The Official Ketanji Brown Jackson's Supreme Court Hearings Thread

15,280 Views | 176 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by BearForce2
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

MinotStateBeav said:

Unit2Sucks said:

MinotStateBeav said:

She was asked "What is a woman?"

"I don't know, I can't answer that, I'm not a biologist".

This is the level of brain rot occurring on the left these days.
It was a stupid question to ask a SCOTUS nominee and her response was perfect. Morons like Blackburn are just there to deplorable signal and have no interest in doing their job. They are asking her to weigh on a number of irrelevant subjects and if she were to actually answer they would criticize her for having views that go beyond her area of expertise. She's been exemplary in dealing with their BS. Compare to Kavanaugh who completely lost his **** when he wasn't being asked to talk about Squee and how much he likes beer.
It was so stupid she was incapable of answering it lol. You people are f'ing nuts. Bet she spent a long lunch looking for the women's room.
She chose not to answer it because she's smarter than the person asking the dumb question. Answering the dumb question couldn't possibly help KBJ.





Thank you for saying being a woman is biological. Instead we're nominating a potato brain who thinks you need to be a biologist to answer a simple question.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WalterSobchak said:

MinotStateBeav said:



It was so stupid she was incapable of answering it lol. You people are f'ing nuts. Bet she spent a long lunch looking for the women's room.
I know you're too dumb to understand, but she didn't refuse to answer. She said "in effect":

"As a judge, I don't 'provide' definitions. When there is a dispute about the definition of a term in a case, I consider the evidence submitted by the parties. Sometimes that takes the form of expert testimony. On the issue of gender, a biologist would likely be qualified to provide expert testimony. This is currently a hotly contested issue that might make its way to the court. Accordingly, it would not be appropriate for me to comment here on my personal opinion because it is irrelevant to the legal determinations that I might need to make."



Bingo.
I guess the education that Minot State is offering these days isnt worth a roll of toilet paper.
It should be obvious why a judge doesnt provide personal opinions or definitions.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The key difference between this confirmation hearing and those of Thomas and Kavanaugh:

Thomas and Kavanaugh were guilty as charged and everyone knew it. All the questions were related to those allegations of sexual misconduct.*

In the present hearing, they have nothing on Judge Jackson so Republican senators are engaging in buffoonery.

*Do I think time stale accusations of sexual misconduct against Thomas and Kavanaugh were raised for political reasons? Absolutely.

Do I think those allegations would have been raised if the perpetrator and the victim shared the same political philosophy? No way (but the victim would probably secretly hope the perpetrator did not get confirmed).

Do I think Thomas and Kavanaugh would have failed lie detector tests? Oh Yeah.

Do I think they would have given up details of their misconduct that only the perp would know if Det. Vic Mackey interrogated them with the CCTV camera blocked and his service piece jammed against their heads. Hell yes.



Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

Unit2Sucks said:

MinotStateBeav said:

She was asked "What is a woman?"

"I don't know, I can't answer that, I'm not a biologist".

This is the level of brain rot occurring on the left these days.
It was a stupid question to ask a SCOTUS nominee and her response was perfect. Morons like Blackburn are just there to deplorable signal and have no interest in doing their job. They are asking her to weigh on a number of irrelevant subjects and if she were to actually answer they would criticize her for having views that go beyond her area of expertise. She's been exemplary in dealing with their BS. Compare to Kavanaugh who completely lost his **** when he wasn't being asked to talk about Squee and how much he likes beer.
It was so stupid she was incapable of answering it lol. You people are f'ing nuts. Bet she spent a long lunch looking for the women's room.

Man using the head: Ma'am, this is the men's room.
Judge Jackson: What are you talking about? I'm not a biologist and neither are you.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearForce2 said:

White House Covering Up 48,000 Documents on SCOTUS Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Grassley Democrats are stonewalling GOP efforts to obtain Jackson's documents.

Mike Davis: Democrats and Dick Durbin Are Hiding Ketanji Brown Jackson's Record on Child Predators-Child Porn Sentencing

In 59% of all prosecutions involving child porn defendants across the country, sentencing was lower than the guidelines.
Of course, that probably doesnt "fit" your narrative.

lol



40 months lower to be exact, apparently.

Ted Cruz SHREDS Biden's woke Supreme Court pick into SILENCE then Democrats try to silence HIM.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

MinotStateBeav said:

She was asked "What is a woman?"

"I don't know, I can't answer that, I'm not a biologist".

This is the level of brain rot occurring on the left these days.

Quick question for you...

Is 2-time Olympic Gold Medalist in the Women's 800m a woman or a man?

I'll wait for your answer.


It's been over an hour.
Still waiting . . .
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
helltopay1 said:

Judge Jackson......" What did you have for breakfast today, dear'?????
Judge Kavanaugh..." Is it true you raped 100 women while you were in your fraternity....please answer yes or no..


..Everyone knows she is an Affirmative Action nominee...Everyone also knows she will be a reliable left-wing vote on every issue for the next 500 years......She did not repudiate the "court-packing" question...automatic disqualification...


Judge, have you....I don't if it's buffed or boofed? How do you pronounce that?

BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearForce2 said:

White House Covering Up 48,000 Documents on SCOTUS Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Grassley Democrats are stonewalling GOP efforts to obtain Jackson's documents.

Mike Davis: Democrats and Dick Durbin Are Hiding Ketanji Brown Jackson's Record on Child Predators-Child Porn Sentencing

In 59% of all prosecutions involving child porn defendants across the country, sentencing was lower than the guidelines.
Of course, that probably doesnt "fit" your narrative.

lol



40 months lower to be exact, apparently.

Ted Cruz SHREDS Biden's woke Supreme Court pick into SILENCE then Democrats try to silence HIM.

Maybe Cruz should apologize for his attempt at smearing the nation's first black female Supreme Court justice with allegations that she is soft on the people who come before her on child pornography charges or he could throw his daughters under the bus again and blame his behavior on them while vacationing in Cancun.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

BearForce2 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearForce2 said:

White House Covering Up 48,000 Documents on SCOTUS Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Grassley Democrats are stonewalling GOP efforts to obtain Jackson's documents.

Mike Davis: Democrats and Dick Durbin Are Hiding Ketanji Brown Jackson's Record on Child Predators-Child Porn Sentencing

In 59% of all prosecutions involving child porn defendants across the country, sentencing was lower than the guidelines.
Of course, that probably doesnt "fit" your narrative.

lol



40 months lower to be exact, apparently.

Ted Cruz SHREDS Biden's woke Supreme Court pick into SILENCE then Democrats try to silence HIM.

Maybe Cruz should apologize for his attempt at smearing the nation's first black female Supreme Court justice with allegations that she is soft on the people who come before her on child pornography charges or he could throw his daughters under the bus again and blame his behavior on them while vacationing in Cancun.

Send Cruz to the women's restroom for punishment!
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

BearNIt said:

BearForce2 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearForce2 said:

White House Covering Up 48,000 Documents on SCOTUS Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Grassley Democrats are stonewalling GOP efforts to obtain Jackson's documents.

Mike Davis: Democrats and Dick Durbin Are Hiding Ketanji Brown Jackson's Record on Child Predators-Child Porn Sentencing

In 59% of all prosecutions involving child porn defendants across the country, sentencing was lower than the guidelines.
Of course, that probably doesnt "fit" your narrative.

lol



40 months lower to be exact, apparently.

Ted Cruz SHREDS Biden's woke Supreme Court pick into SILENCE then Democrats try to silence HIM.

Maybe Cruz should apologize for his attempt at smearing the nation's first black female Supreme Court justice with allegations that she is soft on the people who come before her on child pornography charges or he could throw his daughters under the bus again and blame his behavior on them while vacationing in Cancun.

Send Cruz to the women's restroom for punishment!
What is with the RWNJ Holy Justice Warrior obsession with what men do in restrooms?
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

Unit2Sucks said:

MinotStateBeav said:

Unit2Sucks said:

MinotStateBeav said:

She was asked "What is a woman?"

"I don't know, I can't answer that, I'm not a biologist".

This is the level of brain rot occurring on the left these days.
It was a stupid question to ask a SCOTUS nominee and her response was perfect. Morons like Blackburn are just there to deplorable signal and have no interest in doing their job. They are asking her to weigh on a number of irrelevant subjects and if she were to actually answer they would criticize her for having views that go beyond her area of expertise. She's been exemplary in dealing with their BS. Compare to Kavanaugh who completely lost his **** when he wasn't being asked to talk about Squee and how much he likes beer.
It was so stupid she was incapable of answering it lol. You people are f'ing nuts. Bet she spent a long lunch looking for the women's room.
She chose not to answer it because she's smarter than the person asking the dumb question. Answering the dumb question couldn't possibly help KBJ.





Thank you for saying being a woman is biological. Instead we're nominating a potato brain who thinks you need to be a biologist to answer a simple question.
Thanks for missing the point, as is your wont.

Here is KBJ saying it in her own words; ones that even you won't be able to pretend to misunderstand.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What made me giggle is when a senator like Marsha Blackburn asks one of her endless twisting Dwinelle Hall hallway to nowhere questions/speeches (which she didn't write so she reads it like Ron Burgundy on a teleprompter), she adds at the end: "Now I know this is a difficult question…"

No, Marsha, you are an idiot, your staff prepared a moronic question, and you are trying to upgrade it by characterizing it as "difficult."
If the good Judge, at the end of Marsha's speech asked, "What is the question," Blackburn would go into Southern belle vapor lock.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cory Booker's comments were masterful.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Howard Stern used to do a goof where one of his posse would wear a microphone and an earbud and interact with various people as Stern would tell his guy what to say.

If it wouldn't destroy her chance to be on the SCOTUS, I would love to play that goof with me providing Judge Jackson with my responses to Republican senators' questions:

Sen. Blackburn: "Define a woman."

Judge Jackson: " The University of Pennsylvania swimmer Lia Thomas. Yeah, him, I mean her."

Lindsey Graham: "Do you know how many child pornography images are out there on the internet?"

Judge Jackson: "As a matter of fact, I do senator because I counted them once. There are 1,547,238,091 such images."

Lindsey Graham: " What faith are you, by the way?"

Judge Jackson: "I am a practitioner of Druidism, it is a shamanic religion."

Sen. Graham: "Can you fairly judge a Catholic?"

Judge Jackson: "Absolutely, in fact on of my last cases as a trial judge involved a pedophile priest. I ordered him castrated and sentenced him to 3 consecutive life terms."

Sen. Graham: " Uh, on a scale of 1 to 10, how faithful would you say you are in terms of religion?"

Judge Jackson: "16."


Sen. Graham: "Do you attend church regularly?"

Judge Jackson: "Yes, I go to Druid ceremonies 2 times a day and 3 times on Sunday."

Sen. Cruz: " Do you agree with this book that is being taught to kids, that babies are racist?"

Judge Jackson: "Yes, I do agree with that book that babies can be racist. Your father, Rafael, you know, the man who conspired with Lee Harvey Oswald to assassinate President Kennedy, once said in an interview that his son, Teddy, showed racist tendencies at 10 months."







Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://vm.tiktok.com/TTPd5xwuwx/

Well put … but they don't want to discuss the facts (as usual)
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I know you could find someone else to try and make this point because this right is not it !!!

Is he your boyfriend?
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

BearForce2 said:

BearNIt said:

BearForce2 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearForce2 said:

White House Covering Up 48,000 Documents on SCOTUS Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Grassley Democrats are stonewalling GOP efforts to obtain Jackson's documents.

Mike Davis: Democrats and Dick Durbin Are Hiding Ketanji Brown Jackson's Record on Child Predators-Child Porn Sentencing

In 59% of all prosecutions involving child porn defendants across the country, sentencing was lower than the guidelines.
Of course, that probably doesnt "fit" your narrative.

lol



40 months lower to be exact, apparently.

Ted Cruz SHREDS Biden's woke Supreme Court pick into SILENCE then Democrats try to silence HIM.

Maybe Cruz should apologize for his attempt at smearing the nation's first black female Supreme Court justice with allegations that she is soft on the people who come before her on child pornography charges or he could throw his daughters under the bus again and blame his behavior on them while vacationing in Cancun.

Send Cruz to the women's restroom for punishment!
What is with the RWNJ Holy Justice Warrior obsession with what men do in restrooms?


Because for many Republicans restrooms are sexualized. Just ask Larry Craig.





wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Moving back to actual testimony, Jackson has said:

1) She is against critical race theory and other progressive ideas about education.

2) She has never taken a public position on school issues like whether young children should be taught about gender identity, and given that there are likely to be cases in front of SCOTUS, she has not opined on the issue, which is SOP these days.

3) As a federal judge, she has a mainstream record, not typical of some other Democratic nominees like Sotomayer.

4) She has often praised law enforcement, and her close family members are police officers.

5) She apparently takes a strict constructionist view on reviewing the Constitution and having the courts defer to the legislature.

This is about as good as it going to get for conservatives from a Biden nominee. The narrative is because she is black she must have certain views. The conservatives would be wise to have her board, as it seems likely she would be part be right of Sotoamayer and more in the middle. Just my two cents.
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

Moving back to actual testimony, Jackson has said:

1) She is against critical race theory and other progressive ideas about education.

2) She has never taken a public position on school issues like whether young children should be taught about gender identity, and given that there are likely to be cases in front of SCOTUS, she has not opined on the issue, which is SOP these days.

3) As a federal judge, she has a mainstream record, not typical of some other Democratic nominees like Sotomayer.

4) She has often praised law enforcement, and her close family members are police officers.

5) She apparently takes a strict constructionist view on reviewing the Constitution and having the courts defer to the legislature.

This is about as good as it going to get for conservatives from a Biden nominee. The narrative is because she is black she must have certain views. The conservatives would be wise to have her board, as it seems likely she would be part be right of Sotoamayer and more in the middle. Just my two cents.


Sounds reasonable to me. Sign her up.
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

GoOskie said:

Lady Lindsey did it. He mentioned Soros. The republican party is a joke, yet so many people keep voting for them.
Lindsey is an idiot who thinks he has a shot at POTUS
I don't think he is that deluded to think he has a shot at POTUS. I do think someone has something on him and he is compromised.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?



Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BKA anti anything Black Pro everything white/status quo/establishment aka oppression of marginalized people for profit
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoOskie said:

BearNIt said:

GoOskie said:

Lady Lindsey did it. He mentioned Soros. The republican party is a joke, yet so many people keep voting for them.
Lindsey is an idiot who thinks he has a shot at POTUS
I don't think he is that deluded to think he has a shot at POTUS. I do think someone has something on him and he is compromised.
I don't dismiss the egos of all politicians. If his echo chamber is telling him he has a shot then he may be just deluded enough to believe he has a chance if Trump doesn't run. His support of Trump was and is still odd given his comments in the 2016 election about Trump being a danger. This is where your comments regarding someone having something on him could ring true.
Rushinbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
helltopay1 said:

Judge Jackson......" What did you have for breakfast today, dear'?????
Judge Kavanaugh..." Is it true you raped 100 women while you were in your fraternity....please answer yes or no..


..Everyone knows she is an Affirmative Action nominee...Everyone also knows she will be a reliable left-wing vote on every issue for the next 500 years......She did not repudiate the "court-packing" question...automatic disqualification...
When you look at such things as soft on pedo sentencing, failure to define "woman" (with the disclaimer she issues "I'm not a biologist"), lack of meaningful opinions, undistinguished edu quals (Harvard, Harvard Law where she did nothing to distinguish herself), job hopping, you are led to one conclusion - MANCHURiAN CANDIDATE.

Sadly, the Dems could have done much better, even within the narrowed population they cut out for themselves. She has the votes.
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rushinbear said:

helltopay1 said:

Judge Jackson......" What did you have for breakfast today, dear'?????
Judge Kavanaugh..." Is it true you raped 100 women while you were in your fraternity....please answer yes or no..


..Everyone knows she is an Affirmative Action nominee...Everyone also knows she will be a reliable left-wing vote on every issue for the next 500 years......She did not repudiate the "court-packing" question...automatic disqualification...
When you look at such things as soft on pedo sentencing, failure to define "woman" (with the disclaimer she issues "I'm not a biologist"), lack of meaningful opinions, undistinguished edu quals (Harvard, Harvard Law where she did nothing to distinguish herself), job hopping, you are led to one conclusion - MANCHURiAN CANDIDATE.

Sadly, the Dems could have done much better, even within the narrowed population they cut out for themselves. She has the votes.
THAT'S BULLSHYTE!!!!!!. The rebulicans can't make any substantial arguments against her confirmation so they trot out Cancun Ted, Jackass Josh, and Bootlicking Lindsey who decide that bringing up a racist baby, child pornography, and pedophiles was the way to go to discredit Judge Brown Jackson. How the **** did that go? Mission Accomplished?
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

BKA anti anything Black Pro everything white/status quo/establishment aka oppression of marginalized people for profit


What?
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Exactly
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
" It's easy to blame White guys for the degradations of American politics, as if they don't have spouses and mothers who form, encourage, and profit from their *******ry.
I don't want to pick on Arkansas, but nobody marries Tom Cotton or Bill Clinton by mistake or lack of options. We pretend that these guys would be who they are, if being who they are didn't get them laid. "
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

Cory Booker's comments were masterful.



He seems nutty to me.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

BearNIt said:

Cory Booker's comments were masterful.



He seems nutty to me.


Only him ? I guess the stooges you bow for are saints ?
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

BearNIt said:

Cory Booker's comments were masterful.



He seems nutty to me.
As compared to Cancun Ted or Bootlicking Lindsey or Orange Julius Ceasar? Please provide your definition of nutty so there is no confusion.






MiZery
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't think bf2 has ever said anything truthful here
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.