Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

Zelenskys Army of the Dead.

All invisible to the vile War Mongers of the EU and NATO.

You won't see this on the BBC or CNN, they are too busy trying to convince you this hell has to continue at any cost (once its Ukrainian) pic.twitter.com/qqOzNrF6pJ

— Chay Bowes (@BowesChay) April 16, 2026

---

I think the real war mongers are the one who started the war (Russia).

---

NATO chief confirms that the Ukraine war started in 2014:

---

Yes, when Russia annexed Crimea.

---

Russia annexed Crimea peacefully, through a referendum

---

No they didn't.

---

Remember the NBC News interview in Crimea asking people whether Crimea was Russian or Ukrainian? Zelensky and the entire Ukrainian military should watch this interview before even thinking of setting foot in Crimea.
pic.twitter.com/Xl7jijL3kC

— Gabriel (@GabeZZOZZ) April 24, 2025

Quote:

---

According to the 2014 census by occupation authorities, 84% of Crimean inhabitants named Russian as their native language; 7.9% named Crimean Tatar; 3.7% Tatar and 3.3% Ukrainian.

---

---

The referendum came after Russian troops (originally denying they were Russian, but now it's pretty much admitted they were) seized a bunch of military and government buildings at gunpoint. No one got to vote on secession before the occupation had already started. That's not peaceful. A referendum vote held AFTER Russia already took over the territory cannot be considered valid or trustworthy.

I don't care about what language people speak or what random people on the street say, that doesn't prove anything about a legitimate process.

---

That is the problem, your take is very naive and misinformed, largely based on negative stereotypes about Russians.

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

Zelenskys Army of the Dead.

All invisible to the vile War Mongers of the EU and NATO.

You won't see this on the BBC or CNN, they are too busy trying to convince you this hell has to continue at any cost (once its Ukrainian) pic.twitter.com/qqOzNrF6pJ

— Chay Bowes (@BowesChay) April 16, 2026

---

I think the real war mongers are the one who started the war (Russia).

---

NATO chief confirms that the Ukraine war started in 2014:

---

Yes, when Russia annexed Crimea.

---

Russia annexed Crimea peacefully, through a referendum

---

No they didn't.

---

Remember the NBC News interview in Crimea asking people whether Crimea was Russian or Ukrainian? Zelensky and the entire Ukrainian military should watch this interview before even thinking of setting foot in Crimea.
pic.twitter.com/Xl7jijL3kC

— Gabriel (@GabeZZOZZ) April 24, 2025

Quote:

---

According to the 2014 census by occupation authorities, 84% of Crimean inhabitants named Russian as their native language; 7.9% named Crimean Tatar; 3.7% Tatar and 3.3% Ukrainian.

---

---

The referendum came after Russian troops (originally denying they were Russian, but now it's pretty much admitted they were) seized a bunch of military and government buildings at gunpoint. No one got to vote on secession before the occupation had already started. That's not peaceful. A referendum vote held AFTER Russia already took over the territory cannot be considered valid or trustworthy.

I don't care about what language people speak or what random people on the street say, that doesn't prove anything about a legitimate process.

---

That is the problem, your take is very naive and misinformed, largely based on negative stereotypes about Russians.

---

No, it's based on the facts of what happened, a.k.a. Russia invading and taking various parts of Ukraine without anyone getting a chance to vote on it beforehand. They are the invaders. This has nothing to do with the Russian people, it's the actions of their government.

You want to make it about stereotypes or bigotry or something because it makes it easier for you to defend Putin (or oppose America, I'm not sure which).

---

It is the locals, people from the Donbas, Crimea and SE Ukraine to say who is the invader. You keep ignoring the history of the region, its ethnic composition, and how territories changed sides under Lenin and Khrushchev, the very basic nature of post-Soviet Ukraine:



What we did to Ukraine was incredibly cynical and cruel, putting in charge the most radical Bandera-worshipping nationalists in Kiev all but insuring a bloody civil war, one that has very predictably led Ukraine and nearly 2 million of their men to their destruction.

Reducing this to "opposing America" or being a Putin toadie is incredibly reductive and naive.

Quote:

---

Not a fan of the forced conscription, but it's worth noting that none of that would be happening if Russia had not invaded.

---

Ukrainian leadership could have stopped the war anytime they wanted, even today, instead of throwing thousands of fresh bodies into the meat grinder every month, they simply don't give a crap about their people. That leadership is a mix of fanatical Banderists and corrupt war profiteers, with some naive Ukrainians who thing that they are going to beat Russia militarily with Nato's help. These people are now stuck in the middle and powerless in front of the Banderist junta.

---

movielover said:

---

Do you send Victoria Nuland Christmas cards?

---

Cal88 said:

---

What we did to Ukraine was incredibly cynical and cruel

---

calpoly said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

Zelenskys Army of the Dead.

All invisible to the vile War Mongers of the EU and NATO.

You won't see this on the BBC or CNN, they are too busy trying to convince you this hell has to continue at any cost (once its Ukrainian) pic.twitter.com/qqOzNrF6pJ

— Chay Bowes (@BowesChay) April 16, 2026

---

I think the real war mongers are the one who started the war (Russia).

---

NATO chief confirms that the Ukraine war started in 2014:

---

Yes, when Russia annexed Crimea.

---

Russia annexed Crimea peacefully, through a referendum

---

No they didn't.

---

Remember the NBC News interview in Crimea asking people whether Crimea was Russian or Ukrainian? Zelensky and the entire Ukrainian military should watch this interview before even thinking of setting foot in Crimea.
pic.twitter.com/Xl7jijL3kC

— Gabriel (@GabeZZOZZ) April 24, 2025

Quote:

---

According to the 2014 census by occupation authorities, 84% of Crimean inhabitants named Russian as their native language; 7.9% named Crimean Tatar; 3.7% Tatar and 3.3% Ukrainian.

---

---

The referendum came after Russian troops (originally denying they were Russian, but now it's pretty much admitted they were) seized a bunch of military and government buildings at gunpoint. No one got to vote on secession before the occupation had already started. That's not peaceful. A referendum vote held AFTER Russia already took over the territory cannot be considered valid or trustworthy.

I don't care about what language people speak or what random people on the street say, that doesn't prove anything about a legitimate process.

---

That is the problem, your take is very naive and misinformed, largely based on negative stereotypes about Russians.

---

No, it's based on the facts of what happened, a.k.a. Russia invading and taking various parts of Ukraine without anyone getting a chance to vote on it beforehand. They are the invaders. This has nothing to do with the Russian people, it's the actions of their government.

You want to make it about stereotypes or bigotry or something because it makes it easier for you to defend Putin (or oppose America, I'm not sure which).

---

It is the locals, people from the Donbas, Crimea and SE Ukraine to say who is the invader. You keep ignoring the history of the region, its ethnic composition, and how territories changed sides under Lenin and Khrushchev, the very basic nature of post-Soviet Ukraine:



What we did to Ukraine was incredibly cynical and cruel, putting in charge the most radical Bandera-worshipping nationalists in Kiev all but insuring a bloody civil war, one that has very predictably led Ukraine and nearly 2 million of their men to their destruction.

Reducing this to "opposing America" or being a Putin toadie is incredibly reductive and naive.

Quote:

---

Not a fan of the forced conscription, but it's worth noting that none of that would be happening if Russia had not invaded.

---

Ukrainian leadership could have stopped the war anytime they wanted, even today, instead of throwing thousands of fresh bodies into the meat grinder every month, they simply don't give a crap about their people. That leadership is a mix of fanatical Banderists and corrupt war profiteers, with some naive Ukrainians who thing that they are going to beat Russia militarily with Nato's help. These people are now stuck in the middle and powerless in front of the Banderist junta.

---

Give it a rest and stop shilling for Putin. It's amazing to me that you love that Putin invaded another country unprovoked but you hate Israel is has done in Gaza.

---

sycasey said:

---

movielover said:

---

Do you send Victoria Nuland Christmas cards?

---

The way you guys fixate on her has always been bizarre to me. Nothing Nuland did forced Russia to start taking pieces of Ukraine.

---

calpoly said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

Zelenskys Army of the Dead.

All invisible to the vile War Mongers of the EU and NATO.

You won't see this on the BBC or CNN, they are too busy trying to convince you this hell has to continue at any cost (once its Ukrainian) pic.twitter.com/qqOzNrF6pJ

— Chay Bowes (@BowesChay) April 16, 2026

---

I think the real war mongers are the one who started the war (Russia).

---

NATO chief confirms that the Ukraine war started in 2014:

---

Yes, when Russia annexed Crimea.

---

Russia annexed Crimea peacefully, through a referendum

---

No they didn't.

---

Remember the NBC News interview in Crimea asking people whether Crimea was Russian or Ukrainian? Zelensky and the entire Ukrainian military should watch this interview before even thinking of setting foot in Crimea.
pic.twitter.com/Xl7jijL3kC

— Gabriel (@GabeZZOZZ) April 24, 2025

Quote:

---

According to the 2014 census by occupation authorities, 84% of Crimean inhabitants named Russian as their native language; 7.9% named Crimean Tatar; 3.7% Tatar and 3.3% Ukrainian.

---

---

The referendum came after Russian troops (originally denying they were Russian, but now it's pretty much admitted they were) seized a bunch of military and government buildings at gunpoint. No one got to vote on secession before the occupation had already started. That's not peaceful. A referendum vote held AFTER Russia already took over the territory cannot be considered valid or trustworthy.

I don't care about what language people speak or what random people on the street say, that doesn't prove anything about a legitimate process.

---

That is the problem, your take is very naive and misinformed, largely based on negative stereotypes about Russians.

---

No, it's based on the facts of what happened, a.k.a. Russia invading and taking various parts of Ukraine without anyone getting a chance to vote on it beforehand. They are the invaders. This has nothing to do with the Russian people, it's the actions of their government.

You want to make it about stereotypes or bigotry or something because it makes it easier for you to defend Putin (or oppose America, I'm not sure which).

---

It is the locals, people from the Donbas, Crimea and SE Ukraine to say who is the invader. You keep ignoring the history of the region, its ethnic composition, and how territories changed sides under Lenin and Khrushchev, the very basic nature of post-Soviet Ukraine:



What we did to Ukraine was incredibly cynical and cruel, putting in charge the most radical Bandera-worshipping nationalists in Kiev all but insuring a bloody civil war, one that has very predictably led Ukraine and nearly 2 million of their men to their destruction.

Reducing this to "opposing America" or being a Putin toadie is incredibly reductive and naive.

Quote:

---

Not a fan of the forced conscription, but it's worth noting that none of that would be happening if Russia had not invaded.

---

Ukrainian leadership could have stopped the war anytime they wanted, even today, instead of throwing thousands of fresh bodies into the meat grinder every month, they simply don't give a crap about their people. That leadership is a mix of fanatical Banderists and corrupt war profiteers, with some naive Ukrainians who thing that they are going to beat Russia militarily with Nato's help. These people are now stuck in the middle and powerless in front of the Banderist junta.

---

Give it a rest and stop shilling for Putin. It's amazing to me that you love that Putin invaded another country unprovoked but you hate Israel is has done in Gaza.

---

Cal88 said:

---

Russia did not want to take pieces from Ukraine

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

calpoly said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

Zelenskys Army of the Dead.

All invisible to the vile War Mongers of the EU and NATO.

You won't see this on the BBC or CNN, they are too busy trying to convince you this hell has to continue at any cost (once its Ukrainian) pic.twitter.com/qqOzNrF6pJ

— Chay Bowes (@BowesChay) April 16, 2026

---

I think the real war mongers are the one who started the war (Russia).

---

NATO chief confirms that the Ukraine war started in 2014:

---

Yes, when Russia annexed Crimea.

---

Russia annexed Crimea peacefully, through a referendum

---

No they didn't.

---

Remember the NBC News interview in Crimea asking people whether Crimea was Russian or Ukrainian? Zelensky and the entire Ukrainian military should watch this interview before even thinking of setting foot in Crimea.
pic.twitter.com/Xl7jijL3kC

— Gabriel (@GabeZZOZZ) April 24, 2025

Quote:

---

According to the 2014 census by occupation authorities, 84% of Crimean inhabitants named Russian as their native language; 7.9% named Crimean Tatar; 3.7% Tatar and 3.3% Ukrainian.

---

---

The referendum came after Russian troops (originally denying they were Russian, but now it's pretty much admitted they were) seized a bunch of military and government buildings at gunpoint. No one got to vote on secession before the occupation had already started. That's not peaceful. A referendum vote held AFTER Russia already took over the territory cannot be considered valid or trustworthy.

I don't care about what language people speak or what random people on the street say, that doesn't prove anything about a legitimate process.

---

That is the problem, your take is very naive and misinformed, largely based on negative stereotypes about Russians.

---

No, it's based on the facts of what happened, a.k.a. Russia invading and taking various parts of Ukraine without anyone getting a chance to vote on it beforehand. They are the invaders. This has nothing to do with the Russian people, it's the actions of their government.

You want to make it about stereotypes or bigotry or something because it makes it easier for you to defend Putin (or oppose America, I'm not sure which).

---

It is the locals, people from the Donbas, Crimea and SE Ukraine to say who is the invader. You keep ignoring the history of the region, its ethnic composition, and how territories changed sides under Lenin and Khrushchev, the very basic nature of post-Soviet Ukraine:



What we did to Ukraine was incredibly cynical and cruel, putting in charge the most radical Bandera-worshipping nationalists in Kiev all but insuring a bloody civil war, one that has very predictably led Ukraine and nearly 2 million of their men to their destruction.

Reducing this to "opposing America" or being a Putin toadie is incredibly reductive and naive.

Quote:

---

Not a fan of the forced conscription, but it's worth noting that none of that would be happening if Russia had not invaded.

---

Ukrainian leadership could have stopped the war anytime they wanted, even today, instead of throwing thousands of fresh bodies into the meat grinder every month, they simply don't give a crap about their people. That leadership is a mix of fanatical Banderists and corrupt war profiteers, with some naive Ukrainians who thing that they are going to beat Russia militarily with Nato's help. These people are now stuck in the middle and powerless in front of the Banderist junta.

---

Give it a rest and stop shilling for Putin. It's amazing to me that you love that Putin invaded another country unprovoked but you hate Israel is has done in Gaza.

---

The only difference is that the US is allied with Israel but not with Russia. It's America Bad logic all the way down.

Russia, of course, has no agency at all according to them.

---

If Russia started bombing and double-tapping girls schools in Ukraine, or deliberately targeting civilians by the tens of thousands, killing more journalists in Gaza than all the journalists who died in WW11 and WW2 combined, executing and burying medical staff, sniping hundreds of kids in the head, burrying kids alive, as the Israelis have been documented of doing, I would certainly not hesitate to call them out.

Over 90% of Gazans killed were civilians, while less than 2% of Ukrainians killed by Russia were civilians.


Do you not see the difference here?

---

dajo9 said:

---

I never called you a NAZI, I called you a fascist

---

Cal88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

I never called you a NAZI, I called you a fascist

---

That is a deliberate lie, and you know it.

You claimed that my handle stood for "heil hitler".

That's why I have said many times that you are a man of poor character.

---

sycasey said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

I never called you a NAZI, I called you a fascist

Also your claims of being a defender of peace are hilarious considering your relentless support of Putin's invasions and wars and Trump

---

In fairness, he has clearly turned against Trump.

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

Russia did not want to take pieces from Ukraine

---

I'm going to say that Russia's actions in Ukraine belie this claim.

---

The Russians have a country that spans 11 time zones, is by orders of magnitude the richest in resources, and have a relatively small population, which still to this day hasn't fully recovered from the Bolshevik purges and WW2, which killed nearly 40-50 million. They don't lust for territorial conquest, their leadership is instead obsessed with the defense of such a large territory with no physical barriers or natural borders, and a long history of being invaded from the west.

The Russians have offered in April 2022, when they were far deeper into Ukraine and held a lot more Ukrainian territory to withdraw from all the territories they occupied in exchange for Ukrainian neutrality (no NATO), limits on their military and autonomy for the Donbas within a federal Ukrainian framework. This completely belies your claim of the Russian being primarily motivated by land conquest.

---

dajo9 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

I never called you a NAZI, I called you a fascist

Also your claims of being a defender of peace are hilarious considering your relentless support of Putin's invasions and wars and Trump

---

In fairness, he has clearly turned against Trump.

---

Every stance Cal88 takes is to weaken and divide America

---

Cal88 said:

---

So here we have an Ukrainian soldier showing how the Ukranian army uses schools to store weapons.

So the next time a western mainstream media outlet reports that Russia is attacking Ukrainian civilian infrastructure, there is more to the story than what’s being presented.... pic.twitter.com/XBzY9ni2eo

— Richard (@ricwe123) April 21, 2026

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

So here we have an Ukrainian soldier showing how the Ukranian army uses schools to store weapons.

So the next time a western mainstream media outlet reports that Russia is attacking Ukrainian civilian infrastructure, there is more to the story than what’s being presented.... pic.twitter.com/XBzY9ni2eo

— Richard (@ricwe123) April 21, 2026

---

This is the same argument Israel makes about Hamas/Gaza.

---

Yes it is and it's as weak here as there.

Best way to cut unnecessary civilian death? Solve your problems with diplomacy instead of letting the EU and US talk into a war you can't win where the odds of survival are so low that able-bodied men would rather flee the country than fight for a war that's only purpose is to enrich Ukrainian oligarchs.

---