The Traitor List

13,462 Views | 108 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by cbbass1
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm basing this solely off words and actions taken since Putin invaded Ukraine which means giving lots of people a big pass for their previous words and actions.

Tulsi Gabbard
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
General Mike Flynn
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Putin. Maybe putin Kamala in charge of Ukraine was not a good idea.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:



Putin. Maybe putin Kamala in charge of Ukraine was not a good idea.
OK, with Gabbard, Flynn and now BearForce2 self-listing, we're up to three. Good start!
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dont forget Candace Owens!
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I largely agree with Tulsi Gabbard's premise about NATO and Ukraine, although I can't blame the Biden Administration, as this chain of events began a number of administrations ago, when we first entertained the idea of Ukraine joining NATO.

Economic alliances with Ukraine, sure. Military, no. Okay, keep the remote possibility hanging over Russia's head, why not. But our stance from the beginning should have been, "At this time we have absolutely no plans or intentions for Ukraine to ever be a part of NATO".

This whole thing is a sad, unnecessary waste, although in a best-case scenario, maybe it could be a catalyst in Putin's downfall and a peaceful transition for Russia to enter the non-authoritarian-state world. Unfortunately, it looks like it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

I'm shocked -- shocked -- that a major nuclear power like Russia would use false pretenses to invade another country in an attempt to establish a more friendly regime. Any country that would do something like that obviously has bad guys at the helm. Oh, wait . . .
golden sloth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


I largely agree with Tulsi Gabbard's premise about NATO and Ukraine, although I can't blame the Biden Administration, as this chain of events began a number of administrations ago, when we first entertained the idea of Ukraine joining NATO.

Economic alliances with Ukraine, sure. Military, no. Okay, keep the remote possibility hanging over Russia's head, why not. But our stance from the beginning should have been, "At this time we have absolutely no plans or intentions for Ukraine to ever be a part of NATO".

This whole thing is a sad, unnecessary waste, although in a best-case scenario, maybe it could be a catalyst in Putin's downfall and a peaceful transition for Russia to enter the non-authoritarian-state world. Unfortunately, it looks like it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

I'm shocked -- shocked -- that a major nuclear power like Russia would use false pretenses to invade another country in an attempt to establish a more friendly regime. Any country that would do something like that obviously has bad guys at the helm. Oh, wait . . .
I disagree with Tulsi,

Ukraine is a sovereign country from Russia and as such should be allowed to enter into any agreement they choose without Russian interference. Russia does not get to dictate which alliances a different sovereign country should be a part of. The truth of the matter is Russia should have been able to make a strong case for Ukraine to align themselves economically and strategically with Russia rather than the west, Russia failed to make a compelling case. Now they have to resort to an invasion, overthrowing the legitimate government of Ukraine, and installing a puppet regime to achieve their objectives. Russia chose to do this, they were not forced to do this.

Furthermore, NATO expansion had nothing to do with Russia gaining control of the Caucus' by intervening in the Azerbaijan / Armenia dispute or with intervening in the uprising in Kazakhstan.
.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Do you think Russia would have invaded if Trump was still President?

I don't think so, because Trump is just as crazy as Putin.

Besides, Trump would sing Putin's praises.

dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:


Do you think Russia would have invaded if Trump was still President?

I don't think so, because Trump is just as crazy as Putin.

Besides, Trump would sing Putin's praises.




Putin had Trump working on dismantling NATO. With Trump the big prize was in reach. Without Trump, Putin has to settle for border expansion.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
golden sloth said:

Big C said:


I largely agree with Tulsi Gabbard's premise about NATO and Ukraine, although I can't blame the Biden Administration, as this chain of events began a number of administrations ago, when we first entertained the idea of Ukraine joining NATO.

Economic alliances with Ukraine, sure. Military, no. Okay, keep the remote possibility hanging over Russia's head, why not. But our stance from the beginning should have been, "At this time we have absolutely no plans or intentions for Ukraine to ever be a part of NATO".

This whole thing is a sad, unnecessary waste, although in a best-case scenario, maybe it could be a catalyst in Putin's downfall and a peaceful transition for Russia to enter the non-authoritarian-state world. Unfortunately, it looks like it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

I'm shocked -- shocked -- that a major nuclear power like Russia would use false pretenses to invade another country in an attempt to establish a more friendly regime. Any country that would do something like that obviously has bad guys at the helm. Oh, wait . . .
I disagree with Tulsi,

Ukraine is a sovereign country from Russia and as such should be allowed to enter into any agreement they choose without Russian interference. Russia does not get to dictate which alliances a different sovereign country should be a part of. The truth of the matter is Russia should have been able to make a strong case for Ukraine to align themselves economically and strategically with Russia rather than the west, Russia failed to make a compelling case. Now they have to resort to an invasion, overthrowing the legitimate government of Ukraine, and installing a puppet regime to achieve their objectives. Russia chose to do this, they were not forced to do this.

Furthermore, NATO expansion had nothing to do with Russia gaining control of the Caucus' by intervening in the Azerbaijan / Armenia dispute or with intervening in the uprising in Kazakhstan.
.

You touch on an interesting question: What do the people of Ukraine really want?

I knew a number of Ukrainians who came to the US in the '90s. For the most part, they were Jewish people that came here as refugees, but were largely seeking economic opportunity.

The population of Ukraine has had quite a bit of intermingling between "native Ukrainians" and Russians, over the past 100 years and even before that. My sense is that their concerns are pragmatic ones: Stability and economic opportunity... and outside of that they don't particularly care if they are more closely aligned with points west or east.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lauren Witzke

I got a new phone and now can't copy links in here, but look up Lauren Witzke, the Delaware Republican Senate candidate and traitor to America.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:


Do you think Russia would have invaded if Trump was still President?

I don't think so, because Trump is just as crazy as Putin.

Besides, Trump would sing Putin's praises.



Both Trump and Biden are largely irrelevant in the current situation. The questions that are relevant are:

- What do the people of Ukraine really want and how badly do they want it?

- What do the people of Russia really want and how badly do they want it?

- How out-of-touch and just plain bull-goose-looney is Vladimir Putin and, if push came to shove, could the controls be rested from him? I have a hard time believing that the oligarchs are enjoying this turn of events. I assume we are reaching out to them, back channels.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tulsi Gabbard Is Being Used by the Russians, and to a Former US Double Agent, the Evidence Is Clear | Opinion


https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-being-used-russians-former-us-double-agent-evidence-clear-opinion-1466750

Tulsi Gabbard drops lawsuit against Hillary Clinton for calling her a 'Russian asset'


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8363119/Tulsi-Gabbard-drops-lawsuit-against-Hillary-Clinton-calling-Russian-asset.html
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Lauren Witzke

I got a new phone and now can't copy links in here, but look up Lauren Witzke, the Delaware Republican Senate candidate and traitor to America.

I googled her. She is a far-right nut job, but I didn't see what she said about all this.

dajo, you're bandying about the word "traitor" a lot: Can you define who the traitors are in all this? Was my Representative in Congress, Barbara Lee, a traitor when she was the only member of Congress to come out against US involvement in Afghanistan after 9/11?

Where I'm at right now:

Putin: bad
Biden: doing what he has to do
Others: entitled to their opinions
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

I'm basing this solely off words and actions taken since Putin invaded Ukraine which means giving lots of people a big pass for their previous words and actions.

Tulsi Gabbard



Wow.
That's the worst thing I can ever recall her saying.

"Sorry, Ukraine, but you're F'd because of your 'buffer' geography."
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

dimitrig said:


Do you think Russia would have invaded if Trump was still President?

I don't think so, because Trump is just as crazy as Putin.

Besides, Trump would sing Putin's praises.



Both Trump and Biden are largely irrelevant in the current situation. The questions that are relevant are:

- What do the people of Ukraine really want and how badly do they want it?

- What do the people of Russia really want and how badly do they want it?


- How out-of-touch and just plain bull-goose-looney is Vladimir Putin and, if push came to shove, could the controls be rested from him? I have a hard time believing that the oligarchs are enjoying this turn of events. I assume we are reaching out to them, back channels.


It's not a question of how badly someone wants something. Slaves wanted freedom real bad, but the whites had all the guns!
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Big C said:

dimitrig said:


Do you think Russia would have invaded if Trump was still President?

I don't think so, because Trump is just as crazy as Putin.

Besides, Trump would sing Putin's praises.



Both Trump and Biden are largely irrelevant in the current situation. The questions that are relevant are:

- What do the people of Ukraine really want and how badly do they want it?

- What do the people of Russia really want and how badly do they want it?


- How out-of-touch and just plain bull-goose-looney is Vladimir Putin and, if push came to shove, could the controls be rested from him? I have a hard time believing that the oligarchs are enjoying this turn of events. I assume we are reaching out to them, back channels.


It's not a question of how badly someone wants something. Slaves wanted freedom real bad, but the whites had all the guns!

You are applying historical comparisons (slavery, Sudetenland, etc.), which are not, IMO, valid.

The Ukrainians have plenty of guns. If they want to resist indefinitely, what can Russia possibly do? It's one thing to go in and take over, but what then? See Russia in Afghanistan, U.S. in Afghanistan, U.S. in Iraq, etc.

But no question that this whole thing is a lose-lose for everybody.
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

golden sloth said:

Big C said:


I largely agree with Tulsi Gabbard's premise about NATO and Ukraine, although I can't blame the Biden Administration, as this chain of events began a number of administrations ago, when we first entertained the idea of Ukraine joining NATO.

Economic alliances with Ukraine, sure. Military, no. Okay, keep the remote possibility hanging over Russia's head, why not. But our stance from the beginning should have been, "At this time we have absolutely no plans or intentions for Ukraine to ever be a part of NATO".

This whole thing is a sad, unnecessary waste, although in a best-case scenario, maybe it could be a catalyst in Putin's downfall and a peaceful transition for Russia to enter the non-authoritarian-state world. Unfortunately, it looks like it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

I'm shocked -- shocked -- that a major nuclear power like Russia would use false pretenses to invade another country in an attempt to establish a more friendly regime. Any country that would do something like that obviously has bad guys at the helm. Oh, wait . . .
I disagree with Tulsi,

Ukraine is a sovereign country from Russia and as such should be allowed to enter into any agreement they choose without Russian interference. Russia does not get to dictate which alliances a different sovereign country should be a part of. The truth of the matter is Russia should have been able to make a strong case for Ukraine to align themselves economically and strategically with Russia rather than the west, Russia failed to make a compelling case. Now they have to resort to an invasion, overthrowing the legitimate government of Ukraine, and installing a puppet regime to achieve their objectives. Russia chose to do this, they were not forced to do this.

Furthermore, NATO expansion had nothing to do with Russia gaining control of the Caucus' by intervening in the Azerbaijan / Armenia dispute or with intervening in the uprising in Kazakhstan.
.

You touch on an interesting question: What do the people of Ukraine really want?

I knew a number of Ukrainians who came to the US in the '90s. For the most part, they were Jewish people that came here as refugees, but were largely seeking economic opportunity.

The population of Ukraine has had quite a bit of intermingling between "native Ukrainians" and Russians, over the past 100 years and even before that. My sense is that their concerns are pragmatic ones: Stability and economic opportunity... and outside of that they don't particularly care if they are more closely aligned with points west or east.


As a half Ukrainian with family there and having been there I can tell you you are way off. Ukrainians are extremely proud of their independence and do NOT want Russian occupation or control. Sure there are pockets of fringe Putin love, but just like here
The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

dajo9 said:

Lauren Witzke

I got a new phone and now can't copy links in here, but look up Lauren Witzke, the Delaware Republican Senate candidate and traitor to America.

I googled her. She is a far-right nut job, but I didn't see what she said about all this.

dajo, you're bandying about the word "traitor" a lot: Can you define who the traitors are in all this? Was my Representative in Congress, Barbara Lee, a traitor when she was the only member of Congress to come out against US involvement in Afghanistan after 9/11?

Where I'm at right now:

Putin: bad
Biden: doing what he has to do
Others: entitled to their opinions


Lauren Witzke


Putin attacked us in 2016. He continues to attack us to this day. Americans who boost Putin or degrade us relative to Putin are traitors.

Barbara Lee made one of the worst votes in my lifetime but I don't recall her boosting the Taliban or bin Laden.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:


At least Matt Taibbi has the sense to admit he was wrong. Here is Glenn Greenwald out here whining that people are getting the public condemnation they deserve for aiding and abetting a madman Russian imperialist.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:


Do you think Russia would have invaded if Trump was still President?

I don't think so, because Trump is just as crazy as Putin.

Besides, Trump would sing Putin's praises.



You've got to be kidding.
Trump was constantly bashing NATO and looking to dismantle it.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dimitrig said:


Do you think Russia would have invaded if Trump was still President?

I don't think so, because Trump is just as crazy as Putin.

Besides, Trump would sing Putin's praises.



You've got to be kidding.
Trump was constantly bashing NATO and looking to dismantle it.



https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/12/03/three-charts-that-show-why-trump-thinks-nato-is-a-bad-deal.html
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What I meant was the much larger Russian army is going to roll Ukraine

How is this different from Sudetenland?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

What I meant was the much larger Russian army is going to roll Ukraine

How is this different from Sudetenland?


Hitler didn't have nukes
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:


Lauren Witzke



"Christianity" for these phonies is any person or movement that has the physical appearance of white wholesome 1950s supremacy where gays were invisible and people didn't have to talk about sex...and NOTHING to do with Christ's teachings on the poor, indigent, violence, the state, kindness, peace, etc. It's plastic Anita Bryant christianity willing to align with murderers and bigots and exploiters as long as they dress well, smile, mention God, exercise tribal loyalty, shun out groups, and profess to have read the Bible.

Faith as obedience rather than a spiritual journey of empathy and generosity.
The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld said:


"Christianity" for these phonies is any person or movement that has the physical appearance of white wholesome 1950s supremacy where gays were invisible and people didn't have to talk about sex...and NOTHING to do with Christ's teachings on the poor, indigent, violence, the state, kindness, peace, etc. It's plastic Anita Bryant christianity willing to align with murderers and bigots and exploiters as long as they dress well, smile, mention God, exercise tribal loyalty, shun out groups, and profess to have read the Bible.

Faith as obedience rather than a spiritual journey of empathy and generosity.

Even though that was the typical 1950's playbook for the Religious White back then, I still see it in evidence today. As you point out, it's terribly tribal. And you are still taught to obey and shut out other groups. The "Kool-Aid" is still as strong as it was back in the 50's. - - - It's literally a cult.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

MinotStateBeav said:


At least Matt Taibbi has the sense to admit he was wrong. Here is Glenn Greenwald out here whining that people are getting the public condemnation they deserve for aiding and abetting a madman Russian imperialist.

Greenwald goes on the traitor list for sure. I was glad to see this accountability from Taibbi, as I still had some lingering respect for him.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld said:

Big C said:

golden sloth said:

Big C said:


I largely agree with Tulsi Gabbard's premise about NATO and Ukraine, although I can't blame the Biden Administration, as this chain of events began a number of administrations ago, when we first entertained the idea of Ukraine joining NATO.

Economic alliances with Ukraine, sure. Military, no. Okay, keep the remote possibility hanging over Russia's head, why not. But our stance from the beginning should have been, "At this time we have absolutely no plans or intentions for Ukraine to ever be a part of NATO".

This whole thing is a sad, unnecessary waste, although in a best-case scenario, maybe it could be a catalyst in Putin's downfall and a peaceful transition for Russia to enter the non-authoritarian-state world. Unfortunately, it looks like it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

I'm shocked -- shocked -- that a major nuclear power like Russia would use false pretenses to invade another country in an attempt to establish a more friendly regime. Any country that would do something like that obviously has bad guys at the helm. Oh, wait . . .
I disagree with Tulsi,

Ukraine is a sovereign country from Russia and as such should be allowed to enter into any agreement they choose without Russian interference. Russia does not get to dictate which alliances a different sovereign country should be a part of. The truth of the matter is Russia should have been able to make a strong case for Ukraine to align themselves economically and strategically with Russia rather than the west, Russia failed to make a compelling case. Now they have to resort to an invasion, overthrowing the legitimate government of Ukraine, and installing a puppet regime to achieve their objectives. Russia chose to do this, they were not forced to do this.

Furthermore, NATO expansion had nothing to do with Russia gaining control of the Caucus' by intervening in the Azerbaijan / Armenia dispute or with intervening in the uprising in Kazakhstan.
.

You touch on an interesting question: What do the people of Ukraine really want?

I knew a number of Ukrainians who came to the US in the '90s. For the most part, they were Jewish people that came here as refugees, but were largely seeking economic opportunity.

The population of Ukraine has had quite a bit of intermingling between "native Ukrainians" and Russians, over the past 100 years and even before that. My sense is that their concerns are pragmatic ones: Stability and economic opportunity... and outside of that they don't particularly care if they are more closely aligned with points west or east.


As a half Ukrainian with family there and having been there I can tell you you are way off. Ukrainians are extremely proud of their independence and do NOT want Russian occupation or control. Sure there are pockets of fringe Putin love, but just like here
Ukraine had an uprising and a revolution when their President decided to side with Putin over the West (don't let any one tell you this was a US-backed coup, that isn't true). The current President who was popularly elected (Zelensky) said he was in favor of NATO and EU membership during the campaign. They clearly do not want to be aligned with Russia.
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Lauren Witzke

I got a new phone and now can't copy links in here, but look up Lauren Witzke, the Delaware Republican Senate candidate and traitor to America.
thanks for the headsup
signed, no cell ever / landlines R us
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lauren_Witzke#Political_views
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld said:

Big C said:

golden sloth said:

Big C said:


I largely agree with Tulsi Gabbard's premise about NATO and Ukraine, although I can't blame the Biden Administration, as this chain of events began a number of administrations ago, when we first entertained the idea of Ukraine joining NATO.

Economic alliances with Ukraine, sure. Military, no. Okay, keep the remote possibility hanging over Russia's head, why not. But our stance from the beginning should have been, "At this time we have absolutely no plans or intentions for Ukraine to ever be a part of NATO".

This whole thing is a sad, unnecessary waste, although in a best-case scenario, maybe it could be a catalyst in Putin's downfall and a peaceful transition for Russia to enter the non-authoritarian-state world. Unfortunately, it looks like it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

I'm shocked -- shocked -- that a major nuclear power like Russia would use false pretenses to invade another country in an attempt to establish a more friendly regime. Any country that would do something like that obviously has bad guys at the helm. Oh, wait . . .
I disagree with Tulsi,

Ukraine is a sovereign country from Russia and as such should be allowed to enter into any agreement they choose without Russian interference. Russia does not get to dictate which alliances a different sovereign country should be a part of. The truth of the matter is Russia should have been able to make a strong case for Ukraine to align themselves economically and strategically with Russia rather than the west, Russia failed to make a compelling case. Now they have to resort to an invasion, overthrowing the legitimate government of Ukraine, and installing a puppet regime to achieve their objectives. Russia chose to do this, they were not forced to do this.

Furthermore, NATO expansion had nothing to do with Russia gaining control of the Caucus' by intervening in the Azerbaijan / Armenia dispute or with intervening in the uprising in Kazakhstan.
.

You touch on an interesting question: What do the people of Ukraine really want?

I knew a number of Ukrainians who came to the US in the '90s. For the most part, they were Jewish people that came here as refugees, but were largely seeking economic opportunity.

The population of Ukraine has had quite a bit of intermingling between "native Ukrainians" and Russians, over the past 100 years and even before that. My sense is that their concerns are pragmatic ones: Stability and economic opportunity... and outside of that they don't particularly care if they are more closely aligned with points west or east.


As a half Ukrainian with family there and having been there I can tell you you are way off. Ukrainians are extremely proud of their independence and do NOT want Russian occupation or control. Sure there are pockets of fringe Putin love, but just like here

blungld, you may have assumed I was making a point that I was not making. No, I do not believe that Ukrainians in the 21st century "want Russian occupation or control" at all. (Especially now!)

I would be interested in more of your "insider takes" about this situation, so keep dem posts coming.
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


blungld, you may have assumed I was making a point that I was not making. No, I do not believe that Ukrainians in the 21st century "want Russian occupation or control" at all. (Especially now!)

I would be interested in more of your "insider takes" about this situation, so keep dem posts coming.
Apologies if I misunderstood.

I have been getting some updates from relatives in Kiev, Lviv, and Warsaw. Watching footage on news it is surreal seeing places you have recently been being under assault. I have been heartened by Ukrainians and Poles helping one another at the moment.

My mother escaped Ukraine as a child during WWII where all the families had to decide do I go East or West? Do we have a better chance of survival under Hitler or Stalin? The families that crossed the Sanok bridge and chose Stalin mostly died. My grandfather was a judge and would have been purged so they escaped and made their way to Vienna. There are many harrowing stories about that journey and time there, but in Vienna without a place to sleep my grandmother who had been stoic and tough finally broke down. Washing a dirty diaper in a river a woman took pity on the family and invited them to stay in her apartment (these things are happening in Poland now). While staying there Nazi soldiers broke in, drunk and demanded they sleep the night there. They made my mother (a child) sleep in their room and the rest of the family spent all night assuming she would be raped or killed. Instead they kept her there because they were afraid they would be killed in their sleep. The Nazis evacuated as Americans advanced and my mother remembers nights of terror in bomb shelters. Throughout all of this my grandfather and grandmother took classes at the university. That was the importance they put on education. In a transient state during war they went and took classes. It blows my mind.

After the war, my mother spent years in an American DP camp in Belgium where the kindness of American soldiers made her love the liberators. She moved to the US and they slowly built a life. The first bed she slept in was her dorm at Ohio State. The first restaurant she ever ate at was her first date with my dad at a Howard Johnsons (which she thought was so fancy).

My parents built a life where I was completely insulated from this and I led a sheltered upper middle class life in Santa Barbara. I try and remember their story, their sacrifices, and my legacy. I never thought my mother would live to see similar things taking place in Ukraine again, and the liberating country she fled to that has given her so much now spreading Russian propaganda and an actual ex-President siding with and apologizing for Russian aggression and authoritarianism. She is stunned at what America has let itself believe and become these past five years. And what people allow themselves to just casually throw around without having lived consequences of war and fascism, and the real things that the MAGA crowd only pretends to understand and turns on its head through the misuse of words, the belief of misinformation, an undying loyalty to the tribe, and the cult of personality to a spoiled narcissist playboy with daddy issues.
The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld said:

Big C said:


blungld, you may have assumed I was making a point that I was not making. No, I do not believe that Ukrainians in the 21st century "want Russian occupation or control" at all. (Especially now!)

I would be interested in more of your "insider takes" about this situation, so keep dem posts coming.
Apologies if I misunderstood.

I have been getting some updates from relatives in Kiev, Lviv, and Warsaw. Watching footage on news it is surreal seeing places you have recently been being under assault. I have been heartened by Ukrainians and Poles helping one another at the moment.

My mother escaped Ukraine as a child during WWII where all the families had to decide do I go East or West? Do we have a better chance of survival under Hitler or Stalin? The families that crossed the Sanok bridge and chose Stalin mostly died. My grandfather was a judge and would have been purged so they escaped and made their way to Vienna. There are many harrowing stories about that journey and time there, but in Vienna without a place to sleep my grandmother who had been stoic and tough finally broke down. Washing a dirty diaper in a river a woman took pity on the family and invited them to stay in her apartment (these things are happening in Poland now). While staying there Nazi soldiers broke in, drunk and demanded they sleep the night there. They made my mother (a child) sleep in their room and the rest of the family spent all night assuming she would be raped or killed. Instead they kept her there because they were afraid they would be killed in their sleep. The Nazis evacuated as Americans advanced and my mother remembers nights of terror in bomb shelters. Throughout all of this my grandfather and grandmother took classes at the university. That was the importance they put on education. In a transient state during war they went and took classes. It blows my mind.

After the war, my mother spent years in an American DP camp in Belgium where the kindness of American soldiers made her love the liberators. She moved to the US and they slowly built a life. The first bed she slept in was her dorm at Ohio State. The first restaurant she ever ate at was her first date with my dad at a Howard Johnsons (which she thought was so fancy).

My parents built a life where I was completely insulated from this and I led a sheltered upper middle class life in Santa Barbara. I try and remember their story, their sacrifices, and my legacy. I never thought my mother would live to see similar things taking place in Ukraine again, and the liberating country she fled to that has given her so much now spreading Russian propaganda and an actual ex-President siding with and apologizing for Russian aggression and authoritarianism. She is stunned at what America has let itself believe and become these past five years. And what people allow themselves to just casually throw around without having lived consequences of war and fascism, and the real things that the MAGA crowd only pretends to understand and turns on its head through the misuse of words, the belief of misinformation, an undying loyalty to the tribe, and the cult of personality to a spoiled narcissist playboy with daddy issues.

Thanks for sharing.

My grandparents were also products of WW2 living in Europe at the time.

My mother was born near the start of the war and my dad was born shortly after it ended.

My dad had no older siblings, but my oldest aunt (who just passed in November 2021) was a teenager when the war ended. She remembered some events but others she blocked out and refused to acknowledge in later years (downplaying the horror) despite my mom and their middle sister both agreeing that certain terrible events did in fact happen.

Listening to their stories about the war and about the time right after the war has educated me about things most Americans (unless they served) are completely oblivious about since the war never made it to the doorstep of the US.

I think those experiences were part of the reason my parents left and I was born here in the US.

I find it hard to believe some people will be going through those same things in a relatively modern country like Ukraine in 2022.

BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:


Greenwald goes on the traitor list for sure. I was glad to see this accountability from Taibbi, as I still had some lingering respect for him.

How do you choose? Greenwald goes on Tucker's show and Taibbi on Rogan's show. Plus, Taibbi was very big on Russia collusion being a hoax from the very beginning.
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.