Replacement Theory is American fascism. It's proponents are Tucker Carlson, the Buffalo shooter, Stefanik (#3 in the GOP), and according to polling, 50% of Republicans.

Do any of our posters promote this guy?

3 weeks ago… pic.twitter.com/1aUE82iGeo

— PatriotTakes 🇺🇸 (@patriottakes) May 16, 2022

Yep

going4roses said:

---

Yep

---

Maybe just in Waukesha.

Why do you think Democrats have espoused and insisted upon open borders for about the last 40 years????because they love immigrants????Please...The bottom line.....Come to this country anyway you can...we will give you free stuff....we will even enable you to vote even though you are illegal.....in return, don't forget to vote for the Party which gave you access to this country as well as tons of free stuff....
What would you call this 40 year operation????
California used to be red...now, if's stone-cold blue.......gee....how did that happen?????

This deranged 18 year-old despised Jews. Where did he get that min d-set?????
As a general rule in this country, republicans support Israel. As a general rule, many democrats are virulently anti-Israel. There is a reason that, at on e point, the approval rate for Obama in Israel was a whopping 4%!!!
Republicans supported the Abraham accords.....Democrats did not and do not!!!As a general rule, Republicans do not support the Iran deal. As a general rule, Democrats do support the Iran deal which gave Iran millions of dollars in a secret cash deal engineered by Obama as well as a free path to nuclear weapons .
As a general rule, Democrats support outlawing businesses in the US which do business with Israel. Republicans do not support this movement
Many college campuses advocate the expulsion of jewish groups on campus.

Orthodox Jews are frequently singled out and assaulted in New York by marauding bands of anti-jewish thugs.
These thugs are never associated with Republicans


To repeat...where did this deranged 18 year-old get his virulent anti-jewish hatred???
granted, he was deranged before he fixated on jews, but, one political party is totally exempt from fostering this hatred while one political party does not have clean hands....

helltopay1 said:

---

This deranged 18 year-old despised Jews. Where did he get that min d-set?????
As a general rule in this country, republicans support Israel. As a general rule, many democrats are virulently anti-Israel. There is a reason that, at on e point, the approval rate for Obama in Israel was a whopping 4%!!!
Republicans supported the Abraham accords.....Democrats did not and do not!!!As a general rule, Republicans do not support the Iran deal. As a general rule, Democrats do support the Iran deal which gave Iran millions of dollars in a secret cash deal engineered by Obama as well as a free path to nuclear weapons .
As a general rule, Democrats support outlawing businesses in the US which do business with Israel. Republicans do not support this movement
Many college campuses advocate the expulsion of jewish groups on campus.

Orthodox Jews are frequently singled out and assaulted in New York by marauding bands of anti-jewish thugs.
These thugs are never associated with Republicans


To repeat...where did this deranged 18 year-old get his virulent anti-jewish hatred???
granted, he was deranged before he fixated on jews, but, one political party is totally exempt from fostering this hatred while one political party does not have clean hands....

---

Wow. That's pretty sh*tty up you to turn this into dems being at fault when 1) he attacked black people specifically, 2) his rifle had anti-black comments on it and 3) the leaders of the party that you love espouse Great Replacement Theory that the shooter followed.

Do the leaders of the Democrat Party support Great Replacement Theory? Nope!

You probably posted this because today you are ashamed of being a republican.

Wow. Look at the timestamps for helltopay1's posts. They were posted shortly after Tucker Carlson blamed the Dems. And guess what helltopay1 does? He parrots Tucker's talking points, even though Tucker and the Buffalo gunman are devoted to the same Great Replacement Theory ideology.

You guys are nuts. You really think conservatives/republicans are racists and you crow this when some moron does something that you think supports your point of view and ignore it when some other idiot does something that doesn't not support your point of view.

This is not healthy or good for anybody.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-demented-and-selective-game-of?s=r

NVBear78 said:

---

You guys are nuts. You really think conservatives/republicans are racists and you crow this when some moron does something that you think supports your point of view and ignore it when some other idiot does something that doesn't not support your point of view.

This is not healthy or good for anybody.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-demented-and-selective-game-of?s=r

---

How do you feel about Tucker Carlson and Elise Stefanik promoting the great replacement theory? Pride? Disgust?

okaydo said:

---

NVBear78 said:

---

You guys are nuts. You really think conservatives/republicans are racists and you crow this when some moron does something that you think supports your point of view and ignore it when some other idiot does something that doesn't not support your point of view.

This is not healthy or good for anybody.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-demented-and-selective-game-of?s=r

---

How do you feel about Tucker Carlson and Elise Stefanik promoting the great replacement theory? Pride? Disgust?

---

They don't. This is total BS.

Being against open borders policies (or for that matter, large scale immigration) is not the same thing as adopting the GRT, which is an anti-Semitic/white nationalist trope.

Democrats have been bragging for years that changed demographics - DUE TO IMMIGRATION - would give them political gains.

From Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/research/states-of-change-2019/

"Demographics are not destiny, but steady and predictable changes to the electorate play an important role in defining the landscape of American politics. Most demographic groups have a political lean, so a group increasing or decreasing in size over time will tend to benefit one party or type of politics over another. The most well-known example is the growth of the nonwhite population in the United States, whichsince nonwhites tend to lean heavily Democraticis typically viewed as tilting the electoral terrain somewhat toward the Democrats over time as well as increasing the weight of nonwhite voters within the Democratic Party over time. But other changes are important, such as the decline of noncollege educated voters, particularly whites; the aging of the adult population; and the rise of new generations to replace older ones."

From politico: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/11/12/2020-election-analysis-democrats-future-david-shor-interview-436334

"For years, the Democratic Party has operated under one immutable assumption: Long-term demographic trends would give the party something like a permanent majority as the country as a whole grows less white and more urban. President Donald Trump's reliance on the politics of racial resentment would only quicken the process, solidifying support for Democrats among people of color."

So with the dems openly promoting demographic change as a means to political power - and then illegally refusing to enforce the borders to make that happen ASAP - is it any surprise that republicans object? Republican objections are based on politics/policy, not race or notions of white supremacy. I note that people from Cuba are non-white, yet republicans would no doubt take more cuban voters.

The dems approach is pretty cynical - stake your political hopes on letting large groups of immigrants in to effect "demographic change" for political reasons, then accuse anyone who objects as being racist/white supremacist.

BearGoggles said:

---

okaydo said:

---

NVBear78 said:

---

You guys are nuts. You really think conservatives/republicans are racists and you crow this when some moron does something that you think supports your point of view and ignore it when some other idiot does something that doesn't not support your point of view.

This is not healthy or good for anybody.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-demented-and-selective-game-of?s=r

---

How do you feel about Tucker Carlson and Elise Stefanik promoting the great replacement theory? Pride? Disgust?

---

They don't. This is total BS.

Being against open borders policies (or for that matter, large scale immigration) is not the same thing as adopting the GRT, which is an anti-Semitic/white nationalist trope.

Democrats have been bragging for years that changed demographics - DUE TO IMMIGRATION - would give them political gains.

From Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/research/states-of-change-2019/

"Demographics are not destiny, but steady and predictable changes to the electorate play an important role in defining the landscape of American politics. Most demographic groups have a political lean, so a group increasing or decreasing in size over time will tend to benefit one party or type of politics over another. The most well-known example is the growth of the nonwhite population in the United States, whichsince nonwhites tend to lean heavily Democraticis typically viewed as tilting the electoral terrain somewhat toward the Democrats over time as well as increasing the weight of nonwhite voters within the Democratic Party over time. But other changes are important, such as the decline of noncollege educated voters, particularly whites; the aging of the adult population; and the rise of new generations to replace older ones."

From politico: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/11/12/2020-election-analysis-democrats-future-david-shor-interview-436334

"For years, the Democratic Party has operated under one immutable assumption: Long-term demographic trends would give the party something like a permanent majority as the country as a whole grows less white and more urban. President Donald Trump's reliance on the politics of racial resentment would only quicken the process, solidifying support for Democrats among people of color."

So with the dems openly promoting demographic change as a means to political power - and then illegally refusing to enforce the borders to make that happen ASAP - is it any surprise that republicans object? Republican objections are based on politics/policy, not race or notions of white supremacy. I note that people from Cuba are non-white, yet republicans would no doubt take more cuban voters.

The dems approach is pretty cynical - stake your political hopes on letting large groups of immigrants in to effect "demographic change" for political reasons, then accuse anyone who objects as being racist/white supremacist.

---

Predicting that something is going to happen is not the same as making it happen for your own political gain. What have Democrats actually done to create open borders in that time?

BearGoggles said:

---

okaydo said:

---

NVBear78 said:

---

You guys are nuts. You really think conservatives/republicans are racists and you crow this when some moron does something that you think supports your point of view and ignore it when some other idiot does something that doesn't not support your point of view.

This is not healthy or good for anybody.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-demented-and-selective-game-of?s=r

---

How do you feel about Tucker Carlson and Elise Stefanik promoting the great replacement theory? Pride? Disgust?

---

They don't. This is total BS.

Being against open borders policies (or for that matter, large scale immigration) is not the same thing as adopting the GRT, which is an anti-Semitic/white nationalist trope.

Democrats have been bragging for years that changed demographics - DUE TO IMMIGRATION - would give them political gains.

From Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/research/states-of-change-2019/

"Demographics are not destiny, but steady and predictable changes to the electorate play an important role in defining the landscape of American politics. Most demographic groups have a political lean, so a group increasing or decreasing in size over time will tend to benefit one party or type of politics over another. The most well-known example is the growth of the nonwhite population in the United States, whichsince nonwhites tend to lean heavily Democraticis typically viewed as tilting the electoral terrain somewhat toward the Democrats over time as well as increasing the weight of nonwhite voters within the Democratic Party over time. But other changes are important, such as the decline of noncollege educated voters, particularly whites; the aging of the adult population; and the rise of new generations to replace older ones."

From politico: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/11/12/2020-election-analysis-democrats-future-david-shor-interview-436334

"For years, the Democratic Party has operated under one immutable assumption: Long-term demographic trends would give the party something like a permanent majority as the country as a whole grows less white and more urban. President Donald Trump's reliance on the politics of racial resentment would only quicken the process, solidifying support for Democrats among people of color."

So with the dems openly promoting demographic change as a means to political power - and then illegally refusing to enforce the borders to make that happen ASAP - is it any surprise that republicans object? Republican objections are based on politics/policy, not race or notions of white supremacy. I note that people from Cuba are non-white, yet republicans would no doubt take more cuban voters.

The dems approach is pretty cynical - stake your political hopes on letting large groups of immigrants in to effect "demographic change" for political reasons, then accuse anyone who objects as being racist/white supremacist.

---

Did you analyze 1,150 to come to your conclusion?

Or did you listen to Greenwald and/or Tucker?

On Carlson’s show, he pits the “ruling class” (what he often refers to as “they”) against “you,” his viewers, who are part of a Fox News audience that is 92 percent white and overwhelmingly older, according to Nielsen data. “They” threaten everything “you” believe in. pic.twitter.com/bCmRC0Huj2

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 30, 2022

Carlson referred to this “ruling class” in more than 800 of his 1,150 episodes from the beginning of his show in November 2016 through 2021, the extent of our analysis. From 2020 on, he pushed this theory in nearly every episode. https://t.co/4Q0dQygM6N pic.twitter.com/PE8ZZOmtLs

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 30, 2022

Carlson has used rhetoric related to an unfounded racist conspiracy theory that falling birthrates and immigration are leading to the replacement of white people. Versions of “replacement theory” have been promoted by extremists and have helped inspire mass shootings. pic.twitter.com/8FrAxe1Hun

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 30, 2022

As the number of opposing guests on Carlson’s show shrank, the length of his monologues has become far longer — typically more than 10 uninterrupted minutes per episode. https://t.co/4Q0dQygM6N pic.twitter.com/4jzSu7IRiE

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 30, 2022

Carlson’s segments often end up in the same place: the destruction of society (600 episodes). He devoted five times as many hours to this narrative of fear in 2021 as he did in 2017, the first full year of the show.

See our full analysis. https://t.co/4Q0dQygM6N

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 30, 2022

sycasey said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

okaydo said:

---

NVBear78 said:

---

You guys are nuts. You really think conservatives/republicans are racists and you crow this when some moron does something that you think supports your point of view and ignore it when some other idiot does something that doesn't not support your point of view.

This is not healthy or good for anybody.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-demented-and-selective-game-of?s=r

---

How do you feel about Tucker Carlson and Elise Stefanik promoting the great replacement theory? Pride? Disgust?

---

They don't. This is total BS.

Being against open borders policies (or for that matter, large scale immigration) is not the same thing as adopting the GRT, which is an anti-Semitic/white nationalist trope.

Democrats have been bragging for years that changed demographics - DUE TO IMMIGRATION - would give them political gains.

From Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/research/states-of-change-2019/

"Demographics are not destiny, but steady and predictable changes to the electorate play an important role in defining the landscape of American politics. Most demographic groups have a political lean, so a group increasing or decreasing in size over time will tend to benefit one party or type of politics over another. The most well-known example is the growth of the nonwhite population in the United States, whichsince nonwhites tend to lean heavily Democraticis typically viewed as tilting the electoral terrain somewhat toward the Democrats over time as well as increasing the weight of nonwhite voters within the Democratic Party over time. But other changes are important, such as the decline of noncollege educated voters, particularly whites; the aging of the adult population; and the rise of new generations to replace older ones."

From politico: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/11/12/2020-election-analysis-democrats-future-david-shor-interview-436334

"For years, the Democratic Party has operated under one immutable assumption: Long-term demographic trends would give the party something like a permanent majority as the country as a whole grows less white and more urban. President Donald Trump's reliance on the politics of racial resentment would only quicken the process, solidifying support for Democrats among people of color."

So with the dems openly promoting demographic change as a means to political power - and then illegally refusing to enforce the borders to make that happen ASAP - is it any surprise that republicans object? Republican objections are based on politics/policy, not race or notions of white supremacy. I note that people from Cuba are non-white, yet republicans would no doubt take more cuban voters.

The dems approach is pretty cynical - stake your political hopes on letting large groups of immigrants in to effect "demographic change" for political reasons, then accuse anyone who objects as being racist/white supremacist.

---

Predicting that something is going to happen is not the same as making it happen for your own political gain. What have Democrats actually done to create open borders in that time?

---

Seriously?

DACA, DARPA, reduced deportations/enforcement under Biden, discontinuing multiple trump policies that dissuaded illegal immigration (stay in Mexico and title 42, most notably), discontinuing construction of the border wall, and refusing to reform the broken "asylum" process which is driving the current crisis.

I will also add that any policy which gives illegal immigrants benefits will draw more immigrants.

The dems know a massive surge is coming due to Biden admin's political choice to terminate Title 42. What have they done? Nothing. They could pass a legislative fix in 10 minutes. But won't, despite the fact that many Dems (particularly those in AZ and TX) are begging for Biden to prevent the coming surge.

BearGoggles said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

okaydo said:

---

NVBear78 said:

---

You guys are nuts. You really think conservatives/republicans are racists and you crow this when some moron does something that you think supports your point of view and ignore it when some other idiot does something that doesn't not support your point of view.

This is not healthy or good for anybody.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-demented-and-selective-game-of?s=r

---

How do you feel about Tucker Carlson and Elise Stefanik promoting the great replacement theory? Pride? Disgust?

---

They don't. This is total BS.

Being against open borders policies (or for that matter, large scale immigration) is not the same thing as adopting the GRT, which is an anti-Semitic/white nationalist trope.

Democrats have been bragging for years that changed demographics - DUE TO IMMIGRATION - would give them political gains.

From Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/research/states-of-change-2019/

"Demographics are not destiny, but steady and predictable changes to the electorate play an important role in defining the landscape of American politics. Most demographic groups have a political lean, so a group increasing or decreasing in size over time will tend to benefit one party or type of politics over another. The most well-known example is the growth of the nonwhite population in the United States, whichsince nonwhites tend to lean heavily Democraticis typically viewed as tilting the electoral terrain somewhat toward the Democrats over time as well as increasing the weight of nonwhite voters within the Democratic Party over time. But other changes are important, such as the decline of noncollege educated voters, particularly whites; the aging of the adult population; and the rise of new generations to replace older ones."

From politico: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/11/12/2020-election-analysis-democrats-future-david-shor-interview-436334

"For years, the Democratic Party has operated under one immutable assumption: Long-term demographic trends would give the party something like a permanent majority as the country as a whole grows less white and more urban. President Donald Trump's reliance on the politics of racial resentment would only quicken the process, solidifying support for Democrats among people of color."

So with the dems openly promoting demographic change as a means to political power - and then illegally refusing to enforce the borders to make that happen ASAP - is it any surprise that republicans object? Republican objections are based on politics/policy, not race or notions of white supremacy. I note that people from Cuba are non-white, yet republicans would no doubt take more cuban voters.

The dems approach is pretty cynical - stake your political hopes on letting large groups of immigrants in to effect "demographic change" for political reasons, then accuse anyone who objects as being racist/white supremacist.

---

Predicting that something is going to happen is not the same as making it happen for your own political gain. What have Democrats actually done to create open borders in that time?

---

Seriously?

DACA, DARPA, reduced deportations/enforcement under Biden, discontinuing multiple trump policies that dissuaded illegal immigration (stay in Mexico and title 42, most notably), discontinuing construction of the border wall, and refusing to reform the broken "asylum" process which is driving the current crisis.

I will also add that any policy which gives illegal immigrants benefits will draw more immigrants.

The dems know a massive surge is coming due to Biden admin's political choice to terminate Title 42. What have they done? Nothing. They could pass a legislative fix in 10 minutes. But won't, despite the fact that many Dems (particularly those in AZ and TX) are begging for Biden to prevent the coming surge.

---

Just to take the first thing off your laundry list, DACA is not "open borders." DACA is allowing people who have already lived almost their entire lives in America to stay. It was also considered a reasonable, moderate plank of immigration reform until Republicans went all MAGA on us.

That's true of just about everything related to immigration: Democrats propose reforms, then Republicans block everything, including stuff they used to claim they agreed with. Meanwhile, Obama deported more immigrants than anyone. Republicans have a "closed border" policy more than Democrats have an "open border" one.

I, on the other hand, don't enjoy his input, but find his attempts to constantly elevate himself above others while claiming to be a victim amusing.

Replacement theory is the new Critical Race Theory- a dumb meme for an obscure fringe theory of no importance

okaydo said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

okaydo said:

---

NVBear78 said:

---

You guys are nuts. You really think conservatives/republicans are racists and you crow this when some moron does something that you think supports your point of view and ignore it when some other idiot does something that doesn't not support your point of view.

This is not healthy or good for anybody.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-demented-and-selective-game-of?s=r

---

How do you feel about Tucker Carlson and Elise Stefanik promoting the great replacement theory? Pride? Disgust?

---

They don't. This is total BS.

Being against open borders policies (or for that matter, large scale immigration) is not the same thing as adopting the GRT, which is an anti-Semitic/white nationalist trope.

Democrats have been bragging for years that changed demographics - DUE TO IMMIGRATION - would give them political gains.

From Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/research/states-of-change-2019/

"Demographics are not destiny, but steady and predictable changes to the electorate play an important role in defining the landscape of American politics. Most demographic groups have a political lean, so a group increasing or decreasing in size over time will tend to benefit one party or type of politics over another. The most well-known example is the growth of the nonwhite population in the United States, whichsince nonwhites tend to lean heavily Democraticis typically viewed as tilting the electoral terrain somewhat toward the Democrats over time as well as increasing the weight of nonwhite voters within the Democratic Party over time. But other changes are important, such as the decline of noncollege educated voters, particularly whites; the aging of the adult population; and the rise of new generations to replace older ones."

From politico: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/11/12/2020-election-analysis-democrats-future-david-shor-interview-436334

"For years, the Democratic Party has operated under one immutable assumption: Long-term demographic trends would give the party something like a permanent majority as the country as a whole grows less white and more urban. President Donald Trump's reliance on the politics of racial resentment would only quicken the process, solidifying support for Democrats among people of color."

So with the dems openly promoting demographic change as a means to political power - and then illegally refusing to enforce the borders to make that happen ASAP - is it any surprise that republicans object? Republican objections are based on politics/policy, not race or notions of white supremacy. I note that people from Cuba are non-white, yet republicans would no doubt take more cuban voters.

The dems approach is pretty cynical - stake your political hopes on letting large groups of immigrants in to effect "demographic change" for political reasons, then accuse anyone who objects as being racist/white supremacist.

---

Did you analyze 1,150 to come to your conclusion?

Or did you listen to Greenwald and/or Tucker?

On Carlson’s show, he pits the “ruling class” (what he often refers to as “they”) against “you,” his viewers, who are part of a Fox News audience that is 92 percent white and overwhelmingly older, according to Nielsen data. “They” threaten everything “you” believe in. pic.twitter.com/bCmRC0Huj2

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 30, 2022

Carlson referred to this “ruling class” in more than 800 of his 1,150 episodes from the beginning of his show in November 2016 through 2021, the extent of our analysis. From 2020 on, he pushed this theory in nearly every episode. https://t.co/4Q0dQygM6N pic.twitter.com/PE8ZZOmtLs

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 30, 2022

Carlson has used rhetoric related to an unfounded racist conspiracy theory that falling birthrates and immigration are leading to the replacement of white people. Versions of “replacement theory” have been promoted by extremists and have helped inspire mass shootings. pic.twitter.com/8FrAxe1Hun

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 30, 2022

As the number of opposing guests on Carlson’s show shrank, the length of his monologues has become far longer — typically more than 10 uninterrupted minutes per episode. https://t.co/4Q0dQygM6N pic.twitter.com/4jzSu7IRiE

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 30, 2022

Carlson’s segments often end up in the same place: the destruction of society (600 episodes). He devoted five times as many hours to this narrative of fear in 2021 as he did in 2017, the first full year of the show.

See our full analysis. https://t.co/4Q0dQygM6N

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 30, 2022

---

I have no idea what you're saying. If you're suggesting I should blindly adopt (or accept as accurate) a bunch of NY times tweets from a hit piece, then you should realize that's not an actual argument. The NY Times article is predicated on a bunch of highly subjective (and questionable) assessments about what is racist, dog whistling, etc. Lots of circular logic - you must be a racist if you oppose immigration for any reason.

And like your original post, you and apparently the NY Times wrongly conflate replacement theory (which is inherently and explicitly based on white supremacism) with opposing immigration for policy/political reasons.

If you have an argument to refute what I wrote - that this cynical politics - then by all means, share it. But responding with a bunch of tweets that are essentially attacks on Tucker Carlson - and don't show that he's an advocate of replacement theory (as it is correctly defined) - is largely irrelevant.

DiabloWags said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

Seriously?

DACA, DARPA, reduced deportations/enforcement under Biden, discontinuing multiple trump policies that dissuaded illegal immigration (stay in Mexico and title 42, most notably), discontinuing construction of the border wall, and refusing to reform the broken "asylum" process which is driving the current crisis.

---

Seriously.... DARPA?

What does the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency have to do with illegal immigration and border?

---

I meant DAPA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deferred_Action_for_Parents_of_Americans#:~:text=Deferred%20Action%20for%20Parents%20of%20Americans%20and%20Lawful%20Permanent%20Residents,since%202010%20and%20have%20children

BearForce2 said:

---

I, on the other hand, don't enjoy his input, but find his attempts to constantly elevate himself above others while claiming to be a victim amusing.

---

Don't lie. You do enjoy Trump's input.