they were wrong. They've basically taken themselves out of the whole process. That's the first thing.

"Second. They look at the situation today, don't like what they see, and instead of being helpful, they've started getting in the way of the current US administration and President Trump, who's trying to reach a peace deal through negotiations. They walked away from talks themselves, and now they're blocking Trump too.

"Third. They don't have a peace plan at all. They're openly backing war. And even when they pretend they're proposing "adjustments" to Trump's plan, it's obvious what they're doing: every one of those changes is meant to kill the peace process entirely. They set conditions that they know Russia could never accept, and then the plan is to blame Russia later for the collapse. That's the whole game. And we see it clearly.

"So if they want to come back down to earth and deal with reality as it is on the ground, they're welcome to [join the process]."



Thanks for skipping the middleman this time and just quoting Putin's arguments directly.

The truth is the truth, regardless of who says it. That whole "Putin's puppet" thing you idiots tried didn't work.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:



Quote:

"They had this fantasy about imposing a strategic defeat on Russia and all these talking points [EU officials] keep repeating show some of them are still stuck in these illusions. Even though they know, they absolutely know, that ship sailed ages ago and was never realistic in the first place. They just convinced themselves it was true because they wanted to believe it. And now they can't bring themselves to admit they were wrong. They've basically taken themselves out of the whole process. That's the first thing.

"Second. They look at the situation today, don't like what they see, and instead of being helpful, they've started getting in the way of the current US administration and President Trump, who's trying to reach a peace deal through negotiations. They walked away from talks themselves, and now they're blocking Trump too.

"Third. They don't have a peace plan at all. They're openly backing war. And even when they pretend they're proposing "adjustments" to Trump's plan, it's obvious what they're doing: every one of those changes is meant to kill the peace process entirely. They set conditions that they know Russia could never accept, and then the plan is to blame Russia later for the collapse. That's the whole game. And we see it clearly.

"So if they want to come back down to earth and deal with reality as it is on the ground, they're welcome to [join the process]."



Thanks for skipping the middleman this time and just quoting Putin's arguments directly.

The truth is the truth, regardless of who says it. That whole "Putin's puppet" thing you idiots tried didn't work.

I don't think you're refuting the "Putin's puppet" claim very well by quoting Putin, but you do you.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The alternative being, continue fighting in a lost cause to the last Ukrainian. 1.7 million dead, another million to go...
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

The alternative being, continue fighting in a lost cause to the last Ukrainian. 1.7 million dead, another million to go...

I don't advocate for continuing the war, but I also doubt Putin's sincerity in wanting to end it himself. And he is really the only one who can end it.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Warhawk puppet and Putin puppet sitting in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

The alternative being, continue fighting in a lost cause to the last Ukrainian. 1.7 million dead, another million to go...

I don't advocate for continuing the war, but I also doubt Putin's sincerity in wanting to end it himself. And he is really the only one who can end it.


As a result, we need to understand what his demands are for ending the war, something that people like Mearsheimer, Sachs and co have analyzed and stated at length over the years.

It's basic game theory, someone like Putin understands that both Ukrainians and Russians would be better off living in peace. There is not much incentive for Putin to restart a war provided Ukraine adopts the postwar Finnish or Austrian neutrality models.

Minsk was supposed to be a win-win arrangement, as was the Istanbul accord, both Ukraine and Russia would have been better off had that gone through.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

The alternative being, continue fighting in a lost cause to the last Ukrainian. 1.7 million dead, another million to go...

I don't advocate for continuing the war, but I also doubt Putin's sincerity in wanting to end it himself. And he is really the only one who can end it.


As a result, we need to understand what his demands are for ending the war, something that people like Mearsheimer, Sachs and co have analyzed and stated at length over the years.

It's basic game theory, someone like Putin understands that both Ukrainians and Russians would be better off living in peace. There is not much incentive for Putin to restart a war provided Ukraine adopts the postwar Finnish or Austrian neutrality models.

Minsk was supposed to be a win-win arrangement, as was the Istanbul accord, both Ukraine and Russia would have been better off had that gone through.

You put a lot of trust in the idea that Putin doesn't want to keep fighting. I do not.

Hope you're right!
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Actually, didn't Team Trump have a long list which included setting the stage for business deals, rare earth's, etc., and Putin sdked to have those items covered in a separate but connected deal.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

They "invaded" bc they ignored Putin, overthrew the political leadership, inserted Victoria Nuland (aka Darth Vader) into the mix, put 12 CIA bases on Russias border, spent years planning to take Russian lands, and we're forcing NATO into Ukraine- a gard line for Russia. An existential threat.

Why does "invaded" always need to be in scare quotes for Russia, like they didn't actually do it? They did, it's okay to admit it.


We (NATO) invaded and dismantled Yugoslavia, balkanized and gerrymandered it into several new countries like Kosovo because one party mistreated the other.

Yugoslavia was already breaking apart on its own and it was probably good to prevent the genocide/apartheid conditions of the Kosovars. Also quite notably, the US and/or NATO never attempted to absorb that territory into one of its existing nations, instead helping to set up a separate independent nation.

Russia's claims against Ukraine have always been pretty heavily exaggerated or outright made-up, and they actually do want to absorb that territory for themselves. Quite different.


Putin88 routinely puts blame on America when other countries have civil wars. Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria.






"Confession of a CIA Agent:
"They gave us millions to dismember Yugoslavia"

As a senior CIA operative, Baer worked in Yugoslavia during the 1991-94 period and in the Middle East

"Do you have a message for the people of the former Yugoslavia?

I have. Forget the past, it was staged and false. They manipulated you, they got what they wanted and it is stupid that you still hate one another, you must show that you are stronger and realise who has created this ! I sincerely apologise! That's why I have for a long time disclosed the secrets of the CIA and the White House!"

"We bribed parties and politicians who enticed hate between the nations (second pictures). Our ultimate goal was to enslave you!"
https://greanvillepost.com/2015/11/29/108895/


bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I haven't read all his material and it could all be true….but with this caveat:

Being ex CIA doesn't give you any truth cred in my opinion. Frank Terpil and Gary Korkala were ex CIA and collectively crooked as f@uck and both were one flew over the f'ing cuckoo's nest.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

They "invaded" bc they ignored Putin, overthrew the political leadership, inserted Victoria Nuland (aka Darth Vader) into the mix, put 12 CIA bases on Russias border, spent years planning to take Russian lands, and we're forcing NATO into Ukraine- a gard line for Russia. An existential threat.

Why does "invaded" always need to be in scare quotes for Russia, like they didn't actually do it? They did, it's okay to admit it.


We (NATO) invaded and dismantled Yugoslavia, balkanized and gerrymandered it into several new countries like Kosovo because one party mistreated the other.

Yugoslavia was already breaking apart on its own and it was probably good to prevent the genocide/apartheid conditions of the Kosovars. Also quite notably, the US and/or NATO never attempted to absorb that territory into one of its existing nations, instead helping to set up a separate independent nation.

Russia's claims against Ukraine have always been pretty heavily exaggerated or outright made-up, and they actually do want to absorb that territory for themselves. Quite different.


Putin88 routinely puts blame on America when other countries have civil wars. Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria.






"Confession of a CIA Agent:
"They gave us millions to dismember Yugoslavia"

As a senior CIA operative, Baer worked in Yugoslavia during the 1991-94 period and in the Middle East

"Do you have a message for the people of the former Yugoslavia?

I have. Forget the past, it was staged and false. They manipulated you, they got what they wanted and it is stupid that you still hate one another, you must show that you are stronger and realise who has created this ! I sincerely apologise! That's why I have for a long time disclosed the secrets of the CIA and the White House!"

"We bribed parties and politicians who enticed hate between the nations (second pictures). Our ultimate goal was to enslave you!"
https://greanvillepost.com/2015/11/29/108895/

Good job sharing a fake interview. Is this in the same file with your fake Time Magazine articles about "global cooling?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Baer
Quote:

Robert Baer has never written or promoted a book with the title "The Secret of the White House", but a fabricated interview with him about promoting this book in Canada has been circulating on the web since 2012. In this fabricated interview the USA was accused of having caused the collapse of Yugoslavia.

https://seecheck.org/index.php/2023/03/24/a-fictional-interview-with-a-former-cia-agent-has-been-circulating-in-the-balkans-for-a-decade/
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

They "invaded" bc they ignored Putin, overthrew the political leadership, inserted Victoria Nuland (aka Darth Vader) into the mix, put 12 CIA bases on Russias border, spent years planning to take Russian lands, and we're forcing NATO into Ukraine- a gard line for Russia. An existential threat.

Why does "invaded" always need to be in scare quotes for Russia, like they didn't actually do it? They did, it's okay to admit it.


We (NATO) invaded and dismantled Yugoslavia, balkanized and gerrymandered it into several new countries like Kosovo because one party mistreated the other.

Yugoslavia was already breaking apart on its own and it was probably good to prevent the genocide/apartheid conditions of the Kosovars. Also quite notably, the US and/or NATO never attempted to absorb that territory into one of its existing nations, instead helping to set up a separate independent nation.

Russia's claims against Ukraine have always been pretty heavily exaggerated or outright made-up, and they actually do want to absorb that territory for themselves. Quite different.


Putin88 routinely puts blame on America when other countries have civil wars. Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria.






"Confession of a CIA Agent:
"They gave us millions to dismember Yugoslavia"

As a senior CIA operative, Baer worked in Yugoslavia during the 1991-94 period and in the Middle East

"Do you have a message for the people of the former Yugoslavia?

I have. Forget the past, it was staged and false. They manipulated you, they got what they wanted and it is stupid that you still hate one another, you must show that you are stronger and realise who has created this ! I sincerely apologise! That's why I have for a long time disclosed the secrets of the CIA and the White House!"

"We bribed parties and politicians who enticed hate between the nations (second pictures). Our ultimate goal was to enslave you!"
https://greanvillepost.com/2015/11/29/108895/

Good job sharing a fake interview. Is this in the same file with your fake Time Magazine articles about "global cooling?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Baer
Quote:

Robert Baer has never written or promoted a book with the title "The Secret of the White House", but a fabricated interview with him about promoting this book in Canada has been circulating on the web since 2012. In this fabricated interview the USA was accused of having caused the collapse of Yugoslavia.

https://seecheck.org/index.php/2023/03/24/a-fictional-interview-with-a-former-cia-agent-has-been-circulating-in-the-balkans-for-a-decade/



Google search result of "Robert Baer on Yugoslavia" returns:


AI Overview

Robert Baer, a former CIA case officer who served in the former Yugoslavia from 1991-1994, has made claims that the United States and the CIA actively worked to dismember Yugoslavia by financing propaganda and bribing politicians to incite ethnic hatred.

Key Claims by Robert Baer
Baer's statements, primarily from interviews that have circulated online since around 20122015, outline a covert operation designed to accelerate the breakup of the nation. His claims include:
  • Financial Influence: Baer stated that he and his team were given millions of dollars to bribe "non-governmental organizations, opposition parties and politicians" to encourage nationalism and the separation of the republics.
  • Propaganda and Panic: A primary objective of the operation, code-named "The Truth" (Istina), was to spread misinformation and panic, specifically by fabricating stories about Serbian terrorist groups to stoke fear among other ethnic groups.
  • Manipulation of Events: Baer alleged that events like the Srebrenica massacre were politically manipulated and exaggerated for media consumption to justify international intervention and blame the Serbs. The goal was to create a pretext for Western involvement.
  • Economic Motives: He argued that the ultimate goal of the intervention was economic control, allowing Western companies to exploit natural resources and turn the people of the Balkans into "slaves" dependent on foreign loans.
  • Corrupt Politicians: He claimed that various politicians from the former Yugoslavia, including Stipe Mesic, Franjo Tudjman, and Alija Izetbegovic, received money from the CIA.
Context and Reception
It is important to note the context of these claims:
  • Fabricated Book Interview: The primary source of these specific claims about Yugoslavia is a widely circulated interview that falsely links them to the promotion of a non-existent book titled The Secret of the White House. His actual published works do not focus on this.
  • Controversy and Skepticism: Baer's statements are considered highly controversial and are disputed by official accounts and other sources, which point to the complex historical, cultural, and political factors that led to the dissolution of Yugoslavia. Srebrenica, for instance, is widely recognized as a genocide by the UN and international bodies with extensive evidence.
  • Career: Baer is a decorated former intelligence officer who has written several books on the CIA and Middle East policy (e.g., See No Evil), which have been well-received and even adapted into the film Syriana. His general credibility as a critic of US foreign policy lends some weight to his overall anti-establishment stance, but these particular claims about Yugoslavia remain contentious and largely unsubstantiated outside of the disputed interviews.
So the book is not real, but his statements are.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

They "invaded" bc they ignored Putin, overthrew the political leadership, inserted Victoria Nuland (aka Darth Vader) into the mix, put 12 CIA bases on Russias border, spent years planning to take Russian lands, and we're forcing NATO into Ukraine- a gard line for Russia. An existential threat.

Why does "invaded" always need to be in scare quotes for Russia, like they didn't actually do it? They did, it's okay to admit it.


We (NATO) invaded and dismantled Yugoslavia, balkanized and gerrymandered it into several new countries like Kosovo because one party mistreated the other.

Yugoslavia was already breaking apart on its own and it was probably good to prevent the genocide/apartheid conditions of the Kosovars. Also quite notably, the US and/or NATO never attempted to absorb that territory into one of its existing nations, instead helping to set up a separate independent nation.

Russia's claims against Ukraine have always been pretty heavily exaggerated or outright made-up, and they actually do want to absorb that territory for themselves. Quite different.


Putin88 routinely puts blame on America when other countries have civil wars. Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria.






"Confession of a CIA Agent:
"They gave us millions to dismember Yugoslavia"

As a senior CIA operative, Baer worked in Yugoslavia during the 1991-94 period and in the Middle East

"Do you have a message for the people of the former Yugoslavia?

I have. Forget the past, it was staged and false. They manipulated you, they got what they wanted and it is stupid that you still hate one another, you must show that you are stronger and realise who has created this ! I sincerely apologise! That's why I have for a long time disclosed the secrets of the CIA and the White House!"

"We bribed parties and politicians who enticed hate between the nations (second pictures). Our ultimate goal was to enslave you!"
https://greanvillepost.com/2015/11/29/108895/

Good job sharing a fake interview. Is this in the same file with your fake Time Magazine articles about "global cooling?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Baer
Quote:

Robert Baer has never written or promoted a book with the title "The Secret of the White House", but a fabricated interview with him about promoting this book in Canada has been circulating on the web since 2012. In this fabricated interview the USA was accused of having caused the collapse of Yugoslavia.

https://seecheck.org/index.php/2023/03/24/a-fictional-interview-with-a-former-cia-agent-has-been-circulating-in-the-balkans-for-a-decade/



Google search result of "Robert Baer on Yugoslavia" returns:


AI Overview

Robert Baer, a former CIA case officer who served in the former Yugoslavia from 1991-1994, has made claims that the United States and the CIA actively worked to dismember Yugoslavia by financing propaganda and bribing politicians to incite ethnic hatred.

Key Claims by Robert Baer
Baer's statements, primarily from interviews that have circulated online since around 20122015, outline a covert operation designed to accelerate the breakup of the nation. His claims include:
  • Financial Influence: Baer stated that he and his team were given millions of dollars to bribe "non-governmental organizations, opposition parties and politicians" to encourage nationalism and the separation of the republics.
  • Propaganda and Panic: A primary objective of the operation, code-named "The Truth" (Istina), was to spread misinformation and panic, specifically by fabricating stories about Serbian terrorist groups to stoke fear among other ethnic groups.
  • Manipulation of Events: Baer alleged that events like the Srebrenica massacre were politically manipulated and exaggerated for media consumption to justify international intervention and blame the Serbs. The goal was to create a pretext for Western involvement.
  • Economic Motives: He argued that the ultimate goal of the intervention was economic control, allowing Western companies to exploit natural resources and turn the people of the Balkans into "slaves" dependent on foreign loans.
  • Corrupt Politicians: He claimed that various politicians from the former Yugoslavia, including Stipe Mesic, Franjo Tudjman, and Alija Izetbegovic, received money from the CIA.
Context and Reception
It is important to note the context of these claims:
  • Fabricated Book Interview: The primary source of these specific claims about Yugoslavia is a widely circulated interview that falsely links them to the promotion of a non-existent book titled The Secret of the White House. His actual published works do not focus on this.
  • Controversy and Skepticism: Baer's statements are considered highly controversial and are disputed by official accounts and other sources, which point to the complex historical, cultural, and political factors that led to the dissolution of Yugoslavia. Srebrenica, for instance, is widely recognized as a genocide by the UN and international bodies with extensive evidence.
  • Career: Baer is a decorated former intelligence officer who has written several books on the CIA and Middle East policy (e.g., See No Evil), which have been well-received and even adapted into the film Syriana. His general credibility as a critic of US foreign policy lends some weight to his overall anti-establishment stance, but these particular claims about Yugoslavia remain contentious and largely unsubstantiated outside of the disputed interviews.
So the book is not real, but his statements are.


They aren't real. The AI is pulling its information from the fake articles that were propagated across the Internet, as described in the article:
https://seecheck.org/index.php/2023/03/24/a-fictional-interview-with-a-former-cia-agent-has-been-circulating-in-the-balkans-for-a-decade/

Quote:

We contacted Robert Baer through his publishing house to inquire about the authenticity of the "interview" that has been circulating in the region for more than a decade. In his reply, he unequivocally confirmed that it was pure fiction:

The interview is completely made up. During the short time I was in Sarajevo, I worked strictly on Middle Eastern terrorism and knew next to nothing about local politics.

Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

They "invaded" bc they ignored Putin, overthrew the political leadership, inserted Victoria Nuland (aka Darth Vader) into the mix, put 12 CIA bases on Russias border, spent years planning to take Russian lands, and we're forcing NATO into Ukraine- a gard line for Russia. An existential threat.

Why does "invaded" always need to be in scare quotes for Russia, like they didn't actually do it? They did, it's okay to admit it.


We (NATO) invaded and dismantled Yugoslavia, balkanized and gerrymandered it into several new countries like Kosovo because one party mistreated the other.

Yugoslavia was already breaking apart on its own and it was probably good to prevent the genocide/apartheid conditions of the Kosovars. Also quite notably, the US and/or NATO never attempted to absorb that territory into one of its existing nations, instead helping to set up a separate independent nation.

Russia's claims against Ukraine have always been pretty heavily exaggerated or outright made-up, and they actually do want to absorb that territory for themselves. Quite different.


Putin88 routinely puts blame on America when other countries have civil wars. Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria.






"Confession of a CIA Agent:
"They gave us millions to dismember Yugoslavia"

As a senior CIA operative, Baer worked in Yugoslavia during the 1991-94 period and in the Middle East

"Do you have a message for the people of the former Yugoslavia?

I have. Forget the past, it was staged and false. They manipulated you, they got what they wanted and it is stupid that you still hate one another, you must show that you are stronger and realise who has created this ! I sincerely apologise! That's why I have for a long time disclosed the secrets of the CIA and the White House!"

"We bribed parties and politicians who enticed hate between the nations (second pictures). Our ultimate goal was to enslave you!"
https://greanvillepost.com/2015/11/29/108895/

Good job sharing a fake interview. Is this in the same file with your fake Time Magazine articles about "global cooling?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Baer
Quote:

Robert Baer has never written or promoted a book with the title "The Secret of the White House", but a fabricated interview with him about promoting this book in Canada has been circulating on the web since 2012. In this fabricated interview the USA was accused of having caused the collapse of Yugoslavia.

https://seecheck.org/index.php/2023/03/24/a-fictional-interview-with-a-former-cia-agent-has-been-circulating-in-the-balkans-for-a-decade/



Google search result of "Robert Baer on Yugoslavia" returns:


AI Overview

Robert Baer, a former CIA case officer who served in the former Yugoslavia from 1991-1994, has made claims that the United States and the CIA actively worked to dismember Yugoslavia by financing propaganda and bribing politicians to incite ethnic hatred.

Key Claims by Robert Baer
Baer's statements, primarily from interviews that have circulated online since around 20122015, outline a covert operation designed to accelerate the breakup of the nation. His claims include:
  • Financial Influence: Baer stated that he and his team were given millions of dollars to bribe "non-governmental organizations, opposition parties and politicians" to encourage nationalism and the separation of the republics.
  • Propaganda and Panic: A primary objective of the operation, code-named "The Truth" (Istina), was to spread misinformation and panic, specifically by fabricating stories about Serbian terrorist groups to stoke fear among other ethnic groups.
  • Manipulation of Events: Baer alleged that events like the Srebrenica massacre were politically manipulated and exaggerated for media consumption to justify international intervention and blame the Serbs. The goal was to create a pretext for Western involvement.
  • Economic Motives: He argued that the ultimate goal of the intervention was economic control, allowing Western companies to exploit natural resources and turn the people of the Balkans into "slaves" dependent on foreign loans.
  • Corrupt Politicians: He claimed that various politicians from the former Yugoslavia, including Stipe Mesic, Franjo Tudjman, and Alija Izetbegovic, received money from the CIA.
Context and Reception
It is important to note the context of these claims:
  • Fabricated Book Interview: The primary source of these specific claims about Yugoslavia is a widely circulated interview that falsely links them to the promotion of a non-existent book titled The Secret of the White House. His actual published works do not focus on this.
  • Controversy and Skepticism: Baer's statements are considered highly controversial and are disputed by official accounts and other sources, which point to the complex historical, cultural, and political factors that led to the dissolution of Yugoslavia. Srebrenica, for instance, is widely recognized as a genocide by the UN and international bodies with extensive evidence.
  • Career: Baer is a decorated former intelligence officer who has written several books on the CIA and Middle East policy (e.g., See No Evil), which have been well-received and even adapted into the film Syriana. His general credibility as a critic of US foreign policy lends some weight to his overall anti-establishment stance, but these particular claims about Yugoslavia remain contentious and largely unsubstantiated outside of the disputed interviews.
So the book is not real, but his statements are.


They aren't real. The AI is pulling its information from the fake articles that were propagated across the Internet, as described in the article:
https://seecheck.org/index.php/2023/03/24/a-fictional-interview-with-a-former-cia-agent-has-been-circulating-in-the-balkans-for-a-decade/

Quote:

We contacted Robert Baer through his publishing house to inquire about the authenticity of the "interview" that has been circulating in the region for more than a decade. In his reply, he unequivocally confirmed that it was pure fiction:

The interview is completely made up. During the short time I was in Sarajevo, I worked strictly on Middle Eastern terrorism and knew next to nothing about local politics.




The Google search result mention several interviews made by Baer when he made statements about US policy wanting to break up Yugoslavia.

In any case, balkanizing Yugoslavia was a well-established policy, there is nothing controversial about it, echoed by many other political observers:







sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

They "invaded" bc they ignored Putin, overthrew the political leadership, inserted Victoria Nuland (aka Darth Vader) into the mix, put 12 CIA bases on Russias border, spent years planning to take Russian lands, and we're forcing NATO into Ukraine- a gard line for Russia. An existential threat.

Why does "invaded" always need to be in scare quotes for Russia, like they didn't actually do it? They did, it's okay to admit it.


We (NATO) invaded and dismantled Yugoslavia, balkanized and gerrymandered it into several new countries like Kosovo because one party mistreated the other.

Yugoslavia was already breaking apart on its own and it was probably good to prevent the genocide/apartheid conditions of the Kosovars. Also quite notably, the US and/or NATO never attempted to absorb that territory into one of its existing nations, instead helping to set up a separate independent nation.

Russia's claims against Ukraine have always been pretty heavily exaggerated or outright made-up, and they actually do want to absorb that territory for themselves. Quite different.


Putin88 routinely puts blame on America when other countries have civil wars. Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria.






"Confession of a CIA Agent:
"They gave us millions to dismember Yugoslavia"

As a senior CIA operative, Baer worked in Yugoslavia during the 1991-94 period and in the Middle East

"Do you have a message for the people of the former Yugoslavia?

I have. Forget the past, it was staged and false. They manipulated you, they got what they wanted and it is stupid that you still hate one another, you must show that you are stronger and realise who has created this ! I sincerely apologise! That's why I have for a long time disclosed the secrets of the CIA and the White House!"

"We bribed parties and politicians who enticed hate between the nations (second pictures). Our ultimate goal was to enslave you!"
https://greanvillepost.com/2015/11/29/108895/

Good job sharing a fake interview. Is this in the same file with your fake Time Magazine articles about "global cooling?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Baer
Quote:

Robert Baer has never written or promoted a book with the title "The Secret of the White House", but a fabricated interview with him about promoting this book in Canada has been circulating on the web since 2012. In this fabricated interview the USA was accused of having caused the collapse of Yugoslavia.

https://seecheck.org/index.php/2023/03/24/a-fictional-interview-with-a-former-cia-agent-has-been-circulating-in-the-balkans-for-a-decade/



Google search result of "Robert Baer on Yugoslavia" returns:


AI Overview

Robert Baer, a former CIA case officer who served in the former Yugoslavia from 1991-1994, has made claims that the United States and the CIA actively worked to dismember Yugoslavia by financing propaganda and bribing politicians to incite ethnic hatred.

Key Claims by Robert Baer
Baer's statements, primarily from interviews that have circulated online since around 20122015, outline a covert operation designed to accelerate the breakup of the nation. His claims include:
  • Financial Influence: Baer stated that he and his team were given millions of dollars to bribe "non-governmental organizations, opposition parties and politicians" to encourage nationalism and the separation of the republics.
  • Propaganda and Panic: A primary objective of the operation, code-named "The Truth" (Istina), was to spread misinformation and panic, specifically by fabricating stories about Serbian terrorist groups to stoke fear among other ethnic groups.
  • Manipulation of Events: Baer alleged that events like the Srebrenica massacre were politically manipulated and exaggerated for media consumption to justify international intervention and blame the Serbs. The goal was to create a pretext for Western involvement.
  • Economic Motives: He argued that the ultimate goal of the intervention was economic control, allowing Western companies to exploit natural resources and turn the people of the Balkans into "slaves" dependent on foreign loans.
  • Corrupt Politicians: He claimed that various politicians from the former Yugoslavia, including Stipe Mesic, Franjo Tudjman, and Alija Izetbegovic, received money from the CIA.
Context and Reception
It is important to note the context of these claims:
  • Fabricated Book Interview: The primary source of these specific claims about Yugoslavia is a widely circulated interview that falsely links them to the promotion of a non-existent book titled The Secret of the White House. His actual published works do not focus on this.
  • Controversy and Skepticism: Baer's statements are considered highly controversial and are disputed by official accounts and other sources, which point to the complex historical, cultural, and political factors that led to the dissolution of Yugoslavia. Srebrenica, for instance, is widely recognized as a genocide by the UN and international bodies with extensive evidence.
  • Career: Baer is a decorated former intelligence officer who has written several books on the CIA and Middle East policy (e.g., See No Evil), which have been well-received and even adapted into the film Syriana. His general credibility as a critic of US foreign policy lends some weight to his overall anti-establishment stance, but these particular claims about Yugoslavia remain contentious and largely unsubstantiated outside of the disputed interviews.
So the book is not real, but his statements are.


They aren't real. The AI is pulling its information from the fake articles that were propagated across the Internet, as described in the article:
https://seecheck.org/index.php/2023/03/24/a-fictional-interview-with-a-former-cia-agent-has-been-circulating-in-the-balkans-for-a-decade/

Quote:

We contacted Robert Baer through his publishing house to inquire about the authenticity of the "interview" that has been circulating in the region for more than a decade. In his reply, he unequivocally confirmed that it was pure fiction:

The interview is completely made up. During the short time I was in Sarajevo, I worked strictly on Middle Eastern terrorism and knew next to nothing about local politics.




The Google search result mention several interviews made by Baer when he made statements about US policy wanting to break up Yugoslavia.

Yeah, I looked at them. They're all the exact same article, the fake one you posted earlier, just on different websites. Baer never did a real interview on this subject. You've been had.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

They "invaded" bc they ignored Putin, overthrew the political leadership, inserted Victoria Nuland (aka Darth Vader) into the mix, put 12 CIA bases on Russias border, spent years planning to take Russian lands, and we're forcing NATO into Ukraine- a gard line for Russia. An existential threat.

Why does "invaded" always need to be in scare quotes for Russia, like they didn't actually do it? They did, it's okay to admit it.


We (NATO) invaded and dismantled Yugoslavia, balkanized and gerrymandered it into several new countries like Kosovo because one party mistreated the other.

Yugoslavia was already breaking apart on its own and it was probably good to prevent the genocide/apartheid conditions of the Kosovars. Also quite notably, the US and/or NATO never attempted to absorb that territory into one of its existing nations, instead helping to set up a separate independent nation.

Russia's claims against Ukraine have always been pretty heavily exaggerated or outright made-up, and they actually do want to absorb that territory for themselves. Quite different.


Putin88 routinely puts blame on America when other countries have civil wars. Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria.






"Confession of a CIA Agent:
"They gave us millions to dismember Yugoslavia"

As a senior CIA operative, Baer worked in Yugoslavia during the 1991-94 period and in the Middle East

"Do you have a message for the people of the former Yugoslavia?

I have. Forget the past, it was staged and false. They manipulated you, they got what they wanted and it is stupid that you still hate one another, you must show that you are stronger and realise who has created this ! I sincerely apologise! That's why I have for a long time disclosed the secrets of the CIA and the White House!"

"We bribed parties and politicians who enticed hate between the nations (second pictures). Our ultimate goal was to enslave you!"
https://greanvillepost.com/2015/11/29/108895/

Good job sharing a fake interview. Is this in the same file with your fake Time Magazine articles about "global cooling?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Baer
Quote:

Robert Baer has never written or promoted a book with the title "The Secret of the White House", but a fabricated interview with him about promoting this book in Canada has been circulating on the web since 2012. In this fabricated interview the USA was accused of having caused the collapse of Yugoslavia.

https://seecheck.org/index.php/2023/03/24/a-fictional-interview-with-a-former-cia-agent-has-been-circulating-in-the-balkans-for-a-decade/



Google search result of "Robert Baer on Yugoslavia" returns:


AI Overview

Robert Baer, a former CIA case officer who served in the former Yugoslavia from 1991-1994, has made claims that the United States and the CIA actively worked to dismember Yugoslavia by financing propaganda and bribing politicians to incite ethnic hatred.

Key Claims by Robert Baer
Baer's statements, primarily from interviews that have circulated online since around 20122015, outline a covert operation designed to accelerate the breakup of the nation. His claims include:
  • Financial Influence: Baer stated that he and his team were given millions of dollars to bribe "non-governmental organizations, opposition parties and politicians" to encourage nationalism and the separation of the republics.
  • Propaganda and Panic: A primary objective of the operation, code-named "The Truth" (Istina), was to spread misinformation and panic, specifically by fabricating stories about Serbian terrorist groups to stoke fear among other ethnic groups.
  • Manipulation of Events: Baer alleged that events like the Srebrenica massacre were politically manipulated and exaggerated for media consumption to justify international intervention and blame the Serbs. The goal was to create a pretext for Western involvement.
  • Economic Motives: He argued that the ultimate goal of the intervention was economic control, allowing Western companies to exploit natural resources and turn the people of the Balkans into "slaves" dependent on foreign loans.
  • Corrupt Politicians: He claimed that various politicians from the former Yugoslavia, including Stipe Mesic, Franjo Tudjman, and Alija Izetbegovic, received money from the CIA.
Context and Reception
It is important to note the context of these claims:
  • Fabricated Book Interview: The primary source of these specific claims about Yugoslavia is a widely circulated interview that falsely links them to the promotion of a non-existent book titled The Secret of the White House. His actual published works do not focus on this.
  • Controversy and Skepticism: Baer's statements are considered highly controversial and are disputed by official accounts and other sources, which point to the complex historical, cultural, and political factors that led to the dissolution of Yugoslavia. Srebrenica, for instance, is widely recognized as a genocide by the UN and international bodies with extensive evidence.
  • Career: Baer is a decorated former intelligence officer who has written several books on the CIA and Middle East policy (e.g., See No Evil), which have been well-received and even adapted into the film Syriana. His general credibility as a critic of US foreign policy lends some weight to his overall anti-establishment stance, but these particular claims about Yugoslavia remain contentious and largely unsubstantiated outside of the disputed interviews.
So the book is not real, but his statements are.


They aren't real. The AI is pulling its information from the fake articles that were propagated across the Internet, as described in the article:
https://seecheck.org/index.php/2023/03/24/a-fictional-interview-with-a-former-cia-agent-has-been-circulating-in-the-balkans-for-a-decade/

Quote:

We contacted Robert Baer through his publishing house to inquire about the authenticity of the "interview" that has been circulating in the region for more than a decade. In his reply, he unequivocally confirmed that it was pure fiction:

The interview is completely made up. During the short time I was in Sarajevo, I worked strictly on Middle Eastern terrorism and knew next to nothing about local politics.




The Google search result mention several interviews made by Baer when he made statements about US policy wanting to break up Yugoslavia.

Yeah, I looked at them. They're all the exact same article, the fake one you posted earlier, just on different websites. Baer never did a real interview on this subject. You've been had.


Baer has done dozens of interviews over the years, and has often been an outspoken critic of US policy as a part of the covert operations he has participated in, including Yugoslavia. It's very likely that he did talk about his time in that country in one of his many interviews, and not necessarily just the one whose authenticity is debatable.

In any case, there are many other sources that point to the dismemberment of Yugoslavia having been a US policy objective, with covert operations being conducted towards that goal. That is beyond debate.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

They "invaded" bc they ignored Putin, overthrew the political leadership, inserted Victoria Nuland (aka Darth Vader) into the mix, put 12 CIA bases on Russias border, spent years planning to take Russian lands, and we're forcing NATO into Ukraine- a gard line for Russia. An existential threat.

Why does "invaded" always need to be in scare quotes for Russia, like they didn't actually do it? They did, it's okay to admit it.


We (NATO) invaded and dismantled Yugoslavia, balkanized and gerrymandered it into several new countries like Kosovo because one party mistreated the other.

Yugoslavia was already breaking apart on its own and it was probably good to prevent the genocide/apartheid conditions of the Kosovars. Also quite notably, the US and/or NATO never attempted to absorb that territory into one of its existing nations, instead helping to set up a separate independent nation.

Russia's claims against Ukraine have always been pretty heavily exaggerated or outright made-up, and they actually do want to absorb that territory for themselves. Quite different.


Putin88 routinely puts blame on America when other countries have civil wars. Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria.






"Confession of a CIA Agent:
"They gave us millions to dismember Yugoslavia"

As a senior CIA operative, Baer worked in Yugoslavia during the 1991-94 period and in the Middle East

"Do you have a message for the people of the former Yugoslavia?

I have. Forget the past, it was staged and false. They manipulated you, they got what they wanted and it is stupid that you still hate one another, you must show that you are stronger and realise who has created this ! I sincerely apologise! That's why I have for a long time disclosed the secrets of the CIA and the White House!"

"We bribed parties and politicians who enticed hate between the nations (second pictures). Our ultimate goal was to enslave you!"
https://greanvillepost.com/2015/11/29/108895/

Good job sharing a fake interview. Is this in the same file with your fake Time Magazine articles about "global cooling?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Baer
Quote:

Robert Baer has never written or promoted a book with the title "The Secret of the White House", but a fabricated interview with him about promoting this book in Canada has been circulating on the web since 2012. In this fabricated interview the USA was accused of having caused the collapse of Yugoslavia.

https://seecheck.org/index.php/2023/03/24/a-fictional-interview-with-a-former-cia-agent-has-been-circulating-in-the-balkans-for-a-decade/



Google search result of "Robert Baer on Yugoslavia" returns:


AI Overview

Robert Baer, a former CIA case officer who served in the former Yugoslavia from 1991-1994, has made claims that the United States and the CIA actively worked to dismember Yugoslavia by financing propaganda and bribing politicians to incite ethnic hatred.

Key Claims by Robert Baer
Baer's statements, primarily from interviews that have circulated online since around 20122015, outline a covert operation designed to accelerate the breakup of the nation. His claims include:
  • Financial Influence: Baer stated that he and his team were given millions of dollars to bribe "non-governmental organizations, opposition parties and politicians" to encourage nationalism and the separation of the republics.
  • Propaganda and Panic: A primary objective of the operation, code-named "The Truth" (Istina), was to spread misinformation and panic, specifically by fabricating stories about Serbian terrorist groups to stoke fear among other ethnic groups.
  • Manipulation of Events: Baer alleged that events like the Srebrenica massacre were politically manipulated and exaggerated for media consumption to justify international intervention and blame the Serbs. The goal was to create a pretext for Western involvement.
  • Economic Motives: He argued that the ultimate goal of the intervention was economic control, allowing Western companies to exploit natural resources and turn the people of the Balkans into "slaves" dependent on foreign loans.
  • Corrupt Politicians: He claimed that various politicians from the former Yugoslavia, including Stipe Mesic, Franjo Tudjman, and Alija Izetbegovic, received money from the CIA.
Context and Reception
It is important to note the context of these claims:
  • Fabricated Book Interview: The primary source of these specific claims about Yugoslavia is a widely circulated interview that falsely links them to the promotion of a non-existent book titled The Secret of the White House. His actual published works do not focus on this.
  • Controversy and Skepticism: Baer's statements are considered highly controversial and are disputed by official accounts and other sources, which point to the complex historical, cultural, and political factors that led to the dissolution of Yugoslavia. Srebrenica, for instance, is widely recognized as a genocide by the UN and international bodies with extensive evidence.
  • Career: Baer is a decorated former intelligence officer who has written several books on the CIA and Middle East policy (e.g., See No Evil), which have been well-received and even adapted into the film Syriana. His general credibility as a critic of US foreign policy lends some weight to his overall anti-establishment stance, but these particular claims about Yugoslavia remain contentious and largely unsubstantiated outside of the disputed interviews.
So the book is not real, but his statements are.


They aren't real. The AI is pulling its information from the fake articles that were propagated across the Internet, as described in the article:
https://seecheck.org/index.php/2023/03/24/a-fictional-interview-with-a-former-cia-agent-has-been-circulating-in-the-balkans-for-a-decade/

Quote:

We contacted Robert Baer through his publishing house to inquire about the authenticity of the "interview" that has been circulating in the region for more than a decade. In his reply, he unequivocally confirmed that it was pure fiction:

The interview is completely made up. During the short time I was in Sarajevo, I worked strictly on Middle Eastern terrorism and knew next to nothing about local politics.




The Google search result mention several interviews made by Baer when he made statements about US policy wanting to break up Yugoslavia.

Yeah, I looked at them. They're all the exact same article, the fake one you posted earlier, just on different websites. Baer never did a real interview on this subject. You've been had.


Baer has done dozens of interviews over the years, and has often been an outspoken critic of US policy as a part of the covert operations he has participated in, including Yugoslavia. It's very likely that he did talk about his time in that country in one of his many interviews, and not necessarily just the one whose authenticity is debatable.

Haha, you can never just admit when you were proven wrong on a point. Keep on dissembling.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

.

Haha, you can never just admit when you were proven wrong on a point. Keep on dissembling.

Now if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

.

Haha, you can never just admit when you were proven wrong on a point. Keep on dissembling.

Now if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is

I admit when I'm proven wrong. You just haven't proven anything lately.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

.

Haha, you can never just admit when you were proven wrong on a point. Keep on dissembling.

Now if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is

I admit when I'm proven wrong. You just haven't proven anything lately.


You have been wrong about nearly every aspect of the Ukraine war.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

.

Haha, you can never just admit when you were proven wrong on a point. Keep on dissembling.

Now if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is

I admit when I'm proven wrong. You just haven't proven anything lately.


You have been wrong about nearly every aspect of the Ukraine war.

What have you proven me wrong about?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

.

Haha, you can never just admit when you were proven wrong on a point. Keep on dissembling.

Now if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is

I admit when I'm proven wrong. You just haven't proven anything lately.


You have been wrong about nearly every aspect of the Ukraine war.

What have you proven me wrong about?


You know the answer, you just like to argue. The conduct of this war, level of losses in Ukraine, lack of popularity of the war in Ukraine, the level of corruption in Ukraine (no, it's nothing like in Russia or anywhere else in Europe), Russian motives and so forth.

Guys who were very emotionally invested into this war like Unit2Sucks no longer post here because their takes, which were aligned with yours, have been proven to be irrational and wrong.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

.

Haha, you can never just admit when you were proven wrong on a point. Keep on dissembling.

Now if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is

I admit when I'm proven wrong. You just haven't proven anything lately.


You have been wrong about nearly every aspect of the Ukraine war.

What have you proven me wrong about?


You know the answer, you just like to argue. The conduct of this war, level of losses in Ukraine, lack of popularity of the war in Ukraine, the level of corruption in Ukraine (no, it's nothing like in Russia or anywhere else in Europe), Russian motives and so forth.

Guys who were very emotionally invested into this war like Unit2Sucks no longer post here because their takes, which were aligned with yours, have been proven to be irrational and wrong.

Point to the specific claim I made and where it is disproven. I did that for you (the fake interview you shared).
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

.

Haha, you can never just admit when you were proven wrong on a point. Keep on dissembling.

Now if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is

I admit when I'm proven wrong. You just haven't proven anything lately.


You have been wrong about nearly every aspect of the Ukraine war.

What have you proven me wrong about?


You know the answer, you just like to argue. The conduct of this war, level of losses in Ukraine, lack of popularity of the war in Ukraine, the level of corruption in Ukraine (no, it's nothing like in Russia or anywhere else in Europe), Russian motives and so forth.

Guys who were very emotionally invested into this war like Unit2Sucks no longer post here because their takes, which were aligned with yours, have been proven to be irrational and wrong.

Point to the specific claim I made and where it is disproven. I did that for you (the fake interview you shared).


One example among many- you've long argued that it was the Russians that broke the Minsk Agreements, before Francois Hollande, Angela Merkel and former Ukrainian president Poroshenko all came out and stated outright that they never had the intention of respecting the MA.

There would be many more items to dig out from this 366 page thread, but I would rather not waste more time on this.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

.

Haha, you can never just admit when you were proven wrong on a point. Keep on dissembling.

Now if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is

I admit when I'm proven wrong. You just haven't proven anything lately.


You have been wrong about nearly every aspect of the Ukraine war.

What have you proven me wrong about?


You know the answer, you just like to argue. The conduct of this war, level of losses in Ukraine, lack of popularity of the war in Ukraine, the level of corruption in Ukraine (no, it's nothing like in Russia or anywhere else in Europe), Russian motives and so forth.

Guys who were very emotionally invested into this war like Unit2Sucks no longer post here because their takes, which were aligned with yours, have been proven to be irrational and wrong.

Point to the specific claim I made and where it is disproven. I did that for you (the fake interview you shared).


One example among many- you've long argued that it was the Russians that broke the Minsk Agreements, before Francois Hollande, Angela Merkel and former Ukrainian president Poroshenko all came out and stated outright that they never had the intention of respecting the MA.

There would be many more items to dig out from this 366 page thread, but I would rather not waste more time on this.

Here, I'll use the same AI response you did.

Quote:

Russia violated the Minsk Agreements by engaging in a long history of aggression, escalating the conflict with forces and equipment, disregarding ceasefires and withdrawing troops, and holding illegal "elections" in occupied territories. Russia's direct involvement with armed groups, military units, and its refusal to follow the agreements' terms like pulling back from the front lines led to its failure to achieve its goals and the eventual full-scale invasion.

Specific violations by Russia:
  • Disregarding ceasefires: Russia and Russian-backed forces repeatedly violated the ceasefire, which was one of the primary terms of both the Minsk I and Minsk II agreements.
  • Continuing military operations: Russia did not withdraw its military forces from eastern Ukraine as required by the agreements, even after signing the Minsk II accord.
  • Providing military support: Russia supplied armed groups in the Donbas region with heavy weaponry and reinforcements, including tanks and artillery.
  • Holding illegal elections: In November 2014, Russia and the separatists held "national" elections in the self-proclaimed republics, which was a direct violation of the Minsk agreement's provision for local elections under Ukrainian law.
  • Aggression and occupation: Russia's actions, such as the seizure of Debaltseve in 2015, resulted in a major loss of territory for Ukraine and directly contradicted the agreements' terms of withdrawal from conflict zones.
Outcome:
  • Failure of the Minsk Agreements: The consistent violations by Russia undermined the Minsk agreements' objectives of a peaceful resolution.
  • Continued conflict: The agreements were ultimately superseded by the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, which was in direct violation of the Minsk agreements' core principle of a peaceful settlement.


sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In all seriousness, though: none of this is "proven." The Russians say they didn't violate the agreement. Ukraine and much of the West says they did. All you have is an opinion here.

Personally, I think the fact that they invaded and started a war is pretty strong evidence that they didn't respect any peace treaty. But again: you do you.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

In all seriousness, though: none of this is "proven." The Russians say they didn't violate the agreement. Ukraine and much of the West says they did. All you have is an opinion here.

Personally, I think the fact that they invaded and started a war is pretty strong evidence that they didn't respect any peace treaty. But again: you do you.


.
The heads of state of France, Germany and Ukraine are all on record stating that they never intended to respect the Minsk Agreements. That is a whole lot more than "an opinion".
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

In all seriousness, though: none of this is "proven." The Russians say they didn't violate the agreement. Ukraine and much of the West says they did. All you have is an opinion here.

Personally, I think the fact that they invaded and started a war is pretty strong evidence that they didn't respect any peace treaty. But again: you do you.


.
The heads of state of France, Germany and Ukraine are all on record stating that they never intended to respect the Minsk Agreements. That is a whole lot more than "an opinion".

Rebuttal:

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/merkel-admitted-that-the-minsk-agreements-were-a-ruse-to-rearm-ukrainian-armed-forces/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/french-president-hollande-never-intended-to-abide-by-the-minsk-agreements/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/france-germany-failed-to-encourage-ukraines-implementation-of-the-minsk-agreements/

Merkel's statement is not saying that these nations never intended to abide by the Minsk agreement, she's saying that they never thought Russia would abide by it so they considered it a frozen conflict, and that the end result was that it bought Ukraine time. They were probably correct in that assumption.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

In all seriousness, though: none of this is "proven." The Russians say they didn't violate the agreement. Ukraine and much of the West says they did. All you have is an opinion here.

Personally, I think the fact that they invaded and started a war is pretty strong evidence that they didn't respect any peace treaty. But again: you do you.


.
The heads of state of France, Germany and Ukraine are all on record stating that they never intended to respect the Minsk Agreements. That is a whole lot more than "an opinion".

Rebuttal:

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/merkel-admitted-that-the-minsk-agreements-were-a-ruse-to-rearm-ukrainian-armed-forces/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/french-president-hollande-never-intended-to-abide-by-the-minsk-agreements/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/france-germany-failed-to-encourage-ukraines-implementation-of-the-minsk-agreements/

Merkel's statement is not saying that these nations never intended to abide by the Minsk agreement, she's saying that they never thought Russia would abide by it so they considered it a frozen conflict, and that the end result was that it bought Ukraine time. They were probably correct in that assumption.


These nations never intended to abide by the Minsk agreement. Got it.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

In all seriousness, though: none of this is "proven." The Russians say they didn't violate the agreement. Ukraine and much of the West says they did. All you have is an opinion here.

Personally, I think the fact that they invaded and started a war is pretty strong evidence that they didn't respect any peace treaty. But again: you do you.


.
The heads of state of France, Germany and Ukraine are all on record stating that they never intended to respect the Minsk Agreements. That is a whole lot more than "an opinion".

Rebuttal:

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/merkel-admitted-that-the-minsk-agreements-were-a-ruse-to-rearm-ukrainian-armed-forces/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/french-president-hollande-never-intended-to-abide-by-the-minsk-agreements/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/france-germany-failed-to-encourage-ukraines-implementation-of-the-minsk-agreements/

Merkel's statement is not saying that these nations never intended to abide by the Minsk agreement, she's saying that they never thought Russia would abide by it so they considered it a frozen conflict, and that the end result was that it bought Ukraine time. They were probably correct in that assumption.


These nations never intended to abide by the Minsk agreement. Got it.

They didn't think it would work because Russia was going to keep doing stuff anyway, but they made efforts to abide by it.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

In all seriousness, though: none of this is "proven." The Russians say they didn't violate the agreement. Ukraine and much of the West says they did. All you have is an opinion here.

Personally, I think the fact that they invaded and started a war is pretty strong evidence that they didn't respect any peace treaty. But again: you do you.


.
The heads of state of France, Germany and Ukraine are all on record stating that they never intended to respect the Minsk Agreements. That is a whole lot more than "an opinion".

Rebuttal:

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/merkel-admitted-that-the-minsk-agreements-were-a-ruse-to-rearm-ukrainian-armed-forces/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/french-president-hollande-never-intended-to-abide-by-the-minsk-agreements/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/france-germany-failed-to-encourage-ukraines-implementation-of-the-minsk-agreements/

Merkel's statement is not saying that these nations never intended to abide by the Minsk agreement, she's saying that they never thought Russia would abide by it so they considered it a frozen conflict, and that the end result was that it bought Ukraine time. They were probably correct in that assumption.


These nations never intended to abide by the Minsk agreement. Got it.

They didn't think it would work because Russia was going to keep doing stuff anyway, but they made efforts to abide by it.


So they broke the Minsk Agreements because they thought that Russia was going to break the Minsk Agreements, even though the heads of state of Ukraine, Germany and France all admitted that they were never going to abide by the MA in the first place - OK.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

In all seriousness, though: none of this is "proven." The Russians say they didn't violate the agreement. Ukraine and much of the West says they did. All you have is an opinion here.

Personally, I think the fact that they invaded and started a war is pretty strong evidence that they didn't respect any peace treaty. But again: you do you.


.
The heads of state of France, Germany and Ukraine are all on record stating that they never intended to respect the Minsk Agreements. That is a whole lot more than "an opinion".

Rebuttal:

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/merkel-admitted-that-the-minsk-agreements-were-a-ruse-to-rearm-ukrainian-armed-forces/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/french-president-hollande-never-intended-to-abide-by-the-minsk-agreements/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/france-germany-failed-to-encourage-ukraines-implementation-of-the-minsk-agreements/

Merkel's statement is not saying that these nations never intended to abide by the Minsk agreement, she's saying that they never thought Russia would abide by it so they considered it a frozen conflict, and that the end result was that it bought Ukraine time. They were probably correct in that assumption.


These nations never intended to abide by the Minsk agreement. Got it.

They didn't think it would work because Russia was going to keep doing stuff anyway, but they made efforts to abide by it.


So they broke the Minsk Agreements because they thought that Russia was going to break the Minsk Agreements, even though the heads of state of Ukraine, Germany and France all admitted that they were never going to abide by the MA in the first place - OK.

What did they do to break the Minsk agreements?

EDIT: And to be clear about this, I don't mean what they SAID about Minsk. I mean, what did they DO to break the agreement? Actions, not words.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

In all seriousness, though: none of this is "proven." The Russians say they didn't violate the agreement. Ukraine and much of the West says they did. All you have is an opinion here.

Personally, I think the fact that they invaded and started a war is pretty strong evidence that they didn't respect any peace treaty. But again: you do you.


.
The heads of state of France, Germany and Ukraine are all on record stating that they never intended to respect the Minsk Agreements. That is a whole lot more than "an opinion".

Rebuttal:

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/merkel-admitted-that-the-minsk-agreements-were-a-ruse-to-rearm-ukrainian-armed-forces/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/french-president-hollande-never-intended-to-abide-by-the-minsk-agreements/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/france-germany-failed-to-encourage-ukraines-implementation-of-the-minsk-agreements/

Merkel's statement is not saying that these nations never intended to abide by the Minsk agreement, she's saying that they never thought Russia would abide by it so they considered it a frozen conflict, and that the end result was that it bought Ukraine time. They were probably correct in that assumption.


These nations never intended to abide by the Minsk agreement. Got it.

They didn't think it would work because Russia was going to keep doing stuff anyway, but they made efforts to abide by it.


So they broke the Minsk Agreements because they thought that Russia was going to break the Minsk Agreements, even though the heads of state of Ukraine, Germany and France all admitted that they were never going to abide by the MA in the first place - OK.

What did they do to break the Minsk agreements?

EDIT: And to be clear about this, I don't mean what they SAID about Minsk. I mean, what did they DO to break the agreement? Actions, not words.

April 30, 2015
How the Senate Armed Services Committee Is Undermining Minsk II
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/how-senate-armed-services-committee-undermining-minsk-ii/

Quote:

According to FT, German diplomats expressed frustration that Kiev is "dragging its feet" in implementing the agreement. For his part, French President Franl;ois Holland has warned Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko that "the only line of conduct is the full implementation of the Minsk accord."

Yet it seems these calls for a peaceful solution to the crisis are not only falling on deaf ears, but are also purposefully being undermined, in Washington.

To wit: the same day the aforementioned troika met in Belgrade, the 28th, the Senate Armed Services Committee held a hearing on "United States Security Policy in Europe," though perhaps, given the tenor of the hearing, it should have been held under the rubric "The Russians are Coming!"

Armed Services Committee Chairman, Senator John McCain (R-AZ), got right to the point, running down a list of Russia's sinsreal and imagined. He derided the Obama administration's "so-called reset" policy and warned of Mr. Putin's "neo-imperial objectives." McCain accused Russia of violating the Minsk II cease-fire agreement and hectored NATO allies to follow the example of Poland and Estonia and increase its defense expenditures. Unbelievably, McCain closed his remarks by telling the gallery, which included a visiting delegation of Ukrainian parliamentarians, that "none of us wants to return to the Cold War."

Depressingly, there seemed to be little daylight between McCain and the committee's ranking member, Senator Jack Reed (D-RI). Both he and McCain have called on President Obama to "provide defense lethal assistance" to Ukraine. Only Senators Angus King (I-ME) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) expressed any skepticism towards the idea of sending lethal aid to Ukraine. The situation that pertains in the Washington of 2015, is in stark contrast to the previous Cold War. Today, it would seem, Democrats and Republicans are engaged in a contest of who can 'out-hawk' the other on Russia.


sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

In all seriousness, though: none of this is "proven." The Russians say they didn't violate the agreement. Ukraine and much of the West says they did. All you have is an opinion here.

Personally, I think the fact that they invaded and started a war is pretty strong evidence that they didn't respect any peace treaty. But again: you do you.


.
The heads of state of France, Germany and Ukraine are all on record stating that they never intended to respect the Minsk Agreements. That is a whole lot more than "an opinion".

Rebuttal:

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/merkel-admitted-that-the-minsk-agreements-were-a-ruse-to-rearm-ukrainian-armed-forces/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/french-president-hollande-never-intended-to-abide-by-the-minsk-agreements/

https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/france-germany-failed-to-encourage-ukraines-implementation-of-the-minsk-agreements/

Merkel's statement is not saying that these nations never intended to abide by the Minsk agreement, she's saying that they never thought Russia would abide by it so they considered it a frozen conflict, and that the end result was that it bought Ukraine time. They were probably correct in that assumption.


These nations never intended to abide by the Minsk agreement. Got it.

They didn't think it would work because Russia was going to keep doing stuff anyway, but they made efforts to abide by it.


So they broke the Minsk Agreements because they thought that Russia was going to break the Minsk Agreements, even though the heads of state of Ukraine, Germany and France all admitted that they were never going to abide by the MA in the first place - OK.

What did they do to break the Minsk agreements?

EDIT: And to be clear about this, I don't mean what they SAID about Minsk. I mean, what did they DO to break the agreement? Actions, not words.

April 30, 2015
How the Senate Armed Services Committee Is Undermining Minsk II
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/how-senate-armed-services-committee-undermining-minsk-ii/

Quote:

According to FT, German diplomats expressed frustration that Kiev is "dragging its feet" in implementing the agreement. For his part, French President Franl;ois Holland has warned Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko that "the only line of conduct is the full implementation of the Minsk accord."

Yet it seems these calls for a peaceful solution to the crisis are not only falling on deaf ears, but are also purposefully being undermined, in Washington.

To wit: the same day the aforementioned troika met in Belgrade, the 28th, the Senate Armed Services Committee held a hearing on "United States Security Policy in Europe," though perhaps, given the tenor of the hearing, it should have been held under the rubric "The Russians are Coming!"

Armed Services Committee Chairman, Senator John McCain (R-AZ), got right to the point, running down a list of Russia's sinsreal and imagined. He derided the Obama administration's "so-called reset" policy and warned of Mr. Putin's "neo-imperial objectives." McCain accused Russia of violating the Minsk II cease-fire agreement and hectored NATO allies to follow the example of Poland and Estonia and increase its defense expenditures. Unbelievably, McCain closed his remarks by telling the gallery, which included a visiting delegation of Ukrainian parliamentarians, that "none of us wants to return to the Cold War."

Depressingly, there seemed to be little daylight between McCain and the committee's ranking member, Senator Jack Reed (D-RI). Both he and McCain have called on President Obama to "provide defense lethal assistance" to Ukraine. Only Senators Angus King (I-ME) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) expressed any skepticism towards the idea of sending lethal aid to Ukraine. The situation that pertains in the Washington of 2015, is in stark contrast to the previous Cold War. Today, it would seem, Democrats and Republicans are engaged in a contest of who can 'out-hawk' the other on Russia.




Okay, so once again here I see more people talking about arming Ukraine further, but this is pretty light on specific actions.

Also, we might need to define terms. What are the Minsk terms (in your view) and how do you consider them to have been violated here?
First Page Last Page
Page 366 of 383
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.